Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model
Background Data: In the late fifties of the last century, Boucher described posterior pedicle screw placement for the first time for treatment of a diversity of spinal pathologies. Currently, there are three methods for pedicle screw placement: the free hand, the fluoroscopy guided open and the perc...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Ahmad Elayouty [verfasserIn] Sherif Morad [verfasserIn] Ahmed Salem [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Egyptian Spine Journal - Egyptian Spine Association, 2018, 23(2017), 1, Seite 36-42 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:23 ; year:2017 ; number:1 ; pages:36-42 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ059772867 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ059772867 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230502142930.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ059772867 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJa5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a RC346-429 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Ahmad Elayouty |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Background Data: In the late fifties of the last century, Boucher described posterior pedicle screw placement for the first time for treatment of a diversity of spinal pathologies. Currently, there are three methods for pedicle screw placement: the free hand, the fluoroscopy guided open and the percutaneous techniques. Despite being reported safe and accurate, percutaneous pedicle screw insertion is still being investigated in comparison to the traditional open technique. Purpose: In this study, the authors are trying to find out if there was any superiority of one technique regarding accuracy of screw placement. Study Design: This is a retrospective comparative study designed to assess the accuracy of screw placement in the sagittal plane in patients who underwent lumbar transpedicular fixation by open versus percutaneous techniques. Patients and Methods: Patients were categorized into two groups: group A including patients who underwent open surgery and group B patients who underwent percutaneous fixation. Each screw was categorized according to the sagittal plane into one of the following classes: Class 0: with no cortical penetration at all, Class 1: with a single cortical penetration denoting accepted entry point and trajectory, Class 2: with 2 cortices penetration violating the lateral cortex of the pedicle and/or the vertebral body and Class 3: with 3 cortices penetration and a medially maldirected trajectory violating the roof and floor of the lateral recess. Results: The current study included 51 patients distributed as 28 patients (55 %) in group A and 23 patients (45 %) in group B. A total of 262 screws were investigated with 134 (51.15 %) screws in group A and 128 (48.85 %) screws in group B. Cross tabulation of raw data of different screw type distribution among the two patients’ groups preliminarily revealed a quite favorable screws position among group A patients with 94.77% of screws in class 1, 4.48% in class 2 and 0.75% of screws in class 3 compared to 81.25%, 12.5% and 6.25% respectively in group B of patients. However, statistical analysis using Chi Square test for individual screws’ groups related to specific pedicles failed to show any significant difference with each one of the pertinent P-values<0.05. On the other hand, comparison of maldirected screws (classes 2 and 3 collectively) between the two groups confirmed a statistically high significant difference in the number of maldirected screws per patient with a mean of 0.25 screw/patient in group A compared to 1.043 screw/patient in group B (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion technique is an accepted technique regarding screw accuracy when properly indicated having the advantages of being less traumatic and more cosmetic with its inherent complications and drawbacks including financial issues, more radiation exposure and longer operative time. (2017ESJ144) | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Percutaneous pedicle screw | |
| 650 | 4 | |a open pedicle screw fixation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a pedicle screw accuracy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a lumbar spine | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Sherif Morad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ahmed Salem |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Egyptian Spine Journal |d Egyptian Spine Association, 2018 |g 23(2017), 1, Seite 36-42 |w (DE-627)1760615579 |w (DE-600)3070355-4 |x 23148969 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:23 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:36-42 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/a5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_6757.html |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 23 |j 2017 |e 1 |h 36-42 | ||
| author_variant |
a e ae s m sm a s as |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:23148969:2017----::cuayfcepaeetnubrrnpdclriaincmaaietdbtenpnnpruaeutcn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
