Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA

Surprising scenarios can have different behavioural and neuronal consequences depending on the violation of the expectation. On the one hand, previous research has shown that the omission of a visual stimulus results in a robust cortical response representing that missing stimulus, a so-called negative prediction error. On the other hand, a large amount of studies revealed positive prediction error signals, entailing an increased neural response that can be attributed to the experience of a surprising, unexpected stimulus. However, there has been no evidence, so far, regarding how and when these prediction error signals co-occur. Here, we argue that the omission of an expected stimulus can and often does coincide with the appearance of an unexpected one. Therefore, we investigated whether positive and negative prediction error signals evoked by unpredicted cross-category stimulus transitions would temporally coincide during a speeded forced-choice fMRI paradigm. Foremost, our findings provide evidence of a behavioural effect regarding the facilitation of responses linked to expected stimuli. In addition, we obtained evidence for negative prediction error signals as seen in differential activation of FFA and PPA during unexpected place and face trials, respectively. Lastly, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed evidence for positive prediction error signals represented by context-dependent functional coupling between the right IFG and FFA or PPA, respectively, implicating a network that updates the internal representation after the appearance of an unexpected stimulus through involvement of this frontal area. The current results are consistent with a predictive coding account of cognition and underline the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations. Furthermore, our results put forward that positive and negative prediction error signalling can be directly linked to regions associated with the processing of different stimulus categories. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Lena M. Schliephake [verfasserIn] Ima Trempler [verfasserIn] Marlen A. Roehe [verfasserIn] Nina Heins [verfasserIn] Ricarda I. Schubotz [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	Prediction error Predictive coding Psychophysiological interaction Visual processing hierarchy fMRI

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: NeuroImage - Elsevier, 2020, 236(2021), Seite 118028-
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:236 ; year:2021 ; pages:118028-

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ058258078

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ058258078
003	DE-627
005	20230502083005.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ058258078
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJb4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RC321-571
100	0		\|a Lena M. Schliephake \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Surprising scenarios can have different behavioural and neuronal consequences depending on the violation of the expectation. On the one hand, previous research has shown that the omission of a visual stimulus results in a robust cortical response representing that missing stimulus, a so-called negative prediction error. On the other hand, a large amount of studies revealed positive prediction error signals, entailing an increased neural response that can be attributed to the experience of a surprising, unexpected stimulus. However, there has been no evidence, so far, regarding how and when these prediction error signals co-occur. Here, we argue that the omission of an expected stimulus can and often does coincide with the appearance of an unexpected one. Therefore, we investigated whether positive and negative prediction error signals evoked by unpredicted cross-category stimulus transitions would temporally coincide during a speeded forced-choice fMRI paradigm. Foremost, our findings provide evidence of a behavioural effect regarding the facilitation of responses linked to expected stimuli. In addition, we obtained evidence for negative prediction error signals as seen in differential activation of FFA and PPA during unexpected place and face trials, respectively. Lastly, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed evidence for positive prediction error signals represented by context-dependent functional coupling between the right IFG and FFA or PPA, respectively, implicating a network that updates the internal representation after the appearance of an unexpected stimulus through involvement of this frontal area. The current results are consistent with a predictive coding account of cognition and underline the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations. Furthermore, our results put forward that positive and negative prediction error signalling can be directly linked to regions associated with the processing of different stimulus categories.
