Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights

Norway regularly ranks very high in reports for best countries to raise children and it is considered by many as a leader in the field of human rights. The country is not only a donor of various EEA grants for projects for children at risk, but also a direct partner for sharing good practices. On th...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Tomas Zdechovsky [verfasserIn] Marica Pirosikova [verfasserIn] Jitka Fialová [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Rumänisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	article 8 european convention on human rights barnevernet norway human rights echr key case strand lobben vs. norway

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Drepturile Omului - Institutul Român pentru Drepturile Omului, 2021, (2021), 2, Seite 7-27
Übergeordnetes Werk:	year:2021 ; number:2 ; pages:7-27

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ064882179

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ064882179
003	DE-627
005	20230309042906.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ064882179
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJa8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a rum
050		0	\|a K1-7720
100	0		\|a Tomas Zdechovsky \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Norway regularly ranks very high in reports for best countries to raise children and it is considered by many as a leader in the field of human rights. The country is not only a donor of various EEA grants for projects for children at risk, but also a direct partner for sharing good practices. On the other hand, there is strong international criticism for the actions of its Child welfare service called Barnevernet. It is blamed for taking children away from families for controversial reasons and not arranging sufficient measures to enable reunification of families as parents benefit from few visitation rights (2 times for 2 hours per year under supervision, or less). There are also complaints about forced adoption of the children to foster parents. The supreme authority that decides whether this is a human rights violation or not is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The paper therefore analyses the ECHR decisions connected to Norway, especially cases connected to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – right to respect for private and family life – and offers a quality and quantity analysis of it. Methods: Analysis of 119 ECHR cases and judgements within the HUDOC database and other relevant statistics and documents.
650		4	\|a article 8 european convention on human rights
650		4	\|a barnevernet
650		4	\|a norway
650		4	\|a human rights
650		4	\|a echr
650		4	\|a key case strand lobben vs. norway
653		0	\|a Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
700	0		\|a Marica Pirosikova \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jitka Fialová \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Drepturile Omului \|d Institutul Român pentru Drepturile Omului, 2021 \|g (2021), 2, Seite 7-27 \|w (DE-627)1041850603 \|x 26689499 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g year:2021 \|g number:2 \|g pages:7-27
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/a8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://irdo.ro/upload_irdo/upload/01_Zdechovsky_Pirosikova_Fialova.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1220-613X \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2668-9499 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_184
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_753
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2863
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4753
951			\|a AR
952			\|j 2021 \|e 2 \|h 7-27

