The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the patients...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Bing Kang [verfasserIn] Xiao-Yu Liu [verfasserIn] Zi-Wei Li [verfasserIn] Chao Yuan [verfasserIn] Bin Zhang [verfasserIn] Zheng-Qiang Wei [verfasserIn] Dong Peng [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2022

Schlagwörter:	colorectal cancer intraoperative blood loss surgery prognosis intraoperative blood transfusion outcomes

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Frontiers in Surgery - Frontiers Media S.A., 2014, 9(2022)
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:9 ; year:2022

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ063530708

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ063530708
003	DE-627
005	20230502081958.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ063530708
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJd42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RD1-811
100	0		\|a Bing Kang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	4	\|a The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
264		1	\|c 2022
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the patients' information from the database of a teaching hospital from January 2011 to January 2020. IBL and IBT were collected and analyzed, and the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 4,250 patients with CRC were included in this study. There were 1,911 patients in the larger IBL group and 2,339 patients in the smaller IBL group. As for IBT, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 4,168 patients in the non-IBT group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 82 patients in the non-IBT group. The larger IBL group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.000 < 0.01), smaller retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.000 < 0.01), and higher overall complication (p = 0.000 < 0.01) than the smaller IBL group. The IBT group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016 < 0.05), and higher overall complications (p = 0.013 < 0.05) compared with the non-IBT group in terms of short-term outcomes. Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.352, 95% CI = 1.142–1.601) and IBT (p = 0.044, HR = 1.487, 95% CI = 1.011–2.188) were independent predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.150–1.558) was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS); however, IBT (p = 0.179, HR = 1.300, 95% CI = 0.886–1.908) was not an independent predictor of DFS.ConclusionBased on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of IBL and IBT, surgeons should be cautious during the operation and more careful and proficient surgical skills are required for surgeons.
650		4	\|a colorectal cancer
650		4	\|a intraoperative blood loss
650		4	\|a surgery
650		4	\|a prognosis
650		4	\|a intraoperative blood transfusion
650		4	\|a outcomes
653		0	\|a Surgery
700	0		\|a Xiao-Yu Liu \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Zi-Wei Li \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Chao Yuan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Bin Zhang \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Zheng-Qiang Wei \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Dong Peng \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Frontiers in Surgery \|d Frontiers Media S.A., 2014 \|g 9(2022) \|w (DE-627)788288954 \|w (DE-600)2773823-1 \|x 2296875X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:9 \|g year:2022
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/d42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545/full \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2296-875X \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2446
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 9 \|j 2022

Indexfelder

author_variant	b k bk x y l xyl z w l zwl c y cy b z bz z q w zqw d p dp
matchkey_str	article:2296875X:2022----::hefcotenroeaielolsadnroeaielotasuinnhsotemucmsnponssfooet
hierarchy_sort_str	2022
callnumber-subject-code	RD
publishDate	2022
allfields	10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063530708 (DE-599)DOAJd42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Bing Kang verfasserin aut The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the patients' information from the database of a teaching hospital from January 2011 to January 2020. IBL and IBT were collected and analyzed, and the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 4,250 patients with CRC were included in this study. There were 1,911 patients in the larger IBL group and 2,339 patients in the smaller IBL group. As for IBT, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 4,168 patients in the non-IBT group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 82 patients in the non-IBT group. The larger IBL group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.000 < 0.01), smaller retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.000 < 0.01), and higher overall complication (p = 0.000 < 0.01) than the smaller IBL group. The IBT group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016 < 0.05), and higher overall complications (p = 0.013 < 0.05) compared with the non-IBT group in terms of short-term outcomes. Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.352, 95% CI = 1.142–1.601) and IBT (p = 0.044, HR = 1.487, 95% CI = 1.011–2.188) were independent predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.150–1.558) was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS); however, IBT (p = 0.179, HR = 1.300, 95% CI = 0.886–1.908) was not an independent predictor of DFS.ConclusionBased on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of IBL and IBT, surgeons should be cautious during the operation and more careful and proficient surgical skills are required for surgeons. colorectal cancer intraoperative blood loss surgery prognosis intraoperative blood transfusion outcomes Surgery Xiao-Yu Liu verfasserin aut Zi-Wei Li verfasserin aut Chao Yuan verfasserin aut Bin Zhang verfasserin aut Zheng-Qiang Wei verfasserin aut Dong Peng verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Surgery Frontiers Media S.A., 2014 9(2022) (DE-627)788288954 (DE-600)2773823-1 2296875X nnns volume:9 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2296-875X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2022
