Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle

Os bispos cristãos Eunômio de Cízico (335-394 d.C.) e Basílio de Cesaréia (329/331-379 d.C.) representavam os ideais político-religiosos de dois grupos: cristãos arianos e cristãos nicenos, respectivamente. As contendas que permearam essa temática buscaram a legitimidade de uma ortodoxia religiosa baseado em suas interpretações sobre a natureza do Verbo, a segunda pessoa da Trindade. Dentre os inúmeros grupos religiosos que discutiram o tema objetivamos, neste artigo, compreender as circunstâncias do desenvolvimento da controvérsia ariana a partir do conflito entre o ariano Eunômio de Cízico e o niceno Basílio de Cesaréia. Nossa proposta vai além dos aspectos puramente religiosos e teológicos, pois depositamos na análise retórica uma metodologia para encontrar elementos do ideal e da propaganda político-religiosos desses dois bispos cristãos. Para atingir tal fim, pretendemos analisar e comparar seus testemunhos Apologia e Contra Eunômio, respectivamente, empregando o manual de Aristóteles Arte Retórica.<br<The Christian bishops Eunomius of Cyzic (335-394 AD) and Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD) represented the politico-religious ideals of two christian groups: Arian Christians and Christians Nicene, respectively. The contentions that permeated this theme sought the legitimacy of the Orthodox religion based on its interpretations of the nature of Logos, the second person of the Trinity. Within the enumerable religious groups that have discussed the theme, we have aimed in this article to understand the circumstances of the development of the Aryan controversy starting from the conflict between the Aryan, Eunomius of Cizic, and the Nicene, Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD). Our purpose has gone beyond the purely religious and theological aspects, as we have set down in the rhetorical analysis, a methodology to find elements of the ideal and the politico-religious propaganda of these two Christian bishops. To achieve this end, we intend to analyze and compare their testimonies Apology e Against Eunomius, respectively, using the manual Aristotle's Rhetorical Art. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Helena Amália Papa [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Spanisch ; Portugiesisch

Erschienen:	2010

Schlagwörter:	Antiguidade Tardia Conflito político-religioso Arianismo Eunômio de Cízico Basílio de Cesaréia Late Antiquity Politico-religious Conflict Arianism Eunomius of Cizic Basil of Caesarea

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: História - Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, 2007, 29(2010), 1, Seite 211-232
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:29 ; year:2010 ; number:1 ; pages:211-232

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ054079373

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ054079373
003	DE-627
005	20230308181010.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2010 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ054079373
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJd97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a spa \|a por
050		0	\|a D1-2009
100	0		\|a Helena Amália Papa \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle
264		1	\|c 2010
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Os bispos cristãos Eunômio de Cízico (335-394 d.C.) e Basílio de Cesaréia (329/331-379 d.C.) representavam os ideais político-religiosos de dois grupos: cristãos arianos e cristãos nicenos, respectivamente. As contendas que permearam essa temática buscaram a legitimidade de uma ortodoxia religiosa baseado em suas interpretações sobre a natureza do Verbo, a segunda pessoa da Trindade. Dentre os inúmeros grupos religiosos que discutiram o tema objetivamos, neste artigo, compreender as circunstâncias do desenvolvimento da controvérsia ariana a partir do conflito entre o ariano Eunômio de Cízico e o niceno Basílio de Cesaréia. Nossa proposta vai além dos aspectos puramente religiosos e teológicos, pois depositamos na análise retórica uma metodologia para encontrar elementos do ideal e da propaganda político-religiosos desses dois bispos cristãos. Para atingir tal fim, pretendemos analisar e comparar seus testemunhos Apologia e Contra Eunômio, respectivamente, empregando o manual de Aristóteles Arte Retórica.<br<The Christian bishops Eunomius of Cyzic (335-394 AD) and Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD) represented the politico-religious ideals of two christian groups: Arian Christians and Christians Nicene, respectively. The contentions that permeated this theme sought the legitimacy of the Orthodox religion based on its interpretations of the nature of Logos, the second person of the Trinity. Within the enumerable religious groups that have discussed the theme, we have aimed in this article to understand the circumstances of the development of the Aryan controversy starting from the conflict between the Aryan, Eunomius of Cizic, and the Nicene, Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD). Our purpose has gone beyond the purely religious and theological aspects, as we have set down in the rhetorical analysis, a methodology to find elements of the ideal and the politico-religious propaganda of these two Christian bishops. To achieve this end, we intend to analyze and compare their testimonies Apology e Against Eunomius, respectively, using the manual Aristotle's Rhetorical Art.
