Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking
The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of pos...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
N. I. Nelyubin [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Russisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета - Kemerovo State University, 2019, 21(2019), 1, Seite 112-120 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:21 ; year:2019 ; number:1 ; pages:112-120 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ060817356 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ060817356 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230309004416.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ060817356 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJf628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a rus | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a DK1-4735 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a BF1-990 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a N. I. Nelyubin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of positivist-oriented approaches. They proved to be connected with building a one-dimensional-instrumental view of a thinking person as a gnoseological subject. The view is often reduced to an operator of cognitive processes, artificially derived from the framework of one’s own historicity and existential datum of life. It reveals the existential-anthropological givenness of human thinking, taken in the context of one’s own life world and one’s own life relationships, as well as in the context of the trans-perspective of becoming and complicating its "cogital identity". The author substantiates the view that thinking of a holistically understood person acts as a form of life-realization, and all thinking events are evidence of one’s attempts to thematisation and constitution of one’s "cogital identity" and resistance to "co- deindividualization". The study revealed a need to expand the research focus of the psychology of thinking, so that its positive heuristics were not limited to the mental apparatus of the averaged operator of cognitive processes, but include existential givenness and the capabilities of a living historical personality that realizes meaningful existential relations with itself and the world in thinking. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a post-non-classical psychology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a anthropology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a being | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cogital identity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a life relationships | |
| 650 | 4 | |a meaning | |
| 653 | 0 | |a History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Psychology | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета |d Kemerovo State University, 2019 |g 21(2019), 1, Seite 112-120 |w (DE-627)1760609846 |x 20788983 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:21 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g pages:112-120 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/f628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/2656 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8975 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8983 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 21 |j 2019 |e 1 |h 112-120 | ||
| author_variant |
n i n nin |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:20788983:2019----::rlgmntteytmnhoooiat |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
DK |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 doi (DE-627)DOAJ060817356 (DE-599)DOAJf628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus DK1-4735 BF1-990 N. I. Nelyubin verfasserin aut Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of positivist-oriented approaches. They proved to be connected with building a one-dimensional-instrumental view of a thinking person as a gnoseological subject. The view is often reduced to an operator of cognitive processes, artificially derived from the framework of one’s own historicity and existential datum of life. It reveals the existential-anthropological givenness of human thinking, taken in the context of one’s own life world and one’s own life relationships, as well as in the context of the trans-perspective of becoming and complicating its "cogital identity". The author substantiates the view that thinking of a holistically understood person acts as a form of life-realization, and all thinking events are evidence of one’s attempts to thematisation and constitution of one’s "cogital identity" and resistance to "co- deindividualization". The study revealed a need to expand the research focus of the psychology of thinking, so that its positive heuristics were not limited to the mental apparatus of the averaged operator of cognitive processes, but include existential givenness and the capabilities of a living historical personality that realizes meaningful existential relations with itself and the world in thinking. post-non-classical psychology anthropology being cogital identity life relationships meaning History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics Psychology In Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета Kemerovo State University, 2019 21(2019), 1, Seite 112-120 (DE-627)1760609846 20788983 nnns volume:21 year:2019 number:1 pages:112-120 https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b kostenfrei https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/2656 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8975 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8983 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 21 2019 1 112-120 |
| spelling |
10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 doi (DE-627)DOAJ060817356 (DE-599)DOAJf628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus DK1-4735 BF1-990 N. I. Nelyubin verfasserin aut Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of positivist-oriented approaches. They proved to be connected with building a one-dimensional-instrumental view of a thinking person as a gnoseological subject. The view is often reduced to an operator of cognitive processes, artificially derived from the framework of one’s own historicity and existential datum of life. It reveals the existential-anthropological givenness of human thinking, taken in the context of one’s own life world and one’s own life relationships, as well as in the context of the trans-perspective of becoming and complicating its "cogital identity". The author substantiates the view that thinking of a holistically understood person acts as a form of life-realization, and all thinking events are evidence of one’s attempts to thematisation and constitution of one’s "cogital identity" and resistance to "co- deindividualization". The study revealed a need to expand the research focus of the psychology of thinking, so that its positive heuristics were not limited to the mental apparatus of the averaged operator of cognitive processes, but include existential givenness and the capabilities of a living historical personality that realizes