Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study

Diabetes mellitus is known to compromise the various aspects of homeostasis, including the immune response and the composition of oral microflora. One of the oral manifestations of diabetes mellitus is tooth loss and the survival rate of dental implants chosen as a treatment modality for its rehabilitation is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate and compare the failure rate of dental implants between well-controlled diabetic and healthy patients. A retrospective study of case-control design was conceptualized with 121 well-controlled diabetic and 136 healthy individuals. Records of subjects who had undergone oral rehabilitation with dental implants between the periods of January 2013 to January 2016 were retrieved. Post-operative evaluation was carried out for all patients for about three years to assess the immediate and long-term success of the procedure. From a total of 742 dental implants, 377 were placed in well-controlled diabetic patients (case group) and 365 in healthy subjects (control group). A comparable (9.81%), but non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.422) failure rate was found in the case group in comparison to the control group (9.04%). A non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.392) raised number (4.98%) of failure cases were reported among females in comparison to males (4.44%). In respect to arch, the mandibular posterior region was reported as the highest failure cases (3.09%; <i<p </i<= 0.411), with 2.29% of cases reported in the mandibular anterior (<i<p </i<= 0.430) and maxillary posterior (<i<p </i<= 0.983) each. The maxillary anterior region was found to have the least number (1.75%; <i<p </i<= 0.999) of failure cases. More (4.98%; <i<p </i<= 0.361) cases were reported to fail during the functional loading stage in contrast to osseointegration (4.44%; <i<p </i<= 0.365). A well-controlled diabetic status does not impose any additional risk for individuals undergoing dental implant therapy. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen [verfasserIn] Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish [verfasserIn] Kumar Chandan Srivastava [verfasserIn] Deepti Shrivastava [verfasserIn] Santosh R. Patil [verfasserIn] Selham Al Habib [verfasserIn] May Hamza [verfasserIn] Saifulizan Ab Rahman [verfasserIn] Edward Lynch [verfasserIn] Mohammad Khursheed Alam [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	dental implant diabetes mellitus dental implant survival peri-implantitis implant osseointegration

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health - MDPI AG, 2005, 17(2020), 5253, p 5253
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:17 ; year:2020 ; number:5253, p 5253

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/ijerph17145253

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ054364132

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ054364132
003	DE-627
005	20230503055717.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/ijerph17145253 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ054364132
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJc0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Diabetes mellitus is known to compromise the various aspects of homeostasis, including the immune response and the composition of oral microflora. One of the oral manifestations of diabetes mellitus is tooth loss and the survival rate of dental implants chosen as a treatment modality for its rehabilitation is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate and compare the failure rate of dental implants between well-controlled diabetic and healthy patients. A retrospective study of case-control design was conceptualized with 121 well-controlled diabetic and 136 healthy individuals. Records of subjects who had undergone oral rehabilitation with dental implants between the periods of January 2013 to January 2016 were retrieved. Post-operative evaluation was carried out for all patients for about three years to assess the immediate and long-term success of the procedure. From a total of 742 dental implants, 377 were placed in well-controlled diabetic patients (case group) and 365 in healthy subjects (control group). A comparable (9.81%), but non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.422) failure rate was found in the case group in comparison to the control group (9.04%). A non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.392) raised number (4.98%) of failure cases were reported among females in comparison to males (4.44%). In respect to arch, the mandibular posterior region was reported as the highest failure cases (3.09%; <i<p </i<= 0.411), with 2.29% of cases reported in the mandibular anterior (<i<p </i<= 0.430) and maxillary posterior (<i<p </i<= 0.983) each. The maxillary anterior region was found to have the least number (1.75%; <i<p </i<= 0.999) of failure cases. More (4.98%; <i<p </i<= 0.361) cases were reported to fail during the functional loading stage in contrast to osseointegration (4.44%; <i<p </i<= 0.365). A well-controlled diabetic status does not impose any additional risk for individuals undergoing dental implant therapy.
