Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study
Abstract Background: Believing research prioritization can increase the research value and augment advances in the scientific base of any profession, this study aimed to identify research priorities relevant for medical education in Sudan. Methods: The study was designed to capture a qualitative exp...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Amira Burhan [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences - Knowledge E, 2018, 17(2022), 1, Seite 116-127 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:17 ; year:2022 ; number:1 ; pages:116-127 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ064253481 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ064253481 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230309035043.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ064253481 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Amira Burhan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Background: Believing research prioritization can increase the research value and augment advances in the scientific base of any profession, this study aimed to identify research priorities relevant for medical education in Sudan. Methods: The study was designed to capture a qualitative exploration of multiple stakeholders' opinions. Data were collected from two stakeholder groups: experts and students of medical education in Sudan. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups from 10 experts and 41 learners were incorporated. The categories and subcategories, derived from experts' data inductively through constant comparison, enhanced the development of a coding framework. This framework was used deductively to analyze the beliefs and opinions of the learners leading to a list that exemplifies priorities for medical education research. Results: A set of seven principal and three minor themes were identified, the principal themes were: Curriculum Content, Design, and Delivery; Faculty Development; Assessment Methods; Research; Accreditation, Evaluation, and Quality; Professionalism; and Student Selection and Support. Four themes were identified to justify participants' selections: Quality education and patient care; Accreditation of schools; Curricula contextualization; and Documentation of success stories. Conclusion: This instrumental research fulfilled its aim to mount a set of medical education research priorities grounded in collected perceptions with optimal stakeholder engagement. Importantly, there were many more similarities than differences between these findings and those from other countries which suggests that some topics are relevant across the international arena and one may propose the commencements of an international medical education agenda. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Medicine | |
| 653 | 0 | |a R | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences |d Knowledge E, 2018 |g 17(2022), 1, Seite 116-127 |w (DE-627)62077049X |w (DE-600)2542276-5 |x 18585051 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g pages:116-127 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1858-5051 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4246 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 17 |j 2022 |e 1 |h 116-127 | ||
| author_variant |
a b ab |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18585051:2022----::eiaeuaineerhroiisomsestdnsnu |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2022 |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| allfields |
10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064253481 (DE-599)DOAJ96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Amira Burhan verfasserin aut Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background: Believing research prioritization can increase the research value and augment advances in the scientific base of any profession, this study aimed to identify research priorities relevant for medical education in Sudan. Methods: The study was designed to capture a qualitative exploration of multiple stakeholders' opinions. Data were collected from two stakeholder groups: experts and students of medical education in Sudan. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups from 10 experts and 41 learners were incorporated. The categories and subcategories, derived from experts' data inductively through constant comparison, enhanced the development of a coding framework. This framework was used deductively to analyze the beliefs and opinions of the learners leading to a list that exemplifies priorities for medical education research. Results: A set of seven principal and three minor themes were identified, the principal themes were: Curriculum Content, Design, and Delivery; Faculty Development; Assessment Methods; Research; Accreditation, Evaluation, and Quality; Professionalism; and Student Selection and Support. Four themes were identified to justify participants' selections: Quality education and patient care; Accreditation of schools; Curricula contextualization; and Documentation of success stories. Conclusion: This instrumental research fulfilled its aim to mount a set of medical education research priorities grounded in collected perceptions with optimal stakeholder engagement. Importantly, there were many more similarities than differences between these findings and those from other countries which suggests that some topics are relevant across the international arena and one may propose the commencements of an international medical education agenda. medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan Medicine R In Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Knowledge E, 2018 17(2022), 1, Seite 116-127 (DE-627)62077049X (DE-600)2542276-5 18585051 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:116-127 https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1858-5051 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4246 AR 17 2022 1 116-127 |
| spelling |
10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064253481 (DE-599)DOAJ96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Amira Burhan verfasserin aut Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background: Believing research prioritization can increase the research value and augment advances in the scientific base of any profession, this study aimed to identify research priorities relevant for medical education in Sudan. Methods: The study was designed to capture a qualitative exploration of multiple stakeholders' opinions. Data were collected from two stakeholder groups: experts and students of medical education in Sudan. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups from 10 experts and 41 learners were incorporated. The categories and subcategories, derived from experts' data inductively through constant comparison, enhanced the development of a coding framework. This framework was used deductively to analyze the beliefs and opinions of the learners leading to a list that exemplifies priorities for medical education research. Results: A set of seven principal and three minor themes were identified, the principal themes were: Curriculum Content, Design, and Delivery; Faculty Development; Assessment Methods; Research; Accreditation, Evaluation, and Quality; Professionalism; and Student Selection and Support. Four themes were identified to justify participants' selections: Quality education and patient care; Accreditation of schools; Curricula contextualization; and Documentation of success stories. Conclusion: This instrumental research fulfilled its aim to mount a set of medical education research priorities grounded in collected perceptions with optimal stakeholder engagement. Importantly, there were many more similarities than differences between these findings and those from other countries which suggests that some topics are relevant across the international arena and one may propose the commencements of an international medical education agenda. medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan Medicine R In Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Knowledge E, 2018 17(2022), 1, Seite 116-127 (DE-627)62077049X (DE-600)2542276-5 18585051 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:116-127 https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1858-5051 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4246 AR 17 2022 1 116-127 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064253481 (DE-599)DOAJ96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Amira Burhan verfasserin aut Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background: Believing research prioritization can increase the research value and augment advances in the scientific base of any profession, this study aimed to identify research priorities relevant for medical education in Sudan. Methods: The study was designed to capture a qualitative exploration of multiple stakeholders' opinions. Data were collected from two stakeholder groups: experts and students of medical education in Sudan. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups from 10 experts and 41 learners were incorporated. The categories and subcategories, derived from experts' data inductively through constant comparison, enhanced the development of a coding framework. This framework was used deductively to analyze the beliefs and opinions of the learners leading to a list that exemplifies priorities for medical education research. Results: A set of seven principal and three minor themes were identified, the principal themes were: Curriculum Content, Design, and Delivery; Faculty Development; Assessment Methods; Research; Accreditation, Evaluation, and Quality; Professionalism; and Student Selection and Support. Four themes were identified to justify participants' selections: Quality education and patient care; Accreditation of schools; Curricula contextualization; and Documentation of success stories. Conclusion: This instrumental research fulfilled its aim to mount a set of medical education research priorities grounded in collected perceptions with optimal stakeholder engagement. Importantly, there were many more similarities than differences between these findings and those from other countries which suggests that some topics are relevant across the international arena and one may propose the commencements of an international medical education agenda. medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan Medicine R In Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Knowledge E, 2018 17(2022), 1, Seite 116-127 (DE-627)62077049X (DE-600)2542276-5 18585051 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:116-127 https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1858-5051 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4246 AR 17 2022 1 116-127 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064253481 (DE-599)DOAJ96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Amira Burhan verfasserin aut Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background: Believing research prioritization can increase the research value and augment advances in the scientific base of any profession, this study aimed to identify research priorities relevant for medical education in Sudan. Methods: The study was designed to capture a qualitative exploration of multiple stakeholders' opinions. Data were collected from two stakeholder groups: experts and students of medical education in Sudan. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups from 10 experts and 41 learners were incorporated. The categories and subcategories, derived from experts' data inductively through constant comparison, enhanced the development of a coding framework. This framework was used deductively to analyze the beliefs and opinions of the learners leading to a list that exemplifies priorities for medical education research. Results: A set of seven principal and three minor themes were identified, the principal themes were: Curriculum Content, Design, and Delivery; Faculty Development; Assessment Methods; Research; Accreditation, Evaluation, and Quality; Professionalism; and Student Selection and Support. Four themes were identified to justify participants' selections: Quality education and patient care; Accreditation of schools; Curricula contextualization; and Documentation of success stories. Conclusion: This instrumental research fulfilled its aim to mount a set of medical education research priorities grounded in collected perceptions with optimal stakeholder engagement. Importantly, there were many more similarities than differences between these findings and those from other countries which suggests that some topics are relevant across the international arena and one may propose the commencements of an international medical education agenda. medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan Medicine R In Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Knowledge E, 2018 17(2022), 1, Seite 116-127 (DE-627)62077049X (DE-600)2542276-5 18585051 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:116-127 https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1858-5051 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4246 AR 17 2022 1 116-127 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064253481 (DE-599)DOAJ96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Amira Burhan verfasserin aut Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study 2022 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Abstract Background: Believing research prioritization can increase the research value and augment advances in the scientific base of any profession, this study aimed to identify research priorities relevant for medical education in Sudan. Methods: The study was designed to capture a qualitative exploration of multiple stakeholders' opinions. Data were collected from two stakeholder groups: experts and students of medical education in Sudan. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups from 10 experts and 41 learners were incorporated. The categories and subcategories, derived from experts' data inductively through constant comparison, enhanced the development of a coding framework. This framework was used deductively to analyze the beliefs and opinions of the learners leading to a list that exemplifies priorities for medical education research. Results: A set of seven principal and three minor themes were identified, the principal themes were: Curriculum Content, Design, and Delivery; Faculty Development; Assessment Methods; Research; Accreditation, Evaluation, and Quality; Professionalism; and Student Selection and Support. Four themes were identified to justify participants' selections: Quality education and patient care; Accreditation of schools; Curricula contextualization; and Documentation of success stories. Conclusion: This instrumental research fulfilled its aim to mount a set of medical education research priorities grounded in collected perceptions with optimal stakeholder engagement. Importantly, there were many more similarities than differences between these findings and those from other countries which suggests that some topics are relevant across the international arena and one may propose the commencements of an international medical education agenda. medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan Medicine R In Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences Knowledge E, 2018 17(2022), 1, Seite 116-127 (DE-627)62077049X (DE-600)2542276-5 18585051 nnns volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:116-127 https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d kostenfrei https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1858-5051 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4246 AR 17 2022 1 116-127 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences 17(2022), 1, Seite 116-127 volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:116-127 |
