Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791
The article analyzes the supreme bodies of state power under the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and the Constitution of Poland of 1791 concerning the application of the principle of separation of state power into legislative, executive and judicial braches. The principle of separation of state...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Анатолій Іванович Козаченко [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Russisch ; Ukrainisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Проблеми Законності - Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 2018, (2019), 144, Seite 8-17 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2019 ; number:144 ; pages:8-17 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ052976645 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ052976645 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230502131939.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ052976645 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJc5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a rus |a ukr | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Анатолій Іванович Козаченко |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The article analyzes the supreme bodies of state power under the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and the Constitution of Poland of 1791 concerning the application of the principle of separation of state power into legislative, executive and judicial braches. The principle of separation of state power was introduced in these constitutions which were based on the own state and legal experience and ideas of the Western European political and legal thought of the Age of Enlightenment. In practice of the European constitutionalism, the Constitution of Pylyp Orlik of 1710 was the first attempt to adopt a constitution providing separation of state power into three branches (legislative, executive and judicial) as well as a system of checks and balances. Introducing the state power mechanism was aimed at the attempts of Cossack officers to increase the efficiency of state power and prevent usurpation of power by both a hetman and particular groups of Cossack officers. The Polish Constitution of 1791 was based on the idea of rule of the people, which is the only source of power, and the idea of separation of state power into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. The legislature – the Seim, the executive power – the King and Government and the judiciary – local and higher courts are autonomous towards each other. None of the public powers could assign another body’s authorities. The mechanism of the system of checks and balances operated through parliamentary bicameralism, the Government formation by the King and Seim, participation of the King in the Government, the Seim deputies did not have the right to hold positions in executive bodies, different terms of authorities of the legislative, executive and judicial bodies. Such a mechanism was intended to prevent the usurpation of power by a single body or person and, most importantly, to improve the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis and strengthen the Polish statehood. Constituting the separation of state power in the Ukrainian and Polish Constitutions of the eighteenth century was aimed at improving the state mechanism, preventing the possibility of usurpation of power within the country, increasing the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk | |
| 650 | 4 | |a government body | |
| 650 | 4 | |a separation of powers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a legislature | |
| 650 | 4 | |a executive power | |
| 650 | 4 | |a judiciary | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Law | |
| 653 | 0 | |a K | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Проблеми Законності |d Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 2018 |g (2019), 144, Seite 8-17 |w (DE-627)877391696 |w (DE-600)2881038-7 |x 2414990X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2019 |g number:144 |g pages:8-17 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/c5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/154647 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2224-9281 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2414-990X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_90 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_100 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_101 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_120 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_138 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_184 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_187 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_250 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_281 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_370 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_374 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_647 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_702 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2001 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2006 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2863 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4035 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4753 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2019 |e 144 |h 8-17 | ||
| author_variant |
а і к аік |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:2414990X:2019----::rnilosprtoosaeoeudrosiuinfyyolkf70 |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 doi (DE-627)DOAJ052976645 (DE-599)DOAJc5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr Анатолій Іванович Козаченко verfasserin aut Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyzes the supreme bodies of state power under the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and the Constitution of Poland of 1791 concerning the application of the principle of separation of state power into legislative, executive and judicial braches. The principle of separation of state power was introduced in these constitutions which were based on the own state and legal experience and ideas of the Western European political and legal thought of the Age of Enlightenment. In practice of the European constitutionalism, the Constitution of Pylyp Orlik of 1710 was the first attempt to adopt a constitution providing separation of state power into three branches (legislative, executive and judicial) as well as a system of checks and balances. Introducing the state power mechanism was aimed at the attempts of Cossack officers to increase the efficiency of state power and