Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization

Objectives: (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommen...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Melissa R. McHale [verfasserIn] Scott M. Beck [verfasserIn] Steward T. A. Pickett [verfasserIn] Daniel L. Childers [verfasserIn] Mary L. Cadenasso [verfasserIn] Louie Rivers [verfasserIn] Louise Swemmer [verfasserIn] Liesel Ebersohn [verfasserIn] Wayne Twine [verfasserIn] David N Bunn [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2018

Schlagwörter:	Ecosystem services social-ecological systems heterogeneity landcover pluralistic deliberative

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Ecosystem Health and Sustainability - American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2016, 4(2018), 5, Seite 115-131
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:4 ; year:2018 ; number:5 ; pages:115-131

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ059709693

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ059709693
003	DE-627
005	20230308235016.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ059709693
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJe9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a QH540-549.5
100	0		\|a Melissa R. McHale \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization
264		1	\|c 2018
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Objectives: (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses. Methods: Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function. Results: We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments. Conclusion: A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future social-ecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity. It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making.
650		4	\|a Ecosystem services
650		4	\|a social-ecological systems
650		4	\|a heterogeneity
650		4	\|a landcover
650		4	\|a pluralistic
650		4	\|a deliberative
653		0	\|a Ecology
700	0		\|a Scott M. Beck \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Steward T. A. Pickett \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Daniel L. Childers \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Mary L. Cadenasso \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Louie Rivers \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Louise Swemmer \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Liesel Ebersohn \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Wayne Twine \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a David N Bunn \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Ecosystem Health and Sustainability \|d American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2016 \|g 4(2018), 5, Seite 115-131 \|w (DE-627)821017500 \|w (DE-600)2815489-7 \|x 23328878 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:4 \|g year:2018 \|g number:5 \|g pages:115-131
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/e9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2147
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2148
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 4 \|j 2018 \|e 5 \|h 115-131

