Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling
The purpose of this commentary is to push the boundaries (real and perceived) of how we think about teacher accountability, education and the purpose of schooling in contemporary times. It takes as a starting point a view that recent changes to the Every Student Succeeds Act does little to shift the...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Jessica Holloway [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Spanisch ; Portugiesisch |
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Education Policy Analysis Archives - Arizona State University, 2003, 28(2020), 0 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:28 ; year:2020 ; number:0 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.14507/epaa.28.5026 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ057130507 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ057130507 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230308210027.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.14507/epaa.28.5026 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ057130507 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a spa |a por | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Jessica Holloway |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The purpose of this commentary is to push the boundaries (real and perceived) of how we think about teacher accountability, education and the purpose of schooling in contemporary times. It takes as a starting point a view that recent changes to the Every Student Succeeds Act does little to shift the underpinning logics of high-stakes teacher accountability that ultimately threaten the stability and adaptability of public schools. Building from this presumption, it explores more universal features of contemporary schooling practices (e.g., standardization, datafication and evaluation) that undermine teacher expertise, autonomy and professional discretion. The purpose is to provide a new lens for thinking about the role of education and to radically disrupt the ‘norms’ we have come to accept as necessary features of modern schooling. Ultimately, it serves as a thought experiment to provide some space for imagining new possibilities and thinking “outside of” the traditional accountability “box”. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a datafication | |
| 650 | 4 | |a teacher expertise | |
| 650 | 4 | |a accountability | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Education | |
| 653 | 0 | |a L | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Education Policy Analysis Archives |d Arizona State University, 2003 |g 28(2020), 0 |w (DE-627)1760649155 |x 10682341 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2020 |g number:0 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5026 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5026 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 28 |j 2020 |e 0 | ||
| author_variant |
j h jh |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:10682341:2020----::eceacutbltdtfctoadvlaincsfr |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2020 |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| allfields |
10.14507/epaa.28.5026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057130507 (DE-599)DOAJ16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por Jessica Holloway verfasserin aut Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The purpose of this commentary is to push the boundaries (real and perceived) of how we think about teacher accountability, education and the purpose of schooling in contemporary times. It takes as a starting point a view that recent changes to the Every Student Succeeds Act does little to shift the underpinning logics of high-stakes teacher accountability that ultimately threaten the stability and adaptability of public schools. Building from this presumption, it explores more universal features of contemporary schooling practices (e.g., standardization, datafication and evaluation) that undermine teacher expertise, autonomy and professional discretion. The purpose is to provide a new lens for thinking about the role of education and to radically disrupt the ‘norms’ we have come to accept as necessary features of modern schooling. Ultimately, it serves as a thought experiment to provide some space for imagining new possibilities and thinking “outside of” the traditional accountability “box”. datafication teacher expertise accountability Education L In Education Policy Analysis Archives Arizona State University, 2003 28(2020), 0 (DE-627)1760649155 10682341 nnns volume:28 year:2020 number:0 https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 kostenfrei https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 28 2020 0 |
| spelling |
10.14507/epaa.28.5026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057130507 (DE-599)DOAJ16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por Jessica Holloway verfasserin aut Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The purpose of this commentary is to push the boundaries (real and perceived) of how we think about teacher accountability, education and the purpose of schooling in contemporary times. It takes as a starting point a view that recent changes to the Every Student Succeeds Act does little to shift the underpinning logics of high-stakes teacher accountability that ultimately threaten the stability and adaptability of public schools. Building from this presumption, it explores more universal features of contemporary schooling practices (e.g., standardization, datafication and evaluation) that undermine teacher expertise, autonomy and professional discretion. The purpose is to provide a new lens for thinking about the role of education and to radically disrupt the ‘norms’ we have come to accept as necessary features of modern schooling. Ultimately, it serves as a thought experiment to provide some space for imagining new possibilities and thinking “outside of” the traditional accountability “box”. datafication teacher expertise accountability Education L In Education Policy Analysis Archives Arizona State University, 2003 28(2020), 0 (DE-627)1760649155 10682341 nnns volume:28 year:2020 number:0 https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 kostenfrei https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 28 2020 0 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.14507/epaa.28.5026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057130507 (DE-599)DOAJ16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por Jessica Holloway verfasserin aut Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The purpose of this commentary is to push the boundaries (real and perceived) of how we think about teacher accountability, education and the purpose of schooling in contemporary times. It takes as a starting point a view that recent changes to the Every Student Succeeds Act does little to shift the underpinning logics of high-stakes teacher accountability that ultimately threaten the stability and adaptability of public schools. Building from this presumption, it explores more universal features of contemporary schooling practices (e.g., standardization, datafication and evaluation) that undermine teacher expertise, autonomy and professional discretion. The purpose is