MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY
The article shows a significant similarity of the claims of philosophy and theology to the status of meta-science and universal philosophical discourse. Historically, these claims relate to the doctrine of a special intuitive cognition, but today they are manifested in an attempt to answer the main...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Tatiana Levchenko [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Ukrainisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Освітній дискурс - "Scientific Information Agency "Science-technologies-information" LLC, 2019, 25(2020), 7-8, Seite 80-90 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:25 ; year:2020 ; number:7-8 ; pages:80-90 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ05369161X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ05369161X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230308175114.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||ukr c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ05369161X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJdf7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a ukr | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Tatiana Levchenko |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The article shows a significant similarity of the claims of philosophy and theology to the status of meta-science and universal philosophical discourse. Historically, these claims relate to the doctrine of a special intuitive cognition, but today they are manifested in an attempt to answer the main ideological questions of the individual. It is proved that the claims of theology to the status of metascience are less substantiated than in philosophy, since theology cannot provide methodology for specific sciences, cannot, without the mediation of philosophy, evaluate scientific theories. Also, the theologian is not free in his own reflections, even if he exhibits creative spontaneity, because it must necessarily be rooted in a certain tradition. Utopian are the hopes of Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant theologians that theology with the end of the modern era can again qualify for the status of meta-science and evaluate the achievements of all sciences, especially humanitarian ones. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a spiritual education | |
| 650 | 4 | |a theology as a science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a theology as a worldview discipline | |
| 650 | 4 | |a theology and philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a theology and scientific worldview | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Education | |
| 653 | 0 | |a L | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Освітній дискурс |d "Scientific Information Agency "Science-technologies-information" LLC, 2019 |g 25(2020), 7-8, Seite 80-90 |w (DE-627)1760590487 |x 26165007 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2020 |g number:7-8 |g pages:80-90 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/df7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.journal-discourse.com/uk/kataloh-statei/2020-r-257-8/suchasni-problemy-dukhovnoi-osvity-v-ukrainy-pytannia-pro-status-teolohii.html |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2522-9699 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2616-5007 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 25 |j 2020 |e 7-8 |h 80-90 | ||
| author_variant |
t l tl |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:26165007:2020----::oenrbesfprtaeuainnkanteusin |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 doi (DE-627)DOAJ05369161X (DE-599)DOAJdf7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ukr Tatiana Levchenko verfasserin aut MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article shows a significant similarity of the claims of philosophy and theology to the status of meta-science and universal philosophical discourse. Historically, these claims relate to the doctrine of a special intuitive cognition, but today they are manifested in an attempt to answer the main ideological questions of the individual. It is proved that the claims of theology to the status of metascience are less substantiated than in philosophy, since theology cannot provide methodology for specific sciences, cannot, without the mediation of philosophy, evaluate scientific theories. Also, the theologian is not free in his own reflections, even if he exhibits creative spontaneity, because it must necessarily be rooted in a certain tradition. Utopian are the hopes of Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant theologians that theology with the end of the modern era can again qualify for the status of meta-science and evaluate the achievements of all sciences, especially humanitarian ones. spiritual education theology as a science theology as a worldview discipline theology and philosophy theology and scientific worldview Education L In Освітній дискурс "Scientific Information Agency "Science-technologies-information" LLC, 2019 25(2020), 7-8, Seite 80-90 (DE-627)1760590487 26165007 nnns volume:25 year:2020 number:7-8 pages:80-90 https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/df7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f kostenfrei http://www.journal-discourse.com/uk/kataloh-statei/2020-r-257-8/suchasni-problemy-dukhovnoi-osvity-v-ukrainy-pytannia-pro-status-teolohii.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2522-9699 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2616-5007 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2020 7-8 80-90 |
| spelling |