Indexfelder

author_variant	t z tz m p mp j f jf
matchkey_str	article:26689499:2021----::owynteihtrsetaiyiermhprpciefher
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
callnumber-subject-code	K
publishDate	2021
allfields	(DE-627)DOAJ064882179 (DE-599)DOAJa8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rum K1-7720 Tomas Zdechovsky verfasserin aut Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Norway regularly ranks very high in reports for best countries to raise children and it is considered by many as a leader in the field of human rights. The country is not only a donor of various EEA grants for projects for children at risk, but also a direct partner for sharing good practices. On the other hand, there is strong international criticism for the actions of its Child welfare service called Barnevernet. It is blamed for taking children away from families for controversial reasons and not arranging sufficient measures to enable reunification of families as parents benefit from few visitation rights (2 times for 2 hours per year under supervision, or less). There are also complaints about forced adoption of the children to foster parents. The supreme authority that decides whether this is a human rights violation or not is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The paper therefore analyses the ECHR decisions connected to Norway, especially cases connected to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – right to respect for private and family life – and offers a quality and quantity analysis of it. Methods: Analysis of 119 ECHR cases and judgements within the HUDOC database and other relevant statistics and documents. article 8 european convention on human rights barnevernet norway human rights echr key case strand lobben vs. norway Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Marica Pirosikova verfasserin aut Jitka Fialová verfasserin aut In Drepturile Omului Institutul Român pentru Drepturile Omului, 2021 (2021), 2, Seite 7-27 (DE-627)1041850603 26689499 nnns year:2021 number:2 pages:7-27 https://doaj.org/article/a8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36 kostenfrei https://irdo.ro/upload_irdo/upload/01_Zdechovsky_Pirosikova_Fialova.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1220-613X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2668-9499 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_753 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2021 2 7-27
spelling	(DE-627)DOAJ064882179 (DE-599)DOAJa8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rum K1-7720 Tomas Zdechovsky verfasserin aut Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Norway regularly ranks very high in reports for best countries to raise children and it is considered by many as a leader in the field of human rights. The country is not only a donor of various EEA grants for projects for children at risk, but also a direct partner for sharing good practices. On the other hand, there is strong international criticism for the actions of its Child welfare service called Barnevernet. It is blamed for taking children away from families for controversial reasons and not arranging sufficient measures to enable reunification of families as parents benefit from few visitation rights (2 times for 2 hours per year under supervision, or less). There are also complaints about forced adoption of the children to foster parents. The supreme authority that decides whether this is a human rights violation or not is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The paper therefore analyses the ECHR decisions connected to Norway, especially cases connected to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – right to respect for private and family life – and offers a quality and quantity analysis of it. Methods: Analysis of 119 ECHR cases and judgements within the HUDOC database and other relevant statistics and documents. article 8 european convention on human rights barnevernet norway human rights echr key case strand lobben vs. norway Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Marica Pirosikova verfasserin aut Jitka Fialová verfasserin aut In Drepturile Omului Institutul Român pentru Drepturile Omului, 2021 (2021), 2, Seite 7-27 (DE-627)1041850603 26689499 nnns year:2021 number:2 pages:7-27 https://doaj.org/article/a8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36 kostenfrei https://irdo.ro/upload_irdo/upload/01_Zdechovsky_Pirosikova_Fialova.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1220-613X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2668-9499 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_753 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2021 2 7-27
allfields_unstemmed	(DE-627)DOAJ064882179 (DE-599)DOAJa8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rum K1-7720 Tomas Zdechovsky verfasserin aut Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Norway regularly ranks very high in reports for best countries to raise children and it is considered by many as a leader in the field of human rights. The country is not only a donor of various EEA grants for projects for children at risk, but also a direct partner for sharing good practices. On the other hand, there is strong international criticism for the actions of its Child welfare service called Barnevernet. It is blamed for taking children away from families for controversial reasons and not arranging sufficient measures to enable reunification of families as parents benefit from few visitation rights (2 times for 2 hours per year under supervision, or less). There are also complaints about forced adoption of the children to foster parents. The supreme authority that decides whether this is a human rights violation or not is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The paper therefore analyses the ECHR decisions connected to Norway, especially cases connected to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – right to respect for private and family life – and offers a quality and quantity analysis of it. Methods: Analysis of 119 ECHR cases and judgements within the HUDOC database and other relevant statistics and documents. article 8 european convention on human rights barnevernet norway human rights echr key case strand lobben vs. norway Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Marica Pirosikova verfasserin aut Jitka Fialová verfasserin aut In Drepturile Omului Institutul Român pentru Drepturile Omului, 2021 (2021), 2, Seite 7-27 (DE-627)1041850603 26689499 nnns year:2021 number:2 pages:7-27 https://doaj.org/article/a8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36 kostenfrei https://irdo.ro/upload_irdo/upload/01_Zdechovsky_Pirosikova_Fialova.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1220-613X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2668-9499 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_753 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2021 2 7-27
allfieldsGer	(DE-627)DOAJ064882179 (DE-599)DOAJa8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rum K1-7720 Tomas Zdechovsky verfasserin aut Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Norway regularly ranks very high in reports for best countries to raise children and it is considered by many as a leader in the field of human rights. The country is not only a donor of various EEA grants for projects for children at risk, but also a direct partner for sharing good practices. On the other hand, there is strong international criticism for the actions of its Child welfare service called Barnevernet. It is blamed for taking children away from families for controversial reasons and not arranging sufficient measures to enable reunification of families as parents benefit from few visitation rights (2 times for 2 hours per year under supervision, or less). There are also complaints about forced adoption of the children to foster parents. The supreme authority that decides whether this is a human rights violation or not is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The paper therefore analyses the ECHR decisions connected to Norway, especially cases connected to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – right to respect for private and family life – and offers a quality and quantity analysis of it. Methods: Analysis of 119 ECHR cases and judgements within the HUDOC database and other relevant statistics and documents. article 8 european convention on human rights barnevernet norway human rights echr key case strand lobben vs. norway Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Marica Pirosikova verfasserin aut Jitka Fialová verfasserin aut In Drepturile Omului Institutul Român pentru Drepturile Omului, 2021 (2021), 2, Seite 7-27 (DE-627)1041850603 26689499 nnns year:2021 number:2 pages:7-27 https://doaj.org/article/a8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36 kostenfrei https://irdo.ro/upload_irdo/upload/01_Zdechovsky_Pirosikova_Fialova.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1220-613X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2668-9499 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_753 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2021 2 7-27
