Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study
Person-fit methodology is a promising technique for identifying subjects whose test scores have questionable validity. Less is known however about this technique’s ability to predict survey participation longitudinally. This study presents theory-derived expectations related to social desirability,...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Müller Jörg M. [verfasserIn] Hasselbach Petra [verfasserIn] Loerbroks Adrian [verfasserIn] Amelang Manfred [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; srp |
Erschienen: |
2015 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Psihologija - Drustvo Psihologa Srbije, 2009, 48(2015), 4, Seite 345-360 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:48 ; year:2015 ; number:4 ; pages:345-360 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.2298/PSI1504345M |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ06629553X |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ06629553X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230309055817.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230228s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.2298/PSI1504345M |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ06629553X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a srp | ||
050 | 0 | |a BF1-990 | |
100 | 0 | |a Müller Jörg M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Person-fit methodology is a promising technique for identifying subjects whose test scores have questionable validity. Less is known however about this technique’s ability to predict survey participation longitudinally. This study presents theory-derived expectations related to social desirability, the tendency for extreme responding and traitedness for specific deviating answer patterns and an expected consistence of person-fit scores across 27 personality scales. Data from 5,114 subjects (Amelang, 1997) were reanalysed with a polytomous-Rasch model to estimate scale scores and von Davier and Molenaar’s (2003) person-fit statistics. The person-fit statistics of the 27 scales were examined together with the 27 person parameter scores in one common factor analysis. The person-fit scores served as indicators of the latent factor ‘scalability’ while the person-parameter scores were considered to index the bias introduced by social desirability. The sign of factor loadings showed consistency and validity of the tendency for social desirability and extreme responding. Moreover, the personfit- based subject classification derived from the baseline data was able to predict subjects’ participation at a 8,5-year follow-up. However, the nature of those associations was contrary to our predictions. The discussion addresses explanations and practical implications, but also the limitations pertaining to the identification and interpretation of person-fit scores. | ||
650 | 4 | |a person-fit | |
650 | 4 | |a social desirability | |
650 | 4 | |a extreme responding | |
650 | 4 | |a cancer | |
650 | 4 | |a heart disease | |
650 | 4 | |a non-response | |
650 | 4 | |a response set | |
650 | 4 | |a response style | |
653 | 0 | |a Psychology | |
700 | 0 | |a Hasselbach Petra |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Loerbroks Adrian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Amelang Manfred |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Psihologija |d Drustvo Psihologa Srbije, 2009 |g 48(2015), 4, Seite 345-360 |w (DE-627)557876907 |w (DE-600)2405801-4 |x 14519283 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:48 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:345-360 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1504345M |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2015/0048-57051504345M.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0048-5705 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1451-9283 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_11 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_23 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_74 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2086 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2863 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4326 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4335 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 48 |j 2015 |e 4 |h 345-360 |
author_variant |
m j m mjm h p hp l a la a m am |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:14519283:2015----::esnisaitcrsosstaduvyatcptoiaou |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2015 |
callnumber-subject-code |
BF |
publishDate |
2015 |
allfields |
10.2298/PSI1504345M doi (DE-627)DOAJ06629553X (DE-599)DOAJ3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp BF1-990 Müller Jörg M. verfasserin aut Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Person-fit methodology is a promising technique for identifying subjects whose test scores have questionable validity. Less is known however about this technique’s ability to predict survey participation longitudinally. This study presents theory-derived expectations related to social desirability, the tendency for extreme responding and traitedness for specific deviating answer patterns and an expected consistence of person-fit scores across 27 personality scales. Data from 5,114 subjects (Amelang, 1997) were reanalysed with a polytomous-Rasch model to estimate scale scores and von Davier and Molenaar’s (2003) person-fit statistics. The person-fit statistics of the 27 scales were examined together with the 27 person parameter scores in one common factor analysis. The person-fit scores served as indicators of the latent factor ‘scalability’ while the person-parameter scores were considered to index the bias introduced by social desirability. The sign of factor loadings showed consistency and validity of the tendency for social desirability and extreme responding. Moreover, the personfit- based subject classification derived from the baseline data was able to predict subjects’ participation at a 8,5-year follow-up. However, the nature of those associations was contrary to our predictions. The discussion addresses explanations and practical implications, but also the limitations pertaining to the identification and interpretation of person-fit scores. person-fit social desirability extreme responding cancer heart disease non-response response set response style Psychology Hasselbach Petra verfasserin aut Loerbroks Adrian verfasserin aut Amelang Manfred verfasserin aut In Psihologija Drustvo Psihologa Srbije, 2009 48(2015), 4, Seite 345-360 (DE-627)557876907 (DE-600)2405801-4 14519283 nnns volume:48 year:2015 number:4 pages:345-360 https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1504345M kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2015/0048-57051504345M.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0048-5705 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1451-9283 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 48 2015 4 345-360 |