RC |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059772867 (DE-599)DOAJa5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC346-429 Ahmad Elayouty verfasserin aut Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Data: In the late fifties of the last century, Boucher described posterior pedicle screw placement for the first time for treatment of a diversity of spinal pathologies. Currently, there are three methods for pedicle screw placement: the free hand, the fluoroscopy guided open and the percutaneous techniques. Despite being reported safe and accurate, percutaneous pedicle screw insertion is still being investigated in comparison to the traditional open technique. Purpose: In this study, the authors are trying to find out if there was any superiority of one technique regarding accuracy of screw placement. Study Design: This is a retrospective comparative study designed to assess the accuracy of screw placement in the sagittal plane in patients who underwent lumbar transpedicular fixation by open versus percutaneous techniques. Patients and Methods: Patients were categorized into two groups: group A including patients who underwent open surgery and group B patients who underwent percutaneous fixation. Each screw was categorized according to the sagittal plane into one of the following classes: Class 0: with no cortical penetration at all, Class 1: with a single cortical penetration denoting accepted entry point and trajectory, Class 2: with 2 cortices penetration violating the lateral cortex of the pedicle and/or the vertebral body and Class 3: with 3 cortices penetration and a medially maldirected trajectory violating the roof and floor of the lateral recess. Results: The current study included 51 patients distributed as 28 patients (55 %) in group A and 23 patients (45 %) in group B. A total of 262 screws were investigated with 134 (51.15 %) screws in group A and 128 (48.85 %) screws in group B. Cross tabulation of raw data of different screw type distribution among the two patients’ groups preliminarily revealed a quite favorable screws position among group A patients with 94.77% of screws in class 1, 4.48% in class 2 and 0.75% of screws in class 3 compared to 81.25%, 12.5% and 6.25% respectively in group B of patients. However, statistical analysis using Chi Square test for individual screws’ groups related to specific pedicles failed to show any significant difference with each one of the pertinent P-values<0.05. On the other hand, comparison of maldirected screws (classes 2 and 3 collectively) between the two groups confirmed a statistically high significant difference in the number of maldirected screws per patient with a mean of 0.25 screw/patient in group A compared to 1.043 screw/patient in group B (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion technique is an accepted technique regarding screw accuracy when properly indicated having the advantages of being less traumatic and more cosmetic with its inherent complications and drawbacks including financial issues, more radiation exposure and longer operative time. (2017ESJ144) Percutaneous pedicle screw open pedicle screw fixation pedicle screw accuracy lumbar spine Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Sherif Morad verfasserin aut Ahmed Salem verfasserin aut In Egyptian Spine Journal Egyptian Spine Association, 2018 23(2017), 1, Seite 36-42 (DE-627)1760615579 (DE-600)3070355-4 23148969 nnns volume:23 year:2017 number:1 pages:36-42 https://doi.org/DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 kostenfrei http://www.esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_6757.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 23 2017 1 36-42 |
| spelling |
DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059772867 (DE-599)DOAJa5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC346-429 Ahmad Elayouty verfasserin aut Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Data: In the late fifties of the last century, Boucher described posterior pedicle screw placement for the first time for treatment of a diversity of spinal pathologies. Currently, there are three methods for pedicle screw placement: the free hand, the fluoroscopy guided open and the percutaneous techniques. Despite being reported safe and accurate, percutaneous pedicle screw insertion is still being investigated in comparison to the traditional open technique. Purpose: In this study, the authors are trying to find out if there was any superiority of one technique regarding accuracy of screw placement. Study Design: This is a retrospective comparative study designed to assess the accuracy of screw placement in the sagittal plane in patients who underwent lumbar transpedicular fixation by open versus percutaneous techniques. Patients and Methods: Patients were categorized into two groups: group A including patients who underwent open surgery and group B patients who underwent percutaneous fixation. Each screw was categorized according to the sagittal plane into one of the following classes: Class 0: with no cortical penetration at all, Class 1: with a single cortical penetration denoting accepted entry point and trajectory, Class 2: with 2 cortices penetration violating the lateral cortex of the pedicle and/or the vertebral body and Class 3: with 3 cortices penetration and a medially maldirected trajectory violating the roof and floor of the lateral recess. Results: The current study included 51 patients distributed as 28 patients (55 %) in group A and 23 patients (45 %) in group B. A total of 262 screws were investigated with 134 (51.15 %) screws in group A and 128 (48.85 %) screws in group B. Cross tabulation of raw data of different screw type distribution among the two patients’ groups preliminarily revealed a quite favorable screws position among group A patients with 94.77% of screws in class 1, 4.48% in class 2 and 0.75% of screws in class 3 compared to 81.25%, 12.5% and 6.25% respectively in group B of patients. However, statistical analysis using Chi Square test for individual screws’ groups related to specific pedicles failed to show any significant difference with each