Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution
This article analyses the inter-relationships between India’s approach to conflict resolution at the global, regional and domestic levels, with a view to clarifying the most consistent positions of the Indian state. At the global level, while there have been some strategic silences reflecting realp...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
John Doyle [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Spanisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Revista UNISCI - UNISCI, 2017, (2019), 49, Seite 43-62 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2019 ; number:49 ; pages:43-62 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.31439/UNISCI-33 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ064868648 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ064868648 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230309042804.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.31439/UNISCI-33 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ064868648 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a spa | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a JZ2-6530 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a John Doyle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article analyses the inter-relationships between India’s approach to conflict resolution at the global, regional and domestic levels, with a view to clarifying the most consistent positions of the Indian state. At the global level, while there have been some strategic silences reflecting realpolitik, India remains a strong support of UN peacekeeping and critical of armed intervention for humanitarian purposes. At a regional level traditional security approaches dominate. There is a rhetorical commitment to regional integration as a means of building better relationships with neighbours, but India’s actions reflect a model of security and conflict resolution based on deterrence and military power-projection. At the domestic level India has a long tradition of managing internal conflicts through state formation and elite co-option. However, in the North East and in particular in Kashmir and in the Maoist conflicts there have been missed opportunities to de-escalate, when the positive conflict resolution experiences in other domestic cases have been crowded out by a highly securitized response. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a India | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Security | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conflict Resolution | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Strategy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Kashmir | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Maoist | |
| 653 | 0 | |a International relations | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Revista UNISCI |d UNISCI, 2017 |g (2019), 49, Seite 43-62 |w (DE-627)1691954934 |x 23869453 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2019 |g number:49 |g pages:43-62 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-33 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.unisci.es/indian-approaches-to-security-and-conflict-resolution/ |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2386-9453 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2010 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2019 |e 49 |h 43-62 | ||
| author_variant |
j d jd |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:23869453:2019----::ninprahsoeuiyncn |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
JZ |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
10.31439/UNISCI-33 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064868648 (DE-599)DOAJ3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa JZ2-6530 John Doyle verfasserin aut Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article analyses the inter-relationships between India’s approach to conflict resolution at the global, regional and domestic levels, with a view to clarifying the most consistent positions of the Indian state. At the global level, while there have been some strategic silences reflecting realpolitik, India remains a strong support of UN peacekeeping and critical of armed intervention for humanitarian purposes. At a regional level traditional security approaches dominate. There is a rhetorical commitment to regional integration as a means of building better relationships with neighbours, but India’s actions reflect a model of security and conflict resolution based on deterrence and military power-projection. At the domestic level India has a long tradition of managing internal conflicts through state formation and elite co-option. However, in the North East and in particular in Kashmir and in the Maoist conflicts there have been missed opportunities to de-escalate, when the positive conflict resolution experiences in other domestic cases have been crowded out by a highly securitized response. India Security Conflict Resolution Strategy Kashmir Maoist International relations In Revista UNISCI UNISCI, 2017 (2019), 49, Seite 43-62 (DE-627)1691954934 23869453 nnns year:2019 number:49 pages:43-62 https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-33 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b kostenfrei http://www.unisci.es/indian-approaches-to-security-and-conflict-resolution/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2386-9453 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2019 49 43-62 |
| spelling |
