Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance
Assessing ecosystem states quantitatively or qualitatively is important for ecosystem management. Currently, Traditional Comprehensive Assessment (TCA), including ecosystem health, risk, and service assessment is used most often. Ecosystem stability theory (EST) and ecosystem regime shift theory (RS...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Jia-Nan Meng [verfasserIn] Hongwei Fang [verfasserIn] Donald Scavia [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2021 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Ecological Indicators - Elsevier, 2021, 125(2021), Seite 107529- |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:125 ; year:2021 ; pages:107529- |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ062993852 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ062993852 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230309024206.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230228s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ062993852 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a QH540-549.5 | |
100 | 0 | |a Jia-Nan Meng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Assessing ecosystem states quantitatively or qualitatively is important for ecosystem management. Currently, Traditional Comprehensive Assessment (TCA), including ecosystem health, risk, and service assessment is used most often. Ecosystem stability theory (EST) and ecosystem regime shift theory (RST) from mathematical ecology have not been widely used. In this paper, we compare TCA and EST and RST result using two lakes, Onondaga Lake and Poyang Lake, as case studies. We find that biological oxygen demand (BOD) could be a suitable variable to calculate temporal stability and variance indexes in EST and RST, and trend in general. The result could replace TCA when the key lake driver is not too extreme. This recommendation is preliminary, needing validated with data. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Ecosystem assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a Comprehensive assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a Ecosystem stability | |
650 | 4 | |a Regime shift | |
653 | 0 | |a Ecology | |
700 | 0 | |a Hongwei Fang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Donald Scavia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Ecological Indicators |d Elsevier, 2021 |g 125(2021), Seite 107529- |w (DE-627)338074163 |w (DE-600)2063587-4 |x 18727034 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:125 |g year:2021 |g pages:107529- |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21001941 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_224 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2004 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2008 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2025 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2044 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2048 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2064 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2106 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2122 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2143 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2152 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2153 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2232 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2336 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4251 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 125 |j 2021 |h 107529- |
author_variant |
j n m jnm h f hf d s ds |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:18727034:2021----::plctooeoytmtbltadeiehftereieoytmsesetacltov |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
callnumber-subject-code |
QH |
publishDate |
2021 |
allfields |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 doi (DE-627)DOAJ062993852 (DE-599)DOAJ807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Jia-Nan Meng verfasserin aut Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Assessing ecosystem states quantitatively or qualitatively is important for ecosystem management. Currently, Traditional Comprehensive Assessment (TCA), including ecosystem health, risk, and service assessment is used most often. Ecosystem stability theory (EST) and ecosystem regime shift theory (RST) from mathematical ecology have not been widely used. In this paper, we compare TCA and EST and RST result using two lakes, Onondaga Lake and Poyang Lake, as case studies. We find that biological oxygen demand (BOD) could be a suitable variable to calculate temporal stability and variance indexes in EST and RST, and trend in general. The result could replace TCA when the key lake driver is not too extreme. This recommendation is preliminary, needing validated with data. Ecosystem assessment Comprehensive assessment Ecosystem stability Regime shift Ecology Hongwei Fang verfasserin aut Donald Scavia verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 125(2021), Seite 107529- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:125 year:2021 pages:107529- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21001941 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 125 2021 107529- |
spelling |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 doi (DE-627)DOAJ062993852 (DE-599)DOAJ807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Jia-Nan Meng verfasserin aut Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Assessing ecosystem states quantitatively or qualitatively is important for ecosystem management. Currently, Traditional Comprehensive Assessment (TCA), including ecosystem health, risk, and service assessment is used most often. Ecosystem stability theory (EST) and ecosystem regime shift theory (RST) from mathematical ecology have not been widely used. In this paper, we compare TCA and EST and RST result using two lakes, Onondaga Lake and Poyang Lake, as case studies. We find that biological oxygen demand (BOD) could be a suitable variable to calculate temporal stability and variance indexes in EST and RST, and trend in general. The result could replace TCA when the key lake driver is not too extreme. This recommendation is preliminary, needing validated with data. Ecosystem assessment Comprehensive assessment Ecosystem stability Regime shift Ecology Hongwei Fang verfasserin aut Donald Scavia verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 125(2021), Seite 107529- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:125 year:2021 pages:107529- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21001941 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 125 2021 107529- |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 doi (DE-627)DOAJ062993852 (DE-599)DOAJ807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Jia-Nan Meng verfasserin aut Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Assessing ecosystem states quantitatively or qualitatively is important for ecosystem management. Currently, Traditional Comprehensive Assessment (TCA), including ecosystem health, risk, and service assessment is used most often. Ecosystem stability theory (EST) and ecosystem regime shift theory (RST) from mathematical ecology have not been widely used. In this paper, we compare TCA and EST and RST result using two lakes, Onondaga Lake and Poyang Lake, as case studies. We find that biological oxygen demand (BOD) could be a suitable variable to calculate temporal stability and variance indexes in EST and RST, and trend in general. The result could replace TCA when the key lake driver is not too extreme. This recommendation is preliminary, needing validated with data. Ecosystem assessment Comprehensive assessment Ecosystem stability Regime shift Ecology Hongwei Fang verfasserin aut Donald Scavia verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 125(2021), Seite 107529- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:125 year:2021 pages:107529- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21001941 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 125 2021 107529- |
allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 doi (DE-627)DOAJ062993852 (DE-599)DOAJ807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Jia-Nan Meng verfasserin aut Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Assessing ecosystem states quantitatively or qualitatively is important for ecosystem management. Currently, Traditional Comprehensive Assessment (TCA), including ecosystem health, risk, and service assessment is used most often. Ecosystem stability theory (EST) and ecosystem regime shift theory (RST) from mathematical ecology have not been widely used. In this paper, we compare TCA and EST and RST result using two lakes, Onondaga Lake and Poyang Lake, as case studies. We find that biological oxygen demand (BOD) could be a suitable variable to calculate temporal stability and variance indexes in EST and RST, and trend in general. The result could replace TCA when the key lake driver is not too extreme. This recommendation is preliminary, needing validated with data. Ecosystem assessment Comprehensive assessment Ecosystem stability Regime shift Ecology Hongwei Fang verfasserin aut Donald Scavia verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 125(2021), Seite 107529- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:125 year:2021 pages:107529- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21001941 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 125 2021 107529- |
allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 doi (DE-627)DOAJ062993852 (DE-599)DOAJ807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng QH540-549.5 Jia-Nan Meng verfasserin aut Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Assessing ecosystem states quantitatively or qualitatively is important for ecosystem management. Currently, Traditional Comprehensive Assessment (TCA), including ecosystem health, risk, and service assessment is used most often. Ecosystem stability theory (EST) and ecosystem regime shift theory (RST) from mathematical ecology have not been widely used. In this paper, we compare TCA and EST and RST result using two lakes, Onondaga Lake and Poyang Lake, as case studies. We find that biological oxygen demand (BOD) could be a suitable variable to calculate temporal stability and variance indexes in EST and RST, and trend in general. The result could replace TCA when the key lake driver is not too extreme. This recommendation is preliminary, needing validated with data. Ecosystem assessment Comprehensive assessment Ecosystem stability Regime shift Ecology Hongwei Fang verfasserin aut Donald Scavia verfasserin aut In Ecological Indicators Elsevier, 2021 125(2021), Seite 107529- (DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 18727034 nnns volume:125 year:2021 pages:107529- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21001941 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 125 2021 107529- |
language |
English |
source |
In Ecological Indicators 125(2021), Seite 107529- volume:125 year:2021 pages:107529- |
sourceStr |
In Ecological Indicators 125(2021), Seite 107529- volume:125 year:2021 pages:107529- |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Ecosystem assessment Comprehensive assessment Ecosystem stability Regime shift Ecology |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Ecological Indicators |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Jia-Nan Meng @@aut@@ Hongwei Fang @@aut@@ Donald Scavia @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
338074163 |
id |
DOAJ062993852 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ062993852</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309024206.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ062993852</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH540-549.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jia-Nan Meng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Assessing ecosystem states quantitatively or qualitatively is important for ecosystem management. Currently, Traditional Comprehensive Assessment (TCA), including ecosystem health, risk, and service assessment is used most often. Ecosystem stability theory (EST) and ecosystem regime shift theory (RST) from mathematical ecology have not been widely used. In this paper, we compare TCA and EST and RST result using two lakes, Onondaga Lake and Poyang Lake, as case studies. We find that biological oxygen demand (BOD) could be a suitable variable to calculate temporal stability and variance indexes in EST and RST, and trend in general. The result could replace TCA when the key lake driver is not too extreme. This recommendation is preliminary, needing validated with data.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ecosystem assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comprehensive assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ecosystem stability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Regime shift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hongwei Fang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Donald Scavia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecological Indicators</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">125(2021), Seite 107529-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)338074163</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2063587-4</subfield><subfield code="x">18727034</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:125</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:107529-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21001941</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">125</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">107529-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
Q - Science |
author |
Jia-Nan Meng |
spellingShingle |
Jia-Nan Meng misc QH540-549.5 misc Ecosystem assessment misc Comprehensive assessment misc Ecosystem stability misc Regime shift misc Ecology Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance |
authorStr |
Jia-Nan Meng |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)338074163 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
QH540-549 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
18727034 |
topic_title |
QH540-549.5 Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance Ecosystem assessment Comprehensive assessment Ecosystem stability Regime shift |
topic |
misc QH540-549.5 misc Ecosystem assessment misc Comprehensive assessment misc Ecosystem stability misc Regime shift misc Ecology |
topic_unstemmed |
misc QH540-549.5 misc Ecosystem assessment misc Comprehensive assessment misc Ecosystem stability misc Regime shift misc Ecology |
topic_browse |
misc QH540-549.5 misc Ecosystem assessment misc Comprehensive assessment misc Ecosystem stability misc Regime shift misc Ecology |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Ecological Indicators |
hierarchy_parent_id |
338074163 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Ecological Indicators |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)338074163 (DE-600)2063587-4 |
