Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers

We applied seven pairs of primer-restriction enzyme combinations to investigate the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of Prunus padus populations with AFLP markers. The values obtained for average of effective alleles (Ae), percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Shannon...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Ji-young Ahn [verfasserIn] Jei-Wan Lee [verfasserIn] Hyo-In Lim [verfasserIn] Kyung-Nak Hong [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	sexual and asexual reproduction genetic variation demographic disturbance insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals medicinal plant

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Forest Science and Technology - Taylor & Francis Group, 2018, 16(2020), 4, Seite 171-179
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:16 ; year:2020 ; number:4 ; pages:171-179

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ053372786

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ053372786
003	DE-627
005	20230308173654.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ053372786
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a SD1-669.5
100	0		\|a Ji-young Ahn \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a We applied seven pairs of primer-restriction enzyme combinations to investigate the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of Prunus padus populations with AFLP markers. The values obtained for average of effective alleles (Ae), percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Shannon’s diversity index (I), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 1.38, 81.4, 0.357, and 0.223%, respectively. The expected heterozygosity (Hj) obtained by using a Bayesian method was 0.256. The level of genetic diversity obtained for P. padus was low compared to that of Prunus species and other species with a similar life history. The inbreeding coefficient (FIS) from the approximated Bayesian method was 0.767. This value was lower than that obtained for Ulmus davidiana, which undergoes both sexual and asexual reproduction. However, the value obtained was larger than that for other species that undergo sexual reproduction, such as, Carpinus laxiflora, Phellodendron amurense, and Acer pseudosieboldianum. The value of genetic differentiation was 0.245 from AMOVA (ΦST) and 0.278 from Bayesian method (θII). The obtained level of genetic differentiation was large compared to that of other Prunus species plants and other species with a similar life history. According to UPGMA and Bayesian clustering, 11 populations were divided into two genetic groups. However, some populations were detected as weak genetic structures according to the geographical distribution. It was occurred by forest succession, asexual propagation strategies to adapt local environmental change, and gene flow being gradually decreased due to population fragmentation by demographic disturbances.
650		4	\|a sexual and asexual reproduction
650		4	\|a genetic variation
650		4	\|a demographic disturbance
650		4	\|a insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals
650		4	\|a medicinal plant
653		0	\|a Forestry
700	0		\|a Jei-Wan Lee \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Hyo-In Lim \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Kyung-Nak Hong \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Forest Science and Technology \|d Taylor & Francis Group, 2018 \|g 16(2020), 4, Seite 171-179 \|w (DE-627)718580524 \|w (DE-600)2658417-7 \|x 21580715 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:16 \|g year:2020 \|g number:4 \|g pages:171-179
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0103 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0715 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 16 \|j 2020 \|e 4 \|h 171-179

Indexfelder

author_variant	j y a jya j w l jwl h i l hil k n h knh
matchkey_str	article:21580715:2020----::eeidvriynsrcuefrnsauppltosnotk
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
callnumber-subject-code	SD
publishDate	2020
allfields	10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 doi (DE-627)DOAJ053372786 (DE-599)DOAJ8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 Ji-young Ahn verfasserin aut Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We applied seven pairs of primer-restriction enzyme combinations to investigate the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of Prunus padus populations with AFLP markers. The values obtained for average of effective alleles (Ae), percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Shannon’s diversity index (I), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 1.38, 81.4, 0.357, and 0.223%, respectively. The expected heterozygosity (Hj) obtained by using a Bayesian method was 0.256. The level of genetic diversity obtained for P. padus was low compared to that of Prunus species and other species with a similar life history. The inbreeding coefficient (FIS) from the approximated Bayesian method was 0.767. This value was lower than that obtained for Ulmus davidiana, which undergoes both sexual and asexual reproduction. However, the value obtained was larger than that for other species that undergo sexual reproduction, such as, Carpinus laxiflora, Phellodendron amurense, and