Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women?

Abstract Background This study compares the management and outcome of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in HIV-positive and -negative women and identifies risk factors for treatment failure. Methods This retrospective, controlled study includes 146 HIV-positive women, matched for HSIL, age and year of diagnosis, with 146 HIV-negative women. Differences were analysed using parametric and non-parametric tests and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for treatment failure. Results Persistence of cervical disease was observed most frequently in HIV-positive women (42 versus 17%) (p < 0.001) and the cone biopsy margins were more often invaded in HIV-positive-women than in HIV-negative ones. (37 versus 16%; p < 0.05). HIV-positive women, with successful cervical treatment had better HIV disease control: with significantly longer periods of undetectable HIV viral loads (VL) (19 versus 5 months; p < 0.001) and higher CD4 counts (491 versus 320 cells/mm3; p < 0.001). HIV-positive women with detectable VL at the time of dysplasia had 3.5 times (95% IC: 1.5–8.3) increased risk of treatment failure. Being treated through ablative therapy was associated with a 7.4, four-fold (95% IC: 3.2–17.3) increased risk of treatment failure compared to conization Conclusion HIV-positive women have a higher risk of treatment failure of HSIL than do HIV-negative women, especially when ablative therapy is used and in women with poor control of their HIV infection. The management and the follow- up of HSIL’s guidelines in this high-risk population should be adapted consequently: for HIV-positive women with uncontrolled viral load, excisional treatment should be the preferred therapy, whereas for women with undetectable viral load, CD4 + lymphocytes higher than 500 cells/mm3 and with a desire of pregnancy, ablative therapy may be considered. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Christine Gilles [verfasserIn] Maude Velghe-lenelle [verfasserIn] Yannick Manigart [verfasserIn] Déborah Konopnicki [verfasserIn] Serge Rozenberg [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	HIV HSIL Treatment failure CIN

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: AIDS Research and Therapy - BMC, 2004, 18(2021), 1, Seite 11
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:18 ; year:2021 ; number:1 ; pages:11

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ058528709

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ058528709
003	DE-627
005	20230308225028.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ058528709
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJe34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RC581-607
100	0		\|a Christine Gilles \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women?
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Abstract Background This study compares the management and outcome of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in HIV-positive and -negative women and identifies risk factors for treatment failure. Methods This retrospective, controlled study includes 146 HIV-positive women, matched for HSIL, age and year of diagnosis, with 146 HIV-negative women. Differences were analysed using parametric and non-parametric tests and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for treatment failure. Results Persistence of cervical disease was observed most frequently in HIV-positive women (42 versus 17%) (p < 0.001) and the cone biopsy margins were more often invaded in HIV-positive-women than in HIV-negative ones. (37 versus 16%; p < 0.05). HIV-positive women, with successful cervical treatment had better HIV disease control: with significantly longer periods of undetectable HIV viral loads (VL) (19 versus 5 months; p < 0.001) and higher CD4 counts (491 versus 320 cells/mm3; p < 0.001). HIV-positive women with detectable VL at the time of dysplasia had 3.5 times (95% IC: 1.5–8.3) increased risk of treatment failure. Being treated through ablative therapy was associated with a 7.4, four-fold (95% IC: 3.2–17.3) increased risk of treatment failure compared to conization Conclusion HIV-positive women have a higher risk of treatment failure of HSIL than do HIV-negative women, especially when ablative therapy is used and in women with poor control of their HIV infection. The management and the follow- up of HSIL’s guidelines in this high-risk population should be adapted consequently: for HIV-positive women with uncontrolled viral load, excisional treatment should be the preferred therapy, whereas for women with undetectable viral load, CD4 + lymphocytes higher than 500 cells/mm3 and with a desire of pregnancy, ablative therapy may be considered.
