Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker
Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher tha...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Alimasunya E [verfasserIn] Olotu Yahaya [verfasserIn] Abudu Mohammed [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie - Eftimie Murgu University of Resita, 2010, (2015), 2, Seite 19-32 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2015 ; number:2 ; pages:19-32 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ063655047 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ063655047 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230309032110.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230228s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ063655047 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a TA1-2040 | |
100 | 0 | |a Alimasunya E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher than (A) with 0.06. It has 99% and 20.1% system and efficiency reliabilities. Client (B) has the flexibility of indoor and outdoor which Client (A) lacks. The overall simulation analysis shows that client (B) product is better than (A). | ||
650 | 4 | |a Loudspeaker | |
650 | 4 | |a Client | |
650 | 4 | |a Efficiency | |
650 | 4 | |a Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a System | |
650 | 4 | |a Reliability | |
650 | 4 | |a Performance | |
653 | 0 | |a Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) | |
700 | 0 | |a Olotu Yahaya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Abudu Mohammed |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie |d Eftimie Murgu University of Resita, 2010 |g (2015), 2, Seite 19-32 |w (DE-627)1760621218 |x 14537397 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:19-32 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://anale-ing.uem.ro/2015/202.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |j 2015 |e 2 |h 19-32 |
author_variant |
a e ae o y oy a m am |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:14537397:2015----::einoautiaiiyfcmecapoutcssuy |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
callnumber-subject-code |
TA |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ063655047 (DE-599)DOAJ4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 Alimasunya E verfasserin aut Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher than (A) with 0.06. It has 99% and 20.1% system and efficiency reliabilities. Client (B) has the flexibility of indoor and outdoor which Client (A) lacks. The overall simulation analysis shows that client (B) product is better than (A). Loudspeaker Client Efficiency Analysis System Reliability Performance Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Olotu Yahaya verfasserin aut Abudu Mohammed verfasserin aut In Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie Eftimie Murgu University of Resita, 2010 (2015), 2, Seite 19-32 (DE-627)1760621218 14537397 nnns year:2015 number:2 pages:19-32 https://doaj.org/article/4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e kostenfrei http://anale-ing.uem.ro/2015/202.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 AR 2015 2 19-32 |
spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ063655047 (DE-599)DOAJ4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 Alimasunya E verfasserin aut Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher than (A) with 0.06. It has 99% and 20.1% system and efficiency reliabilities. Client (B) has the flexibility of indoor and outdoor which Client (A) lacks. The overall simulation analysis shows that client (B) product is better than (A). Loudspeaker Client Efficiency Analysis System Reliability Performance Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Olotu Yahaya verfasserin aut Abudu Mohammed verfasserin aut In Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie Eftimie Murgu University of Resita, 2010 (2015), 2, Seite 19-32 (DE-627)1760621218 14537397 nnns year:2015 number:2 pages:19-32 https://doaj.org/article/4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e kostenfrei http://anale-ing.uem.ro/2015/202.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 AR 2015 2 19-32 |
allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ063655047 (DE-599)DOAJ4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 Alimasunya E verfasserin aut Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher than (A) with 0.06. It has 99% and 20.1% system and efficiency reliabilities. Client (B) has the flexibility of indoor and outdoor which Client (A) lacks. The overall simulation analysis shows that client (B) product is better than (A). Loudspeaker Client Efficiency Analysis System Reliability Performance Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Olotu Yahaya verfasserin aut Abudu Mohammed verfasserin aut In Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie Eftimie Murgu University of Resita, 2010 (2015), 2, Seite 19-32 (DE-627)1760621218 14537397 nnns year:2015 number:2 pages:19-32 https://doaj.org/article/4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e kostenfrei http://anale-ing.uem.ro/2015/202.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 AR 2015 2 19-32 |
allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ063655047 (DE-599)DOAJ4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 Alimasunya E verfasserin aut Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher than (A) with 0.06. It has 99% and 20.1% system and efficiency reliabilities. Client (B) has the flexibility of indoor and outdoor which Client (A) lacks. The overall simulation analysis shows that client (B) product is better than (A). Loudspeaker Client Efficiency Analysis System Reliability Performance Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Olotu Yahaya verfasserin aut Abudu Mohammed verfasserin aut In Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie Eftimie Murgu University of Resita, 2010 (2015), 2, Seite 19-32 (DE-627)1760621218 14537397 nnns year:2015 number:2 pages:19-32 https://doaj.org/article/4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e kostenfrei http://anale-ing.uem.ro/2015/202.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 AR 2015 2 19-32 |
allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ063655047 (DE-599)DOAJ4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 Alimasunya E verfasserin aut Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher than (A) with 0.06. It has 99% and 20.1% system and efficiency reliabilities. Client (B) has the flexibility of indoor and outdoor which Client (A) lacks. The overall simulation analysis shows that client (B) product is better than (A). Loudspeaker Client Efficiency Analysis System Reliability Performance Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Olotu Yahaya verfasserin aut Abudu Mohammed verfasserin aut In Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie Eftimie Murgu University of Resita, 2010 (2015), 2, Seite 19-32 (DE-627)1760621218 14537397 nnns year:2015 number:2 pages:19-32 https://doaj.org/article/4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e kostenfrei http://anale-ing.uem.ro/2015/202.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 AR 2015 2 19-32 |
language |
English |
source |
In Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie (2015), 2, Seite 19-32 year:2015 number:2 pages:19-32 |
sourceStr |
In Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie (2015), 2, Seite 19-32 year:2015 number:2 pages:19-32 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Loudspeaker Client Efficiency Analysis System Reliability Performance Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Alimasunya E @@aut@@ Olotu Yahaya @@aut@@ Abudu Mohammed @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1760621218 |