Acer pseudosieboldianum. The value of genetic differentiation was 0.245 from AMOVA (ΦST) and 0.278 from Bayesian method (θII). The obtained level of genetic differentiation was large compared to that of other Prunus species plants and other species with a similar life history. According to UPGMA and Bayesian clustering, 11 populations were divided into two genetic groups. However, some populations were detected as weak genetic structures according to the geographical distribution. It was occurred by forest succession, asexual propagation strategies to adapt local environmental change, and gene flow being gradually decreased due to population fragmentation by demographic disturbances. sexual and asexual reproduction genetic variation demographic disturbance insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals medicinal plant Forestry Jei-Wan Lee verfasserin aut Hyo-In Lim verfasserin aut Kyung-Nak Hong verfasserin aut In Forest Science and Technology Taylor & Francis Group, 2018 16(2020), 4, Seite 171-179 (DE-627)718580524 (DE-600)2658417-7 21580715 nnns volume:16 year:2020 number:4 pages:171-179 https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0103 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0715 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2020 4 171-179
spelling	10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 doi (DE-627)DOAJ053372786 (DE-599)DOAJ8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 Ji-young Ahn verfasserin aut Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We applied seven pairs of primer-restriction enzyme combinations to investigate the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of Prunus padus populations with AFLP markers. The values obtained for average of effective alleles (Ae), percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Shannon’s diversity index (I), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 1.38, 81.4, 0.357, and 0.223%, respectively. The expected heterozygosity (Hj) obtained by using a Bayesian method was 0.256. The level of genetic diversity obtained for P. padus was low compared to that of Prunus species and other species with a similar life history. The inbreeding coefficient (FIS) from the approximated Bayesian method was 0.767. This value was lower than that obtained for Ulmus davidiana, which undergoes both sexual and asexual reproduction. However, the value obtained was larger than that for other species that undergo sexual reproduction, such as, Carpinus laxiflora, Phellodendron amurense, and Acer pseudosieboldianum. The value of genetic differentiation was 0.245 from AMOVA (ΦST) and 0.278 from Bayesian method (θII). The obtained level of genetic differentiation was large compared to that of other Prunus species plants and other species with a similar life history. According to UPGMA and Bayesian clustering, 11 populations were divided into two genetic groups. However, some populations were detected as weak genetic structures according to the geographical distribution. It was occurred by forest succession, asexual propagation strategies to adapt local environmental change, and gene flow being gradually decreased due to population fragmentation by demographic disturbances. sexual and asexual reproduction genetic variation demographic disturbance insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals medicinal plant Forestry Jei-Wan Lee verfasserin aut Hyo-In Lim verfasserin aut Kyung-Nak Hong verfasserin aut In Forest Science and Technology Taylor & Francis Group, 2018 16(2020), 4, Seite 171-179 (DE-627)718580524 (DE-600)2658417-7 21580715 nnns volume:16 year:2020 number:4 pages:171-179 https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0103 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0715 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2020 4 171-179
allfields_unstemmed	10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 doi (DE-627)DOAJ053372786 (DE-599)DOAJ8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 Ji-young Ahn verfasserin aut Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We applied seven pairs of primer-restriction enzyme combinations to investigate the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of Prunus padus populations with AFLP markers. The values obtained for average of effective alleles (Ae), percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Shannon’s diversity index (I), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 1.38, 81.4, 0.357, and 0.223%, respectively. The expected heterozygosity (Hj) obtained by using a Bayesian method was 0.256. The level of genetic diversity obtained for P. padus was low compared to that of Prunus species and other species with a similar life history. The inbreeding coefficient (FIS) from the approximated Bayesian method was 0.767. This value was lower than that obtained for Ulmus davidiana, which undergoes both sexual and asexual reproduction. However, the value obtained was larger than that for other species that undergo sexual reproduction, such as, Carpinus laxiflora, Phellodendron amurense, and Acer pseudosieboldianum. The value of genetic differentiation was 0.245 from AMOVA (ΦST) and 0.278 from Bayesian method (θII). The obtained level of genetic differentiation was large compared to that of other Prunus species plants and other species with a similar life