| sourceStr |
In Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences 17(2022), 1, Seite 116-127 volume:17 year:2022 number:1 pages:116-127 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan Medicine R |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Amira Burhan @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
62077049X |
| id |
DOAJ064253481 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ064253481</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309035043.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ064253481</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Amira Burhan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Background: Believing research prioritization can increase the research value and augment advances in the scientific base of any profession, this study aimed to identify research priorities relevant for medical education in Sudan. Methods: The study was designed to capture a qualitative exploration of multiple stakeholders' opinions. Data were collected from two stakeholder groups: experts and students of medical education in Sudan. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups from 10 experts and 41 learners were incorporated. The categories and subcategories, derived from experts' data inductively through constant comparison, enhanced the development of a coding framework. This framework was used deductively to analyze the beliefs and opinions of the learners leading to a list that exemplifies priorities for medical education research. Results: A set of seven principal and three minor themes were identified, the principal themes were: Curriculum Content, Design, and Delivery; Faculty Development; Assessment Methods; Research; Accreditation, Evaluation, and Quality; Professionalism; and Student Selection and Support. Four themes were identified to justify participants' selections: Quality education and patient care; Accreditation of schools; Curricula contextualization; and Documentation of success stories. Conclusion: This instrumental research fulfilled its aim to mount a set of medical education research priorities grounded in collected perceptions with optimal stakeholder engagement. Importantly, there were many more similarities than differences between these findings and those from other countries which suggests that some topics are relevant across the international arena and one may propose the commencements of an international medical education agenda.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">Knowledge E, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2022), 1, Seite 116-127</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)62077049X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2542276-5</subfield><subfield code="x">18585051</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:116-127</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1858-5051</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">116-127</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Amira Burhan |
| spellingShingle |
Amira Burhan misc medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan misc Medicine misc R Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study |
| authorStr |
Amira Burhan |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)62077049X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
18585051 |
| topic_title |
Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan |
| topic |
misc medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan misc Medicine misc R |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan misc Medicine misc R |
| topic_browse |
misc medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan misc Medicine misc R |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
62077049X |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)62077049X (DE-600)2542276-5 |
| title |
Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ064253481 (DE-599)DOAJ96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d |
| title_full |
Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study |
| author_sort |
Amira Burhan |
| journal |
Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences |
| journalStr |
Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2022 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
116 |
| author_browse |
Amira Burhan |
| container_volume |
17 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Amira Burhan |
| doi_str_mv |
10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 |
| title_sort |
medical education research priorities for master's students in sudan: a qualitative study |
| title_auth |
Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study |
| abstract |
Abstract Background: Believing research prioritization can increase the research value and augment advances in the scientific base of any profession, this study aimed to identify research priorities relevant for medical education in Sudan. Methods: The study was designed to capture a qualitative exploration of multiple stakeholders' opinions. Data were collected from two stakeholder groups: experts and students of medical education in Sudan. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups from 10 experts and 41 learners were incorporated. The categories and subcategories, derived from experts' data inductively through constant comparison, enhanced the development of a coding framework. This framework was used deductively to analyze the beliefs and opinions of the learners leading to a list that exemplifies priorities for medical education research. Results: A set of seven principal and three minor themes were identified, the principal themes were: Curriculum Content, Design, and Delivery; Faculty Development; Assessment Methods; Research; Accreditation, Evaluation, and Quality; Professionalism; and Student Selection and Support. Four themes were identified to justify participants' selections: Quality education and patient care; Accreditation of schools; Curricula contextualization; and Documentation of success stories. Conclusion: This instrumental research fulfilled its aim to mount a set of medical education research priorities grounded in collected perceptions with optimal stakeholder engagement. Importantly, there were many more similarities than differences between these findings and those from other countries which suggests that some topics are relevant across the international arena and one may propose the commencements of an international medical education agenda. |
