The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts

In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences an...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Matić-Bošković Marina [verfasserIn] Kostić Jelena [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; srp

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	financial offences misdemeanour offences criminal offences european courts jurisprudence ne bis in idem

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija - University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade, 2019, 25(2020), 2, Seite 67-77
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:25 ; year:2020 ; number:2 ; pages:67-77

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ054664187

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ054664187
003	DE-627
005	20230308183627.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ054664187
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJfe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a srp
050		0	\|a HV1-9960
100	0		\|a Matić-Bošković Marina \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	4	\|a The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences and misdemeanour offences, including administrative penal offences, against the same person for the same acts. Article followed the development in interpretation of the principle by the European Court of Human Rights in Zolotukhin case to the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the EU in Menci case. European Courts jurisprudence could be used for dialogue on challenges that the Serbian judiciary and tax authories are facing in the interpretation of legislation and application of ne bis in idem principle on criminal and misdemeanour proceedings against the same person for the same acts. The articile provides the basis for discussion on the unification of court practice.
650		4	\|a financial offences
650		4	\|a misdemeanour offences
650		4	\|a criminal offences
650		4	\|a european courts jurisprudence
650		4	\|a ne bis in idem
653		0	\|a Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
700	0		\|a Kostić Jelena \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija \|d University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade, 2019 \|g 25(2020), 2, Seite 67-77 \|w (DE-627)1760618985 \|x 26200406 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:25 \|g year:2020 \|g number:2 \|g pages:67-77
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/fe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2020/0354-88722002067M.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/0354-8872 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2620-0406 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2863
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4753
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 25 \|j 2020 \|e 2 \|h 67-77

