Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i<

Wine has been produced in Georgia since the 6th millennium BC. The processes of cultivar selection and breeding started with wild grapes <i<Vitis vinifera</i< L. ssp. <i<sylvestris</i< Gmel. and included multiple introgression events—from the wild to domestication. This artic...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	David Maghradze [verfasserIn] Shengeli Kikilashvili [verfasserIn] Olan Gotsiridze [verfasserIn] Tamar Maghradze [verfasserIn] Daniela Fracassetti [verfasserIn] Osvaldo Failla [verfasserIn] Laura Rustioni [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	wild grapes Caucasus Neolithic wines genetic resources grapevine domestication viticulture

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Agronomy - MDPI AG, 2012, 11(2021), 3, p 472
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:11 ; year:2021 ; number:3, p 472

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/agronomy11030472

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ057608482

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ057608482
003	DE-627
005	20240414082757.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/agronomy11030472 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ057608482
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a David Maghradze \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i<
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Wine has been produced in Georgia since the 6th millennium BC. The processes of cultivar selection and breeding started with wild grapes <i<Vitis vinifera</i< L. ssp. <i<sylvestris</i< Gmel. and included multiple introgression events—from the wild to domestication. This article aims at improving the knowledge concerning the history of winemaking through a comparison of the <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and subsp. <i<sativa</i<. Grapes of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< were grown in an ampelographic collection and vintages 2017–2020 were analyzed. The obtained data were compared to a wider dataset available in literature concerning <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sativa</i<, demonstrating the central role of grape morphology in the domestication process. This evidence suggests that the technological value of the cultivars played an important role in the selection process. In vintages 2017, 2018, and 2019, wines were produced with <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< grapes and compared with Cabernet Sauvignon and Saperavi vinifications. For all the vintages, the fermentations took shorter time for wild grape, despite the highest content of total phenols. Learning from the past, <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< might still be an interesting genetic resource for future breeding programs. Furthermore, the possible combination of wild and domesticated grapes can make possible the production of wines with long ageing, exalting their own characteristics.
650		4	\|a wild grapes
650		4	\|a Caucasus
650		4	\|a Neolithic wines
650		4	\|a genetic resources
650		4	\|a grapevine domestication
650		4	\|a viticulture
653		0	\|a Agriculture
653		0	\|a S
700	0		\|a Shengeli Kikilashvili \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Olan Gotsiridze \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Tamar Maghradze \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Daniela Fracassetti \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Osvaldo Failla \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Laura Rustioni \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Agronomy \|d MDPI AG, 2012 \|g 11(2021), 3, p 472 \|w (DE-627)658000543 \|w (DE-600)2607043-1 \|x 20734395 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:11 \|g year:2021 \|g number:3, p 472
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030472 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/3/472 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 11 \|j 2021 \|e 3, p 472

