Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.)

Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) is a cruciferous plant. As an oilseed crop camelina is mainly grown for oil production. After the 1960s, however, the cultivation has become less important. Only in recent years, interest in this culture was awakened in the search for new sources of omega 3 fatt...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Scheliga, Maria [verfasserIn] Petersen, Jan [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Deutsch ; Englisch

Erschienen:	2016

Schlagwörter:	herbicide strategy herbicide selectivity metazachlor oilseed crop

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Julius-Kühn-Archiv - Julius Kühn-Institut, 2013, (2016), 452, Seite 154-162
Übergeordnetes Werk:	year:2016 ; number:452 ; pages:154-162

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.5073/jka.2016.452.020

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ057242933

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ057242933
003	DE-627
005	20230501183538.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|ger c
024	7		\|a 10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ057242933
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a ger \|a eng
050		0	\|a QK1-989
100	0		\|a Scheliga, Maria \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.)
264		1	\|c 2016
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) is a cruciferous plant. As an oilseed crop camelina is mainly grown for oil production. After the 1960s, however, the cultivation has become less important. Only in recent years, interest in this culture was awakened in the search for new sources of omega 3 fatty acids, natural antioxidants and a potential crop for the production of biofuels. The use of camelina oil for different purposes within the framework of the material use of renewable raw materials is of particular interest due to the high levels of linoleic and linolenic acid. For the establishment of camelina as a crop in agricultural crop rotation systems weed control should not be disregarded despite the rather good competitive ability against weeds. Based on greenhouse experiments a field trial in 2015 with different herbicide strategies was carried out. Besides Butisan Top (metazachlor + quinmerac), Devrinol FL (napropamide) and Stomp Aqua (pendimethalin) and also Betasana SC (phenmedipham) has been tested in various amounts and combinations. Using assessments to weed density and herbicide tolerance different herbicide strategies were compared with each other. Though, it is difficult to find a compromise between satisfactory herbicidal effect and a slight injury to the crop plant. The herbicide selection, the application rate and the combination of different herbicides have an effect on the crop. To confirm the data obtained further tests are necessary.
650		4	\|a herbicide strategy
650		4	\|a herbicide selectivity
650		4	\|a metazachlor
650		4	\|a oilseed crop
653		0	\|a Agriculture
653		0	\|a S
653		0	\|a Botany
700	0		\|a Petersen, Jan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Julius-Kühn-Archiv \|d Julius Kühn-Institut, 2013 \|g (2016), 452, Seite 154-162 \|w (DE-627)618327355 \|w (DE-600)2537684-6 \|x 2199921X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g year:2016 \|g number:452 \|g pages:154-162
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/6159/5843 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_235
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2018
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|j 2016 \|e 452 \|h 154-162

