Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice
In the last decade, there has been increased interest in measuring and modeling storage in the five forest carbon pools: the aboveground and belowground biomass (living biomass), the deadwood and litter (dead biomass), and the soil (soil organic matter). In this paper, we examined carbon storage in...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Sferlazza S [verfasserIn] Maetzke FG [verfasserIn] Iovino M [verfasserIn] Baiamonte G [verfasserIn] Palmeri V [verfasserIn] La Mela Veca DS [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2018 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry - Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF), 2019, 11(2018), 1, Seite 344-351 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:11 ; year:2018 ; number:1 ; pages:344-351 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.3832/ifor2424-011 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ064829561 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ064829561 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230309042508.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230228s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3832/ifor2424-011 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ064829561 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJd652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a SD1-669.5 | |
100 | 0 | |a Sferlazza S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In the last decade, there has been increased interest in measuring and modeling storage in the five forest carbon pools: the aboveground and belowground biomass (living biomass), the deadwood and litter (dead biomass), and the soil (soil organic matter). In this paper, we examined carbon storage in a holm oak coppice stand in the Madonie Mountains in Sicily (Italy), which is a typical case of managed coppice stands. Today, traditional coppice practices are only applied to a small number of forested areas in Sicily, such as the selected site, because of the decline in demand for wood and charcoal. The dendrometric parameters of the stands were recorded, and silvicultural indices were calculated immediately after cutting as well as during and at the end of the rotation period; they showed the trends typical of coppices. The carbon stocks in the five carbon pools were quantified to investigate the effects of coppicing on carbon storage in this Mediterranean area. Results showed that the lowest living biomass values were observed in the first years following coppicing, except for litter carbon. Belowground biomass and the soil carbon stock did not vary significantly with coppicing. During the rotation period, the aboveground biomass was completely restored, and the balance of the carbon stocks indicates that coppicing is a sustainable forest management choice from the point of view of the carbon balance, given that the logged trees are generally used for bioenergy production. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Carbon Pool | |
650 | 4 | |a Aboveground Carbon | |
650 | 4 | |a Belowground Carbon | |
650 | 4 | |a Dead Carbon | |
650 | 4 | |a Litter Carbon | |
650 | 4 | |a Soil Carbon | |
650 | 4 | |a Coppicing | |
653 | 0 | |a Forestry | |
700 | 0 | |a Maetzke FG |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Iovino M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Baiamonte G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Palmeri V |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a La Mela Veca DS |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry |d Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF), 2019 |g 11(2018), 1, Seite 344-351 |w (DE-627)565478699 |w (DE-600)2425575-0 |x 19717458 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g pages:344-351 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2424-011 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/d652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor2424-011 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 11 |j 2018 |e 1 |h 344-351 |
author_variant |
s s ss m f mf i m im b g bg p v pv l m v d lmvd |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:19717458:2018----::fetotaiinloetaaeetnabntrgiaeiernah |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2018 |
callnumber-subject-code |
SD |
publishDate |
2018 |
allfields |
10.3832/ifor2424-011 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064829561 (DE-599)DOAJd652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 Sferlazza S verfasserin aut Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the last decade, there has been increased interest in measuring and modeling storage in the five forest carbon pools: the aboveground and belowground biomass (living biomass), the deadwood and litter (dead biomass), and the soil (soil organic matter). In this paper, we examined carbon storage in a holm oak coppice stand in the Madonie Mountains in Sicily (Italy), which is a typical case of managed coppice stands. Today, traditional coppice practices are only applied to a small number of forested areas in Sicily, such as the selected site, because of the decline in demand for wood and charcoal. The dendrometric parameters of the stands were recorded, and silvicultural indices were calculated immediately after cutting as well as during and at the end of the rotation period; they showed the trends typical of coppices. The carbon stocks in the five carbon pools were quantified to investigate the effects of coppicing on carbon storage in this Mediterranean area. Results showed that the lowest living biomass values were observed in the first years following coppicing, except for litter carbon. Belowground biomass and the soil carbon stock did not vary significantly with coppicing. During the rotation period, the aboveground biomass was completely restored, and the balance of the carbon stocks indicates that coppicing is a sustainable forest management choice from the point of view of the carbon balance, given that the logged trees are generally used for bioenergy production. Carbon Pool Aboveground Carbon Belowground Carbon Dead Carbon Litter Carbon Soil Carbon Coppicing Forestry Maetzke FG verfasserin aut Iovino M verfasserin aut Baiamonte G verfasserin aut Palmeri V verfasserin aut La Mela Veca DS verfasserin aut In iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF), 2019 11(2018), 1, Seite 344-351 (DE-627)565478699 (DE-600)2425575-0 19717458 nnns volume:11 year:2018 number:1 pages:344-351 https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2424-011 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c kostenfrei https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor2424-011 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2018 1 344-351 |