spelling	10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063530708 (DE-599)DOAJd42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Bing Kang verfasserin aut The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the patients' information from the database of a teaching hospital from January 2011 to January 2020. IBL and IBT were collected and analyzed, and the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 4,250 patients with CRC were included in this study. There were 1,911 patients in the larger IBL group and 2,339 patients in the smaller IBL group. As for IBT, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 4,168 patients in the non-IBT group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 82 patients in the non-IBT group. The larger IBL group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.000 < 0.01), smaller retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.000 < 0.01), and higher overall complication (p = 0.000 < 0.01) than the smaller IBL group. The IBT group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016 < 0.05), and higher overall complications (p = 0.013 < 0.05) compared with the non-IBT group in terms of short-term outcomes. Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.352, 95% CI = 1.142–1.601) and IBT (p = 0.044, HR = 1.487, 95% CI = 1.011–2.188) were independent predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.150–1.558) was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS); however, IBT (p = 0.179, HR = 1.300, 95% CI = 0.886–1.908) was not an independent predictor of DFS.ConclusionBased on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of IBL and IBT, surgeons should be cautious during the operation and more careful and proficient surgical skills are required for surgeons. colorectal cancer intraoperative blood loss surgery prognosis intraoperative blood transfusion outcomes Surgery Xiao-Yu Liu verfasserin aut Zi-Wei Li verfasserin aut Chao Yuan verfasserin aut Bin Zhang verfasserin aut Zheng-Qiang Wei verfasserin aut Dong Peng verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Surgery Frontiers Media S.A., 2014 9(2022) (DE-627)788288954 (DE-600)2773823-1 2296875X nnns volume:9 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2296-875X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2022
allfields_unstemmed	10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063530708 (DE-599)DOAJd42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Bing Kang verfasserin aut The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the patients' information from the database of a teaching hospital from January 2011 to January 2020. IBL and IBT were collected and analyzed, and the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 4,250 patients with CRC were included in this study. There were 1,911 patients in the larger IBL group and 2,339 patients in the smaller IBL group. As for IBT, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 4,168 patients in the non-IBT group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 82 patients in the non-IBT group. The larger IBL group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.000 < 0.01), smaller retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.000 < 0.01), and higher overall complication (p = 0.000 < 0.01) than the smaller IBL group. The IBT group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016 < 0.05), and higher overall complications (p = 0.013 < 0.05) compared with the non-IBT group in terms of short-term outcomes. Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.352, 95% CI = 1.142–1.601) and IBT (p = 0.044, HR = 1.487, 95% CI = 1.011–2.188) were independent predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.150–1.558) was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS); however, IBT (p = 0.179, HR = 1.300, 95% CI = 0.886–1.908) was not an independent predictor of DFS.ConclusionBased on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of IBL and IBT, surgeons should be cautious during the operation and more careful and proficient surgical skills are required for surgeons. colorectal cancer intraoperative blood loss surgery prognosis intraoperative blood transfusion outcomes Surgery Xiao-Yu Liu verfasserin aut Zi-Wei Li verfasserin aut Chao Yuan verfasserin aut Bin Zhang verfasserin aut Zheng-Qiang Wei verfasserin aut Dong Peng verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Surgery Frontiers Media S.A., 2014 9(2022) (DE-627)788288954 (DE-600)2773823-1 2296875X nnns volume:9 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2296-875X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2022
allfieldsGer	10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063530708 (DE-599)DOAJd42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Bing Kang verfasserin aut The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the patients' information from the database of a teaching hospital from January 2011 to January 2020. IBL and IBT were collected and analyzed, and the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 4,250 patients with CRC were included in this study. There were 1,911 patients in the larger IBL group and 2,339 patients in the smaller IBL group. As for IBT, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 4,168 patients in the non-IBT group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 82 patients in the non-IBT group. The larger IBL group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.000 < 0.01), smaller retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.000 < 0.01), and higher overall complication (p = 0.000 < 0.01) than the smaller IBL group. The IBT group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016 < 0.05), and higher overall complications (p = 0.013 < 0.05) compared with the non-IBT group in terms of short-term outcomes. Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.352, 95% CI = 1.142–1.601) and IBT (p = 0.044, HR = 1.487, 95% CI = 1.011–2.188) were independent predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.150–1.558) was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS); however, IBT (p = 0.179, HR = 1.300, 95% CI = 0.886–1.908) was not an independent predictor of DFS.ConclusionBased on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of IBL and IBT, surgeons should be cautious during the operation and more careful and proficient surgical skills are required for surgeons. colorectal cancer intraoperative blood loss surgery prognosis intraoperative blood transfusion outcomes Surgery Xiao-Yu Liu verfasserin aut Zi-Wei Li verfasserin aut Chao Yuan verfasserin aut Bin Zhang verfasserin aut Zheng-Qiang Wei verfasserin aut Dong Peng verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Surgery Frontiers Media S.A., 2014 9(2022) (DE-627)788288954 (DE-600)2773823-1 2296875X nnns volume:9 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2296-875X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2022