history. According to UPGMA and Bayesian clustering, 11 populations were divided into two genetic groups. However, some populations were detected as weak genetic structures according to the geographical distribution. It was occurred by forest succession, asexual propagation strategies to adapt local environmental change, and gene flow being gradually decreased due to population fragmentation by demographic disturbances. sexual and asexual reproduction genetic variation demographic disturbance insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals medicinal plant Forestry Jei-Wan Lee verfasserin aut Hyo-In Lim verfasserin aut Kyung-Nak Hong verfasserin aut In Forest Science and Technology Taylor & Francis Group, 2018 16(2020), 4, Seite 171-179 (DE-627)718580524 (DE-600)2658417-7 21580715 nnns volume:16 year:2020 number:4 pages:171-179 https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0103 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0715 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2020 4 171-179
allfieldsGer	10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 doi (DE-627)DOAJ053372786 (DE-599)DOAJ8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 Ji-young Ahn verfasserin aut Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We applied seven pairs of primer-restriction enzyme combinations to investigate the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of Prunus padus populations with AFLP markers. The values obtained for average of effective alleles (Ae), percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Shannon’s diversity index (I), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 1.38, 81.4, 0.357, and 0.223%, respectively. The expected heterozygosity (Hj) obtained by using a Bayesian method was 0.256. The level of genetic diversity obtained for P. padus was low compared to that of Prunus species and other species with a similar life history. The inbreeding coefficient (FIS) from the approximated Bayesian method was 0.767. This value was lower than that obtained for Ulmus davidiana, which undergoes both sexual and asexual reproduction. However, the value obtained was larger than that for other species that undergo sexual reproduction, such as, Carpinus laxiflora, Phellodendron amurense, and Acer pseudosieboldianum. The value of genetic differentiation was 0.245 from AMOVA (ΦST) and 0.278 from Bayesian method (θII). The obtained level of genetic differentiation was large compared to that of other Prunus species plants and other species with a similar life history. According to UPGMA and Bayesian clustering, 11 populations were divided into two genetic groups. However, some populations were detected as weak genetic structures according to the geographical distribution. It was occurred by forest succession, asexual propagation strategies to adapt local environmental change, and gene flow being gradually decreased due to population fragmentation by demographic disturbances. sexual and asexual reproduction genetic variation demographic disturbance insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals medicinal plant Forestry Jei-Wan Lee verfasserin aut Hyo-In Lim verfasserin aut Kyung-Nak Hong verfasserin aut In Forest Science and Technology Taylor & Francis Group, 2018 16(2020), 4, Seite 171-179 (DE-627)718580524 (DE-600)2658417-7 21580715 nnns volume:16 year:2020 number:4 pages:171-179 https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0103 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0715 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2020 4 171-179
allfieldsSound	10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 doi (DE-627)DOAJ053372786 (DE-599)DOAJ8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 Ji-young Ahn verfasserin aut Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier We applied seven pairs of primer-restriction enzyme combinations to investigate the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of Prunus padus populations with AFLP markers. The values obtained for average of effective alleles (Ae), percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Shannon’s diversity index (I), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 1.38, 81.4, 0.357, and 0.223%, respectively. The expected heterozygosity (Hj) obtained by using a Bayesian method was 0.256. The level of genetic diversity obtained for P. padus was low compared to that of Prunus species and other species with a similar life history. The inbreeding coefficient (FIS) from the approximated Bayesian method was 0.767. This value was lower than that obtained for Ulmus davidiana, which undergoes both sexual and asexual reproduction. However, the value obtained was larger than that for other species that undergo sexual reproduction, such as, Carpinus laxiflora, Phellodendron amurense, and Acer pseudosieboldianum. The value of genetic differentiation was 0.245 from AMOVA (ΦST) and 0.278 from Bayesian method (θII). The obtained level of genetic differentiation was large compared to that of other Prunus species plants and other species with a similar life history. According to UPGMA and Bayesian clustering, 11 populations were divided into two genetic groups. However, some populations were detected as weak genetic structures according to the geographical distribution. It was occurred by forest succession, asexual