title |
Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ062993852 (DE-599)DOAJ807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 |
title_full |
Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance |
author_sort |
Jia-Nan Meng |
journal |
Ecological Indicators |
journalStr |
Ecological Indicators |
callnumber-first-code |
Q |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2021 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
107529 |
author_browse |
Jia-Nan Meng Hongwei Fang Donald Scavia |
container_volume |
125 |
class |
QH540-549.5 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Jia-Nan Meng |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance |
callnumber |
QH540-549.5 |
title_auth |
Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance |
abstract |
Assessing ecosystem states quantitatively or qualitatively is important for ecosystem management. Currently, Traditional Comprehensive Assessment (TCA), including ecosystem health, risk, and service assessment is used most often. Ecosystem stability theory (EST) and ecosystem regime shift theory (RST) from mathematical ecology have not been widely used. In this paper, we compare TCA and EST and RST result using two lakes, Onondaga Lake and Poyang Lake, as case studies. We find that biological oxygen demand (BOD) could be a suitable variable to calculate temporal stability and variance indexes in EST and RST, and trend in general. The result could replace TCA when the key lake driver is not too extreme. This recommendation is preliminary, needing validated with data. |
abstractGer |
Assessing ecosystem states quantitatively or qualitatively is important for ecosystem management. Currently, Traditional Comprehensive Assessment (TCA), including ecosystem health, risk, and service assessment is used most often. Ecosystem stability theory (EST) and ecosystem regime shift theory (RST) from mathematical ecology have not been widely used. In this paper, we compare TCA and EST and RST result using two lakes, Onondaga Lake and Poyang Lake, as case studies. We find that biological oxygen demand (BOD) could be a suitable variable to calculate temporal stability and variance indexes in EST and RST, and trend in general. The result could replace TCA when the key lake driver is not too extreme. This recommendation is preliminary, needing validated with data. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Assessing ecosystem states quantitatively or qualitatively is important for ecosystem management. Currently, Traditional Comprehensive Assessment (TCA), including ecosystem health, risk, and service assessment is used most often. Ecosystem stability theory (EST) and ecosystem regime shift theory (RST) from mathematical ecology have not been widely used. In this paper, we compare TCA and EST and RST result using two lakes, Onondaga Lake and Poyang Lake, as case studies. We find that biological oxygen demand (BOD) could be a suitable variable to calculate temporal stability and variance indexes in EST and RST, and trend in general. The result could replace TCA when the key lake driver is not too extreme. This recommendation is preliminary, needing validated with data. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_224 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2004 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2008 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2025 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2044 GBV_ILN_2048 GBV_ILN_2064 GBV_ILN_2106 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2112 GBV_ILN_2122 GBV_ILN_2143 GBV_ILN_2152 GBV_ILN_2153 GBV_ILN_2232 GBV_ILN_2336 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4251 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
title_short |
Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 https://doaj.org/article/807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21001941 https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Hongwei Fang Donald Scavia |
author2Str |
Hongwei Fang Donald Scavia |
ppnlink |
338074163 |
callnumber-subject |
QH - Natural History and Biology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529 |
callnumber-a |
QH540-549.5 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:15:30.690Z |
_version_ |
1803571409130094592 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ062993852</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309024206.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ062993852</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH540-549.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jia-Nan Meng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Application of ecosystem stability and regime shift theories in ecosystem assessment-calculation variable and practical performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Assessing ecosystem states quantitatively or qualitatively is important for ecosystem management. Currently, Traditional Comprehensive Assessment (TCA), including ecosystem health, risk, and service assessment is used most often. Ecosystem stability theory (EST) and ecosystem regime shift theory (RST) from mathematical ecology have not been widely used. In this paper, we compare TCA and EST and RST result using two lakes, Onondaga Lake and Poyang Lake, as case studies. We find that biological oxygen demand (BOD) could be a suitable variable to calculate temporal stability and variance indexes in EST and RST, and trend in general. The result could replace TCA when the key lake driver is not too extreme. This recommendation is preliminary, needing validated with data.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ecosystem assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comprehensive assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ecosystem stability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Regime shift</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ecology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hongwei Fang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Donald Scavia</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ecological Indicators</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">125(2021), Seite 107529-</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)338074163</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2063587-4</subfield><subfield code="x">18727034</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:125</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:107529-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107529</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/807aea77cb154956875de669a4a64d11</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X21001941</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1470-160X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_224</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2025</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2044</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2048</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2064</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2106</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2122</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2232</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2336</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4251</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">125</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="h">107529-</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4001713 |