one of the pertinent P-values<0.05. On the other hand, comparison of maldirected screws (classes 2 and 3 collectively) between the two groups confirmed a statistically high significant difference in the number of maldirected screws per patient with a mean of 0.25 screw/patient in group A compared to 1.043 screw/patient in group B (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion technique is an accepted technique regarding screw accuracy when properly indicated having the advantages of being less traumatic and more cosmetic with its inherent complications and drawbacks including financial issues, more radiation exposure and longer operative time. (2017ESJ144) Percutaneous pedicle screw open pedicle screw fixation pedicle screw accuracy lumbar spine Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Sherif Morad verfasserin aut Ahmed Salem verfasserin aut In Egyptian Spine Journal Egyptian Spine Association, 2018 23(2017), 1, Seite 36-42 (DE-627)1760615579 (DE-600)3070355-4 23148969 nnns volume:23 year:2017 number:1 pages:36-42 https://doi.org/DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 kostenfrei http://www.esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_6757.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 23 2017 1 36-42 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059772867 (DE-599)DOAJa5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC346-429 Ahmad Elayouty verfasserin aut Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Data: In the late fifties of the last century, Boucher described posterior pedicle screw placement for the first time for treatment of a diversity of spinal pathologies. Currently, there are three methods for pedicle screw placement: the free hand, the fluoroscopy guided open and the percutaneous techniques. Despite being reported safe and accurate, percutaneous pedicle screw insertion is still being investigated in comparison to the traditional open technique. Purpose: In this study, the authors are trying to find out if there was any superiority of one technique regarding accuracy of screw placement. Study Design: This is a retrospective comparative study designed to assess the accuracy of screw placement in the sagittal plane in patients who underwent lumbar transpedicular fixation by open versus percutaneous techniques. Patients and Methods: Patients were categorized into two groups: group A including patients who underwent open surgery and group B patients who underwent percutaneous fixation. Each screw was categorized according to the sagittal plane into one of the following classes: Class 0: with no cortical penetration at all, Class 1: with a single cortical penetration denoting accepted entry point and trajectory, Class 2: with 2 cortices penetration violating the lateral cortex of the pedicle and/or the vertebral body and Class 3: with 3 cortices penetration and a medially maldirected trajectory violating the roof and floor of the lateral recess. Results: The current study included 51 patients distributed as 28 patients (55 %) in group A and 23 patients (45 %) in group B. A total of 262 screws were investigated with 134 (51.15 %) screws in group A and 128 (48.85 %) screws in group B. Cross tabulation of raw data of different screw type distribution among the two patients’ groups preliminarily revealed a quite favorable screws position among group A patients with 94.77% of screws in class 1, 4.48% in class 2 and 0.75% of screws in class 3 compared to 81.25%, 12.5% and 6.25% respectively in group B of patients. However, statistical analysis using Chi Square test for individual screws’ groups related to specific pedicles failed to show any significant difference with each one of the pertinent P-values<0.05. On the other hand, comparison of maldirected screws (classes 2 and 3 collectively) between the two groups confirmed a statistically high significant difference in the number of maldirected screws per patient with a mean of 0.25 screw/patient in group A compared to 1.043 screw/patient in group B (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion technique is an accepted technique regarding screw accuracy when properly indicated having the advantages of being less traumatic and more cosmetic with its inherent complications and drawbacks including financial issues, more radiation exposure and longer operative time. (2017ESJ144) Percutaneous pedicle screw open pedicle screw fixation pedicle screw accuracy lumbar spine Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Sherif Morad verfasserin aut Ahmed Salem verfasserin aut In Egyptian Spine Journal Egyptian Spine Association, 2018 23(2017), 1, Seite 36-42 (DE-627)1760615579 (DE-600)3070355-4 23148969 nnns volume:23 year:2017 number:1 pages:36-42 https://doi.org/DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 kostenfrei http://www.esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_6757.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 23 2017 1 36-42 |
| allfieldsGer |
DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059772867 (DE-599)DOAJa5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC346-429 Ahmad Elayouty verfasserin aut Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Data: In the late fifties of the last century, Boucher described posterior pedicle screw placement for the first time for treatment of a diversity of spinal pathologies. Currently, there are three methods for pedicle screw placement: the free hand, the fluoroscopy guided open and the percutaneous techniques. Despite being reported safe and accurate, percutaneous pedicle screw insertion is still being investigated in comparison to the traditional open technique. Purpose: In this study, the authors are trying to find out if there was any superiority of one technique regarding accuracy of screw placement. Study Design: This is a retrospective comparative study designed to assess the accuracy of screw placement in the sagittal plane in patients who underwent lumbar transpedicular fixation by open versus percutaneous techniques. Patients and Methods: Patients were categorized into two groups: group A including patients who underwent open surgery and group B patients who underwent percutaneous fixation. Each screw was categorized according to the sagittal plane into one of the following classes: Class 0: with no cortical penetration at all, Class 1: with a single cortical penetration denoting accepted entry point and trajectory, Class 2: with 2 cortices penetration violating the lateral cortex of the pedicle and/or the vertebral body and Class 3: with 3 cortices penetration and a medially maldirected trajectory violating the roof and floor of the lateral recess. Results: The current study included 51 patients distributed as 28 patients (55 %) in group A and 23 patients (45 %) in group B. A total of 262 screws were investigated with 134 (51.15 %) screws in group A and 128 (48.85 %) screws in group B. Cross tabulation of raw data of different screw type distribution among the two patients’ groups preliminarily revealed a quite favorable screws position among group A patients with 94.77% of screws in class 1, 4.48% in class 2 and 0.75% of screws in class 3 compared to 81.25%, 12.5% and 6.25% respectively in group B of patients. However, statistical analysis using Chi Square test for individual screws’ groups related to specific pedicles failed to show any significant difference with each one of the pertinent P-values<0.05. On the other hand, comparison of maldirected screws (classes 2 and 3 collectively) between the two groups confirmed a statistically high significant difference in the number of maldirected screws per patient with a mean of 0.25 screw/patient in group A compared to 1.043 screw/patient in group B (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion technique is an accepted technique regarding screw accuracy when properly indicated having the advantages of being less traumatic and more cosmetic with its inherent complications and drawbacks including financial issues, more radiation exposure and longer operative time. (2017ESJ144) Percutaneous pedicle screw open pedicle screw fixation pedicle screw accuracy lumbar spine Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Sherif Morad verfasserin aut Ahmed Salem verfasserin aut In Egyptian Spine Journal Egyptian Spine Association, 2018 23(2017), 1, Seite 36-42 (DE-627)1760615579 (DE-600)3070355-4 23148969 nnns volume:23 year:2017 number:1 pages:36-42 https://doi.org/DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 kostenfrei http://www.esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_6757.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 23 2017 1 36-42 |
| allfieldsSound |
DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 doi (DE-627)DOAJ059772867 (DE-599)DOAJa5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC346-429 Ahmad Elayouty verfasserin aut Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background Data: In the late fifties of the last century, Boucher described posterior pedicle screw placement for the first time for treatment of a diversity of spinal pathologies. Currently, there are three methods for pedicle screw placement: the free hand, the fluoroscopy guided open and the percutaneous techniques. Despite being reported safe and accurate, percutaneous pedicle screw insertion is still being investigated in comparison to the traditional open technique. Purpose: In this study, the authors are trying to find out if there was any superiority of one technique regarding accuracy of screw placement. Study Design: This is a retrospective comparative study designed to assess the accuracy of screw placement in the sagittal plane in patients who underwent lumbar transpedicular fixation by open versus percutaneous techniques. Patients and Methods: Patients were categorized into two groups: group A including patients who underwent open surgery and group B patients who underwent percutaneous fixation. Each screw was categorized according to the sagittal plane into one of the following classes: Class 0: with no cortical penetration at all, Class 1: with a single cortical penetration denoting accepted entry point and trajectory, Class 2: with 2 cortices penetration violating the lateral cortex of the pedicle and/or the vertebral body and Class 3: with 3 cortices penetration and a medially maldirected trajectory violating the roof and floor of the lateral recess. Results: The current study included 51 patients distributed as 28 patients (55 %) in group A and 23 patients (45 %) in group B. A total of 262 screws were investigated with 134 (51.15 %) screws in group A and 128 (48.85 %) screws in group B. Cross tabulation of raw data of different screw type distribution among the two patients’ groups preliminarily revealed a quite favorable screws position among group A patients with 94.77% of screws in class 1, 4.48% in class 2 and 0.75% of screws in class 3 compared to 81.25%, 12.5% and 6.25% respectively in group B of patients. However, statistical analysis using Chi Square test for individual screws’ groups related to specific pedicles failed to show any significant difference with each one of the pertinent P-values<0.05. On the other hand, comparison of maldirected screws (classes 2 and 3 collectively) between the two groups confirmed a statistically high significant difference in the number of