The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test

In order to investigate the pullout resistance of the Horizontal-Vertical reinforcement, a “denti-geogrid” was assembled by bonding a “denti-strip” with the geogrid and the pullout tests were carried out. Subsequently, the analytical approaches were investigated to calculate the pullout resistance o...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Fang Wei [verfasserIn] Zhang Jingsheng [verfasserIn] Shi Lijun [verfasserIn] Zha Xudong [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	denti-geogrid pullout resistance lab test scale factor theoretical model

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Frontiers in Materials - Frontiers Media S.A., 2014, 8(2021)
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:8 ; year:2021

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3389/fmats.2021.701812

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ052939650

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ052939650
003	DE-627
005	20230308171617.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ052939650
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a Fang Wei \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	4	\|a The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a In order to investigate the pullout resistance of the Horizontal-Vertical reinforcement, a “denti-geogrid” was assembled by bonding a “denti-strip” with the geogrid and the pullout tests were carried out. Subsequently, the analytical approaches were investigated to calculate the pullout resistance on the basis of the surface sliding model, Perterson and Anderson’s model, Jewell’s model, Chai’s model, and the proposed stress summation model. Moreover, a new index named “scale factor” was suggested to reflect the proportion of bearing resistance provided by transversal members. The research showed that: 1) under the same test conditions, the pullout resistance of denti-geogrid was much higher than that of a common geogrid. All common geogrids showed linear strain softening in the later stage of pullout tests. Given the same normal stresses, due to the expansion of effective areas suffering lateral earth pressure, more denti-strips meant more significant resistance; 2) Among five theoretical approaches, the solutions of the proposed stress summation model made the best agreement with lab test results, with an average relative error of 2.82%. On the other hand, the stress summation model also showed a simplicity in calculation; and 3) Due to higher gradient of the fitting curve of scale factors under lower load, the bearing resistance would be more and more dominant, which means that the lateral resistance of denti-strips could play a decisive role in cases of low stress level.
650		4	\|a denti-geogrid
650		4	\|a pullout resistance
650		4	\|a lab test
650		4	\|a scale factor
650		4	\|a theoretical model
653		0	\|a Technology
653		0	\|a T
700	0		\|a Zhang Jingsheng \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Shi Lijun \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Zha Xudong \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Frontiers in Materials \|d Frontiers Media S.A., 2014 \|g 8(2021) \|w (DE-627)779920716 \|w (DE-600)2759394-0 \|x 22968016 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:8 \|g year:2021
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812/full \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2296-8016 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 8 \|j 2021

