Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading

Naval vessels may undergo high strain rate loading, including impact, wave slamming and blast loading. Predicting the behaviour of composite sandwich structures to such loading is complicated, hence representative experiments are required. Two panels with hybrid carbon-and glass-fibre skins were fab...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Rolfe Emily [verfasserIn] Arora Hari [verfasserIn] Hooper Paul A. [verfasserIn] Dear John P. [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2018

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: EPJ Web of Conferences - EDP Sciences, 2010, 183, p 02003(2018)
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:183, p 02003 ; year:2018

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1051/epjconf/201818302003

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ057995850

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ057995850
003	DE-627
005	20230308222119.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230227s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ057995850
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a QC1-999
100	0		\|a Rolfe Emily \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading
264		1	\|c 2018
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Naval vessels may undergo high strain rate loading, including impact, wave slamming and blast loading. Predicting the behaviour of composite sandwich structures to such loading is complicated, hence representative experiments are required. Two panels with hybrid carbon-and glass-fibre skins were fabricated and subjected to full-scale air blast loading. The panels were 1.7 × 1.5 m in size and were subjected to a 100 kg nitromethane charge at a stand-off distance of 15 m. 3D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was implemented behind each of the panels to record the full-field out-of-plane displacement of the panels. In addition, the panels were instrumented with foil strain gauges on the front skins to record the response of the panel side in contact with the blast. The results revealed that the combination of glass-and carbon-fibre improves the blast resilience when compared to previous blast testing on panels with exclusively glass-fibre or carbon-fibre skins. However, the order in which the glass-and carbon-fibre layers were arranged did not have a significant effect on the overall panel performance. In addition, panels with the same hybrid skins were subjected to high velocity impact testing. An aluminium projectile with 25 mm diameter was fired at small scale panels (160 × 160 mm) using a laboratory gas gun at a velocity of 78 ms−1. 3D DIC was again used to record the out-of-plane displacement of these panels. In contrast to the blast experiment, the impact results showed that the order in which glass-and carbon-fibres were arranged did affect both the out-of-plane displacement and damage to the panels. The least damage occurred when glass-fibre layers were placed on the outermost layers impacted by the projectile.
653		0	\|a Physics
700	0		\|a Arora Hari \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Hooper Paul A. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Dear John P. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t EPJ Web of Conferences \|d EDP Sciences, 2010 \|g 183, p 02003(2018) \|w (DE-627)647306611 \|w (DE-600)2595425-8 \|x 2100014X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:183, p 02003 \|g year:2018
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2100-014X \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 183, p 02003 \|j 2018

