A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer

Shilin He,1,* Tunan Yu,1,* Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo,2,3 Liuxin Cai,1 Yeyuan Chu,4 Fangqiang Wei,5 Xiao Liang1 1Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Monash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiao LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-571-8600-6605Email srrshlxzju.edu.cnPurpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma, simultaneous surgery, salvage surgery, prognosis Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	He S [verfasserIn] Yu T [verfasserIn] Khadaroo PA [verfasserIn] Cai L [verfasserIn] Chu Y [verfasserIn] Wei F [verfasserIn] Liang X [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	incidental gallbladder carcinoma simultaneous surgery salvage surgery prognosis

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Cancer Management and Research - Dove Medical Press, 2009, (2020), Seite 13469-13478
Übergeordnetes Werk:	year:2020 ; pages:13469-13478

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ06130008X

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ06130008X
003	DE-627
005	20230502154754.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ06130008X
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJb3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RC254-282
100	0		\|a He S \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	2	\|a A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Shilin He,1,* Tunan Yu,1,* Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo,2,3 Liuxin Cai,1 Yeyuan Chu,4 Fangqiang Wei,5 Xiao Liang1 1Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Monash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiao LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-571-8600-6605Email srrshlxzju.edu.cnPurpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma, simultaneous surgery, salvage surgery, prognosis
650		4	\|a incidental gallbladder carcinoma
650		4	\|a simultaneous surgery
650		4	\|a salvage surgery
650		4	\|a prognosis
653		0	\|a Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
700	0		\|a Yu T \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Khadaroo PA \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Cai L \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Chu Y \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Wei F \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Liang X \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Cancer Management and Research \|d Dove Medical Press, 2009 \|g (2020), Seite 13469-13478 \|w (DE-627)606030840 \|w (DE-600)2508013-1 \|x 11791322 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g year:2020 \|g pages:13469-13478
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/b3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-between-the-prognosis-of-simultaneous-and-salvage-radical-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1322 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|j 2020 \|h 13469-13478