Indexfelder

author_variant	d m dm s k sk o g og t m tm d f df o f of l r lr
matchkey_str	article:20734395:2021----::oprsneweterptcnlgclhrceitcoiiivnfrius
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
publishDate	2021
allfields	10.3390/agronomy11030472 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057608482 (DE-599)DOAJ9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng David Maghradze verfasserin aut Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i< 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Wine has been produced in Georgia since the 6th millennium BC. The processes of cultivar selection and breeding started with wild grapes <i<Vitis vinifera</i< L. ssp. <i<sylvestris</i< Gmel. and included multiple introgression events—from the wild to domestication. This article aims at improving the knowledge concerning the history of winemaking through a comparison of the <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and subsp. <i<sativa</i<. Grapes of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< were grown in an ampelographic collection and vintages 2017–2020 were analyzed. The obtained data were compared to a wider dataset available in literature concerning <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sativa</i<, demonstrating the central role of grape morphology in the domestication process. This evidence suggests that the technological value of the cultivars played an important role in the selection process. In vintages 2017, 2018, and 2019, wines were produced with <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< grapes and compared with Cabernet Sauvignon and Saperavi vinifications. For all the vintages, the fermentations took shorter time for wild grape, despite the highest content of total phenols. Learning from the past, <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< might still be an interesting genetic resource for future breeding programs. Furthermore, the possible combination of wild and domesticated grapes can make possible the production of wines with long ageing, exalting their own characteristics. wild grapes Caucasus Neolithic wines genetic resources grapevine domestication viticulture Agriculture S Shengeli Kikilashvili verfasserin aut Olan Gotsiridze verfasserin aut Tamar Maghradze verfasserin aut Daniela Fracassetti verfasserin aut Osvaldo Failla verfasserin aut Laura Rustioni verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 11(2021), 3, p 472 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:3, p 472 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030472 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/3/472 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 3, p 472
spelling	10.3390/agronomy11030472 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057608482 (DE-599)DOAJ9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng David Maghradze verfasserin aut Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i< 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Wine has been produced in Georgia since the 6th millennium BC. The processes of cultivar selection and breeding started with wild grapes <i<Vitis vinifera</i< L. ssp. <i<sylvestris</i< Gmel. and included multiple introgression events—from the wild to domestication. This article aims at improving the knowledge concerning the history of winemaking through a comparison of the <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and subsp. <i<sativa</i<. Grapes of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< were grown in an ampelographic collection and vintages 2017–2020 were analyzed. The obtained data were compared to a wider dataset available in literature concerning <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sativa</i<, demonstrating the central role of grape morphology in the domestication process. This evidence suggests that the technological value of the cultivars played an important role in the selection process. In vintages 2017, 2018, and 2019, wines were produced with <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< grapes and compared with Cabernet Sauvignon and Saperavi vinifications. For all the vintages, the fermentations took shorter time for wild grape, despite the highest content of total phenols. Learning from the past, <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< might still be an interesting genetic resource for future breeding programs. Furthermore, the possible combination of wild and domesticated grapes can make possible the production of wines with long ageing, exalting their own characteristics. wild grapes Caucasus Neolithic wines genetic resources grapevine domestication viticulture Agriculture S Shengeli Kikilashvili verfasserin aut Olan Gotsiridze verfasserin aut Tamar Maghradze verfasserin aut Daniela Fracassetti verfasserin aut Osvaldo Failla verfasserin aut Laura Rustioni verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 11(2021), 3, p 472 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:3, p 472 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030472 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/3/472 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 3, p 472
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/agronomy11030472 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057608482 (DE-599)DOAJ9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng David Maghradze verfasserin aut Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i< 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Wine has been produced in Georgia since the 6th millennium BC. The processes of cultivar selection and breeding started with wild grapes <i<Vitis vinifera</i< L. ssp. <i<sylvestris</i< Gmel. and included multiple introgression events—from the wild to domestication. This article aims at improving the knowledge concerning the history of winemaking through a comparison of the <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and subsp. <i<sativa</i<. Grapes of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< were grown in an ampelographic collection and vintages 2017–2020 were analyzed. The obtained data were compared to a wider dataset available in literature concerning <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sativa</i<, demonstrating the central role of grape morphology in the domestication process. This evidence suggests that the technological value of the cultivars played an important role in the selection process. In vintages 2017, 2018, and 2019, wines were produced with <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< grapes and compared with Cabernet Sauvignon and Saperavi vinifications. For all the vintages, the fermentations took shorter time for wild grape, despite the highest content of total phenols. Learning from the past, <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< might still be an interesting genetic resource for future breeding programs. Furthermore, the possible combination of wild and domesticated grapes can make possible the production of wines with long ageing, exalting their own characteristics. wild grapes Caucasus Neolithic wines genetic resources grapevine domestication viticulture Agriculture S Shengeli Kikilashvili verfasserin aut Olan Gotsiridze verfasserin aut Tamar Maghradze verfasserin aut Daniela Fracassetti verfasserin aut Osvaldo Failla verfasserin aut Laura Rustioni verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 11(2021), 3, p 472 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:3, p 472 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030472 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/3/472 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 3, p 472