650		4	\|a Antiguidade Tardia
650		4	\|a Conflito político-religioso
650		4	\|a Arianismo
650		4	\|a Eunômio de Cízico
650		4	\|a Basílio de Cesaréia
650		4	\|a Late Antiquity
650		4	\|a Politico-religious Conflict
650		4	\|a Arianism
650		4	\|a Eunomius of Cizic
650		4	\|a Basil of Caesarea
653		0	\|a History (General)
773	0	8	\|i In \|t História \|d Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, 2007 \|g 29(2010), 1, Seite 211-232 \|w (DE-627)565518917 \|w (DE-600)2424437-5 \|x 19804369 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:29 \|g year:2010 \|g number:1 \|g pages:211-232
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/d97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-90742010000100013 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/0101-9074 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1980-4369 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4392
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 29 \|j 2010 \|e 1 \|h 211-232

Indexfelder

author_variant	h a p hap
matchkey_str	article:19804369:2010----::ofiootcrlgooebtdsusveteumoezcealoeeaiuiiadmnadaiteepltcrlgosofitndsusvcaheweenmuo
hierarchy_sort_str	2010
callnumber-subject-code	D
publishDate	2010
allfields	10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 doi (DE-627)DOAJ054079373 (DE-599)DOAJd97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por D1-2009 Helena Amália Papa verfasserin aut Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Os bispos cristãos Eunômio de Cízico (335-394 d.C.) e Basílio de Cesaréia (329/331-379 d.C.) representavam os ideais político-religiosos de dois grupos: cristãos arianos e cristãos nicenos, respectivamente. As contendas que permearam essa temática buscaram a legitimidade de uma ortodoxia religiosa baseado em suas interpretações sobre a natureza do Verbo, a segunda pessoa da Trindade. Dentre os inúmeros grupos religiosos que discutiram o tema objetivamos, neste artigo, compreender as circunstâncias do desenvolvimento da controvérsia ariana a partir do conflito entre o ariano Eunômio de Cízico e o niceno Basílio de Cesaréia. Nossa proposta vai além dos aspectos puramente religiosos e teológicos, pois depositamos na análise retórica uma metodologia para encontrar elementos do ideal e da propaganda político-religiosos desses dois bispos cristãos. Para atingir tal fim, pretendemos analisar e comparar seus testemunhos Apologia e Contra Eunômio, respectivamente, empregando o manual de Aristóteles Arte Retórica.<br<The Christian bishops Eunomius of Cyzic (335-394 AD) and Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD) represented the politico-religious ideals of two christian groups: Arian Christians and Christians Nicene, respectively. The contentions that permeated this theme sought the legitimacy of the Orthodox religion based on its interpretations of the nature of Logos, the second person of the Trinity. Within the enumerable religious groups that have discussed the theme, we have aimed in this article to understand the circumstances of the development of the Aryan controversy starting from the conflict between the Aryan, Eunomius of Cizic, and the Nicene, Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD). Our purpose has gone beyond the purely religious and theological aspects, as we have set down in the rhetorical analysis, a methodology to find elements of the ideal and the politico-religious propaganda of these two Christian bishops. To achieve this end, we intend to analyze and compare their testimonies Apology e Against Eunomius, respectively, using the manual Aristotle's Rhetorical Art. Antiguidade Tardia Conflito político-religioso Arianismo Eunômio de Cízico Basílio de Cesaréia Late Antiquity Politico-religious Conflict Arianism Eunomius of Cizic Basil of Caesarea History (General) In História Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, 2007 29(2010), 1, Seite 211-232 (DE-627)565518917 (DE-600)2424437-5 19804369 nnns volume:29 year:2010 number:1 pages:211-232 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-90742010000100013 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0101-9074 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1980-4369 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 29 2010 1 211-232
spelling	10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 doi (DE-627)DOAJ054079373 (DE-599)DOAJd97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por D1-2009 Helena Amália Papa verfasserin aut Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Os bispos cristãos Eunômio de Cízico (335-394 d.C.) e Basílio de Cesaréia (329/331-379 d.C.) representavam os ideais político-religiosos de dois grupos: cristãos arianos e cristãos nicenos, respectivamente. As contendas que permearam essa temática buscaram a legitimidade de uma ortodoxia religiosa baseado em suas interpretações sobre a natureza do Verbo, a segunda pessoa da Trindade. Dentre os inúmeros grupos religiosos que discutiram o tema objetivamos, neste artigo, compreender as circunstâncias do desenvolvimento da controvérsia ariana a partir do conflito entre o ariano Eunômio de Cízico e o niceno Basílio de Cesaréia. Nossa proposta vai além dos aspectos puramente religiosos e teológicos, pois depositamos na análise retórica uma metodologia para encontrar elementos do ideal e da propaganda político-religiosos desses dois bispos cristãos. Para atingir tal fim, pretendemos analisar e comparar seus testemunhos Apologia e Contra Eunômio, respectivamente, empregando o manual de Aristóteles Arte Retórica.