10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 doi (DE-627)DOAJ05369161X (DE-599)DOAJdf7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ukr Tatiana Levchenko verfasserin aut MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article shows a significant similarity of the claims of philosophy and theology to the status of meta-science and universal philosophical discourse. Historically, these claims relate to the doctrine of a special intuitive cognition, but today they are manifested in an attempt to answer the main ideological questions of the individual. It is proved that the claims of theology to the status of metascience are less substantiated than in philosophy, since theology cannot provide methodology for specific sciences, cannot, without the mediation of philosophy, evaluate scientific theories. Also, the theologian is not free in his own reflections, even if he exhibits creative spontaneity, because it must necessarily be rooted in a certain tradition. Utopian are the hopes of Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant theologians that theology with the end of the modern era can again qualify for the status of meta-science and evaluate the achievements of all sciences, especially humanitarian ones. spiritual education theology as a science theology as a worldview discipline theology and philosophy theology and scientific worldview Education L In Освітній дискурс "Scientific Information Agency "Science-technologies-information" LLC, 2019 25(2020), 7-8, Seite 80-90 (DE-627)1760590487 26165007 nnns volume:25 year:2020 number:7-8 pages:80-90 https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/df7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f kostenfrei http://www.journal-discourse.com/uk/kataloh-statei/2020-r-257-8/suchasni-problemy-dukhovnoi-osvity-v-ukrainy-pytannia-pro-status-teolohii.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2522-9699 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2616-5007 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2020 7-8 80-90 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 doi (DE-627)DOAJ05369161X (DE-599)DOAJdf7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ukr Tatiana Levchenko verfasserin aut MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article shows a significant similarity of the claims of philosophy and theology to the status of meta-science and universal philosophical discourse. Historically, these claims relate to the doctrine of a special intuitive cognition, but today they are manifested in an attempt to answer the main ideological questions of the individual. It is proved that the claims of theology to the status of metascience are less substantiated than in philosophy, since theology cannot provide methodology for specific sciences, cannot, without the mediation of philosophy, evaluate scientific theories. Also, the theologian is not free in his own reflections, even if he exhibits creative spontaneity, because it must necessarily be rooted in a certain tradition. Utopian are the hopes of Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant theologians that theology with the end of the modern era can again qualify for the status of meta-science and evaluate the achievements of all sciences, especially humanitarian ones. spiritual education theology as a science theology as a worldview discipline theology and philosophy theology and scientific worldview Education L In Освітній дискурс "Scientific Information Agency "Science-technologies-information" LLC, 2019 25(2020), 7-8, Seite 80-90 (DE-627)1760590487 26165007 nnns volume:25 year:2020 number:7-8 pages:80-90 https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/df7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f kostenfrei http://www.journal-discourse.com/uk/kataloh-statei/2020-r-257-8/suchasni-problemy-dukhovnoi-osvity-v-ukrainy-pytannia-pro-status-teolohii.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2522-9699 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2616-5007 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2020 7-8 80-90 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 doi (DE-627)DOAJ05369161X (DE-599)DOAJdf7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ukr Tatiana Levchenko verfasserin aut MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article shows a significant similarity of the claims of philosophy and theology to the status of meta-science and universal philosophical discourse. Historically, these claims relate to the doctrine of a special intuitive cognition, but today they are manifested in an attempt to answer the main ideological questions of the individual. It is proved that the claims of theology to the status of metascience are less substantiated than in philosophy, since theology cannot provide methodology for specific sciences, cannot, without the mediation of philosophy, evaluate scientific theories. Also, the theologian is not free in his own reflections, even if he exhibits creative spontaneity, because it must necessarily be rooted in a certain tradition. Utopian are the hopes of Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant theologians that theology with the end of the modern era can again qualify for the status of meta-science and evaluate the achievements of all sciences, especially humanitarian ones. spiritual education theology as a science theology as a worldview discipline theology and philosophy theology and scientific worldview Education L In Освітній дискурс "Scientific Information Agency "Science-technologies-information" LLC, 2019 25(2020), 7-8, Seite 80-90 (DE-627)1760590487 26165007 nnns volume:25 year:2020 number:7-8 pages:80-90 https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/df7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f kostenfrei http://www.journal-discourse.com/uk/kataloh-statei/2020-r-257-8/suchasni-problemy-dukhovnoi-osvity-v-ukrainy-pytannia-pro-status-teolohii.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2522-9699 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2616-5007 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2020 7-8 80-90 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 doi (DE-627)DOAJ05369161X (DE-599)DOAJdf7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ukr Tatiana Levchenko verfasserin aut MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article shows a significant similarity of the claims of philosophy and theology to the status of meta-science and universal philosophical discourse. Historically, these claims relate to the doctrine of a special intuitive cognition, but today they are manifested in an attempt to answer the main ideological questions of the individual. It is proved that the claims of theology to the status of metascience are less substantiated than in philosophy, since theology cannot provide methodology for specific sciences, cannot, without the mediation of philosophy, evaluate scientific theories. Also, the theologian is not free in his own reflections, even if he exhibits creative spontaneity, because it must necessarily be rooted in a certain tradition. Utopian are the hopes of Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant theologians that theology with the end of the modern era can again qualify for the status of meta-science and evaluate the achievements of all sciences, especially humanitarian ones. spiritual education theology as a science theology as a worldview discipline theology and philosophy theology and scientific worldview Education L In Освітній дискурс "Scientific Information Agency "Science-technologies-information" LLC, 2019 25(2020), 7-8, Seite 80-90 (DE-627)1760590487 26165007 nnns volume:25 year:2020 number:7-8 pages:80-90 https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/df7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f kostenfrei http://www.journal-discourse.com/uk/kataloh-statei/2020-r-257-8/suchasni-problemy-dukhovnoi-osvity-v-ukrainy-pytannia-pro-status-teolohii.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2522-9699 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2616-5007 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 25 2020 7-8 80-90 |