propagation strategies to adapt local environmental change, and gene flow being gradually decreased due to population fragmentation by demographic disturbances. sexual and asexual reproduction genetic variation demographic disturbance insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals medicinal plant Forestry Jei-Wan Lee verfasserin aut Hyo-In Lim verfasserin aut Kyung-Nak Hong verfasserin aut In Forest Science and Technology Taylor & Francis Group, 2018 16(2020), 4, Seite 171-179 (DE-627)718580524 (DE-600)2658417-7 21580715 nnns volume:16 year:2020 number:4 pages:171-179 https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1 kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0103 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0715 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 16 2020 4 171-179
language	English
source	In Forest Science and Technology 16(2020), 4, Seite 171-179 volume:16 year:2020 number:4 pages:171-179
sourceStr	In Forest Science and Technology 16(2020), 4, Seite 171-179 volume:16 year:2020 number:4 pages:171-179
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	sexual and asexual reproduction genetic variation demographic disturbance insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals medicinal plant Forestry
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Forest Science and Technology
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Ji-young Ahn @@aut@@ Jei-Wan Lee @@aut@@ Hyo-In Lim @@aut@@ Kyung-Nak Hong @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	718580524
id	DOAJ053372786
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ053372786</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308173654.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ053372786</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SD1-669.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ji-young Ahn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We applied seven pairs of primer-restriction enzyme combinations to investigate the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of Prunus padus populations with AFLP markers. The values obtained for average of effective alleles (Ae), percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Shannon’s diversity index (I), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 1.38, 81.4, 0.357, and 0.223%, respectively. The expected heterozygosity (Hj) obtained by using a Bayesian method was 0.256. The level of genetic diversity obtained for P. padus was low compared to that of Prunus species and other species with a similar life history. The inbreeding coefficient (FIS) from the approximated Bayesian method was 0.767. This value was lower than that obtained for Ulmus davidiana, which undergoes both sexual and asexual reproduction. However, the value obtained was larger than that for other species that undergo sexual reproduction, such as, Carpinus laxiflora, Phellodendron amurense, and Acer pseudosieboldianum. The value of genetic differentiation was 0.245 from AMOVA (ΦST) and 0.278 from Bayesian method (θII). The obtained level of genetic differentiation was large compared to that of other Prunus species plants and other species with a similar life history. According to UPGMA and Bayesian clustering, 11 populations were divided into two genetic groups. However, some populations were detected as weak genetic structures according to the geographical distribution. It was occurred by forest succession, asexual propagation strategies to adapt local environmental change, and gene flow being gradually decreased due to population fragmentation by demographic disturbances.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sexual and asexual reproduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">genetic variation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">demographic disturbance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">medicinal plant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forestry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jei-Wan Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyo-In Lim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kyung-Nak Hong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Forest Science and Technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Taylor & Francis Group, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2020), 4, Seite 171-179</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)718580524</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2658417-7</subfield><subfield code="x">21580715</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:171-179</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0103</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0715</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">171-179</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	S - Agriculture
author	Ji-young Ahn
spellingShingle	Ji-young Ahn misc SD1-669.5 misc sexual and asexual reproduction misc genetic variation misc demographic disturbance misc insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals misc medicinal plant misc Forestry Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers
authorStr	Ji-young Ahn
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)718580524
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	SD1-669
