Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation
Avaliar o desenvolvimento sustentável é, actualmente, um pré-requisito essencial para promover uma agricultura sustentável. Para isso torna-se necessário conhecer as metodologias de avaliação que mostrem explicitamente as vantagens e desvantagens ambientais, sociais e económicas das diferentes estra...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Spanisch ; Portugiesisch |
| Erschienen: |
2010 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
indicadores de sustentabilidade métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Revista de Ciências Agrárias - Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal, 2009, 33(2010), 2, Seite 75-89 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:33 ; year:2010 ; number:2 ; pages:75-89 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ052280020 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ052280020 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230308164800.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ052280020 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJf13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a spa |a por | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Avaliar o desenvolvimento sustentável é, actualmente, um pré-requisito essencial para promover uma agricultura sustentável. Para isso torna-se necessário conhecer as metodologias de avaliação que mostrem explicitamente as vantagens e desvantagens ambientais, sociais e económicas das diferentes estratégias e sistemas de produção. Nesse sentido, apresenta-se, neste trabalho, as iniciativas de investigação no âmbito da avaliação da sustentabilidade dirigidas, em particular, para o sector agrário. A revisão crítica das mesmas revela que não obstante as várias propostas metodológicas identificadas acusarem importantes esforços para a avaliação da sustentabilidade, visualizando-se semelhanças nalguns dos seus pressupostos, identificam-se, na generalidade, procedimentos díspares, com algumas limitações e debilidades comuns, e a ausência de interacção entre grande parte das abordagens desenvolvidas.<br<Evaluating sustainable development is, at present, an essential prerequisite for promoting sustainable agriculture. For this, it becomes necessary to know the evaluation methodologies that explicitly reflect the environmental, social and economic advantages and disadvantages of different strategies and production systems. In that sense, this work presents research initiatives in the scope of sustainability evaluation in particularly for the agricultural sector. The critical review shows that despite the variety of identified methodological proposals shows some major efforts for the sustainability evaluation, with similarities in some of their assumptions, they confirm, in general, unrelated procedures, with some common limitations and weaknesses and lack of interaction between a large part of the developed approaches. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Agricultura sustentável | |
| 650 | 4 | |a avaliação da sustentabilidade | |
| 650 | 4 | |a indicadores de sustentabilidade | |
| 650 | 4 | |a métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Agriculture sustainable | |
| 650 | 4 | |a sustainability evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a sustainability evaluation methods | |
| 650 | 4 | |a sustainability indicators | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Agriculture | |
| 653 | 0 | |a S | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Revista de Ciências Agrárias |d Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal, 2009 |g 33(2010), 2, Seite 75-89 |w (DE-627)624250911 |w (DE-600)2548656-1 |x 2183041X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2010 |g number:2 |g pages:75-89 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/f13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.scielo.oces.mctes.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2010000200008 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0871-018X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 33 |j 2010 |e 2 |h 75-89 | ||
| author_variant |
a a v m r c aavmrc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:2183041X:2010----::giutrsseteiaaioutialarcl |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2010 |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ052280020 (DE-599)DOAJf13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa verfasserin aut Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Avaliar o desenvolvimento sustentável é, actualmente, um pré-requisito essencial para promover uma agricultura sustentável. Para isso torna-se necessário conhecer as metodologias de avaliação que mostrem explicitamente as vantagens e desvantagens ambientais, sociais e económicas das diferentes estratégias e sistemas de produção. Nesse sentido, apresenta-se, neste trabalho, as iniciativas de investigação no âmbito da avaliação da sustentabilidade dirigidas, em particular, para o sector agrário. A revisão crítica das mesmas revela que não obstante as várias propostas metodológicas identificadas acusarem importantes esforços para a avaliação da sustentabilidade, visualizando-se semelhanças nalguns dos seus pressupostos, identificam-se, na generalidade, procedimentos díspares, com algumas limitações e debilidades comuns, e a ausência de interacção entre grande parte das abordagens desenvolvidas.