Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis
<p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and meth...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Saccucci Matteo [verfasserIn] Polimeni Antonella [verfasserIn] Festa Felice [verfasserIn] Tecco Simona [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2012 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Head & Face Medicine - BMC, 2005, 8(2012), 1, p 15 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:8 ; year:2012 ; number:1, p 15 |
Links: |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ065140893 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ065140893 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230309044813.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230228s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ065140893 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a RC581-951 | |
100 | 0 | |a Saccucci Matteo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a <p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< | ||
650 | 4 | |a Condylar volume | |
650 | 4 | |a Facial morphology | |
650 | 4 | |a 3D | |
650 | 4 | |a Cone beam | |
653 | 0 | |a Specialties of internal medicine | |
700 | 0 | |a Polimeni Antonella |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Festa Felice |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Tecco Simona |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Head & Face Medicine |d BMC, 2005 |g 8(2012), 1, p 15 |w (DE-627)499547799 |w (DE-600)2202219-3 |x 1746160X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:8 |g year:2012 |g number:1, p 15 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_170 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2003 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 8 |j 2012 |e 1, p 15 |
author_variant |
s m sm p a pa f f ff t s ts |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:1746160X:2012----::okltlehlmticaatrsisorltwtcnyavlms |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2012 |
callnumber-subject-code |
RC |
publishDate |
2012 |
allfields |
10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 doi (DE-627)DOAJ065140893 (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-951 Saccucci Matteo verfasserin aut Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam Specialties of internal medicine Polimeni Antonella verfasserin aut Festa Felice verfasserin aut Tecco Simona verfasserin aut In Head & Face Medicine BMC, 2005 8(2012), 1, p 15 (DE-627)499547799 (DE-600)2202219-3 1746160X nnns volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 kostenfrei http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2012 1, p 15 |
spelling |
10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 doi (DE-627)DOAJ065140893 (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-951 Saccucci Matteo verfasserin aut Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam Specialties of internal medicine Polimeni Antonella verfasserin aut Festa Felice verfasserin aut Tecco Simona verfasserin aut In Head & Face Medicine BMC, 2005 8(2012), 1, p 15 (DE-627)499547799 (DE-600)2202219-3 1746160X nnns volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 kostenfrei http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2012 1, p 15 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 doi (DE-627)DOAJ065140893 (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-951 Saccucci Matteo verfasserin aut Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam Specialties of internal medicine Polimeni Antonella verfasserin aut Festa Felice verfasserin aut Tecco Simona verfasserin aut In Head & Face Medicine BMC, 2005 8(2012), 1, p 15 (DE-627)499547799 (DE-600)2202219-3 1746160X nnns volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 kostenfrei http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2012 1, p 15 |
allfieldsGer |
10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 doi (DE-627)DOAJ065140893 (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-951 Saccucci Matteo verfasserin aut Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam Specialties of internal medicine Polimeni Antonella verfasserin aut Festa Felice verfasserin aut Tecco Simona verfasserin aut In Head & Face Medicine BMC, 2005 8(2012), 1, p 15 (DE-627)499547799 (DE-600)2202219-3 1746160X nnns volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 kostenfrei http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2012 1, p 15 |
allfieldsSound |
10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 doi (DE-627)DOAJ065140893 (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RC581-951 Saccucci Matteo verfasserin aut Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier <p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam Specialties of internal medicine Polimeni Antonella verfasserin aut Festa Felice verfasserin aut Tecco Simona verfasserin aut In Head & Face Medicine BMC, 2005 8(2012), 1, p 15 (DE-627)499547799 (DE-600)2202219-3 1746160X nnns volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 kostenfrei http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2012 1, p 15 |
language |
English |
source |
In Head & Face Medicine 8(2012), 1, p 15 volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15 |
sourceStr |
In Head & Face Medicine 8(2012), 1, p 15 volume:8 year:2012 number:1, p 15 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam Specialties of internal medicine |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Head & Face Medicine |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Saccucci Matteo @@aut@@ Polimeni Antonella @@aut@@ Festa Felice @@aut@@ Tecco Simona @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
499547799 |
id |
DOAJ065140893 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ065140893</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309044813.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/1746-160X-8-15</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ065140893</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC581-951</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saccucci Matteo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Condylar volume</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Facial morphology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">3D</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cone beam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Specialties of internal medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Polimeni Antonella</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Festa Felice</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tecco Simona</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Head & Face Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">BMC, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2012), 1, p 15</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)499547799</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2202219-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1746160X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1, p 15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">1, p 15</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