650		4	\|a Prediction error
650		4	\|a Predictive coding
650		4	\|a Psychophysiological interaction
650		4	\|a Visual processing hierarchy
650		4	\|a fMRI
653		0	\|a Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
700	0		\|a Ima Trempler \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Marlen A. Roehe \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Nina Heins \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Ricarda I. Schubotz \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t NeuroImage \|d Elsevier, 2020 \|g 236(2021), Seite 118028- \|w (DE-627)268125503 \|w (DE-600)1471418-8 \|x 10959572 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:236 \|g year:2021 \|g pages:118028-
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/b4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003050 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1095-9572 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_165
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_224
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2004
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2025
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2034
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2048
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2064
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2106
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2122
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2143
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2152
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2153
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2232
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2336
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 236 \|j 2021 \|h 118028-

Indexfelder

author_variant	l m s lms i t it m a r mar n h nh r i s ris
matchkey_str	article:10959572:2021----::oiienngtvpeitoerrinltvoaeepcainofcadlcsiui
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
callnumber-subject-code	RC
publishDate	2021
allfields	10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 doi (DE-627)DOAJ058258078 (DE-599)DOAJb4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC321-571 Lena M. Schliephake verfasserin aut Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Surprising scenarios can have different behavioural and neuronal consequences depending on the violation of the expectation. On the one hand, previous research has shown that the omission of a visual stimulus results in a robust cortical response representing that missing stimulus, a so-called negative prediction error. On the other hand, a large amount of studies revealed positive prediction error signals, entailing an increased neural response that can be attributed to the experience of a surprising, unexpected stimulus. However, there has been no evidence, so far, regarding how and when these prediction error signals co-occur. Here, we argue that the omission of an expected stimulus can and often does coincide with the appearance of an unexpected one. Therefore, we investigated whether positive and negative prediction error signals evoked by unpredicted cross-category stimulus transitions would temporally coincide during a speeded forced-choice fMRI paradigm. Foremost, our findings provide evidence of a behavioural effect regarding the facilitation of responses linked to expected stimuli. In addition, we obtained evidence for negative prediction error signals as seen in differential activation of FFA and PPA during unexpected place and face trials, respectively. Lastly, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed evidence for positive prediction error signals represented by context-dependent functional coupling between the right IFG and FFA or PPA, respectively, implicating a network that updates the internal representation after the appearance of an unexpected stimulus through involvement of this frontal area. The current results are consistent with a predictive coding account of cognition and underline the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations. Furthermore, our results put forward that positive and negative prediction error signalling can be directly linked to regions associated with the processing of different stimulus categories. Prediction error Predictive coding Psychophysiological interaction Visual processing hierarchy fMRI Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Ima Trempler verfasserin aut Marlen A. Roehe verfasserin aut Nina Heins verfasserin aut Ricarda I. Schubotz verfasserin aut In NeuroImage Elsevier, 2020 236(2021), Seite 118028- (DE-627)268125503 (DE-600)1471418-8 10959572 nnns volume:236 year:2021 pages:118028- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003050 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1095-9572 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 236 2021 118028-
spelling	10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 doi (DE-627)DOAJ058258078 (DE-599)DOAJb4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC321-571 Lena M. Schliephake verfasserin aut Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Surprising scenarios can have different behavioural and neuronal consequences depending on the violation of the expectation. On the one hand, previous research has shown that the omission of a visual stimulus results in a robust cortical response representing that missing stimulus, a so-called negative prediction error. On the other hand, a large amount of studies revealed positive prediction error signals, entailing an increased neural response that can be attributed to the experience of a surprising, unexpected stimulus. However, there has been no evidence, so far, regarding how and when these prediction error signals co-occur. Here, we argue that the omission of an expected stimulus can and often does coincide with the appearance of an unexpected one. Therefore, we investigated whether positive and negative prediction error signals evoked by unpredicted cross-category stimulus transitions would temporally coincide during a speeded forced-choice fMRI paradigm. Foremost, our findings provide evidence of a behavioural effect regarding the facilitation of responses linked to expected stimuli. In addition, we obtained evidence for negative prediction error signals as seen in differential activation of FFA and PPA during unexpected place and face trials, respectively. Lastly, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed evidence for positive prediction error signals represented by context-dependent functional coupling between the right IFG and FFA or PPA, respectively, implicating a network that updates the internal representation after the