650		4	\|a dental implant
650		4	\|a diabetes mellitus
650		4	\|a dental implant survival
650		4	\|a peri-implantitis
650		4	\|a implant osseointegration
653		0	\|a Medicine
653		0	\|a R
700	0		\|a Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Kumar Chandan Srivastava \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Deepti Shrivastava \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Santosh R. Patil \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Selham Al Habib \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a May Hamza \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Saifulizan Ab Rahman \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Edward Lynch \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Mohammad Khursheed Alam \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health \|d MDPI AG, 2005 \|g 17(2020), 5253, p 5253 \|w (DE-627)477992463 \|w (DE-600)2175195-X \|x 16604601 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:17 \|g year:2020 \|g number:5253, p 5253
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145253 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/c0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5253 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 17 \|j 2020 \|e 5253, p 5253

Indexfelder

author_variant	m g s mgs a a a aaa k c s kcs d s ds s r p srp s a h sah m h mh s a r sar e l el m k a mka
matchkey_str	article:16604601:2020----::oprtveautoodnaipatalraogelhadelotoldibtcai
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
publishDate	2020
allfields	10.3390/ijerph17145253 doi (DE-627)DOAJ054364132 (DE-599)DOAJc0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen verfasserin aut Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Diabetes mellitus is known to compromise the various aspects of homeostasis, including the immune response and the composition of oral microflora. One of the oral manifestations of diabetes mellitus is tooth loss and the survival rate of dental implants chosen as a treatment modality for its rehabilitation is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate and compare the failure rate of dental implants between well-controlled diabetic and healthy patients. A retrospective study of case-control design was conceptualized with 121 well-controlled diabetic and 136 healthy individuals. Records of subjects who had undergone oral rehabilitation with dental implants between the periods of January 2013 to January 2016 were retrieved. Post-operative evaluation was carried out for all patients for about three years to assess the immediate and long-term success of the procedure. From a total of 742 dental implants, 377 were placed in well-controlled diabetic patients (case group) and 365 in healthy subjects (control group). A comparable (9.81%), but non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.422) failure rate was found in the case group in comparison to the control group (9.04%). A non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.392) raised number (4.98%) of failure cases were reported among females in comparison to males (4.44%). In respect to arch, the mandibular posterior region was reported as the highest failure cases (3.09%; <i<p </i<= 0.411), with 2.29% of cases reported in the mandibular anterior (<i<p </i<= 0.430) and maxillary posterior (<i<p </i<= 0.983) each. The maxillary anterior region was found to have the least number (1.75%; <i<p </i<= 0.999) of failure cases. More (4.98%; <i<p </i<= 0.361) cases were reported to fail during the functional loading stage in contrast to osseointegration (4.44%; <i<p </i<= 0.365). A well-controlled diabetic status does not impose any additional risk for individuals undergoing dental implant therapy. dental implant diabetes mellitus dental implant survival peri-implantitis implant osseointegration Medicine R Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish verfasserin aut Kumar Chandan Srivastava verfasserin aut Deepti Shrivastava verfasserin aut Santosh R. Patil verfasserin aut Selham Al Habib verfasserin aut May Hamza verfasserin aut Saifulizan Ab Rahman verfasserin aut Edward Lynch verfasserin aut Mohammad Khursheed Alam verfasserin aut In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health MDPI AG, 2005 17(2020), 5253, p 5253 (DE-627)477992463 (DE-600)2175195-X 16604601 nnns volume:17 year:2020 number:5253, p 5253 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145253 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5253 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2020 5253, p 5253
spelling	10.3390/ijerph17145253 doi (DE-627)DOAJ054364132 (DE-599)DOAJc0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen verfasserin aut Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Diabetes mellitus is known to compromise the various aspects of homeostasis, including the immune response and the composition of oral microflora. One of the oral manifestations of diabetes mellitus is tooth loss and the survival rate of dental implants chosen as a treatment modality for its rehabilitation is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate and compare the failure rate of dental implants between well-controlled diabetic and healthy patients. A retrospective study of case-control design was conceptualized with 121 well-controlled diabetic and 136 healthy individuals. Records of subjects who had undergone oral rehabilitation with dental implants between the periods of January 2013 to January 2016 were retrieved. Post-operative