maldirected screws per patient with a mean of 0.25 screw/patient in group A compared to 1.043 screw/patient in group B (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion technique is an accepted technique regarding screw accuracy when properly indicated having the advantages of being less traumatic and more cosmetic with its inherent complications and drawbacks including financial issues, more radiation exposure and longer operative time. (2017ESJ144) Percutaneous pedicle screw open pedicle screw fixation pedicle screw accuracy lumbar spine Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Sherif Morad verfasserin aut Ahmed Salem verfasserin aut In Egyptian Spine Journal Egyptian Spine Association, 2018 23(2017), 1, Seite 36-42 (DE-627)1760615579 (DE-600)3070355-4 23148969 nnns volume:23 year:2017 number:1 pages:36-42 https://doi.org/DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/a5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 kostenfrei http://www.esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_6757.html kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 23 2017 1 36-42 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Egyptian Spine Journal 23(2017), 1, Seite 36-42 volume:23 year:2017 number:1 pages:36-42 |
| sourceStr |
In Egyptian Spine Journal 23(2017), 1, Seite 36-42 volume:23 year:2017 number:1 pages:36-42 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Percutaneous pedicle screw open pedicle screw fixation pedicle screw accuracy lumbar spine Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Egyptian Spine Journal |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Ahmad Elayouty @@aut@@ Sherif Morad @@aut@@ Ahmed Salem @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760615579 |
| id |
DOAJ059772867 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ059772867</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502142930.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ059772867</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC346-429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ahmad Elayouty</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Data: In the late fifties of the last century, Boucher described posterior pedicle screw placement for the first time for treatment of a diversity of spinal pathologies. Currently, there are three methods for pedicle screw placement: the free hand, the fluoroscopy guided open and the percutaneous techniques. Despite being reported safe and accurate, percutaneous pedicle screw insertion is still being investigated in comparison to the traditional open technique. Purpose: In this study, the authors are trying to find out if there was any superiority of one technique regarding accuracy of screw placement. Study Design: This is a retrospective comparative study designed to assess the accuracy of screw placement in the sagittal plane in patients who underwent lumbar transpedicular fixation by open versus percutaneous techniques. Patients and Methods: Patients were categorized into two groups: group A including patients who underwent open surgery and group B patients who underwent percutaneous fixation. Each screw was categorized according to the sagittal plane into one of the following classes: Class 0: with no cortical penetration at all, Class 1: with a single cortical penetration denoting accepted entry point and trajectory, Class 2: with 2 cortices penetration violating the lateral cortex of the pedicle and/or the vertebral body and Class 3: with 3 cortices penetration and a medially maldirected trajectory violating the roof and floor of the lateral recess. Results: The current study included 51 patients distributed as 28 patients (55 %) in group A and 23 patients (45 %) in group B. A total of 262 screws were investigated with 134 (51.15 %) screws in group A and 128 (48.85 %) screws in group B. Cross tabulation of raw data of different screw type distribution among the two patients’ groups preliminarily revealed a quite favorable screws position among group A patients with 94.77% of screws in class 1, 4.48% in class 2 and 0.75% of screws in class 3 compared to 81.25%, 12.5% and 6.25% respectively in group B of patients. However, statistical analysis using Chi Square test for individual screws’ groups related to specific pedicles failed to show any significant difference with each one of the pertinent P-values<0.05. On the other hand, comparison of maldirected screws (classes 2 and 3 collectively) between the two groups confirmed a statistically high significant difference in the number of maldirected screws per patient with a mean of 0.25 screw/patient in group A compared to 1.043 screw/patient in group B (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion technique is an accepted technique regarding screw accuracy when properly indicated having the advantages of being less traumatic and more cosmetic with its inherent complications and drawbacks including financial issues, more radiation exposure and longer operative time. (2017ESJ144)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Percutaneous pedicle screw</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">open pedicle screw fixation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pedicle screw accuracy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">lumbar spine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sherif Morad</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ahmed Salem</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Egyptian Spine Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Egyptian Spine Association, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2017), 1, Seite 36-42</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760615579</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3070355-4</subfield><subfield code="x">23148969</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:36-42</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_6757.html</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">36-42</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