Indexfelder

author_variant	f w fw z j zj s l sl z x zx
matchkey_str	article:22968016:2021----::hrssacodniegirifreetnsnmdla
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
publishDate	2021
allfields	10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 doi (DE-627)DOAJ052939650 (DE-599)DOAJ92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fang Wei verfasserin aut The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In order to investigate the pullout resistance of the Horizontal-Vertical reinforcement, a “denti-geogrid” was assembled by bonding a “denti-strip” with the geogrid and the pullout tests were carried out. Subsequently, the analytical approaches were investigated to calculate the pullout resistance on the basis of the surface sliding model, Perterson and Anderson’s model, Jewell’s model, Chai’s model, and the proposed stress summation model. Moreover, a new index named “scale factor” was suggested to reflect the proportion of bearing resistance provided by transversal members. The research showed that: 1) under the same test conditions, the pullout resistance of denti-geogrid was much higher than that of a common geogrid. All common geogrids showed linear strain softening in the later stage of pullout tests. Given the same normal stresses, due to the expansion of effective areas suffering lateral earth pressure, more denti-strips meant more significant resistance; 2) Among five theoretical approaches, the solutions of the proposed stress summation model made the best agreement with lab test results, with an average relative error of 2.82%. On the other hand, the stress summation model also showed a simplicity in calculation; and 3) Due to higher gradient of the fitting curve of scale factors under lower load, the bearing resistance would be more and more dominant, which means that the lateral resistance of denti-strips could play a decisive role in cases of low stress level. denti-geogrid pullout resistance lab test scale factor theoretical model Technology T Zhang Jingsheng verfasserin aut Shi Lijun verfasserin aut Zha Xudong verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Materials Frontiers Media S.A., 2014 8(2021) (DE-627)779920716 (DE-600)2759394-0 22968016 nnns volume:8 year:2021 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2296-8016 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2021
spelling	10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 doi (DE-627)DOAJ052939650 (DE-599)DOAJ92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fang Wei verfasserin aut The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In order to investigate the pullout resistance of the Horizontal-Vertical reinforcement, a “denti-geogrid” was assembled by bonding a “denti-strip” with the geogrid and the pullout tests were carried out. Subsequently, the analytical approaches were investigated to calculate the pullout resistance on the basis of the surface sliding model, Perterson and Anderson’s model, Jewell’s model, Chai’s model, and the proposed stress summation model. Moreover, a new index named “scale factor” was suggested to reflect the proportion of bearing resistance provided by transversal members. The research showed that: 1) under the same test conditions, the pullout resistance of denti-geogrid was much higher than that of a common geogrid. All common geogrids showed linear strain softening in the later stage of pullout tests. Given the same normal stresses, due to the expansion of effective areas suffering lateral earth pressure, more denti-strips meant more significant resistance; 2) Among five theoretical approaches, the solutions of the proposed stress summation model made the best agreement with lab test results, with an average relative error of 2.82%. On the other hand, the stress summation model also showed a simplicity in calculation; and 3) Due to higher gradient of the fitting curve of scale factors under lower load, the bearing resistance would be more and more dominant, which means that the lateral resistance of denti-strips could play a decisive role in cases of low stress level. denti-geogrid pullout resistance lab test scale factor theoretical model Technology T Zhang Jingsheng verfasserin aut Shi Lijun verfasserin aut Zha Xudong verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Materials Frontiers Media S.A., 2014 8(2021) (DE-627)779920716 (DE-600)2759394-0 22968016 nnns volume:8 year:2021 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2296-8016 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2021
allfields_unstemmed	10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 doi (DE-627)DOAJ052939650 (DE-599)DOAJ92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fang Wei verfasserin aut The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In order to investigate the pullout resistance of the Horizontal-Vertical reinforcement, a “denti-geogrid” was assembled by bonding a “denti-strip” with the geogrid and the pullout tests were carried out. Subsequently, the analytical approaches were investigated to calculate the pullout resistance on the basis of the surface sliding model, Perterson and Anderson’s model, Jewell’s model, Chai’s model, and the proposed stress summation model. Moreover, a new index named “scale factor” was suggested to reflect the proportion of bearing resistance provided by transversal members. The research showed that: 1) under the same test conditions, the pullout resistance of denti-geogrid was much higher than that of a common geogrid. All common geogrids showed linear strain softening in the later stage of pullout tests. Given the same normal stresses, due to the expansion of effective areas suffering lateral earth pressure, more denti-strips meant more significant resistance; 2) Among five theoretical approaches, the solutions of the proposed stress summation model made the best agreement with lab test results, with an average relative error of 2.82%. On the other hand, the stress summation model also showed a simplicity in calculation; and 3) Due to higher gradient of the fitting curve of scale factors under lower load, the bearing resistance would be more and more dominant, which means that the lateral resistance of denti-strips could play a decisive role in cases of low stress level. denti-geogrid pullout resistance lab test scale factor theoretical model Technology T Zhang Jingsheng verfasserin aut Shi Lijun verfasserin aut Zha Xudong verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Materials Frontiers Media S.A., 2014 8(2021) (DE-627)779920716 (DE-600)2759394-0 22968016 nnns volume:8 year:2021 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2296-8016 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2021