Indexfelder

author_variant	h s hs y t yt k p kp c l cl c y cy w f wf l x lx
matchkey_str	article:11791322:2020----::cmaiobtenhponssfiutnosnslaeaiarscinn
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
callnumber-subject-code	RC
publishDate	2020
allfields	(DE-627)DOAJ06130008X (DE-599)DOAJb3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC254-282 He S verfasserin aut A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Shilin He,1,* Tunan Yu,1,* Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo,2,3 Liuxin Cai,1 Yeyuan Chu,4 Fangqiang Wei,5 Xiao Liang1 1Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Monash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiao LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-571-8600-6605Email srrshlxzju.edu.cnPurpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma, simultaneous surgery, salvage surgery, prognosis incidental gallbladder carcinoma simultaneous surgery salvage surgery prognosis Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Yu T verfasserin aut Khadaroo PA verfasserin aut Cai L verfasserin aut Chu Y verfasserin aut Wei F verfasserin aut Liang X verfasserin aut In Cancer Management and Research Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2020), Seite 13469-13478 (DE-627)606030840 (DE-600)2508013-1 11791322 nnns year:2020 pages:13469-13478 https://doaj.org/article/b3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-between-the-prognosis-of-simultaneous-and-salvage-radical-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1322 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 13469-13478
spelling	(DE-627)DOAJ06130008X (DE-599)DOAJb3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC254-282 He S verfasserin aut A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Shilin He,1,* Tunan Yu,1,* Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo,2,3 Liuxin Cai,1 Yeyuan Chu,4 Fangqiang Wei,5 Xiao Liang1 1Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Monash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiao LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-571-8600-6605Email srrshlxzju.edu.cnPurpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma, simultaneous surgery, salvage surgery, prognosis incidental gallbladder carcinoma simultaneous surgery salvage surgery prognosis Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Yu T verfasserin aut Khadaroo PA verfasserin aut Cai L verfasserin aut Chu Y verfasserin aut Wei F verfasserin aut Liang X verfasserin aut In Cancer Management and Research Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2020), Seite 13469-13478 (DE-627)606030840 (DE-600)2508013-1 11791322 nnns year:2020 pages:13469-13478 https://doaj.org/article/b3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-between-the-prognosis-of-simultaneous-and-salvage-radical-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1322 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 13469-13478
allfields_unstemmed	(DE-627)DOAJ06130008X (DE-599)DOAJb3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC254-282 He S verfasserin aut A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Shilin He,1,* Tunan Yu,1,* Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo,2,3 Liuxin Cai,1 Yeyuan Chu,4 Fangqiang Wei,5 Xiao Liang1 1Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Monash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiao LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-571-8600-6605Email srrshlxzju.edu.cnPurpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma, simultaneous surgery, salvage surgery, prognosis incidental gallbladder carcinoma simultaneous surgery salvage surgery prognosis Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Yu T verfasserin aut Khadaroo PA verfasserin aut Cai L verfasserin aut Chu Y verfasserin aut Wei F verfasserin aut Liang X verfasserin aut In Cancer Management and Research Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2020), Seite 13469-13478 (DE-627)606030840 (DE-600)2508013-1 11791322 nnns year:2020 pages:13469-13478 https://doaj.org/article/b3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-between-the-prognosis-of-simultaneous-and-salvage-radical-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1322 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 13469-13478
allfieldsGer	(DE-627)DOAJ06130008X (DE-599)DOAJb3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC254-282 He S verfasserin aut A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Shilin He,1,* Tunan Yu,1,* Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo,2,3 Liuxin Cai,1 Yeyuan Chu,4 Fangqiang Wei,5 Xiao Liang1 1Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Monash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiao LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-571-8600-6605Email srrshlxzju.edu.cnPurpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma, simultaneous surgery, salvage surgery, prognosis incidental gallbladder carcinoma simultaneous surgery salvage surgery prognosis Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Yu T verfasserin aut Khadaroo PA verfasserin aut Cai L verfasserin aut Chu Y verfasserin aut Wei F verfasserin aut Liang X verfasserin aut In Cancer Management and Research Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2020), Seite 13469-13478 (DE-627)606030840 (DE-600)2508013-1 11791322 nnns year:2020 pages:13469-13478 https://doaj.org/article/b3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-between-the-prognosis-of-simultaneous-and-salvage-radical-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1322 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 13469-13478
allfieldsSound	(DE-627)DOAJ06130008X (DE-599)DOAJb3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC254-282 He S verfasserin aut A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Shilin He,1,* Tunan Yu,1,* Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo,2,3 Liuxin Cai,1 Yeyuan Chu,4 Fangqiang Wei,5 Xiao Liang1 1Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Monash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiao LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-571-8600-6605Email srrshlxzju.edu.cnPurpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma, simultaneous surgery, salvage surgery, prognosis incidental gallbladder carcinoma simultaneous surgery salvage surgery prognosis Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens Yu T verfasserin aut Khadaroo PA verfasserin aut Cai L verfasserin aut Chu Y verfasserin aut Wei F verfasserin aut Liang X verfasserin aut In Cancer Management and Research Dove Medical Press, 2009 (2020), Seite 13469-13478 (DE-627)606030840 (DE-600)2508013-1 11791322 nnns year:2020 pages:13469-13478 https://doaj.org/article/b3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7 kostenfrei https://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-between-the-prognosis-of-simultaneous-and-salvage-radical-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1322 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 13469-13478
language	English
source	In Cancer Management and Research (2020), Seite 13469-13478 year:2020 pages:13469-13478
sourceStr	In Cancer Management and Research (2020), Seite 13469-13478 year:2020 pages:13469-13478
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	incidental gallbladder carcinoma simultaneous surgery salvage surgery prognosis Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Cancer Management and Research
authorswithroles_txt_mv	He S @@aut@@ Yu T @@aut@@ Khadaroo PA @@aut@@ Cai L @@aut@@ Chu Y @@aut@@ Wei F @@aut@@ Liang X @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	606030840
id	DOAJ06130008X
