PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY

In the article, the authors analyzed the results of a survey of individuals who referred to a plastic surgeon for cosmetic rhinoplasty, as well as the authors evaluated the satisfaction of the operation. All patients, depending on the presence or absence of cosmetic defects of the nose, were divided...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Bodnar L. A. [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Russisch ; Ukrainisch

Erschienen:	2020

Schlagwörter:	rhinoplasty satisfaction screening questionnaire.

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Вісник проблем біології і медицини - Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, 2018, (2020), 3, Seite 304-307
Übergeordnetes Werk:	year:2020 ; number:3 ; pages:304-307

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ063769565

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ063769565
003	DE-627
005	20230309032729.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ063769565
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a rus \|a ukr
050		0	\|a QH301-705.5
100	0		\|a Bodnar L. A. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY
264		1	\|c 2020
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a In the article, the authors analyzed the results of a survey of individuals who referred to a plastic surgeon for cosmetic rhinoplasty, as well as the authors evaluated the satisfaction of the operation. All patients, depending on the presence or absence of cosmetic defects of the nose, were divided into two groups: the first (I) – 69 individuals (men – 30, women – 39, aged 19 to 50 years), with visible defects and deformations of the external nose, which deviated from the established aesthetic norms accepted in cosmetology, but did not distort the appearance of the face and did not violate the physiological functions of the nose; the second group (II) – 30 individuals (men – 14, women – 16, aged 19 to 30 years) who do not have cosmetic defects of the nose, however these individuals fixed unreasonably great attention on their nose, were categorically dissatisfied with it, as well as persistently demanded to change its shape. In accordance with the results of the study, the authors showed that the vast majority of the examined individuals, who referred to a plastic surgeon for rhinoplasty, have mental disorders of the nonpsychotic register, which differed depending on the presence or absence of defects and deformities of the nose. Based on the results of the study, the authors determined the predictors of the negative psychological consequences of rhinoplasty and dissatisfaction with its results (dysmorphophobia, limitation of social functioning, repeated rhinoplasty with an unrealistic expectation of results, high levels of depression and anxiety) and suggested a screening questionnaire for the timely identification of patients who would not be satisfied with a successful surgical intervention.
650		4	\|a rhinoplasty
650		4	\|a satisfaction
650		4	\|a screening questionnaire.
653		0	\|a Medicine
653		0	\|a R
653		0	\|a Biology (General)
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Вісник проблем біології і медицини \|d Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, 2018 \|g (2020), 3, Seite 304-307 \|w (DE-627)176059525X \|x 25234110 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g year:2020 \|g number:3 \|g pages:304-307
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://vpbm.com.ua/upload/2020-3(157)/70-min.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2077-4214 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4110 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|j 2020 \|e 3 \|h 304-307

