Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying

The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Aldemir Chaim [verfasserIn] Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa [verfasserIn] João Camargo Neto [verfasserIn] Luiz Carlos Hermes [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Spanisch ; Portugiesisch

Erschienen:	2002

Schlagwörter:	agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira - Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004, 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:37 ; year:2002 ; number:4 ; pages:493-496

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ063044005

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ063044005
003	DE-627
005	20230309024453.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2002 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ063044005
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a spa \|a por
050		0	\|a S1-972
100	0		\|a Aldemir Chaim \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying
264		1	\|c 2002
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program.
650		4	\|a agricultural chemicals
650		4	\|a aerial application
650		4	\|a application methods
650		4	\|a density
650		4	\|a volume
653		0	\|a Agriculture (General)
700	0		\|a Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a João Camargo Neto \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Luiz Carlos Hermes \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira \|d Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 \|g 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 \|w (DE-627)331758326 \|w (DE-600)2053197-7 \|x 16783921 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:37 \|g year:2002 \|g number:4 \|g pages:493-496
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 37 \|j 2002 \|e 4 \|h 493-496

Indexfelder

author_variant	a c ac m c p y p mcpyp j c n jcn l c h lch
matchkey_str	article:16783921:2002----::oprsnfirsoimtoadopttoapormopsiieeo
hierarchy_sort_str	2002
callnumber-subject-code	S
publishDate	2002
allfields	10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063044005 (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Aldemir Chaim verfasserin aut Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying 2002 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume Agriculture (General) Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa verfasserin aut João Camargo Neto verfasserin aut Luiz Carlos Hermes verfasserin aut In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2002 4 493-496
spelling	10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063044005 (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Aldemir Chaim verfasserin aut Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying 2002 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume Agriculture (General) Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa verfasserin aut João Camargo Neto verfasserin aut Luiz Carlos Hermes verfasserin aut In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2002 4 493-496
allfields_unstemmed	10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063044005 (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Aldemir Chaim verfasserin aut Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying 2002 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume Agriculture (General) Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa verfasserin aut João Camargo Neto verfasserin aut Luiz Carlos Hermes verfasserin aut In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2002 4 493-496
allfieldsGer	10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063044005 (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Aldemir Chaim verfasserin aut Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying 2002 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume Agriculture (General) Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa verfasserin aut João Camargo Neto verfasserin aut Luiz Carlos Hermes verfasserin aut In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2002 4 493-496
allfieldsSound	10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063044005 (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Aldemir Chaim verfasserin aut Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying 2002 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program. agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume Agriculture (General) Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa verfasserin aut João Camargo Neto verfasserin aut Luiz Carlos Hermes verfasserin aut In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 37 2002 4 493-496
language	English Spanish Portuguese
source	In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496
sourceStr	In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496 volume:37 year:2002 number:4 pages:493-496
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume Agriculture (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Aldemir Chaim @@aut@@ Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa @@aut@@ João Camargo Neto @@aut@@ Luiz Carlos Hermes @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2002-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	331758326
id	DOAJ063044005
language_de	englisch spanisch portugiesisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ063044005</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309024453.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2002 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ063044005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S1-972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aldemir Chaim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">agricultural chemicals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aerial application</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">application methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">density</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">volume</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">João Camargo Neto</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luiz Carlos Hermes</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira</subfield><subfield code="d">Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)331758326</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2053197-7</subfield><subfield code="x">16783921</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:37</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2002</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:493-496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">37</subfield><subfield code="j">2002</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">493-496</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	S - Agriculture
author	Aldemir Chaim
spellingShingle	Aldemir Chaim misc S1-972 misc agricultural chemicals misc aerial application misc application methods misc density misc volume misc Agriculture (General) Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying
authorStr	Aldemir Chaim
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)331758326
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	S1-972
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	16783921
topic_title	S1-972 Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying agricultural chemicals aerial application application methods density volume
topic	misc S1-972 misc agricultural chemicals misc aerial application misc application methods misc density misc volume misc Agriculture (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc S1-972 misc agricultural chemicals misc aerial application misc application methods misc density misc volume misc Agriculture (General)
topic_browse	misc S1-972 misc agricultural chemicals misc aerial application misc application methods misc density misc volume misc Agriculture (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
hierarchy_parent_id	331758326
hierarchy_top_title	Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7
title	Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ063044005 (DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694
title_full	Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying
author_sort	Aldemir Chaim
journal	Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
journalStr	Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
callnumber-first-code	S
lang_code	eng spa por
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2002
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	493
author_browse	Aldemir Chaim Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa João Camargo Neto Luiz Carlos Hermes
container_volume	37
class	S1-972
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Aldemir Chaim
doi_str_mv	10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying
callnumber	S1-972
title_auth	Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying
abstract	The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program.
abstractGer	The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program.
abstract_unstemmed	The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	4
title_short	Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying
url	https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010 https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694 http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921
remote_bool	true
author2	Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa João Camargo Neto Luiz Carlos Hermes
author2Str	Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa João Camargo Neto Luiz Carlos Hermes
ppnlink	331758326
callnumber-subject	S - General Agriculture
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010
callnumber-a	S1-972
up_date	2024-07-03T15:32:30.039Z
_version_	1803572478000234496
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ063044005</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309024453.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2002 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ063044005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ361e426395a745f48472125739344694</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S1-972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aldemir Chaim</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The main objective of this work was to compare two methods to estimate the deposition of pesticide applied by aerial spraying. Hundred and fifty pieces of water sensitive paper were distributed over an area of 50 m length by 75 m width for sampling droplets sprayed by an aircraft calibrated to apply a spray volume of 32 L/ha. The samples were analysed by visual microscopic method using NG 2 Porton graticule and by an image analyser computer program. The results reached by visual microscopic method were the following: volume median diameter, 398±62 mum; number median diameter, 159±22 mum; droplet density, 22.5±7.0 droplets/cm² and estimated deposited volume, 22.2±9.4 L/ha. The respective ones reached with the computer program were: 402±58 mum, 161±32 mum, 21.9±7.5 droplets/cm² and 21.9±9.2 L/ha. Graphs of the spatial distribution of droplet density and deposited spray volume on the area were produced by the computer program.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">agricultural chemicals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">aerial application</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">application methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">density</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">volume</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maria Conceição Peres Young Pessoa</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">João Camargo Neto</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Luiz Carlos Hermes</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira</subfield><subfield code="d">Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">37(2002), 4, Seite 493-496</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)331758326</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2053197-7</subfield><subfield code="x">16783921</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:37</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2002</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:493-496</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2002000400010</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/361e426395a745f48472125739344694</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2002000400010&tlng=en</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v37n4/9082.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">37</subfield><subfield code="j">2002</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">493-496</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400839

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Comparison of microscopic method and computational program for pesticide deposition evaluation of spraying

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?