Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs

There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Darius Kalibatas [verfasserIn] Vytautas Kovaitis [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2017

Schlagwörter:	multifunctional inverted flat roof multi-criteria evaluation the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) game theory

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Journal of Civil Engineering and Management - Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2018, 23(2017), 5
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:23 ; year:2017 ; number:5

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ066727626

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ066727626
003	DE-627
005	20230309063158.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ066727626
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a TH1-9745
100	0		\|a Darius Kalibatas \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs
264		1	\|c 2017
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted flat roofs has been performed and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as building defects and mistakes made in the course of construction, have been demonstrated. Damp-proofing materials available on the market for making waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs have been evaluated. The problem of choosing the most effective membrane alternative for the investigated type of roofs is solved by analysing ten alternatives with the help of multi-criteria evaluation method, SAW and three game theory rules determined by Hurwicz, Laplace and Bayes, as well as LEVI 3.0 program. The analysis of the results has shown that the alternative No. 5 is the best membrane alternative among the ten considered options. First published online: 03 Apr 2017
650		4	\|a multifunctional inverted flat roof
650		4	\|a multi-criteria evaluation
650		4	\|a the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative
650		4	\|a MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making)
650		4	\|a SAW (Simple Additive Weighting)
650		4	\|a game theory
653		0	\|a Building construction
700	0		\|a Vytautas Kovaitis \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Journal of Civil Engineering and Management \|d Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2018 \|g 23(2017), 5 \|w (DE-627)634757601 \|w (DE-600)2571620-7 \|x 18223605 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:23 \|g year:2017 \|g number:5
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/1095 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1392-3730 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1822-3605 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2108
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2119
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4392
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 23 \|j 2017 \|e 5