Indexfelder

author_variant	b l a bla
matchkey_str	article:25234110:2020----::scooiapeitrodsaifcinihhr
hierarchy_sort_str	2020
callnumber-subject-code	QH
publishDate	2020
allfields	10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063769565 (DE-599)DOAJ57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr QH301-705.5 Bodnar L. A. verfasserin aut PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the article, the authors analyzed the results of a survey of individuals who referred to a plastic surgeon for cosmetic rhinoplasty, as well as the authors evaluated the satisfaction of the operation. All patients, depending on the presence or absence of cosmetic defects of the nose, were divided into two groups: the first (I) – 69 individuals (men – 30, women – 39, aged 19 to 50 years), with visible defects and deformations of the external nose, which deviated from the established aesthetic norms accepted in cosmetology, but did not distort the appearance of the face and did not violate the physiological functions of the nose; the second group (II) – 30 individuals (men – 14, women – 16, aged 19 to 30 years) who do not have cosmetic defects of the nose, however these individuals fixed unreasonably great attention on their nose, were categorically dissatisfied with it, as well as persistently demanded to change its shape. In accordance with the results of the study, the authors showed that the vast majority of the examined individuals, who referred to a plastic surgeon for rhinoplasty, have mental disorders of the nonpsychotic register, which differed depending on the presence or absence of defects and deformities of the nose. Based on the results of the study, the authors determined the predictors of the negative psychological consequences of rhinoplasty and dissatisfaction with its results (dysmorphophobia, limitation of social functioning, repeated rhinoplasty with an unrealistic expectation of results, high levels of depression and anxiety) and suggested a screening questionnaire for the timely identification of patients who would not be satisfied with a successful surgical intervention. rhinoplasty satisfaction screening questionnaire. Medicine R Biology (General) In Вісник проблем біології і медицини Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, 2018 (2020), 3, Seite 304-307 (DE-627)176059525X 25234110 nnns year:2020 number:3 pages:304-307 https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0 kostenfrei https://vpbm.com.ua/upload/2020-3(157)/70-min.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2077-4214 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4110 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 3 304-307
spelling	10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063769565 (DE-599)DOAJ57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr QH301-705.5 Bodnar L. A. verfasserin aut PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the article, the authors analyzed the results of a survey of individuals who referred to a plastic surgeon for cosmetic rhinoplasty, as well as the authors evaluated the satisfaction of the operation. All patients, depending on the presence or absence of cosmetic defects of the nose, were divided into two groups: the first (I) – 69 individuals (men – 30, women – 39, aged 19 to 50 years), with visible defects and deformations of the external nose, which deviated from the established aesthetic norms accepted in cosmetology, but did not distort the appearance of the face and did not violate the physiological functions of the nose; the second group (II) – 30 individuals (men – 14, women – 16, aged 19 to 30 years) who do not have cosmetic defects of the nose, however these individuals fixed unreasonably great attention on their nose, were categorically dissatisfied with it, as well as persistently demanded to change its shape. In accordance with the results of the study, the authors showed that the vast majority of the examined individuals, who referred to a plastic surgeon for rhinoplasty, have mental disorders of the nonpsychotic register, which differed depending on the presence or absence of defects and deformities of the nose. Based on the results of the study, the authors determined the predictors of the negative psychological consequences of rhinoplasty and dissatisfaction with its results (dysmorphophobia, limitation of social functioning, repeated rhinoplasty with an unrealistic expectation of results, high levels of depression and anxiety) and suggested a screening questionnaire for the timely identification of patients who would not be satisfied with a successful surgical intervention. rhinoplasty satisfaction screening questionnaire. Medicine R Biology (General) In Вісник проблем біології і медицини Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, 2018 (2020), 3, Seite 304-307 (DE-627)176059525X 25234110 nnns year:2020 number:3 pages:304-307 https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0 kostenfrei https://vpbm.com.ua/upload/2020-3(157)/70-min.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2077-4214 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4110 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 3 304-307
allfields_unstemmed	10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063769565 (DE-599)DOAJ57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr QH301-705.5 Bodnar L. A. verfasserin aut PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the article, the authors analyzed the results of a survey of individuals who referred to a plastic surgeon for cosmetic rhinoplasty, as well as the authors evaluated the satisfaction of the operation. All patients, depending on the presence or absence of cosmetic defects of the nose, were divided into two groups: the first (I) – 69 individuals (men – 30, women – 39, aged 19 to 50 years), with visible defects and deformations of the external nose, which deviated from the established aesthetic norms accepted in cosmetology, but did not distort the appearance of the face and did not violate the physiological functions of the nose; the second group (II) – 30 individuals (men – 14, women – 16, aged 19 to 30 years) who do not have cosmetic defects of the nose, however these individuals fixed unreasonably great attention on their nose, were categorically dissatisfied with it, as well as persistently demanded to change its shape. In accordance with the results of the study, the authors showed that the vast majority of the examined individuals, who referred to a plastic surgeon for rhinoplasty, have mental disorders of the nonpsychotic register, which differed depending on the presence or absence of defects and deformities of the nose. Based on the results of the study, the authors determined the predictors of the negative psychological consequences of rhinoplasty and dissatisfaction with its results (dysmorphophobia, limitation of social functioning, repeated rhinoplasty with an unrealistic expectation of results, high levels of depression and anxiety) and suggested a screening questionnaire for the timely identification of patients who would not be satisfied with a successful surgical intervention. rhinoplasty satisfaction screening questionnaire. Medicine R Biology (General) In Вісник проблем біології і медицини Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, 2018 (2020), 3, Seite 304-307 (DE-627)176059525X 25234110 nnns year:2020 number:3 pages:304-307 https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0 kostenfrei https://vpbm.com.ua/upload/2020-3(157)/70-min.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2077-4214 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4110 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 3 304-307