Indexfelder

author_variant	r e re a h ah h p a hpa d j p djp
matchkey_str	article:2100014X:2018----::yrdopstsnwcpnludrls
hierarchy_sort_str	2018
callnumber-subject-code	QC
publishDate	2018
allfields	10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057995850 (DE-599)DOAJ47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QC1-999 Rolfe Emily verfasserin aut Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Naval vessels may undergo high strain rate loading, including impact, wave slamming and blast loading. Predicting the behaviour of composite sandwich structures to such loading is complicated, hence representative experiments are required. Two panels with hybrid carbon-and glass-fibre skins were fabricated and subjected to full-scale air blast loading. The panels were 1.7 × 1.5 m in size and were subjected to a 100 kg nitromethane charge at a stand-off distance of 15 m. 3D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was implemented behind each of the panels to record the full-field out-of-plane displacement of the panels. In addition, the panels were instrumented with foil strain gauges on the front skins to record the response of the panel side in contact with the blast. The results revealed that the combination of glass-and carbon-fibre improves the blast resilience when compared to previous blast testing on panels with exclusively glass-fibre or carbon-fibre skins. However, the order in which the glass-and carbon-fibre layers were arranged did not have a significant effect on the overall panel performance. In addition, panels with the same hybrid skins were subjected to high velocity impact testing. An aluminium projectile with 25 mm diameter was fired at small scale panels (160 × 160 mm) using a laboratory gas gun at a velocity of 78 ms−1. 3D DIC was again used to record the out-of-plane displacement of these panels. In contrast to the blast experiment, the impact results showed that the order in which glass-and carbon-fibres were arranged did affect both the out-of-plane displacement and damage to the panels. The least damage occurred when glass-fibre layers were placed on the outermost layers impacted by the projectile. Physics Arora Hari verfasserin aut Hooper Paul A. verfasserin aut Dear John P. verfasserin aut In EPJ Web of Conferences EDP Sciences, 2010 183, p 02003(2018) (DE-627)647306611 (DE-600)2595425-8 2100014X nnns volume:183, p 02003 year:2018 https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2100-014X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 183, p 02003 2018
spelling	10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057995850 (DE-599)DOAJ47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QC1-999 Rolfe Emily verfasserin aut Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Naval vessels may undergo high strain rate loading, including impact, wave slamming and blast loading. Predicting the behaviour of composite sandwich structures to such loading is complicated, hence representative experiments are required. Two panels with hybrid carbon-and glass-fibre skins were fabricated and subjected to full-scale air blast loading. The panels were 1.7 × 1.5 m in size and were subjected to a 100 kg nitromethane charge at a stand-off distance of 15 m. 3D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was implemented behind each of the panels to record the full-field out-of-plane displacement of the panels. In addition, the panels were instrumented with foil strain gauges on the front skins to record the response of the panel side in contact with the blast. The results revealed that the combination of glass-and carbon-fibre improves the blast resilience when compared to previous blast testing on panels with exclusively glass-fibre or carbon-fibre skins. However, the order in which the glass-and carbon-fibre layers were arranged did not have a significant effect on the overall panel performance. In addition, panels with the same hybrid skins were subjected to high velocity impact testing. An aluminium projectile with 25 mm diameter was fired at small scale panels (160 × 160 mm) using a laboratory gas gun at a velocity of 78 ms−1. 3D DIC was again used to record the out-of-plane displacement of these panels. In contrast to the blast experiment, the impact results showed that the order in which glass-and carbon-fibres were arranged did affect both the out-of-plane displacement and damage to the panels. The least damage occurred when glass-fibre layers were placed on the outermost layers impacted by the projectile. Physics Arora Hari verfasserin aut Hooper Paul A. verfasserin aut Dear John P. verfasserin aut In EPJ Web of Conferences EDP Sciences, 2010 183, p 02003(2018) (DE-627)647306611 (DE-600)2595425-8 2100014X nnns volume:183, p 02003 year:2018 https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2100-014X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 183, p 02003 2018
allfields_unstemmed	10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057995850 (DE-599)DOAJ47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QC1-999 Rolfe Emily verfasserin aut Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Naval vessels may undergo high strain rate loading, including impact, wave slamming and blast loading. Predicting the behaviour of composite sandwich structures to such loading is complicated, hence representative experiments are required. Two panels with hybrid carbon-and glass-fibre skins were fabricated and subjected to full-scale air blast loading. The panels were 1.7 × 1.5 m in size and were subjected to a 100 kg nitromethane charge at a stand-off distance of 15 m. 3D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was implemented behind each of the panels to record the full-field out-of-plane displacement of the panels. In addition, the panels were instrumented with foil strain gauges on the front skins to record the response of the panel side in contact with the blast. The results revealed that the combination of glass-and carbon-fibre improves the blast resilience when compared to previous blast testing on panels with exclusively glass-fibre or carbon-fibre skins. However, the order in which the glass-and carbon-fibre layers were arranged did not have a significant effect on the overall panel performance. In addition, panels with the same hybrid skins were subjected to high velocity impact testing. An aluminium projectile with 25 mm diameter was fired at small scale panels (160 × 160 mm) using a laboratory gas gun at a velocity of 78 ms−1. 3D DIC was again used to record the out-of-plane displacement of these panels. In contrast to the blast experiment, the impact results showed that the order in which glass-and carbon-fibres were arranged did affect both the out-of-plane displacement and damage to the panels. The least damage occurred when glass-fibre layers were placed on the outermost layers impacted by the projectile. Physics Arora Hari verfasserin aut Hooper Paul A. verfasserin aut Dear John P. verfasserin aut In EPJ Web of Conferences EDP Sciences, 2010 183, p 02003(2018) (DE-627)647306611 (DE-600)2595425-8 2100014X nnns volume:183, p 02003 year:2018 https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2100-014X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 183, p 02003 2018