<br<The Christian bishops Eunomius of Cyzic (335-394 AD) and Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD) represented the politico-religious ideals of two christian groups: Arian Christians and Christians Nicene, respectively. The contentions that permeated this theme sought the legitimacy of the Orthodox religion based on its interpretations of the nature of Logos, the second person of the Trinity. Within the enumerable religious groups that have discussed the theme, we have aimed in this article to understand the circumstances of the development of the Aryan controversy starting from the conflict between the Aryan, Eunomius of Cizic, and the Nicene, Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD). Our purpose has gone beyond the purely religious and theological aspects, as we have set down in the rhetorical analysis, a methodology to find elements of the ideal and the politico-religious propaganda of these two Christian bishops. To achieve this end, we intend to analyze and compare their testimonies Apology e Against Eunomius, respectively, using the manual Aristotle's Rhetorical Art. Antiguidade Tardia Conflito político-religioso Arianismo Eunômio de Cízico Basílio de Cesaréia Late Antiquity Politico-religious Conflict Arianism Eunomius of Cizic Basil of Caesarea History (General) In História Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, 2007 29(2010), 1, Seite 211-232 (DE-627)565518917 (DE-600)2424437-5 19804369 nnns volume:29 year:2010 number:1 pages:211-232 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-90742010000100013 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0101-9074 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1980-4369 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 29 2010 1 211-232
allfields_unstemmed	10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 doi (DE-627)DOAJ054079373 (DE-599)DOAJd97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por D1-2009 Helena Amália Papa verfasserin aut Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Os bispos cristãos Eunômio de Cízico (335-394 d.C.) e Basílio de Cesaréia (329/331-379 d.C.) representavam os ideais político-religiosos de dois grupos: cristãos arianos e cristãos nicenos, respectivamente. As contendas que permearam essa temática buscaram a legitimidade de uma ortodoxia religiosa baseado em suas interpretações sobre a natureza do Verbo, a segunda pessoa da Trindade. Dentre os inúmeros grupos religiosos que discutiram o tema objetivamos, neste artigo, compreender as circunstâncias do desenvolvimento da controvérsia ariana a partir do conflito entre o ariano Eunômio de Cízico e o niceno Basílio de Cesaréia. Nossa proposta vai além dos aspectos puramente religiosos e teológicos, pois depositamos na análise retórica uma metodologia para encontrar elementos do ideal e da propaganda político-religiosos desses dois bispos cristãos. Para atingir tal fim, pretendemos analisar e comparar seus testemunhos Apologia e Contra Eunômio, respectivamente, empregando o manual de Aristóteles Arte Retórica.<br<The Christian bishops Eunomius of Cyzic (335-394 AD) and Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD) represented the politico-religious ideals of two christian groups: Arian Christians and Christians Nicene, respectively. The contentions that permeated this theme sought the legitimacy of the Orthodox religion based on its interpretations of the nature of Logos, the second person of the Trinity. Within the enumerable religious groups that have discussed the theme, we have aimed in this article to understand the circumstances of the development of the Aryan controversy starting from the conflict between the Aryan, Eunomius of Cizic, and the Nicene, Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD). Our purpose has gone beyond the purely religious and theological aspects, as we have set down in the rhetorical analysis, a methodology to find elements of the ideal and the politico-religious propaganda of these two Christian bishops. To achieve this end, we intend to analyze and compare their testimonies Apology e Against Eunomius, respectively, using the manual Aristotle's Rhetorical Art. Antiguidade Tardia Conflito político-religioso Arianismo Eunômio de Cízico Basílio de Cesaréia Late Antiquity Politico-religious Conflict Arianism Eunomius of Cizic Basil of Caesarea History (General) In História Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, 2007 29(2010), 1, Seite 211-232 (DE-627)565518917 (DE-600)2424437-5 19804369 nnns volume:29 year:2010 number:1 pages:211-232 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-90742010000100013 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0101-9074 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1980-4369 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 29 2010 1 211-232