allfieldsGer	10.3390/agronomy11030472 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057608482 (DE-599)DOAJ9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng David Maghradze verfasserin aut Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i< 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Wine has been produced in Georgia since the 6th millennium BC. The processes of cultivar selection and breeding started with wild grapes <i<Vitis vinifera</i< L. ssp. <i<sylvestris</i< Gmel. and included multiple introgression events—from the wild to domestication. This article aims at improving the knowledge concerning the history of winemaking through a comparison of the <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and subsp. <i<sativa</i<. Grapes of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< were grown in an ampelographic collection and vintages 2017–2020 were analyzed. The obtained data were compared to a wider dataset available in literature concerning <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sativa</i<, demonstrating the central role of grape morphology in the domestication process. This evidence suggests that the technological value of the cultivars played an important role in the selection process. In vintages 2017, 2018, and 2019, wines were produced with <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< grapes and compared with Cabernet Sauvignon and Saperavi vinifications. For all the vintages, the fermentations took shorter time for wild grape, despite the highest content of total phenols. Learning from the past, <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< might still be an interesting genetic resource for future breeding programs. Furthermore, the possible combination of wild and domesticated grapes can make possible the production of wines with long ageing, exalting their own characteristics. wild grapes Caucasus Neolithic wines genetic resources grapevine domestication viticulture Agriculture S Shengeli Kikilashvili verfasserin aut Olan Gotsiridze verfasserin aut Tamar Maghradze verfasserin aut Daniela Fracassetti verfasserin aut Osvaldo Failla verfasserin aut Laura Rustioni verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 11(2021), 3, p 472 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:3, p 472 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030472 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/3/472 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 3, p 472
allfieldsSound	10.3390/agronomy11030472 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057608482 (DE-599)DOAJ9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng David Maghradze verfasserin aut Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i< 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Wine has been produced in Georgia since the 6th millennium BC. The processes of cultivar selection and breeding started with wild grapes <i<Vitis vinifera</i< L. ssp. <i<sylvestris</i< Gmel. and included multiple introgression events—from the wild to domestication. This article aims at improving the knowledge concerning the history of winemaking through a comparison of the <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and subsp. <i<sativa</i<. Grapes of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< were grown in an ampelographic collection and vintages 2017–2020 were analyzed. The obtained data were compared to a wider dataset available in literature concerning <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sativa</i<, demonstrating the central role of grape morphology in the domestication process. This evidence suggests that the technological value of the cultivars played an important role in the selection process. In vintages 2017, 2018, and 2019, wines were produced with <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< grapes and compared with Cabernet Sauvignon and Saperavi vinifications. For all the vintages, the fermentations took shorter time for wild grape, despite the highest content of total phenols. Learning from the past, <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< might still be an interesting genetic resource for future breeding programs. Furthermore, the possible combination of wild and domesticated grapes can make possible the production of wines with long ageing, exalting their own characteristics. wild grapes Caucasus Neolithic wines genetic resources grapevine domestication viticulture Agriculture S Shengeli Kikilashvili verfasserin aut Olan Gotsiridze verfasserin aut Tamar Maghradze verfasserin aut Daniela Fracassetti verfasserin aut Osvaldo Failla verfasserin aut Laura Rustioni verfasserin aut In Agronomy MDPI AG, 2012 11(2021), 3, p 472 (DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1 20734395 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:3, p 472 https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030472 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/3/472 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 3, p 472
language	English
source	In Agronomy 11(2021), 3, p 472 volume:11 year:2021 number:3, p 472
sourceStr	In Agronomy 11(2021), 3, p 472 volume:11 year:2021 number:3, p 472
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	wild grapes Caucasus Neolithic wines genetic resources grapevine domestication viticulture Agriculture S
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Agronomy
authorswithroles_txt_mv	David Maghradze @@aut@@ Shengeli Kikilashvili @@aut@@ Olan Gotsiridze @@aut@@ Tamar Maghradze @@aut@@ Daniela Fracassetti @@aut@@ Osvaldo Failla @@aut@@ Laura Rustioni @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	658000543
id	DOAJ057608482