appearance of an unexpected stimulus through involvement of this frontal area. The current results are consistent with a predictive coding account of cognition and underline the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations. Furthermore, our results put forward that positive and negative prediction error signalling can be directly linked to regions associated with the processing of different stimulus categories. Prediction error Predictive coding Psychophysiological interaction Visual processing hierarchy fMRI Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Ima Trempler verfasserin aut Marlen A. Roehe verfasserin aut Nina Heins verfasserin aut Ricarda I. Schubotz verfasserin aut In NeuroImage Elsevier, 2020 236(2021), Seite 118028- (DE-627)268125503 (DE-600)1471418-8 10959572 nnns volume:236 year:2021 pages:118028- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003050 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1095-9572 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 236 2021 118028-
allfields_unstemmed	10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 doi (DE-627)DOAJ058258078 (DE-599)DOAJb4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC321-571 Lena M. Schliephake verfasserin aut Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Surprising scenarios can have different behavioural and neuronal consequences depending on the violation of the expectation. On the one hand, previous research has shown that the omission of a visual stimulus results in a robust cortical response representing that missing stimulus, a so-called negative prediction error. On the other hand, a large amount of studies revealed positive prediction error signals, entailing an increased neural response that can be attributed to the experience of a surprising, unexpected stimulus. However, there has been no evidence, so far, regarding how and when these prediction error signals co-occur. Here, we argue that the omission of an expected stimulus can and often does coincide with the appearance of an unexpected one. Therefore, we investigated whether positive and negative prediction error signals evoked by unpredicted cross-category stimulus transitions would temporally coincide during a speeded forced-choice fMRI paradigm. Foremost, our findings provide evidence of a behavioural effect regarding the facilitation of responses linked to expected stimuli. In addition, we obtained evidence for negative prediction error signals as seen in differential activation of FFA and PPA during unexpected place and face trials, respectively. Lastly, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed evidence for positive prediction error signals represented by context-dependent functional coupling between the right IFG and FFA or PPA, respectively, implicating a network that updates the internal representation after the appearance of an unexpected stimulus through involvement of this frontal area. The current results are consistent with a predictive coding account of cognition and underline the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations. Furthermore, our results put forward that positive and negative prediction error signalling can be directly linked to regions associated with the processing of different stimulus categories. Prediction error Predictive coding Psychophysiological interaction Visual processing hierarchy fMRI Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Ima Trempler verfasserin aut Marlen A. Roehe verfasserin aut Nina Heins verfasserin aut Ricarda I. Schubotz verfasserin aut In NeuroImage Elsevier, 2020 236(2021), Seite 118028- (DE-627)268125503 (DE-600)1471418-8 10959572 nnns volume:236 year:2021 pages:118028- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003050 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1095-9572 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 236 2021 118028-
allfieldsGer	10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 doi (DE-627)DOAJ058258078 (DE-599)DOAJb4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC321-571 Lena M. Schliephake verfasserin aut Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Surprising scenarios can have different behavioural and neuronal consequences depending on the violation of the expectation. On the one hand, previous research has shown that the omission of a visual stimulus results in a robust cortical response representing that missing stimulus, a so-called negative prediction error. On the other hand, a large amount of studies revealed positive prediction error signals, entailing an increased neural response that can be attributed to the experience of a surprising, unexpected stimulus. However, there has been no evidence, so far, regarding how and when these prediction error signals co-occur. Here, we argue that the omission of an expected stimulus can and often does coincide with the appearance of an unexpected one. Therefore, we investigated whether positive and negative prediction error signals evoked by unpredicted cross-category stimulus transitions would temporally coincide during a speeded forced-choice fMRI paradigm. Foremost, our findings provide evidence of a behavioural effect regarding the facilitation of responses linked to expected stimuli. In addition, we obtained evidence for negative prediction error signals as seen in differential activation of FFA and PPA during unexpected place and face trials, respectively. Lastly, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed evidence for positive prediction error signals represented by context-dependent functional coupling between the right IFG and FFA or PPA, respectively, implicating a network that updates the internal representation after the appearance of an unexpected stimulus through involvement of this frontal area. The current results are consistent with a predictive coding account of cognition and underline the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations. Furthermore, our results put forward that positive and negative prediction error signalling can be directly linked to regions associated with the processing of different stimulus categories. Prediction error Predictive coding Psychophysiological interaction Visual processing hierarchy fMRI Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Ima Trempler verfasserin aut Marlen A. Roehe verfasserin aut Nina Heins verfasserin aut Ricarda I. Schubotz verfasserin aut In NeuroImage Elsevier, 2020 236(2021), Seite 118028- (DE-627)268125503 (DE-600)1471418-8 10959572 nnns volume:236 year:2021 pages:118028- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003050 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1095-9572 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 236 2021 118028-