prevent usurpation of power by both a hetman and particular groups of Cossack officers. The Polish Constitution of 1791 was based on the idea of rule of the people, which is the only source of power, and the idea of separation of state power into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. The legislature – the Seim, the executive power – the King and Government and the judiciary – local and higher courts are autonomous towards each other. None of the public powers could assign another body’s authorities. The mechanism of the system of checks and balances operated through parliamentary bicameralism, the Government formation by the King and Seim, participation of the King in the Government, the Seim deputies did not have the right to hold positions in executive bodies, different terms of authorities of the legislative, executive and judicial bodies. Such a mechanism was intended to prevent the usurpation of power by a single body or person and, most importantly, to improve the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis and strengthen the Polish statehood. Constituting the separation of state power in the Ukrainian and Polish Constitutions of the eighteenth century was aimed at improving the state mechanism, preventing the possibility of usurpation of power within the country, increasing the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis. Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk government body separation of powers legislature executive power judiciary Law K In Проблеми Законності Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 2018 (2019), 144, Seite 8-17 (DE-627)877391696 (DE-600)2881038-7 2414990X nnns year:2019 number:144 pages:8-17 https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 kostenfrei http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/154647 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2224-9281 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2414-990X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2019 144 8-17 |
| spelling |
10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 doi (DE-627)DOAJ052976645 (DE-599)DOAJc5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr Анатолій Іванович Козаченко verfasserin aut Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyzes the supreme bodies of state power under the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and the Constitution of Poland of 1791 concerning the application of the principle of separation of state power into legislative, executive and judicial braches. The principle of separation of state power was introduced in these constitutions which were based on the own state and legal experience and ideas of the Western European political and legal thought of the Age of Enlightenment. In practice of the European constitutionalism, the Constitution of Pylyp Orlik of 1710 was the first attempt to adopt a constitution providing separation of state power into three branches (legislative, executive and judicial) as well as a system of checks and balances. Introducing the state power mechanism was aimed at the attempts of Cossack officers to increase the efficiency of state power and prevent usurpation of power by both a hetman and particular groups of Cossack officers. The Polish Constitution of 1791 was based on the idea of rule of the people, which is the only source of power, and the idea of separation of state power into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. The legislature – the Seim, the executive power – the King and Government and the judiciary – local and higher courts are autonomous towards each other. None of the public powers could assign another body’s authorities. The mechanism of the system of checks and balances operated through parliamentary bicameralism, the Government formation by the King and Seim, participation of the King in the Government, the Seim deputies did not have the right to hold positions in executive bodies, different terms of authorities of the legislative, executive and judicial bodies. Such a mechanism was intended to prevent the usurpation of power by a single body or person and, most importantly, to improve the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis and strengthen the Polish statehood. Constituting the separation of state power in the Ukrainian and Polish Constitutions of the eighteenth century was aimed at improving the state mechanism, preventing the possibility of usurpation of power within the country, increasing the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis. Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk government body separation of powers legislature executive power judiciary Law K In Проблеми Законності Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 2018 (2019), 144, Seite 8-17 (DE-627)877391696 (DE-600)2881038-7 2414990X nnns year:2019 number:144 pages:8-17 https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 kostenfrei http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/154647 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2224-9281 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2414-990X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2019 144 8-17 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 doi (DE-627)DOAJ052976645 (DE-599)DOAJc5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr Анатолій Іванович Козаченко verfasserin aut Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyzes the supreme bodies of state power under the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and the Constitution of Poland of 1791 concerning the application of the principle of separation of state power into legislative, executive and judicial braches. The principle of separation of state power was introduced in these constitutions which were based on the own state and legal experience and ideas of the Western European political and legal thought of the Age of Enlightenment. In practice of the European constitutionalism, the Constitution of Pylyp Orlik of 1710 was the first attempt to adopt a constitution providing separation of state power into three branches (legislative, executive and judicial) as well as a system of checks and balances. Introducing the state power mechanism was aimed at the attempts of Cossack officers to increase the efficiency of state power and prevent usurpation of power by both a hetman and particular groups of Cossack officers. The Polish Constitution of 1791 was based on the idea of rule of the people, which is the only source of power, and the idea of separation of state power into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. The legislature – the Seim, the executive power – the King and Government and the judiciary – local and higher courts are autonomous towards each other. None of the public powers could assign another body’s authorities. The mechanism of the system of checks and balances operated through parliamentary bicameralism, the Government formation by the King and Seim, participation of the King in the Government, the Seim deputies did not have the right to hold positions in executive bodies, different terms of authorities of the legislative, executive and judicial bodies. Such a mechanism was intended to prevent the usurpation of power by a single body or person and, most importantly, to improve the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis and strengthen the Polish statehood. Constituting the separation of state power in the Ukrainian and Polish Constitutions of the eighteenth century was aimed at improving the state mechanism, preventing the possibility of usurpation of power within the country, increasing the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis. Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk government body separation of powers legislature executive power judiciary Law K In Проблеми Законності Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 2018 (2019), 144, Seite 8-17 (DE-627)877391696 (DE-600)2881038-7 2414990X nnns year:2019 number:144 pages:8-17 https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 kostenfrei http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/154647 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2224-9281 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2414-990X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2019 144 8-17 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 doi (DE-627)DOAJ052976645 (DE-599)DOAJc5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr Анатолій Іванович Козаченко verfasserin aut Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyzes the supreme bodies of state power under the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and the Constitution of Poland of 1791 concerning the application of the principle of separation of state power into legislative, executive and judicial braches. The principle of separation of state power was introduced in these constitutions which were based on the own state and legal experience and ideas of the Western European political and legal thought of the Age of Enlightenment. In practice of the European constitutionalism, the Constitution of Pylyp Orlik of 1710 was the first attempt to adopt a constitution providing separation of state power into three branches (legislative, executive and judicial) as well as a system of checks and balances. Introducing the state power mechanism was aimed at the attempts of Cossack officers to increase the efficiency of state power and prevent usurpation of power by both a hetman and particular groups of Cossack officers. The Polish Constitution of 1791 was based on the idea of rule of the people, which is the only source of power, and the idea of separation of state power into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. The legislature – the Seim, the executive power – the King and Government and the judiciary – local and higher courts are autonomous towards each other. None of the public powers could assign another body’s authorities. The mechanism of the system of checks and balances operated through parliamentary bicameralism, the Government formation by the King and Seim, participation of the King in the Government, the Seim deputies did not have the right to hold positions in executive bodies, different terms of authorities of the legislative, executive and judicial bodies. Such a mechanism was intended to prevent the usurpation of power by a single body or person and, most importantly, to improve the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis and strengthen the Polish statehood. Constituting the separation of state power in the Ukrainian and Polish Constitutions of the eighteenth century was aimed at improving the state mechanism, preventing the possibility of usurpation of power within the country, increasing the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis. Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk government body separation of powers legislature executive power judiciary Law K In Проблеми Законності Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 2018 (2019), 144, Seite 8-17 (DE-627)877391696 (DE-600)2881038-7 2414990X nnns year:2019 number:144 pages:8-17 https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 kostenfrei http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/154647 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2224-9281 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2414-990X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2019 144 8-17 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 doi (DE-627)DOAJ052976645 (DE-599)DOAJc5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr Анатолій Іванович Козаченко verfasserin aut Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article analyzes the supreme bodies of state power under the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and the Constitution of Poland of 1791 concerning the application of the principle of separation of state power into legislative, executive and judicial braches. The principle of separation of state power was introduced in these constitutions which were based on the own state and legal experience and ideas of the Western European political and legal thought of the Age of Enlightenment. In practice of the European constitutionalism, the Constitution of Pylyp Orlik of 1710 was the first attempt to adopt a constitution providing separation of state power into three branches (legislative, executive and judicial) as well as a system of checks and balances. Introducing the state power mechanism was aimed at the attempts of Cossack officers to increase the efficiency of state power and prevent usurpation of power by both a hetman and particular groups of Cossack officers. The Polish Constitution of 1791 was based on the idea of rule of the people, which is the only source of power, and the idea of separation of state power into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. The legislature – the Seim, the executive power – the King and Government and the judiciary – local and higher courts are autonomous towards each other. None of the public powers could assign another body’s authorities. The mechanism of the system of checks and balances operated through parliamentary bicameralism, the Government formation by the King and Seim, participation of the King in the Government, the Seim deputies did not have the right to hold positions in executive bodies, different terms of authorities of the legislative, executive and judicial bodies. Such a mechanism was intended to prevent the usurpation of power by a single body or person and, most importantly, to improve the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis and strengthen the Polish statehood. Constituting the separation of state power in the Ukrainian and Polish Constitutions of the eighteenth century was aimed at improving the state mechanism, preventing the possibility of usurpation of power within the country, increasing the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis. Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk government body separation of powers legislature executive power judiciary Law K In Проблеми Законності Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 2018 (2019), 144, Seite 8-17 (DE-627)877391696 (DE-600)2881038-7 2414990X nnns year:2019 number:144 pages:8-17 https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 kostenfrei http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/154647 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2224-9281 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2414-990X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2019 144 8-17 |
| language |
English Russian Ukrainian |
| source |
In Проблеми Законності (2019), 144, Seite 8-17 year:2019 number:144 pages:8-17 |
| sourceStr |
In Проблеми Законності (2019), 144, Seite 8-17 year:2019 number:144 pages:8-17 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk government body separation of powers legislature executive power judiciary Law K |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Проблеми Законності |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Анатолій Іванович Козаченко @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
877391696 |
| id |
DOAJ052976645 |
| language_de |
englisch russisch ukrainisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ052976645</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502131939.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ052976645</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJc5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Анатолій Іванович Козаченко</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article analyzes the supreme bodies of state power under the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and the Constitution of Poland of 1791 concerning the application of the principle of separation of state power into legislative, executive and judicial braches. The principle of separation of state power was introduced in these constitutions which were based on the own state and legal experience and ideas of the Western European political and legal thought of the Age of Enlightenment. In practice of the European constitutionalism, the Constitution of Pylyp Orlik of 1710 was the first attempt to adopt a constitution providing separation of state power into three branches (legislative, executive and judicial) as well as a system of checks and balances. Introducing the state power mechanism was aimed at the attempts of Cossack officers to increase the efficiency of state power and prevent usurpation of power by both a hetman and particular groups of Cossack officers. The Polish Constitution of 1791 was based on the idea of rule of the people, which is the only source of power, and the idea of separation of state power into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. The legislature – the Seim, the executive power – the King and Government and the judiciary – local and higher courts are autonomous towards each other. None of the public powers could assign another body’s authorities. The mechanism of the system of checks and balances operated through parliamentary bicameralism, the Government formation by the King and Seim, participation of the King in the Government, the Seim deputies did not have the right to hold positions in executive bodies, different terms of authorities of the legislative, executive and judicial bodies. Such a mechanism was intended to prevent the usurpation of power by a single body or person and, most importantly, to improve the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis and strengthen the Polish statehood. Constituting the separation of state power in the Ukrainian and Polish Constitutions of the eighteenth century was aimed at improving the state mechanism, preventing the possibility of usurpation of power within the country, increasing the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">government body</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">separation of powers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">legislature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">executive power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">judiciary</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Проблеми Законності</subfield><subfield code="d">Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">(2019), 144, Seite 8-17</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)877391696</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2881038-7</subfield><subfield code="x">2414990X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:144</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:8-17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/c5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/154647</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2224-9281</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2414-990X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_647</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">144</subfield><subfield code="h">8-17</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Анатолій Іванович Козаченко |
| spellingShingle |
Анатолій Іванович Козаченко misc Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk misc government body misc separation of powers misc legislature misc executive power misc judiciary misc Law misc K Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791 |
| authorStr |
Анатолій Іванович Козаченко |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)877391696 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
2414990X |
| topic_title |
Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791 Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk government body separation of powers legislature executive power judiciary |
| topic |
misc Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk misc government body misc separation of powers misc legislature misc executive power misc judiciary misc Law misc K |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk misc government body misc separation of powers misc legislature misc executive power misc judiciary misc Law misc K |
| topic_browse |
