Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism
Background. The relationship between technology use and subjective well-being is controversial, with recent research suggesting both positive and negative links. Thus, it is important to determine whether using technology actually leads to flourishing and well-being. To do so, the construct of Techn...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Octav S. Candel [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Psychology in Russia: State of Art - M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2012, 14(2021), 3, Seite 166-179 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:14 ; year:2021 ; number:3 ; pages:166-179 |
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.11621/pir.2021.0311 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ063421585 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ063421585 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230309030832.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.11621/pir.2021.0311 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ063421585 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a BF1-990 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Octav S. Candel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Background. The relationship between technology use and subjective well-being is controversial, with recent research suggesting both positive and negative links. Thus, it is important to determine whether using technology actually leads to flourishing and well-being. To do so, the construct of TechnoWellness, which includes both adaptive and maladaptive modes of using technology, could be particularly useful. Moreover, the mechanisms that account for these relationships have been insufficiently explored. Objective: With this study, we had two objectives. First, we aimed to test the relationships between TechnoWellness and the three components of subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life). Secondly, we aimed to investigate whether optimism mediates those relationships. Design: A total of 366 participants (122 men and 244 women, mean age = 22.34 years old) took part in this study. In this cross-sectional investigation, we measured TechnoWellness, optimism, positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, and some demographic variables, using an online form. To verify our aims we used structural equation modeling (SEM) with mediation. Results: Among the positive factors of TechnoWellness, only using technology for physical activity was directly associated with satisfaction with life. Among the negative factors, the stress caused by technology use was directly associated with negative affect. Optimism mediated the relationships between these two factors (using technology for physical activity and stress caused by technology use) and all the components of subjective well-being. Conclusion: Using technology to foster wellness is related to actual subjective well-being. However, the purpose, frequency, and type of its use are important elements to be considered when studying its effects. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a technology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a positive psychology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a satisfaction with life | |
| 650 | 4 | |a positive affect | |
| 650 | 4 | |a negative affect | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Psychology | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Psychology in Russia: State of Art |d M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2012 |g 14(2021), 3, Seite 166-179 |w (DE-627)1760610518 |x 23072202 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2021 |g number:3 |g pages:166-179 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0311 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2021_3/Psychology_3_2021_166-179_Candel.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2074-6857 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2307-2202 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 14 |j 2021 |e 3 |h 166-179 | ||
| author_variant |
o s c osc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:23072202:2021----::esrntcnwlnsadtrltositsbetvwlbighm |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2021 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
BF |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| allfields |
10.11621/pir.2021.0311 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063421585 (DE-599)DOAJ1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng BF1-990 Octav S. Candel verfasserin aut Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. The relationship between technology use and subjective well-being is controversial, with recent research suggesting both positive and negative links. Thus, it is important to determine whether using technology actually leads to flourishing and well-being. To do so, the construct of TechnoWellness, which includes both adaptive and maladaptive modes of using technology, could be particularly useful. Moreover, the mechanisms that account for these relationships have been insufficiently explored. Objective: With this study, we had two objectives. First, we aimed to test the relationships between TechnoWellness and the three components of subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life). Secondly, we aimed to investigate whether optimism mediates those relationships. Design: A total of 366 participants (122 men and 244 women, mean age = 22.34 years old) took part in this study. In this cross-sectional investigation, we measured TechnoWellness, optimism, positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, and some demographic variables, using an online form. To verify our aims we used structural equation modeling (SEM) with mediation. Results: Among the positive factors of TechnoWellness, only using technology for physical activity was directly associated with satisfaction with life. Among the negative factors, the stress caused by technology use was directly associated with negative affect. Optimism mediated the relationships between these two factors (using technology for physical activity and stress caused by technology use) and all the components of subjective well-being. Conclusion: Using technology to foster wellness is related to actual subjective well-being. However, the purpose, frequency, and type of its use are important elements to be considered when studying its effects. technology positive psychology satisfaction with life positive affect negative affect Psychology In Psychology in Russia: State of Art M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2012 14(2021), 3, Seite 166-179 (DE-627)1760610518 23072202 nnns volume:14 year:2021 number:3 pages:166-179 https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0311 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 kostenfrei http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2021_3/Psychology_3_2021_166-179_Candel.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2074-6857 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2307-2202 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 14 2021 3 166-179 |
