Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013
This evaluation was a case study of the bridging language program offered at YSU to KNB students, it evaluated the generations 2012/2013. The focus of this evaluation was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the bridging program. This was a summative evaluation used the CIPP method. It was a...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez [verfasserIn] Djemari Mardapi [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2015 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Research and Evaluation in Education - Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2016, 1(2015), 2, Seite 146-157 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:1 ; year:2015 ; number:2 ; pages:146-157 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ059295120 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ059295120 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240414092955.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ059295120 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJdd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This evaluation was a case study of the bridging language program offered at YSU to KNB students, it evaluated the generations 2012/2013. The focus of this evaluation was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the bridging program. This was a summative evaluation used the CIPP method. It was a pragmatic parallel mix-method design research. The analysis technique was descriptive for the qualitative data; and it was descriptive statistical for the quantitative data; Triangulation was used. 15 students, 6 teachers, 10 tutors, 3 administrators were involved. In each component of the evaluation strengths and weaknesses were found. The main strengths were: Clear cultural objectives, experience teachers, tutorials helped students a lot. The main weaknesses were: There is not clear criteria of the level to be reach, tutors lack training and time to prepare, material and assessment needs to be improve, students don’t reach an upper intermediate level of the language. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a evaluation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bridging course | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cipp | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bipa | |
| 650 | 4 | |a knb students | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Education | |
| 653 | 0 | |a L | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Djemari Mardapi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Research and Evaluation in Education |d Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2016 |g 1(2015), 2, Seite 146-157 |w (DE-627)1760647047 |w (DE-600)3072811-3 |x 24606995 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:146-157 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/dd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/6667 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2460-6995 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 1 |j 2015 |e 2 |h 146-157 | ||
| author_variant |
b e o p beop d m dm |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:24606995:2015----::vlainfhbigncusofrdtuiesttfrintd |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| allfields |
10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059295120 (DE-599)DOAJdd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez verfasserin aut Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This evaluation was a case study of the bridging language program offered at YSU to KNB students, it evaluated the generations 2012/2013. The focus of this evaluation was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the bridging program. This was a summative evaluation used the CIPP method. It was a pragmatic parallel mix-method design research. The analysis technique was descriptive for the qualitative data; and it was descriptive statistical for the quantitative data; Triangulation was used. 15 students, 6 teachers, 10 tutors, 3 administrators were involved. In each component of the evaluation strengths and weaknesses were found. The main strengths were: Clear cultural objectives, experience teachers, tutorials helped students a lot. The main weaknesses were: There is not clear criteria of the level to be reach, tutors lack training and time to prepare, material and assessment needs to be improve, students don’t reach an upper intermediate level of the language. evaluation bridging course cipp bipa knb students Education L Djemari Mardapi verfasserin aut In Research and Evaluation in Education Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2016 1(2015), 2, Seite 146-157 (DE-627)1760647047 (DE-600)3072811-3 24606995 nnns volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:146-157 https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c kostenfrei https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/6667 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2460-6995 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2015 2 146-157 |
| spelling |
10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059295120 (DE-599)DOAJdd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez verfasserin aut Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This evaluation was a case study of the bridging language program offered at YSU to KNB students, it evaluated the generations 2012/2013. The focus of this evaluation was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the bridging program. This was a summative evaluation used the CIPP method. It was a pragmatic parallel mix-method design research. The analysis technique was descriptive for the qualitative data; and it was descriptive statistical for the quantitative data; Triangulation was used. 15 students, 6 teachers, 10 tutors, 3 administrators were involved. In each component of the evaluation strengths and weaknesses were found. The main strengths were: Clear cultural objectives, experience teachers, tutorials helped students a lot. The main weaknesses were: There is not clear criteria of the level to be reach, tutors lack training and time to prepare, material and assessment needs to be improve, students don’t reach an upper intermediate level of the language. evaluation bridging course cipp bipa knb students Education L Djemari Mardapi verfasserin aut In Research and Evaluation in Education Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2016 1(2015), 2, Seite 146-157 (DE-627)1760647047 (DE-600)3072811-3 24606995 nnns volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:146-157 https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c kostenfrei https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/6667 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2460-6995 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2015 2 146-157 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059295120 (DE-599)DOAJdd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez verfasserin aut Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This evaluation was a case study of the bridging language program offered at YSU to KNB students, it evaluated the generations 2012/2013. The focus of this evaluation was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the bridging program. This was a summative evaluation used the CIPP method. It was a pragmatic parallel mix-method design research. The analysis technique was descriptive for the qualitative data; and it was descriptive statistical for the quantitative data; Triangulation was used. 15 students, 6 teachers, 10 tutors, 3 administrators were involved. In each component of the evaluation strengths and weaknesses were found. The main strengths were: Clear cultural objectives, experience teachers, tutorials helped students