Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam
Statement of Problem: Perforations are significant complications that can occur during root canal therapy and may result in the destruction of adjacent periodontal tissues. An ideal material for repairing a perforation should be biocompatible and have a high sealing ability. Purpose: The aim of thi...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
K. Ashofteh-Yazdi [verfasserIn] M. Masoodi [verfasserIn] N.Shokouhinejad [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2006 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Frontiers in Dentistry - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2020, 3(2006), 2 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:3 ; year:2006 ; number:2 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ057715734 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ057715734 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230308215616.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230227s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ057715734 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a RK1-715 | |
100 | 0 | |a K. Ashofteh-Yazdi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam |
264 | 1 | |c 2006 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Statement of Problem: Perforations are significant complications that can occur during root canal therapy and may result in the destruction of adjacent periodontal tissues. An ideal material for repairing a perforation should be biocompatible and have a high sealing ability. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare histologic tissue responses of experimentally induced pulp chamber perforations in dogs’ teeth repaired with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Materials and Methods: Fifty-four lower premolars of 9 dogs were used for this interventional study. Access cavities were prepared and perforations were created on the floors of the pulp chambers. The samples were divided into three experimental groups of 12 teeth and positive and negative control groups consisted of 12 and 6 teeth, respectively. The perforations in the study groups were sealed with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and MTA. All access cavities were filled with light-cured glass ionomer. Five dogs were sacrificed after seven days and 4 dogs were put to death after 28 days. The premolars along with the surrounding alveolar bone were cut in block sections and histologically evaluated for inflammation, bone formation and epithelial proliferation. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests . Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in inflammation and bone regeneration, between amalgam and MTA at both time periods. Conclusion: It appears that MTA and GI are more suitable materials for perforation repair, as compared to amalgam | ||
650 | 4 | |a Pulp chamber Perforation | |
650 | 4 | |a Light-cured glass ionomer | |
653 | 0 | |a Dentistry | |
700 | 0 | |a M. Masoodi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a N.Shokouhinejad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Frontiers in Dentistry |d Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2020 |g 3(2006), 2 |w (DE-627)1694558967 |x 2676296X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2006 |g number:2 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/ddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/82 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2676-296X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 3 |j 2006 |e 2 |
author_variant |
k a y kay m m mm n |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:2676296X:2006----::oprsnfiseecinfuphmeproainidgtehraewtmaih |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2006 |
callnumber-subject-code |
RK |
publishDate |
2006 |
allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ057715734 (DE-599)DOAJddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 K. Ashofteh-Yazdi verfasserin aut Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Statement of Problem: Perforations are significant complications that can occur during root canal therapy and may result in the destruction of adjacent periodontal tissues. An ideal material for repairing a perforation should be biocompatible and have a high sealing ability. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare histologic tissue responses of experimentally induced pulp chamber perforations in dogs’ teeth repaired with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Materials and Methods: Fifty-four lower premolars of 9 dogs were used for this interventional study. Access cavities were prepared and perforations were created on the floors of the pulp chambers. The samples were divided into three experimental groups of 12 teeth and positive and negative control groups consisted of 12 and 6 teeth, respectively. The perforations in the study groups were sealed with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and MTA. All access cavities were filled with light-cured glass ionomer. Five dogs were sacrificed after seven days and 4 dogs were put to death after 28 days. The premolars along with the surrounding alveolar bone were cut in block sections and histologically evaluated for inflammation, bone formation and epithelial proliferation. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests . Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in inflammation and bone regeneration, between amalgam and MTA at both time periods. Conclusion: It appears that MTA and GI are more suitable materials for perforation repair, as compared to amalgam Pulp chamber Perforation Light-cured glass ionomer Dentistry M. Masoodi verfasserin aut N.Shokouhinejad verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Dentistry Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2020 3(2006), 2 (DE-627)1694558967 2676296X nnns volume:3 year:2006 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/ddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 kostenfrei https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/82 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-296X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 3 2006 2 |
spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ057715734 (DE-599)DOAJddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 K. Ashofteh-Yazdi verfasserin aut Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Statement of Problem: Perforations are significant complications that can occur during root canal therapy and may result in the destruction of adjacent periodontal tissues. An ideal material for repairing a perforation should be biocompatible and have a high sealing ability. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare histologic tissue responses of experimentally induced pulp chamber perforations in dogs’ teeth repaired with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Materials and Methods: Fifty-four lower premolars of 9 dogs were used for this interventional study. Access cavities were prepared and perforations were created on the floors of the pulp chambers. The samples were divided into three experimental groups of 12 teeth and positive and negative control groups consisted of 12 and 6 teeth, respectively. The perforations in the study groups were sealed with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and MTA. All access cavities were filled with light-cured glass ionomer. Five dogs were sacrificed after seven days and 4 dogs were put to death after 28 days. The premolars along with the surrounding alveolar bone were cut in block sections and histologically evaluated for inflammation, bone formation and epithelial proliferation. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests . Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in inflammation and bone regeneration, between amalgam and MTA at both time periods. Conclusion: It appears that MTA and GI are more suitable materials for perforation repair, as compared to amalgam Pulp chamber Perforation Light-cured glass ionomer Dentistry M. Masoodi verfasserin aut N.Shokouhinejad verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Dentistry Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2020 3(2006), 2 (DE-627)1694558967 2676296X nnns volume:3 year:2006 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/ddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 kostenfrei https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/82 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-296X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 3 2006 2 |
allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ057715734 (DE-599)DOAJddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 K. Ashofteh-Yazdi verfasserin aut Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Statement of Problem: Perforations are significant complications that can occur during root canal therapy and may result in the destruction of adjacent periodontal tissues. An ideal material for repairing a perforation should be biocompatible and have a high sealing ability. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare histologic tissue responses of experimentally induced pulp chamber perforations in dogs’ teeth repaired with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Materials and Methods: Fifty-four lower premolars of 9 dogs were used for this interventional study. Access cavities were prepared and perforations were created on the floors of the pulp chambers. The samples were divided into three experimental groups of 12 teeth and positive and negative control groups consisted of 12 and 6 teeth, respectively. The perforations in the study groups were sealed with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and MTA. All access cavities were filled with light-cured glass ionomer. Five dogs were sacrificed after seven days and 4 dogs were put to death after 28 days. The premolars along with the surrounding alveolar bone were cut in block sections and histologically evaluated for inflammation, bone formation and epithelial proliferation. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests . Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in inflammation and bone regeneration, between amalgam and MTA at both time periods. Conclusion: It appears that MTA and GI are more suitable materials for perforation repair, as compared to amalgam Pulp chamber Perforation Light-cured glass ionomer Dentistry M. Masoodi verfasserin aut N.Shokouhinejad verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Dentistry Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2020 3(2006), 2 (DE-627)1694558967 2676296X nnns volume:3 year:2006 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/ddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 kostenfrei https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/82 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-296X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 3 2006 2 |
allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ057715734 (DE-599)DOAJddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 K. Ashofteh-Yazdi verfasserin aut Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Statement of Problem: Perforations are significant complications that can occur during root canal therapy and may result in the destruction of adjacent periodontal tissues. An ideal material for repairing a perforation should be biocompatible and have a high sealing ability. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare histologic tissue responses of experimentally induced pulp chamber perforations in dogs’ teeth repaired with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Materials and Methods: Fifty-four lower premolars of 9 dogs were used for this interventional study. Access cavities were prepared and perforations were created on the floors of the pulp chambers. The samples were divided into three experimental groups of 12 teeth and positive and negative control groups consisted of 12 and 6 teeth, respectively. The perforations in the study groups were sealed with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and MTA. All access cavities were filled with light-cured glass ionomer. Five dogs were sacrificed after seven days and 4 dogs were put to death after 28 days. The premolars along with the surrounding alveolar bone were cut in block sections and histologically evaluated for inflammation, bone formation and epithelial proliferation. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests . Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in inflammation and bone regeneration, between amalgam and MTA at both time periods. Conclusion: It appears that MTA and GI are more suitable materials for perforation repair, as compared to amalgam Pulp chamber Perforation Light-cured glass ionomer Dentistry M. Masoodi verfasserin aut N.Shokouhinejad verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Dentistry Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2020 3(2006), 2 (DE-627)1694558967 2676296X nnns volume:3 year:2006 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/ddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 kostenfrei https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/82 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-296X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 3 2006 2 |
allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ057715734 (DE-599)DOAJddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 K. Ashofteh-Yazdi verfasserin aut Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam 2006 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Statement of Problem: Perforations are significant complications that can occur during root canal therapy and may result in the destruction of adjacent periodontal tissues. An ideal material for repairing a perforation should be biocompatible and have a high sealing ability. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare histologic tissue responses of experimentally induced pulp chamber perforations in dogs’ teeth repaired with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Materials and Methods: Fifty-four lower premolars of 9 dogs were used for this interventional study. Access cavities were prepared and perforations were created on the floors of the pulp chambers. The samples were divided into three experimental groups of 12 teeth and positive and negative control groups consisted of 12 and 6 teeth, respectively. The perforations in the study groups were sealed with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and MTA. All access cavities were filled with light-cured glass ionomer. Five dogs were sacrificed after seven days and 4 dogs were put to death after 28 days. The premolars along with the surrounding alveolar bone were cut in block sections and histologically evaluated for inflammation, bone formation and epithelial proliferation. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests . Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in inflammation and bone regeneration, between amalgam and MTA at both time periods. Conclusion: It appears that MTA and GI are more suitable materials for perforation repair, as compared to amalgam Pulp chamber Perforation Light-cured glass ionomer Dentistry M. Masoodi verfasserin aut N.Shokouhinejad verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Dentistry Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2020 3(2006), 2 (DE-627)1694558967 2676296X nnns volume:3 year:2006 number:2 https://doaj.org/article/ddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 kostenfrei https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/82 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2676-296X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 3 2006 2 |