| spelling |
10.11621/pir.2021.0311 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063421585 (DE-599)DOAJ1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng BF1-990 Octav S. Candel verfasserin aut Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. The relationship between technology use and subjective well-being is controversial, with recent research suggesting both positive and negative links. Thus, it is important to determine whether using technology actually leads to flourishing and well-being. To do so, the construct of TechnoWellness, which includes both adaptive and maladaptive modes of using technology, could be particularly useful. Moreover, the mechanisms that account for these relationships have been insufficiently explored. Objective: With this study, we had two objectives. First, we aimed to test the relationships between TechnoWellness and the three components of subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life). Secondly, we aimed to investigate whether optimism mediates those relationships. Design: A total of 366 participants (122 men and 244 women, mean age = 22.34 years old) took part in this study. In this cross-sectional investigation, we measured TechnoWellness, optimism, positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, and some demographic variables, using an online form. To verify our aims we used structural equation modeling (SEM) with mediation. Results: Among the positive factors of TechnoWellness, only using technology for physical activity was directly associated with satisfaction with life. Among the negative factors, the stress caused by technology use was directly associated with negative affect. Optimism mediated the relationships between these two factors (using technology for physical activity and stress caused by technology use) and all the components of subjective well-being. Conclusion: Using technology to foster wellness is related to actual subjective well-being. However, the purpose, frequency, and type of its use are important elements to be considered when studying its effects. technology positive psychology satisfaction with life positive affect negative affect Psychology In Psychology in Russia: State of Art M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2012 14(2021), 3, Seite 166-179 (DE-627)1760610518 23072202 nnns volume:14 year:2021 number:3 pages:166-179 https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0311 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 kostenfrei http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2021_3/Psychology_3_2021_166-179_Candel.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2074-6857 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2307-2202 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 14 2021 3 166-179 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.11621/pir.2021.0311 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063421585 (DE-599)DOAJ1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng BF1-990 Octav S. Candel verfasserin aut Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. The relationship between technology use and subjective well-being is controversial, with recent research suggesting both positive and negative links. Thus, it is important to determine whether using technology actually leads to flourishing and well-being. To do so, the construct of TechnoWellness, which includes both adaptive and maladaptive modes of using technology, could be particularly useful. Moreover, the mechanisms that account for these relationships have been insufficiently explored. Objective: With this study, we had two objectives. First, we aimed to test the relationships between TechnoWellness and the three components of subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life). Secondly, we aimed to investigate whether optimism mediates those relationships. Design: A total of 366 participants (122 men and 244 women, mean age = 22.34 years old) took part in this study. In this cross-sectional investigation, we measured TechnoWellness, optimism, positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, and some demographic variables, using an online form. To verify our aims we used structural equation modeling (SEM) with mediation. Results: Among the positive factors of TechnoWellness, only using technology for physical activity was directly associated with satisfaction with life. Among the negative factors, the stress caused by technology use was directly associated with negative affect. Optimism mediated the relationships between these two factors (using technology for physical activity and stress caused by technology use) and all the components of subjective well-being. Conclusion: Using technology to foster wellness is related to actual subjective well-being. However, the purpose, frequency, and type of its use are important elements to be considered when studying its effects. technology positive psychology satisfaction with life positive affect negative affect Psychology In Psychology in Russia: State of Art M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2012 14(2021), 3, Seite 166-179 (DE-627)1760610518 23072202 nnns volume:14 year:2021 number:3 pages:166-179 https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0311 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 kostenfrei http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2021_3/Psychology_3_2021_166-179_Candel.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2074-6857 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2307-2202 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 14 2021 3 166-179 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.11621/pir.2021.0311 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063421585 (DE-599)DOAJ1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng BF1-990 Octav S. Candel verfasserin aut Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. The relationship between technology use and subjective well-being is controversial, with recent research suggesting both positive and negative links. Thus, it is important to determine whether using technology actually leads to flourishing and well-being. To do so, the construct of TechnoWellness, which includes both adaptive and maladaptive modes of using technology, could be particularly useful. Moreover, the mechanisms that account for these relationships have been insufficiently explored. Objective: With this study, we had two objectives. First, we aimed to test the relationships between TechnoWellness and the three components of subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life). Secondly, we aimed to investigate whether optimism mediates those relationships. Design: A total of 366 