spelling |
10.2298/PSI1504345M doi (DE-627)DOAJ06629553X (DE-599)DOAJ3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp BF1-990 Müller Jörg M. verfasserin aut Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Person-fit methodology is a promising technique for identifying subjects whose test scores have questionable validity. Less is known however about this technique’s ability to predict survey participation longitudinally. This study presents theory-derived expectations related to social desirability, the tendency for extreme responding and traitedness for specific deviating answer patterns and an expected consistence of person-fit scores across 27 personality scales. Data from 5,114 subjects (Amelang, 1997) were reanalysed with a polytomous-Rasch model to estimate scale scores and von Davier and Molenaar’s (2003) person-fit statistics. The person-fit statistics of the 27 scales were examined together with the 27 person parameter scores in one common factor analysis. The person-fit scores served as indicators of the latent factor ‘scalability’ while the person-parameter scores were considered to index the bias introduced by social desirability. The sign of factor loadings showed consistency and validity of the tendency for social desirability and extreme responding. Moreover, the personfit- based subject classification derived from the baseline data was able to predict subjects’ participation at a 8,5-year follow-up. However, the nature of those associations was contrary to our predictions. The discussion addresses explanations and practical implications, but also the limitations pertaining to the identification and interpretation of person-fit scores. person-fit social desirability extreme responding cancer heart disease non-response response set response style Psychology Hasselbach Petra verfasserin aut Loerbroks Adrian verfasserin aut Amelang Manfred verfasserin aut In Psihologija Drustvo Psihologa Srbije, 2009 48(2015), 4, Seite 345-360 (DE-627)557876907 (DE-600)2405801-4 14519283 nnns volume:48 year:2015 number:4 pages:345-360 https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1504345M kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2015/0048-57051504345M.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0048-5705 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1451-9283 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 48 2015 4 345-360 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.2298/PSI1504345M doi (DE-627)DOAJ06629553X (DE-599)DOAJ3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp BF1-990 Müller Jörg M. verfasserin aut Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Person-fit methodology is a promising technique for identifying subjects whose test scores have questionable validity. Less is known however about this technique’s ability to predict survey participation longitudinally. This study presents theory-derived expectations related to social desirability, the tendency for extreme responding and traitedness for specific deviating answer patterns and an expected consistence of person-fit scores across 27 personality scales. Data from 5,114 subjects (Amelang, 1997) were reanalysed with a polytomous-Rasch model to estimate scale scores and von Davier and Molenaar’s (2003) person-fit statistics. The person-fit statistics of the 27 scales were examined together with the 27 person parameter scores in one common factor analysis. The person-fit scores served as indicators of the latent factor ‘scalability’ while the person-parameter scores were considered to index the bias introduced by social desirability. The sign of factor loadings showed consistency and validity of the tendency for social desirability and extreme responding. Moreover, the personfit- based subject classification derived from the baseline data was able to predict subjects’ participation at a 8,5-year follow-up. However, the nature of those associations was contrary to our predictions. The discussion addresses explanations and practical implications, but also the limitations pertaining to the identification and interpretation of person-fit scores. person-fit social desirability extreme responding cancer heart disease non-response response set response style Psychology Hasselbach Petra verfasserin aut Loerbroks Adrian verfasserin aut Amelang Manfred verfasserin aut In Psihologija Drustvo Psihologa Srbije, 2009 48(2015), 4, Seite 345-360 (DE-627)557876907 (DE-600)2405801-4 14519283 nnns volume:48 year:2015 number:4 pages:345-360 https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1504345M kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2015/0048-57051504345M.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0048-5705 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1451-9283 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 48 2015 4 345-360 |
allfieldsGer |
10.2298/PSI1504345M doi (DE-627)DOAJ06629553X (DE-599)DOAJ3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp BF1-990 Müller Jörg M. verfasserin aut Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Person-fit methodology is a promising technique for identifying subjects whose test scores have questionable validity. Less is known however about this technique’s ability to predict survey participation longitudinally. This study presents theory-derived expectations related to social desirability, the tendency for extreme responding and traitedness for specific deviating answer patterns and an expected consistence of person-fit scores across 27 personality scales. Data from 5,114 subjects (Amelang, 1997) were reanalysed with a polytomous-Rasch model to estimate scale scores and von Davier and Molenaar’s (2003) person-fit statistics. The person-fit statistics of the 27 scales were examined together with the 27 person parameter scores in one common factor analysis. The person-fit scores served as indicators of the latent factor ‘scalability’ while the person-parameter scores were considered to index the bias introduced by social desirability. The sign of factor loadings showed consistency and