10.31439/UNISCI-33 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064868648 (DE-599)DOAJ3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa JZ2-6530 John Doyle verfasserin aut Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article analyses the inter-relationships between India’s approach to conflict resolution at the global, regional and domestic levels, with a view to clarifying the most consistent positions of the Indian state. At the global level, while there have been some strategic silences reflecting realpolitik, India remains a strong support of UN peacekeeping and critical of armed intervention for humanitarian purposes. At a regional level traditional security approaches dominate. There is a rhetorical commitment to regional integration as a means of building better relationships with neighbours, but India’s actions reflect a model of security and conflict resolution based on deterrence and military power-projection. At the domestic level India has a long tradition of managing internal conflicts through state formation and elite co-option. However, in the North East and in particular in Kashmir and in the Maoist conflicts there have been missed opportunities to de-escalate, when the positive conflict resolution experiences in other domestic cases have been crowded out by a highly securitized response. India Security Conflict Resolution Strategy Kashmir Maoist International relations In Revista UNISCI UNISCI, 2017 (2019), 49, Seite 43-62 (DE-627)1691954934 23869453 nnns year:2019 number:49 pages:43-62 https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-33 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b kostenfrei http://www.unisci.es/indian-approaches-to-security-and-conflict-resolution/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2386-9453 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2019 49 43-62 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.31439/UNISCI-33 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064868648 (DE-599)DOAJ3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa JZ2-6530 John Doyle verfasserin aut Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article analyses the inter-relationships between India’s approach to conflict resolution at the global, regional and domestic levels, with a view to clarifying the most consistent positions of the Indian state. At the global level, while there have been some strategic silences reflecting realpolitik, India remains a strong support of UN peacekeeping and critical of armed intervention for humanitarian purposes. At a regional level traditional security approaches dominate. There is a rhetorical commitment to regional integration as a means of building better relationships with neighbours, but India’s actions reflect a model of security and conflict resolution based on deterrence and military power-projection. At the domestic level India has a long tradition of managing internal conflicts through state formation and elite co-option. However, in the North East and in particular in Kashmir and in the Maoist conflicts there have been missed opportunities to de-escalate, when the positive conflict resolution experiences in other domestic cases have been crowded out by a highly securitized response. India Security Conflict Resolution Strategy Kashmir Maoist International relations In Revista UNISCI UNISCI, 2017 (2019), 49, Seite 43-62 (DE-627)1691954934 23869453 nnns year:2019 number:49 pages:43-62 https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-33 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b kostenfrei http://www.unisci.es/indian-approaches-to-security-and-conflict-resolution/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2386-9453 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2019 49 43-62 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.31439/UNISCI-33 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064868648 (DE-599)DOAJ3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa JZ2-6530 John Doyle verfasserin aut Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article analyses the inter-relationships between India’s approach to conflict resolution at the global, regional and domestic levels, with a view to clarifying the most consistent positions of the Indian state. At the global level, while there have been some strategic silences reflecting realpolitik, India remains a strong support of UN peacekeeping and critical of armed intervention for humanitarian purposes. At a regional level traditional security approaches dominate. There is a rhetorical commitment to regional integration as a means of building better relationships with neighbours, but India’s actions reflect a model of security and conflict resolution based on deterrence and military power-projection. At the domestic level India has a long tradition of managing internal conflicts through state formation and elite co-option. However, in the North East and in particular in Kashmir and in the Maoist conflicts there have been missed opportunities to de-escalate, when the positive conflict resolution experiences in other domestic cases have been crowded out by a highly securitized response. India Security Conflict Resolution Strategy Kashmir Maoist International relations In Revista UNISCI UNISCI, 2017 (2019), 49, Seite 43-62 (DE-627)1691954934 23869453 nnns year:2019 number:49 pages:43-62 https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-33 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b kostenfrei http://www.unisci.es/indian-approaches-to-security-and-conflict-resolution/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2386-9453 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2019 49 43-62 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.31439/UNISCI-33 doi (DE-627)DOAJ064868648 (DE-599)DOAJ3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa JZ2-6530 John Doyle verfasserin aut Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This article analyses the inter-relationships between India’s approach to conflict resolution at the global, regional and domestic levels, with a view to clarifying the most consistent positions of the Indian state. At the global level, while there have been some strategic silences reflecting realpolitik, India remains a strong support of UN peacekeeping and critical of armed intervention for humanitarian purposes. At a regional level traditional security approaches dominate. There is a rhetorical commitment to regional integration as a means of building better relationships with neighbours, but India’s actions reflect a model of security and conflict resolution based on deterrence and military power-projection. At the domestic level India has a long tradition of managing internal conflicts through state formation and elite co-option. However, in the North East and in particular in Kashmir and in the Maoist conflicts there have been missed opportunities to de-escalate, when the positive conflict resolution experiences in other domestic cases have been crowded out by a highly securitized response. India Security Conflict Resolution Strategy Kashmir Maoist International relations In Revista UNISCI UNISCI, 2017 (2019), 49, Seite 43-62 (DE-627)1691954934 23869453 nnns year:2019 number:49 pages:43-62 https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-33 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b kostenfrei http://www.unisci.es/indian-approaches-to-security-and-conflict-resolution/ kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2386-9453 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 2019 49 43-62 |