allfieldsGer	10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 doi (DE-627)DOAJ054079373 (DE-599)DOAJd97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por D1-2009 Helena Amália Papa verfasserin aut Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Os bispos cristãos Eunômio de Cízico (335-394 d.C.) e Basílio de Cesaréia (329/331-379 d.C.) representavam os ideais político-religiosos de dois grupos: cristãos arianos e cristãos nicenos, respectivamente. As contendas que permearam essa temática buscaram a legitimidade de uma ortodoxia religiosa baseado em suas interpretações sobre a natureza do Verbo, a segunda pessoa da Trindade. Dentre os inúmeros grupos religiosos que discutiram o tema objetivamos, neste artigo, compreender as circunstâncias do desenvolvimento da controvérsia ariana a partir do conflito entre o ariano Eunômio de Cízico e o niceno Basílio de Cesaréia. Nossa proposta vai além dos aspectos puramente religiosos e teológicos, pois depositamos na análise retórica uma metodologia para encontrar elementos do ideal e da propaganda político-religiosos desses dois bispos cristãos. Para atingir tal fim, pretendemos analisar e comparar seus testemunhos Apologia e Contra Eunômio, respectivamente, empregando o manual de Aristóteles Arte Retórica.<br<The Christian bishops Eunomius of Cyzic (335-394 AD) and Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD) represented the politico-religious ideals of two christian groups: Arian Christians and Christians Nicene, respectively. The contentions that permeated this theme sought the legitimacy of the Orthodox religion based on its interpretations of the nature of Logos, the second person of the Trinity. Within the enumerable religious groups that have discussed the theme, we have aimed in this article to understand the circumstances of the development of the Aryan controversy starting from the conflict between the Aryan, Eunomius of Cizic, and the Nicene, Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD). Our purpose has gone beyond the purely religious and theological aspects, as we have set down in the rhetorical analysis, a methodology to find elements of the ideal and the politico-religious propaganda of these two Christian bishops. To achieve this end, we intend to analyze and compare their testimonies Apology e Against Eunomius, respectively, using the manual Aristotle's Rhetorical Art. Antiguidade Tardia Conflito político-religioso Arianismo Eunômio de Cízico Basílio de Cesaréia Late Antiquity Politico-religious Conflict Arianism Eunomius of Cizic Basil of Caesarea History (General) In História Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, 2007 29(2010), 1, Seite 211-232 (DE-627)565518917 (DE-600)2424437-5 19804369 nnns volume:29 year:2010 number:1 pages:211-232 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-90742010000100013 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0101-9074 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1980-4369 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 29 2010 1 211-232
allfieldsSound	10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 doi (DE-627)DOAJ054079373 (DE-599)DOAJd97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por D1-2009 Helena Amália Papa verfasserin aut Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Os bispos cristãos Eunômio de Cízico (335-394 d.C.) e Basílio de Cesaréia (329/331-379 d.C.) representavam os ideais político-religiosos de dois grupos: cristãos arianos e cristãos nicenos, respectivamente. As contendas que permearam essa temática buscaram a legitimidade de uma ortodoxia religiosa baseado em suas interpretações sobre a natureza do Verbo, a segunda pessoa da Trindade. Dentre os inúmeros grupos religiosos que discutiram o tema objetivamos, neste artigo, compreender as circunstâncias do desenvolvimento da controvérsia ariana a partir do conflito entre o ariano Eunômio de Cízico e o niceno Basílio de Cesaréia. Nossa proposta vai além dos aspectos puramente religiosos e teológicos, pois depositamos na análise retórica uma metodologia para encontrar elementos do ideal e da propaganda político-religiosos desses dois bispos cristãos. Para atingir tal fim, pretendemos analisar e comparar seus testemunhos Apologia e Contra Eunômio, respectivamente, empregando o manual de Aristóteles Arte Retórica.<br<The Christian bishops Eunomius of Cyzic (335-394 AD) and Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD) represented the politico-religious ideals of two christian groups: Arian Christians and Christians Nicene, respectively. The contentions that permeated this theme sought the legitimacy of the Orthodox religion based on its interpretations of the nature of Logos, the second person of the Trinity. Within the enumerable religious groups that have discussed the theme, we have aimed in this article to understand the circumstances of the development of the Aryan controversy starting from the conflict between the Aryan, Eunomius of Cizic, and the Nicene, Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD). Our purpose has gone beyond the purely religious and theological aspects, as we have set down in the rhetorical analysis, a methodology to find elements of the ideal and the politico-religious propaganda of these two Christian bishops. To achieve this end, we intend to analyze and compare their testimonies Apology e Against Eunomius, respectively, using the manual Aristotle's Rhetorical Art. Antiguidade Tardia Conflito político-religioso Arianismo Eunômio de Cízico Basílio de Cesaréia Late Antiquity Politico-religious Conflict Arianism Eunomius of Cizic Basil of Caesarea History (General) In História Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, 2007 29(2010), 1, Seite 211-232 (DE-627)565518917 (DE-600)2424437-5 19804369 nnns volume:29 year:2010 number:1 pages:211-232 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-90742010000100013 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0101-9074 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1980-4369 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 29 2010 1 211-232
