Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying
The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Aldemir Chaim [verfasserIn] Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa [verfasserIn] João Camargo Neto [verfasserIn] Luiz Carlos Hermes [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; Spanisch ; Portugiesisch |
Erschienen: |
2002 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira - Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004, 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:37 ; year:2002 ; number:4 ; pages:493-496 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ063044005 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ063044005 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230309024453.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230228s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ063044005 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a spa |a por | ||
050 | 0 | |a S1-972 | |
100 | 0 | |a Aldemir Chaim |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying |
264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. | ||
650 | 4 | |a agricultural chemicals | |
650 | 4 | |a aerial application | |
650 | 4 | |a application methods | |
650 | 4 | |a density | |
650 | 4 | |a volume | |
653 | 0 | |a Agriculture (General) | |
700 | 0 | |a Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a João Camargo Neto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Luiz Carlos Hermes |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |d Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 |g 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 |w (DE-627)331758326 |w (DE-600)2053197-7 |x 16783921 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:37 |g year:2002 |g number:4 |g pages:493-496 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 37 |j 2002 |e 4 |h 493-496 |
author_variant |
a c ac m c p y p mcpyp j c n jcn l c h lch |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:16783921:2002----::oprsnfirsoimtoadopttoapormopsiieeo |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2002 |
callnumber-subject-code |
S |
publishDate |
2002 |
allfields |
10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063044005 (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Aldemir Chaim verfasserin aut Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying 2002 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume Agriculture (General) Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa verfasserin aut João Camargo Neto verfasserin aut Luiz Carlos Hermes verfasserin aut In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2002 4 493-496 |
spelling |
10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063044005 (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Aldemir Chaim verfasserin aut Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying 2002 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume Agriculture (General) Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa verfasserin aut João Camargo Neto verfasserin aut Luiz Carlos Hermes verfasserin aut In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2002 4 493-496 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063044005 (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Aldemir Chaim verfasserin aut Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying 2002 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume Agriculture (General) Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa verfasserin aut João Camargo Neto verfasserin aut Luiz Carlos Hermes verfasserin aut In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2002 4 493-496 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063044005 (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Aldemir Chaim verfasserin aut Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying 2002 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume Agriculture (General) Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa verfasserin aut João Camargo Neto verfasserin aut Luiz Carlos Hermes verfasserin aut In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2002 4 493-496 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063044005 (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Aldemir Chaim verfasserin aut Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying 2002 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume Agriculture (General) Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa verfasserin aut João Camargo Neto verfasserin aut Luiz Carlos Hermes verfasserin aut In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2002 4 493-496 |
language |
English Spanish Portuguese |
source |
In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496 |
sourceStr |
In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume Agriculture (General) |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Aldemir Chaim @@aut@@ Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa @@aut@@ João Camargo Neto @@aut@@ Luiz Carlos Hermes @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2002-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
331758326 |
id |
DOAJ063044005 |
language_de |
englisch spanisch portugiesisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ063044005</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309024453.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ063044005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S1-972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aldemir Chaim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">agricultural chemicals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aerial application</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">application methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">density</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">volume</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">João Camargo Neto</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luiz Carlos Hermes</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira</subfield><subfield code="d">Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)331758326</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2053197-7</subfield><subfield code="x">16783921</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:37</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2002</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:493-496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">37</subfield><subfield code="j">2002</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">493-496</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
S - Agriculture |
author |
Aldemir Chaim |
spellingShingle |
Aldemir Chaim misc S1-972 misc agricultural chemicals misc aerial application misc application methods misc density misc volume misc Agriculture (General) Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying |
authorStr |
Aldemir Chaim |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)331758326 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
S1-972 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
16783921 |
topic_title |
S1-972 Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume |
topic |
misc S1-972 misc agricultural chemicals misc aerial application misc application methods misc density misc volume misc Agriculture (General) |
topic_unstemmed |
misc S1-972 misc agricultural chemicals misc aerial application misc application methods misc density misc volume misc Agriculture (General) |
topic_browse |
misc S1-972 misc agricultural chemicals misc aerial application misc application methods misc density misc volume misc Agriculture (General) |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
hierarchy_parent_id |
331758326 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 |
title |
Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ063044005 (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694 |
title_full |
Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying |
author_sort |
Aldemir Chaim |
journal |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
journalStr |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
callnumber-first-code |
S |
lang_code |
eng spa por |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2002 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
493 |
author_browse |
Aldemir Chaim Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa João Camargo Neto Luiz Carlos Hermes |
container_volume |
37 |
class |
S1-972 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Aldemir Chaim |
doi_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying |
callnumber |
S1-972 |
title_auth |
Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying |
abstract |
The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. |
abstractGer |
The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa João Camargo Neto Luiz Carlos Hermes |
author2Str |
Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa João Camargo Neto Luiz Carlos Hermes |
ppnlink |
331758326 |
callnumber-subject |
S - General Agriculture |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 |
callnumber-a |
S1-972 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T15:32:30.039Z |
_version_ |
1803572478000234496 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ063044005</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309024453.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ063044005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S1-972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aldemir Chaim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">agricultural chemicals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aerial application</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">application methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">density</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">volume</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">João Camargo Neto</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luiz Carlos Hermes</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira</subfield><subfield code="d">Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)331758326</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2053197-7</subfield><subfield code="x">16783921</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:37</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2002</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:493-496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">37</subfield><subfield code="j">2002</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">493-496</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400839 |