Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis

<p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and meth...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Saccucci Matteo [verfasserIn] Polimeni Antonella [verfasserIn] Festa Felice [verfasserIn] Tecco Simona [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2012

Schlagwörter:	Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Head & Face Medicine - BMC, 2005, 8(2012), 1, p 15
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:8 ; year:2012 ; number:1, p 15

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1186/1746-160X-8-15

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ065140893

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ065140893
003	DE-627
005	20230309044813.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ065140893
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a RC581-951
100	0		\|a Saccucci Matteo \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
264		1	\|c 2012
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a <p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p<
650		4	\|a Condylar volume
650		4	\|a Facial morphology
650		4	\|a 3D
650		4	\|a Cone beam
653		0	\|a Specialties of internal medicine
700	0		\|a Polimeni Antonella \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Festa Felice \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Tecco Simona \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Head & Face Medicine \|d BMC, 2005 \|g 8(2012), 1, p 15 \|w (DE-627)499547799 \|w (DE-600)2202219-3 \|x 1746160X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:8 \|g year:2012 \|g number:1, p 15
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 8 \|j 2012 \|e 1, p 15

Indexfelder

author_variant	s m sm p a pa f f ff t s ts
matchkey_str	article:1746160X:2012----::okltlehlmticaatrsisorltwtcnyavlms
hierarchy_sort_str	2012
callnumber-subject-code	RC
publishDate	2012
allfields	10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 doi (DE-627)DOAJ065140893 (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-951 Saccucci Matteo verfasserin aut Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam Specialties of internal medicine Polimeni Antonella verfasserin aut Festa Felice verfasserin aut Tecco Simona verfasserin aut In Head & Face Medicine BMC, 2005 8(2012), 1, p 15 (DE-627)499547799 (DE-600)2202219-3 1746160X nnns volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 kostenfrei http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2012 1, p 15
spelling	10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 doi (DE-627)DOAJ065140893 (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-951 Saccucci Matteo verfasserin aut Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam Specialties of internal medicine Polimeni Antonella verfasserin aut Festa Felice verfasserin aut Tecco Simona verfasserin aut In Head & Face Medicine BMC, 2005 8(2012), 1, p 15 (DE-627)499547799 (DE-600)2202219-3 1746160X nnns volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 kostenfrei http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2012 1, p 15
allfields_unstemmed	10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 doi (DE-627)DOAJ065140893 (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-951 Saccucci Matteo verfasserin aut Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam Specialties of internal medicine Polimeni Antonella verfasserin aut Festa Felice verfasserin aut Tecco Simona verfasserin aut In Head & Face Medicine BMC, 2005 8(2012), 1, p 15 (DE-627)499547799 (DE-600)2202219-3 1746160X nnns volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 kostenfrei http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2012 1, p 15
allfieldsGer	10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 doi (DE-627)DOAJ065140893 (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-951 Saccucci Matteo verfasserin aut Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam Specialties of internal medicine Polimeni Antonella verfasserin aut Festa Felice verfasserin aut Tecco Simona verfasserin aut In Head & Face Medicine BMC, 2005 8(2012), 1, p 15 (DE-627)499547799 (DE-600)2202219-3 1746160X nnns volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 kostenfrei http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2012 1, p 15
allfieldsSound	10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 doi (DE-627)DOAJ065140893 (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-951 Saccucci Matteo verfasserin aut Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam Specialties of internal medicine Polimeni Antonella verfasserin aut Festa Felice verfasserin aut Tecco Simona verfasserin aut In Head & Face Medicine BMC, 2005 8(2012), 1, p 15 (DE-627)499547799 (DE-600)2202219-3 1746160X nnns volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 kostenfrei http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2012 1, p 15
language	English
source	In Head & Face Medicine 8(2012), 1, p 15 volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15
sourceStr	In Head & Face Medicine 8(2012), 1, p 15 volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam Specialties of internal medicine
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Head & Face Medicine
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Saccucci Matteo @@aut@@ Polimeni Antonella @@aut@@ Festa Felice @@aut@@ Tecco Simona @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	499547799
id	DOAJ065140893
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ065140893</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309044813.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/1746-160X-8-15</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ065140893</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC581-951</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saccucci Matteo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Condylar volume</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Facial morphology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">3D</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cone beam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Specialties of internal medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Polimeni Antonella</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Festa Felice</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tecco Simona</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Head & Face Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">BMC, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2012), 1, p 15</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)499547799</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2202219-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1746160X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1, p 15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">1, p 15</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Saccucci Matteo
spellingShingle	Saccucci Matteo misc RC581-951 misc Condylar volume misc Facial morphology misc 3D misc Cone beam misc Specialties of internal medicine Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
authorStr	Saccucci Matteo
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)499547799
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	RC581-951
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	1746160X
topic_title	RC581-951 Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam
topic	misc RC581-951 misc Condylar volume misc Facial morphology misc 3D misc Cone beam misc Specialties of internal medicine
topic_unstemmed	misc RC581-951 misc Condylar volume misc Facial morphology misc 3D misc Cone beam misc Specialties of internal medicine
topic_browse	misc RC581-951 misc Condylar volume misc Facial morphology misc 3D misc Cone beam misc Specialties of internal medicine
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Head & Face Medicine
hierarchy_parent_id	499547799
hierarchy_top_title	Head & Face Medicine
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)499547799 (DE-600)2202219-3
title	Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ065140893 (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9
title_full	Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
author_sort	Saccucci Matteo
journal	Head & Face Medicine
journalStr	Head & Face Medicine
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2012
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Saccucci Matteo Polimeni Antonella Festa Felice Tecco Simona
container_volume	8
class	RC581-951
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Saccucci Matteo
doi_str_mv	10.1186/1746-160X-8-15
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? a 3d analysis
callnumber	RC581-951
title_auth	Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
abstract	<p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p<
abstractGer	<p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p<
abstract_unstemmed	<p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p<
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1, p 15
title_short	Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
url	https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X
remote_bool	true
author2	Polimeni Antonella Festa Felice Tecco Simona
author2Str	Polimeni Antonella Festa Felice Tecco Simona
ppnlink	499547799
callnumber-subject	RC - Internal Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1186/1746-160X-8-15
callnumber-a	RC581-951
up_date	2024-07-04T01:38:19.905Z
_version_	1803610593595228160
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ065140893</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309044813.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/1746-160X-8-15</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ065140893</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC581-951</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saccucci Matteo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Condylar volume</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Facial morphology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">3D</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cone beam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Specialties of internal medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Polimeni Antonella</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Festa Felice</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tecco Simona</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Head & Face Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">BMC, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2012), 1, p 15</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)499547799</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2202219-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1746160X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1, p 15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">1, p 15</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.400731

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?