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ057608482</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414082757.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/agronomy11030472</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ057608482</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David Maghradze</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wine has been produced in Georgia since the 6th millennium BC. The processes of cultivar selection and breeding started with wild grapes <i<Vitis vinifera</i< L. ssp. <i<sylvestris</i< Gmel. and included multiple introgression events—from the wild to domestication. This article aims at improving the knowledge concerning the history of winemaking through a comparison of the <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and subsp. <i<sativa</i<. Grapes of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< were grown in an ampelographic collection and vintages 2017–2020 were analyzed. The obtained data were compared to a wider dataset available in literature concerning <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sativa</i<, demonstrating the central role of grape morphology in the domestication process. This evidence suggests that the technological value of the cultivars played an important role in the selection process. In vintages 2017, 2018, and 2019, wines were produced with <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< grapes and compared with Cabernet Sauvignon and Saperavi vinifications. For all the vintages, the fermentations took shorter time for wild grape, despite the highest content of total phenols. Learning from the past, <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< might still be an interesting genetic resource for future breeding programs. Furthermore, the possible combination of wild and domesticated grapes can make possible the production of wines with long ageing, exalting their own characteristics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wild grapes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Caucasus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neolithic wines</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">genetic resources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">grapevine domestication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">viticulture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shengeli Kikilashvili</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Olan Gotsiridze</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tamar Maghradze</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniela Fracassetti</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Osvaldo Failla</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laura Rustioni</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Agronomy</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2021), 3, p 472</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)658000543</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2607043-1</subfield><subfield code="x">20734395</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3, p 472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030472</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/3/472</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">3, p 472</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	David Maghradze
spellingShingle	David Maghradze misc wild grapes misc Caucasus misc Neolithic wines misc genetic resources misc grapevine domestication misc viticulture misc Agriculture misc S Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i<
authorStr	David Maghradze
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)658000543
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	20734395
topic_title	Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i< wild grapes Caucasus Neolithic wines genetic resources grapevine domestication viticulture
topic	misc wild grapes misc Caucasus misc Neolithic wines misc genetic resources misc grapevine domestication misc viticulture misc Agriculture misc S
topic_unstemmed	misc wild grapes misc Caucasus misc Neolithic wines misc genetic resources misc grapevine domestication misc viticulture misc Agriculture misc S
topic_browse	misc wild grapes misc Caucasus misc Neolithic wines misc genetic resources misc grapevine domestication misc viticulture misc Agriculture misc S
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Agronomy
hierarchy_parent_id	658000543
hierarchy_top_title	Agronomy
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)658000543 (DE-600)2607043-1
title	Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i<
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ057608482 (DE-599)DOAJ9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7
title_full	Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i<
author_sort	David Maghradze
journal	Agronomy
journalStr	Agronomy
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	David Maghradze Shengeli Kikilashvili Olan Gotsiridze Tamar Maghradze Daniela Fracassetti Osvaldo Failla Laura Rustioni
container_volume	11
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	David Maghradze
doi_str_mv	10.3390/agronomy11030472
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	comparison between the grape technological characteristics of <i<vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and subsp. <i<sativa</i<
title_auth	Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i<
abstract	Wine has been produced in Georgia since the 6th millennium BC. The processes of cultivar selection and breeding started with wild grapes <i<Vitis vinifera</i< L. ssp. <i<sylvestris</i< Gmel. and included multiple introgression events—from the wild to domestication. This article aims at improving the knowledge concerning the history of winemaking through a comparison of the <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and subsp. <i<sativa</i<. Grapes of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< were grown in an ampelographic collection and vintages 2017–2020 were analyzed. The obtained data were compared to a wider dataset available in literature concerning <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sativa</i<, demonstrating the central role of grape morphology in the domestication process. This evidence suggests that the technological value of the cultivars played an important role in the selection process. In vintages 2017, 2018, and 2019, wines were produced with <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< grapes and compared with Cabernet Sauvignon and Saperavi vinifications. For all the vintages, the fermentations took shorter time for wild grape, despite the highest content of total phenols. Learning from the past, <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< might still be an interesting genetic resource for future breeding programs. Furthermore, the possible combination of wild and domesticated grapes can make possible the production of wines with long ageing, exalting their own characteristics.