meaningful existential relations with itself and the world in thinking. post-non-classical psychology anthropology being cogital identity life relationships meaning History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics Psychology In Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета Kemerovo State University, 2019 21(2019), 1, Seite 112-120 (DE-627)1760609846 20788983 nnns volume:21 year:2019 number:1 pages:112-120 https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b kostenfrei https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/2656 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8975 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8983 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 21 2019 1 112-120 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 doi (DE-627)DOAJ060817356 (DE-599)DOAJf628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus DK1-4735 BF1-990 N. I. Nelyubin verfasserin aut Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of positivist-oriented approaches. They proved to be connected with building a one-dimensional-instrumental view of a thinking person as a gnoseological subject. The view is often reduced to an operator of cognitive processes, artificially derived from the framework of one’s own historicity and existential datum of life. It reveals the existential-anthropological givenness of human thinking, taken in the context of one’s own life world and one’s own life relationships, as well as in the context of the trans-perspective of becoming and complicating its "cogital identity". The author substantiates the view that thinking of a holistically understood person acts as a form of life-realization, and all thinking events are evidence of one’s attempts to thematisation and constitution of one’s "cogital identity" and resistance to "co- deindividualization". The study revealed a need to expand the research focus of the psychology of thinking, so that its positive heuristics were not limited to the mental apparatus of the averaged operator of cognitive processes, but include existential givenness and the capabilities of a living historical personality that realizes meaningful existential relations with itself and the world in thinking. post-non-classical psychology anthropology being cogital identity life relationships meaning History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics Psychology In Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета Kemerovo State University, 2019 21(2019), 1, Seite 112-120 (DE-627)1760609846 20788983 nnns volume:21 year:2019 number:1 pages:112-120 https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b kostenfrei https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/2656 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8975 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8983 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 21 2019 1 112-120 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 doi (DE-627)DOAJ060817356 (DE-599)DOAJf628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus DK1-4735 BF1-990 N. I. Nelyubin verfasserin aut Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of positivist-oriented approaches. They proved to be connected with building a one-dimensional-instrumental view of a thinking person as a gnoseological subject. The view is often reduced to an operator of cognitive processes, artificially derived from the framework of one’s own historicity and existential datum of life. It reveals the existential-anthropological givenness of human thinking, taken in the context of one’s own life world and one’s own life relationships, as well as in the context of the trans-perspective of becoming and complicating its "cogital identity". The author substantiates the view that thinking of a holistically understood person acts as a form of life-realization, and all thinking events are evidence of one’s attempts to thematisation and constitution of one’s "cogital identity" and resistance to "co- deindividualization". The study revealed a need to expand the research focus of the psychology of thinking, so that its positive heuristics were not limited to the mental apparatus of the averaged operator of cognitive processes, but include existential givenness and the capabilities of a living historical personality that realizes meaningful existential relations with itself and the world in thinking. post-non-classical psychology anthropology being cogital identity life relationships meaning History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics Psychology In Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета Kemerovo State University, 2019 21(2019), 1, Seite 112-120 (DE-627)1760609846 20788983 nnns volume:21 year:2019 number:1 pages:112-120 https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b kostenfrei https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/2656 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8975 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8983 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 21 2019 1 112-120 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 doi (DE-627)DOAJ060817356 (DE-599)DOAJf628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus DK1-4735 BF1-990 N. I. Nelyubin verfasserin aut Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of positivist-oriented approaches. They proved to be connected with building a one-dimensional-instrumental view of a thinking person as a gnoseological subject. The view is often reduced to an operator of cognitive processes, artificially derived from the framework of one’s own historicity and existential datum of life. It reveals the existential-anthropological givenness of human thinking, taken in the context of one’s own life world and one’s own life relationships, as well as in the context of the trans-perspective of becoming and complicating its "cogital identity". The author substantiates the view that thinking of a holistically understood person acts as a form of life-realization, and all thinking events are evidence of one’s attempts to thematisation and constitution of one’s "cogital identity" and resistance to "co- deindividualization". The study revealed a need to expand the research focus of the psychology of thinking, so that its positive heuristics were not limited to the mental apparatus of the averaged operator of cognitive processes, but include existential givenness and the capabilities of a living historical personality that realizes meaningful existential relations with itself and the world in thinking. post-non-classical psychology anthropology being cogital identity life relationships meaning History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics Psychology In Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета Kemerovo State University, 2019 21(2019), 1, Seite 112-120 (DE-627)1760609846 20788983 nnns volume:21 year:2019 number:1 pages:112-120 https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/f628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b kostenfrei https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/2656 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8975 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8983 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 21 2019 1 112-120 |