Indexfelder

author_variant	m s ms j p jp
matchkey_str	article:2199921X:2016----::eetvtohriieicmlncml
hierarchy_sort_str	2016
callnumber-subject-code	QK
publishDate	2016
allfields	10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057242933 (DE-599)DOAJ79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng QK1-989 Scheliga, Maria verfasserin aut Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) is a cruciferous plant. As an oilseed crop camelina is mainly grown for oil production. After the 1960s, however, the cultivation has become less important. Only in recent years, interest in this culture was awakened in the search for new sources of omega 3 fatty acids, natural antioxidants and a potential crop for the production of biofuels. The use of camelina oil for different purposes within the framework of the material use of renewable raw materials is of particular interest due to the high levels of linoleic and linolenic acid. For the establishment of camelina as a crop in agricultural crop rotation systems weed control should not be disregarded despite the rather good competitive ability against weeds. Based on greenhouse experiments a field trial in 2015 with different herbicide strategies was carried out. Besides Butisan Top (metazachlor + quinmerac), Devrinol FL (napropamide) and Stomp Aqua (pendimethalin) and also Betasana SC (phenmedipham) has been tested in various amounts and combinations. Using assessments to weed density and herbicide tolerance different herbicide strategies were compared with each other. Though, it is difficult to find a compromise between satisfactory herbicidal effect and a slight injury to the crop plant. The herbicide selection, the application rate and the combination of different herbicides have an effect on the crop. To confirm the data obtained further tests are necessary. herbicide strategy herbicide selectivity metazachlor oilseed crop Agriculture S Botany Petersen, Jan verfasserin aut In Julius-Kühn-Archiv Julius Kühn-Institut, 2013 (2016), 452, Seite 154-162 (DE-627)618327355 (DE-600)2537684-6 2199921X nnns year:2016 number:452 pages:154-162 https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374 kostenfrei http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/6159/5843 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_235 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2016 452 154-162
spelling	10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057242933 (DE-599)DOAJ79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng QK1-989 Scheliga, Maria verfasserin aut Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) is a cruciferous plant. As an oilseed crop camelina is mainly grown for oil production. After the 1960s, however, the cultivation has become less important. Only in recent years, interest in this culture was awakened in the search for new sources of omega 3 fatty acids, natural antioxidants and a potential crop for the production of biofuels. The use of camelina oil for different purposes within the framework of the material use of renewable raw materials is of particular interest due to the high levels of linoleic and linolenic acid. For the establishment of camelina as a crop in agricultural crop rotation systems weed control should not be disregarded despite the rather good competitive ability against weeds. Based on greenhouse experiments a field trial in 2015 with different herbicide strategies was carried out. Besides Butisan Top (metazachlor + quinmerac), Devrinol FL (napropamide) and Stomp Aqua (pendimethalin) and also Betasana SC (phenmedipham) has been tested in various amounts and combinations. Using assessments to weed density and herbicide tolerance different herbicide strategies were compared with each other. Though, it is difficult to find a compromise between satisfactory herbicidal effect and a slight injury to the crop plant. The herbicide selection, the application rate and the combination of different herbicides have an effect on the crop. To confirm the data obtained further tests are necessary. herbicide strategy herbicide selectivity metazachlor oilseed crop Agriculture S Botany Petersen, Jan verfasserin aut In Julius-Kühn-Archiv Julius Kühn-Institut, 2013 (2016), 452, Seite 154-162 (DE-627)618327355 (DE-600)2537684-6 2199921X nnns year:2016 number:452 pages:154-162 https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374 kostenfrei http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/6159/5843 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_235 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2016 452 154-162
allfields_unstemmed	10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057242933 (DE-599)DOAJ79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng QK1-989 Scheliga, Maria verfasserin aut Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) is a cruciferous plant. As an oilseed crop camelina is mainly grown for oil production. After the 1960s, however, the cultivation has become less important. Only in recent years, interest in this culture was awakened in the search for new sources of omega 3 fatty acids, natural antioxidants and a potential crop for the production of biofuels. The use of camelina oil for different purposes within the framework of the material use of renewable raw materials is of particular interest due to the high levels of linoleic and linolenic acid. For the establishment of camelina as a crop in agricultural crop rotation systems weed control should not be disregarded despite the rather good competitive ability against weeds. Based on greenhouse experiments a field trial in 2015 with different herbicide strategies was carried out. Besides Butisan Top (metazachlor + quinmerac), Devrinol FL (napropamide) and Stomp Aqua (pendimethalin) and also Betasana SC (phenmedipham) has been tested in various amounts and combinations. Using assessments to weed density and herbicide tolerance different herbicide strategies were compared with each other. Though, it is difficult to find a compromise between satisfactory herbicidal effect and a slight injury to the crop plant. The herbicide selection, the application rate and the combination of different herbicides have an effect on the crop. To confirm the data obtained further tests are necessary. herbicide strategy herbicide selectivity metazachlor oilseed crop Agriculture S Botany Petersen, Jan verfasserin aut In Julius-Kühn-Archiv Julius Kühn-Institut, 2013 (2016), 452, Seite 154-162 (DE-627)618327355 (DE-600)2537684-6 2199921X nnns year:2016 number:452 pages:154-162 https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374 kostenfrei http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/6159/5843 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_235 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2016 452 154-162