650		4	\|a HIV
650		4	\|a HSIL
650		4	\|a Treatment failure
650		4	\|a CIN
653		0	\|a Immunologic diseases. Allergy
700	0		\|a Maude Velghe-lenelle \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Yannick Manigart \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Déborah Konopnicki \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Serge Rozenberg \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t AIDS Research and Therapy \|d BMC, 2004 \|g 18(2021), 1, Seite 11 \|w (DE-627)477528538 \|w (DE-600)2173450-1 \|x 17426405 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:18 \|g year:2021 \|g number:1 \|g pages:11
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/e34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1742-6405 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 18 \|j 2021 \|e 1 \|h 11

Indexfelder

author_variant	c g cg m v l mvl y m ym d k dk s r sr
matchkey_str	article:17426405:2021----::hudhmngmnohggaeevclqaosnreihlalsohibd
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
callnumber-subject-code	RC
publishDate	2021
allfields	10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x doi (DE-627)DOAJ058528709 (DE-599)DOAJe34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-607 Christine Gilles verfasserin aut Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women? 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background This study compares the management and outcome of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in HIV-positive and -negative women and identifies risk factors for treatment failure. Methods This retrospective, controlled study includes 146 HIV-positive women, matched for HSIL, age and year of diagnosis, with 146 HIV-negative women. Differences were analysed using parametric and non-parametric tests and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for treatment failure. Results Persistence of cervical disease was observed most frequently in HIV-positive women (42 versus 17%) (p < 0.001) and the cone biopsy margins were more often invaded in HIV-positive-women than in HIV-negative ones. (37 versus 16%; p < 0.05). HIV-positive women, with successful cervical treatment had better HIV disease control: with significantly longer periods of undetectable HIV viral loads (VL) (19 versus 5 months; p < 0.001) and higher CD4 counts (491 versus 320 cells/mm3; p < 0.001). HIV-positive women with detectable VL at the time of dysplasia had 3.5 times (95% IC: 1.5–8.3) increased risk of treatment failure. Being treated through ablative therapy was associated with a 7.4, four-fold (95% IC: 3.2–17.3) increased risk of treatment failure compared to conization Conclusion HIV-positive women have a higher risk of treatment failure of HSIL than do HIV-negative women, especially when ablative therapy is used and in women with poor control of their HIV infection. The management and the follow- up of HSIL’s guidelines in this high-risk population should be adapted consequently: for HIV-positive women with uncontrolled viral load, excisional treatment should be the preferred therapy, whereas for women with undetectable viral load, CD4 + lymphocytes higher than 500 cells/mm3 and with a desire of pregnancy, ablative therapy may be considered. HIV HSIL Treatment failure CIN Immunologic diseases. Allergy Maude Velghe-lenelle verfasserin aut Yannick Manigart verfasserin aut Déborah Konopnicki verfasserin aut Serge Rozenberg verfasserin aut In AIDS Research and Therapy BMC, 2004 18(2021), 1, Seite 11 (DE-627)477528538 (DE-600)2173450-1 17426405 nnns volume:18 year:2021 number:1 pages:11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1742-6405 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2021 1 11
spelling	10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x doi (DE-627)DOAJ058528709 (DE-599)DOAJe34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-607 Christine Gilles verfasserin aut Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women? 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background This study compares the management and outcome of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in HIV-positive and -negative women and identifies risk factors for treatment failure. Methods This retrospective, controlled study includes 146 HIV-positive women, matched for HSIL, age and year of diagnosis, with 146 HIV-negative women. Differences were analysed using parametric and non-parametric tests and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for treatment failure. Results Persistence of cervical disease was observed most frequently in HIV-positive women (42 versus 17%) (p < 0.001) and the cone biopsy margins were more often invaded in HIV-positive-women than in HIV-negative ones. (37 versus 16%; p < 0.05). HIV-positive women, with successful cervical treatment had better HIV disease control: with significantly longer