allfieldsGer	10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063769565 (DE-599)DOAJ57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr QH301-705.5 Bodnar L. A. verfasserin aut PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the article, the authors analyzed the results of a survey of individuals who referred to a plastic surgeon for cosmetic rhinoplasty, as well as the authors evaluated the satisfaction of the operation. All patients, depending on the presence or absence of cosmetic defects of the nose, were divided into two groups: the first (I) – 69 individuals (men – 30, women – 39, aged 19 to 50 years), with visible defects and deformations of the external nose, which deviated from the established aesthetic norms accepted in cosmetology, but did not distort the appearance of the face and did not violate the physiological functions of the nose; the second group (II) – 30 individuals (men – 14, women – 16, aged 19 to 30 years) who do not have cosmetic defects of the nose, however these individuals fixed unreasonably great attention on their nose, were categorically dissatisfied with it, as well as persistently demanded to change its shape. In accordance with the results of the study, the authors showed that the vast majority of the examined individuals, who referred to a plastic surgeon for rhinoplasty, have mental disorders of the nonpsychotic register, which differed depending on the presence or absence of defects and deformities of the nose. Based on the results of the study, the authors determined the predictors of the negative psychological consequences of rhinoplasty and dissatisfaction with its results (dysmorphophobia, limitation of social functioning, repeated rhinoplasty with an unrealistic expectation of results, high levels of depression and anxiety) and suggested a screening questionnaire for the timely identification of patients who would not be satisfied with a successful surgical intervention. rhinoplasty satisfaction screening questionnaire. Medicine R Biology (General) In Вісник проблем біології і медицини Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, 2018 (2020), 3, Seite 304-307 (DE-627)176059525X 25234110 nnns year:2020 number:3 pages:304-307 https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0 kostenfrei https://vpbm.com.ua/upload/2020-3(157)/70-min.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2077-4214 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4110 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 3 304-307
allfieldsSound	10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 doi (DE-627)DOAJ063769565 (DE-599)DOAJ57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus ukr QH301-705.5 Bodnar L. A. verfasserin aut PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY 2020 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the article, the authors analyzed the results of a survey of individuals who referred to a plastic surgeon for cosmetic rhinoplasty, as well as the authors evaluated the satisfaction of the operation. All patients, depending on the presence or absence of cosmetic defects of the nose, were divided into two groups: the first (I) – 69 individuals (men – 30, women – 39, aged 19 to 50 years), with visible defects and deformations of the external nose, which deviated from the established aesthetic norms accepted in cosmetology, but did not distort the appearance of the face and did not violate the physiological functions of the nose; the second group (II) – 30 individuals (men – 14, women – 16, aged 19 to 30 years) who do not have cosmetic defects of the nose, however these individuals fixed unreasonably great attention on their nose, were categorically dissatisfied with it, as well as persistently demanded to change its shape. In accordance with the results of the study, the authors showed that the vast majority of the examined individuals, who referred to a plastic surgeon for rhinoplasty, have mental disorders of the nonpsychotic register, which differed depending on the presence or absence of defects and deformities of the nose. Based on the results of the study, the authors determined the predictors of the negative psychological consequences of rhinoplasty and dissatisfaction with its results (dysmorphophobia, limitation of social functioning, repeated rhinoplasty with an unrealistic expectation of results, high levels of depression and anxiety) and suggested a screening questionnaire for the timely identification of patients who would not be satisfied with a successful surgical intervention. rhinoplasty satisfaction screening questionnaire. Medicine R Biology (General) In Вісник проблем біології і медицини Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, 2018 (2020), 3, Seite 304-307 (DE-627)176059525X 25234110 nnns year:2020 number:3 pages:304-307 https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0 kostenfrei https://vpbm.com.ua/upload/2020-3(157)/70-min.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2077-4214 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4110 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2020 3 304-307
language	English Russian Ukrainian
source	In Вісник проблем біології і медицини (2020), 3, Seite 304-307 year:2020 number:3 pages:304-307
sourceStr	In Вісник проблем біології і медицини (2020), 3, Seite 304-307 year:2020 number:3 pages:304-307
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	rhinoplasty satisfaction screening questionnaire. Medicine R Biology (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Вісник проблем біології і медицини
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Bodnar L. A. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	176059525X
id	DOAJ063769565