allfieldsGer	10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057242933 (DE-599)DOAJ79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng QK1-989 Scheliga, Maria verfasserin aut Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) is a cruciferous plant. As an oilseed crop camelina is mainly grown for oil production. After the 1960s, however, the cultivation has become less important. Only in recent years, interest in this culture was awakened in the search for new sources of omega 3 fatty acids, natural antioxidants and a potential crop for the production of biofuels. The use of camelina oil for different purposes within the framework of the material use of renewable raw materials is of particular interest due to the high levels of linoleic and linolenic acid. For the establishment of camelina as a crop in agricultural crop rotation systems weed control should not be disregarded despite the rather good competitive ability against weeds. Based on greenhouse experiments a field trial in 2015 with different herbicide strategies was carried out. Besides Butisan Top (metazachlor + quinmerac), Devrinol FL (napropamide) and Stomp Aqua (pendimethalin) and also Betasana SC (phenmedipham) has been tested in various amounts and combinations. Using assessments to weed density and herbicide tolerance different herbicide strategies were compared with each other. Though, it is difficult to find a compromise between satisfactory herbicidal effect and a slight injury to the crop plant. The herbicide selection, the application rate and the combination of different herbicides have an effect on the crop. To confirm the data obtained further tests are necessary. herbicide strategy herbicide selectivity metazachlor oilseed crop Agriculture S Botany Petersen, Jan verfasserin aut In Julius-Kühn-Archiv Julius Kühn-Institut, 2013 (2016), 452, Seite 154-162 (DE-627)618327355 (DE-600)2537684-6 2199921X nnns year:2016 number:452 pages:154-162 https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374 kostenfrei http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/6159/5843 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_235 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2016 452 154-162
allfieldsSound	10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057242933 (DE-599)DOAJ79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ger eng QK1-989 Scheliga, Maria verfasserin aut Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) is a cruciferous plant. As an oilseed crop camelina is mainly grown for oil production. After the 1960s, however, the cultivation has become less important. Only in recent years, interest in this culture was awakened in the search for new sources of omega 3 fatty acids, natural antioxidants and a potential crop for the production of biofuels. The use of camelina oil for different purposes within the framework of the material use of renewable raw materials is of particular interest due to the high levels of linoleic and linolenic acid. For the establishment of camelina as a crop in agricultural crop rotation systems weed control should not be disregarded despite the rather good competitive ability against weeds. Based on greenhouse experiments a field trial in 2015 with different herbicide strategies was carried out. Besides Butisan Top (metazachlor + quinmerac), Devrinol FL (napropamide) and Stomp Aqua (pendimethalin) and also Betasana SC (phenmedipham) has been tested in various amounts and combinations. Using assessments to weed density and herbicide tolerance different herbicide strategies were compared with each other. Though, it is difficult to find a compromise between satisfactory herbicidal effect and a slight injury to the crop plant. The herbicide selection, the application rate and the combination of different herbicides have an effect on the crop. To confirm the data obtained further tests are necessary. herbicide strategy herbicide selectivity metazachlor oilseed crop Agriculture S Botany Petersen, Jan verfasserin aut In Julius-Kühn-Archiv Julius Kühn-Institut, 2013 (2016), 452, Seite 154-162 (DE-627)618327355 (DE-600)2537684-6 2199921X nnns year:2016 number:452 pages:154-162 https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374 kostenfrei http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/6159/5843 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_235 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2016 452 154-162
language	German English
source	In Julius-Kühn-Archiv (2016), 452, Seite 154-162 year:2016 number:452 pages:154-162
sourceStr	In Julius-Kühn-Archiv (2016), 452, Seite 154-162 year:2016 number:452 pages:154-162
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	herbicide strategy herbicide selectivity metazachlor oilseed crop Agriculture S Botany
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Julius-Kühn-Archiv
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Scheliga, Maria @@aut@@ Petersen, Jan @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	618327355
id	DOAJ057242933
language_de	deutsch englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ057242933</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230501183538.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|ger c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5073/jka.2016.452.020</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ057242933</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QK1-989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scheliga, Maria</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) is a cruciferous plant. As an oilseed crop camelina is mainly grown for oil production. After the 1960s, however, the cultivation has become less important. Only in recent years, interest in this culture was awakened in the search for new sources of omega 3 fatty acids, natural antioxidants and a potential crop for the production of biofuels. The use of camelina oil for different purposes within the framework of the material use of renewable raw materials is of particular interest due to the high levels of linoleic and linolenic acid. For the establishment of camelina as a crop in agricultural crop rotation systems weed control should not be disregarded despite the rather good competitive ability against weeds. Based on greenhouse experiments a field trial in 2015 with different herbicide strategies was carried out. Besides Butisan Top (metazachlor + quinmerac), Devrinol FL (napropamide) and Stomp Aqua (pendimethalin) and also Betasana SC (phenmedipham) has been tested in various amounts and combinations. Using assessments to weed density and herbicide tolerance different herbicide strategies were compared with each other. Though, it is difficult to find a compromise between satisfactory herbicidal effect and a slight injury to the crop plant. The herbicide selection, the application rate and the combination of different herbicides have an effect on the crop. To confirm the data obtained further tests are necessary.