allfieldsGer	10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057995850 (DE-599)DOAJ47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QC1-999 Rolfe Emily verfasserin aut Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Naval vessels may undergo high strain rate loading, including impact, wave slamming and blast loading. Predicting the behaviour of composite sandwich structures to such loading is complicated, hence representative experiments are required. Two panels with hybrid carbon-and glass-fibre skins were fabricated and subjected to full-scale air blast loading. The panels were 1.7 × 1.5 m in size and were subjected to a 100 kg nitromethane charge at a stand-off distance of 15 m. 3D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was implemented behind each of the panels to record the full-field out-of-plane displacement of the panels. In addition, the panels were instrumented with foil strain gauges on the front skins to record the response of the panel side in contact with the blast. The results revealed that the combination of glass-and carbon-fibre improves the blast resilience when compared to previous blast testing on panels with exclusively glass-fibre or carbon-fibre skins. However, the order in which the glass-and carbon-fibre layers were arranged did not have a significant effect on the overall panel performance. In addition, panels with the same hybrid skins were subjected to high velocity impact testing. An aluminium projectile with 25 mm diameter was fired at small scale panels (160 × 160 mm) using a laboratory gas gun at a velocity of 78 ms−1. 3D DIC was again used to record the out-of-plane displacement of these panels. In contrast to the blast experiment, the impact results showed that the order in which glass-and carbon-fibres were arranged did affect both the out-of-plane displacement and damage to the panels. The least damage occurred when glass-fibre layers were placed on the outermost layers impacted by the projectile. Physics Arora Hari verfasserin aut Hooper Paul A. verfasserin aut Dear John P. verfasserin aut In EPJ Web of Conferences EDP Sciences, 2010 183, p 02003(2018) (DE-627)647306611 (DE-600)2595425-8 2100014X nnns volume:183, p 02003 year:2018 https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2100-014X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 183, p 02003 2018
allfieldsSound	10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 doi (DE-627)DOAJ057995850 (DE-599)DOAJ47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QC1-999 Rolfe Emily verfasserin aut Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Naval vessels may undergo high strain rate loading, including impact, wave slamming and blast loading. Predicting the behaviour of composite sandwich structures to such loading is complicated, hence representative experiments are required. Two panels with hybrid carbon-and glass-fibre skins were fabricated and subjected to full-scale air blast loading. The panels were 1.7 × 1.5 m in size and were subjected to a 100 kg nitromethane charge at a stand-off distance of 15 m. 3D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was implemented behind each of the panels to record the full-field out-of-plane displacement of the panels. In addition, the panels were instrumented with foil strain gauges on the front skins to record the response of the panel side in contact with the blast. The results revealed that the combination of glass-and carbon-fibre improves the blast resilience when compared to previous blast testing on panels with exclusively glass-fibre or carbon-fibre skins. However, the order in which the glass-and carbon-fibre layers were arranged did not have a significant effect on the overall panel performance. In addition, panels with the same hybrid skins were subjected to high velocity impact testing. An aluminium projectile with 25 mm diameter was fired at small scale panels (160 × 160 mm) using a laboratory gas gun at a velocity of 78 ms−1. 3D DIC was again used to record the out-of-plane displacement of these panels. In contrast to the blast experiment, the impact results showed that the order in which glass-and carbon-fibres were arranged did affect both the out-of-plane displacement and damage to the panels. The least damage occurred when glass-fibre layers were placed on the outermost layers impacted by the projectile. Physics Arora Hari verfasserin aut Hooper Paul A. verfasserin aut Dear John P. verfasserin aut In EPJ Web of Conferences EDP Sciences, 2010 183, p 02003(2018) (DE-627)647306611 (DE-600)2595425-8 2100014X nnns volume:183, p 02003 year:2018 https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7 kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2100-014X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 183, p 02003 2018
language	English
source	In EPJ Web of Conferences 183, p 02003(2018) volume:183, p 02003 year:2018
sourceStr	In EPJ Web of Conferences 183, p 02003(2018) volume:183, p 02003 year:2018
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Physics
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	EPJ Web of Conferences
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Rolfe Emily @@aut@@ Arora Hari @@aut@@ Hooper Paul A. @@aut@@ Dear John P. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	647306611
id	DOAJ057995850