| author |
Ahmad Elayouty |
| spellingShingle |
Ahmad Elayouty misc RC346-429 misc Percutaneous pedicle screw misc open pedicle screw fixation misc pedicle screw accuracy misc lumbar spine misc Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model |
| authorStr |
Ahmad Elayouty |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760615579 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
RC346-429 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
23148969 |
| topic_title |
RC346-429 Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model Percutaneous pedicle screw open pedicle screw fixation pedicle screw accuracy lumbar spine |
| topic |
misc RC346-429 misc Percutaneous pedicle screw misc open pedicle screw fixation misc pedicle screw accuracy misc lumbar spine misc Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc RC346-429 misc Percutaneous pedicle screw misc open pedicle screw fixation misc pedicle screw accuracy misc lumbar spine misc Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system |
| topic_browse |
misc RC346-429 misc Percutaneous pedicle screw misc open pedicle screw fixation misc pedicle screw accuracy misc lumbar spine misc Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Egyptian Spine Journal |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760615579 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Egyptian Spine Journal |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760615579 (DE-600)3070355-4 |
| title |
Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ059772867 (DE-599)DOAJa5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 |
| title_full |
Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model |
| author_sort |
Ahmad Elayouty |
| journal |
Egyptian Spine Journal |
| journalStr |
Egyptian Spine Journal |
| callnumber-first-code |
R |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
36 |
| author_browse |
Ahmad Elayouty Sherif Morad Ahmed Salem |
| container_volume |
23 |
| class |
RC346-429 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Ahmad Elayouty |
| doi_str_mv |
DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
accuracy of screw placement in lumbar transpedicular fixation: a comparative study between open and percutaneous techniques using a novel classification model |
| callnumber |
RC346-429 |
| title_auth |
Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model |
| abstract |
Background Data: In the late fifties of the last century, Boucher described posterior pedicle screw placement for the first time for treatment of a diversity of spinal pathologies. Currently, there are three methods for pedicle screw placement: the free hand, the fluoroscopy guided open and the percutaneous techniques. Despite being reported safe and accurate, percutaneous pedicle screw insertion is still being investigated in comparison to the traditional open technique. Purpose: In this study, the authors are trying to find out if there was any superiority of one technique regarding accuracy of screw placement. Study Design: This is a retrospective comparative study designed to assess the accuracy of screw placement in the sagittal plane in patients who underwent lumbar transpedicular fixation by open versus percutaneous techniques. Patients and Methods: Patients were categorized into two groups: group A including patients who underwent open surgery and group B patients who underwent percutaneous fixation. Each screw was categorized according to the sagittal plane into one of the following classes: Class 0: with no cortical penetration at all, Class 1: with a single cortical penetration denoting accepted entry point and trajectory, Class 2: with 2 cortices penetration violating the lateral cortex of the pedicle and/or the vertebral body and Class 3: with 3 cortices penetration and a medially maldirected trajectory violating the roof and floor of the lateral recess. Results: The current study included 51 patients distributed as 28 patients (55 %) in group A and 23 patients (45 %) in group B. A total of 262 screws were investigated with 134 (51.15 %) screws in group A and 128 (48.85 %) screws in group B. Cross tabulation of raw data of different screw type distribution among the two patients’ groups preliminarily revealed a quite favorable screws position among group A patients with 94.77% of screws in class 1, 4.48% in class 2 and 0.75% of screws in class 3 compared to 81.25%, 12.5% and 6.25% respectively in group B of patients. However, statistical analysis using Chi Square test for individual screws’ groups related to specific pedicles failed to show any significant difference with each one of the pertinent P-values<0.05. On the other hand, comparison of maldirected screws (classes 2 and 3 collectively) between the two groups confirmed a statistically high significant difference in the number of maldirected screws per patient with a mean of 0.25 screw/patient in group A compared to 1.043 screw/patient in group B (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion technique is an accepted technique regarding screw accuracy when properly indicated having the advantages of being less traumatic and more cosmetic with its inherent complications and drawbacks including financial issues, more radiation exposure and longer operative time. (2017ESJ144) |