periods of undetectable HIV viral loads (VL) (19 versus 5 months; p < 0.001) and higher CD4 counts (491 versus 320 cells/mm3; p < 0.001). HIV-positive women with detectable VL at the time of dysplasia had 3.5 times (95% IC: 1.5–8.3) increased risk of treatment failure. Being treated through ablative therapy was associated with a 7.4, four-fold (95% IC: 3.2–17.3) increased risk of treatment failure compared to conization Conclusion HIV-positive women have a higher risk of treatment failure of HSIL than do HIV-negative women, especially when ablative therapy is used and in women with poor control of their HIV infection. The management and the follow- up of HSIL’s guidelines in this high-risk population should be adapted consequently: for HIV-positive women with uncontrolled viral load, excisional treatment should be the preferred therapy, whereas for women with undetectable viral load, CD4 + lymphocytes higher than 500 cells/mm3 and with a desire of pregnancy, ablative therapy may be considered. HIV HSIL Treatment failure CIN Immunologic diseases. Allergy Maude Velghe-lenelle verfasserin aut Yannick Manigart verfasserin aut Déborah Konopnicki verfasserin aut Serge Rozenberg verfasserin aut In AIDS Research and Therapy BMC, 2004 18(2021), 1, Seite 11 (DE-627)477528538 (DE-600)2173450-1 17426405 nnns volume:18 year:2021 number:1 pages:11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1742-6405 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2021 1 11
allfields_unstemmed	10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x doi (DE-627)DOAJ058528709 (DE-599)DOAJe34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-607 Christine Gilles verfasserin aut Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women? 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background This study compares the management and outcome of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in HIV-positive and -negative women and identifies risk factors for treatment failure. Methods This retrospective, controlled study includes 146 HIV-positive women, matched for HSIL, age and year of diagnosis, with 146 HIV-negative women. Differences were analysed using parametric and non-parametric tests and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for treatment failure. Results Persistence of cervical disease was observed most frequently in HIV-positive women (42 versus 17%) (p < 0.001) and the cone biopsy margins were more often invaded in HIV-positive-women than in HIV-negative ones. (37 versus 16%; p < 0.05). HIV-positive women, with successful cervical treatment had better HIV disease control: with significantly longer periods of undetectable HIV viral loads (VL) (19 versus 5 months; p < 0.001) and higher CD4 counts (491 versus 320 cells/mm3; p < 0.001). HIV-positive women with detectable VL at the time of dysplasia had 3.5 times (95% IC: 1.5–8.3) increased risk of treatment failure. Being treated through ablative therapy was associated with a 7.4, four-fold (95% IC: 3.2–17.3) increased risk of treatment failure compared to conization Conclusion HIV-positive women have a higher risk of treatment failure of HSIL than do HIV-negative women, especially when ablative therapy is used and in women with poor control of their HIV infection. The management and the follow- up of HSIL’s guidelines in this high-risk population should be adapted consequently: for HIV-positive women with uncontrolled viral load, excisional treatment should be the preferred therapy, whereas for women with undetectable viral load, CD4 + lymphocytes higher than 500 cells/mm3 and with a desire of pregnancy, ablative therapy may be considered. HIV HSIL Treatment failure CIN Immunologic diseases. Allergy Maude Velghe-lenelle verfasserin aut Yannick Manigart verfasserin aut Déborah Konopnicki verfasserin aut Serge Rozenberg verfasserin aut In AIDS Research and Therapy BMC, 2004 18(2021), 1, Seite 11 (DE-627)477528538 (DE-600)2173450-1 17426405 nnns volume:18 year:2021 number:1 pages:11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1742-6405 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2021 1 11
allfieldsGer	10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x doi (DE-627)DOAJ058528709 (DE-599)DOAJe34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-607 Christine Gilles verfasserin aut Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women? 