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ057995850</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308222119.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1051/epjconf/201818302003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ057995850</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QC1-999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rolfe Emily</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Naval vessels may undergo high strain rate loading, including impact, wave slamming and blast loading. Predicting the behaviour of composite sandwich structures to such loading is complicated, hence representative experiments are required. Two panels with hybrid carbon-and glass-fibre skins were fabricated and subjected to full-scale air blast loading. The panels were 1.7 × 1.5 m in size and were subjected to a 100 kg nitromethane charge at a stand-off distance of 15 m. 3D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was implemented behind each of the panels to record the full-field out-of-plane displacement of the panels. In addition, the panels were instrumented with foil strain gauges on the front skins to record the response of the panel side in contact with the blast. The results revealed that the combination of glass-and carbon-fibre improves the blast resilience when compared to previous blast testing on panels with exclusively glass-fibre or carbon-fibre skins. However, the order in which the glass-and carbon-fibre layers were arranged did not have a significant effect on the overall panel performance. In addition, panels with the same hybrid skins were subjected to high velocity impact testing. An aluminium projectile with 25 mm diameter was fired at small scale panels (160 × 160 mm) using a laboratory gas gun at a velocity of 78 ms−1. 3D DIC was again used to record the out-of-plane displacement of these panels. In contrast to the blast experiment, the impact results showed that the order in which glass-and carbon-fibres were arranged did affect both the out-of-plane displacement and damage to the panels. The least damage occurred when glass-fibre layers were placed on the outermost layers impacted by the projectile.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Physics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arora Hari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hooper Paul A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dear John P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">EPJ Web of Conferences</subfield><subfield code="d">EDP Sciences, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">183, p 02003(2018)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)647306611</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2595425-8</subfield><subfield code="x">2100014X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:183, p 02003</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2100-014X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">183, p 02003</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	Q - Science
author	Rolfe Emily
spellingShingle	Rolfe Emily misc QC1-999 misc Physics Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading
authorStr	Rolfe Emily
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)647306611
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	QC1-999
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2100014X
topic_title	QC1-999 Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading
topic	misc QC1-999 misc Physics
topic_unstemmed	misc QC1-999 misc Physics
topic_browse	misc QC1-999 misc Physics
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	EPJ Web of Conferences
hierarchy_parent_id	647306611
hierarchy_top_title	EPJ Web of Conferences
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)647306611 (DE-600)2595425-8
title	Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ057995850 (DE-599)DOAJ47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7
title_full	Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading
author_sort	Rolfe Emily
journal	EPJ Web of Conferences
journalStr	EPJ Web of Conferences
callnumber-first-code	Q
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2018
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Rolfe Emily Arora Hari Hooper Paul A. Dear John P.
container_volume	183, p 02003
class	QC1-999
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Rolfe Emily
doi_str_mv	10.1051/epjconf/201818302003
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading
callnumber	QC1-999
title_auth	Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading
abstract	Naval vessels may undergo high strain rate loading, including impact, wave slamming and blast loading. Predicting the behaviour of composite sandwich structures to such loading is complicated, hence representative experiments are required. Two panels with hybrid carbon-and glass-fibre skins were fabricated and subjected to full-scale air blast loading. The panels were 1.7 × 1.5 m in size and were subjected to a 100 kg nitromethane charge at a stand-off distance of 15 m. 3D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was implemented behind each of the panels to record the full-field out-of-plane displacement of the panels. In addition, the panels were instrumented with foil strain gauges on the front skins to record the response of the panel side in contact with the blast. The results revealed that the combination of glass-and carbon-fibre improves the blast resilience when compared to previous blast testing on panels with exclusively glass-fibre or carbon-fibre skins. However, the order in which the glass-and carbon-fibre layers were arranged did not have a significant effect on the overall panel performance. In addition, panels with the same hybrid skins were subjected to high velocity impact testing. An aluminium projectile with 25 mm diameter was fired at small scale panels (160 × 160 mm) using a laboratory gas gun at a velocity of 78 ms−1. 3D DIC was again used to record the out-of-plane displacement of these panels. In contrast to the blast experiment, the impact results showed that the order in which glass-and carbon-fibres were arranged did affect both the out-of-plane displacement and damage to the panels. The least damage occurred when glass-fibre layers were placed on the outermost layers impacted by the projectile.
abstractGer	Naval vessels may undergo high strain rate loading, including impact, wave slamming and blast loading. Predicting the behaviour of composite sandwich structures to such loading is complicated, hence representative experiments are required. Two panels with hybrid carbon-and glass-fibre skins were fabricated and subjected to full-scale air blast loading. The panels were 1.7 × 1.5 m in size and were subjected to a 100 kg nitromethane charge at a stand-off distance of 15 m. 3D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was implemented behind each of the panels to record the full-field out-of-plane displacement of the panels. In addition, the panels were instrumented with foil strain gauges on the front skins to record the response of the panel side in contact with the blast. The results revealed that the combination of glass-and carbon-fibre improves the blast resilience when compared to previous blast testing on panels with exclusively glass-fibre or carbon-fibre skins. However, the order in which the glass-and carbon-fibre layers were arranged did not have a significant effect on the overall panel performance. In addition, panels with the same hybrid skins were subjected to high velocity impact testing. An aluminium projectile with 25 mm diameter was fired at small scale panels (160 × 160 mm) using a laboratory gas gun at a velocity of 78 ms−1. 3D DIC was again used to record the out-of-plane displacement of these panels. In contrast to the blast experiment, the impact results showed that the order in which glass-and carbon-fibres were arranged did affect both the out-of-plane displacement and damage to the panels. The least damage occurred when glass-fibre layers were placed on the outermost layers impacted by the projectile.