<br<Evaluating sustainable development is, at present, an essential prerequisite for promoting sustainable agriculture. For this, it becomes necessary to know the evaluation methodologies that explicitly reflect the environmental, social and economic advantages and disadvantages of different strategies and production systems. In that sense, this work presents research initiatives in the scope of sustainability evaluation in particularly for the agricultural sector. The critical review shows that despite the variety of identified methodological proposals shows some major efforts for the sustainability evaluation, with similarities in some of their assumptions, they confirm, in general, unrelated procedures, with some common limitations and weaknesses and lack of interaction between a large part of the developed approaches. Agricultura sustentável avaliação da sustentabilidade indicadores de sustentabilidade métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade Agriculture sustainable sustainability evaluation sustainability evaluation methods sustainability indicators Agriculture S In Revista de Ciências Agrárias Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal, 2009 33(2010), 2, Seite 75-89 (DE-627)624250911 (DE-600)2548656-1 2183041X nnns volume:33 year:2010 number:2 pages:75-89 https://doaj.org/article/f13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.oces.mctes.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2010000200008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0871-018X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 33 2010 2 75-89 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ052280020 (DE-599)DOAJf13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa verfasserin aut Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Avaliar o desenvolvimento sustentável é, actualmente, um pré-requisito essencial para promover uma agricultura sustentável. Para isso torna-se necessário conhecer as metodologias de avaliação que mostrem explicitamente as vantagens e desvantagens ambientais, sociais e económicas das diferentes estratégias e sistemas de produção. Nesse sentido, apresenta-se, neste trabalho, as iniciativas de investigação no âmbito da avaliação da sustentabilidade dirigidas, em particular, para o sector agrário. A revisão crítica das mesmas revela que não obstante as várias propostas metodológicas identificadas acusarem importantes esforços para a avaliação da sustentabilidade, visualizando-se semelhanças nalguns dos seus pressupostos, identificam-se, na generalidade, procedimentos díspares, com algumas limitações e debilidades comuns, e a ausência de interacção entre grande parte das abordagens desenvolvidas.<br<Evaluating sustainable development is, at present, an essential prerequisite for promoting sustainable agriculture. For this, it becomes necessary to know the evaluation methodologies that explicitly reflect the environmental, social and economic advantages and disadvantages of different strategies and production systems. In that sense, this work presents research initiatives in the scope of sustainability evaluation in particularly for the agricultural sector. The critical review shows that despite the variety of identified methodological proposals shows some major efforts for the sustainability evaluation, with similarities in some of their assumptions, they confirm, in general, unrelated procedures, with some common limitations and weaknesses and lack of interaction between a large part of the developed approaches. Agricultura sustentável avaliação da sustentabilidade indicadores de sustentabilidade métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade Agriculture sustainable sustainability evaluation sustainability evaluation methods sustainability indicators Agriculture S In Revista de Ciências Agrárias Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal, 2009 33(2010), 2, Seite 75-89 (DE-627)624250911 (DE-600)2548656-1 2183041X nnns volume:33 year:2010 number:2 pages:75-89 https://doaj.org/article/f13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.oces.mctes.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2010000200008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0871-018X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 33 2010 2 75-89 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ052280020 (DE-599)DOAJf13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa verfasserin aut Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Avaliar o desenvolvimento sustentável é, actualmente, um pré-requisito essencial para promover uma agricultura sustentável. Para isso torna-se necessário conhecer as metodologias de avaliação que mostrem explicitamente as vantagens e desvantagens ambientais, sociais e económicas das diferentes estratégias e sistemas de produção. Nesse sentido, apresenta-se, neste trabalho, as iniciativas de investigação no âmbito da avaliação da sustentabilidade dirigidas, em particular, para o sector agrário. A revisão crítica das mesmas revela que não obstante as várias propostas metodológicas identificadas acusarem importantes esforços para a avaliação da sustentabilidade, visualizando-se semelhanças nalguns dos seus pressupostos, identificam-se, na generalidade, procedimentos díspares, com algumas limitações e debilidades comuns, e a ausência de interacção entre grande parte das abordagens desenvolvidas.