Indexfelder

author_variant	m b m mbm k j kj
matchkey_str	article:26200406:2020----::hapiainfhnbsndmeaetfnnilfecsnhjrsr
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
callnumber-subject-code	HV
publishDate	2020
allfields	(DE-627)DOAJ054664187 (DE-599)DOAJfe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp HV1-9960 Matić-Bošković Marina verfasserin aut The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences and misdemeanour offences, including administrative penal offences, against the same person for the same acts. Article followed the development in interpretation of the principle by the European Court of Human Rights in Zolotukhin case to the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the EU in Menci case. European Courts jurisprudence could be used for dialogue on challenges that the Serbian judiciary and tax authories are facing in the interpretation of legislation and application of ne bis in idem principle on criminal and misdemeanour proceedings against the same person for the same acts. The articile provides the basis for discussion on the unification of court practice. financial offences misdemeanour offences criminal offences european courts jurisprudence ne bis in idem Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology Kostić Jelena verfasserin aut In NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade, 2019 25(2020), 2, Seite 67-77 (DE-627)1760618985 26200406 nnns volume:25 year:2020 number:2 pages:67-77 https://doaj.org/article/fe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445 kostenfrei https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2020/0354-88722002067M.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0354-8872 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2620-0406 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 25 2020 2 67-77
spelling	(DE-627)DOAJ054664187 (DE-599)DOAJfe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp HV1-9960 Matić-Bošković Marina verfasserin aut The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences and misdemeanour offences, including administrative penal offences, against the same person for the same acts. Article followed the development in interpretation of the principle by the European Court of Human Rights in Zolotukhin case to the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the EU in Menci case. European Courts jurisprudence could be used for dialogue on challenges that the Serbian judiciary and tax authories are facing in the interpretation of legislation and application of ne bis in idem principle on criminal and misdemeanour proceedings against the same person for the same acts. The articile provides the basis for discussion on the unification of court practice. financial offences misdemeanour offences criminal offences european courts jurisprudence ne bis in idem Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology Kostić Jelena verfasserin aut In NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade, 2019 25(2020), 2, Seite 67-77 (DE-627)1760618985 26200406 nnns volume:25 year:2020 number:2 pages:67-77 https://doaj.org/article/fe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445 kostenfrei https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2020/0354-88722002067M.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0354-8872 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2620-0406 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 25 2020 2 67-77
allfields_unstemmed	(DE-627)DOAJ054664187 (DE-599)DOAJfe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp HV1-9960 Matić-Bošković Marina verfasserin aut The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences and misdemeanour offences, including administrative penal offences, against the same person for the same acts. Article followed the development in interpretation of the principle by the European Court of Human Rights in Zolotukhin case to the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the EU in Menci case. European Courts jurisprudence could be used for dialogue on challenges that the Serbian judiciary and tax authories are facing in the interpretation of legislation and application of ne bis in idem principle on criminal and misdemeanour proceedings against the same person for the same acts. The articile provides the basis for discussion on the unification of court practice. financial offences misdemeanour offences criminal offences european courts jurisprudence ne bis in idem Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology Kostić Jelena verfasserin aut In NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade, 2019 25(2020), 2, Seite 67-77 (DE-627)1760618985 26200406 nnns volume:25 year:2020 number:2 pages:67-77 https://doaj.org/article/fe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445 kostenfrei https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2020/0354-88722002067M.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0354-8872 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2620-0406 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 25 2020 2 67-77
allfieldsGer	(DE-627)DOAJ054664187 (DE-599)DOAJfe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp HV1-9960 Matić-Bošković Marina verfasserin aut The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences and misdemeanour offences, including administrative penal offences, against the same person for the same acts. Article followed the development in interpretation of the principle by the European Court of Human Rights in Zolotukhin case to the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the EU in Menci case. European Courts jurisprudence could be used for dialogue on challenges that the Serbian judiciary and tax authories are facing in the interpretation of legislation and application of ne bis in idem principle on criminal and misdemeanour proceedings against the same person for the same acts. The articile provides the basis for discussion on the unification of court practice. financial offences misdemeanour offences criminal offences european courts jurisprudence ne bis in idem Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology Kostić Jelena verfasserin aut In NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade, 2019 25(2020), 2, Seite 67-77 (DE-627)1760618985 26200406 nnns volume:25 year:2020 number:2 pages:67-77 https://doaj.org/article/fe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445 kostenfrei https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2020/0354-88722002067M.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0354-8872 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2620-0406 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 25 2020 2 67-77
allfieldsSound	(DE-627)DOAJ054664187 (DE-599)DOAJfe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp HV1-9960 Matić-Bošković Marina verfasserin aut The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences and misdemeanour offences, including administrative penal offences, against the same person for the same acts. Article followed the development in interpretation of the principle by the European Court of Human Rights in Zolotukhin case to the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the EU in Menci case. European Courts jurisprudence could be used for dialogue on challenges that the Serbian judiciary and tax authories are facing in the interpretation of legislation and application of ne bis in idem principle on criminal and misdemeanour proceedings against the same person for the same acts. The articile provides the basis for discussion on the unification of court practice. financial offences misdemeanour offences criminal offences european courts jurisprudence ne bis in idem Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology Kostić Jelena verfasserin aut In NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade, 2019 25(2020), 2, Seite 67-77 (DE-627)1760618985 26200406 nnns volume:25 year:2020 number:2 pages:67-77 https://doaj.org/article/fe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445 kostenfrei https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2020/0354-88722002067M.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0354-8872 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2620-0406 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 25 2020 2 67-77
language	English
source	In NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija 25(2020), 2, Seite 67-77 volume:25 year:2020 number:2 pages:67-77
sourceStr	In NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija 25(2020), 2, Seite 67-77 volume:25 year:2020 number:2 pages:67-77
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	financial offences misdemeanour offences criminal offences european courts jurisprudence ne bis in idem Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Matić-Bošković Marina @@aut@@ Kostić Jelena @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1760618985
id	DOAJ054664187