| abstractGer |
Background Data: In the late fifties of the last century, Boucher described posterior pedicle screw placement for the first time for treatment of a diversity of spinal pathologies. Currently, there are three methods for pedicle screw placement: the free hand, the fluoroscopy guided open and the percutaneous techniques. Despite being reported safe and accurate, percutaneous pedicle screw insertion is still being investigated in comparison to the traditional open technique. Purpose: In this study, the authors are trying to find out if there was any superiority of one technique regarding accuracy of screw placement. Study Design: This is a retrospective comparative study designed to assess the accuracy of screw placement in the sagittal plane in patients who underwent lumbar transpedicular fixation by open versus percutaneous techniques. Patients and Methods: Patients were categorized into two groups: group A including patients who underwent open surgery and group B patients who underwent percutaneous fixation. Each screw was categorized according to the sagittal plane into one of the following classes: Class 0: with no cortical penetration at all, Class 1: with a single cortical penetration denoting accepted entry point and trajectory, Class 2: with 2 cortices penetration violating the lateral cortex of the pedicle and/or the vertebral body and Class 3: with 3 cortices penetration and a medially maldirected trajectory violating the roof and floor of the lateral recess. Results: The current study included 51 patients distributed as 28 patients (55 %) in group A and 23 patients (45 %) in group B. A total of 262 screws were investigated with 134 (51.15 %) screws in group A and 128 (48.85 %) screws in group B. Cross tabulation of raw data of different screw type distribution among the two patients’ groups preliminarily revealed a quite favorable screws position among group A patients with 94.77% of screws in class 1, 4.48% in class 2 and 0.75% of screws in class 3 compared to 81.25%, 12.5% and 6.25% respectively in group B of patients. However, statistical analysis using Chi Square test for individual screws’ groups related to specific pedicles failed to show any significant difference with each one of the pertinent P-values<0.05. On the other hand, comparison of maldirected screws (classes 2 and 3 collectively) between the two groups confirmed a statistically high significant difference in the number of maldirected screws per patient with a mean of 0.25 screw/patient in group A compared to 1.043 screw/patient in group B (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion technique is an accepted technique regarding screw accuracy when properly indicated having the advantages of being less traumatic and more cosmetic with its inherent complications and drawbacks including financial issues, more radiation exposure and longer operative time. (2017ESJ144) |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background Data: In the late fifties of the last century, Boucher described posterior pedicle screw placement for the first time for treatment of a diversity of spinal pathologies. Currently, there are three methods for pedicle screw placement: the free hand, the fluoroscopy guided open and the percutaneous techniques. Despite being reported safe and accurate, percutaneous pedicle screw insertion is still being investigated in comparison to the traditional open technique. Purpose: In this study, the authors are trying to find out if there was any superiority of one technique regarding accuracy of screw placement. Study Design: This is a retrospective comparative study designed to assess the accuracy of screw placement in the sagittal plane in patients who underwent lumbar transpedicular fixation by open versus percutaneous techniques. Patients and Methods: Patients were categorized into two groups: group A including patients who underwent open surgery and group B patients who underwent percutaneous fixation. Each screw was categorized according to the sagittal plane into one of the following classes: Class 0: with no cortical penetration at all, Class 1: with a single cortical penetration denoting accepted entry point and trajectory, Class 2: with 2 cortices penetration violating the lateral cortex of the pedicle and/or the vertebral body and Class 3: with 3 cortices penetration and a medially maldirected trajectory violating the roof and floor of the lateral recess. Results: The current study included 51 patients distributed as 28 patients (55 %) in group A and 23 patients (45 %) in group B. A total of 262 screws were investigated with 134 (51.15 %) screws in group A and 128 (48.85 %) screws in group B. Cross tabulation of raw data of different screw type distribution among the two patients’ groups preliminarily revealed a quite favorable screws position among group A patients with 94.77% of screws in class 1, 4.48% in class 2 and 0.75% of screws in class 3 compared to 81.25%, 12.5% and 6.25% respectively in group B of patients. However, statistical analysis using Chi Square test for individual screws’ groups related to specific pedicles failed to show any significant difference with each one of the pertinent P-values<0.05. On the other hand, comparison of maldirected screws (classes 2 and 3 collectively) between the two groups confirmed a statistically high significant difference in the number of maldirected screws per patient with a mean of 0.25 screw/patient in group A compared to 1.043 screw/patient in group B (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion technique is an accepted technique regarding screw accuracy when properly indicated having the advantages of being less traumatic and more cosmetic with its inherent complications and drawbacks including financial issues, more radiation exposure and longer operative time. (2017ESJ144) |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model |