misc Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk misc government body misc separation of powers misc legislature misc executive power misc judiciary misc Law misc K |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Проблеми Законності |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
877391696 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Проблеми Законності |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)877391696 (DE-600)2881038-7 |
| title |
Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791 |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ052976645 (DE-599)DOAJc5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 |
| title_full |
Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791 |
| author_sort |
Анатолій Іванович Козаченко |
| journal |
Проблеми Законності |
| journalStr |
Проблеми Законності |
| lang_code |
eng rus ukr |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
8 |
| author_browse |
Анатолій Іванович Козаченко |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Анатолій Іванович Козаченко |
| doi_str_mv |
10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 |
| title_sort |
principle of separation of state power under constitution of pylyp orlyk of 1710 and polish constitution of 1791 |
| title_auth |
Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791 |
| abstract |
The article analyzes the supreme bodies of state power under the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and the Constitution of Poland of 1791 concerning the application of the principle of separation of state power into legislative, executive and judicial braches. The principle of separation of state power was introduced in these constitutions which were based on the own state and legal experience and ideas of the Western European political and legal thought of the Age of Enlightenment. In practice of the European constitutionalism, the Constitution of Pylyp Orlik of 1710 was the first attempt to adopt a constitution providing separation of state power into three branches (legislative, executive and judicial) as well as a system of checks and balances. Introducing the state power mechanism was aimed at the attempts of Cossack officers to increase the efficiency of state power and prevent usurpation of power by both a hetman and particular groups of Cossack officers. The Polish Constitution of 1791 was based on the idea of rule of the people, which is the only source of power, and the idea of separation of state power into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. The legislature – the Seim, the executive power – the King and Government and the judiciary – local and higher courts are autonomous towards each other. None of the public powers could assign another body’s authorities. The mechanism of the system of checks and balances operated through parliamentary bicameralism, the Government formation by the King and Seim, participation of the King in the Government, the Seim deputies did not have the right to hold positions in executive bodies, different terms of authorities of the legislative, executive and judicial bodies. Such a mechanism was intended to prevent the usurpation of power by a single body or person and, most importantly, to improve the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis and strengthen the Polish statehood. Constituting the separation of state power in the Ukrainian and Polish Constitutions of the eighteenth century was aimed at improving the state mechanism, preventing the possibility of usurpation of power within the country, increasing the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis. |
| abstractGer |
The article analyzes the supreme bodies of state power under the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and the Constitution of Poland of 1791 concerning the application of the principle of separation of state power into legislative, executive and judicial braches. The principle of separation of state power was introduced in these constitutions which were based on the own state and legal experience and ideas of the Western European political and legal thought of the Age of Enlightenment. In practice of the European constitutionalism, the Constitution of Pylyp Orlik of 1710 was the first attempt to adopt a constitution providing separation of state power into three branches (legislative, executive and judicial) as well as a system of checks and balances. Introducing the state power mechanism was aimed at the attempts of Cossack officers to increase the efficiency of state power and prevent usurpation of power by both a hetman and particular groups of Cossack officers. The Polish Constitution of 1791 was based on the idea of rule of the people, which is the only source of power, and the idea of separation of state power into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. The legislature – the Seim, the executive power – the King and Government and the judiciary – local and higher courts are autonomous towards each other. None of the public powers could assign another body’s authorities. The mechanism of the system of checks and balances operated through parliamentary bicameralism, the Government formation by the King and Seim, participation of the King in the Government, the Seim deputies did not have the right to hold positions in executive bodies, different terms of authorities of the legislative, executive and judicial bodies. Such a mechanism was intended to prevent the usurpation of power by a single body or person and, most importantly, to improve the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis and strengthen the Polish statehood. Constituting the separation of state power in the Ukrainian and Polish Constitutions of the eighteenth century was aimed at improving the state mechanism, preventing the possibility of usurpation of power within the country, increasing the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The article analyzes the supreme bodies of state power under the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and the Constitution of Poland of 1791 concerning the application of the principle of separation of state power into legislative, executive and judicial braches. The principle of separation of state power was introduced in these constitutions which were based on the own state and legal experience and ideas of the Western European political and legal thought of the Age of Enlightenment. In practice of the European constitutionalism, the Constitution of Pylyp Orlik of 1710 was the first attempt to adopt a constitution providing separation of state power into three branches (legislative, executive and judicial) as well as a system of checks and balances. Introducing the state power mechanism was aimed at the attempts of Cossack officers to increase