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ06130008X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502154754.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ06130008X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC254-282</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">He S</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shilin He,1,* Tunan Yu,1,* Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo,2,3 Liuxin Cai,1 Yeyuan Chu,4 Fangqiang Wei,5 Xiao Liang1 1Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People&rsquo;s Republic of China; 2Monash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People&rsquo;s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People&rsquo;s Republic of China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People&rsquo;s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People&rsquo;s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiao LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People&rsquo;s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-571-8600-6605Email srrshlxzju.edu.cnPurpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan&ndash;Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P &lt; 0.05). Kaplan&ndash;Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma, simultaneous surgery, salvage surgery, prognosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">incidental gallbladder carcinoma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">simultaneous surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">salvage surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prognosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yu T</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khadaroo PA</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cai L</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chu Y</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wei F</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liang X</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Cancer Management and Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Dove Medical Press, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">(2020), Seite 13469-13478</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)606030840</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2508013-1</subfield><subfield code="x">11791322</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:13469-13478</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-between-the-prognosis-of-simultaneous-and-salvage-radical-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1322</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">13469-13478</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	He S
spellingShingle	He S misc RC254-282 misc incidental gallbladder carcinoma misc simultaneous surgery misc salvage surgery misc prognosis misc Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer
authorStr	He S
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)606030840
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RC254-282
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	11791322
topic_title	RC254-282 A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer incidental gallbladder carcinoma simultaneous surgery salvage surgery prognosis
topic	misc RC254-282 misc incidental gallbladder carcinoma misc simultaneous surgery misc salvage surgery misc prognosis misc Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
topic_unstemmed	misc RC254-282 misc incidental gallbladder carcinoma misc simultaneous surgery misc salvage surgery misc prognosis misc Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
topic_browse	misc RC254-282 misc incidental gallbladder carcinoma misc simultaneous surgery misc salvage surgery misc prognosis misc Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Cancer Management and Research
hierarchy_parent_id	606030840
hierarchy_top_title	Cancer Management and Research
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)606030840 (DE-600)2508013-1
title	A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ06130008X (DE-599)DOAJb3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7
title_full	A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer
author_sort	He S
journal	Cancer Management and Research
journalStr	Cancer Management and Research
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	13469
author_browse	He S Yu T Khadaroo PA Cai L Chu Y Wei F Liang X
class	RC254-282
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	He S
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	comparison between the prognosis of simultaneous and salvage radical resection in incidental gallbladder cancer
callnumber	RC254-282
title_auth	A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer
abstract	Shilin He,1,* Tunan Yu,1,* Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo,2,3 Liuxin Cai,1 Yeyuan Chu,4 Fangqiang Wei,5 Xiao Liang1 1Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Monash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiao LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-571-8600-6605Email srrshlxzju.edu.cnPurpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma, simultaneous surgery, salvage surgery, prognosis
abstractGer	Shilin He,1,* Tunan Yu,1,* Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo,2,3 Liuxin Cai,1 Yeyuan Chu,4 Fangqiang Wei,5 Xiao Liang1 1Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Monash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiao LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-571-8600-6605Email srrshlxzju.edu.cnPurpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma, simultaneous surgery, salvage surgery, prognosis
abstract_unstemmed	Shilin He,1,* Tunan Yu,1,* Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo,2,3 Liuxin Cai,1 Yeyuan Chu,4 Fangqiang Wei,5 Xiao Liang1 1Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Monash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiao LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-571-8600-6605Email srrshlxzju.edu.cnPurpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma, simultaneous surgery, salvage surgery, prognosis
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer
url	https://doaj.org/article/b3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7 https://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-between-the-prognosis-of-simultaneous-and-salvage-radical-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1322
remote_bool	true
author2	Yu T Khadaroo PA Cai L Chu Y Wei F Liang X
author2Str	Yu T Khadaroo PA Cai L Chu Y Wei F Liang X
ppnlink	606030840
callnumber-subject	RC - Internal Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
callnumber-a	RC254-282
up_date	2024-07-03T19:57:31.976Z
_version_	1803589152393920512
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ06130008X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502154754.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ06130008X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC254-282</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">He S</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Shilin He,1,* Tunan Yu,1,* Parikshit Asutosh Khadaroo,2,3 Liuxin Cai,1 Yeyuan Chu,4 Fangqiang Wei,5 Xiao Liang1 1Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People&rsquo;s Republic of China; 2Monash University, School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Australia; 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People&rsquo;s Republic of China; 4School of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People&rsquo;s Republic of China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People&rsquo;s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People&rsquo;s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiao LiangDepartment of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People&rsquo;s Republic of ChinaTel/Fax +86-571-8600-6605Email srrshlxzju.edu.cnPurpose: Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan&ndash;Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.Results: Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P &lt; 0.05). Kaplan&ndash;Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).Conclusion: Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.Keywords: incidental gallbladder carcinoma, simultaneous surgery, salvage surgery, prognosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">incidental gallbladder carcinoma</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">simultaneous surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">salvage surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prognosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yu T</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Khadaroo PA</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cai L</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chu Y</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wei F</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Liang X</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Cancer Management and Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Dove Medical Press, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">(2020), Seite 13469-13478</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)606030840</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2508013-1</subfield><subfield code="x">11791322</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:13469-13478</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b3fd7a57ebc14811ae50352fd4e20ad7</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.dovepress.com/a-comparison-between-the-prognosis-of-simultaneous-and-salvage-radical-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1179-1322</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="h">13469-13478</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3993473

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?