author |
Saccucci Matteo |
spellingShingle |
Saccucci Matteo misc RC581-951 misc Condylar volume misc Facial morphology misc 3D misc Cone beam misc Specialties of internal medicine Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis |
authorStr |
Saccucci Matteo |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)499547799 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
RC581-951 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
1746160X |
topic_title |
RC581-951 Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis Condylar volume Facial morphology 3D Cone beam |
topic |
misc RC581-951 misc Condylar volume misc Facial morphology misc 3D misc Cone beam misc Specialties of internal medicine |
topic_unstemmed |
misc RC581-951 misc Condylar volume misc Facial morphology misc 3D misc Cone beam misc Specialties of internal medicine |
topic_browse |
misc RC581-951 misc Condylar volume misc Facial morphology misc 3D misc Cone beam misc Specialties of internal medicine |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Head & Face Medicine |
hierarchy_parent_id |
499547799 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Head & Face Medicine |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)499547799 (DE-600)2202219-3 |
title |
Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ065140893 (DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 |
title_full |
Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis |
author_sort |
Saccucci Matteo |
journal |
Head & Face Medicine |
journalStr |
Head & Face Medicine |
callnumber-first-code |
R |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2012 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
author_browse |
Saccucci Matteo Polimeni Antonella Festa Felice Tecco Simona |
container_volume |
8 |
class |
RC581-951 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Saccucci Matteo |
doi_str_mv |
10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? a 3d analysis |
callnumber |
RC581-951 |
title_auth |
Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis |
abstract |
<p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< |
abstractGer |
<p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< |
abstract_unstemmed |
<p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p< |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
1, p 15 |
title_short |
Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9 http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15 https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Polimeni Antonella Festa Felice Tecco Simona |
author2Str |
Polimeni Antonella Festa Felice Tecco Simona |
ppnlink |
499547799 |
callnumber-subject |
RC - Internal Medicine |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.1186/1746-160X-8-15 |
callnumber-a |
RC581-951 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T01:38:19.905Z |
_version_ |
1803610593595228160 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ065140893</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309044813.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1186/1746-160X-8-15</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ065140893</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC581-951</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Saccucci Matteo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a"><p<Abstract</p< <p<Objective</p< <p<The purpose of this study was to determine the condylar volume in subjects with different mandibular divergence and skeletal class using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analysis software.</p< <p<Materials and methods</p< <p<For 94 patients (46 females and 48 males; mean age 24.3 ± 6.5 years), resultant rendering reconstructions of the left and right temporal mandibular joints (TMJs) were obtained.</p< <p<Subjects were then classified on the base of ANB angle the GoGn-SN angle in three classes (I, II, III) . The data of the different classes were compared.</p< <p<Results</p< <p<No significant difference was observed in the whole sample between the right and the left sides in condylar volume.</p< <p<The analysis of mean volume among low, normal and high mandibular plane angles revealed a significantly higher volume and surface in low angle subjects (p < 0.01) compared to the other groups.</p< <p<Class III subjects also tended to show a higher condylar volume and surface than class I and class II subjects, although the difference was not significant.</p< <p<Conclusions</p< <p<Higher condylar volume was a common characteristic of low angle subjects compared to normal and high mandibular plane angle subjects. Skeletal class also appears to be associated to condylar volume and surface.</p<</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Condylar volume</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Facial morphology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">3D</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cone beam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Specialties of internal medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Polimeni Antonella</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Festa Felice</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tecco Simona</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Head & Face Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">BMC, 2005</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2012), 1, p 15</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)499547799</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2202219-3</subfield><subfield code="x">1746160X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1, p 15</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-8-15</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8299aa90a69545a7ac396441eb601ff9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.head-face-med.com/8/1/15</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1746-160X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">1, p 15</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400731 |