| url |
https://doi.org/DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 https://doaj.org/article/a5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498 http://www.esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_6757.html https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950 https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Sherif Morad Ahmed Salem |
| author2Str |
Sherif Morad Ahmed Salem |
| ppnlink |
1760615579 |
| callnumber-subject |
RC - Internal Medicine |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757 |
| callnumber-a |
RC346-429 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T00:50:40.673Z |
| _version_ |
1803607595475271680 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ059772867</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502142930.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ059772867</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC346-429</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ahmad Elayouty</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Accuracy of Screw Placement in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation: A Comparative Study between Open and Percutaneous Techniques Using a Novel Classification Model</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background Data: In the late fifties of the last century, Boucher described posterior pedicle screw placement for the first time for treatment of a diversity of spinal pathologies. Currently, there are three methods for pedicle screw placement: the free hand, the fluoroscopy guided open and the percutaneous techniques. Despite being reported safe and accurate, percutaneous pedicle screw insertion is still being investigated in comparison to the traditional open technique. Purpose: In this study, the authors are trying to find out if there was any superiority of one technique regarding accuracy of screw placement. Study Design: This is a retrospective comparative study designed to assess the accuracy of screw placement in the sagittal plane in patients who underwent lumbar transpedicular fixation by open versus percutaneous techniques. Patients and Methods: Patients were categorized into two groups: group A including patients who underwent open surgery and group B patients who underwent percutaneous fixation. Each screw was categorized according to the sagittal plane into one of the following classes: Class 0: with no cortical penetration at all, Class 1: with a single cortical penetration denoting accepted entry point and trajectory, Class 2: with 2 cortices penetration violating the lateral cortex of the pedicle and/or the vertebral body and Class 3: with 3 cortices penetration and a medially maldirected trajectory violating the roof and floor of the lateral recess. Results: The current study included 51 patients distributed as 28 patients (55 %) in group A and 23 patients (45 %) in group B. A total of 262 screws were investigated with 134 (51.15 %) screws in group A and 128 (48.85 %) screws in group B. Cross tabulation of raw data of different screw type distribution among the two patients’ groups preliminarily revealed a quite favorable screws position among group A patients with 94.77% of screws in class 1, 4.48% in class 2 and 0.75% of screws in class 3 compared to 81.25%, 12.5% and 6.25% respectively in group B of patients. However, statistical analysis using Chi Square test for individual screws’ groups related to specific pedicles failed to show any significant difference with each one of the pertinent P-values<0.05. On the other hand, comparison of maldirected screws (classes 2 and 3 collectively) between the two groups confirmed a statistically high significant difference in the number of maldirected screws per patient with a mean of 0.25 screw/patient in group A compared to 1.043 screw/patient in group B (P-value < 0.001). Conclusion: Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion technique is an accepted technique regarding screw accuracy when properly indicated having the advantages of being less traumatic and more cosmetic with its inherent complications and drawbacks including financial issues, more radiation exposure and longer operative time. (2017ESJ144)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Percutaneous pedicle screw</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">open pedicle screw fixation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pedicle screw accuracy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">lumbar spine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sherif Morad</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ahmed Salem</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Egyptian Spine Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Egyptian Spine Association, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2017), 1, Seite 36-42</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760615579</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)3070355-4</subfield><subfield code="x">23148969</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:36-42</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2017.6757</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a5054e7969d94597a9b79f1ee90d5498</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_6757.html</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">36-42</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4005966 |