| language |
English Russian |
| source |
In Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета 21(2019), 1, Seite 112-120 volume:21 year:2019 number:1 pages:112-120 |
| sourceStr |
In Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета 21(2019), 1, Seite 112-120 volume:21 year:2019 number:1 pages:112-120 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
post-non-classical psychology anthropology being cogital identity life relationships meaning History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics Psychology |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
N. I. Nelyubin @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760609846 |
| id |
DOAJ060817356 |
| language_de |
englisch russisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ060817356</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309004416.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ060817356</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">DK1-4735</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BF1-990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N. I. Nelyubin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of positivist-oriented approaches. They proved to be connected with building a one-dimensional-instrumental view of a thinking person as a gnoseological subject. The view is often reduced to an operator of cognitive processes, artificially derived from the framework of one’s own historicity and existential datum of life. It reveals the existential-anthropological givenness of human thinking, taken in the context of one’s own life world and one’s own life relationships, as well as in the context of the trans-perspective of becoming and complicating its "cogital identity". The author substantiates the view that thinking of a holistically understood person acts as a form of life-realization, and all thinking events are evidence of one’s attempts to thematisation and constitution of one’s "cogital identity" and resistance to "co- deindividualization". The study revealed a need to expand the research focus of the psychology of thinking, so that its positive heuristics were not limited to the mental apparatus of the averaged operator of cognitive processes, but include existential givenness and the capabilities of a living historical personality that realizes meaningful existential relations with itself and the world in thinking.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">post-non-classical psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">anthropology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">being</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cogital identity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">life relationships</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">meaning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета</subfield><subfield code="d">Kemerovo State University, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">21(2019), 1, Seite 112-120</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760609846</subfield><subfield code="x">20788983</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:112-120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/2656</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8975</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8983</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">112-120</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
D - World History |
| author |
N. I. Nelyubin |
| spellingShingle |
N. I. Nelyubin misc DK1-4735 misc BF1-990 misc post-non-classical psychology misc anthropology misc being misc cogital identity misc life relationships misc meaning misc History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics misc Psychology Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking |
| authorStr |
N. I. Nelyubin |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760609846 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
DK1-4735 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
20788983 |
| topic_title |
DK1-4735 BF1-990 Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking post-non-classical psychology anthropology being cogital identity life relationships meaning |
| topic |
misc DK1-4735 misc BF1-990 misc post-non-classical psychology misc anthropology misc being misc cogital identity misc life relationships misc meaning misc History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics misc Psychology |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc DK1-4735 misc BF1-990 misc post-non-classical psychology misc anthropology misc being misc cogital identity misc life relationships misc meaning misc History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics misc Psychology |
| topic_browse |
misc DK1-4735 misc BF1-990 misc post-non-classical psychology misc anthropology misc being misc cogital identity misc life relationships misc meaning misc History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics misc Psychology |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760609846 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760609846 |
| title |
Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ060817356 (DE-599)DOAJf628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b |
| title_full |
Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking |
| author_sort |
N. I. Nelyubin |
| journal |
Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета |
| journalStr |
Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета |
| callnumber-first-code |
D |
| lang_code |
eng rus |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
112 |
| author_browse |
N. I. Nelyubin |
| container_volume |
21 |
| class |
DK1-4735 BF1-990 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
N. I. Nelyubin |
| doi_str_mv |
10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 |
| title_sort |
prolegomena to the system-anthropological theory of thinking |
| callnumber |
DK1-4735 |
| title_auth |
Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking |
| abstract |
The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of positivist-oriented approaches. They proved to be connected with building a one-dimensional-instrumental view of a thinking person as a gnoseological subject. The view is often reduced to an operator of cognitive processes, artificially derived from the framework of one’s own historicity and existential datum of life. It reveals the existential-anthropological givenness of human thinking, taken in the context of one’s own life world and one’s own life relationships, as well as in the context of the trans-perspective of becoming and complicating its "cogital identity". The author substantiates the view that thinking of a holistically understood person acts as a form of life-realization, and all thinking events are evidence of one’s attempts to thematisation and constitution of one’s "cogital identity" and resistance to "co- deindividualization". The study revealed a need to expand the research focus of the psychology of thinking, so that its positive heuristics were not limited to the mental apparatus of the averaged operator of cognitive processes, but include existential givenness and the capabilities of a living historical personality that realizes meaningful existential relations with itself and the world in thinking. |