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">herbicide strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">herbicide selectivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">metazachlor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oilseed crop</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Botany</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Petersen, Jan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Julius-Kühn-Archiv</subfield><subfield code="d">Julius Kühn-Institut, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">(2016), 452, Seite 154-162</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)618327355</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2537684-6</subfield><subfield code="x">2199921X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:452</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:154-162</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2016.452.020</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/6159/5843</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_235</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">452</subfield><subfield code="h">154-162</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	Q - Science
author	Scheliga, Maria
spellingShingle	Scheliga, Maria misc QK1-989 misc herbicide strategy misc herbicide selectivity misc metazachlor misc oilseed crop misc Agriculture misc S misc Botany Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.)
authorStr	Scheliga, Maria
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)618327355
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	QK1-989
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2199921X
topic_title	QK1-989 Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) herbicide strategy herbicide selectivity metazachlor oilseed crop
topic	misc QK1-989 misc herbicide strategy misc herbicide selectivity misc metazachlor misc oilseed crop misc Agriculture misc S misc Botany
topic_unstemmed	misc QK1-989 misc herbicide strategy misc herbicide selectivity misc metazachlor misc oilseed crop misc Agriculture misc S misc Botany
topic_browse	misc QK1-989 misc herbicide strategy misc herbicide selectivity misc metazachlor misc oilseed crop misc Agriculture misc S misc Botany
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Julius-Kühn-Archiv
hierarchy_parent_id	618327355
hierarchy_top_title	Julius-Kühn-Archiv
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)618327355 (DE-600)2537684-6
title	Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.)
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ057242933 (DE-599)DOAJ79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374
title_full	Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.)
author_sort	Scheliga, Maria
journal	Julius-Kühn-Archiv
journalStr	Julius-Kühn-Archiv
callnumber-first-code	Q
lang_code	ger eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2016
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	154
author_browse	Scheliga, Maria Petersen, Jan
class	QK1-989
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Scheliga, Maria
doi_str_mv	10.5073/jka.2016.452.020
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	selectivity of herbicides in camelina (camelina sativa (l.) crtz.)
callnumber	QK1-989
title_auth	Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.)
abstract	Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) is a cruciferous plant. As an oilseed crop camelina is mainly grown for oil production. After the 1960s, however, the cultivation has become less important. Only in recent years, interest in this culture was awakened in the search for new sources of omega 3 fatty acids, natural antioxidants and a potential crop for the production of biofuels. The use of camelina oil for different purposes within the framework of the material use of renewable raw materials is of particular interest due to the high levels of linoleic and linolenic acid. For the establishment of camelina as a crop in agricultural crop rotation systems weed control should not be disregarded despite the rather good competitive ability against weeds. Based on greenhouse experiments a field trial in 2015 with different herbicide strategies was carried out. Besides Butisan Top (metazachlor + quinmerac), Devrinol FL (napropamide) and Stomp Aqua (pendimethalin) and also Betasana SC (phenmedipham) has been tested in various amounts and combinations. Using assessments to weed density and herbicide tolerance different herbicide strategies were compared with each other. Though, it is difficult to find a compromise between satisfactory herbicidal effect and a slight injury to the crop plant. The herbicide selection, the application rate and the combination of different herbicides have an effect on the crop. To confirm the data obtained further tests are necessary.
abstractGer	Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) is a cruciferous plant. As an oilseed crop camelina is mainly grown for oil production. After the 1960s, however, the cultivation has become less important. Only in recent years, interest in this culture was awakened in the search for new sources of omega 3 fatty acids, natural antioxidants and a potential crop for the production of biofuels. The use of camelina oil for different purposes within the framework of the material use of renewable raw materials is of particular interest due to the high levels of linoleic and linolenic acid. For the establishment of camelina as a crop in agricultural crop rotation systems weed control should not be disregarded despite the rather good competitive ability against weeds. Based on greenhouse experiments a field trial in 2015 with different herbicide strategies was carried out. Besides Butisan Top (metazachlor + quinmerac), Devrinol FL (napropamide) and Stomp Aqua (pendimethalin) and also Betasana SC (phenmedipham) has been tested in various amounts and combinations. Using assessments to weed density and herbicide tolerance different herbicide strategies were compared with each other. Though, it is difficult to find a compromise between satisfactory herbicidal effect and a slight injury to the crop plant. The herbicide selection, the application rate and the combination of different herbicides have an effect on the crop. To confirm the data obtained further tests are necessary.