validity of the tendency for social desirability and extreme responding. Moreover, the personfit- based subject classification derived from the baseline data was able to predict subjects’ participation at a 8,5-year follow-up. However, the nature of those associations was contrary to our predictions. The discussion addresses explanations and practical implications, but also the limitations pertaining to the identification and interpretation of person-fit scores. person-fit social desirability extreme responding cancer heart disease non-response response set response style Psychology Hasselbach Petra verfasserin aut Loerbroks Adrian verfasserin aut Amelang Manfred verfasserin aut In Psihologija Drustvo Psihologa Srbije, 2009 48(2015), 4, Seite 345-360 (DE-627)557876907 (DE-600)2405801-4 14519283 nnns volume:48 year:2015 number:4 pages:345-360 https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1504345M kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2015/0048-57051504345M.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0048-5705 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1451-9283 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 48 2015 4 345-360 |
allfieldsSound |
10.2298/PSI1504345M doi (DE-627)DOAJ06629553X (DE-599)DOAJ3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng srp BF1-990 Müller Jörg M. verfasserin aut Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study 2015 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Person-fit methodology is a promising technique for identifying subjects whose test scores have questionable validity. Less is known however about this technique’s ability to predict survey participation longitudinally. This study presents theory-derived expectations related to social desirability, the tendency for extreme responding and traitedness for specific deviating answer patterns and an expected consistence of person-fit scores across 27 personality scales. Data from 5,114 subjects (Amelang, 1997) were reanalysed with a polytomous-Rasch model to estimate scale scores and von Davier and Molenaar’s (2003) person-fit statistics. The person-fit statistics of the 27 scales were examined together with the 27 person parameter scores in one common factor analysis. The person-fit scores served as indicators of the latent factor ‘scalability’ while the person-parameter scores were considered to index the bias introduced by social desirability. The sign of factor loadings showed consistency and validity of the tendency for social desirability and extreme responding. Moreover, the personfit- based subject classification derived from the baseline data was able to predict subjects’ participation at a 8,5-year follow-up. However, the nature of those associations was contrary to our predictions. The discussion addresses explanations and practical implications, but also the limitations pertaining to the identification and interpretation of person-fit scores. person-fit social desirability extreme responding cancer heart disease non-response response set response style Psychology Hasselbach Petra verfasserin aut Loerbroks Adrian verfasserin aut Amelang Manfred verfasserin aut In Psihologija Drustvo Psihologa Srbije, 2009 48(2015), 4, Seite 345-360 (DE-627)557876907 (DE-600)2405801-4 14519283 nnns volume:48 year:2015 number:4 pages:345-360 https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1504345M kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c kostenfrei http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2015/0048-57051504345M.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0048-5705 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1451-9283 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 48 2015 4 345-360 |
language |
English |
source |
In Psihologija 48(2015), 4, Seite 345-360 volume:48 year:2015 number:4 pages:345-360 |
sourceStr |
In Psihologija 48(2015), 4, Seite 345-360 volume:48 year:2015 number:4 pages:345-360 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
person-fit social desirability extreme responding cancer heart disease non-response response set response style Psychology |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Psihologija |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Müller Jörg M. @@aut@@ Hasselbach Petra @@aut@@ Loerbroks Adrian @@aut@@ Amelang Manfred @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
557876907 |
id |
DOAJ06629553X |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ06629553X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309055817.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2298/PSI1504345M</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ06629553X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BF1-990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Müller Jörg M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Person-fit methodology is a promising technique for identifying subjects whose test scores have questionable validity. Less is known however about this technique’s ability to predict survey participation longitudinally. This study presents theory-derived expectations related to social desirability, the tendency for extreme responding and traitedness for specific deviating answer patterns and an expected consistence of person-fit scores across 27 personality scales. Data from 5,114 subjects (Amelang, 1997) were reanalysed with a polytomous-Rasch model to estimate scale scores and von Davier and Molenaar’s (2003) person-fit statistics. The person-fit statistics of the 27 scales were examined together with the 27 person parameter scores in one common factor analysis. The person-fit scores served as indicators of the latent factor ‘scalability’ while the person-parameter scores were considered to index the bias introduced by social desirability. The sign of factor loadings showed consistency and validity of the tendency for social desirability and extreme responding. Moreover, the personfit- based subject classification derived from the baseline data was able to predict subjects’ participation at a 8,5-year follow-up. However, the nature of those associations was contrary to our predictions. The discussion addresses explanations and practical implications, but also the limitations pertaining to the identification and interpretation of person-fit scores.