language	English Spanish Portuguese
source	In História 29(2010), 1, Seite 211-232 volume:29 year:2010 number:1 pages:211-232
sourceStr	In História 29(2010), 1, Seite 211-232 volume:29 year:2010 number:1 pages:211-232
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Antiguidade Tardia Conflito político-religioso Arianismo Eunômio de Cízico Basílio de Cesaréia Late Antiquity Politico-religious Conflict Arianism Eunomius of Cizic Basil of Caesarea History (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	História
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Helena Amália Papa @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2010-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	565518917
id	DOAJ054079373
language_de	englisch spanisch portugiesisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ054079373</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308181010.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2010 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ054079373</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">D1-2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Helena Amália Papa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Os bispos cristãos Eunômio de Cízico (335-394 d.C.) e Basílio de Cesaréia (329/331-379 d.C.) representavam os ideais político-religiosos de dois grupos: cristãos arianos e cristãos nicenos, respectivamente. As contendas que permearam essa temática buscaram a legitimidade de uma ortodoxia religiosa baseado em suas interpretações sobre a natureza do Verbo, a segunda pessoa da Trindade. Dentre os inúmeros grupos religiosos que discutiram o tema objetivamos, neste artigo, compreender as circunstâncias do desenvolvimento da controvérsia ariana a partir do conflito entre o ariano Eunômio de Cízico e o niceno Basílio de Cesaréia. Nossa proposta vai além dos aspectos puramente religiosos e teológicos, pois depositamos na análise retórica uma metodologia para encontrar elementos do ideal e da propaganda político-religiosos desses dois bispos cristãos. Para atingir tal fim, pretendemos analisar e comparar seus testemunhos Apologia e Contra Eunômio, respectivamente, empregando o manual de Aristóteles Arte Retórica.<br<The Christian bishops Eunomius of Cyzic (335-394 AD) and Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD) represented the politico-religious ideals of two christian groups: Arian Christians and Christians Nicene, respectively. The contentions that permeated this theme sought the legitimacy of the Orthodox religion based on its interpretations of the nature of Logos, the second person of the Trinity. Within the enumerable religious groups that have discussed the theme, we have aimed in this article to understand the circumstances of the development of the Aryan controversy starting from the conflict between the Aryan, Eunomius of Cizic, and the Nicene, Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD). Our purpose has gone beyond the purely religious and theological aspects, as we have set down in the rhetorical analysis, a methodology to find elements of the ideal and the politico-religious propaganda of these two Christian bishops. To achieve this end, we intend to analyze and compare their testimonies Apology e Against Eunomius, respectively, using the manual Aristotle's Rhetorical Art.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Antiguidade Tardia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflito político-religioso</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arianismo</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eunômio de Cízico</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Basílio de Cesaréia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Late Antiquity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politico-religious Conflict</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arianism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eunomius of Cizic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Basil of Caesarea</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">History (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">História</subfield><subfield code="d">Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2010), 1, Seite 211-232</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)565518917</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2424437-5</subfield><subfield code="x">19804369</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:211-232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-90742010000100013</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0101-9074</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1980-4369</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">211-232</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	D - World History