spelling |
10.3832/ifor2424-011 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064829561 (DE-599)DOAJd652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 Sferlazza S verfasserin aut Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the last decade, there has been increased interest in measuring and modeling storage in the five forest carbon pools: the aboveground and belowground biomass (living biomass), the deadwood and litter (dead biomass), and the soil (soil organic matter). In this paper, we examined carbon storage in a holm oak coppice stand in the Madonie Mountains in Sicily (Italy), which is a typical case of managed coppice stands. Today, traditional coppice practices are only applied to a small number of forested areas in Sicily, such as the selected site, because of the decline in demand for wood and charcoal. The dendrometric parameters of the stands were recorded, and silvicultural indices were calculated immediately after cutting as well as during and at the end of the rotation period; they showed the trends typical of coppices. The carbon stocks in the five carbon pools were quantified to investigate the effects of coppicing on carbon storage in this Mediterranean area. Results showed that the lowest living biomass values were observed in the first years following coppicing, except for litter carbon. Belowground biomass and the soil carbon stock did not vary significantly with coppicing. During the rotation period, the aboveground biomass was completely restored, and the balance of the carbon stocks indicates that coppicing is a sustainable forest management choice from the point of view of the carbon balance, given that the logged trees are generally used for bioenergy production. Carbon Pool Aboveground Carbon Belowground Carbon Dead Carbon Litter Carbon Soil Carbon Coppicing Forestry Maetzke FG verfasserin aut Iovino M verfasserin aut Baiamonte G verfasserin aut Palmeri V verfasserin aut La Mela Veca DS verfasserin aut In iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF), 2019 11(2018), 1, Seite 344-351 (DE-627)565478699 (DE-600)2425575-0 19717458 nnns volume:11 year:2018 number:1 pages:344-351 https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2424-011 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c kostenfrei https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor2424-011 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2018 1 344-351 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.3832/ifor2424-011 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064829561 (DE-599)DOAJd652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 Sferlazza S verfasserin aut Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the last decade, there has been increased interest in measuring and modeling storage in the five forest carbon pools: the aboveground and belowground biomass (living biomass), the deadwood and litter (dead biomass), and the soil (soil organic matter). In this paper, we examined carbon storage in a holm oak coppice stand in the Madonie Mountains in Sicily (Italy), which is a typical case of managed coppice stands. Today, traditional coppice practices are only applied to a small number of forested areas in Sicily, such as the selected site, because of the decline in demand for wood and charcoal. The dendrometric parameters of the stands were recorded, and silvicultural indices were calculated immediately after cutting as well as during and at the end of the rotation period; they showed the trends typical of coppices. The carbon stocks in the five carbon pools were quantified to investigate the effects of coppicing on carbon storage in this Mediterranean area. Results showed that the lowest living biomass values were observed in the first years following coppicing, except for litter carbon. Belowground biomass and the soil carbon stock did not vary significantly with coppicing. During the rotation period, the aboveground biomass was completely restored, and the balance of the carbon stocks indicates that coppicing is a sustainable forest management choice from the point of view of the carbon balance, given that the logged trees are generally used for bioenergy production. Carbon Pool Aboveground Carbon Belowground Carbon Dead Carbon Litter Carbon Soil Carbon Coppicing Forestry Maetzke FG verfasserin aut Iovino M verfasserin aut Baiamonte G verfasserin aut Palmeri V verfasserin aut La Mela Veca DS verfasserin aut In iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF), 2019 11(2018), 1, Seite 344-351 (DE-627)565478699 (DE-600)2425575-0 19717458 nnns volume:11 year:2018 number:1 pages:344-351 https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2424-011 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c kostenfrei https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor2424-011 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2018 1 344-351 |
allfieldsGer |
10.3832/ifor2424-011 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064829561 (DE-599)DOAJd652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 Sferlazza S verfasserin aut Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the last decade, there has been increased interest in measuring and modeling storage in the five forest carbon pools: the aboveground and belowground biomass (living biomass), the deadwood and litter (dead biomass), and the soil (soil organic matter). In this paper, we examined carbon storage in a holm oak coppice stand in the Madonie Mountains in Sicily (Italy), which is a typical case of managed coppice stands. Today, traditional coppice practices are only applied to a small number of forested areas in Sicily, such as the selected site, because of the decline in demand for wood and charcoal. The dendrometric parameters of the stands were recorded, and silvicultural indices were calculated immediately after cutting as well as during and at the end of the rotation period; they showed the trends typical of coppices. The carbon stocks in the five carbon pools were quantified to investigate the effects of coppicing on carbon storage in this Mediterranean area. Results showed that the lowest living biomass