| abstractGer |
Abstract Background: Believing research prioritization can increase the research value and augment advances in the scientific base of any profession, this study aimed to identify research priorities relevant for medical education in Sudan. Methods: The study was designed to capture a qualitative exploration of multiple stakeholders' opinions. Data were collected from two stakeholder groups: experts and students of medical education in Sudan. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups from 10 experts and 41 learners were incorporated. The categories and subcategories, derived from experts' data inductively through constant comparison, enhanced the development of a coding framework. This framework was used deductively to analyze the beliefs and opinions of the learners leading to a list that exemplifies priorities for medical education research. Results: A set of seven principal and three minor themes were identified, the principal themes were: Curriculum Content, Design, and Delivery; Faculty Development; Assessment Methods; Research; Accreditation, Evaluation, and Quality; Professionalism; and Student Selection and Support. Four themes were identified to justify participants' selections: Quality education and patient care; Accreditation of schools; Curricula contextualization; and Documentation of success stories. Conclusion: This instrumental research fulfilled its aim to mount a set of medical education research priorities grounded in collected perceptions with optimal stakeholder engagement. Importantly, there were many more similarities than differences between these findings and those from other countries which suggests that some topics are relevant across the international arena and one may propose the commencements of an international medical education agenda. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Abstract Background: Believing research prioritization can increase the research value and augment advances in the scientific base of any profession, this study aimed to identify research priorities relevant for medical education in Sudan. Methods: The study was designed to capture a qualitative exploration of multiple stakeholders' opinions. Data were collected from two stakeholder groups: experts and students of medical education in Sudan. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups from 10 experts and 41 learners were incorporated. The categories and subcategories, derived from experts' data inductively through constant comparison, enhanced the development of a coding framework. This framework was used deductively to analyze the beliefs and opinions of the learners leading to a list that exemplifies priorities for medical education research. Results: A set of seven principal and three minor themes were identified, the principal themes were: Curriculum Content, Design, and Delivery; Faculty Development; Assessment Methods; Research; Accreditation, Evaluation, and Quality; Professionalism; and Student Selection and Support. Four themes were identified to justify participants' selections: Quality education and patient care; Accreditation of schools; Curricula contextualization; and Documentation of success stories. Conclusion: This instrumental research fulfilled its aim to mount a set of medical education research priorities grounded in collected perceptions with optimal stakeholder engagement. Importantly, there were many more similarities than differences between these findings and those from other countries which suggests that some topics are relevant across the international arena and one may propose the commencements of an international medical education agenda. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4246 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 https://doaj.org/article/96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d https://doaj.org/toc/1858-5051 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
62077049X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T21:58:13.725Z |
| _version_ |
1803596745908682752 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ064253481</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309035043.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ064253481</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Amira Burhan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medical Education Research Priorities for Master's Students in Sudan: A Qualitative Study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Abstract Background: Believing research prioritization can increase the research value and augment advances in the scientific base of any profession, this study aimed to identify research priorities relevant for medical education in Sudan. Methods: The study was designed to capture a qualitative exploration of multiple stakeholders' opinions. Data were collected from two stakeholder groups: experts and students of medical education in Sudan. Semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups from 10 experts and 41 learners were incorporated. The categories and subcategories, derived from experts' data inductively through constant comparison, enhanced the development of a coding framework. This framework was used deductively to analyze the beliefs and opinions of the learners leading to a list that exemplifies priorities for medical education research. Results: A set of seven principal and three minor themes were identified, the principal themes were: Curriculum Content, Design, and Delivery; Faculty Development; Assessment Methods; Research; Accreditation, Evaluation, and Quality; Professionalism; and Student Selection and Support. Four themes were identified to justify participants' selections: Quality education and patient care; Accreditation of schools; Curricula contextualization; and Documentation of success stories. Conclusion: This instrumental research fulfilled its aim to mount a set of medical education research priorities grounded in collected perceptions with optimal stakeholder engagement. Importantly, there were many more similarities than differences between these findings and those from other countries which suggests that some topics are relevant across the international arena and one may propose the commencements of an international medical education agenda.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">medical education, master students, research priorities, priority setting, sudan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">Knowledge E, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">17(2022), 1, Seite 116-127</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)62077049X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2542276-5</subfield><subfield code="x">18585051</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:17</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2022</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:116-127</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/96d028a8ba9b4a6d9724f2095766177d</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.18502/sjms.v17i1.10688</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1858-5051</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">17</subfield><subfield code="j">2022</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">116-127</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4011087 |