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	21580715
topic_title	SD1-669.5 Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers sexual and asexual reproduction genetic variation demographic disturbance insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals medicinal plant
topic	misc SD1-669.5 misc sexual and asexual reproduction misc genetic variation misc demographic disturbance misc insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals misc medicinal plant misc Forestry
topic_unstemmed	misc SD1-669.5 misc sexual and asexual reproduction misc genetic variation misc demographic disturbance misc insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals misc medicinal plant misc Forestry
topic_browse	misc SD1-669.5 misc sexual and asexual reproduction misc genetic variation misc demographic disturbance misc insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals misc medicinal plant misc Forestry
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Forest Science and Technology
hierarchy_parent_id	718580524
hierarchy_top_title	Forest Science and Technology
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)718580524 (DE-600)2658417-7
title	Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ053372786 (DE-599)DOAJ8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1
title_full	Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers
author_sort	Ji-young Ahn
journal	Forest Science and Technology
journalStr	Forest Science and Technology
callnumber-first-code	S
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	171
author_browse	Ji-young Ahn Jei-Wan Lee Hyo-In Lim Kyung-Nak Hong
container_volume	16
class	SD1-669.5
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Ji-young Ahn
doi_str_mv	10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	genetic diversity and structure of prunus padus populations in south korea based on aflp markers
callnumber	SD1-669.5
title_auth	Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers
abstract	We applied seven pairs of primer-restriction enzyme combinations to investigate the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of Prunus padus populations with AFLP markers. The values obtained for average of effective alleles (Ae), percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Shannon’s diversity index (I), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 1.38, 81.4, 0.357, and 0.223%, respectively. The expected heterozygosity (Hj) obtained by using a Bayesian method was 0.256. The level of genetic diversity obtained for P. padus was low compared to that of Prunus species and other species with a similar life history. The inbreeding coefficient (FIS) from the approximated Bayesian method was 0.767. This value was lower than that obtained for Ulmus davidiana, which undergoes both sexual and asexual reproduction. However, the value obtained was larger than that for other species that undergo sexual reproduction, such as, Carpinus laxiflora, Phellodendron amurense, and Acer pseudosieboldianum. The value of genetic differentiation was 0.245 from AMOVA (ΦST) and 0.278 from Bayesian method (θII). The obtained level of genetic differentiation was large compared to that of other Prunus species plants and other species with a similar life history. According to UPGMA and Bayesian clustering, 11 populations were divided into two genetic groups. However, some populations were detected as weak genetic structures according to the geographical distribution. It was occurred by forest succession, asexual propagation strategies to adapt local environmental change, and gene flow being gradually decreased due to population fragmentation by demographic disturbances.
abstractGer	We applied seven pairs of primer-restriction enzyme combinations to investigate the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of Prunus padus populations with AFLP markers. The values obtained for average of effective alleles (Ae), percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Shannon’s diversity index (I), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 1.38, 81.4, 0.357, and 0.223%, respectively. The expected heterozygosity (Hj) obtained by using a Bayesian method was 0.256. The level of genetic diversity obtained for P. padus was low compared to that of Prunus species and other species with a similar life history. The inbreeding coefficient (FIS) from the approximated Bayesian method was 0.767. This value was lower than that obtained for Ulmus davidiana, which undergoes both sexual and asexual reproduction. However, the value obtained was larger than that for other species that undergo sexual reproduction, such as, Carpinus laxiflora, Phellodendron amurense, and Acer pseudosieboldianum. The value of genetic differentiation was 0.245 from AMOVA (ΦST) and 0.278 from Bayesian method (θII). The obtained level of genetic differentiation was large compared to that of other Prunus species plants and other species with a similar life history. According to UPGMA and Bayesian clustering, 11 populations were divided into two genetic groups. However, some populations were detected as weak genetic structures according to the geographical distribution. It was occurred by forest succession, asexual propagation strategies to adapt local environmental change, and gene flow being gradually decreased due to population fragmentation by demographic disturbances.