id |
DOAJ063655047 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ063655047</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309032110.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ063655047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TA1-2040</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alimasunya E</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher than (A) with 0.06. It has 99% and 20.1% system and efficiency reliabilities. Client (B) has the flexibility of indoor and outdoor which Client (A) lacks. The overall simulation analysis shows that client (B) product is better than (A).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Loudspeaker</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Client</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Efficiency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">System</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reliability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Olotu Yahaya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abudu Mohammed</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie</subfield><subfield code="d">Eftimie Murgu University of Resita, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">(2015), 2, Seite 19-32</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760621218</subfield><subfield code="x">14537397</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:19-32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://anale-ing.uem.ro/2015/202.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">19-32</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
author |
Alimasunya E |
spellingShingle |
Alimasunya E misc TA1-2040 misc Loudspeaker misc Client misc Efficiency misc Analysis misc System misc Reliability misc Performance misc Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker |
authorStr |
Alimasunya E |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760621218 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
TA1-2040 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
14537397 |
topic_title |
TA1-2040 Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker Loudspeaker Client Efficiency Analysis System Reliability Performance |
topic |
misc TA1-2040 misc Loudspeaker misc Client misc Efficiency misc Analysis misc System misc Reliability misc Performance misc Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
topic_unstemmed |
misc TA1-2040 misc Loudspeaker misc Client misc Efficiency misc Analysis misc System misc Reliability misc Performance misc Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
topic_browse |
misc TA1-2040 misc Loudspeaker misc Client misc Efficiency misc Analysis misc System misc Reliability misc Performance misc Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1760621218 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760621218 |
title |
Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ063655047 (DE-599)DOAJ4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e |
title_full |
Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker |
author_sort |
Alimasunya E |
journal |
Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie |
journalStr |
Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie |
callnumber-first-code |
T |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
19 |
author_browse |
Alimasunya E Olotu Yahaya Abudu Mohammed |
class |
TA1-2040 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Alimasunya E |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
design for a sustainability of a commercial product: a case study of a dynamic loudspeaker |
callnumber |
TA1-2040 |
title_auth |
Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker |
abstract |
Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher than (A) with 0.06. It has 99% and 20.1% system and efficiency reliabilities. Client (B) has the flexibility of indoor and outdoor which Client (A) lacks. The overall simulation analysis shows that client (B) product is better than (A). |
abstractGer |
Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher than (A) with 0.06. It has 99% and 20.1% system and efficiency reliabilities. Client (B) has the flexibility of indoor and outdoor which Client (A) lacks. The overall simulation analysis shows that client (B) product is better than (A). |
abstract_unstemmed |
Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher than (A) with 0.06. It has 99% and 20.1% system and efficiency reliabilities. Client (B) has the flexibility of indoor and outdoor which Client (A) lacks. The overall simulation analysis shows that client (B) product is better than (A). |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4305 |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e http://anale-ing.uem.ro/2015/202.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Olotu Yahaya Abudu Mohammed |
author2Str |
Olotu Yahaya Abudu Mohammed |
ppnlink |
1760621218 |
callnumber-subject |
TA - General and Civil Engineering |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
callnumber-a |
TA1-2040 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T18:51:27.619Z |
_version_ |
1803584995460120576 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ063655047</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309032110.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ063655047</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TA1-2040</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Alimasunya E</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design for a Sustainability of a Commercial Product: A Case Study of a Dynamic Loudspeaker</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sensitivity-based analysis carried out on the production of dynamic loudspeakers for client (A) and (B) showed that client (A) has reliability efficiency 0f 20.4% with 90% of Tp, 30%-Ep, 50%-Ecp, while client (B) has 30%-Tp, 90%-Ep and 50%-Ecp respectively. Sustainability of client (B) is higher than (A) with 0.06. It has 99% and 20.1% system and efficiency reliabilities. Client (B) has the flexibility of indoor and outdoor which Client (A) lacks. The overall simulation analysis shows that client (B) product is better than (A).</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Loudspeaker</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Client</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Efficiency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">System</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reliability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Performance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Olotu Yahaya</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abudu Mohammed</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Analele Universităţii "Eftimie Murgu" Reşiţa: Fascicola I, Inginerie</subfield><subfield code="d">Eftimie Murgu University of Resita, 2010</subfield><subfield code="g">(2015), 2, Seite 19-32</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760621218</subfield><subfield code="x">14537397</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:19-32</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4535d0337305422e8091ae8723cf641e</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://anale-ing.uem.ro/2015/202.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1453-7397</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">19-32</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400568 |