evaluation was carried out for all patients for about three years to assess the immediate and long-term success of the procedure. From a total of 742 dental implants, 377 were placed in well-controlled diabetic patients (case group) and 365 in healthy subjects (control group). A comparable (9.81%), but non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.422) failure rate was found in the case group in comparison to the control group (9.04%). A non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.392) raised number (4.98%) of failure cases were reported among females in comparison to males (4.44%). In respect to arch, the mandibular posterior region was reported as the highest failure cases (3.09%; <i<p </i<= 0.411), with 2.29% of cases reported in the mandibular anterior (<i<p </i<= 0.430) and maxillary posterior (<i<p </i<= 0.983) each. The maxillary anterior region was found to have the least number (1.75%; <i<p </i<= 0.999) of failure cases. More (4.98%; <i<p </i<= 0.361) cases were reported to fail during the functional loading stage in contrast to osseointegration (4.44%; <i<p </i<= 0.365). A well-controlled diabetic status does not impose any additional risk for individuals undergoing dental implant therapy. dental implant diabetes mellitus dental implant survival peri-implantitis implant osseointegration Medicine R Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish verfasserin aut Kumar Chandan Srivastava verfasserin aut Deepti Shrivastava verfasserin aut Santosh R. Patil verfasserin aut Selham Al Habib verfasserin aut May Hamza verfasserin aut Saifulizan Ab Rahman verfasserin aut Edward Lynch verfasserin aut Mohammad Khursheed Alam verfasserin aut In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health MDPI AG, 2005 17(2020), 5253, p 5253 (DE-627)477992463 (DE-600)2175195-X 16604601 nnns volume:17 year:2020 number:5253, p 5253 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145253 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5253 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2020 5253, p 5253
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/ijerph17145253 doi (DE-627)DOAJ054364132 (DE-599)DOAJc0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen verfasserin aut Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Diabetes mellitus is known to compromise the various aspects of homeostasis, including the immune response and the composition of oral microflora. One of the oral manifestations of diabetes mellitus is tooth loss and the survival rate of dental implants chosen as a treatment modality for its rehabilitation is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate and compare the failure rate of dental implants between well-controlled diabetic and healthy patients. A retrospective study of case-control design was conceptualized with 121 well-controlled diabetic and 136 healthy individuals. Records of subjects who had undergone oral rehabilitation with dental implants between the periods of January 2013 to January 2016 were retrieved. Post-operative evaluation was carried out for all patients for about three years to assess the immediate and long-term success of the procedure. From a total of 742 dental implants, 377 were placed in well-controlled diabetic patients (case group) and 365 in healthy subjects (control group). A comparable (9.81%), but non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.422) failure rate was found in the case group in comparison to the control group (9.04%). A non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.392) raised number (4.98%) of failure cases were reported among females in comparison to males (4.44%). In respect to arch, the mandibular posterior region was reported as the highest failure cases (3.09%; <i<p </i<= 0.411), with 2.29% of cases reported in the mandibular anterior (<i<p </i<= 0.430) and maxillary posterior (<i<p </i<= 0.983) each. The maxillary anterior region was found to have the least number (1.75%; <i<p </i<= 0.999) of failure cases. More (4.98%; <i<p </i<= 0.361) cases were reported to fail during the functional loading stage in contrast to osseointegration (4.44%; <i<p </i<= 0.365). A well-controlled diabetic status does not impose any additional risk for individuals undergoing dental implant therapy. dental implant diabetes mellitus dental implant survival peri-implantitis implant osseointegration Medicine R Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish verfasserin aut Kumar Chandan Srivastava verfasserin aut Deepti Shrivastava verfasserin aut Santosh R. Patil verfasserin aut Selham Al Habib verfasserin aut May Hamza verfasserin aut Saifulizan Ab Rahman verfasserin aut Edward Lynch verfasserin aut Mohammad Khursheed Alam verfasserin aut In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health MDPI AG, 2005 17(2020), 5253, p 5253 (DE-627)477992463 (DE-600)2175195-X 16604601 nnns volume:17 year:2020 number:5253, p 5253 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145253 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5253 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2020 5253, p 5253