values were observed in the first years following coppicing, except for litter carbon. Belowground biomass and the soil carbon stock did not vary significantly with coppicing. During the rotation period, the aboveground biomass was completely restored, and the balance of the carbon stocks indicates that coppicing is a sustainable forest management choice from the point of view of the carbon balance, given that the logged trees are generally used for bioenergy production. Carbon Pool Aboveground Carbon Belowground Carbon Dead Carbon Litter Carbon Soil Carbon Coppicing Forestry Maetzke FG verfasserin aut Iovino M verfasserin aut Baiamonte G verfasserin aut Palmeri V verfasserin aut La Mela Veca DS verfasserin aut In iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF), 2019 11(2018), 1, Seite 344-351 (DE-627)565478699 (DE-600)2425575-0 19717458 nnns volume:11 year:2018 number:1 pages:344-351 https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2424-011 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c kostenfrei https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor2424-011 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2018 1 344-351 |
allfieldsSound |
10.3832/ifor2424-011 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064829561 (DE-599)DOAJd652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SD1-669.5 Sferlazza S verfasserin aut Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice 2018 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier In the last decade, there has been increased interest in measuring and modeling storage in the five forest carbon pools: the aboveground and belowground biomass (living biomass), the deadwood and litter (dead biomass), and the soil (soil organic matter). In this paper, we examined carbon storage in a holm oak coppice stand in the Madonie Mountains in Sicily (Italy), which is a typical case of managed coppice stands. Today, traditional coppice practices are only applied to a small number of forested areas in Sicily, such as the selected site, because of the decline in demand for wood and charcoal. The dendrometric parameters of the stands were recorded, and silvicultural indices were calculated immediately after cutting as well as during and at the end of the rotation period; they showed the trends typical of coppices. The carbon stocks in the five carbon pools were quantified to investigate the effects of coppicing on carbon storage in this Mediterranean area. Results showed that the lowest living biomass values were observed in the first years following coppicing, except for litter carbon. Belowground biomass and the soil carbon stock did not vary significantly with coppicing. During the rotation period, the aboveground biomass was completely restored, and the balance of the carbon stocks indicates that coppicing is a sustainable forest management choice from the point of view of the carbon balance, given that the logged trees are generally used for bioenergy production. Carbon Pool Aboveground Carbon Belowground Carbon Dead Carbon Litter Carbon Soil Carbon Coppicing Forestry Maetzke FG verfasserin aut Iovino M verfasserin aut Baiamonte G verfasserin aut Palmeri V verfasserin aut La Mela Veca DS verfasserin aut In iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF), 2019 11(2018), 1, Seite 344-351 (DE-627)565478699 (DE-600)2425575-0 19717458 nnns volume:11 year:2018 number:1 pages:344-351 https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2424-011 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/d652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c kostenfrei https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor2424-011 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2018 1 344-351 |
language |
English |
source |
In iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 11(2018), 1, Seite 344-351 volume:11 year:2018 number:1 pages:344-351 |
sourceStr |
In iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 11(2018), 1, Seite 344-351 volume:11 year:2018 number:1 pages:344-351 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Carbon Pool Aboveground Carbon Belowground Carbon Dead Carbon Litter Carbon Soil Carbon Coppicing Forestry |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Sferlazza S @@aut@@ Maetzke FG @@aut@@ Iovino M @@aut@@ Baiamonte G @@aut@@ Palmeri V @@aut@@ La Mela Veca DS @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
565478699 |
id |
DOAJ064829561 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ064829561</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309042508.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3832/ifor2424-011</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ064829561</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SD1-669.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sferlazza S</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the last decade, there has been increased interest in measuring and modeling storage in the five forest carbon pools: the aboveground and belowground biomass (living biomass), the deadwood and litter (dead biomass), and the soil (soil organic matter). In this paper, we examined carbon storage in a holm oak coppice stand in the Madonie Mountains in Sicily (Italy), which is a typical case of managed coppice stands. Today, traditional coppice practices are only applied to a small number of forested areas in Sicily, such as the selected site, because of the decline in demand for wood and charcoal. The dendrometric parameters of the stands were recorded, and silvicultural indices were calculated immediately after cutting as well as during and at the end of the rotation period; they showed the trends typical of coppices. The carbon stocks in the five carbon pools were quantified to investigate the effects of coppicing on carbon storage in this Mediterranean area. Results showed that the lowest living biomass values were observed in the first years following coppicing, except for litter carbon. Belowground biomass and the soil carbon stock did not vary significantly with coppicing. During the rotation period, the aboveground biomass was completely restored, and the balance of the carbon stocks indicates that coppicing is a sustainable forest management choice from the point of view of the carbon balance, given that the logged trees are generally used for bioenergy production.