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background This study compares the management and outcome of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in HIV-positive and -negative women and identifies risk factors for treatment failure. Methods This retrospective, controlled study includes 146 HIV-positive women, matched for HSIL, age and year of diagnosis, with 146 HIV-negative women. Differences were analysed using parametric and non-parametric tests and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for treatment failure. Results Persistence of cervical disease was observed most frequently in HIV-positive women (42 versus 17%) (p < 0.001) and the cone biopsy margins were more often invaded in HIV-positive-women than in HIV-negative ones. (37 versus 16%; p < 0.05). HIV-positive women, with successful cervical treatment had better HIV disease control: with significantly longer periods of undetectable HIV viral loads (VL) (19 versus 5 months; p < 0.001) and higher CD4 counts (491 versus 320 cells/mm3; p < 0.001). HIV-positive women with detectable VL at the time of dysplasia had 3.5 times (95% IC: 1.5–8.3) increased risk of treatment failure. Being treated through ablative therapy was associated with a 7.4, four-fold (95% IC: 3.2–17.3) increased risk of treatment failure compared to conization Conclusion HIV-positive women have a higher risk of treatment failure of HSIL than do HIV-negative women, especially when ablative therapy is used and in women with poor control of their HIV infection. The management and the follow- up of HSIL’s guidelines in this high-risk population should be adapted consequently: for HIV-positive women with uncontrolled viral load, excisional treatment should be the preferred therapy, whereas for women with undetectable viral load, CD4 + lymphocytes higher than 500 cells/mm3 and with a desire of pregnancy, ablative therapy may be considered. HIV HSIL Treatment failure CIN Immunologic diseases. Allergy Maude Velghe-lenelle verfasserin aut Yannick Manigart verfasserin aut Déborah Konopnicki verfasserin aut Serge Rozenberg verfasserin aut In AIDS Research and Therapy BMC, 2004 18(2021), 1, Seite 11 (DE-627)477528538 (DE-600)2173450-1 17426405 nnns volume:18 year:2021 number:1 pages:11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1742-6405 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2021 1 11
allfieldsSound	10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x doi (DE-627)DOAJ058528709 (DE-599)DOAJe34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-607 Christine Gilles verfasserin aut Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women? 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background This study compares the management and outcome of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in HIV-positive and -negative women and identifies risk factors for treatment failure. Methods This retrospective, controlled study includes 146 HIV-positive women, matched for HSIL, age and year of diagnosis, with 146 HIV-negative women. Differences were analysed using parametric and non-parametric tests and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for treatment failure. Results Persistence of cervical disease was observed most frequently in HIV-positive women (42 versus 17%) (p < 0.001) and the cone biopsy margins were more often invaded in HIV-positive-women than in HIV-negative ones. (37 versus 16%; p < 0.05). HIV-positive women, with successful cervical treatment had better HIV disease control: with significantly longer periods of undetectable HIV viral loads (VL) (19 versus 5 months; p < 0.001) and higher CD4 counts (491 versus 320 cells/mm3; p < 0.001). HIV-positive women with detectable VL at the time of dysplasia had 3.5 times (95% IC: 1.5–8.3) increased risk of treatment failure. Being treated through ablative therapy was associated with a 7.4, four-fold (95% IC: 3.2–17.3) increased risk of treatment failure compared to conization Conclusion HIV-positive women have a higher risk of treatment failure of HSIL than do HIV-negative women, especially when ablative therapy is used and in women with poor control of their HIV infection. The management and the follow- up of HSIL’s guidelines in this high-risk population should be adapted consequently: for HIV-positive women with uncontrolled viral load, excisional treatment should be the preferred therapy, whereas for women with undetectable viral load, CD4 + lymphocytes higher than 500 cells/mm3 and with a desire of pregnancy, ablative therapy may be considered. HIV HSIL Treatment failure CIN Immunologic diseases. Allergy Maude Velghe-lenelle verfasserin aut Yannick Manigart verfasserin aut Déborah Konopnicki verfasserin aut Serge Rozenberg verfasserin aut In AIDS Research and Therapy BMC, 2004 18(2021), 1, Seite 11 (DE-627)477528538 (DE-600)2173450-1 17426405 nnns volume:18 year:2021 number:1 pages:11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1742-6405 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 18 2021 1 11
language	English
source	In AIDS Research and Therapy 18(2021), 1, Seite 11 volume:18 year:2021 number:1 pages:11
sourceStr	In AIDS Research and Therapy 18(2021), 1, Seite 11 volume:18 year:2021 number:1 pages:11
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	HIV HSIL Treatment failure CIN Immunologic diseases. Allergy