abstractGer	Wine has been produced in Georgia since the 6th millennium BC. The processes of cultivar selection and breeding started with wild grapes <i<Vitis vinifera</i< L. ssp. <i<sylvestris</i< Gmel. and included multiple introgression events—from the wild to domestication. This article aims at improving the knowledge concerning the history of winemaking through a comparison of the <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and subsp. <i<sativa</i<. Grapes of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< were grown in an ampelographic collection and vintages 2017–2020 were analyzed. The obtained data were compared to a wider dataset available in literature concerning <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sativa</i<, demonstrating the central role of grape morphology in the domestication process. This evidence suggests that the technological value of the cultivars played an important role in the selection process. In vintages 2017, 2018, and 2019, wines were produced with <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< grapes and compared with Cabernet Sauvignon and Saperavi vinifications. For all the vintages, the fermentations took shorter time for wild grape, despite the highest content of total phenols. Learning from the past, <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< might still be an interesting genetic resource for future breeding programs. Furthermore, the possible combination of wild and domesticated grapes can make possible the production of wines with long ageing, exalting their own characteristics.
abstract_unstemmed	Wine has been produced in Georgia since the 6th millennium BC. The processes of cultivar selection and breeding started with wild grapes <i<Vitis vinifera</i< L. ssp. <i<sylvestris</i< Gmel. and included multiple introgression events—from the wild to domestication. This article aims at improving the knowledge concerning the history of winemaking through a comparison of the <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and subsp. <i<sativa</i<. Grapes of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< were grown in an ampelographic collection and vintages 2017–2020 were analyzed. The obtained data were compared to a wider dataset available in literature concerning <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sativa</i<, demonstrating the central role of grape morphology in the domestication process. This evidence suggests that the technological value of the cultivars played an important role in the selection process. In vintages 2017, 2018, and 2019, wines were produced with <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< grapes and compared with Cabernet Sauvignon and Saperavi vinifications. For all the vintages, the fermentations took shorter time for wild grape, despite the highest content of total phenols. Learning from the past, <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< might still be an interesting genetic resource for future breeding programs. Furthermore, the possible combination of wild and domesticated grapes can make possible the production of wines with long ageing, exalting their own characteristics.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	3, p 472
title_short	Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i<
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030472 https://doaj.org/article/9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7 https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/3/472 https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395
remote_bool	true
author2	Shengeli Kikilashvili Olan Gotsiridze Tamar Maghradze Daniela Fracassetti Osvaldo Failla Laura Rustioni
author2Str	Shengeli Kikilashvili Olan Gotsiridze Tamar Maghradze Daniela Fracassetti Osvaldo Failla Laura Rustioni
ppnlink	658000543
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/agronomy11030472
up_date	2024-07-04T02:17:53.284Z
_version_	1803613082260340736
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ057608482</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414082757.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/agronomy11030472</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ057608482</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David Maghradze</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wine has been produced in Georgia since the 6th millennium BC. The processes of cultivar selection and breeding started with wild grapes <i<Vitis vinifera</i< L. ssp. <i<sylvestris</i< Gmel. and included multiple introgression events—from the wild to domestication. This article aims at improving the knowledge concerning the history of winemaking through a comparison of the <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and subsp. <i<sativa</i<. Grapes of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< were grown in an ampelographic collection and vintages 2017–2020 were analyzed. The obtained data were compared to a wider dataset available in literature concerning <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sativa</i<, demonstrating the central role of grape morphology in the domestication process. This evidence suggests that the technological value of the cultivars played an important role in the selection process. In vintages 2017, 2018, and 2019, wines were produced with <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< grapes and compared with Cabernet Sauvignon and Saperavi vinifications. For all the vintages, the fermentations took shorter time for wild grape, despite the highest content of total phenols. Learning from the past, <i<Vitis vinifera</i< subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< might still be an interesting genetic resource for future breeding programs. Furthermore, the possible combination of wild and domesticated grapes can make possible the production of wines with long ageing, exalting their own characteristics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">wild grapes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Caucasus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Neolithic wines</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">genetic resources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">grapevine domestication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">viticulture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shengeli Kikilashvili</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Olan Gotsiridze</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tamar Maghradze</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniela Fracassetti</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Osvaldo Failla</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Laura Rustioni</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Agronomy</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2021), 3, p 472</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)658000543</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2607043-1</subfield><subfield code="x">20734395</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3, p 472</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11030472</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/9ea958b5cdcc45ec851867c9e628e4b7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/3/472</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">3, p 472</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.397312

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Comparison between the Grape Technological Characteristics of <i<Vitis vinifera</i< Subsp. <i<sylvestris</i< and Subsp. <i<sativa</i<

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?