allfieldsGer	10.3390/ijerph17145253 doi (DE-627)DOAJ054364132 (DE-599)DOAJc0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen verfasserin aut Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Diabetes mellitus is known to compromise the various aspects of homeostasis, including the immune response and the composition of oral microflora. One of the oral manifestations of diabetes mellitus is tooth loss and the survival rate of dental implants chosen as a treatment modality for its rehabilitation is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate and compare the failure rate of dental implants between well-controlled diabetic and healthy patients. A retrospective study of case-control design was conceptualized with 121 well-controlled diabetic and 136 healthy individuals. Records of subjects who had undergone oral rehabilitation with dental implants between the periods of January 2013 to January 2016 were retrieved. Post-operative evaluation was carried out for all patients for about three years to assess the immediate and long-term success of the procedure. From a total of 742 dental implants, 377 were placed in well-controlled diabetic patients (case group) and 365 in healthy subjects (control group). A comparable (9.81%), but non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.422) failure rate was found in the case group in comparison to the control group (9.04%). A non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.392) raised number (4.98%) of failure cases were reported among females in comparison to males (4.44%). In respect to arch, the mandibular posterior region was reported as the highest failure cases (3.09%; <i<p </i<= 0.411), with 2.29% of cases reported in the mandibular anterior (<i<p </i<= 0.430) and maxillary posterior (<i<p </i<= 0.983) each. The maxillary anterior region was found to have the least number (1.75%; <i<p </i<= 0.999) of failure cases. More (4.98%; <i<p </i<= 0.361) cases were reported to fail during the functional loading stage in contrast to osseointegration (4.44%; <i<p </i<= 0.365). A well-controlled diabetic status does not impose any additional risk for individuals undergoing dental implant therapy. dental implant diabetes mellitus dental implant survival peri-implantitis implant osseointegration Medicine R Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish verfasserin aut Kumar Chandan Srivastava verfasserin aut Deepti Shrivastava verfasserin aut Santosh R. Patil verfasserin aut Selham Al Habib verfasserin aut May Hamza verfasserin aut Saifulizan Ab Rahman verfasserin aut Edward Lynch verfasserin aut Mohammad Khursheed Alam verfasserin aut In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health MDPI AG, 2005 17(2020), 5253, p 5253 (DE-627)477992463 (DE-600)2175195-X 16604601 nnns volume:17 year:2020 number:5253, p 5253 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145253 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5253 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2020 5253, p 5253
allfieldsSound	10.3390/ijerph17145253 doi (DE-627)DOAJ054364132 (DE-599)DOAJc0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen verfasserin aut Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Diabetes mellitus is known to compromise the various aspects of homeostasis, including the immune response and the composition of oral microflora. One of the oral manifestations of diabetes mellitus is tooth loss and the survival rate of dental implants chosen as a treatment modality for its rehabilitation is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate and compare the failure rate of dental implants between well-controlled diabetic and healthy patients. A retrospective study of case-control design was conceptualized with 121 well-controlled diabetic and 136 healthy individuals. Records of subjects who had undergone oral rehabilitation with dental implants between the periods of January 2013 to January 2016 were retrieved. Post-operative evaluation was carried out for all patients for about three years to assess the immediate and long-term success of the procedure. From a total of 742 dental implants, 377 were placed in well-controlled diabetic patients (case group) and 365 in healthy subjects (control group). A comparable (9.81%), but non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.422) failure rate was found in the case group in comparison to the control group (9.04%). A non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.392) raised number (4.98%) of failure cases were reported among females in comparison to males (4.44%). In respect to arch, the mandibular posterior region was reported as the highest failure cases (3.09%; <i<p </i<= 0.411), with 2.29% of cases reported in the mandibular anterior (<i<p </i<= 0.430) and maxillary posterior (<i<p </i<= 0.983) each. The maxillary anterior region was found to have the least number (1.75%; <i<p </i<= 0.999) of failure cases. More (4.98%; <i<p </i<= 0.361) cases were reported to fail during the functional loading stage in contrast to osseointegration (4.44%; <i<p </i<= 0.365). A well-controlled diabetic status does not impose any additional risk for individuals undergoing dental implant therapy. dental implant diabetes mellitus dental implant survival peri-implantitis implant osseointegration Medicine R Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish verfasserin aut Kumar Chandan Srivastava verfasserin aut Deepti Shrivastava verfasserin aut Santosh R. Patil verfasserin aut Selham Al Habib verfasserin aut May Hamza verfasserin aut Saifulizan Ab Rahman verfasserin aut Edward Lynch verfasserin aut Mohammad Khursheed Alam verfasserin aut In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health MDPI AG, 2005 17(2020), 5253, p 5253 (DE-627)477992463 (DE-600)2175195-X 16604601 nnns volume:17 year:2020 number:5253, p 5253 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145253 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/c0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5253 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 17 2020 5253, p 5253