language_de	englisch russisch ukrainisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ063769565</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309032729.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ063769565</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH301-705.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bodnar L. A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the article, the authors analyzed the results of a survey of individuals who referred to a plastic surgeon for cosmetic rhinoplasty, as well as the authors evaluated the satisfaction of the operation. All patients, depending on the presence or absence of cosmetic defects of the nose, were divided into two groups: the first (I) – 69 individuals (men – 30, women – 39, aged 19 to 50 years), with visible defects and deformations of the external nose, which deviated from the established aesthetic norms accepted in cosmetology, but did not distort the appearance of the face and did not violate the physiological functions of the nose; the second group (II) – 30 individuals (men – 14, women – 16, aged 19 to 30 years) who do not have cosmetic defects of the nose, however these individuals fixed unreasonably great attention on their nose, were categorically dissatisfied with it, as well as persistently demanded to change its shape. In accordance with the results of the study, the authors showed that the vast majority of the examined individuals, who referred to a plastic surgeon for rhinoplasty, have mental disorders of the nonpsychotic register, which differed depending on the presence or absence of defects and deformities of the nose. Based on the results of the study, the authors determined the predictors of the negative psychological consequences of rhinoplasty and dissatisfaction with its results (dysmorphophobia, limitation of social functioning, repeated rhinoplasty with an unrealistic expectation of results, high levels of depression and anxiety) and suggested a screening questionnaire for the timely identification of patients who would not be satisfied with a successful surgical intervention.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rhinoplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">satisfaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">screening questionnaire.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biology (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Вісник проблем біології і медицини</subfield><subfield code="d">Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">(2020), 3, Seite 304-307</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176059525X</subfield><subfield code="x">25234110</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:304-307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://vpbm.com.ua/upload/2020-3(157)/70-min.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2077-4214</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4110</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">304-307</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	Q - Science
author	Bodnar L. A.
spellingShingle	Bodnar L. A. misc QH301-705.5 misc rhinoplasty misc satisfaction misc screening questionnaire. misc Medicine misc R misc Biology (General) PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY
authorStr	Bodnar L. A.
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)176059525X
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	QH301-705
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	25234110
topic_title	QH301-705.5 PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY rhinoplasty satisfaction screening questionnaire
topic	misc QH301-705.5 misc rhinoplasty misc satisfaction misc screening questionnaire. misc Medicine misc R misc Biology (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc QH301-705.5 misc rhinoplasty misc satisfaction misc screening questionnaire. misc Medicine misc R misc Biology (General)
topic_browse	misc QH301-705.5 misc rhinoplasty misc satisfaction misc screening questionnaire. misc Medicine misc R misc Biology (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Вісник проблем біології і медицини
hierarchy_parent_id	176059525X
hierarchy_top_title	Вісник проблем біології і медицини
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)176059525X
title	PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ063769565 (DE-599)DOAJ57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0
title_full	PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY
author_sort	Bodnar L. A.
journal	Вісник проблем біології і медицини
journalStr	Вісник проблем біології і медицини
callnumber-first-code	Q
lang_code	eng rus ukr
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2020
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	304
author_browse	Bodnar L. A.
class	QH301-705.5
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Bodnar L. A.
doi_str_mv	10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307
title_sort	psychological predictors of dissatisfaction with the results of rhinoplasty
callnumber	QH301-705.5
title_auth	PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY
abstract	In the article, the authors analyzed the results of a survey of individuals who referred to a plastic surgeon for cosmetic rhinoplasty, as well as the authors evaluated the satisfaction of the operation. All patients, depending on the presence or absence of cosmetic defects of the nose, were divided into two groups: the first (I) – 69 individuals (men – 30, women – 39, aged 19 to 50 years), with visible defects and deformations of the external nose, which deviated from the established aesthetic norms accepted in cosmetology, but did not distort the appearance of the face and did not violate the physiological functions of the nose; the second group (II) – 30 individuals (men – 14, women – 16, aged 19 to 30 years) who do not have cosmetic defects of the nose, however these individuals fixed unreasonably great attention on their nose, were categorically dissatisfied with it, as well as persistently demanded to change its shape. In accordance with the results of the study, the authors showed that the vast majority of the examined individuals, who referred to a plastic surgeon for rhinoplasty, have mental disorders of the nonpsychotic register, which differed depending on the presence or absence of defects and deformities of the nose. Based on the results of the study, the authors determined the predictors of the negative psychological consequences of rhinoplasty and dissatisfaction with its results (dysmorphophobia, limitation of social functioning, repeated rhinoplasty with an unrealistic expectation of results, high levels of depression and anxiety) and suggested a screening questionnaire for the timely identification of patients who would not be satisfied with a successful surgical intervention.
