The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives
Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. ...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Mohammad Ayub Khan [verfasserIn] Ebner Noam [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research - IEECA, 2014, 5(2018), 1 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:5 ; year:2018 ; number:1 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ060061839 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ060061839 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503110537.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ060061839 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a HF5001-6182 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Mohammad Ayub Khan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Higher education institutions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Internationalization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Self-internationalization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Types of education internationalization | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Business | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ebner Noam |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research |d IEECA, 2014 |g 5(2018), 1 |w (DE-627)1760606340 |x 23288280 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://ieeca.org/journal/index.php/JEECAR/article/view/189 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8272 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8280 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2129 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4046 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 5 |j 2018 |e 1 | ||
| author_variant |
m a k mak e n en |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:23288280:2018----::hslitrainlztomdlivrucnetoaitrainlztomdlcmotentttosfihrdctoar |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
HF |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| allfields |
10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 doi (DE-627)DOAJ060061839 (DE-599)DOAJ5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HF5001-6182 Mohammad Ayub Khan verfasserin aut The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions. Higher education institutions Internationalization Self-internationalization Types of education internationalization Business Ebner Noam verfasserin aut In Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research IEECA, 2014 5(2018), 1 (DE-627)1760606340 23288280 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:1 https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 kostenfrei https://ieeca.org/journal/index.php/JEECAR/article/view/189 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8272 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8280 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 5 2018 1 |
| spelling |
10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 doi (DE-627)DOAJ060061839 (DE-599)DOAJ5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HF5001-6182 Mohammad Ayub Khan verfasserin aut The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions. Higher education institutions Internationalization Self-internationalization Types of education internationalization Business Ebner Noam verfasserin aut In Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research IEECA, 2014 5(2018), 1 (DE-627)1760606340 23288280 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:1 https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 kostenfrei https://ieeca.org/journal/index.php/JEECAR/article/view/189 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8272 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8280 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 5 2018 1 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 doi (DE-627)DOAJ060061839 (DE-599)DOAJ5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HF5001-6182 Mohammad Ayub Khan verfasserin aut The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions. Higher education institutions Internationalization Self-internationalization Types of education internationalization Business Ebner Noam verfasserin aut In Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research IEECA, 2014 5(2018), 1 (DE-627)1760606340 23288280 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:1 https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 kostenfrei https://ieeca.org/journal/index.php/JEECAR/article/view/189 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8272 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8280 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 5 2018 1 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 doi (DE-627)DOAJ060061839 (DE-599)DOAJ5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HF5001-6182 Mohammad Ayub Khan verfasserin aut The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions. Higher education institutions Internationalization Self-internationalization Types of education internationalization Business Ebner Noam verfasserin aut In Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research IEECA, 2014 5(2018), 1 (DE-627)1760606340 23288280 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:1 https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 kostenfrei https://ieeca.org/journal/index.php/JEECAR/article/view/189 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8272 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8280 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 5 2018 1 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 doi (DE-627)DOAJ060061839 (DE-599)DOAJ5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng HF5001-6182 Mohammad Ayub Khan verfasserin aut The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions. Higher education institutions Internationalization Self-internationalization Types of education internationalization Business Ebner Noam verfasserin aut In Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research IEECA, 2014 5(2018), 1 (DE-627)1760606340 23288280 nnns volume:5 year:2018 number:1 https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 kostenfrei https://ieeca.org/journal/index.php/JEECAR/article/view/189 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8272 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8280 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 AR 5 2018 1 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research 5(2018), 1 volume:5 year:2018 number:1 |
| sourceStr |
In Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research 5(2018), 1 volume:5 year:2018 number:1 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Higher education institutions Internationalization Self-internationalization Types of education internationalization Business |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mohammad Ayub Khan @@aut@@ Ebner Noam @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760606340 |
| id |
DOAJ060061839 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ060061839</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503110537.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ060061839</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HF5001-6182</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Ayub Khan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Higher education institutions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Internationalization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Self-internationalization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Types of education internationalization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Business</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ebner Noam</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research</subfield><subfield code="d">IEECA, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2018), 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760606340</subfield><subfield code="x">23288280</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ieeca.org/journal/index.php/JEECAR/article/view/189</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8272</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8280</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
H - Social Science |
| author |
Mohammad Ayub Khan |
| spellingShingle |
Mohammad Ayub Khan misc HF5001-6182 misc Higher education institutions misc Internationalization misc Self-internationalization misc Types of education internationalization misc Business The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives |
| authorStr |
Mohammad Ayub Khan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760606340 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
HF5001-6182 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
23288280 |
| topic_title |
HF5001-6182 The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives Higher education institutions Internationalization Self-internationalization Types of education internationalization |
| topic |
misc HF5001-6182 misc Higher education institutions misc Internationalization misc Self-internationalization misc Types of education internationalization misc Business |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc HF5001-6182 misc Higher education institutions misc Internationalization misc Self-internationalization misc Types of education internationalization misc Business |
| topic_browse |
misc HF5001-6182 misc Higher education institutions misc Internationalization misc Self-internationalization misc Types of education internationalization misc Business |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760606340 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760606340 |
| title |
The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ060061839 (DE-599)DOAJ5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 |
| title_full |
The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives |
| author_sort |
Mohammad Ayub Khan |
| journal |
Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research |
| journalStr |
Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research |
| callnumber-first-code |
H |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2018 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Mohammad Ayub Khan Ebner Noam |
| container_volume |
5 |
| class |
HF5001-6182 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Mohammad Ayub Khan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
self-internationalization model (sim) versus conventional internationalization models (cims) of the institutions of higher education: a preliminary insight from management perspectives |
| callnumber |
HF5001-6182 |
| title_auth |
The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives |
| abstract |
Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions. |
| abstractGer |
Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2129 GBV_ILN_4046 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4126 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 https://doaj.org/article/5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8 https://ieeca.org/journal/index.php/JEECAR/article/view/189 https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8272 https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8280 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Ebner Noam |
| author2Str |
Ebner Noam |
| ppnlink |
1760606340 |
| callnumber-subject |
HF - Commerce |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189 |
| callnumber-a |
HF5001-6182 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:54:15.575Z |
| _version_ |
1803611595683659776 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ060061839</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503110537.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ060061839</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HF5001-6182</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mohammad Ayub Khan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons. The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts. This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave. The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM. SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students. This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM. Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Higher education institutions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Internationalization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Self-internationalization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Types of education internationalization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Business</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ebner Noam</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research</subfield><subfield code="d">IEECA, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2018), 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760606340</subfield><subfield code="x">23288280</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/5e3fd4f5da894ff18e6a6c44542db8d8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://ieeca.org/journal/index.php/JEECAR/article/view/189</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8272</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2328-8280</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2129</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4046</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4007816 |