author	Helena Amália Papa
spellingShingle	Helena Amália Papa misc D1-2009 misc Antiguidade Tardia misc Conflito político-religioso misc Arianismo misc Eunômio de Cízico misc Basílio de Cesaréia misc Late Antiquity misc Politico-religious Conflict misc Arianism misc Eunomius of Cizic misc Basil of Caesarea misc History (General) Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle
authorStr	Helena Amália Papa
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)565518917
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	D1-2009
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	19804369
topic_title	D1-2009 Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle Antiguidade Tardia Conflito político-religioso Arianismo Eunômio de Cízico Basílio de Cesaréia Late Antiquity Politico-religious Conflict Arianism Eunomius of Cizic Basil of Caesarea
topic	misc D1-2009 misc Antiguidade Tardia misc Conflito político-religioso misc Arianismo misc Eunômio de Cízico misc Basílio de Cesaréia misc Late Antiquity misc Politico-religious Conflict misc Arianism misc Eunomius of Cizic misc Basil of Caesarea misc History (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc D1-2009 misc Antiguidade Tardia misc Conflito político-religioso misc Arianismo misc Eunômio de Cízico misc Basílio de Cesaréia misc Late Antiquity misc Politico-religious Conflict misc Arianism misc Eunomius of Cizic misc Basil of Caesarea misc History (General)
topic_browse	misc D1-2009 misc Antiguidade Tardia misc Conflito político-religioso misc Arianismo misc Eunômio de Cízico misc Basílio de Cesaréia misc Late Antiquity misc Politico-religious Conflict misc Arianism misc Eunomius of Cizic misc Basil of Caesarea misc History (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	História
hierarchy_parent_id	565518917
hierarchy_top_title	História
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)565518917 (DE-600)2424437-5
title	Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ054079373 (DE-599)DOAJd97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c
title_full	Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle
author_sort	Helena Amália Papa
journal	História
journalStr	História
callnumber-first-code	D
lang_code	eng spa por
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2010
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	211
author_browse	Helena Amália Papa
container_volume	29
class	D1-2009
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Helena Amália Papa
doi_str_mv	10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013
title_sort	conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre eunômio de cízico e basílio de cesaréia: utilização do manual de aristóteles politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between eunomius of cizic and basil of caesarea: application of the manual of aristotle
callnumber	D1-2009
title_auth	Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle
abstract	Os bispos cristãos Eunômio de Cízico (335-394 d.C.) e Basílio de Cesaréia (329/331-379 d.C.) representavam os ideais político-religiosos de dois grupos: cristãos arianos e cristãos nicenos, respectivamente. As contendas que permearam essa temática buscaram a legitimidade de uma ortodoxia religiosa baseado em suas interpretações sobre a natureza do Verbo, a segunda pessoa da Trindade. Dentre os inúmeros grupos religiosos que discutiram o tema objetivamos, neste artigo, compreender as circunstâncias do desenvolvimento da controvérsia ariana a partir do conflito entre o ariano Eunômio de Cízico e o niceno Basílio de Cesaréia. Nossa proposta vai além dos aspectos puramente religiosos e teológicos, pois depositamos na análise retórica uma metodologia para encontrar elementos do ideal e da propaganda político-religiosos desses dois bispos cristãos. Para atingir tal fim, pretendemos analisar e comparar seus testemunhos Apologia e Contra Eunômio, respectivamente, empregando o manual de Aristóteles Arte Retórica.<br<The Christian bishops Eunomius of Cyzic (335-394 AD) and Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD) represented the politico-religious ideals of two christian groups: Arian Christians and Christians Nicene, respectively. The contentions that permeated this theme sought the legitimacy of the Orthodox religion based on its interpretations of the nature of Logos, the second person of the Trinity. Within the enumerable religious groups that have discussed the theme, we have aimed in this article to understand the circumstances of the development of the Aryan controversy starting from the conflict between the Aryan, Eunomius of Cizic, and the Nicene, Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD). Our purpose has gone beyond the purely religious and theological aspects, as we have set down in the rhetorical analysis, a methodology to find elements of the ideal and the politico-religious propaganda of these two Christian bishops. To achieve this end, we intend to analyze and compare their testimonies Apology e Against Eunomius, respectively, using the manual Aristotle's Rhetorical Art.