| language |
English Spanish |
| source |
In Revista UNISCI (2019), 49, Seite 43-62 year:2019 number:49 pages:43-62 |
| sourceStr |
In Revista UNISCI (2019), 49, Seite 43-62 year:2019 number:49 pages:43-62 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
India Security Conflict Resolution Strategy Kashmir Maoist International relations |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Revista UNISCI |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
John Doyle @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1691954934 |
| id |
DOAJ064868648 |
| language_de |
englisch spanisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ064868648</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309042804.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.31439/UNISCI-33</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ064868648</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JZ2-6530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">John Doyle</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article analyses the inter-relationships between India’s approach to conflict resolution at the global, regional and domestic levels, with a view to clarifying the most consistent positions of the Indian state. At the global level, while there have been some strategic silences reflecting realpolitik, India remains a strong support of UN peacekeeping and critical of armed intervention for humanitarian purposes. At a regional level traditional security approaches dominate. There is a rhetorical commitment to regional integration as a means of building better relationships with neighbours, but India’s actions reflect a model of security and conflict resolution based on deterrence and military power-projection. At the domestic level India has a long tradition of managing internal conflicts through state formation and elite co-option. However, in the North East and in particular in Kashmir and in the Maoist conflicts there have been missed opportunities to de-escalate, when the positive conflict resolution experiences in other domestic cases have been crowded out by a highly securitized response.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">India</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict Resolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kashmir</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Maoist</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Revista UNISCI</subfield><subfield code="d">UNISCI, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">(2019), 49, Seite 43-62</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1691954934</subfield><subfield code="x">23869453</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:49</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:43-62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-33</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.unisci.es/indian-approaches-to-security-and-conflict-resolution/</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2386-9453</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">49</subfield><subfield code="h">43-62</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
J - Political Science |
| author |
John Doyle |
| spellingShingle |
John Doyle misc JZ2-6530 misc India misc Security misc Conflict Resolution misc Strategy misc Kashmir misc Maoist misc International relations Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution |
| authorStr |
John Doyle |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1691954934 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
JZ2-6530 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
23869453 |
| topic_title |
JZ2-6530 Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution India Security Conflict Resolution Strategy Kashmir Maoist |
| topic |
misc JZ2-6530 misc India misc Security misc Conflict Resolution misc Strategy misc Kashmir misc Maoist misc International relations |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc JZ2-6530 misc India misc Security misc Conflict Resolution misc Strategy misc Kashmir misc Maoist misc International relations |
| topic_browse |
misc JZ2-6530 misc India misc Security misc Conflict Resolution misc Strategy misc Kashmir misc Maoist misc International relations |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Revista UNISCI |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1691954934 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Revista UNISCI |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1691954934 |
| title |
Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ064868648 (DE-599)DOAJ3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b |
| title_full |
Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution |
| author_sort |
John Doyle |
| journal |
Revista UNISCI |
| journalStr |
Revista UNISCI |
| callnumber-first-code |
J |
| lang_code |
eng spa |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
43 |
| author_browse |
John Doyle |
| class |
JZ2-6530 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
John Doyle |
| doi_str_mv |
10.31439/UNISCI-33 |
| title_sort |
indian approaches to security and conflict resolution |
| callnumber |
JZ2-6530 |
| title_auth |
Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution |
| abstract |