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ054664187</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308183627.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ054664187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJfe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HV1-9960</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Matić-Bošković Marina</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences and misdemeanour offences, including administrative penal offences, against the same person for the same acts. Article followed the development in interpretation of the principle by the European Court of Human Rights in Zolotukhin case to the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the EU in Menci case. European Courts jurisprudence could be used for dialogue on challenges that the Serbian judiciary and tax authories are facing in the interpretation of legislation and application of ne bis in idem principle on criminal and misdemeanour proceedings against the same person for the same acts. The articile provides the basis for discussion on the unification of court practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">financial offences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">misdemeanour offences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">criminal offences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">european courts jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ne bis in idem</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kostić Jelena</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2020), 2, Seite 67-77</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760618985</subfield><subfield code="x">26200406</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:67-77</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/fe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2020/0354-88722002067M.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0354-8872</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2620-0406</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">67-77</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	H - Social Science
author	Matić-Bošković Marina
spellingShingle	Matić-Bošković Marina misc HV1-9960 misc financial offences misc misdemeanour offences misc criminal offences misc european courts jurisprudence misc ne bis in idem misc Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts
authorStr	Matić-Bošković Marina
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1760618985
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	HV1-9960
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	26200406
topic_title	HV1-9960 The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts financial offences misdemeanour offences criminal offences european courts jurisprudence ne bis in idem
topic	misc HV1-9960 misc financial offences misc misdemeanour offences misc criminal offences misc european courts jurisprudence misc ne bis in idem misc Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
topic_unstemmed	misc HV1-9960 misc financial offences misc misdemeanour offences misc criminal offences misc european courts jurisprudence misc ne bis in idem misc Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
topic_browse	misc HV1-9960 misc financial offences misc misdemeanour offences misc criminal offences misc european courts jurisprudence misc ne bis in idem misc Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
hierarchy_parent_id	1760618985
hierarchy_top_title	NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1760618985
title	The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ054664187 (DE-599)DOAJfe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445
title_full	The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts
author_sort	Matić-Bošković Marina
journal	NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
journalStr	NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija
callnumber-first-code	H
lang_code	eng srp
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	67
author_browse	Matić-Bošković Marina Kostić Jelena
container_volume	25
class	HV1-9960
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Matić-Bošković Marina
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the european courts
callnumber	HV1-9960
title_auth	The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts
abstract	In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences and misdemeanour offences, including administrative penal offences, against the same person for the same acts. Article followed the development in interpretation of the principle by the European Court of Human Rights in Zolotukhin case to the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the EU in Menci case. European Courts jurisprudence could be used for dialogue on challenges that the Serbian judiciary and tax authories are facing in the interpretation of legislation and application of ne bis in idem principle on criminal and misdemeanour proceedings against the same person for the same acts. The articile provides the basis for discussion on the unification of court practice.
abstractGer	In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences and misdemeanour offences, including administrative penal offences, against the same person for the same acts. Article followed the development in interpretation of the principle by the European Court of Human Rights in Zolotukhin case to the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the EU in Menci case. European Courts jurisprudence could be used for dialogue on challenges that the Serbian judiciary and tax authories are facing in the interpretation of legislation and application of ne bis in idem principle on criminal and misdemeanour proceedings against the same person for the same acts. The articile provides the basis for discussion on the unification of court practice.
abstract_unstemmed	In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences and misdemeanour offences, including administrative penal offences, against the same person for the same acts. Article followed the development in interpretation of the principle by the European Court of Human Rights in Zolotukhin case to the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the EU in Menci case. European Courts jurisprudence could be used for dialogue on challenges that the Serbian judiciary and tax authories are facing in the interpretation of legislation and application of ne bis in idem principle on criminal and misdemeanour proceedings against the same person for the same acts. The articile provides the basis for discussion on the unification of court practice.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753
container_issue	2
title_short	The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts
url	https://doaj.org/article/fe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445 https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2020/0354-88722002067M.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/0354-8872 https://doaj.org/toc/2620-0406
remote_bool	true
author2	Kostić Jelena
author2Str	Kostić Jelena
ppnlink	1760618985
callnumber-subject	HV - Social Pathology, Criminology
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
callnumber-a	HV1-9960
up_date	2024-07-04T00:06:34.827Z
_version_	1803604821104656384
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ054664187</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308183627.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ054664187</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJfe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HV1-9960</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Matić-Bošković Marina</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in idem principle in the practice of the European Court for Human Rights and Court of Justice of the EU and their interpretation of the principle in relation to the application on the criminal offences and misdemeanour offences, including administrative penal offences, against the same person for the same acts. Article followed the development in interpretation of the principle by the European Court of Human Rights in Zolotukhin case to the interpretation of the Court of Justice of the EU in Menci case. European Courts jurisprudence could be used for dialogue on challenges that the Serbian judiciary and tax authories are facing in the interpretation of legislation and application of ne bis in idem principle on criminal and misdemeanour proceedings against the same person for the same acts. The articile provides the basis for discussion on the unification of court practice.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">financial offences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">misdemeanour offences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">criminal offences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">european courts jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">ne bis in idem</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kostić Jelena</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">NBP: Nauka, bezbednost, policija</subfield><subfield code="d">University of Criminal Investigation and Police Studies, Belgrade, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">25(2020), 2, Seite 67-77</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760618985</subfield><subfield code="x">26200406</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:25</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:67-77</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/fe1c6f52f21b4c90812bb42004dc2445</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-8872/2020/0354-88722002067M.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0354-8872</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2620-0406</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">25</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">67-77</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.40042

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

The application of the 'ne bis in idem' related to financial offences in the jurisprudence of the European courts

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?