abstract_unstemmed	Naval vessels may undergo high strain rate loading, including impact, wave slamming and blast loading. Predicting the behaviour of composite sandwich structures to such loading is complicated, hence representative experiments are required. Two panels with hybrid carbon-and glass-fibre skins were fabricated and subjected to full-scale air blast loading. The panels were 1.7 × 1.5 m in size and were subjected to a 100 kg nitromethane charge at a stand-off distance of 15 m. 3D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was implemented behind each of the panels to record the full-field out-of-plane displacement of the panels. In addition, the panels were instrumented with foil strain gauges on the front skins to record the response of the panel side in contact with the blast. The results revealed that the combination of glass-and carbon-fibre improves the blast resilience when compared to previous blast testing on panels with exclusively glass-fibre or carbon-fibre skins. However, the order in which the glass-and carbon-fibre layers were arranged did not have a significant effect on the overall panel performance. In addition, panels with the same hybrid skins were subjected to high velocity impact testing. An aluminium projectile with 25 mm diameter was fired at small scale panels (160 × 160 mm) using a laboratory gas gun at a velocity of 78 ms−1. 3D DIC was again used to record the out-of-plane displacement of these panels. In contrast to the blast experiment, the impact results showed that the order in which glass-and carbon-fibres were arranged did affect both the out-of-plane displacement and damage to the panels. The least damage occurred when glass-fibre layers were placed on the outermost layers impacted by the projectile.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading
url	https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003 https://doaj.org/article/47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7 https://doaj.org/toc/2100-014X
remote_bool	true
author2	Arora Hari Hooper Paul A. Dear John P.
author2Str	Arora Hari Hooper Paul A. Dear John P.
ppnlink	647306611
callnumber-subject	QC - Physics
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1051/epjconf/201818302003
callnumber-a	QC1-999
up_date	2024-07-03T15:22:33.739Z
_version_	1803571852743802880
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ057995850</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308222119.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230227s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1051/epjconf/201818302003</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ057995850</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QC1-999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rolfe Emily</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Naval vessels may undergo high strain rate loading, including impact, wave slamming and blast loading. Predicting the behaviour of composite sandwich structures to such loading is complicated, hence representative experiments are required. Two panels with hybrid carbon-and glass-fibre skins were fabricated and subjected to full-scale air blast loading. The panels were 1.7 × 1.5 m in size and were subjected to a 100 kg nitromethane charge at a stand-off distance of 15 m. 3D Digital Image Correlation (DIC) was implemented behind each of the panels to record the full-field out-of-plane displacement of the panels. In addition, the panels were instrumented with foil strain gauges on the front skins to record the response of the panel side in contact with the blast. The results revealed that the combination of glass-and carbon-fibre improves the blast resilience when compared to previous blast testing on panels with exclusively glass-fibre or carbon-fibre skins. However, the order in which the glass-and carbon-fibre layers were arranged did not have a significant effect on the overall panel performance. In addition, panels with the same hybrid skins were subjected to high velocity impact testing. An aluminium projectile with 25 mm diameter was fired at small scale panels (160 × 160 mm) using a laboratory gas gun at a velocity of 78 ms−1. 3D DIC was again used to record the out-of-plane displacement of these panels. In contrast to the blast experiment, the impact results showed that the order in which glass-and carbon-fibres were arranged did affect both the out-of-plane displacement and damage to the panels. The least damage occurred when glass-fibre layers were placed on the outermost layers impacted by the projectile.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Physics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Arora Hari</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hooper Paul A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dear John P.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">EPJ Web of Conferences</subfield><subfield code="d">EDP Sciences, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">183, p 02003(2018)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)647306611</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2595425-8</subfield><subfield code="x">2100014X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:183, p 02003</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/47b7d46114564813a3714832db6702d7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818302003</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2100-014X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">183, p 02003</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3999043

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Hybrid composite sandwich panels under blast and impact loading

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?