This article analyses the inter-relationships between India’s approach to conflict resolution at the global, regional and domestic levels, with a view to clarifying the most consistent positions of the Indian state. At the global level, while there have been some strategic silences reflecting realpolitik, India remains a strong support of UN peacekeeping and critical of armed intervention for humanitarian purposes. At a regional level traditional security approaches dominate. There is a rhetorical commitment to regional integration as a means of building better relationships with neighbours, but India’s actions reflect a model of security and conflict resolution based on deterrence and military power-projection. At the domestic level India has a long tradition of managing internal conflicts through state formation and elite co-option. However, in the North East and in particular in Kashmir and in the Maoist conflicts there have been missed opportunities to de-escalate, when the positive conflict resolution experiences in other domestic cases have been crowded out by a highly securitized response. |
| abstractGer |
This article analyses the inter-relationships between India’s approach to conflict resolution at the global, regional and domestic levels, with a view to clarifying the most consistent positions of the Indian state. At the global level, while there have been some strategic silences reflecting realpolitik, India remains a strong support of UN peacekeeping and critical of armed intervention for humanitarian purposes. At a regional level traditional security approaches dominate. There is a rhetorical commitment to regional integration as a means of building better relationships with neighbours, but India’s actions reflect a model of security and conflict resolution based on deterrence and military power-projection. At the domestic level India has a long tradition of managing internal conflicts through state formation and elite co-option. However, in the North East and in particular in Kashmir and in the Maoist conflicts there have been missed opportunities to de-escalate, when the positive conflict resolution experiences in other domestic cases have been crowded out by a highly securitized response. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This article analyses the inter-relationships between India’s approach to conflict resolution at the global, regional and domestic levels, with a view to clarifying the most consistent positions of the Indian state. At the global level, while there have been some strategic silences reflecting realpolitik, India remains a strong support of UN peacekeeping and critical of armed intervention for humanitarian purposes. At a regional level traditional security approaches dominate. There is a rhetorical commitment to regional integration as a means of building better relationships with neighbours, but India’s actions reflect a model of security and conflict resolution based on deterrence and military power-projection. At the domestic level India has a long tradition of managing internal conflicts through state formation and elite co-option. However, in the North East and in particular in Kashmir and in the Maoist conflicts there have been missed opportunities to de-escalate, when the positive conflict resolution experiences in other domestic cases have been crowded out by a highly securitized response. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4700 |
| container_issue |
49 |
| title_short |
Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-33 https://doaj.org/article/3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b http://www.unisci.es/indian-approaches-to-security-and-conflict-resolution/ https://doaj.org/toc/2386-9453 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
1691954934 |
| callnumber-subject |
JZ - International Relations |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.31439/UNISCI-33 |
| callnumber-a |
JZ2-6530 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T00:40:07.128Z |
| _version_ |
1803606931149946880 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ064868648</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309042804.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.31439/UNISCI-33</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ064868648</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JZ2-6530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">John Doyle</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Indian approaches to security and conflict resolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This article analyses the inter-relationships between India’s approach to conflict resolution at the global, regional and domestic levels, with a view to clarifying the most consistent positions of the Indian state. At the global level, while there have been some strategic silences reflecting realpolitik, India remains a strong support of UN peacekeeping and critical of armed intervention for humanitarian purposes. At a regional level traditional security approaches dominate. There is a rhetorical commitment to regional integration as a means of building better relationships with neighbours, but India’s actions reflect a model of security and conflict resolution based on deterrence and military power-projection. At the domestic level India has a long tradition of managing internal conflicts through state formation and elite co-option. However, in the North East and in particular in Kashmir and in the Maoist conflicts there have been missed opportunities to de-escalate, when the positive conflict resolution experiences in other domestic cases have been crowded out by a highly securitized response.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">India</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict Resolution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Kashmir</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Maoist</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Revista UNISCI</subfield><subfield code="d">UNISCI, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">(2019), 49, Seite 43-62</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1691954934</subfield><subfield code="x">23869453</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:49</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:43-62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-33</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/3829ea74e13b437cafe5888d43fb4b6b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.unisci.es/indian-approaches-to-security-and-conflict-resolution/</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2386-9453</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">49</subfield><subfield code="h">43-62</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4024754 |