abstractGer	Os bispos cristãos Eunômio de Cízico (335-394 d.C.) e Basílio de Cesaréia (329/331-379 d.C.) representavam os ideais político-religiosos de dois grupos: cristãos arianos e cristãos nicenos, respectivamente. As contendas que permearam essa temática buscaram a legitimidade de uma ortodoxia religiosa baseado em suas interpretações sobre a natureza do Verbo, a segunda pessoa da Trindade. Dentre os inúmeros grupos religiosos que discutiram o tema objetivamos, neste artigo, compreender as circunstâncias do desenvolvimento da controvérsia ariana a partir do conflito entre o ariano Eunômio de Cízico e o niceno Basílio de Cesaréia. Nossa proposta vai além dos aspectos puramente religiosos e teológicos, pois depositamos na análise retórica uma metodologia para encontrar elementos do ideal e da propaganda político-religiosos desses dois bispos cristãos. Para atingir tal fim, pretendemos analisar e comparar seus testemunhos Apologia e Contra Eunômio, respectivamente, empregando o manual de Aristóteles Arte Retórica.<br<The Christian bishops Eunomius of Cyzic (335-394 AD) and Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD) represented the politico-religious ideals of two christian groups: Arian Christians and Christians Nicene, respectively. The contentions that permeated this theme sought the legitimacy of the Orthodox religion based on its interpretations of the nature of Logos, the second person of the Trinity. Within the enumerable religious groups that have discussed the theme, we have aimed in this article to understand the circumstances of the development of the Aryan controversy starting from the conflict between the Aryan, Eunomius of Cizic, and the Nicene, Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD). Our purpose has gone beyond the purely religious and theological aspects, as we have set down in the rhetorical analysis, a methodology to find elements of the ideal and the politico-religious propaganda of these two Christian bishops. To achieve this end, we intend to analyze and compare their testimonies Apology e Against Eunomius, respectively, using the manual Aristotle's Rhetorical Art.