the efficiency of state power and prevent usurpation of power by both a hetman and particular groups of Cossack officers. The Polish Constitution of 1791 was based on the idea of rule of the people, which is the only source of power, and the idea of separation of state power into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. The legislature – the Seim, the executive power – the King and Government and the judiciary – local and higher courts are autonomous towards each other. None of the public powers could assign another body’s authorities. The mechanism of the system of checks and balances operated through parliamentary bicameralism, the Government formation by the King and Seim, participation of the King in the Government, the Seim deputies did not have the right to hold positions in executive bodies, different terms of authorities of the legislative, executive and judicial bodies. Such a mechanism was intended to prevent the usurpation of power by a single body or person and, most importantly, to improve the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis and strengthen the Polish statehood. Constituting the separation of state power in the Ukrainian and Polish Constitutions of the eighteenth century was aimed at improving the state mechanism, preventing the possibility of usurpation of power within the country, increasing the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_90 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_100 GBV_ILN_101 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_120 GBV_ILN_138 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_187 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_250 GBV_ILN_281 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_374 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_647 GBV_ILN_702 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 |
| container_issue |
144 |
| title_short |
Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 https://doaj.org/article/c5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210 http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/154647 https://doaj.org/toc/2224-9281 https://doaj.org/toc/2414-990X |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
877391696 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:06:03.993Z |
| _version_ |
1803570814906269696 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ052976645</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502131939.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ052976645</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJc5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Анатолій Іванович Козаченко</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Principle of Separation of State Power under Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and Polish Constitution of 1791</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article analyzes the supreme bodies of state power under the Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk of 1710 and the Constitution of Poland of 1791 concerning the application of the principle of separation of state power into legislative, executive and judicial braches. The principle of separation of state power was introduced in these constitutions which were based on the own state and legal experience and ideas of the Western European political and legal thought of the Age of Enlightenment. In practice of the European constitutionalism, the Constitution of Pylyp Orlik of 1710 was the first attempt to adopt a constitution providing separation of state power into three branches (legislative, executive and judicial) as well as a system of checks and balances. Introducing the state power mechanism was aimed at the attempts of Cossack officers to increase the efficiency of state power and prevent usurpation of power by both a hetman and particular groups of Cossack officers. The Polish Constitution of 1791 was based on the idea of rule of the people, which is the only source of power, and the idea of separation of state power into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. The legislature – the Seim, the executive power – the King and Government and the judiciary – local and higher courts are autonomous towards each other. None of the public powers could assign another body’s authorities. The mechanism of the system of checks and balances operated through parliamentary bicameralism, the Government formation by the King and Seim, participation of the King in the Government, the Seim deputies did not have the right to hold positions in executive bodies, different terms of authorities of the legislative, executive and judicial bodies. Such a mechanism was intended to prevent the usurpation of power by a single body or person and, most importantly, to improve the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis and strengthen the Polish statehood. Constituting the separation of state power in the Ukrainian and Polish Constitutions of the eighteenth century was aimed at improving the state mechanism, preventing the possibility of usurpation of power within the country, increasing the effectiveness of the state mechanism in order to withdraw the country from the political crisis.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">government body</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">separation of powers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">legislature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">executive power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">judiciary</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Проблеми Законності</subfield><subfield code="d">Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">(2019), 144, Seite 8-17</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)877391696</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2881038-7</subfield><subfield code="x">2414990X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:144</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:8-17</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.144.154647</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/c5883feacc49454da9350e3b3fe89210</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/154647</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2224-9281</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2414-990X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_138</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_250</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_647</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_702</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">144</subfield><subfield code="h">8-17</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399907 |