allfieldsSound	10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063530708 (DE-599)DOAJd42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RD1-811 Bing Kang verfasserin aut The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the patients' information from the database of a teaching hospital from January 2011 to January 2020. IBL and IBT were collected and analyzed, and the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 4,250 patients with CRC were included in this study. There were 1,911 patients in the larger IBL group and 2,339 patients in the smaller IBL group. As for IBT, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 4,168 patients in the non-IBT group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 82 patients in the non-IBT group. The larger IBL group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.000 < 0.01), smaller retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.000 < 0.01), and higher overall complication (p = 0.000 < 0.01) than the smaller IBL group. The IBT group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016 < 0.05), and higher overall complications (p = 0.013 < 0.05) compared with the non-IBT group in terms of short-term outcomes. Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.352, 95% CI = 1.142–1.601) and IBT (p = 0.044, HR = 1.487, 95% CI = 1.011–2.188) were independent predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.150–1.558) was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS); however, IBT (p = 0.179, HR = 1.300, 95% CI = 0.886–1.908) was not an independent predictor of DFS.ConclusionBased on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of IBL and IBT, surgeons should be cautious during the operation and more careful and proficient surgical skills are required for surgeons. colorectal cancer intraoperative blood loss surgery prognosis intraoperative blood transfusion outcomes Surgery Xiao-Yu Liu verfasserin aut Zi-Wei Li verfasserin aut Chao Yuan verfasserin aut Bin Zhang verfasserin aut Zheng-Qiang Wei verfasserin aut Dong Peng verfasserin aut In Frontiers in Surgery Frontiers Media S.A., 2014 9(2022) (DE-627)788288954 (DE-600)2773823-1 2296875X nnns volume:9 year:2022 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604 kostenfrei https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545/full kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2296-875X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 9 2022
language	English
source	In Frontiers in Surgery 9(2022) volume:9 year:2022
sourceStr	In Frontiers in Surgery 9(2022) volume:9 year:2022
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	colorectal cancer intraoperative blood loss surgery prognosis intraoperative blood transfusion outcomes Surgery
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Frontiers in Surgery
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Bing Kang @@aut@@ Xiao-Yu Liu @@aut@@ Zi-Wei Li @@aut@@ Chao Yuan @@aut@@ Bin Zhang @@aut@@ Zheng-Qiang Wei @@aut@@ Dong Peng @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2022-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	788288954
id	DOAJ063530708
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ063530708</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502081958.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ063530708</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RD1-811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bing Kang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the patients' information from the database of a teaching hospital from January 2011 to January 2020. IBL and IBT were collected and analyzed, and the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 4,250 patients with CRC were included in this study. There were 1,911 patients in the larger IBL group and 2,339 patients in the smaller IBL group. As for IBT, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 4,168 patients in the non-IBT group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 82 patients in the non-IBT group. The larger IBL group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 &lt; 0.01), longer post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.000 &lt; 0.01), smaller retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.000 &lt; 0.01), and higher overall complication (p = 0.000 &lt; 0.01) than the smaller IBL group. The IBT group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 &lt; 0.01), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016 &lt; 0.05), and higher overall complications (p = 0.013 &lt; 0.05) compared with the non-IBT group in terms of short-term outcomes. Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.352, 95% CI = 1.142–1.601) and IBT (p = 0.044, HR = 1.487, 95% CI = 1.011–2.188) were independent predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.150–1.558) was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS); however, IBT (p = 0.179, HR = 1.300, 95% CI = 0.886–1.908) was not an independent predictor of DFS.ConclusionBased on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of IBL and IBT, surgeons should be cautious during the operation and more careful and proficient surgical skills are required for surgeons.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">colorectal cancer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">intraoperative blood loss</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prognosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">intraoperative blood transfusion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiao-Yu Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zi-Wei Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chao Yuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bin Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zheng-Qiang Wei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong Peng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">9(2022)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)788288954</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2773823-1</subfield><subfield code="x">2296875X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:9</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2296-875X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">9</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Bing Kang