abstract_unstemmed	Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) is a cruciferous plant. As an oilseed crop camelina is mainly grown for oil production. After the 1960s, however, the cultivation has become less important. Only in recent years, interest in this culture was awakened in the search for new sources of omega 3 fatty acids, natural antioxidants and a potential crop for the production of biofuels. The use of camelina oil for different purposes within the framework of the material use of renewable raw materials is of particular interest due to the high levels of linoleic and linolenic acid. For the establishment of camelina as a crop in agricultural crop rotation systems weed control should not be disregarded despite the rather good competitive ability against weeds. Based on greenhouse experiments a field trial in 2015 with different herbicide strategies was carried out. Besides Butisan Top (metazachlor + quinmerac), Devrinol FL (napropamide) and Stomp Aqua (pendimethalin) and also Betasana SC (phenmedipham) has been tested in various amounts and combinations. Using assessments to weed density and herbicide tolerance different herbicide strategies were compared with each other. Though, it is difficult to find a compromise between satisfactory herbicidal effect and a slight injury to the crop plant. The herbicide selection, the application rate and the combination of different herbicides have an effect on the crop. To confirm the data obtained further tests are necessary.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_235 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2018 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	452
title_short	Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.)
url	https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2016.452.020 https://doaj.org/article/79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374 http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/6159/5843 https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892
remote_bool	true
author2	Petersen, Jan
author2Str	Petersen, Jan
ppnlink	618327355
callnumber-subject	QK - Botany
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.5073/jka.2016.452.020
callnumber-a	QK1-989
up_date	2024-07-04T00:53:43.725Z
_version_	1803607787413962752
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ057242933</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230501183538.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2016 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|ger c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5073/jka.2016.452.020</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ057242933</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ger</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QK1-989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scheliga, Maria</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.) is a cruciferous plant. As an oilseed crop camelina is mainly grown for oil production. After the 1960s, however, the cultivation has become less important. Only in recent years, interest in this culture was awakened in the search for new sources of omega 3 fatty acids, natural antioxidants and a potential crop for the production of biofuels. The use of camelina oil for different purposes within the framework of the material use of renewable raw materials is of particular interest due to the high levels of linoleic and linolenic acid. For the establishment of camelina as a crop in agricultural crop rotation systems weed control should not be disregarded despite the rather good competitive ability against weeds. Based on greenhouse experiments a field trial in 2015 with different herbicide strategies was carried out. Besides Butisan Top (metazachlor + quinmerac), Devrinol FL (napropamide) and Stomp Aqua (pendimethalin) and also Betasana SC (phenmedipham) has been tested in various amounts and combinations. Using assessments to weed density and herbicide tolerance different herbicide strategies were compared with each other. Though, it is difficult to find a compromise between satisfactory herbicidal effect and a slight injury to the crop plant. The herbicide selection, the application rate and the combination of different herbicides have an effect on the crop. To confirm the data obtained further tests are necessary.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">herbicide strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">herbicide selectivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">metazachlor</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oilseed crop</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Botany</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Petersen, Jan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Julius-Kühn-Archiv</subfield><subfield code="d">Julius Kühn-Institut, 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">(2016), 452, Seite 154-162</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)618327355</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2537684-6</subfield><subfield code="x">2199921X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:452</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:154-162</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2016.452.020</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/79ca703388f14ba8a04ba5438b1f8374</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://pub.jki.bund.de/index.php/JKA/article/view/6159/5843</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1868-9892</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_235</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">452</subfield><subfield code="h">154-162</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4019136

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Selectivity of herbicides in Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crtz.)

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?