Indexfelder

author_variant	m r m mrm s m b smb s t a p stap d l c dlc m l c mlc l r lr l s ls l e le w t wt d n b dnb
matchkey_str	article:23328878:2018----::eortztooeoytmevcsrdclprahoassigauebnf
hierarchy_sort_str	2018
callnumber-subject-code	QH
publishDate	2018
allfields	10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059709693 (DE-599)DOAJe9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Melissa R. McHale verfasserin aut Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses. Methods: Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function. Results: We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments. Conclusion: A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future social-ecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity. It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making. Ecosystem services social-ecological systems heterogeneity landcover pluralistic deliberative Ecology Scott M. Beck verfasserin aut Steward T. A. Pickett verfasserin aut Daniel L. Childers verfasserin aut Mary L. Cadenasso verfasserin aut Louie Rivers verfasserin aut Louise Swemmer verfasserin aut Liesel Ebersohn verfasserin aut Wayne Twine verfasserin aut David N Bunn verfasserin aut In Ecosystem Health and Sustainability American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2016 4(2018), 5, Seite 115-131 (DE-627)821017500 (DE-600)2815489-7 23328878 nnns volume:4 year:2018 number:5 pages:115-131 https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2018 5 115-131
spelling	10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059709693 (DE-599)DOAJe9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Melissa R. McHale verfasserin aut Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses. Methods: Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function. Results: We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments. Conclusion: A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future social-ecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity. It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making. Ecosystem services social-ecological systems heterogeneity landcover pluralistic deliberative Ecology Scott M. Beck verfasserin aut Steward T. A. Pickett verfasserin aut Daniel L. Childers verfasserin aut Mary L. Cadenasso verfasserin aut Louie Rivers verfasserin aut Louise Swemmer verfasserin aut Liesel Ebersohn verfasserin aut Wayne Twine verfasserin aut David N Bunn verfasserin aut In Ecosystem Health and Sustainability American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2016 4(2018), 5, Seite 115-131 (DE-627)821017500 (DE-600)2815489-7 23328878 nnns volume:4 year:2018 number:5 pages:115-131 https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2018 5 115-131
allfields_unstemmed	10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059709693 (DE-599)DOAJe9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Melissa R. McHale verfasserin aut Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses. Methods: Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function. Results: We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments. Conclusion: A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future social-ecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity. It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making. Ecosystem services social-ecological systems heterogeneity landcover pluralistic deliberative Ecology Scott M. Beck verfasserin aut Steward T. A. Pickett verfasserin aut Daniel L. Childers verfasserin aut Mary L. Cadenasso verfasserin aut Louie Rivers verfasserin aut Louise Swemmer verfasserin aut Liesel Ebersohn verfasserin aut Wayne Twine verfasserin aut David N Bunn verfasserin aut In Ecosystem Health and Sustainability American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2016 4(2018), 5, Seite 115-131 (DE-627)821017500 (DE-600)2815489-7 23328878 nnns volume:4 year:2018 number:5 pages:115-131 https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2018 5 115-131
allfieldsGer	10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059709693 (DE-599)DOAJe9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Melissa R. McHale verfasserin aut Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses. Methods: Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function. Results: We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments. Conclusion: A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future social-ecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity. It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making. Ecosystem services social-ecological systems heterogeneity landcover pluralistic deliberative Ecology Scott M. Beck verfasserin aut Steward T. A. Pickett verfasserin aut Daniel L. Childers verfasserin aut Mary L. Cadenasso verfasserin aut Louie Rivers verfasserin aut Louise Swemmer verfasserin aut Liesel Ebersohn verfasserin aut Wayne Twine verfasserin aut David N Bunn verfasserin aut In Ecosystem Health and Sustainability American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2016 4(2018), 5, Seite 115-131 (DE-627)821017500 (DE-600)2815489-7 23328878 nnns volume:4 year:2018 number:5 pages:115-131 https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2018 5 115-131
allfieldsSound	10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059709693 (DE-599)DOAJe9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Melissa R. McHale verfasserin aut Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objectives: (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses. Methods: Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function. Results: We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments. Conclusion: A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future social-ecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity. It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making. Ecosystem services social-ecological systems heterogeneity landcover pluralistic deliberative Ecology Scott M. Beck verfasserin aut Steward T. A. Pickett verfasserin aut Daniel L. Childers verfasserin aut Mary L. Cadenasso verfasserin aut Louie Rivers verfasserin aut Louise Swemmer verfasserin aut Liesel Ebersohn verfasserin aut Wayne Twine verfasserin aut David N Bunn verfasserin aut In Ecosystem Health and Sustainability American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2016 4(2018), 5, Seite 115-131 (DE-627)821017500 (DE-600)2815489-7 23328878 nnns volume:4 year:2018 number:5 pages:115-131 https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/e9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e kostenfrei http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 4 2018 5 115-131
language	English
source	In Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 4(2018), 5, Seite 115-131 volume:4 year:2018 number:5 pages:115-131
sourceStr	In Ecosystem Health and Sustainability 4(2018), 5, Seite 115-131 volume:4 year:2018 number:5 pages:115-131
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Ecosystem services social-ecological systems heterogeneity landcover pluralistic deliberative Ecology
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Melissa R. McHale @@aut@@ Scott M. Beck @@aut@@ Steward T. A. Pickett @@aut@@ Daniel L. Childers @@aut@@ Mary L. Cadenasso @@aut@@ Louie Rivers @@aut@@ Louise Swemmer @@aut@@ Liesel Ebersohn @@aut@@ Wayne Twine @@aut@@ David N Bunn @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2018-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	821017500
id	DOAJ059709693
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ059709693</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308235016.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ059709693</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJe9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH540-549.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Melissa R. McHale</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives: (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses. Methods: Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function. Results: We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments. Conclusion: A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future social-ecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity. It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ecosystem services</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social-ecological systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">heterogeneity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">landcover</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pluralistic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">deliberative</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scott M. Beck</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Steward T. A. Pickett</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniel L. Childers</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mary L. Cadenasso</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Louie Rivers</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Louise Swemmer</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liesel Ebersohn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wayne Twine</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David N Bunn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecosystem Health and Sustainability</subfield><subfield code="d">American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2018), 5, Seite 115-131</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)821017500</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2815489-7</subfield><subfield code="x">23328878</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:115-131</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/e9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">115-131</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	Q - Science