<br<Evaluating sustainable development is, at present, an essential prerequisite for promoting sustainable agriculture. For this, it becomes necessary to know the evaluation methodologies that explicitly reflect the environmental, social and economic advantages and disadvantages of different strategies and production systems. In that sense, this work presents research initiatives in the scope of sustainability evaluation in particularly for the agricultural sector. The critical review shows that despite the variety of identified methodological proposals shows some major efforts for the sustainability evaluation, with similarities in some of their assumptions, they confirm, in general, unrelated procedures, with some common limitations and weaknesses and lack of interaction between a large part of the developed approaches. Agricultura sustentável avaliação da sustentabilidade indicadores de sustentabilidade métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade Agriculture sustainable sustainability evaluation sustainability evaluation methods sustainability indicators Agriculture S In Revista de Ciências Agrárias Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal, 2009 33(2010), 2, Seite 75-89 (DE-627)624250911 (DE-600)2548656-1 2183041X nnns volume:33 year:2010 number:2 pages:75-89 https://doaj.org/article/f13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.oces.mctes.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2010000200008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0871-018X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 33 2010 2 75-89 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ052280020 (DE-599)DOAJf13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa verfasserin aut Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Avaliar o desenvolvimento sustentável é, actualmente, um pré-requisito essencial para promover uma agricultura sustentável. Para isso torna-se necessário conhecer as metodologias de avaliação que mostrem explicitamente as vantagens e desvantagens ambientais, sociais e económicas das diferentes estratégias e sistemas de produção. Nesse sentido, apresenta-se, neste trabalho, as iniciativas de investigação no âmbito da avaliação da sustentabilidade dirigidas, em particular, para o sector agrário. A revisão crítica das mesmas revela que não obstante as várias propostas metodológicas identificadas acusarem importantes esforços para a avaliação da sustentabilidade, visualizando-se semelhanças nalguns dos seus pressupostos, identificam-se, na generalidade, procedimentos díspares, com algumas limitações e debilidades comuns, e a ausência de interacção entre grande parte das abordagens desenvolvidas.<br<Evaluating sustainable development is, at present, an essential prerequisite for promoting sustainable agriculture. For this, it becomes necessary to know the evaluation methodologies that explicitly reflect the environmental, social and economic advantages and disadvantages of different strategies and production systems. In that sense, this work presents research initiatives in the scope of sustainability evaluation in particularly for the agricultural sector. The critical review shows that despite the variety of identified methodological proposals shows some major efforts for the sustainability evaluation, with similarities in some of their assumptions, they confirm, in general, unrelated procedures, with some common limitations and weaknesses and lack of interaction between a large part of the developed approaches. Agricultura sustentável avaliação da sustentabilidade indicadores de sustentabilidade métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade Agriculture sustainable sustainability evaluation sustainability evaluation methods sustainability indicators Agriculture S In Revista de Ciências Agrárias Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal, 2009 33(2010), 2, Seite 75-89 (DE-627)624250911 (DE-600)2548656-1 2183041X nnns volume:33 year:2010 number:2 pages:75-89 https://doaj.org/article/f13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.oces.mctes.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2010000200008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0871-018X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 33 2010 2 75-89 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ052280020 (DE-599)DOAJf13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa verfasserin aut Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Avaliar o desenvolvimento sustentável é, actualmente, um pré-requisito essencial para promover uma agricultura sustentável. Para isso torna-se necessário conhecer as metodologias de avaliação que mostrem explicitamente as vantagens e desvantagens ambientais, sociais e económicas das diferentes estratégias e sistemas de produção. Nesse sentido, apresenta-se, neste trabalho, as iniciativas de investigação no âmbito da avaliação da sustentabilidade dirigidas, em particular, para o sector agrário. A revisão crítica das mesmas revela que não obstante as várias propostas metodológicas identificadas acusarem importantes esforços para a avaliação da sustentabilidade, visualizando-se semelhanças nalguns dos seus pressupostos, identificam-se, na generalidade, procedimentos díspares, com algumas limitações e debilidades comuns, e a ausência de interacção entre grande parte das abordagens desenvolvidas.<br<Evaluating sustainable development is, at present, an essential prerequisite for promoting sustainable agriculture. For this, it becomes necessary to know the evaluation methodologies that explicitly reflect the environmental, social and economic advantages and disadvantages of different strategies and production systems. In that sense, this work presents research initiatives in the scope of sustainability evaluation in particularly for the agricultural sector. The critical review shows that despite the variety of identified methodological proposals shows some major efforts for the sustainability evaluation, with similarities in some of their assumptions, they confirm, in general, unrelated procedures, with some common limitations and weaknesses and lack of interaction between a large part of the developed approaches. Agricultura sustentável avaliação da sustentabilidade indicadores de sustentabilidade métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade Agriculture sustainable sustainability evaluation sustainability evaluation methods sustainability indicators Agriculture S In Revista de Ciências Agrárias Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal, 2009 33(2010), 2, Seite 75-89 (DE-627)624250911 (DE-600)2548656-1 2183041X nnns volume:33 year:2010 number:2 pages:75-89 https://doaj.org/article/f13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.oces.mctes.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2010000200008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0871-018X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 33 2010 2 75-89 |