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	AIDS Research and Therapy
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Christine Gilles @@aut@@ Maude Velghe-lenelle @@aut@@ Yannick Manigart @@aut@@ Déborah Konopnicki @@aut@@ Serge Rozenberg @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	477528538
id	DOAJ058528709
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ058528709</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308225028.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ058528709</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJe34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC581-607</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Christine Gilles</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Background This study compares the management and outcome of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in HIV-positive and -negative women and identifies risk factors for treatment failure. Methods This retrospective, controlled study includes 146 HIV-positive women, matched for HSIL, age and year of diagnosis, with 146 HIV-negative women. Differences were analysed using parametric and non-parametric tests and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for treatment failure. Results Persistence of cervical disease was observed most frequently in HIV-positive women (42 versus 17%) (p < 0.001) and the cone biopsy margins were more often invaded in HIV-positive-women than in HIV-negative ones. (37 versus 16%; p < 0.05). HIV-positive women, with successful cervical treatment had better HIV disease control: with significantly longer periods of undetectable HIV viral loads (VL) (19 versus 5 months; p < 0.001) and higher CD4 counts (491 versus 320 cells/mm3; p < 0.001). HIV-positive women with detectable VL at the time of dysplasia had 3.5 times (95% IC: 1.5–8.3) increased risk of treatment failure. Being treated through ablative therapy was associated with a 7.4, four-fold (95% IC: 3.2–17.3) increased risk of treatment failure compared to conization Conclusion HIV-positive women have a higher risk of treatment failure of HSIL than do HIV-negative women, especially when ablative therapy is used and in women with poor control of their HIV infection. The management and the follow- up of HSIL’s guidelines in this high-risk population should be adapted consequently: for HIV-positive women with uncontrolled viral load, excisional treatment should be the preferred therapy, whereas for women with undetectable viral load, CD4 + lymphocytes higher than 500 cells/mm3 and with a desire of pregnancy, ablative therapy may be considered.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">HIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">HSIL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treatment failure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Immunologic diseases. Allergy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maude Velghe-lenelle</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yannick Manigart</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Déborah Konopnicki</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Serge Rozenberg</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">AIDS Research and Therapy</subfield><subfield code="d">BMC, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2021), 1, Seite 11</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)477528538</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2173450-1</subfield><subfield code="x">17426405</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/e34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1742-6405</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Christine Gilles
spellingShingle	Christine Gilles misc RC581-607 misc HIV misc HSIL misc Treatment failure misc CIN misc Immunologic diseases. Allergy Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women?
authorStr	Christine Gilles
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)477528538
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RC581-607
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	17426405
topic_title	RC581-607 Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women? HIV HSIL Treatment failure CIN
topic	misc RC581-607 misc HIV misc HSIL misc Treatment failure misc CIN misc Immunologic diseases. Allergy
topic_unstemmed	misc RC581-607 misc HIV misc HSIL misc Treatment failure misc CIN misc Immunologic diseases. Allergy
topic_browse	misc RC581-607 misc HIV misc HSIL misc Treatment failure misc CIN misc Immunologic diseases. Allergy
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	AIDS Research and Therapy
hierarchy_parent_id	477528538
hierarchy_top_title	AIDS Research and Therapy
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)477528538 (DE-600)2173450-1
title	Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women?