participants (122 men and 244 women, mean age = 22.34 years old) took part in this study. In this cross-sectional investigation, we measured TechnoWellness, optimism, positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, and some demographic variables, using an online form. To verify our aims we used structural equation modeling (SEM) with mediation. Results: Among the positive factors of TechnoWellness, only using technology for physical activity was directly associated with satisfaction with life. Among the negative factors, the stress caused by technology use was directly associated with negative affect. Optimism mediated the relationships between these two factors (using technology for physical activity and stress caused by technology use) and all the components of subjective well-being. Conclusion: Using technology to foster wellness is related to actual subjective well-being. However, the purpose, frequency, and type of its use are important elements to be considered when studying its effects. technology positive psychology satisfaction with life positive affect negative affect Psychology In Psychology in Russia: State of Art M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2012 14(2021), 3, Seite 166-179 (DE-627)1760610518 23072202 nnns volume:14 year:2021 number:3 pages:166-179 https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0311 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 kostenfrei http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2021_3/Psychology_3_2021_166-179_Candel.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2074-6857 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2307-2202 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 14 2021 3 166-179 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.11621/pir.2021.0311 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063421585 (DE-599)DOAJ1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng BF1-990 Octav S. Candel verfasserin aut Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Background. The relationship between technology use and subjective well-being is controversial, with recent research suggesting both positive and negative links. Thus, it is important to determine whether using technology actually leads to flourishing and well-being. To do so, the construct of TechnoWellness, which includes both adaptive and maladaptive modes of using technology, could be particularly useful. Moreover, the mechanisms that account for these relationships have been insufficiently explored. Objective: With this study, we had two objectives. First, we aimed to test the relationships between TechnoWellness and the three components of subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life). Secondly, we aimed to investigate whether optimism mediates those relationships. Design: A total of 366 participants (122 men and 244 women, mean age = 22.34 years old) took part in this study. In this cross-sectional investigation, we measured TechnoWellness, optimism, positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, and some demographic variables, using an online form. To verify our aims we used structural equation modeling (SEM) with mediation. Results: Among the positive factors of TechnoWellness, only using technology for physical activity was directly associated with satisfaction with life. Among the negative factors, the stress caused by technology use was directly associated with negative affect. Optimism mediated the relationships between these two factors (using technology for physical activity and stress caused by technology use) and all the components of subjective well-being. Conclusion: Using technology to foster wellness is related to actual subjective well-being. However, the purpose, frequency, and type of its use are important elements to be considered when studying its effects. technology positive psychology satisfaction with life positive affect negative affect Psychology In Psychology in Russia: State of Art M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2012 14(2021), 3, Seite 166-179 (DE-627)1760610518 23072202 nnns volume:14 year:2021 number:3 pages:166-179 https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0311 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 kostenfrei http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2021_3/Psychology_3_2021_166-179_Candel.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2074-6857 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2307-2202 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 14 2021 3 166-179 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Psychology in Russia: State of Art 14(2021), 3, Seite 166-179 volume:14 year:2021 number:3 pages:166-179 |
| sourceStr |
In Psychology in Russia: State of Art 14(2021), 3, Seite 166-179 volume:14 year:2021 number:3 pages:166-179 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
technology positive psychology satisfaction with life positive affect negative affect Psychology |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Psychology in Russia: State of Art |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Octav S. Candel @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760610518 |
| id |
DOAJ063421585 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ063421585</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309030832.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.11621/pir.2021.0311</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ063421585</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BF1-990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Octav S. Candel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background. The relationship between technology use and subjective well-being is controversial, with recent research suggesting both positive and negative links. Thus, it is important to determine whether using technology actually leads to flourishing and well-being. To do so, the construct of TechnoWellness, which includes both adaptive and maladaptive modes of using technology, could be particularly useful. Moreover, the mechanisms that account for these relationships have been insufficiently explored. Objective: With this study, we had two objectives. First, we aimed to test the relationships between TechnoWellness and the three components of subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life). Secondly, we aimed to investigate whether optimism mediates those relationships. Design: A total of 366 participants (122 men and 244 women, mean age = 22.34 years old) took part in this study. In this cross-sectional investigation, we measured TechnoWellness, optimism, positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, and some demographic variables, using an online form. To verify our aims we used structural equation modeling (SEM) with mediation. Results: Among the positive factors of TechnoWellness, only using technology for physical activity was directly associated with satisfaction with life. Among the negative factors, the stress caused by technology use was directly associated with negative affect. Optimism mediated the relationships between these two factors (using technology for physical activity and stress caused by technology use) and all the components of subjective well-being. Conclusion: Using technology to foster wellness is related to actual subjective well-being. However, the purpose, frequency, and type of its use are important elements to be considered when studying its effects.