| language |
English Spanish Portuguese |
| source |
In Revista de Ciências Agrárias 33(2010), 2, Seite 75-89 volume:33 year:2010 number:2 pages:75-89 |
| sourceStr |
In Revista de Ciências Agrárias 33(2010), 2, Seite 75-89 volume:33 year:2010 number:2 pages:75-89 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Agricultura sustentável avaliação da sustentabilidade indicadores de sustentabilidade métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade Agriculture sustainable sustainability evaluation sustainability evaluation methods sustainability indicators Agriculture S |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Revista de Ciências Agrárias |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
624250911 |
| id |
DOAJ052280020 |
| language_de |
englisch spanisch portugiesisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ052280020</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308164800.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ052280020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Avaliar o desenvolvimento sustentável é, actualmente, um pré-requisito essencial para promover uma agricultura sustentável. Para isso torna-se necessário conhecer as metodologias de avaliação que mostrem explicitamente as vantagens e desvantagens ambientais, sociais e económicas das diferentes estratégias e sistemas de produção. Nesse sentido, apresenta-se, neste trabalho, as iniciativas de investigação no âmbito da avaliação da sustentabilidade dirigidas, em particular, para o sector agrário. A revisão crítica das mesmas revela que não obstante as várias propostas metodológicas identificadas acusarem importantes esforços para a avaliação da sustentabilidade, visualizando-se semelhanças nalguns dos seus pressupostos, identificam-se, na generalidade, procedimentos díspares, com algumas limitações e debilidades comuns, e a ausência de interacção entre grande parte das abordagens desenvolvidas.<br<Evaluating sustainable development is, at present, an essential prerequisite for promoting sustainable agriculture. For this, it becomes necessary to know the evaluation methodologies that explicitly reflect the environmental, social and economic advantages and disadvantages of different strategies and production systems. In that sense, this work presents research initiatives in the scope of sustainability evaluation in particularly for the agricultural sector. The critical review shows that despite the variety of identified methodological proposals shows some major efforts for the sustainability evaluation, with similarities in some of their assumptions, they confirm, in general, unrelated procedures, with some common limitations and weaknesses and lack of interaction between a large part of the developed approaches.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agricultura sustentável</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">avaliação da sustentabilidade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">indicadores de sustentabilidade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agriculture sustainable</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sustainability evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sustainability evaluation methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sustainability indicators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Revista de Ciências Agrárias</subfield><subfield code="d">Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2010), 2, Seite 75-89</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)624250911</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2548656-1</subfield><subfield code="x">2183041X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:75-89</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.oces.mctes.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2010000200008</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0871-018X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">75-89</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa |
| spellingShingle |
Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa misc Agricultura sustentável misc avaliação da sustentabilidade misc indicadores de sustentabilidade misc métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade misc Agriculture sustainable misc sustainability evaluation misc sustainability evaluation methods misc sustainability indicators misc Agriculture misc S Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation |
| authorStr |
Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)624250911 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
2183041X |
| topic_title |
Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation Agricultura sustentável avaliação da sustentabilidade indicadores de sustentabilidade métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade Agriculture sustainable sustainability evaluation sustainability evaluation methods sustainability indicators |
| topic |