spellingShingle	Bing Kang misc RD1-811 misc colorectal cancer misc intraoperative blood loss misc surgery misc prognosis misc intraoperative blood transfusion misc outcomes misc Surgery The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
authorStr	Bing Kang
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)788288954
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RD1-811
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2296875X
topic_title	RD1-811 The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis colorectal cancer intraoperative blood loss surgery prognosis intraoperative blood transfusion outcomes
topic	misc RD1-811 misc colorectal cancer misc intraoperative blood loss misc surgery misc prognosis misc intraoperative blood transfusion misc outcomes misc Surgery
topic_unstemmed	misc RD1-811 misc colorectal cancer misc intraoperative blood loss misc surgery misc prognosis misc intraoperative blood transfusion misc outcomes misc Surgery
topic_browse	misc RD1-811 misc colorectal cancer misc intraoperative blood loss misc surgery misc prognosis misc intraoperative blood transfusion misc outcomes misc Surgery
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Frontiers in Surgery
hierarchy_parent_id	788288954
hierarchy_top_title	Frontiers in Surgery
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)788288954 (DE-600)2773823-1
title	The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ063530708 (DE-599)DOAJd42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604
title_full	The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
author_sort	Bing Kang
journal	Frontiers in Surgery
journalStr	Frontiers in Surgery
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2022
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Bing Kang Xiao-Yu Liu Zi-Wei Li Chao Yuan Bin Zhang Zheng-Qiang Wei Dong Peng
container_volume	9
class	RD1-811
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Bing Kang
doi_str_mv	10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	effect of the intraoperative blood loss and intraoperative blood transfusion on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
callnumber	RD1-811
title_auth	The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
abstract	PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the patients' information from the database of a teaching hospital from January 2011 to January 2020. IBL and IBT were collected and analyzed, and the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 4,250 patients with CRC were included in this study. There were 1,911 patients in the larger IBL group and 2,339 patients in the smaller IBL group. As for IBT, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 4,168 patients in the non-IBT group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 82 patients in the non-IBT group. The larger IBL group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.000 < 0.01), smaller retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.000 < 0.01), and higher overall complication (p = 0.000 < 0.01) than the smaller IBL group. The IBT group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016 < 0.05), and higher overall complications (p = 0.013 < 0.05) compared with the non-IBT group in terms of short-term outcomes. Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.352, 95% CI = 1.142–1.601) and IBT (p = 0.044, HR = 1.487, 95% CI = 1.011–2.188) were independent predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.150–1.558) was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS); however, IBT (p = 0.179, HR = 1.300, 95% CI = 0.886–1.908) was not an independent predictor of DFS.ConclusionBased on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of IBL and IBT, surgeons should be cautious during the operation and more careful and proficient surgical skills are required for surgeons.
abstractGer	PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the patients' information from the database of a teaching hospital from January 2011 to January 2020. IBL and IBT were collected and analyzed, and the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 4,250 patients with CRC were included in this study. There were 1,911 patients in the larger IBL group and 2,339 patients in the smaller IBL group. As for IBT, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 4,168 patients in the non-IBT group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 82 patients in the non-IBT group. The larger IBL group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.000 < 0.01), smaller retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.000 < 0.01), and higher overall complication (p = 0.000 < 0.01) than the smaller IBL group. The IBT group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016 < 0.05), and higher overall complications (p = 0.013 < 0.05) compared with the non-IBT group in terms of short-term outcomes. Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.352, 95% CI = 1.142–1.601) and IBT (p = 0.044, HR = 1.487, 95% CI = 1.011–2.188) were independent predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.150–1.558) was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS); however, IBT (p = 0.179, HR = 1.300, 95% CI = 0.886–1.908) was not an independent predictor of DFS.ConclusionBased on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of IBL and IBT, surgeons should be cautious during the operation and more careful and proficient surgical skills are required for surgeons.