language	English
source	In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(2020), 5253, p 5253 volume:17 year:2020 number:5253, p 5253
sourceStr	In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(2020), 5253, p 5253 volume:17 year:2020 number:5253, p 5253
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	dental implant diabetes mellitus dental implant survival peri-implantitis implant osseointegration Medicine R
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen @@aut@@ Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish @@aut@@ Kumar Chandan Srivastava @@aut@@ Deepti Shrivastava @@aut@@ Santosh R. Patil @@aut@@ Selham Al Habib @@aut@@ May Hamza @@aut@@ Saifulizan Ab Rahman @@aut@@ Edward Lynch @@aut@@ Mohammad Khursheed Alam @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	477992463
id	DOAJ054364132
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ054364132</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503055717.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/ijerph17145253</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ054364132</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJc0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diabetes mellitus is known to compromise the various aspects of homeostasis, including the immune response and the composition of oral microflora. One of the oral manifestations of diabetes mellitus is tooth loss and the survival rate of dental implants chosen as a treatment modality for its rehabilitation is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate and compare the failure rate of dental implants between well-controlled diabetic and healthy patients. A retrospective study of case-control design was conceptualized with 121 well-controlled diabetic and 136 healthy individuals. Records of subjects who had undergone oral rehabilitation with dental implants between the periods of January 2013 to January 2016 were retrieved. Post-operative evaluation was carried out for all patients for about three years to assess the immediate and long-term success of the procedure. From a total of 742 dental implants, 377 were placed in well-controlled diabetic patients (case group) and 365 in healthy subjects (control group). A comparable (9.81%), but non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.422) failure rate was found in the case group in comparison to the control group (9.04%). A non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.392) raised number (4.98%) of failure cases were reported among females in comparison to males (4.44%). In respect to arch, the mandibular posterior region was reported as the highest failure cases (3.09%; <i<p </i<= 0.411), with 2.29% of cases reported in the mandibular anterior (<i<p </i<= 0.430) and maxillary posterior (<i<p </i<= 0.983) each. The maxillary anterior region was found to have the least number (1.75%; <i<p </i<= 0.999) of failure cases. More (4.98%; <i<p </i<= 0.361) cases were reported to fail during the functional loading stage in contrast to osseointegration (4.44%; <i<p </i<= 0.365). A well-controlled diabetic status does not impose any additional risk for individuals undergoing dental implant therapy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dental implant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">diabetes mellitus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dental implant survival</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">peri-implantitis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">implant osseointegration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kumar Chandan Srivastava</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Deepti Shrivastava</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Santosh R. Patil</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Selham Al Habib</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">May Hamza</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saifulizan Ab Rahman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Edward Lynch</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Khursheed Alam</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2020), 5253, p 5253</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)477992463</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2175195-X</subfield><subfield code="x">16604601</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5253, p 5253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145253</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/c0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5253</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">5253, p 5253</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen
spellingShingle	Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen misc dental implant misc diabetes mellitus misc dental implant survival misc peri-implantitis misc implant osseointegration misc Medicine misc R Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study
authorStr	Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)477992463
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	16604601
topic_title	Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study dental implant diabetes mellitus dental implant survival peri-implantitis implant osseointegration