| language |
Ukrainian |
| source |
In Освітній дискурс 25(2020), 7-8, Seite 80-90 volume:25 year:2020 number:7-8 pages:80-90 |
| sourceStr |
In Освітній дискурс 25(2020), 7-8, Seite 80-90 volume:25 year:2020 number:7-8 pages:80-90 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
spiritual education theology as a science theology as a worldview discipline theology and philosophy theology and scientific worldview Education L |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Освітній дискурс |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Tatiana Levchenko @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760590487 |
| id |
DOAJ05369161X |
| language_de |
ukrainisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ05369161X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308175114.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||ukr c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ05369161X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdf7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tatiana Levchenko</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article shows a significant similarity of the claims of philosophy and theology to the status of meta-science and universal philosophical discourse. Historically, these claims relate to the doctrine of a special intuitive cognition, but today they are manifested in an attempt to answer the main ideological questions of the individual. It is proved that the claims of theology to the status of metascience are less substantiated than in philosophy, since theology cannot provide methodology for specific sciences, cannot, without the mediation of philosophy, evaluate scientific theories. Also, the theologian is not free in his own reflections, even if he exhibits creative spontaneity, because it must necessarily be rooted in a certain tradition. Utopian are the hopes of Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant theologians that theology with the end of the modern era can again qualify for the status of meta-science and evaluate the achievements of all sciences, especially humanitarian ones.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">spiritual education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theology as a science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theology as a worldview discipline</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theology and philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theology and scientific worldview</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Освітній дискурс</subfield><subfield code="d">"Scientific Information Agency "Science-technologies-information" LLC, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2020), 7-8, Seite 80-90</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760590487</subfield><subfield code="x">26165007</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7-8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:80-90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/df7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.journal-discourse.com/uk/kataloh-statei/2020-r-257-8/suchasni-problemy-dukhovnoi-osvity-v-ukrainy-pytannia-pro-status-teolohii.html</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2522-9699</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2616-5007</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">7-8</subfield><subfield code="h">80-90</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Tatiana Levchenko |
| spellingShingle |
Tatiana Levchenko misc spiritual education misc theology as a science misc theology as a worldview discipline misc theology and philosophy misc theology and scientific worldview misc Education misc L MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY |
| authorStr |
Tatiana Levchenko |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760590487 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
26165007 |
| topic_title |
MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY spiritual education theology as a science theology as a worldview discipline theology and philosophy theology and scientific worldview |
| topic |
misc spiritual education misc theology as a science misc theology as a worldview discipline misc theology and philosophy misc theology and scientific worldview misc Education misc L |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc spiritual education misc theology as a science misc theology as a worldview discipline misc theology and philosophy misc theology and scientific worldview misc Education misc L |
| topic_browse |
misc spiritual education misc theology as a science misc theology as a worldview discipline misc theology and philosophy misc theology and scientific worldview misc Education misc L |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Освітній дискурс |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760590487 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Освітній дискурс |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760590487 |
| title |
MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ05369161X (DE-599)DOAJdf7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f |
| title_full |
MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY |
| author_sort |
Tatiana Levchenko |
| journal |
Освітній дискурс |
| journalStr |
Освітній дискурс |
| lang_code |
ukr |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
80 |
| author_browse |
Tatiana Levchenko |
| container_volume |
25 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Tatiana Levchenko |
| doi_str_mv |
10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 |
| title_sort |
modern problems of spiritual education in ukraine: the question of the status of theology |
| title_auth |
MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY |
| abstract |