Indexfelder

author_variant	d k dk v k vk
matchkey_str	article:18223605:2017----::eetnteotfetvatraiefaepofnmmrnsomli
hierarchy_sort_str	2017
callnumber-subject-code	TH
publishDate	2017
allfields	10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 doi (DE-627)DOAJ066727626 (DE-599)DOAJ853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TH1-9745 Darius Kalibatas verfasserin aut Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted flat roofs has been performed and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as building defects and mistakes made in the course of construction, have been demonstrated. Damp-proofing materials available on the market for making waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs have been evaluated. The problem of choosing the most effective membrane alternative for the investigated type of roofs is solved by analysing ten alternatives with the help of multi-criteria evaluation method, SAW and three game theory rules determined by Hurwicz, Laplace and Bayes, as well as LEVI 3.0 program. The analysis of the results has shown that the alternative No. 5 is the best membrane alternative among the ten considered options. First published online: 03 Apr 2017 multifunctional inverted flat roof multi-criteria evaluation the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) game theory Building construction Vytautas Kovaitis verfasserin aut In Journal of Civil Engineering and Management Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2018 23(2017), 5 (DE-627)634757601 (DE-600)2571620-7 18223605 nnns volume:23 year:2017 number:5 https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919 kostenfrei http://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/1095 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1392-3730 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-3605 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2017 5
spelling	10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 doi (DE-627)DOAJ066727626 (DE-599)DOAJ853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TH1-9745 Darius Kalibatas verfasserin aut Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted flat roofs has been performed and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as building defects and mistakes made in the course of construction, have been demonstrated. Damp-proofing materials available on the market for making waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs have been evaluated. The problem of choosing the most effective membrane alternative for the investigated type of roofs is solved by analysing ten alternatives with the help of multi-criteria evaluation method, SAW and three game theory rules determined by Hurwicz, Laplace and Bayes, as well as LEVI 3.0 program. The analysis of the results has shown that the alternative No. 5 is the best membrane alternative among the ten considered options. First published online: 03 Apr 2017 multifunctional inverted flat roof multi-criteria evaluation the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) game theory Building construction Vytautas Kovaitis verfasserin aut In Journal of Civil Engineering and Management Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2018 23(2017), 5 (DE-627)634757601 (DE-600)2571620-7 18223605 nnns volume:23 year:2017 number:5 https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919 kostenfrei http://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/1095 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1392-3730 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-3605 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2017 5
allfields_unstemmed	10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 doi (DE-627)DOAJ066727626 (DE-599)DOAJ853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TH1-9745 Darius Kalibatas verfasserin aut Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted flat roofs has been performed and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as building defects and mistakes made in the course of construction, have been demonstrated. Damp-proofing materials available on the market for making waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs have been evaluated. The problem of choosing the most effective membrane alternative for the investigated type of roofs is solved by analysing ten alternatives with the help of multi-criteria evaluation method, SAW and three game theory rules determined by Hurwicz, Laplace and Bayes, as well as LEVI 3.0 program. The analysis of the results has shown that the alternative No. 5 is the best membrane alternative among the ten considered options. First published online: 03 Apr 2017 multifunctional inverted flat roof multi-criteria evaluation the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) game theory Building construction Vytautas Kovaitis verfasserin aut In Journal of Civil Engineering and Management Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2018 23(2017), 5 (DE-627)634757601 (DE-600)2571620-7 18223605 nnns volume:23 year:2017 number:5 https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919 kostenfrei http://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/1095 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1392-3730 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-3605 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2017 5
allfieldsGer	10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 doi (DE-627)DOAJ066727626 (DE-599)DOAJ853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TH1-9745 Darius Kalibatas verfasserin aut Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted flat roofs has been performed and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as building defects and mistakes made in the course of construction, have been demonstrated. Damp-proofing materials available on the market for making waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs have been evaluated. The problem of choosing the most effective membrane alternative for the investigated type of roofs is solved by analysing ten alternatives with the help of multi-criteria evaluation method, SAW and three game theory rules determined by Hurwicz, Laplace and Bayes, as well as LEVI 3.0 program. The analysis of the results has shown that the alternative No. 5 is the best membrane alternative among the ten considered options. First published online: 03 Apr 2017 multifunctional inverted flat roof multi-criteria evaluation the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) game theory Building construction Vytautas Kovaitis verfasserin aut In Journal of Civil Engineering and Management Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2018 23(2017), 5 (DE-627)634757601 (DE-600)2571620-7 18223605 nnns volume:23 year:2017 number:5 https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919 kostenfrei http://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/1095 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1392-3730 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-3605 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2017 5
allfieldsSound	10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 doi (DE-627)DOAJ066727626 (DE-599)DOAJ853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TH1-9745 Darius Kalibatas verfasserin aut Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted flat roofs has been performed and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as building defects and mistakes made in the course of construction, have been demonstrated. Damp-proofing materials available on the market for making waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs have been evaluated. The problem of choosing the most effective membrane alternative for the investigated type of roofs is solved by analysing ten alternatives with the help of multi-criteria evaluation method, SAW and three game theory rules determined by Hurwicz, Laplace and Bayes, as well as LEVI 3.0 program. The analysis of the results has shown that the alternative No. 5 is the best membrane alternative among the ten considered options. First published online: 03 Apr 2017 multifunctional inverted flat roof multi-criteria evaluation the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) game theory Building construction Vytautas Kovaitis verfasserin aut In Journal of Civil Engineering and Management Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2018 23(2017), 5 (DE-627)634757601 (DE-600)2571620-7 18223605 nnns volume:23 year:2017 number:5 https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919 kostenfrei http://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/1095 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1392-3730 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1822-3605 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 23 2017 5
language	English
source	In Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 23(2017), 5 volume:23 year:2017 number:5
sourceStr	In Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 23(2017), 5 volume:23 year:2017 number:5
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	multifunctional inverted flat roof multi-criteria evaluation the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) game theory Building construction
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Darius Kalibatas @@aut@@ Vytautas Kovaitis @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	634757601
id	DOAJ066727626