| abstractGer |
The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of positivist-oriented approaches. They proved to be connected with building a one-dimensional-instrumental view of a thinking person as a gnoseological subject. The view is often reduced to an operator of cognitive processes, artificially derived from the framework of one’s own historicity and existential datum of life. It reveals the existential-anthropological givenness of human thinking, taken in the context of one’s own life world and one’s own life relationships, as well as in the context of the trans-perspective of becoming and complicating its "cogital identity". The author substantiates the view that thinking of a holistically understood person acts as a form of life-realization, and all thinking events are evidence of one’s attempts to thematisation and constitution of one’s "cogital identity" and resistance to "co- deindividualization". The study revealed a need to expand the research focus of the psychology of thinking, so that its positive heuristics were not limited to the mental apparatus of the averaged operator of cognitive processes, but include existential givenness and the capabilities of a living historical personality that realizes meaningful existential relations with itself and the world in thinking. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of positivist-oriented approaches. They proved to be connected with building a one-dimensional-instrumental view of a thinking person as a gnoseological subject. The view is often reduced to an operator of cognitive processes, artificially derived from the framework of one’s own historicity and existential datum of life. It reveals the existential-anthropological givenness of human thinking, taken in the context of one’s own life world and one’s own life relationships, as well as in the context of the trans-perspective of becoming and complicating its "cogital identity". The author substantiates the view that thinking of a holistically understood person acts as a form of life-realization, and all thinking events are evidence of one’s attempts to thematisation and constitution of one’s "cogital identity" and resistance to "co- deindividualization". The study revealed a need to expand the research focus of the psychology of thinking, so that its positive heuristics were not limited to the mental apparatus of the averaged operator of cognitive processes, but include existential givenness and the capabilities of a living historical personality that realizes meaningful existential relations with itself and the world in thinking. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 https://doaj.org/article/f628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/2656 https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8975 https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8983 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760609846 |
| callnumber-subject |
DK - Russia, Soviet Union, Former Soviet Republics, Poland |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120 |
| callnumber-a |
DK1-4735 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T17:12:09.128Z |
| _version_ |
1803578747529461760 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ060817356</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309004416.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ060817356</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJf628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">DK1-4735</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BF1-990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">N. I. Nelyubin</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Prolegomena to the System-Anthropological Theory of Thinking</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article features preliminary "conceptual optics" necessary for understanding the problem of thinking from the perspective of post- non-classical psychology. The study focused on methodological gaps in the formulation and solution of the problem of thinking within the framework of positivist-oriented approaches. They proved to be connected with building a one-dimensional-instrumental view of a thinking person as a gnoseological subject. The view is often reduced to an operator of cognitive processes, artificially derived from the framework of one’s own historicity and existential datum of life. It reveals the existential-anthropological givenness of human thinking, taken in the context of one’s own life world and one’s own life relationships, as well as in the context of the trans-perspective of becoming and complicating its "cogital identity". The author substantiates the view that thinking of a holistically understood person acts as a form of life-realization, and all thinking events are evidence of one’s attempts to thematisation and constitution of one’s "cogital identity" and resistance to "co- deindividualization". The study revealed a need to expand the research focus of the psychology of thinking, so that its positive heuristics were not limited to the mental apparatus of the averaged operator of cognitive processes, but include existential givenness and the capabilities of a living historical personality that realizes meaningful existential relations with itself and the world in thinking.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">post-non-classical psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">anthropology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">being</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cogital identity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">life relationships</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">meaning</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">History of Russia. Soviet Union. Former Soviet Republics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета</subfield><subfield code="d">Kemerovo State University, 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">21(2019), 1, Seite 112-120</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760609846</subfield><subfield code="x">20788983</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:21</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:112-120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2019-21-1-112-120</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/f628833fa15c4c83b61bf7d226f4ef8b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://vestnik.kemsu.ru/jour/article/view/2656</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8975</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2078-8983</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">21</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">112-120</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.399867 |