to provide a new lens for thinking about the role of education and to radically disrupt the ‘norms’ we have come to accept as necessary features of modern schooling. Ultimately, it serves as a thought experiment to provide some space for imagining new possibilities and thinking “outside of” the traditional accountability “box”. datafication teacher expertise accountability Education L In Education Policy Analysis Archives Arizona State University, 2003 28(2020), 0 (DE-627)1760649155 10682341 nnns volume:28 year:2020 number:0 https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 kostenfrei https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 28 2020 0 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.14507/epaa.28.5026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057130507 (DE-599)DOAJ16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por Jessica Holloway verfasserin aut Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The purpose of this commentary is to push the boundaries (real and perceived) of how we think about teacher accountability, education and the purpose of schooling in contemporary times. It takes as a starting point a view that recent changes to the Every Student Succeeds Act does little to shift the underpinning logics of high-stakes teacher accountability that ultimately threaten the stability and adaptability of public schools. Building from this presumption, it explores more universal features of contemporary schooling practices (e.g., standardization, datafication and evaluation) that undermine teacher expertise, autonomy and professional discretion. The purpose is to provide a new lens for thinking about the role of education and to radically disrupt the ‘norms’ we have come to accept as necessary features of modern schooling. Ultimately, it serves as a thought experiment to provide some space for imagining new possibilities and thinking “outside of” the traditional accountability “box”. datafication teacher expertise accountability Education L In Education Policy Analysis Archives Arizona State University, 2003 28(2020), 0 (DE-627)1760649155 10682341 nnns volume:28 year:2020 number:0 https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 kostenfrei https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 28 2020 0 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.14507/epaa.28.5026 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057130507 (DE-599)DOAJ16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por Jessica Holloway verfasserin aut Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The purpose of this commentary is to push the boundaries (real and perceived) of how we think about teacher accountability, education and the purpose of schooling in contemporary times. It takes as a starting point a view that recent changes to the Every Student Succeeds Act does little to shift the underpinning logics of high-stakes teacher accountability that ultimately threaten the stability and adaptability of public schools. Building from this presumption, it explores more universal features of contemporary schooling practices (e.g., standardization, datafication and evaluation) that undermine teacher expertise, autonomy and professional discretion. The purpose is to provide a new lens for thinking about the role of education and to radically disrupt the ‘norms’ we have come to accept as necessary features of modern schooling. Ultimately, it serves as a thought experiment to provide some space for imagining new possibilities and thinking “outside of” the traditional accountability “box”. datafication teacher expertise accountability Education L In Education Policy Analysis Archives Arizona State University, 2003 28(2020), 0 (DE-627)1760649155 10682341 nnns volume:28 year:2020 number:0 https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 kostenfrei https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5026 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 28 2020 0 |
| language |
English Spanish Portuguese |
| source |
In Education Policy Analysis Archives 28(2020), 0 volume:28 year:2020 number:0 |
| sourceStr |
In Education Policy Analysis Archives 28(2020), 0 volume:28 year:2020 number:0 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
datafication teacher expertise accountability Education L |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Education Policy Analysis Archives |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jessica Holloway @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760649155 |
| id |
DOAJ057130507 |
| language_de |
englisch spanisch portugiesisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ057130507</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308210027.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.14507/epaa.28.5026</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ057130507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jessica Holloway</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The purpose of this commentary is to push the boundaries (real and perceived) of how we think about teacher accountability, education and the purpose of schooling in contemporary times. It takes as a starting point a view that recent changes to the Every Student Succeeds Act does little to shift the underpinning logics of high-stakes teacher accountability that ultimately threaten the stability and adaptability of public schools. Building from this presumption, it explores more universal features of contemporary schooling practices (e.g., standardization, datafication and evaluation) that undermine teacher expertise, autonomy and professional discretion. The purpose is to provide a new lens for thinking about the role of education and to radically disrupt the ‘norms’ we have come to accept as necessary features of modern schooling. Ultimately, it serves as a thought experiment to provide some space for imagining new possibilities and thinking “outside of” the traditional accountability “box”.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">datafication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">teacher expertise</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">accountability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Education Policy Analysis Archives</subfield><subfield code="d">Arizona State University, 2003</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2020), 0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760649155</subfield><subfield code="x">10682341</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5026</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5026</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Jessica Holloway |
| spellingShingle |
Jessica Holloway misc datafication misc teacher expertise misc accountability misc Education misc L Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling |
| authorStr |
Jessica Holloway |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760649155 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
10682341 |
| topic_title |
Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling datafication teacher expertise accountability |
| topic |
misc datafication misc teacher expertise misc accountability misc Education misc L |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc datafication misc teacher expertise misc accountability misc Education misc L |