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ066727626</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309063158.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ066727626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TH1-9745</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Darius Kalibatas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted flat roofs has been performed and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as building defects and mistakes made in the course of construction, have been demonstrated. Damp-proofing materials available on the market for making waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs have been evaluated. The problem of choosing the most effective membrane alternative for the investigated type of roofs is solved by analysing ten alternatives with the help of multi-criteria evaluation method, SAW and three game theory rules determined by Hurwicz, Laplace and Bayes, as well as LEVI 3.0 program. The analysis of the results has shown that the alternative No. 5 is the best membrane alternative among the ten considered options. First published online: 03 Apr 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multifunctional inverted flat roof</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multi-criteria evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">SAW (Simple Additive Weighting)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">game theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Building construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vytautas Kovaitis</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Civil Engineering and Management</subfield><subfield code="d">Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2017), 5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)634757601</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2571620-7</subfield><subfield code="x">18223605</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/1095</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1392-3730</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1822-3605</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	Darius Kalibatas
spellingShingle	Darius Kalibatas misc TH1-9745 misc multifunctional inverted flat roof misc multi-criteria evaluation misc the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative misc MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) misc SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) misc game theory misc Building construction Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs
authorStr	Darius Kalibatas
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)634757601
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	TH1-9745
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	18223605
topic_title	TH1-9745 Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs multifunctional inverted flat roof multi-criteria evaluation the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) game theory
topic	misc TH1-9745 misc multifunctional inverted flat roof misc multi-criteria evaluation misc the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative misc MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) misc SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) misc game theory misc Building construction
topic_unstemmed	misc TH1-9745 misc multifunctional inverted flat roof misc multi-criteria evaluation misc the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative misc MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) misc SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) misc game theory misc Building construction
topic_browse	misc TH1-9745 misc multifunctional inverted flat roof misc multi-criteria evaluation misc the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative misc MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) misc SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) misc game theory misc Building construction
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
hierarchy_parent_id	634757601
hierarchy_top_title	Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)634757601 (DE-600)2571620-7
title	Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ066727626 (DE-599)DOAJ853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919
title_full	Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs
author_sort	Darius Kalibatas
journal	Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
journalStr	Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2017
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Darius Kalibatas Vytautas Kovaitis
container_volume	23
class	TH1-9745
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Darius Kalibatas
doi_str_mv	10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs
callnumber	TH1-9745
title_auth	Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs
abstract	There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted flat roofs has been performed and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as building defects and mistakes made in the course of construction, have been demonstrated. Damp-proofing materials available on the market for making waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs have been evaluated. The problem of choosing the most effective membrane alternative for the investigated type of roofs is solved by analysing ten alternatives with the help of multi-criteria evaluation method, SAW and three game theory rules determined by Hurwicz, Laplace and Bayes, as well as LEVI 3.0 program. The analysis of the results has shown that the alternative No. 5 is the best membrane alternative among the ten considered options. First published online: 03 Apr 2017
abstractGer	There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted flat roofs has been performed and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as building defects and mistakes made in the course of construction, have been demonstrated. Damp-proofing materials available on the market for making waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs have been evaluated. The problem of choosing the most effective membrane alternative for the investigated type of roofs is solved by analysing ten alternatives with the help of multi-criteria evaluation method, SAW and three game theory rules determined by Hurwicz, Laplace and Bayes, as well as LEVI 3.0 program. The analysis of the results has shown that the alternative No. 5 is the best membrane alternative among the ten considered options. First published online: 03 Apr 2017
abstract_unstemmed	There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted flat roofs has been performed and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as building defects and mistakes made in the course of construction, have been demonstrated. Damp-proofing materials available on the market for making waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs have been evaluated. The problem of choosing the most effective membrane alternative for the investigated type of roofs is solved by analysing ten alternatives with the help of multi-criteria evaluation method, SAW and three game theory rules determined by Hurwicz, Laplace and Bayes, as well as LEVI 3.0 program. The analysis of the results has shown that the alternative No. 5 is the best membrane alternative among the ten considered options. First published online: 03 Apr 2017
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_2119 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4392 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	5
title_short	Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs
url	https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808 https://doaj.org/article/853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919 http://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/1095 https://doaj.org/toc/1392-3730 https://doaj.org/toc/1822-3605
remote_bool	true
author2	Vytautas Kovaitis
author2Str	Vytautas Kovaitis
ppnlink	634757601
callnumber-subject	TH - Building Construction
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808
callnumber-a	TH1-9745
up_date	2024-07-03T21:40:14.274Z
_version_	1803595614032756736
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ066727626</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309063158.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2017 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ066727626</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TH1-9745</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Darius Kalibatas</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">There are many various methods, techniques and materials for constructing multifunctional inverted flat roofs now. However, in practice, the constructed roofs of this type often have various defects, whose elimination is rather costly. To solve this problem, the analysis of multifunctional inverted flat roofs has been performed and their advantages and disadvantages, as well as building defects and mistakes made in the course of construction, have been demonstrated. Damp-proofing materials available on the market for making waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs have been evaluated. The problem of choosing the most effective membrane alternative for the investigated type of roofs is solved by analysing ten alternatives with the help of multi-criteria evaluation method, SAW and three game theory rules determined by Hurwicz, Laplace and Bayes, as well as LEVI 3.0 program. The analysis of the results has shown that the alternative No. 5 is the best membrane alternative among the ten considered options. First published online: 03 Apr 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multifunctional inverted flat roof</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">multi-criteria evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">the selection of the best waterproofing membrane alternative</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">SAW (Simple Additive Weighting)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">game theory</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Building construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vytautas Kovaitis</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Civil Engineering and Management</subfield><subfield code="d">Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">23(2017), 5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)634757601</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2571620-7</subfield><subfield code="x">18223605</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:23</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2016.1250808</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/853d629b46c04588bc4824d4bbaea919</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/1095</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1392-3730</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1822-3605</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2119</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4392</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">23</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4030848

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Selecting the most effective alternative of waterproofing membranes for multifunctional inverted flat roofs

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?