abstract_unstemmed	We applied seven pairs of primer-restriction enzyme combinations to investigate the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of Prunus padus populations with AFLP markers. The values obtained for average of effective alleles (Ae), percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Shannon’s diversity index (I), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 1.38, 81.4, 0.357, and 0.223%, respectively. The expected heterozygosity (Hj) obtained by using a Bayesian method was 0.256. The level of genetic diversity obtained for P. padus was low compared to that of Prunus species and other species with a similar life history. The inbreeding coefficient (FIS) from the approximated Bayesian method was 0.767. This value was lower than that obtained for Ulmus davidiana, which undergoes both sexual and asexual reproduction. However, the value obtained was larger than that for other species that undergo sexual reproduction, such as, Carpinus laxiflora, Phellodendron amurense, and Acer pseudosieboldianum. The value of genetic differentiation was 0.245 from AMOVA (ΦST) and 0.278 from Bayesian method (θII). The obtained level of genetic differentiation was large compared to that of other Prunus species plants and other species with a similar life history. According to UPGMA and Bayesian clustering, 11 populations were divided into two genetic groups. However, some populations were detected as weak genetic structures according to the geographical distribution. It was occurred by forest succession, asexual propagation strategies to adapt local environmental change, and gene flow being gradually decreased due to population fragmentation by demographic disturbances.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	4
title_short	Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers
url	https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 https://doaj.org/article/8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415 https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0103 https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0715
remote_bool	true
author2	Jei-Wan Lee Hyo-In Lim Kyung-Nak Hong
author2Str	Jei-Wan Lee Hyo-In Lim Kyung-Nak Hong
ppnlink	718580524
callnumber-subject	SD - Forestry
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415
callnumber-a	SD1-669.5
up_date	2024-07-03T17:18:31.871Z
_version_	1803579148858294272
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ053372786</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308173654.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ053372786</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SD1-669.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ji-young Ahn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">We applied seven pairs of primer-restriction enzyme combinations to investigate the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and genetic structure of Prunus padus populations with AFLP markers. The values obtained for average of effective alleles (Ae), percentage of polymorphic loci (%P), Shannon’s diversity index (I), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 1.38, 81.4, 0.357, and 0.223%, respectively. The expected heterozygosity (Hj) obtained by using a Bayesian method was 0.256. The level of genetic diversity obtained for P. padus was low compared to that of Prunus species and other species with a similar life history. The inbreeding coefficient (FIS) from the approximated Bayesian method was 0.767. This value was lower than that obtained for Ulmus davidiana, which undergoes both sexual and asexual reproduction. However, the value obtained was larger than that for other species that undergo sexual reproduction, such as, Carpinus laxiflora, Phellodendron amurense, and Acer pseudosieboldianum. The value of genetic differentiation was 0.245 from AMOVA (ΦST) and 0.278 from Bayesian method (θII). The obtained level of genetic differentiation was large compared to that of other Prunus species plants and other species with a similar life history. According to UPGMA and Bayesian clustering, 11 populations were divided into two genetic groups. However, some populations were detected as weak genetic structures according to the geographical distribution. It was occurred by forest succession, asexual propagation strategies to adapt local environmental change, and gene flow being gradually decreased due to population fragmentation by demographic disturbances.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">sexual and asexual reproduction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">genetic variation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">demographic disturbance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">insect pollinated and seed dispersal by animals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">medicinal plant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forestry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jei-Wan Lee</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hyo-In Lim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kyung-Nak Hong</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Forest Science and Technology</subfield><subfield code="d">Taylor & Francis Group, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2020), 4, Seite 171-179</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)718580524</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2658417-7</subfield><subfield code="x">21580715</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:171-179</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8fd792b9c6764da2a0d31015b888b5b1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1807415</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0103</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2158-0715</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">171-179</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401348

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Genetic diversity and structure of Prunus padus populations in South Korea based on AFLP markers

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?