a lot. The main weaknesses were: There is not clear criteria of the level to be reach, tutors lack training and time to prepare, material and assessment needs to be improve, students don’t reach an upper intermediate level of the language. evaluation bridging course cipp bipa knb students Education L Djemari Mardapi verfasserin aut In Research and Evaluation in Education Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2016 1(2015), 2, Seite 146-157 (DE-627)1760647047 (DE-600)3072811-3 24606995 nnns volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:146-157 https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c kostenfrei https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/6667 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2460-6995 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2015 2 146-157 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059295120 (DE-599)DOAJdd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez verfasserin aut Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This evaluation was a case study of the bridging language program offered at YSU to KNB students, it evaluated the generations 2012/2013. The focus of this evaluation was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the bridging program. This was a summative evaluation used the CIPP method. It was a pragmatic parallel mix-method design research. The analysis technique was descriptive for the qualitative data; and it was descriptive statistical for the quantitative data; Triangulation was used. 15 students, 6 teachers, 10 tutors, 3 administrators were involved. In each component of the evaluation strengths and weaknesses were found. The main strengths were: Clear cultural objectives, experience teachers, tutorials helped students a lot. The main weaknesses were: There is not clear criteria of the level to be reach, tutors lack training and time to prepare, material and assessment needs to be improve, students don’t reach an upper intermediate level of the language. evaluation bridging course cipp bipa knb students Education L Djemari Mardapi verfasserin aut In Research and Evaluation in Education Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2016 1(2015), 2, Seite 146-157 (DE-627)1760647047 (DE-600)3072811-3 24606995 nnns volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:146-157 https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c kostenfrei https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/6667 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2460-6995 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2015 2 146-157 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059295120 (DE-599)DOAJdd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez verfasserin aut Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This evaluation was a case study of the bridging language program offered at YSU to KNB students, it evaluated the generations 2012/2013. The focus of this evaluation was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the bridging program. This was a summative evaluation used the CIPP method. It was a pragmatic parallel mix-method design research. The analysis technique was descriptive for the qualitative data; and it was descriptive statistical for the quantitative data; Triangulation was used. 15 students, 6 teachers, 10 tutors, 3 administrators were involved. In each component of the evaluation strengths and weaknesses were found. The main strengths were: Clear cultural objectives, experience teachers, tutorials helped students a lot. The main weaknesses were: There is not clear criteria of the level to be reach, tutors lack training and time to prepare, material and assessment needs to be improve, students don’t reach an upper intermediate level of the language. evaluation bridging course cipp bipa knb students Education L Djemari Mardapi verfasserin aut In Research and Evaluation in Education Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2016 1(2015), 2, Seite 146-157 (DE-627)1760647047 (DE-600)3072811-3 24606995 nnns volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:146-157 https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/dd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c kostenfrei https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/6667 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2460-6995 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 1 2015 2 146-157 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Research and Evaluation in Education 1(2015), 2, Seite 146-157 volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:146-157 |
| sourceStr |
In Research and Evaluation in Education 1(2015), 2, Seite 146-157 volume:1 year:2015 number:2 pages:146-157 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
evaluation bridging course cipp bipa knb students Education L |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Research and Evaluation in Education |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez @@aut@@ Djemari Mardapi @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760647047 |
| id |
DOAJ059295120 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ059295120</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414092955.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ059295120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This evaluation was a case study of the bridging language program offered at YSU to KNB students, it evaluated the generations 2012/2013. The focus of this evaluation was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the bridging program. This was a summative evaluation used the CIPP method. It was a pragmatic parallel mix-method design research. The analysis technique was descriptive for the qualitative data; and it was descriptive statistical for the quantitative data; Triangulation was used. 15 students, 6 teachers, 10 tutors, 3 administrators were involved. In each component of the evaluation strengths and weaknesses were found. The main strengths were: Clear cultural objectives, experience teachers, tutorials helped students a lot. The main weaknesses were: There is not clear criteria of the level to be reach, tutors lack training and time to prepare, material and assessment needs to be improve, students don’t reach an upper intermediate level of the language.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bridging course</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cipp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bipa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">knb students</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Djemari Mardapi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Research and Evaluation in Education</subfield><subfield code="d">Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2015), 2, Seite 146-157</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760647047</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3072811-3</subfield><subfield code="x">24606995</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:146-157</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/dd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/6667</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2460-6995</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">146-157</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez |
| spellingShingle |
Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez misc evaluation misc bridging course misc cipp misc bipa misc knb students misc Education misc L Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013 |
| authorStr |
Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760647047 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
24606995 |
| topic_title |
Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013 evaluation bridging course cipp bipa knb students |