allfieldsSound	10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 doi (DE-627)DOAJ058258078 (DE-599)DOAJb4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC321-571 Lena M. Schliephake verfasserin aut Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Surprising scenarios can have different behavioural and neuronal consequences depending on the violation of the expectation. On the one hand, previous research has shown that the omission of a visual stimulus results in a robust cortical response representing that missing stimulus, a so-called negative prediction error. On the other hand, a large amount of studies revealed positive prediction error signals, entailing an increased neural response that can be attributed to the experience of a surprising, unexpected stimulus. However, there has been no evidence, so far, regarding how and when these prediction error signals co-occur. Here, we argue that the omission of an expected stimulus can and often does coincide with the appearance of an unexpected one. Therefore, we investigated whether positive and negative prediction error signals evoked by unpredicted cross-category stimulus transitions would temporally coincide during a speeded forced-choice fMRI paradigm. Foremost, our findings provide evidence of a behavioural effect regarding the facilitation of responses linked to expected stimuli. In addition, we obtained evidence for negative prediction error signals as seen in differential activation of FFA and PPA during unexpected place and face trials, respectively. Lastly, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed evidence for positive prediction error signals represented by context-dependent functional coupling between the right IFG and FFA or PPA, respectively, implicating a network that updates the internal representation after the appearance of an unexpected stimulus through involvement of this frontal area. The current results are consistent with a predictive coding account of cognition and underline the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations. Furthermore, our results put forward that positive and negative prediction error signalling can be directly linked to regions associated with the processing of different stimulus categories. Prediction error Predictive coding Psychophysiological interaction Visual processing hierarchy fMRI Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Ima Trempler verfasserin aut Marlen A. Roehe verfasserin aut Nina Heins verfasserin aut Ricarda I. Schubotz verfasserin aut In NeuroImage Elsevier, 2020 236(2021), Seite 118028- (DE-627)268125503 (DE-600)1471418-8 10959572 nnns volume:236 year:2021 pages:118028- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003050 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1095-9572 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 236 2021 118028-
language	English
source	In NeuroImage 236(2021), Seite 118028- volume:236 year:2021 pages:118028-
sourceStr	In NeuroImage 236(2021), Seite 118028- volume:236 year:2021 pages:118028-
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Prediction error Predictive coding Psychophysiological interaction Visual processing hierarchy fMRI Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	NeuroImage
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Lena M. Schliephake @@aut@@ Ima Trempler @@aut@@ Marlen A. Roehe @@aut@@ Nina Heins @@aut@@ Ricarda I. Schubotz @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	268125503
id	DOAJ058258078
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ058258078</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502083005.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ058258078</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC321-571</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lena M. Schliephake</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Surprising scenarios can have different behavioural and neuronal consequences depending on the violation of the expectation. On the one hand, previous research has shown that the omission of a visual stimulus results in a robust cortical response representing that missing stimulus, a so-called negative prediction error. On the other hand, a large amount of studies revealed positive prediction error signals, entailing an increased neural response that can be attributed to the experience of a surprising, unexpected stimulus. However, there has been no evidence, so far, regarding how and when these prediction error signals co-occur. Here, we argue that the omission of an expected stimulus can and often does coincide with the appearance of an unexpected one. Therefore, we investigated whether positive and negative prediction error signals evoked by unpredicted cross-category stimulus transitions would temporally coincide during a speeded forced-choice fMRI paradigm. Foremost, our findings provide evidence of a behavioural effect regarding the facilitation of responses linked to expected stimuli. In addition, we obtained evidence for negative prediction error signals as seen in differential activation of FFA and PPA during unexpected place and face trials, respectively. Lastly, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed evidence for positive prediction error signals represented by context-dependent functional coupling between the right IFG and FFA or PPA, respectively, implicating a network that updates the internal representation after the appearance of an unexpected stimulus through involvement of this frontal area. The current results are consistent with a predictive coding account of cognition and underline the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations. Furthermore, our results put forward that positive and negative prediction error signalling can be directly linked to regions associated with the processing of different stimulus categories.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prediction error</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Predictive coding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Psychophysiological interaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Visual processing hierarchy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">fMRI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ima Trempler</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marlen A. Roehe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nina Heins</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ricarda I. Schubotz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">NeuroImage</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">236(2021), Seite 118028-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)268125503</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1471418-8</subfield><subfield code="x">10959572</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:236</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:118028-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003050</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1095-9572</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">236</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">118028-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Lena M. Schliephake