language |
English |
source |
In Frontiers in Dentistry 3(2006), 2 volume:3 year:2006 number:2 |
sourceStr |
In Frontiers in Dentistry 3(2006), 2 volume:3 year:2006 number:2 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Pulp chamber Perforation Light-cured glass ionomer Dentistry |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Frontiers in Dentistry |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
K. Ashofteh-Yazdi @@aut@@ M. Masoodi @@aut@@ N.Shokouhinejad @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2006-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1694558967 |
id |
DOAJ057715734 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ057715734</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308215616.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ057715734</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RK1-715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K. Ashofteh-Yazdi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Statement of Problem: Perforations are significant complications that can occur during root canal therapy and may result in the destruction of adjacent periodontal tissues. An ideal material for repairing a perforation should be biocompatible and have a high sealing ability. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare histologic tissue responses of experimentally induced pulp chamber perforations in dogs’ teeth repaired with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Materials and Methods: Fifty-four lower premolars of 9 dogs were used for this interventional study. Access cavities were prepared and perforations were created on the floors of the pulp chambers. The samples were divided into three experimental groups of 12 teeth and positive and negative control groups consisted of 12 and 6 teeth, respectively. The perforations in the study groups were sealed with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and MTA. All access cavities were filled with light-cured glass ionomer. Five dogs were sacrificed after seven days and 4 dogs were put to death after 28 days. The premolars along with the surrounding alveolar bone were cut in block sections and histologically evaluated for inflammation, bone formation and epithelial proliferation. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests . Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in inflammation and bone regeneration, between amalgam and MTA at both time periods. Conclusion: It appears that MTA and GI are more suitable materials for perforation repair, as compared to amalgam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pulp chamber Perforation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Light-cured glass ionomer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M. Masoodi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N.Shokouhinejad</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Dentistry</subfield><subfield code="d">Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2006), 2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1694558967</subfield><subfield code="x">2676296X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2006</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/82</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2676-296X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2006</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
author |
K. Ashofteh-Yazdi |
spellingShingle |
K. Ashofteh-Yazdi misc RK1-715 misc Pulp chamber Perforation misc Light-cured glass ionomer misc Dentistry Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam |
authorStr |
K. Ashofteh-Yazdi |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1694558967 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
RK1-715 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
2676296X |
topic_title |
RK1-715 Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam Pulp chamber Perforation Light-cured glass ionomer |
topic |
misc RK1-715 misc Pulp chamber Perforation misc Light-cured glass ionomer misc Dentistry |
topic_unstemmed |
misc RK1-715 misc Pulp chamber Perforation misc Light-cured glass ionomer misc Dentistry |
topic_browse |
misc RK1-715 misc Pulp chamber Perforation misc Light-cured glass ionomer misc Dentistry |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Frontiers in Dentistry |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1694558967 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Frontiers in Dentistry |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1694558967 |
title |
Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ057715734 (DE-599)DOAJddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 |
title_full |
Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam |
author_sort |
K. Ashofteh-Yazdi |
journal |
Frontiers in Dentistry |
journalStr |
Frontiers in Dentistry |
callnumber-first-code |
R |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2006 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
K. Ashofteh-Yazdi M. Masoodi N.Shokouhinejad |
container_volume |
3 |
class |
RK1-715 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
K. Ashofteh-Yazdi |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
comparison of tissue reaction of pulp chamber perforations in dogs’ teeth treated with mta, light-cured glass ionomer and amalgam |
callnumber |
RK1-715 |
title_auth |
Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam |
abstract |
Statement of Problem: Perforations are significant complications that can occur during root canal therapy and may result in the destruction of adjacent periodontal tissues. An ideal material for repairing a perforation should be biocompatible and have a high sealing ability. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare histologic tissue responses of experimentally induced pulp chamber perforations in dogs’ teeth repaired with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Materials and Methods: Fifty-four lower premolars of 9 dogs were used for this interventional study. Access cavities were prepared and perforations were created on the floors of the pulp chambers. The samples were divided into three experimental groups of 12 teeth and positive and negative control groups consisted of 12 and 6 teeth, respectively. The perforations in the study groups were sealed with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and MTA. All access cavities were filled with light-cured glass ionomer. Five dogs were sacrificed after seven days and 4 dogs were put to death after 28 days. The premolars along with the surrounding alveolar bone were cut in block sections and histologically evaluated for inflammation, bone formation and epithelial proliferation. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests . Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in inflammation and bone regeneration, between amalgam and MTA at both time periods. Conclusion: It appears that MTA and GI are more suitable materials for perforation repair, as compared to amalgam |