| topic |
misc evaluation misc bridging course misc cipp misc bipa misc knb students misc Education misc L |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc evaluation misc bridging course misc cipp misc bipa misc knb students misc Education misc L |
| topic_browse |
misc evaluation misc bridging course misc cipp misc bipa misc knb students misc Education misc L |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Research and Evaluation in Education |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760647047 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Research and Evaluation in Education |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760647047 (DE-600)3072811-3 |
| title |
Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013 |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ059295120 (DE-599)DOAJdd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c |
| title_full |
Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013 |
| author_sort |
Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez |
| journal |
Research and Evaluation in Education |
| journalStr |
Research and Evaluation in Education |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2015 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
146 |
| author_browse |
Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez Djemari Mardapi |
| container_volume |
1 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez |
| doi_str_mv |
10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: batches of 2012 and 2013 |
| title_auth |
Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013 |
| abstract |
This evaluation was a case study of the bridging language program offered at YSU to KNB students, it evaluated the generations 2012/2013. The focus of this evaluation was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the bridging program. This was a summative evaluation used the CIPP method. It was a pragmatic parallel mix-method design research. The analysis technique was descriptive for the qualitative data; and it was descriptive statistical for the quantitative data; Triangulation was used. 15 students, 6 teachers, 10 tutors, 3 administrators were involved. In each component of the evaluation strengths and weaknesses were found. The main strengths were: Clear cultural objectives, experience teachers, tutorials helped students a lot. The main weaknesses were: There is not clear criteria of the level to be reach, tutors lack training and time to prepare, material and assessment needs to be improve, students don’t reach an upper intermediate level of the language. |
| abstractGer |
This evaluation was a case study of the bridging language program offered at YSU to KNB students, it evaluated the generations 2012/2013. The focus of this evaluation was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the bridging program. This was a summative evaluation used the CIPP method. It was a pragmatic parallel mix-method design research. The analysis technique was descriptive for the qualitative data; and it was descriptive statistical for the quantitative data; Triangulation was used. 15 students, 6 teachers, 10 tutors, 3 administrators were involved. In each component of the evaluation strengths and weaknesses were found. The main strengths were: Clear cultural objectives, experience teachers, tutorials helped students a lot. The main weaknesses were: There is not clear criteria of the level to be reach, tutors lack training and time to prepare, material and assessment needs to be improve, students don’t reach an upper intermediate level of the language. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This evaluation was a case study of the bridging language program offered at YSU to KNB students, it evaluated the generations 2012/2013. The focus of this evaluation was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the bridging program. This was a summative evaluation used the CIPP method. It was a pragmatic parallel mix-method design research. The analysis technique was descriptive for the qualitative data; and it was descriptive statistical for the quantitative data; Triangulation was used. 15 students, 6 teachers, 10 tutors, 3 administrators were involved. In each component of the evaluation strengths and weaknesses were found. The main strengths were: Clear cultural objectives, experience teachers, tutorials helped students a lot. The main weaknesses were: There is not clear criteria of the level to be reach, tutors lack training and time to prepare, material and assessment needs to be improve, students don’t reach an upper intermediate level of the language. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
2 |
| title_short |
Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 https://doaj.org/article/dd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/6667 https://doaj.org/toc/2460-6995 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Djemari Mardapi |
| author2Str |
Djemari Mardapi |
| ppnlink |
1760647047 |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T22:46:42.762Z |
| _version_ |
1803599796254015488 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ059295120</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240414092955.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ059295120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beatriz Eugenia Orantes Perez</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Evaluation of the bridging course offered at a university to foreign students: Batches of 2012 and 2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This evaluation was a case study of the bridging language program offered at YSU to KNB students, it evaluated the generations 2012/2013. The focus of this evaluation was to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the bridging program. This was a summative evaluation used the CIPP method. It was a pragmatic parallel mix-method design research. The analysis technique was descriptive for the qualitative data; and it was descriptive statistical for the quantitative data; Triangulation was used. 15 students, 6 teachers, 10 tutors, 3 administrators were involved. In each component of the evaluation strengths and weaknesses were found. The main strengths were: Clear cultural objectives, experience teachers, tutorials helped students a lot. The main weaknesses were: There is not clear criteria of the level to be reach, tutors lack training and time to prepare, material and assessment needs to be improve, students don’t reach an upper intermediate level of the language.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bridging course</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cipp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bipa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">knb students</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">L</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Djemari Mardapi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Research and Evaluation in Education</subfield><subfield code="d">Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">1(2015), 2, Seite 146-157</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760647047</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3072811-3</subfield><subfield code="x">24606995</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:146-157</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i2.6667</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/dd163e976f8e45ea9667c188fff8ca4c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid/article/view/6667</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2460-6995</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">146-157</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399914 |