allfieldsSound	(DE-627)DOAJ064882179 (DE-599)DOAJa8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rum K1-7720 Tomas Zdechovsky verfasserin aut Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Norway regularly ranks very high in reports for best countries to raise children and it is considered by many as a leader in the field of human rights. The country is not only a donor of various EEA grants for projects for children at risk, but also a direct partner for sharing good practices. On the other hand, there is strong international criticism for the actions of its Child welfare service called Barnevernet. It is blamed for taking children away from families for controversial reasons and not arranging sufficient measures to enable reunification of families as parents benefit from few visitation rights (2 times for 2 hours per year under supervision, or less). There are also complaints about forced adoption of the children to foster parents. The supreme authority that decides whether this is a human rights violation or not is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The paper therefore analyses the ECHR decisions connected to Norway, especially cases connected to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – right to respect for private and family life – and offers a quality and quantity analysis of it. Methods: Analysis of 119 ECHR cases and judgements within the HUDOC database and other relevant statistics and documents. article 8 european convention on human rights barnevernet norway human rights echr key case strand lobben vs. norway Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Marica Pirosikova verfasserin aut Jitka Fialová verfasserin aut In Drepturile Omului Institutul Român pentru Drepturile Omului, 2021 (2021), 2, Seite 7-27 (DE-627)1041850603 26689499 nnns year:2021 number:2 pages:7-27 https://doaj.org/article/a8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36 kostenfrei https://irdo.ro/upload_irdo/upload/01_Zdechovsky_Pirosikova_Fialova.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1220-613X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2668-9499 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_753 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753 AR 2021 2 7-27
language	English Romanian
source	In Drepturile Omului (2021), 2, Seite 7-27 year:2021 number:2 pages:7-27
sourceStr	In Drepturile Omului (2021), 2, Seite 7-27 year:2021 number:2 pages:7-27
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	article 8 european convention on human rights barnevernet norway human rights echr key case strand lobben vs. norway Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Drepturile Omului
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Tomas Zdechovsky @@aut@@ Marica Pirosikova @@aut@@ Jitka Fialová @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1041850603
id	DOAJ064882179
language_de	englisch rumaenisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ064882179</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309042906.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ064882179</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K1-7720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tomas Zdechovsky</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Norway regularly ranks very high in reports for best countries to raise children and it is considered by many as a leader in the field of human rights. The country is not only a donor of various EEA grants for projects for children at risk, but also a direct partner for sharing good practices. On the other hand, there is strong international criticism for the actions of its Child welfare service called Barnevernet. It is blamed for taking children away from families for controversial reasons and not arranging sufficient measures to enable reunification of families as parents benefit from few visitation rights (2 times for 2 hours per year under supervision, or less). There are also complaints about forced adoption of the children to foster parents. The supreme authority that decides whether this is a human rights violation or not is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The paper therefore analyses the ECHR decisions connected to Norway, especially cases connected to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – right to respect for private and family life – and offers a quality and quantity analysis of it. Methods: Analysis of 119 ECHR cases and judgements within the HUDOC database and other relevant statistics and documents.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">article 8 european convention on human rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">barnevernet</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">norway</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">human rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">echr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">key case strand lobben vs. norway</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marica Pirosikova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jitka Fialová</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Drepturile Omului</subfield><subfield code="d">Institutul Român pentru Drepturile Omului, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">(2021), 2, Seite 7-27</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1041850603</subfield><subfield code="x">26689499</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:7-27</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://irdo.ro/upload_irdo/upload/01_Zdechovsky_Pirosikova_Fialova.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1220-613X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2668-9499</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">7-27</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	K - Law
author	Tomas Zdechovsky
spellingShingle	Tomas Zdechovsky misc K1-7720 misc article 8 european convention on human rights misc barnevernet misc norway misc human rights misc echr misc key case strand lobben vs. norway misc Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights
authorStr	Tomas Zdechovsky
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1041850603
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	K1-7720
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	26689499
topic_title	K1-7720 Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights article 8 european convention on human rights barnevernet norway human rights echr key case strand lobben vs. norway
topic	misc K1-7720 misc article 8 european convention on human rights misc barnevernet misc norway misc human rights misc echr misc key case strand lobben vs. norway misc Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
topic_unstemmed	misc K1-7720 misc article 8 european convention on human rights misc barnevernet misc norway misc human rights misc echr misc key case strand lobben vs. norway misc Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
topic_browse	misc K1-7720 misc article 8 european convention on human rights misc barnevernet misc norway misc human rights misc echr misc key case strand lobben vs. norway misc Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Drepturile Omului
hierarchy_parent_id	1041850603
hierarchy_top_title	Drepturile Omului
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1041850603
title	Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ064882179 (DE-599)DOAJa8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36
title_full	Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights
author_sort	Tomas Zdechovsky
journal	Drepturile Omului
journalStr	Drepturile Omului
callnumber-first-code	K
lang_code	eng rum
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	7
author_browse	Tomas Zdechovsky Marica Pirosikova Jitka Fialová
class	K1-7720