abstractGer |
Statement of Problem: Perforations are significant complications that can occur during root canal therapy and may result in the destruction of adjacent periodontal tissues. An ideal material for repairing a perforation should be biocompatible and have a high sealing ability. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare histologic tissue responses of experimentally induced pulp chamber perforations in dogs’ teeth repaired with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Materials and Methods: Fifty-four lower premolars of 9 dogs were used for this interventional study. Access cavities were prepared and perforations were created on the floors of the pulp chambers. The samples were divided into three experimental groups of 12 teeth and positive and negative control groups consisted of 12 and 6 teeth, respectively. The perforations in the study groups were sealed with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and MTA. All access cavities were filled with light-cured glass ionomer. Five dogs were sacrificed after seven days and 4 dogs were put to death after 28 days. The premolars along with the surrounding alveolar bone were cut in block sections and histologically evaluated for inflammation, bone formation and epithelial proliferation. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests . Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in inflammation and bone regeneration, between amalgam and MTA at both time periods. Conclusion: It appears that MTA and GI are more suitable materials for perforation repair, as compared to amalgam |
abstract_unstemmed |
Statement of Problem: Perforations are significant complications that can occur during root canal therapy and may result in the destruction of adjacent periodontal tissues. An ideal material for repairing a perforation should be biocompatible and have a high sealing ability. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare histologic tissue responses of experimentally induced pulp chamber perforations in dogs’ teeth repaired with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Materials and Methods: Fifty-four lower premolars of 9 dogs were used for this interventional study. Access cavities were prepared and perforations were created on the floors of the pulp chambers. The samples were divided into three experimental groups of 12 teeth and positive and negative control groups consisted of 12 and 6 teeth, respectively. The perforations in the study groups were sealed with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and MTA. All access cavities were filled with light-cured glass ionomer. Five dogs were sacrificed after seven days and 4 dogs were put to death after 28 days. The premolars along with the surrounding alveolar bone were cut in block sections and histologically evaluated for inflammation, bone formation and epithelial proliferation. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests . Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in inflammation and bone regeneration, between amalgam and MTA at both time periods. Conclusion: It appears that MTA and GI are more suitable materials for perforation repair, as compared to amalgam |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/ddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22 https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/82 https://doaj.org/toc/2676-296X |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
M. Masoodi N.Shokouhinejad |
author2Str |
M. Masoodi N.Shokouhinejad |
ppnlink |
1694558967 |
callnumber-subject |
RK - Dentistry |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
callnumber-a |
RK1-715 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T13:40:54.174Z |
_version_ |
1803565456874799104 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ057715734</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308215616.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2006 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ057715734</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RK1-715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K. Ashofteh-Yazdi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of Tissue Reaction of Pulp Chamber Perforations in Dogs’ Teeth Treated with MTA, Light-Cured Glass Ionomer and Amalgam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Statement of Problem: Perforations are significant complications that can occur during root canal therapy and may result in the destruction of adjacent periodontal tissues. An ideal material for repairing a perforation should be biocompatible and have a high sealing ability. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare histologic tissue responses of experimentally induced pulp chamber perforations in dogs’ teeth repaired with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). Materials and Methods: Fifty-four lower premolars of 9 dogs were used for this interventional study. Access cavities were prepared and perforations were created on the floors of the pulp chambers. The samples were divided into three experimental groups of 12 teeth and positive and negative control groups consisted of 12 and 6 teeth, respectively. The perforations in the study groups were sealed with amalgam, light-cured glass ionomer and MTA. All access cavities were filled with light-cured glass ionomer. Five dogs were sacrificed after seven days and 4 dogs were put to death after 28 days. The premolars along with the surrounding alveolar bone were cut in block sections and histologically evaluated for inflammation, bone formation and epithelial proliferation. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests . Results: A statistically significant difference was observed in inflammation and bone regeneration, between amalgam and MTA at both time periods. Conclusion: It appears that MTA and GI are more suitable materials for perforation repair, as compared to amalgam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Pulp chamber Perforation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Light-cured glass ionomer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M. Masoodi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N.Shokouhinejad</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Dentistry</subfield><subfield code="d">Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2006), 2</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1694558967</subfield><subfield code="x">2676296X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2006</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ddcdc815261e470d8900b4d392792a22</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/82</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2676-296X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2006</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.399907 |