abstract_unstemmed	Os bispos cristãos Eunômio de Cízico (335-394 d.C.) e Basílio de Cesaréia (329/331-379 d.C.) representavam os ideais político-religiosos de dois grupos: cristãos arianos e cristãos nicenos, respectivamente. As contendas que permearam essa temática buscaram a legitimidade de uma ortodoxia religiosa baseado em suas interpretações sobre a natureza do Verbo, a segunda pessoa da Trindade. Dentre os inúmeros grupos religiosos que discutiram o tema objetivamos, neste artigo, compreender as circunstâncias do desenvolvimento da controvérsia ariana a partir do conflito entre o ariano Eunômio de Cízico e o niceno Basílio de Cesaréia. Nossa proposta vai além dos aspectos puramente religiosos e teológicos, pois depositamos na análise retórica uma metodologia para encontrar elementos do ideal e da propaganda político-religiosos desses dois bispos cristãos. Para atingir tal fim, pretendemos analisar e comparar seus testemunhos Apologia e Contra Eunômio, respectivamente, empregando o manual de Aristóteles Arte Retórica.<br<The Christian bishops Eunomius of Cyzic (335-394 AD) and Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD) represented the politico-religious ideals of two christian groups: Arian Christians and Christians Nicene, respectively. The contentions that permeated this theme sought the legitimacy of the Orthodox religion based on its interpretations of the nature of Logos, the second person of the Trinity. Within the enumerable religious groups that have discussed the theme, we have aimed in this article to understand the circumstances of the development of the Aryan controversy starting from the conflict between the Aryan, Eunomius of Cizic, and the Nicene, Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD). Our purpose has gone beyond the purely religious and theological aspects, as we have set down in the rhetorical analysis, a methodology to find elements of the ideal and the politico-religious propaganda of these two Christian bishops. To achieve this end, we intend to analyze and compare their testimonies Apology e Against Eunomius, respectively, using the manual Aristotle's Rhetorical Art.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle
url	https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013 https://doaj.org/article/d97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-90742010000100013 https://doaj.org/toc/0101-9074 https://doaj.org/toc/1980-4369
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	565518917
callnumber-subject	D - General History
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013
callnumber-a	D1-2009
up_date	2024-07-03T21:12:42.804Z
_version_	1803593882330464256
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ054079373</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308181010.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2010 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ054079373</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">D1-2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Helena Amália Papa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Os bispos cristãos Eunômio de Cízico (335-394 d.C.) e Basílio de Cesaréia (329/331-379 d.C.) representavam os ideais político-religiosos de dois grupos: cristãos arianos e cristãos nicenos, respectivamente. As contendas que permearam essa temática buscaram a legitimidade de uma ortodoxia religiosa baseado em suas interpretações sobre a natureza do Verbo, a segunda pessoa da Trindade. Dentre os inúmeros grupos religiosos que discutiram o tema objetivamos, neste artigo, compreender as circunstâncias do desenvolvimento da controvérsia ariana a partir do conflito entre o ariano Eunômio de Cízico e o niceno Basílio de Cesaréia. Nossa proposta vai além dos aspectos puramente religiosos e teológicos, pois depositamos na análise retórica uma metodologia para encontrar elementos do ideal e da propaganda político-religiosos desses dois bispos cristãos. Para atingir tal fim, pretendemos analisar e comparar seus testemunhos Apologia e Contra Eunômio, respectivamente, empregando o manual de Aristóteles Arte Retórica.<br<The Christian bishops Eunomius of Cyzic (335-394 AD) and Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD) represented the politico-religious ideals of two christian groups: Arian Christians and Christians Nicene, respectively. The contentions that permeated this theme sought the legitimacy of the Orthodox religion based on its interpretations of the nature of Logos, the second person of the Trinity. Within the enumerable religious groups that have discussed the theme, we have aimed in this article to understand the circumstances of the development of the Aryan controversy starting from the conflict between the Aryan, Eunomius of Cizic, and the Nicene, Basil of Caesarea (329/331-379 AD). Our purpose has gone beyond the purely religious and theological aspects, as we have set down in the rhetorical analysis, a methodology to find elements of the ideal and the politico-religious propaganda of these two Christian bishops. To achieve this end, we intend to analyze and compare their testimonies Apology e Against Eunomius, respectively, using the manual Aristotle's Rhetorical Art.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Antiguidade Tardia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflito político-religioso</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arianismo</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eunômio de Cízico</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Basílio de Cesaréia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Late Antiquity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politico-religious Conflict</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arianism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eunomius of Cizic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Basil of Caesarea</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">History (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">História</subfield><subfield code="d">Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2010), 1, Seite 211-232</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)565518917</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2424437-5</subfield><subfield code="x">19804369</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:211-232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-90742010000100013</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d97c42bd99a1468fbca293ed4110f20c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-90742010000100013</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0101-9074</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1980-4369</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">211-232</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.396368

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Conflito político-religioso e embate discursivo entre Eunômio de Cízico e Basílio de Cesaréia: utilização do manual de Aristóteles Politico-religious conflict and discursive clash between Eunomius of Cizic and Basil of Caesarea: application of the manual of Aristotle

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?