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Tomas Zdechovsky
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	norway and the right to respect family life from the perspective of the european court of human rights
callnumber	K1-7720
title_auth	Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights
abstract	Norway regularly ranks very high in reports for best countries to raise children and it is considered by many as a leader in the field of human rights. The country is not only a donor of various EEA grants for projects for children at risk, but also a direct partner for sharing good practices. On the other hand, there is strong international criticism for the actions of its Child welfare service called Barnevernet. It is blamed for taking children away from families for controversial reasons and not arranging sufficient measures to enable reunification of families as parents benefit from few visitation rights (2 times for 2 hours per year under supervision, or less). There are also complaints about forced adoption of the children to foster parents. The supreme authority that decides whether this is a human rights violation or not is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The paper therefore analyses the ECHR decisions connected to Norway, especially cases connected to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – right to respect for private and family life – and offers a quality and quantity analysis of it. Methods: Analysis of 119 ECHR cases and judgements within the HUDOC database and other relevant statistics and documents.
abstractGer	Norway regularly ranks very high in reports for best countries to raise children and it is considered by many as a leader in the field of human rights. The country is not only a donor of various EEA grants for projects for children at risk, but also a direct partner for sharing good practices. On the other hand, there is strong international criticism for the actions of its Child welfare service called Barnevernet. It is blamed for taking children away from families for controversial reasons and not arranging sufficient measures to enable reunification of families as parents benefit from few visitation rights (2 times for 2 hours per year under supervision, or less). There are also complaints about forced adoption of the children to foster parents. The supreme authority that decides whether this is a human rights violation or not is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The paper therefore analyses the ECHR decisions connected to Norway, especially cases connected to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – right to respect for private and family life – and offers a quality and quantity analysis of it. Methods: Analysis of 119 ECHR cases and judgements within the HUDOC database and other relevant statistics and documents.
abstract_unstemmed	Norway regularly ranks very high in reports for best countries to raise children and it is considered by many as a leader in the field of human rights. The country is not only a donor of various EEA grants for projects for children at risk, but also a direct partner for sharing good practices. On the other hand, there is strong international criticism for the actions of its Child welfare service called Barnevernet. It is blamed for taking children away from families for controversial reasons and not arranging sufficient measures to enable reunification of families as parents benefit from few visitation rights (2 times for 2 hours per year under supervision, or less). There are also complaints about forced adoption of the children to foster parents. The supreme authority that decides whether this is a human rights violation or not is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The paper therefore analyses the ECHR decisions connected to Norway, especially cases connected to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – right to respect for private and family life – and offers a quality and quantity analysis of it. Methods: Analysis of 119 ECHR cases and judgements within the HUDOC database and other relevant statistics and documents.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_184 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_753 GBV_ILN_2001 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2006 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4035 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 GBV_ILN_4753
container_issue	2
title_short	Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights
url	https://doaj.org/article/a8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36 https://irdo.ro/upload_irdo/upload/01_Zdechovsky_Pirosikova_Fialova.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1220-613X https://doaj.org/toc/2668-9499
remote_bool	true
author2	Marica Pirosikova Jitka Fialová
author2Str	Marica Pirosikova Jitka Fialová
ppnlink	1041850603
callnumber-subject	K - General Law
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
callnumber-a	K1-7720
up_date	2024-07-04T00:42:53.397Z
_version_	1803607105494581248
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ064882179</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309042906.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ064882179</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJa8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K1-7720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tomas Zdechovsky</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Norway regularly ranks very high in reports for best countries to raise children and it is considered by many as a leader in the field of human rights. The country is not only a donor of various EEA grants for projects for children at risk, but also a direct partner for sharing good practices. On the other hand, there is strong international criticism for the actions of its Child welfare service called Barnevernet. It is blamed for taking children away from families for controversial reasons and not arranging sufficient measures to enable reunification of families as parents benefit from few visitation rights (2 times for 2 hours per year under supervision, or less). There are also complaints about forced adoption of the children to foster parents. The supreme authority that decides whether this is a human rights violation or not is the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The paper therefore analyses the ECHR decisions connected to Norway, especially cases connected to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights – right to respect for private and family life – and offers a quality and quantity analysis of it. Methods: Analysis of 119 ECHR cases and judgements within the HUDOC database and other relevant statistics and documents.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">article 8 european convention on human rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">barnevernet</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">norway</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">human rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">echr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">key case strand lobben vs. norway</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marica Pirosikova</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jitka Fialová</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Drepturile Omului</subfield><subfield code="d">Institutul Român pentru Drepturile Omului, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">(2021), 2, Seite 7-27</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1041850603</subfield><subfield code="x">26689499</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:7-27</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/a8725fbfcb4247b79ea0de3dde409c36</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://irdo.ro/upload_irdo/upload/01_Zdechovsky_Pirosikova_Fialova.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1220-613X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2668-9499</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2006</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4035</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4753</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">7-27</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401354

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Norway and the Right to Respect Family Life from the Perspective of the European Court of Human Rights

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?