abstractGer	In the article, the authors analyzed the results of a survey of individuals who referred to a plastic surgeon for cosmetic rhinoplasty, as well as the authors evaluated the satisfaction of the operation. All patients, depending on the presence or absence of cosmetic defects of the nose, were divided into two groups: the first (I) – 69 individuals (men – 30, women – 39, aged 19 to 50 years), with visible defects and deformations of the external nose, which deviated from the established aesthetic norms accepted in cosmetology, but did not distort the appearance of the face and did not violate the physiological functions of the nose; the second group (II) – 30 individuals (men – 14, women – 16, aged 19 to 30 years) who do not have cosmetic defects of the nose, however these individuals fixed unreasonably great attention on their nose, were categorically dissatisfied with it, as well as persistently demanded to change its shape. In accordance with the results of the study, the authors showed that the vast majority of the examined individuals, who referred to a plastic surgeon for rhinoplasty, have mental disorders of the nonpsychotic register, which differed depending on the presence or absence of defects and deformities of the nose. Based on the results of the study, the authors determined the predictors of the negative psychological consequences of rhinoplasty and dissatisfaction with its results (dysmorphophobia, limitation of social functioning, repeated rhinoplasty with an unrealistic expectation of results, high levels of depression and anxiety) and suggested a screening questionnaire for the timely identification of patients who would not be satisfied with a successful surgical intervention.
abstract_unstemmed	In the article, the authors analyzed the results of a survey of individuals who referred to a plastic surgeon for cosmetic rhinoplasty, as well as the authors evaluated the satisfaction of the operation. All patients, depending on the presence or absence of cosmetic defects of the nose, were divided into two groups: the first (I) – 69 individuals (men – 30, women – 39, aged 19 to 50 years), with visible defects and deformations of the external nose, which deviated from the established aesthetic norms accepted in cosmetology, but did not distort the appearance of the face and did not violate the physiological functions of the nose; the second group (II) – 30 individuals (men – 14, women – 16, aged 19 to 30 years) who do not have cosmetic defects of the nose, however these individuals fixed unreasonably great attention on their nose, were categorically dissatisfied with it, as well as persistently demanded to change its shape. In accordance with the results of the study, the authors showed that the vast majority of the examined individuals, who referred to a plastic surgeon for rhinoplasty, have mental disorders of the nonpsychotic register, which differed depending on the presence or absence of defects and deformities of the nose. Based on the results of the study, the authors determined the predictors of the negative psychological consequences of rhinoplasty and dissatisfaction with its results (dysmorphophobia, limitation of social functioning, repeated rhinoplasty with an unrealistic expectation of results, high levels of depression and anxiety) and suggested a screening questionnaire for the timely identification of patients who would not be satisfied with a successful surgical intervention.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	3
title_short	PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY
url	https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307 https://doaj.org/article/57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0 https://vpbm.com.ua/upload/2020-3(157)/70-min.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2077-4214 https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4110
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	176059525X
callnumber-subject	QH - Natural History and Biology
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307
callnumber-a	QH301-705.5
up_date	2024-07-03T19:27:48.952Z
_version_	1803587282751455232
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ063769565</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309032729.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2020 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ063769565</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH301-705.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bodnar L. A.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the article, the authors analyzed the results of a survey of individuals who referred to a plastic surgeon for cosmetic rhinoplasty, as well as the authors evaluated the satisfaction of the operation. All patients, depending on the presence or absence of cosmetic defects of the nose, were divided into two groups: the first (I) – 69 individuals (men – 30, women – 39, aged 19 to 50 years), with visible defects and deformations of the external nose, which deviated from the established aesthetic norms accepted in cosmetology, but did not distort the appearance of the face and did not violate the physiological functions of the nose; the second group (II) – 30 individuals (men – 14, women – 16, aged 19 to 30 years) who do not have cosmetic defects of the nose, however these individuals fixed unreasonably great attention on their nose, were categorically dissatisfied with it, as well as persistently demanded to change its shape. In accordance with the results of the study, the authors showed that the vast majority of the examined individuals, who referred to a plastic surgeon for rhinoplasty, have mental disorders of the nonpsychotic register, which differed depending on the presence or absence of defects and deformities of the nose. Based on the results of the study, the authors determined the predictors of the negative psychological consequences of rhinoplasty and dissatisfaction with its results (dysmorphophobia, limitation of social functioning, repeated rhinoplasty with an unrealistic expectation of results, high levels of depression and anxiety) and suggested a screening questionnaire for the timely identification of patients who would not be satisfied with a successful surgical intervention.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">rhinoplasty</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">satisfaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">screening questionnaire.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biology (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Вісник проблем біології і медицини</subfield><subfield code="d">Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">(2020), 3, Seite 304-307</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176059525X</subfield><subfield code="x">25234110</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2020</subfield><subfield code="g">number:3</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:304-307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.29254/2077-4214-2020-3-157-304-307</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/57ee607261d14fadb94e766d7b0bb0a0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://vpbm.com.ua/upload/2020-3(157)/70-min.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2077-4214</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2523-4110</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2020</subfield><subfield code="e">3</subfield><subfield code="h">304-307</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4018955

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

PSYCHOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF DISSATISFACTION WITH THE RESULTS OF RHINOPLASTY

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?