spellingShingle	Lena M. Schliephake misc RC321-571 misc Prediction error misc Predictive coding misc Psychophysiological interaction misc Visual processing hierarchy misc fMRI misc Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA
authorStr	Lena M. Schliephake
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)268125503
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RC321-571
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	10959572
topic_title	RC321-571 Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA Prediction error Predictive coding Psychophysiological interaction Visual processing hierarchy fMRI
topic	misc RC321-571 misc Prediction error misc Predictive coding misc Psychophysiological interaction misc Visual processing hierarchy misc fMRI misc Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
topic_unstemmed	misc RC321-571 misc Prediction error misc Predictive coding misc Psychophysiological interaction misc Visual processing hierarchy misc fMRI misc Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
topic_browse	misc RC321-571 misc Prediction error misc Predictive coding misc Psychophysiological interaction misc Visual processing hierarchy misc fMRI misc Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	NeuroImage
hierarchy_parent_id	268125503
hierarchy_top_title	NeuroImage
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)268125503 (DE-600)1471418-8
title	Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ058258078 (DE-599)DOAJb4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2
title_full	Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA
author_sort	Lena M. Schliephake
journal	NeuroImage
journalStr	NeuroImage
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	118028
author_browse	Lena M. Schliephake Ima Trempler Marlen A. Roehe Nina Heins Ricarda I. Schubotz
container_volume	236
class	RC321-571
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Lena M. Schliephake
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate ffa and ppa
callnumber	RC321-571
title_auth	Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA
abstract	Surprising scenarios can have different behavioural and neuronal consequences depending on the violation of the expectation. On the one hand, previous research has shown that the omission of a visual stimulus results in a robust cortical response representing that missing stimulus, a so-called negative prediction error. On the other hand, a large amount of studies revealed positive prediction error signals, entailing an increased neural response that can be attributed to the experience of a surprising, unexpected stimulus. However, there has been no evidence, so far, regarding how and when these prediction error signals co-occur. Here, we argue that the omission of an expected stimulus can and often does coincide with the appearance of an unexpected one. Therefore, we investigated whether positive and negative prediction error signals evoked by unpredicted cross-category stimulus transitions would temporally coincide during a speeded forced-choice fMRI paradigm. Foremost, our findings provide evidence of a behavioural effect regarding the facilitation of responses linked to expected stimuli. In addition, we obtained evidence for negative prediction error signals as seen in differential activation of FFA and PPA during unexpected place and face trials, respectively. Lastly, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed evidence for positive prediction error signals represented by context-dependent functional coupling between the right IFG and FFA or PPA, respectively, implicating a network that updates the internal representation after the appearance of an unexpected stimulus through involvement of this frontal area. The current results are consistent with a predictive coding account of cognition and underline the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations. Furthermore, our results put forward that positive and negative prediction error signalling can be directly linked to regions associated with the processing of different stimulus categories.
abstractGer	Surprising scenarios can have different behavioural and neuronal consequences depending on the violation of the expectation. On the one hand, previous research has shown that the omission of a visual stimulus results in a robust cortical response representing that missing stimulus, a so-called negative prediction error. On the other hand, a large amount of studies revealed positive prediction error signals, entailing an increased neural response that can be attributed to the experience of a surprising, unexpected stimulus. However, there has been no evidence, so far, regarding how and when these prediction error signals co-occur. Here, we argue that the omission of an expected stimulus can and often does coincide with the appearance of an unexpected one. Therefore, we investigated whether positive and negative prediction error signals evoked by unpredicted cross-category stimulus transitions would temporally coincide during a speeded forced-choice fMRI paradigm. Foremost, our findings provide evidence of a behavioural effect regarding the facilitation of responses linked to expected stimuli. In addition, we obtained evidence for negative prediction error signals as seen in differential activation of FFA and PPA during unexpected place and face trials, respectively. Lastly, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed evidence for positive prediction error signals represented by context-dependent functional coupling between the right IFG and FFA or PPA, respectively, implicating a network that updates the internal representation after the appearance of an unexpected stimulus through involvement of this frontal area. The current results are consistent with a predictive coding account of cognition and underline the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations. Furthermore, our results put forward that positive and negative prediction error signalling can be directly linked to regions associated with the processing of different stimulus categories.