abstract_unstemmed	PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the patients' information from the database of a teaching hospital from January 2011 to January 2020. IBL and IBT were collected and analyzed, and the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 4,250 patients with CRC were included in this study. There were 1,911 patients in the larger IBL group and 2,339 patients in the smaller IBL group. As for IBT, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 4,168 patients in the non-IBT group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 82 patients in the non-IBT group. The larger IBL group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.000 < 0.01), smaller retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.000 < 0.01), and higher overall complication (p = 0.000 < 0.01) than the smaller IBL group. The IBT group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 < 0.01), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016 < 0.05), and higher overall complications (p = 0.013 < 0.05) compared with the non-IBT group in terms of short-term outcomes. Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.352, 95% CI = 1.142–1.601) and IBT (p = 0.044, HR = 1.487, 95% CI = 1.011–2.188) were independent predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.150–1.558) was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS); however, IBT (p = 0.179, HR = 1.300, 95% CI = 0.886–1.908) was not an independent predictor of DFS.ConclusionBased on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of IBL and IBT, surgeons should be cautious during the operation and more careful and proficient surgical skills are required for surgeons.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
title_short	The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
url	https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545 https://doaj.org/article/d42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545/full https://doaj.org/toc/2296-875X
remote_bool	true
author2	Xiao-Yu Liu Zi-Wei Li Chao Yuan Bin Zhang Zheng-Qiang Wei Dong Peng
author2Str	Xiao-Yu Liu Zi-Wei Li Chao Yuan Bin Zhang Zheng-Qiang Wei Dong Peng
ppnlink	788288954
callnumber-subject	RD - Surgery
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545
callnumber-a	RD1-811
up_date	2024-07-03T18:12:47.603Z
_version_	1803582562740731905
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ063530708</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502081958.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2022 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ063530708</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RD1-811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bing Kang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PurposeThe purpose of the current study was to analyze the effect of intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and intraoperative blood transfusion (IBT) on the short-term outcomes and prognosis for patients who underwent primary colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the patients' information from the database of a teaching hospital from January 2011 to January 2020. IBL and IBT were collected and analyzed, and the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.ResultsA total of 4,250 patients with CRC were included in this study. There were 1,911 patients in the larger IBL group and 2,339 patients in the smaller IBL group. As for IBT, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 4,168 patients in the non-IBT group. After 1:1 ratio PSM, there were 82 patients in the IBT group and 82 patients in the non-IBT group. The larger IBL group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 &lt; 0.01), longer post-operative hospital stay (p = 0.000 &lt; 0.01), smaller retrieved lymph nodes (p = 0.000 &lt; 0.01), and higher overall complication (p = 0.000 &lt; 0.01) than the smaller IBL group. The IBT group had longer operation time (p = 0.000 &lt; 0.01), longer hospital stay (p = 0.016 &lt; 0.05), and higher overall complications (p = 0.013 &lt; 0.05) compared with the non-IBT group in terms of short-term outcomes. Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.352, 95% CI = 1.142–1.601) and IBT (p = 0.044, HR = 1.487, 95% CI = 1.011–2.188) were independent predictive factors of overall survival (OS). Larger IBL (p = 0.000, HR = 1.338, 95% CI = 1.150–1.558) was an independent predictor of disease-free survival (DFS); however, IBT (p = 0.179, HR = 1.300, 95% CI = 0.886–1.908) was not an independent predictor of DFS.ConclusionBased on the short-term outcomes and prognosis of IBL and IBT, surgeons should be cautious during the operation and more careful and proficient surgical skills are required for surgeons.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">colorectal cancer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">intraoperative blood loss</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prognosis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">intraoperative blood transfusion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Surgery</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Xiao-Yu Liu</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zi-Wei Li</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chao Yuan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bin Zhang</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zheng-Qiang Wei</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dong Peng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Frontiers in Surgery</subfield><subfield code="d">Frontiers Media S.A., 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">9(2022)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)788288954</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2773823-1</subfield><subfield code="x">2296875X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:9</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d42def9d46dc44ff9a4556a8e3178604</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2022.837545/full</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2296-875X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">9</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4021854

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

The Effect of the Intraoperative Blood Loss and Intraoperative Blood Transfusion on the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?