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbon Pool</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aboveground Carbon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Belowground Carbon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dead Carbon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Litter Carbon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soil Carbon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coppicing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forestry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maetzke FG</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Iovino M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baiamonte G</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Palmeri V</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">La Mela Veca DS</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry</subfield><subfield code="d">Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF), 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2018), 1, Seite 344-351</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)565478699</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2425575-0</subfield><subfield code="x">19717458</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:344-351</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2424-011</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor2424-011</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">344-351</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
S - Agriculture |
author |
Sferlazza S |
spellingShingle |
Sferlazza S misc SD1-669.5 misc Carbon Pool misc Aboveground Carbon misc Belowground Carbon misc Dead Carbon misc Litter Carbon misc Soil Carbon misc Coppicing misc Forestry Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice |
authorStr |
Sferlazza S |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)565478699 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
SD1-669 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
19717458 |
topic_title |
SD1-669.5 Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice Carbon Pool Aboveground Carbon Belowground Carbon Dead Carbon Litter Carbon Soil Carbon Coppicing |
topic |
misc SD1-669.5 misc Carbon Pool misc Aboveground Carbon misc Belowground Carbon misc Dead Carbon misc Litter Carbon misc Soil Carbon misc Coppicing misc Forestry |
topic_unstemmed |
misc SD1-669.5 misc Carbon Pool misc Aboveground Carbon misc Belowground Carbon misc Dead Carbon misc Litter Carbon misc Soil Carbon misc Coppicing misc Forestry |
topic_browse |
misc SD1-669.5 misc Carbon Pool misc Aboveground Carbon misc Belowground Carbon misc Dead Carbon misc Litter Carbon misc Soil Carbon misc Coppicing misc Forestry |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry |
hierarchy_parent_id |
565478699 |
hierarchy_top_title |
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)565478699 (DE-600)2425575-0 |
title |
Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ064829561 (DE-599)DOAJd652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c |
title_full |
Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice |
author_sort |
Sferlazza S |
journal |
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry |
journalStr |
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry |
callnumber-first-code |
S |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2018 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
344 |
author_browse |
Sferlazza S Maetzke FG Iovino M Baiamonte G Palmeri V La Mela Veca DS |
container_volume |
11 |
class |
SD1-669.5 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Sferlazza S |
doi_str_mv |
10.3832/ifor2424-011 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a mediterranean holm oak (quercus ilex l.) coppice |
callnumber |
SD1-669.5 |
title_auth |
Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice |
abstract |
In the last decade, there has been increased interest in measuring and modeling storage in the five forest carbon pools: the aboveground and belowground biomass (living biomass), the deadwood and litter (dead biomass), and the soil (soil organic matter). In this paper, we examined carbon storage in a holm oak coppice stand in the Madonie Mountains in Sicily (Italy), which is a typical case of managed coppice stands. Today, traditional coppice practices are only applied to a small number of forested areas in Sicily, such as the selected site, because of the decline in demand for wood and charcoal. The dendrometric parameters of the stands were recorded, and silvicultural indices were calculated immediately after cutting as well as during and at the end of the rotation period; they showed the trends typical of coppices. The carbon stocks in the five carbon pools were quantified to investigate the effects of coppicing on carbon storage in this Mediterranean area. Results showed that the lowest living biomass values were observed in the first years following coppicing, except for litter carbon. Belowground biomass and the soil carbon stock did not vary significantly with coppicing. During the rotation period, the aboveground biomass was completely restored, and the balance of the carbon stocks indicates that coppicing is a sustainable forest management choice from the point of view of the carbon balance, given that the logged trees are generally used for bioenergy production. |
abstractGer |
In the last decade, there has been increased interest in measuring and modeling storage in the five forest carbon pools: the aboveground and belowground biomass (living biomass), the deadwood and litter (dead biomass), and the soil (soil organic matter). In this paper, we examined carbon storage in a holm oak coppice stand in the Madonie Mountains in Sicily (Italy), which is a typical case of managed coppice stands. Today, traditional coppice practices are only applied to a small number of forested areas in Sicily, such as the selected site, because of the decline in demand for wood and charcoal. The dendrometric parameters of the stands were recorded, and silvicultural indices were calculated immediately after cutting as well as during and at the end of the rotation period; they showed the trends typical of coppices. The carbon stocks in the five carbon pools were quantified to investigate the effects of coppicing on carbon storage in this Mediterranean area. Results showed that the lowest living biomass values were observed in the first years following coppicing, except for litter carbon. Belowground biomass and the soil carbon stock did not vary significantly with coppicing. During the rotation period, the aboveground biomass was completely restored, and the balance of the carbon stocks indicates that coppicing is a sustainable forest management choice from the point of view of the carbon balance, given that the logged trees are generally used for bioenergy production. |