allfieldsGer	10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 doi (DE-627)DOAJ052939650 (DE-599)DOAJ92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fang Wei verfasserin aut The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In order to investigate the pullout resistance of the Horizontal-Vertical reinforcement, a “denti-geogrid” was assembled by bonding a “denti-strip” with the geogrid and the pullout tests were carried out. Subsequently, the analytical approaches were investigated to calculate the pullout resistance on the basis of the surface sliding model, Perterson and Anderson’s model, Jewell’s model, Chai’s model, and the proposed stress summation model. Moreover, a new index named “scale factor” was suggested to reflect the proportion of bearing resistance provided by transversal members. The research showed that: 1) under the same test conditions, the pullout resistance of denti-geogrid was much higher than that of a common geogrid. All common geogrids showed linear strain softening in the later stage of pullout tests. Given the same normal stresses, due to the expansion of effective areas suffering lateral earth pressure, more denti-strips meant more significant resistance; 2) Among five theoretical approaches, the solutions of the proposed stress summation model made the best agreement with lab test results, with an average relative error of 2.82%. On the other hand, the stress summation model also showed a simplicity in calculation; and 3) Due to higher gradient of the fitting curve of scale factors under lower load, the bearing resistance would be more and more dominant, which means that the lateral resistance of denti-strips could play a decisive role in cases of low stress level. denti-geogrid pullout resistance lab test scale factor theoretical model Technology T Zhang Jingsheng verfasserin aut Shi Lijun verfasserin aut Zha Xudong verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Materials Frontiers Media S.A., 2014 8(2021) (DE-627)779920716 (DE-600)2759394-0 22968016 nnns volume:8 year:2021 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2296-8016 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2021
allfieldsSound	10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 doi (DE-627)DOAJ052939650 (DE-599)DOAJ92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Fang Wei verfasserin aut The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In order to investigate the pullout resistance of the Horizontal-Vertical reinforcement, a “denti-geogrid” was assembled by bonding a “denti-strip” with the geogrid and the pullout tests were carried out. Subsequently, the analytical approaches were investigated to calculate the pullout resistance on the basis of the surface sliding model, Perterson and Anderson’s model, Jewell’s model, Chai’s model, and the proposed stress summation model. Moreover, a new index named “scale factor” was suggested to reflect the proportion of bearing resistance provided by transversal members. The research showed that: 1) under the same test conditions, the pullout resistance of denti-geogrid was much higher than that of a common geogrid. All common geogrids showed linear strain softening in the later stage of pullout tests. Given the same normal stresses, due to the expansion of effective areas suffering lateral earth pressure, more denti-strips meant more significant resistance; 2) Among five theoretical approaches, the solutions of the proposed stress summation model made the best agreement with lab test results, with an average relative error of 2.82%. On the other hand, the stress summation model also showed a simplicity in calculation; and 3) Due to higher gradient of the fitting curve of scale factors under lower load, the bearing resistance would be more and more dominant, which means that the lateral resistance of denti-strips could play a decisive role in cases of low stress level. denti-geogrid pullout resistance lab test scale factor theoretical model Technology T Zhang Jingsheng verfasserin aut Shi Lijun verfasserin aut Zha Xudong verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Materials Frontiers Media S.A., 2014 8(2021) (DE-627)779920716 (DE-600)2759394-0 22968016 nnns volume:8 year:2021 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2296-8016 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2021
language	English
source	In Frontiers in Materials 8(2021) volume:8 year:2021
sourceStr	In Frontiers in Materials 8(2021) volume:8 year:2021
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	denti-geogrid pullout resistance lab test scale factor theoretical model Technology T
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Frontiers in Materials
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Fang Wei @@aut@@ Zhang Jingsheng @@aut@@ Shi Lijun @@aut@@ Zha Xudong @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	779920716
id	DOAJ052939650