misc Agricultura sustentável misc avaliação da sustentabilidade misc indicadores de sustentabilidade misc métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade misc Agriculture sustainable misc sustainability evaluation misc sustainability evaluation methods misc sustainability indicators misc Agriculture misc S |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Agricultura sustentável misc avaliação da sustentabilidade misc indicadores de sustentabilidade misc métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade misc Agriculture sustainable misc sustainability evaluation misc sustainability evaluation methods misc sustainability indicators misc Agriculture misc S |
| topic_browse |
misc Agricultura sustentável misc avaliação da sustentabilidade misc indicadores de sustentabilidade misc métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade misc Agriculture sustainable misc sustainability evaluation misc sustainability evaluation methods misc sustainability indicators misc Agriculture misc S |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Revista de Ciências Agrárias |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
624250911 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Revista de Ciências Agrárias |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)624250911 (DE-600)2548656-1 |
| title |
Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ052280020 (DE-599)DOAJf13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 |
| title_full |
Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation |
| author_sort |
Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa |
| journal |
Revista de Ciências Agrárias |
| journalStr |
Revista de Ciências Agrárias |
| lang_code |
eng spa por |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2010 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
75 |
| author_browse |
Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa |
| container_volume |
33 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa |
| title_sort |
agricultura sustentável ii: avaliação sustainable agriculture ii: evaluation |
| title_auth |
Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation |
| abstract |
Avaliar o desenvolvimento sustentável é, actualmente, um pré-requisito essencial para promover uma agricultura sustentável. Para isso torna-se necessário conhecer as metodologias de avaliação que mostrem explicitamente as vantagens e desvantagens ambientais, sociais e económicas das diferentes estratégias e sistemas de produção. Nesse sentido, apresenta-se, neste trabalho, as iniciativas de investigação no âmbito da avaliação da sustentabilidade dirigidas, em particular, para o sector agrário. A revisão crítica das mesmas revela que não obstante as várias propostas metodológicas identificadas acusarem importantes esforços para a avaliação da sustentabilidade, visualizando-se semelhanças nalguns dos seus pressupostos, identificam-se, na generalidade, procedimentos díspares, com algumas limitações e debilidades comuns, e a ausência de interacção entre grande parte das abordagens desenvolvidas.<br<Evaluating sustainable development is, at present, an essential prerequisite for promoting sustainable agriculture. For this, it becomes necessary to know the evaluation methodologies that explicitly reflect the environmental, social and economic advantages and disadvantages of different strategies and production systems. In that sense, this work presents research initiatives in the scope of sustainability evaluation in particularly for the agricultural sector. The critical review shows that despite the variety of identified methodological proposals shows some major efforts for the sustainability evaluation, with similarities in some of their assumptions, they confirm, in general, unrelated procedures, with some common limitations and weaknesses and lack of interaction between a large part of the developed approaches. |
| abstractGer |
Avaliar o desenvolvimento sustentável é, actualmente, um pré-requisito essencial para promover uma agricultura sustentável. Para isso torna-se necessário conhecer as metodologias de avaliação que mostrem explicitamente as vantagens e desvantagens ambientais, sociais e económicas das diferentes estratégias e sistemas de produção. Nesse sentido, apresenta-se, neste trabalho, as iniciativas de investigação no âmbito da avaliação da sustentabilidade dirigidas, em particular, para o sector agrário. A revisão crítica das mesmas revela que não obstante as várias propostas metodológicas identificadas acusarem importantes esforços para a avaliação da sustentabilidade, visualizando-se semelhanças nalguns dos seus pressupostos, identificam-se, na generalidade, procedimentos díspares, com algumas limitações e debilidades comuns, e a ausência de interacção entre grande parte das abordagens desenvolvidas.<br<Evaluating sustainable development is, at present, an essential prerequisite for promoting sustainable agriculture. For this, it becomes necessary to know the evaluation methodologies that explicitly reflect the environmental, social and economic advantages and disadvantages of different strategies and production systems. In that sense, this work presents research initiatives in the scope of sustainability evaluation in particularly for the agricultural sector. The critical review shows that despite the variety of identified methodological proposals shows some major efforts for the sustainability evaluation, with similarities in some of their assumptions, they confirm, in general, unrelated procedures, with some common limitations and weaknesses and lack of interaction between a large part of the developed approaches. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Avaliar o desenvolvimento sustentável é, actualmente, um pré-requisito essencial para promover uma agricultura sustentável. Para isso torna-se necessário conhecer as metodologias de avaliação que mostrem explicitamente as vantagens e desvantagens ambientais, sociais e económicas das diferentes estratégias e sistemas de produção. Nesse sentido, apresenta-se, neste trabalho, as iniciativas de investigação no âmbito da avaliação da sustentabilidade dirigidas, em particular, para o sector agrário. A revisão crítica das mesmas revela que não obstante as várias propostas metodológicas identificadas acusarem importantes esforços para a avaliação da sustentabilidade, visualizando-se semelhanças nalguns dos seus pressupostos, identificam-se, na generalidade, procedimentos díspares, com algumas limitações e debilidades comuns, e a ausência de interacção entre grande parte das abordagens desenvolvidas.<br<Evaluating sustainable development is, at present, an essential prerequisite for promoting sustainable agriculture. For this, it becomes necessary to know the evaluation methodologies that explicitly reflect the environmental, social and economic advantages and disadvantages of different strategies and production systems. In that sense, this work presents research initiatives in the scope of sustainability evaluation in particularly for the agricultural sector. The critical review shows that despite the variety of identified methodological proposals shows some major efforts for the sustainability evaluation, with similarities in some of their assumptions, they confirm, in general, unrelated procedures, with some common limitations and weaknesses and lack of interaction between a large part of the developed approaches. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/f13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0 http://www.scielo.oces.mctes.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2010000200008 https://doaj.org/toc/0871-018X |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
624250911 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T00:26:56.411Z |
| _version_ |
1803606102025175040 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ052280020</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308164800.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ052280020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ana Alexandra Vilela Marta Rio Costa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agricultura sustentável II: Avaliação Sustainable agriculture II: Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Avaliar o desenvolvimento sustentável é, actualmente, um pré-requisito essencial para promover uma agricultura sustentável. Para isso torna-se necessário conhecer as metodologias de avaliação que mostrem explicitamente as vantagens e desvantagens ambientais, sociais e económicas das diferentes estratégias e sistemas de produção. Nesse sentido, apresenta-se, neste trabalho, as iniciativas de investigação no âmbito da avaliação da sustentabilidade dirigidas, em particular, para o sector agrário. A revisão crítica das mesmas revela que não obstante as várias propostas metodológicas identificadas acusarem importantes esforços para a avaliação da sustentabilidade, visualizando-se semelhanças nalguns dos seus pressupostos, identificam-se, na generalidade, procedimentos díspares, com algumas limitações e debilidades comuns, e a ausência de interacção entre grande parte das abordagens desenvolvidas.<br<Evaluating sustainable development is, at present, an essential prerequisite for promoting sustainable agriculture. For this, it becomes necessary to know the evaluation methodologies that explicitly reflect the environmental, social and economic advantages and disadvantages of different strategies and production systems. In that sense, this work presents research initiatives in the scope of sustainability evaluation in particularly for the agricultural sector. The critical review shows that despite the variety of identified methodological proposals shows some major efforts for the sustainability evaluation, with similarities in some of their assumptions, they confirm, in general, unrelated procedures, with some common limitations and weaknesses and lack of interaction between a large part of the developed approaches.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agricultura sustentável</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">avaliação da sustentabilidade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">indicadores de sustentabilidade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">métodos de avaliação da sustentabilidade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agriculture sustainable</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sustainability evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sustainability evaluation methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sustainability indicators</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Revista de Ciências Agrárias</subfield><subfield code="d">Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">33(2010), 2, Seite 75-89</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)624250911</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2548656-1</subfield><subfield code="x">2183041X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:33</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:75-89</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f13ac033d18c4fd792ac8f05b04a0fa0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.oces.mctes.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2010000200008</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0871-018X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">33</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">75-89</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4019375 |