| topic_browse |
misc datafication misc teacher expertise misc accountability misc Education misc L |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Education Policy Analysis Archives |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760649155 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Education Policy Analysis Archives |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760649155 |
| title |
Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ057130507 (DE-599)DOAJ16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 |
| title_full |
Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling |
| author_sort |
Jessica Holloway |
| journal |
Education Policy Analysis Archives |
| journalStr |
Education Policy Analysis Archives |
| lang_code |
eng spa por |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2020 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Jessica Holloway |
| container_volume |
28 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Jessica Holloway |
| doi_str_mv |
10.14507/epaa.28.5026 |
| title_sort |
teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: a case for reimagining schooling |
| title_auth |
Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling |
| abstract |
The purpose of this commentary is to push the boundaries (real and perceived) of how we think about teacher accountability, education and the purpose of schooling in contemporary times. It takes as a starting point a view that recent changes to the Every Student Succeeds Act does little to shift the underpinning logics of high-stakes teacher accountability that ultimately threaten the stability and adaptability of public schools. Building from this presumption, it explores more universal features of contemporary schooling practices (e.g., standardization, datafication and evaluation) that undermine teacher expertise, autonomy and professional discretion. The purpose is to provide a new lens for thinking about the role of education and to radically disrupt the ‘norms’ we have come to accept as necessary features of modern schooling. Ultimately, it serves as a thought experiment to provide some space for imagining new possibilities and thinking “outside of” the traditional accountability “box”. |
| abstractGer |
The purpose of this commentary is to push the boundaries (real and perceived) of how we think about teacher accountability, education and the purpose of schooling in contemporary times. It takes as a starting point a view that recent changes to the Every Student Succeeds Act does little to shift the underpinning logics of high-stakes teacher accountability that ultimately threaten the stability and adaptability of public schools. Building from this presumption, it explores more universal features of contemporary schooling practices (e.g., standardization, datafication and evaluation) that undermine teacher expertise, autonomy and professional discretion. The purpose is to provide a new lens for thinking about the role of education and to radically disrupt the ‘norms’ we have come to accept as necessary features of modern schooling. Ultimately, it serves as a thought experiment to provide some space for imagining new possibilities and thinking “outside of” the traditional accountability “box”. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The purpose of this commentary is to push the boundaries (real and perceived) of how we think about teacher accountability, education and the purpose of schooling in contemporary times. It takes as a starting point a view that recent changes to the Every Student Succeeds Act does little to shift the underpinning logics of high-stakes teacher accountability that ultimately threaten the stability and adaptability of public schools. Building from this presumption, it explores more universal features of contemporary schooling practices (e.g., standardization, datafication and evaluation) that undermine teacher expertise, autonomy and professional discretion. The purpose is to provide a new lens for thinking about the role of education and to radically disrupt the ‘norms’ we have come to accept as necessary features of modern schooling. Ultimately, it serves as a thought experiment to provide some space for imagining new possibilities and thinking “outside of” the traditional accountability “box”. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
0 |
| title_short |
Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5026 https://doaj.org/article/16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083 https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5026 https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760649155 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.14507/epaa.28.5026 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T00:26:34.227Z |
| _version_ |
1803606078762516480 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ057130507</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308210027.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.14507/epaa.28.5026</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ057130507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jessica Holloway</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Teacher accountability, datafication and evaluation: A case for reimagining schooling</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The purpose of this commentary is to push the boundaries (real and perceived) of how we think about teacher accountability, education and the purpose of schooling in contemporary times. It takes as a starting point a view that recent changes to the Every Student Succeeds Act does little to shift the underpinning logics of high-stakes teacher accountability that ultimately threaten the stability and adaptability of public schools. Building from this presumption, it explores more universal features of contemporary schooling practices (e.g., standardization, datafication and evaluation) that undermine teacher expertise, autonomy and professional discretion. The purpose is to provide a new lens for thinking about the role of education and to radically disrupt the ‘norms’ we have come to accept as necessary features of modern schooling. Ultimately, it serves as a thought experiment to provide some space for imagining new possibilities and thinking “outside of” the traditional accountability “box”.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">datafication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">teacher expertise</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">accountability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Education Policy Analysis Archives</subfield><subfield code="d">Arizona State University, 2003</subfield><subfield code="g">28(2020), 0</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760649155</subfield><subfield code="x">10682341</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:28</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5026</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/16b4ab1fd44b48d0a4afd0aa3f5fd083</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5026</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">28</subfield><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">0</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4013557 |