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ052939650</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308171617.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fmats.2021.701812</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ052939650</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fang Wei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In order to investigate the pullout resistance of the Horizontal-Vertical reinforcement, a “denti-geogrid” was assembled by bonding a “denti-strip” with the geogrid and the pullout tests were carried out. Subsequently, the analytical approaches were investigated to calculate the pullout resistance on the basis of the surface sliding model, Perterson and Anderson’s model, Jewell’s model, Chai’s model, and the proposed stress summation model. Moreover, a new index named “scale factor” was suggested to reflect the proportion of bearing resistance provided by transversal members. The research showed that: 1) under the same test conditions, the pullout resistance of denti-geogrid was much higher than that of a common geogrid. All common geogrids showed linear strain softening in the later stage of pullout tests. Given the same normal stresses, due to the expansion of effective areas suffering lateral earth pressure, more denti-strips meant more significant resistance; 2) Among five theoretical approaches, the solutions of the proposed stress summation model made the best agreement with lab test results, with an average relative error of 2.82%. On the other hand, the stress summation model also showed a simplicity in calculation; and 3) Due to higher gradient of the fitting curve of scale factors under lower load, the bearing resistance would be more and more dominant, which means that the lateral resistance of denti-strips could play a decisive role in cases of low stress level.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">denti-geogrid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pullout resistance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">lab test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scale factor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theoretical model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang Jingsheng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shi Lijun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zha Xudong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Materials</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2021)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)779920716</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2759394-0</subfield><subfield code="x">22968016</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2296-8016</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Fang Wei
spellingShingle	Fang Wei misc denti-geogrid misc pullout resistance misc lab test misc scale factor misc theoretical model misc Technology misc T The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test
authorStr	Fang Wei
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)779920716
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	22968016
topic_title	The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test denti-geogrid pullout resistance lab test scale factor theoretical model
topic	misc denti-geogrid misc pullout resistance misc lab test misc scale factor misc theoretical model misc Technology misc T
topic_unstemmed	misc denti-geogrid misc pullout resistance misc lab test misc scale factor misc theoretical model misc Technology misc T
topic_browse	misc denti-geogrid misc pullout resistance misc lab test misc scale factor misc theoretical model misc Technology misc T
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Frontiers in Materials
hierarchy_parent_id	779920716
hierarchy_top_title	Frontiers in Materials
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)779920716 (DE-600)2759394-0
title	The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ052939650 (DE-599)DOAJ92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec
title_full	The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test
author_sort	Fang Wei
journal	Frontiers in Materials
journalStr	Frontiers in Materials
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Fang Wei Zhang Jingsheng Shi Lijun Zha Xudong
container_volume	8
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Fang Wei
doi_str_mv	10.3389/fmats.2021.701812
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	resistance of denti-geogrid reinforcement in a sand model based on the pullout test
title_auth	The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test
abstract	In order to investigate the pullout resistance of the Horizontal-Vertical reinforcement, a “denti-geogrid” was assembled by bonding a “denti-strip” with the geogrid and the pullout tests were carried out. Subsequently, the analytical approaches were investigated to calculate the pullout resistance on the basis of the surface sliding model, Perterson and Anderson’s model, Jewell’s model, Chai’s model, and the proposed stress summation model. Moreover, a new index named “scale factor” was suggested to reflect the proportion of bearing resistance provided by transversal members. The research showed that: 1) under the same test conditions, the pullout resistance of denti-geogrid was much higher than that of a common geogrid. All common geogrids showed linear strain softening in the later stage of pullout tests. Given the same normal stresses, due to the expansion of effective areas suffering lateral earth pressure, more denti-strips meant more significant resistance; 2) Among five theoretical approaches, the solutions of the proposed stress summation model made the best agreement with lab test results, with an average relative error of 2.82%. On the other hand, the stress summation model also showed a simplicity in calculation; and 3) Due to higher gradient of the fitting curve of scale factors under lower load, the bearing resistance would be more and more dominant, which means that the lateral resistance of denti-strips could play a decisive role in cases of low stress level.