topic	misc dental implant misc diabetes mellitus misc dental implant survival misc peri-implantitis misc implant osseointegration misc Medicine misc R
topic_unstemmed	misc dental implant misc diabetes mellitus misc dental implant survival misc peri-implantitis misc implant osseointegration misc Medicine misc R
topic_browse	misc dental implant misc diabetes mellitus misc dental implant survival misc peri-implantitis misc implant osseointegration misc Medicine misc R
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
hierarchy_parent_id	477992463
hierarchy_top_title	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)477992463 (DE-600)2175195-X
title	Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ054364132 (DE-599)DOAJc0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c
title_full	Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study
author_sort	Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen
journal	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
journalStr	International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish Kumar Chandan Srivastava Deepti Shrivastava Santosh R. Patil Selham Al Habib May Hamza Saifulizan Ab Rahman Edward Lynch Mohammad Khursheed Alam
container_volume	17
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen
doi_str_mv	10.3390/ijerph17145253
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	comparative evaluation of dental implant failure among healthy and well-controlled diabetic patients—a 3-year retrospective study
title_auth	Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study
abstract	Diabetes mellitus is known to compromise the various aspects of homeostasis, including the immune response and the composition of oral microflora. One of the oral manifestations of diabetes mellitus is tooth loss and the survival rate of dental implants chosen as a treatment modality for its rehabilitation is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate and compare the failure rate of dental implants between well-controlled diabetic and healthy patients. A retrospective study of case-control design was conceptualized with 121 well-controlled diabetic and 136 healthy individuals. Records of subjects who had undergone oral rehabilitation with dental implants between the periods of January 2013 to January 2016 were retrieved. Post-operative evaluation was carried out for all patients for about three years to assess the immediate and long-term success of the procedure. From a total of 742 dental implants, 377 were placed in well-controlled diabetic patients (case group) and 365 in healthy subjects (control group). A comparable (9.81%), but non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.422) failure rate was found in the case group in comparison to the control group (9.04%). A non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.392) raised number (4.98%) of failure cases were reported among females in comparison to males (4.44%). In respect to arch, the mandibular posterior region was reported as the highest failure cases (3.09%; <i<p </i<= 0.411), with 2.29% of cases reported in the mandibular anterior (<i<p </i<= 0.430) and maxillary posterior (<i<p </i<= 0.983) each. The maxillary anterior region was found to have the least number (1.75%; <i<p </i<= 0.999) of failure cases. More (4.98%; <i<p </i<= 0.361) cases were reported to fail during the functional loading stage in contrast to osseointegration (4.44%; <i<p </i<= 0.365). A well-controlled diabetic status does not impose any additional risk for individuals undergoing dental implant therapy.
abstractGer	Diabetes mellitus is known to compromise the various aspects of homeostasis, including the immune response and the composition of oral microflora. One of the oral manifestations of diabetes mellitus is tooth loss and the survival rate of dental implants chosen as a treatment modality for its rehabilitation is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate and compare the failure rate of dental implants between well-controlled diabetic and healthy patients. A retrospective study of case-control design was conceptualized with 121 well-controlled diabetic and 136 healthy individuals. Records of subjects who had undergone oral rehabilitation with dental implants between the periods of January 2013 to January 2016 were retrieved. Post-operative evaluation was carried out for all patients for about three years to assess the immediate and long-term success of the procedure. From a total of 742 dental implants, 377 were placed in well-controlled diabetic patients (case group) and 365 in healthy subjects (control group). A comparable (9.81%), but non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.422) failure rate was found in the case group in comparison to the control group (9.04%). A non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.392) raised number (4.98%) of failure cases were reported among females in comparison to males (4.44%). In respect to arch, the mandibular posterior region was reported as the highest failure cases (3.09%; <i<p </i<= 0.411), with 2.29% of cases reported in the mandibular anterior (<i<p </i<= 0.430) and maxillary posterior (<i<p </i<= 0.983) each. The maxillary anterior region was found to have the least number (1.75%; <i<p </i<= 0.999) of failure cases. More (4.98%; <i<p </i<= 0.361) cases were reported to fail during the functional loading stage in contrast to osseointegration (4.44%; <i<p </i<= 0.365). A well-controlled diabetic status does not impose any additional risk for individuals undergoing dental implant therapy.