abstract_unstemmed |
In the last decade, there has been increased interest in measuring and modeling storage in the five forest carbon pools: the aboveground and belowground biomass (living biomass), the deadwood and litter (dead biomass), and the soil (soil organic matter). In this paper, we examined carbon storage in a holm oak coppice stand in the Madonie Mountains in Sicily (Italy), which is a typical case of managed coppice stands. Today, traditional coppice practices are only applied to a small number of forested areas in Sicily, such as the selected site, because of the decline in demand for wood and charcoal. The dendrometric parameters of the stands were recorded, and silvicultural indices were calculated immediately after cutting as well as during and at the end of the rotation period; they showed the trends typical of coppices. The carbon stocks in the five carbon pools were quantified to investigate the effects of coppicing on carbon storage in this Mediterranean area. Results showed that the lowest living biomass values were observed in the first years following coppicing, except for litter carbon. Belowground biomass and the soil carbon stock did not vary significantly with coppicing. During the rotation period, the aboveground biomass was completely restored, and the balance of the carbon stocks indicates that coppicing is a sustainable forest management choice from the point of view of the carbon balance, given that the logged trees are generally used for bioenergy production. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
1 |
title_short |
Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2424-011 https://doaj.org/article/d652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor2424-011 https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Maetzke FG Iovino M Baiamonte G Palmeri V La Mela Veca DS |
author2Str |
Maetzke FG Iovino M Baiamonte G Palmeri V La Mela Veca DS |
ppnlink |
565478699 |
callnumber-subject |
SD - Forestry |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.3832/ifor2424-011 |
callnumber-a |
SD1-669.5 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T00:31:06.895Z |
_version_ |
1803606364678782976 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ064829561</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309042508.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3832/ifor2424-011</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ064829561</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJd652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SD1-669.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sferlazza S</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Effects of traditional forest management on carbon storage in a Mediterranean holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the last decade, there has been increased interest in measuring and modeling storage in the five forest carbon pools: the aboveground and belowground biomass (living biomass), the deadwood and litter (dead biomass), and the soil (soil organic matter). In this paper, we examined carbon storage in a holm oak coppice stand in the Madonie Mountains in Sicily (Italy), which is a typical case of managed coppice stands. Today, traditional coppice practices are only applied to a small number of forested areas in Sicily, such as the selected site, because of the decline in demand for wood and charcoal. The dendrometric parameters of the stands were recorded, and silvicultural indices were calculated immediately after cutting as well as during and at the end of the rotation period; they showed the trends typical of coppices. The carbon stocks in the five carbon pools were quantified to investigate the effects of coppicing on carbon storage in this Mediterranean area. Results showed that the lowest living biomass values were observed in the first years following coppicing, except for litter carbon. Belowground biomass and the soil carbon stock did not vary significantly with coppicing. During the rotation period, the aboveground biomass was completely restored, and the balance of the carbon stocks indicates that coppicing is a sustainable forest management choice from the point of view of the carbon balance, given that the logged trees are generally used for bioenergy production.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Carbon Pool</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aboveground Carbon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Belowground Carbon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dead Carbon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Litter Carbon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Soil Carbon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Coppicing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Forestry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maetzke FG</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Iovino M</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Baiamonte G</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Palmeri V</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">La Mela Veca DS</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry</subfield><subfield code="d">Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology (SISEF), 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2018), 1, Seite 344-351</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)565478699</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2425575-0</subfield><subfield code="x">19717458</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2018</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:344-351</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2424-011</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/d652b7fda14d45fb8033484fa2b6937c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://iforest.sisef.org/contents/?id=ifor2424-011</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1971-7458</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2018</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">344-351</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4007587 |