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ058528709 (DE-599)DOAJe34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a
title_full	Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women?
author_sort	Christine Gilles
journal	AIDS Research and Therapy
journalStr	AIDS Research and Therapy
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	11
author_browse	Christine Gilles Maude Velghe-lenelle Yannick Manigart Déborah Konopnicki Serge Rozenberg
container_volume	18
class	RC581-607
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Christine Gilles
doi_str_mv	10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (hsil) be different in hiv-positive women?
callnumber	RC581-607
title_auth	Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women?
abstract	Abstract Background This study compares the management and outcome of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in HIV-positive and -negative women and identifies risk factors for treatment failure. Methods This retrospective, controlled study includes 146 HIV-positive women, matched for HSIL, age and year of diagnosis, with 146 HIV-negative women. Differences were analysed using parametric and non-parametric tests and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for treatment failure. Results Persistence of cervical disease was observed most frequently in HIV-positive women (42 versus 17%) (p < 0.001) and the cone biopsy margins were more often invaded in HIV-positive-women than in HIV-negative ones. (37 versus 16%; p < 0.05). HIV-positive women, with successful cervical treatment had better HIV disease control: with significantly longer periods of undetectable HIV viral loads (VL) (19 versus 5 months; p < 0.001) and higher CD4 counts (491 versus 320 cells/mm3; p < 0.001). HIV-positive women with detectable VL at the time of dysplasia had 3.5 times (95% IC: 1.5–8.3) increased risk of treatment failure. Being treated through ablative therapy was associated with a 7.4, four-fold (95% IC: 3.2–17.3) increased risk of treatment failure compared to conization Conclusion HIV-positive women have a higher risk of treatment failure of HSIL than do HIV-negative women, especially when ablative therapy is used and in women with poor control of their HIV infection. The management and the follow- up of HSIL’s guidelines in this high-risk population should be adapted consequently: for HIV-positive women with uncontrolled viral load, excisional treatment should be the preferred therapy, whereas for women with undetectable viral load, CD4 + lymphocytes higher than 500 cells/mm3 and with a desire of pregnancy, ablative therapy may be considered.
abstractGer	Abstract Background This study compares the management and outcome of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in HIV-positive and -negative women and identifies risk factors for treatment failure. Methods This retrospective, controlled study includes 146 HIV-positive women, matched for HSIL, age and year of diagnosis, with 146 HIV-negative women. Differences were analysed using parametric and non-parametric tests and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for treatment failure. Results Persistence of cervical disease was observed most frequently in HIV-positive women (42 versus 17%) (p < 0.001) and the cone biopsy margins were more often invaded in HIV-positive-women than in HIV-negative ones. (37 versus 16%; p < 0.05). HIV-positive women, with successful cervical treatment had better HIV disease control: with significantly longer periods of undetectable HIV viral loads (VL) (19 versus 5 months; p < 0.001) and higher CD4 counts (491 versus 320 cells/mm3; p < 0.001). HIV-positive women with detectable VL at the time of dysplasia had 3.5 times (95% IC: 1.5–8.3) increased risk of treatment failure. Being treated through ablative therapy was associated with a 7.4, four-fold (95% IC: 3.2–17.3) increased risk of treatment failure compared to conization Conclusion HIV-positive women have a higher risk of treatment failure of HSIL than do HIV-negative women, especially when ablative therapy is used and in women with poor control of their HIV infection. The management and the follow- up of HSIL’s guidelines in this high-risk population should be adapted consequently: for HIV-positive women with uncontrolled viral load, excisional treatment should be the preferred therapy, whereas for women with undetectable viral load, CD4 + lymphocytes higher than 500 cells/mm3 and with a desire of pregnancy, ablative therapy may be considered.