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">person-fit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social desirability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">extreme responding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cancer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">heart disease</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-response</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">response set</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">response style</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hasselbach Petra</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Loerbroks Adrian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Amelang Manfred</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Psihologija</subfield><subfield code="d">Drustvo Psihologa Srbije, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">48(2015), 4, Seite 345-360</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)557876907</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2405801-4</subfield><subfield code="x">14519283</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:48</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:345-360</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1504345M</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2015/0048-57051504345M.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0048-5705</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1451-9283</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">48</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">345-360</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
author |
Müller Jörg M. |
spellingShingle |
Müller Jörg M. misc BF1-990 misc person-fit misc social desirability misc extreme responding misc cancer misc heart disease misc non-response misc response set misc response style misc Psychology Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study |
authorStr |
Müller Jörg M. |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)557876907 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
BF1-990 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
14519283 |
topic_title |
BF1-990 Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study person-fit social desirability extreme responding cancer heart disease non-response response set response style |
topic |
misc BF1-990 misc person-fit misc social desirability misc extreme responding misc cancer misc heart disease misc non-response misc response set misc response style misc Psychology |
topic_unstemmed |
misc BF1-990 misc person-fit misc social desirability misc extreme responding misc cancer misc heart disease misc non-response misc response set misc response style misc Psychology |
topic_browse |
misc BF1-990 misc person-fit misc social desirability misc extreme responding misc cancer misc heart disease misc non-response misc response set misc response style misc Psychology |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Psihologija |
hierarchy_parent_id |
557876907 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Psihologija |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)557876907 (DE-600)2405801-4 |
title |
Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ06629553X (DE-599)DOAJ3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c |
title_full |
Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study |
author_sort |
Müller Jörg M. |
journal |
Psihologija |
journalStr |
Psihologija |
callnumber-first-code |
B |
lang_code |
eng srp |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2015 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
345 |
author_browse |
Müller Jörg M. Hasselbach Petra Loerbroks Adrian Amelang Manfred |
container_volume |
48 |
class |
BF1-990 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Müller Jörg M. |
doi_str_mv |
10.2298/PSI1504345M |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study |
callnumber |
BF1-990 |
title_auth |
Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study |
abstract |
Person-fit methodology is a promising technique for identifying subjects whose test scores have questionable validity. Less is known however about this technique’s ability to predict survey participation longitudinally. This study presents theory-derived expectations related to social desirability, the tendency for extreme responding and traitedness for specific deviating answer patterns and an expected consistence of person-fit scores across 27 personality scales. Data from 5,114 subjects (Amelang, 1997) were reanalysed with a polytomous-Rasch model to estimate scale scores and von Davier and Molenaar’s (2003) person-fit statistics. The person-fit statistics of the 27 scales were examined together with the 27 person parameter scores in one common factor analysis. The person-fit scores served as indicators of the latent factor ‘scalability’ while the person-parameter scores were considered to index the bias introduced by social desirability. The sign of factor loadings showed consistency and validity of the tendency for social desirability and extreme responding. Moreover, the personfit- based subject classification derived from the baseline data was able to predict subjects’ participation at a 8,5-year follow-up. However, the nature of those associations was contrary to our predictions. The discussion addresses explanations and practical implications, but also the limitations pertaining to the identification and interpretation of person-fit scores. |
abstractGer |
Person-fit methodology is a promising technique for identifying subjects whose test scores have questionable validity. Less is known however about this technique’s ability to predict survey participation longitudinally. This study presents theory-derived expectations related to social desirability, the tendency for extreme responding and traitedness for specific deviating answer patterns and an expected consistence of person-fit scores across 27 personality scales. Data from 5,114 subjects (Amelang, 1997) were reanalysed with a polytomous-Rasch model to estimate scale scores and von Davier and Molenaar’s (2003) person-fit statistics. The person-fit statistics of the 27 scales were examined together with the 27 person parameter scores in one common factor analysis. The person-fit scores served as indicators of the latent factor ‘scalability’ while the person-parameter scores were considered to index the bias introduced by social desirability. The sign of factor loadings showed consistency and validity of the tendency for social desirability and extreme responding. Moreover, the personfit- based subject classification derived from the baseline data was able to predict subjects’ participation at a 8,5-year follow-up. However, the nature of those associations was contrary to our predictions. The discussion addresses explanations and practical implications, but also the limitations pertaining to the identification and interpretation of person-fit scores. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Person-fit methodology is a promising technique for identifying subjects whose test scores have questionable validity. Less is known however about this technique’s ability to predict survey participation longitudinally. This study presents theory-derived expectations related to social desirability, the tendency for extreme responding and traitedness for specific deviating answer patterns and an expected consistence of person-fit scores across 27 personality scales. Data from 5,114 subjects (Amelang, 1997) were reanalysed with a polytomous-Rasch model to estimate scale scores and von Davier and Molenaar’s (2003) person-fit statistics. The person-fit statistics of the 27 scales were examined together with the 27 person parameter scores in one common factor analysis. The person-fit scores served as indicators of the latent factor ‘scalability’ while the person-parameter scores were considered to index the bias introduced by social desirability. The sign of factor loadings showed consistency and validity of the tendency for social desirability and extreme responding. Moreover, the personfit- based subject classification derived from the baseline data was able to predict subjects’ participation at a 8,5-year follow-up. However, the nature of those associations was contrary to our predictions. The discussion addresses explanations and practical implications, but also the limitations pertaining to the identification and interpretation of person-fit scores. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2086 GBV_ILN_2863 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
4 |
title_short |
Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1504345M https://doaj.org/article/3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2015/0048-57051504345M.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/0048-5705 https://doaj.org/toc/1451-9283 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
Hasselbach Petra Loerbroks Adrian Amelang Manfred |
author2Str |
Hasselbach Petra Loerbroks Adrian Amelang Manfred |
ppnlink |
557876907 |
callnumber-subject |
BF - Psychology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.2298/PSI1504345M |
callnumber-a |
BF1-990 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T19:17:36.384Z |
_version_ |
1803586640431546368 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ06629553X</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309055817.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.2298/PSI1504345M</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ06629553X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BF1-990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Müller Jörg M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Person-fit statistics, response sets and survey participation in a population-based cohort study</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Person-fit methodology is a promising technique for identifying subjects whose test scores have questionable validity. Less is known however about this technique’s ability to predict survey participation longitudinally. This study presents theory-derived expectations related to social desirability, the tendency for extreme responding and traitedness for specific deviating answer patterns and an expected consistence of person-fit scores across 27 personality scales. Data from 5,114 subjects (Amelang, 1997) were reanalysed with a polytomous-Rasch model to estimate scale scores and von Davier and Molenaar’s (2003) person-fit statistics. The person-fit statistics of the 27 scales were examined together with the 27 person parameter scores in one common factor analysis. The person-fit scores served as indicators of the latent factor ‘scalability’ while the person-parameter scores were considered to index the bias introduced by social desirability. The sign of factor loadings showed consistency and validity of the tendency for social desirability and extreme responding. Moreover, the personfit- based subject classification derived from the baseline data was able to predict subjects’ participation at a 8,5-year follow-up. However, the nature of those associations was contrary to our predictions. The discussion addresses explanations and practical implications, but also the limitations pertaining to the identification and interpretation of person-fit scores.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">person-fit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">social desirability</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">extreme responding</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cancer</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">heart disease</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">non-response</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">response set</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">response style</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hasselbach Petra</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Loerbroks Adrian</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Amelang Manfred</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Psihologija</subfield><subfield code="d">Drustvo Psihologa Srbije, 2009</subfield><subfield code="g">48(2015), 4, Seite 345-360</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)557876907</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2405801-4</subfield><subfield code="x">14519283</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:48</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2015</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:345-360</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1504345M</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/3d272f41ce3547249213b39b7451f24c</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2015/0048-57051504345M.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0048-5705</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1451-9283</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2086</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2863</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">48</subfield><subfield code="j">2015</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">345-360</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3974905 |