abstract_unstemmed	Surprising scenarios can have different behavioural and neuronal consequences depending on the violation of the expectation. On the one hand, previous research has shown that the omission of a visual stimulus results in a robust cortical response representing that missing stimulus, a so-called negative prediction error. On the other hand, a large amount of studies revealed positive prediction error signals, entailing an increased neural response that can be attributed to the experience of a surprising, unexpected stimulus. However, there has been no evidence, so far, regarding how and when these prediction error signals co-occur. Here, we argue that the omission of an expected stimulus can and often does coincide with the appearance of an unexpected one. Therefore, we investigated whether positive and negative prediction error signals evoked by unpredicted cross-category stimulus transitions would temporally coincide during a speeded forced-choice fMRI paradigm. Foremost, our findings provide evidence of a behavioural effect regarding the facilitation of responses linked to expected stimuli. In addition, we obtained evidence for negative prediction error signals as seen in differential activation of FFA and PPA during unexpected place and face trials, respectively. Lastly, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed evidence for positive prediction error signals represented by context-dependent functional coupling between the right IFG and FFA or PPA, respectively, implicating a network that updates the internal representation after the appearance of an unexpected stimulus through involvement of this frontal area. The current results are consistent with a predictive coding account of cognition and underline the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations. Furthermore, our results put forward that positive and negative prediction error signalling can be directly linked to regions associated with the processing of different stimulus categories.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_165 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA
url	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028 https://doaj.org/article/b4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003050 https://doaj.org/toc/1095-9572
remote_bool	true
author2	Ima Trempler Marlen A. Roehe Nina Heins Ricarda I. Schubotz
author2Str	Ima Trempler Marlen A. Roehe Nina Heins Ricarda I. Schubotz
ppnlink	268125503
callnumber-subject	RC - Internal Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028
callnumber-a	RC321-571
up_date	2024-07-03T16:55:48.933Z
_version_	1803577719713169408
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ058258078</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502083005.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ058258078</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC321-571</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lena M. Schliephake</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Surprising scenarios can have different behavioural and neuronal consequences depending on the violation of the expectation. On the one hand, previous research has shown that the omission of a visual stimulus results in a robust cortical response representing that missing stimulus, a so-called negative prediction error. On the other hand, a large amount of studies revealed positive prediction error signals, entailing an increased neural response that can be attributed to the experience of a surprising, unexpected stimulus. However, there has been no evidence, so far, regarding how and when these prediction error signals co-occur. Here, we argue that the omission of an expected stimulus can and often does coincide with the appearance of an unexpected one. Therefore, we investigated whether positive and negative prediction error signals evoked by unpredicted cross-category stimulus transitions would temporally coincide during a speeded forced-choice fMRI paradigm. Foremost, our findings provide evidence of a behavioural effect regarding the facilitation of responses linked to expected stimuli. In addition, we obtained evidence for negative prediction error signals as seen in differential activation of FFA and PPA during unexpected place and face trials, respectively. Lastly, a psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed evidence for positive prediction error signals represented by context-dependent functional coupling between the right IFG and FFA or PPA, respectively, implicating a network that updates the internal representation after the appearance of an unexpected stimulus through involvement of this frontal area. The current results are consistent with a predictive coding account of cognition and underline the importance of considering the potential dual nature of expectation violations. Furthermore, our results put forward that positive and negative prediction error signalling can be directly linked to regions associated with the processing of different stimulus categories.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Prediction error</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Predictive coding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Psychophysiological interaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Visual processing hierarchy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">fMRI</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ima Trempler</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marlen A. Roehe</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nina Heins</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ricarda I. Schubotz</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">NeuroImage</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2020</subfield><subfield code="g">236(2021), Seite 118028-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)268125503</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)1471418-8</subfield><subfield code="x">10959572</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:236</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:118028-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118028</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b4fd7bb8db424167bb1d1079e4625ba2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811921003050</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1095-9572</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_165</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">236</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">118028-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.398197

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Positive and negative prediction error signals to violated expectations of face and place stimuli distinctively activate FFA and PPA

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?