abstract_unstemmed	Abstract Background This study compares the management and outcome of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in HIV-positive and -negative women and identifies risk factors for treatment failure. Methods This retrospective, controlled study includes 146 HIV-positive women, matched for HSIL, age and year of diagnosis, with 146 HIV-negative women. Differences were analysed using parametric and non-parametric tests and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for treatment failure. Results Persistence of cervical disease was observed most frequently in HIV-positive women (42 versus 17%) (p < 0.001) and the cone biopsy margins were more often invaded in HIV-positive-women than in HIV-negative ones. (37 versus 16%; p < 0.05). HIV-positive women, with successful cervical treatment had better HIV disease control: with significantly longer periods of undetectable HIV viral loads (VL) (19 versus 5 months; p < 0.001) and higher CD4 counts (491 versus 320 cells/mm3; p < 0.001). HIV-positive women with detectable VL at the time of dysplasia had 3.5 times (95% IC: 1.5–8.3) increased risk of treatment failure. Being treated through ablative therapy was associated with a 7.4, four-fold (95% IC: 3.2–17.3) increased risk of treatment failure compared to conization Conclusion HIV-positive women have a higher risk of treatment failure of HSIL than do HIV-negative women, especially when ablative therapy is used and in women with poor control of their HIV infection. The management and the follow- up of HSIL’s guidelines in this high-risk population should be adapted consequently: for HIV-positive women with uncontrolled viral load, excisional treatment should be the preferred therapy, whereas for women with undetectable viral load, CD4 + lymphocytes higher than 500 cells/mm3 and with a desire of pregnancy, ablative therapy may be considered.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women?
url	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x https://doaj.org/article/e34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a https://doaj.org/toc/1742-6405
remote_bool	true
author2	Maude Velghe-lenelle Yannick Manigart Déborah Konopnicki Serge Rozenberg
author2Str	Maude Velghe-lenelle Yannick Manigart Déborah Konopnicki Serge Rozenberg
ppnlink	477528538
callnumber-subject	RC - Internal Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x
callnumber-a	RC581-607
up_date	2024-07-03T18:32:17.046Z
_version_	1803583788991643648
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ058528709</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308225028.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ058528709</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJe34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC581-607</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Christine Gilles</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Background This study compares the management and outcome of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in HIV-positive and -negative women and identifies risk factors for treatment failure. Methods This retrospective, controlled study includes 146 HIV-positive women, matched for HSIL, age and year of diagnosis, with 146 HIV-negative women. Differences were analysed using parametric and non-parametric tests and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. A binary logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for treatment failure. Results Persistence of cervical disease was observed most frequently in HIV-positive women (42 versus 17%) (p < 0.001) and the cone biopsy margins were more often invaded in HIV-positive-women than in HIV-negative ones. (37 versus 16%; p < 0.05). HIV-positive women, with successful cervical treatment had better HIV disease control: with significantly longer periods of undetectable HIV viral loads (VL) (19 versus 5 months; p < 0.001) and higher CD4 counts (491 versus 320 cells/mm3; p < 0.001). HIV-positive women with detectable VL at the time of dysplasia had 3.5 times (95% IC: 1.5–8.3) increased risk of treatment failure. Being treated through ablative therapy was associated with a 7.4, four-fold (95% IC: 3.2–17.3) increased risk of treatment failure compared to conization Conclusion HIV-positive women have a higher risk of treatment failure of HSIL than do HIV-negative women, especially when ablative therapy is used and in women with poor control of their HIV infection. The management and the follow- up of HSIL’s guidelines in this high-risk population should be adapted consequently: for HIV-positive women with uncontrolled viral load, excisional treatment should be the preferred therapy, whereas for women with undetectable viral load, CD4 + lymphocytes higher than 500 cells/mm3 and with a desire of pregnancy, ablative therapy may be considered.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">HIV</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">HSIL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treatment failure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">CIN</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Immunologic diseases. Allergy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maude Velghe-lenelle</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yannick Manigart</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Déborah Konopnicki</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Serge Rozenberg</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">AIDS Research and Therapy</subfield><subfield code="d">BMC, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">18(2021), 1, Seite 11</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)477528538</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2173450-1</subfield><subfield code="x">17426405</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:18</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/e34fe58fa39a4fc492f61435af24e23a</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12981-021-00371-x</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1742-6405</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">18</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">11</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401434

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Should the management of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be different in HIV-positive women?

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?