author	Melissa R. McHale
spellingShingle	Melissa R. McHale misc QH540-549.5 misc Ecosystem services misc social-ecological systems misc heterogeneity misc landcover misc pluralistic misc deliberative misc Ecology Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization
authorStr	Melissa R. McHale
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)821017500
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	QH540-549
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	23328878
topic_title	QH540-549.5 Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization Ecosystem services social-ecological systems heterogeneity landcover pluralistic deliberative
topic	misc QH540-549.5 misc Ecosystem services misc social-ecological systems misc heterogeneity misc landcover misc pluralistic misc deliberative misc Ecology
topic_unstemmed	misc QH540-549.5 misc Ecosystem services misc social-ecological systems misc heterogeneity misc landcover misc pluralistic misc deliberative misc Ecology
topic_browse	misc QH540-549.5 misc Ecosystem services misc social-ecological systems misc heterogeneity misc landcover misc pluralistic misc deliberative misc Ecology
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
hierarchy_parent_id	821017500
hierarchy_top_title	Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)821017500 (DE-600)2815489-7
title	Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ059709693 (DE-599)DOAJe9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e
title_full	Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization
author_sort	Melissa R. McHale
journal	Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
journalStr	Ecosystem Health and Sustainability
callnumber-first-code	Q
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2018
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	115
author_browse	Melissa R. McHale Scott M. Beck Steward T. A. Pickett Daniel L. Childers Mary L. Cadenasso Louie Rivers Louise Swemmer Liesel Ebersohn Wayne Twine David N Bunn
container_volume	4
class	QH540-549.5
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Melissa R. McHale
doi_str_mv	10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization
callnumber	QH540-549.5
title_auth	Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization
abstract	Objectives: (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses. Methods: Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function. Results: We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments. Conclusion: A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future social-ecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity. It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making.
abstractGer	Objectives: (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses. Methods: Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function. Results: We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments. Conclusion: A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future social-ecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity. It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making.
abstract_unstemmed	Objectives: (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses. Methods: Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function. Results: We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments. Conclusion: A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future social-ecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity. It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2147 GBV_ILN_2148 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	5
title_short	Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization
url	https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 https://doaj.org/article/e9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905 https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129 https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878
remote_bool	true
author2	Scott M. Beck Steward T. A. Pickett Daniel L. Childers Mary L. Cadenasso Louie Rivers Louise Swemmer Liesel Ebersohn Wayne Twine David N Bunn
author2Str	Scott M. Beck Steward T. A. Pickett Daniel L. Childers Mary L. Cadenasso Louie Rivers Louise Swemmer Liesel Ebersohn Wayne Twine David N Bunn
ppnlink	821017500
callnumber-subject	QH - Natural History and Biology
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905
callnumber-a	QH540-549.5
up_date	2024-07-04T00:35:55.175Z
_version_	1803606666957029376
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ059709693</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230308235016.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2018 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ059709693</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJe9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH540-549.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Melissa R. McHale</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objectives: (1) To evaluate how ecosystem services may be utilized to either reinforce or fracture the planning and development practices that emerged from segregation and economic exclusion; (2) To survey the current state of ecosystem service assessments and synthesize a growing number of recommendations from the literature for renovating ecosystem service analyses. Methods: Utilizing current maps of ecosystem service distribution in Bushbuckridge Local Municipality, South Africa, we considered how a democratized process of assessing ecosystem services will produce a more nuanced representation of diverse values in society and capture heterogeneity in ecosystem structure and function. Results: We propose interventions for assessing ecosystem services that are inclusive of a broad range of stakeholders’ values and result in actual quantification of social and ecological processes. We demonstrate how to operationalize a pluralistic framework for ecosystem service assessments. Conclusion: A democratized approach to ecosystem service assessments is a reimagined path to rescuing a poorly implemented concept and designing and managing future social-ecological systems that benefit people and support ecosystem integrity. It is the responsibility of scientists who do ecosystem services research to embrace more complex, pluralistic frameworks so that sound and inclusive scientific information is utilized in decision-making.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ecosystem services</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social-ecological systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">heterogeneity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">landcover</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pluralistic</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">deliberative</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Scott M. Beck</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Steward T. A. Pickett</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Daniel L. Childers</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mary L. Cadenasso</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Louie Rivers</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Louise Swemmer</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liesel Ebersohn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wayne Twine</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">David N Bunn</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecosystem Health and Sustainability</subfield><subfield code="d">American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">4(2018), 5, Seite 115-131</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)821017500</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2815489-7</subfield><subfield code="x">23328878</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:4</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:115-131</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/e9ed8c124fea402d90a0eee9d7b38d3e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2096-4129</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8878</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2147</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2148</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">4</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">115-131</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3988304

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Democratization of ecosystem services—a radical approach for assessing nature’s benefits in the face of urbanization

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?