The article shows a significant similarity of the claims of philosophy and theology to the status of meta-science and universal philosophical discourse. Historically, these claims relate to the doctrine of a special intuitive cognition, but today they are manifested in an attempt to answer the main ideological questions of the individual. It is proved that the claims of theology to the status of metascience are less substantiated than in philosophy, since theology cannot provide methodology for specific sciences, cannot, without the mediation of philosophy, evaluate scientific theories. Also, the theologian is not free in his own reflections, even if he exhibits creative spontaneity, because it must necessarily be rooted in a certain tradition. Utopian are the hopes of Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant theologians that theology with the end of the modern era can again qualify for the status of meta-science and evaluate the achievements of all sciences, especially humanitarian ones. |
| abstractGer |
The article shows a significant similarity of the claims of philosophy and theology to the status of meta-science and universal philosophical discourse. Historically, these claims relate to the doctrine of a special intuitive cognition, but today they are manifested in an attempt to answer the main ideological questions of the individual. It is proved that the claims of theology to the status of metascience are less substantiated than in philosophy, since theology cannot provide methodology for specific sciences, cannot, without the mediation of philosophy, evaluate scientific theories. Also, the theologian is not free in his own reflections, even if he exhibits creative spontaneity, because it must necessarily be rooted in a certain tradition. Utopian are the hopes of Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant theologians that theology with the end of the modern era can again qualify for the status of meta-science and evaluate the achievements of all sciences, especially humanitarian ones. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The article shows a significant similarity of the claims of philosophy and theology to the status of meta-science and universal philosophical discourse. Historically, these claims relate to the doctrine of a special intuitive cognition, but today they are manifested in an attempt to answer the main ideological questions of the individual. It is proved that the claims of theology to the status of metascience are less substantiated than in philosophy, since theology cannot provide methodology for specific sciences, cannot, without the mediation of philosophy, evaluate scientific theories. Also, the theologian is not free in his own reflections, even if he exhibits creative spontaneity, because it must necessarily be rooted in a certain tradition. Utopian are the hopes of Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant theologians that theology with the end of the modern era can again qualify for the status of meta-science and evaluate the achievements of all sciences, especially humanitarian ones. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
7-8 |
| title_short |
MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 https://doaj.org/article/df7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f http://www.journal-discourse.com/uk/kataloh-statei/2020-r-257-8/suchasni-problemy-dukhovnoi-osvity-v-ukrainy-pytannia-pro-status-teolohii.html https://doaj.org/toc/2522-9699 https://doaj.org/toc/2616-5007 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760590487 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:02:52.263Z |
| _version_ |
1803585713362436096 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ05369161X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308175114.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||ukr c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ05369161X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdf7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tatiana Levchenko</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">MODERN PROBLEMS OF SPIRITUAL EDUCATION IN UKRAINE: THE QUESTION OF THE STATUS OF THEOLOGY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article shows a significant similarity of the claims of philosophy and theology to the status of meta-science and universal philosophical discourse. Historically, these claims relate to the doctrine of a special intuitive cognition, but today they are manifested in an attempt to answer the main ideological questions of the individual. It is proved that the claims of theology to the status of metascience are less substantiated than in philosophy, since theology cannot provide methodology for specific sciences, cannot, without the mediation of philosophy, evaluate scientific theories. Also, the theologian is not free in his own reflections, even if he exhibits creative spontaneity, because it must necessarily be rooted in a certain tradition. Utopian are the hopes of Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant theologians that theology with the end of the modern era can again qualify for the status of meta-science and evaluate the achievements of all sciences, especially humanitarian ones.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">spiritual education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theology as a science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theology as a worldview discipline</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theology and philosophy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">theology and scientific worldview</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Освітній дискурс</subfield><subfield code="d">"Scientific Information Agency "Science-technologies-information" LLC, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2020), 7-8, Seite 80-90</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760590487</subfield><subfield code="x">26165007</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:7-8</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:80-90</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.33930/ed.2019.5007.25(7-8)-7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/df7a9a37a41e46fb96f7ba254ad5a95f</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.journal-discourse.com/uk/kataloh-statei/2020-r-257-8/suchasni-problemy-dukhovnoi-osvity-v-ukrainy-pytannia-pro-status-teolohii.html</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2522-9699</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2616-5007</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">7-8</subfield><subfield code="h">80-90</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.398587 |