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">positive psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">satisfaction with life</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">positive affect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">negative affect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Psychology in Russia: State of Art</subfield><subfield code="d">M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2021), 3, Seite 166-179</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760610518</subfield><subfield code="x">23072202</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:166-179</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0311</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2021_3/Psychology_3_2021_166-179_Candel.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2074-6857</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2307-2202</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">166-179</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
| author |
Octav S. Candel |
| spellingShingle |
Octav S. Candel misc BF1-990 misc technology misc positive psychology misc satisfaction with life misc positive affect misc negative affect misc Psychology Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism |
| authorStr |
Octav S. Candel |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760610518 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
BF1-990 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
23072202 |
| topic_title |
BF1-990 Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism technology positive psychology satisfaction with life positive affect negative affect |
| topic |
misc BF1-990 misc technology misc positive psychology misc satisfaction with life misc positive affect misc negative affect misc Psychology |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc BF1-990 misc technology misc positive psychology misc satisfaction with life misc positive affect misc negative affect misc Psychology |
| topic_browse |
misc BF1-990 misc technology misc positive psychology misc satisfaction with life misc positive affect misc negative affect misc Psychology |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Psychology in Russia: State of Art |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760610518 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Psychology in Russia: State of Art |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760610518 |
| title |
Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ063421585 (DE-599)DOAJ1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 |
| title_full |
Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism |
| author_sort |
Octav S. Candel |
| journal |
Psychology in Russia: State of Art |
| journalStr |
Psychology in Russia: State of Art |
| callnumber-first-code |
B |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2021 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
166 |
| author_browse |
Octav S. Candel |
| container_volume |
14 |
| class |
BF1-990 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Octav S. Candel |
| doi_str_mv |
10.11621/pir.2021.0311 |
| title_sort |
measuring technowellness and its relationship to subjective well-being: the mediating role of optimism |
| callnumber |
BF1-990 |
| title_auth |
Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism |
| abstract |
Background. The relationship between technology use and subjective well-being is controversial, with recent research suggesting both positive and negative links. Thus, it is important to determine whether using technology actually leads to flourishing and well-being. To do so, the construct of TechnoWellness, which includes both adaptive and maladaptive modes of using technology, could be particularly useful. Moreover, the mechanisms that account for these relationships have been insufficiently explored. Objective: With this study, we had two objectives. First, we aimed to test the relationships between TechnoWellness and the three components of subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life). Secondly, we aimed to investigate whether optimism mediates those relationships. Design: A total of 366 participants (122 men and 244 women, mean age = 22.34 years old) took part in this study. In this cross-sectional investigation, we measured TechnoWellness, optimism, positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, and some demographic variables, using an online form. To verify our aims we used structural equation modeling (SEM) with mediation. Results: Among the positive factors of TechnoWellness, only using technology for physical activity was directly associated with satisfaction with life. Among the negative factors, the stress caused by technology use was directly associated with negative affect. Optimism mediated the relationships between these two factors (using technology for physical activity and stress caused by technology use) and all the components of subjective well-being. Conclusion: Using technology to foster wellness is related to actual subjective well-being. However, the purpose, frequency, and type of its use are important elements to be considered when studying its effects. |
| abstractGer |
Background. The relationship between technology use and subjective well-being is controversial, with recent research suggesting both positive and negative links. Thus, it is important to determine whether using technology actually leads to flourishing and well-being. To do so, the construct of TechnoWellness, which includes both adaptive and maladaptive modes of using technology, could be particularly useful. Moreover, the mechanisms that account for these relationships have been insufficiently explored. Objective: With this study, we had two objectives. First, we aimed to test the relationships between TechnoWellness and the three components of subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life). Secondly, we aimed to investigate whether optimism mediates those relationships. Design: A total of 366 participants (122 men and 244 women, mean age = 22.34 years old) took part in this study. In this cross-sectional investigation, we measured TechnoWellness, optimism, positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, and some demographic variables, using an online form. To verify our aims we used structural equation modeling (SEM) with mediation. Results: Among the positive factors of TechnoWellness, only using technology for physical activity was directly associated with satisfaction with life. Among the negative factors, the stress caused by technology use was directly associated with negative affect. Optimism mediated the relationships between these two factors (using technology for physical activity and stress caused by technology use) and all the components of subjective well-being. Conclusion: Using technology to foster wellness is related to actual subjective well-being. However, the purpose, frequency, and type of its use are important elements to be considered when studying its effects. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Background. The relationship between technology use and subjective well-being is controversial, with recent research suggesting both positive and negative links. Thus, it is important to determine whether using technology actually leads to flourishing and well-being. To do so, the construct of TechnoWellness, which includes both adaptive and maladaptive modes of using technology, could be particularly useful. Moreover, the mechanisms that account for these relationships have been insufficiently explored. Objective: With this study, we had two objectives. First, we aimed to test the relationships between TechnoWellness and the three components of subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life). Secondly, we aimed to investigate whether optimism mediates those relationships. Design: A total of 366 participants (122 men and 244 women, mean age = 22.34 years old) took part in this study. In this cross-sectional investigation, we measured TechnoWellness, optimism, positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, and some demographic variables, using an online form. To verify our aims we used structural equation modeling (SEM) with mediation. Results: Among the positive factors of TechnoWellness, only using technology for physical activity was directly associated with satisfaction with life. Among the negative factors, the stress caused by technology use was directly associated with negative affect. Optimism mediated the relationships between these two factors (using technology for physical activity and stress caused by technology use) and all the components of subjective well-being. Conclusion: Using technology to foster wellness is related to actual subjective well-being. However, the purpose, frequency, and type of its use are important elements to be considered when studying its effects. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
3 |
| title_short |
Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0311 https://doaj.org/article/1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4 http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2021_3/Psychology_3_2021_166-179_Candel.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2074-6857 https://doaj.org/toc/2307-2202 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1760610518 |
| callnumber-subject |
BF - Psychology |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.11621/pir.2021.0311 |
| callnumber-a |
BF1-990 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T17:37:15.360Z |
| _version_ |
1803580326930284544 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ063421585</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309030832.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.11621/pir.2021.0311</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ063421585</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BF1-990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Octav S. Candel</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Measuring TechnoWellness and Its Relationship to Subjective Well-Being: the Mediating Role of Optimism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Background. The relationship between technology use and subjective well-being is controversial, with recent research suggesting both positive and negative links. Thus, it is important to determine whether using technology actually leads to flourishing and well-being. To do so, the construct of TechnoWellness, which includes both adaptive and maladaptive modes of using technology, could be particularly useful. Moreover, the mechanisms that account for these relationships have been insufficiently explored. Objective: With this study, we had two objectives. First, we aimed to test the relationships between TechnoWellness and the three components of subjective well-being (positive affect, negative affect, and satisfaction with life). Secondly, we aimed to investigate whether optimism mediates those relationships. Design: A total of 366 participants (122 men and 244 women, mean age = 22.34 years old) took part in this study. In this cross-sectional investigation, we measured TechnoWellness, optimism, positive and negative affect, satisfaction with life, and some demographic variables, using an online form. To verify our aims we used structural equation modeling (SEM) with mediation. Results: Among the positive factors of TechnoWellness, only using technology for physical activity was directly associated with satisfaction with life. Among the negative factors, the stress caused by technology use was directly associated with negative affect. Optimism mediated the relationships between these two factors (using technology for physical activity and stress caused by technology use) and all the components of subjective well-being. Conclusion: Using technology to foster wellness is related to actual subjective well-being. However, the purpose, frequency, and type of its use are important elements to be considered when studying its effects.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">positive psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">satisfaction with life</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">positive affect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">negative affect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Psychology in Russia: State of Art</subfield><subfield code="d">M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">14(2021), 3, Seite 166-179</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760610518</subfield><subfield code="x">23072202</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:14</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:166-179</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2021.0311</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/1ee7ba67e32f41d0a5030fa759d7d4b4</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://psychologyinrussia.com/volumes/pdf/2021_3/Psychology_3_2021_166-179_Candel.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2074-6857</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2307-2202</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">14</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">166-179</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3993597 |