abstract_unstemmed	Diabetes mellitus is known to compromise the various aspects of homeostasis, including the immune response and the composition of oral microflora. One of the oral manifestations of diabetes mellitus is tooth loss and the survival rate of dental implants chosen as a treatment modality for its rehabilitation is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate and compare the failure rate of dental implants between well-controlled diabetic and healthy patients. A retrospective study of case-control design was conceptualized with 121 well-controlled diabetic and 136 healthy individuals. Records of subjects who had undergone oral rehabilitation with dental implants between the periods of January 2013 to January 2016 were retrieved. Post-operative evaluation was carried out for all patients for about three years to assess the immediate and long-term success of the procedure. From a total of 742 dental implants, 377 were placed in well-controlled diabetic patients (case group) and 365 in healthy subjects (control group). A comparable (9.81%), but non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.422) failure rate was found in the case group in comparison to the control group (9.04%). A non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.392) raised number (4.98%) of failure cases were reported among females in comparison to males (4.44%). In respect to arch, the mandibular posterior region was reported as the highest failure cases (3.09%; <i<p </i<= 0.411), with 2.29% of cases reported in the mandibular anterior (<i<p </i<= 0.430) and maxillary posterior (<i<p </i<= 0.983) each. The maxillary anterior region was found to have the least number (1.75%; <i<p </i<= 0.999) of failure cases. More (4.98%; <i<p </i<= 0.361) cases were reported to fail during the functional loading stage in contrast to osseointegration (4.44%; <i<p </i<= 0.365). A well-controlled diabetic status does not impose any additional risk for individuals undergoing dental implant therapy.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	5253, p 5253
title_short	Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145253 https://doaj.org/article/c0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5253 https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827 https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601
remote_bool	true
author2	Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish Kumar Chandan Srivastava Deepti Shrivastava Santosh R. Patil Selham Al Habib May Hamza Saifulizan Ab Rahman Edward Lynch Mohammad Khursheed Alam
author2Str	Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish Kumar Chandan Srivastava Deepti Shrivastava Santosh R. Patil Selham Al Habib May Hamza Saifulizan Ab Rahman Edward Lynch Mohammad Khursheed Alam
ppnlink	477992463
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/ijerph17145253
up_date	2024-07-03T22:44:51.280Z
_version_	1803599679362957312
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ054364132</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503055717.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/ijerph17145253</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ054364132</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJc0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammed Ghazi Sghaireen</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Diabetes mellitus is known to compromise the various aspects of homeostasis, including the immune response and the composition of oral microflora. One of the oral manifestations of diabetes mellitus is tooth loss and the survival rate of dental implants chosen as a treatment modality for its rehabilitation is controversial. The current study aims to evaluate and compare the failure rate of dental implants between well-controlled diabetic and healthy patients. A retrospective study of case-control design was conceptualized with 121 well-controlled diabetic and 136 healthy individuals. Records of subjects who had undergone oral rehabilitation with dental implants between the periods of January 2013 to January 2016 were retrieved. Post-operative evaluation was carried out for all patients for about three years to assess the immediate and long-term success of the procedure. From a total of 742 dental implants, 377 were placed in well-controlled diabetic patients (case group) and 365 in healthy subjects (control group). A comparable (9.81%), but non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.422) failure rate was found in the case group in comparison to the control group (9.04%). A non-significant (<i<p </i<= 0.392) raised number (4.98%) of failure cases were reported among females in comparison to males (4.44%). In respect to arch, the mandibular posterior region was reported as the highest failure cases (3.09%; <i<p </i<= 0.411), with 2.29% of cases reported in the mandibular anterior (<i<p </i<= 0.430) and maxillary posterior (<i<p </i<= 0.983) each. The maxillary anterior region was found to have the least number (1.75%; <i<p </i<= 0.999) of failure cases. More (4.98%; <i<p </i<= 0.361) cases were reported to fail during the functional loading stage in contrast to osseointegration (4.44%; <i<p </i<= 0.365). A well-controlled diabetic status does not impose any additional risk for individuals undergoing dental implant therapy.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dental implant</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">diabetes mellitus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">dental implant survival</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">peri-implantitis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">implant osseointegration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abdulrahman A. Alduraywish</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kumar Chandan Srivastava</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Deepti Shrivastava</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Santosh R. Patil</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Selham Al Habib</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">May Hamza</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saifulizan Ab Rahman</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Edward Lynch</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Khursheed Alam</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2020), 5253, p 5253</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)477992463</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2175195-X</subfield><subfield code="x">16604601</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5253, p 5253</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17145253</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/c0e637e860a5465f8efdf9ff8dfdf63c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5253</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">5253, p 5253</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.40162

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients—A 3-Year Retrospective Study

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?