abstractGer	In order to investigate the pullout resistance of the Horizontal-Vertical reinforcement, a “denti-geogrid” was assembled by bonding a “denti-strip” with the geogrid and the pullout tests were carried out. Subsequently, the analytical approaches were investigated to calculate the pullout resistance on the basis of the surface sliding model, Perterson and Anderson’s model, Jewell’s model, Chai’s model, and the proposed stress summation model. Moreover, a new index named “scale factor” was suggested to reflect the proportion of bearing resistance provided by transversal members. The research showed that: 1) under the same test conditions, the pullout resistance of denti-geogrid was much higher than that of a common geogrid. All common geogrids showed linear strain softening in the later stage of pullout tests. Given the same normal stresses, due to the expansion of effective areas suffering lateral earth pressure, more denti-strips meant more significant resistance; 2) Among five theoretical approaches, the solutions of the proposed stress summation model made the best agreement with lab test results, with an average relative error of 2.82%. On the other hand, the stress summation model also showed a simplicity in calculation; and 3) Due to higher gradient of the fitting curve of scale factors under lower load, the bearing resistance would be more and more dominant, which means that the lateral resistance of denti-strips could play a decisive role in cases of low stress level.
abstract_unstemmed	In order to investigate the pullout resistance of the Horizontal-Vertical reinforcement, a “denti-geogrid” was assembled by bonding a “denti-strip” with the geogrid and the pullout tests were carried out. Subsequently, the analytical approaches were investigated to calculate the pullout resistance on the basis of the surface sliding model, Perterson and Anderson’s model, Jewell’s model, Chai’s model, and the proposed stress summation model. Moreover, a new index named “scale factor” was suggested to reflect the proportion of bearing resistance provided by transversal members. The research showed that: 1) under the same test conditions, the pullout resistance of denti-geogrid was much higher than that of a common geogrid. All common geogrids showed linear strain softening in the later stage of pullout tests. Given the same normal stresses, due to the expansion of effective areas suffering lateral earth pressure, more denti-strips meant more significant resistance; 2) Among five theoretical approaches, the solutions of the proposed stress summation model made the best agreement with lab test results, with an average relative error of 2.82%. On the other hand, the stress summation model also showed a simplicity in calculation; and 3) Due to higher gradient of the fitting curve of scale factors under lower load, the bearing resistance would be more and more dominant, which means that the lateral resistance of denti-strips could play a decisive role in cases of low stress level.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test
url	https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812 https://doaj.org/article/92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812/full https://doaj.org/toc/2296-8016
remote_bool	true
author2	Zhang Jingsheng Shi Lijun Zha Xudong
author2Str	Zhang Jingsheng Shi Lijun Zha Xudong
ppnlink	779920716
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3389/fmats.2021.701812
up_date	2024-07-03T14:54:22.488Z
_version_	1803570079323914240
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ052939650</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308171617.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fmats.2021.701812</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ052939650</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fang Wei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In order to investigate the pullout resistance of the Horizontal-Vertical reinforcement, a “denti-geogrid” was assembled by bonding a “denti-strip” with the geogrid and the pullout tests were carried out. Subsequently, the analytical approaches were investigated to calculate the pullout resistance on the basis of the surface sliding model, Perterson and Anderson’s model, Jewell’s model, Chai’s model, and the proposed stress summation model. Moreover, a new index named “scale factor” was suggested to reflect the proportion of bearing resistance provided by transversal members. The research showed that: 1) under the same test conditions, the pullout resistance of denti-geogrid was much higher than that of a common geogrid. All common geogrids showed linear strain softening in the later stage of pullout tests. Given the same normal stresses, due to the expansion of effective areas suffering lateral earth pressure, more denti-strips meant more significant resistance; 2) Among five theoretical approaches, the solutions of the proposed stress summation model made the best agreement with lab test results, with an average relative error of 2.82%. On the other hand, the stress summation model also showed a simplicity in calculation; and 3) Due to higher gradient of the fitting curve of scale factors under lower load, the bearing resistance would be more and more dominant, which means that the lateral resistance of denti-strips could play a decisive role in cases of low stress level.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">denti-geogrid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pullout resistance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">lab test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">scale factor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theoretical model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhang Jingsheng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shi Lijun</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zha Xudong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Materials</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2021)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)779920716</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2759394-0</subfield><subfield code="x">22968016</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/92846ad42f0347ffa2464df05bbd17ec</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2021.701812/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2296-8016</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399292

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

The Resistance of Denti-Geogrid Reinforcement in a Sand Model Based on the Pullout Test

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?