Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus
A study was undertaken to identify Marek’s disease virus (MDV) antigen by PCR and AGID and to test the significance of PCR and AGID by McNemar’s test in detection of MDV antigen in outbreak in layer flocks. A total of twelve different MD outbreak flocks with varying flock size were selected in this...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran [verfasserIn] G. Selvaraju [verfasserIn] K. Jayalakshmi [verfasserIn] T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy [verfasserIn] M. Geetha and S. Saravanan [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2010 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Veterinary World - Veterinary World, 2011, 3(2010), 5.000, Seite 212-214 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:3 ; year:2010 ; number:5.000 ; pages:212-214 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ067331467 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ067331467 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230309070210.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230228s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ067331467 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a SF1-1100 | |
050 | 0 | |a SF600-1100 | |
100 | 0 | |a A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a A study was undertaken to identify Marek’s disease virus (MDV) antigen by PCR and AGID and to test the significance of PCR and AGID by McNemar’s test in detection of MDV antigen in outbreak in layer flocks. A total of twelve different MD outbreak flocks with varying flock size were selected in this study. Feather follicles were collected from 10 apparently healthy birds, 10 clinically affected birds and 10 dead birds separately in each outbreak. All the samples were subjected to PCR and AGID. In PCR, 42 (35.00%), 68 (56.67%) and 106 (88.33%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively and in AGID 28 (23.33%), 56 (46.67%) and 98 (81.67%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively. In testing the significance of PCR and AGID in detecting MDV, significant difference existed between the two tests in feather tips of apparently healthy birds (P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between PCR and AGID in detection of MDV in feather tips of clinically affected and dead birds (P > 0.05). Hence, PCR can be used to screen MDV in apparently healthy birds and AGID can be used to screen MDV in clinically affected and dead birds keeping feasibility and economic consideration. [Vet. World 2010; 3(5.000): 212-214] | ||
650 | 4 | |a Marek’s disease | |
650 | 4 | |a Herpesvirus of turkey | |
650 | 4 | |a Polymerase chain reaction | |
650 | 4 | |a Agar gel immunodiffusion test | |
653 | 0 | |a Animal culture | |
653 | 0 | |a Veterinary medicine | |
700 | 0 | |a G. Selvaraju |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a K. Jayalakshmi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a M. Geetha and S. Saravanan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Veterinary World |d Veterinary World, 2011 |g 3(2010), 5.000, Seite 212-214 |w (DE-627)582020751 |w (DE-600)2456277-4 |x 22310916 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2010 |g number:5.000 |g pages:212-214 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.scopemed.org/mnstemps/2/2-1296640457.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0972-8988 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_20 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_22 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_24 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_31 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_39 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_40 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_60 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_62 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_63 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_65 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_70 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_73 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_95 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_105 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_110 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_151 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_161 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_206 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_213 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_230 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_252 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_285 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_293 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_602 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2005 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2011 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2014 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4012 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4037 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4112 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4125 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4126 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4249 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4305 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4306 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4307 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4313 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4322 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4323 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4324 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4325 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4338 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4367 | ||
912 | |a GBV_ILN_4700 | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 3 |j 2010 |e 5.000 |h 212-214 |
author_variant |
a m d amd g s gs k j kj t g m tgm m g a s s mgass |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:22310916:2010----::oprsooplmrscanecinnaaglmuoifsotsidtci |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2010 |
callnumber-subject-code |
SF |
publishDate |
2010 |
allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ067331467 (DE-599)DOAJ55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF1-1100 SF600-1100 A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran verfasserin aut Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A study was undertaken to identify Marek’s disease virus (MDV) antigen by PCR and AGID and to test the significance of PCR and AGID by McNemar’s test in detection of MDV antigen in outbreak in layer flocks. A total of twelve different MD outbreak flocks with varying flock size were selected in this study. Feather follicles were collected from 10 apparently healthy birds, 10 clinically affected birds and 10 dead birds separately in each outbreak. All the samples were subjected to PCR and AGID. In PCR, 42 (35.00%), 68 (56.67%) and 106 (88.33%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively and in AGID 28 (23.33%), 56 (46.67%) and 98 (81.67%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively. In testing the significance of PCR and AGID in detecting MDV, significant difference existed between the two tests in feather tips of apparently healthy birds (P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between PCR and AGID in detection of MDV in feather tips of clinically affected and dead birds (P > 0.05). Hence, PCR can be used to screen MDV in apparently healthy birds and AGID can be used to screen MDV in clinically affected and dead birds keeping feasibility and economic consideration. [Vet. World 2010; 3(5.000): 212-214] Marek’s disease Herpesvirus of turkey Polymerase chain reaction Agar gel immunodiffusion test Animal culture Veterinary medicine G. Selvaraju verfasserin aut K. Jayalakshmi verfasserin aut T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy verfasserin aut M. Geetha and S. Saravanan verfasserin aut In Veterinary World Veterinary World, 2011 3(2010), 5.000, Seite 212-214 (DE-627)582020751 (DE-600)2456277-4 22310916 nnns volume:3 year:2010 number:5.000 pages:212-214 https://doaj.org/article/55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b kostenfrei http://www.scopemed.org/mnstemps/2/2-1296640457.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0972-8988 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2010 5.000 212-214 |
spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ067331467 (DE-599)DOAJ55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF1-1100 SF600-1100 A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran verfasserin aut Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A study was undertaken to identify Marek’s disease virus (MDV) antigen by PCR and AGID and to test the significance of PCR and AGID by McNemar’s test in detection of MDV antigen in outbreak in layer flocks. A total of twelve different MD outbreak flocks with varying flock size were selected in this study. Feather follicles were collected from 10 apparently healthy birds, 10 clinically affected birds and 10 dead birds separately in each outbreak. All the samples were subjected to PCR and AGID. In PCR, 42 (35.00%), 68 (56.67%) and 106 (88.33%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively and in AGID 28 (23.33%), 56 (46.67%) and 98 (81.67%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively. In testing the significance of PCR and AGID in detecting MDV, significant difference existed between the two tests in feather tips of apparently healthy birds (P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between PCR and AGID in detection of MDV in feather tips of clinically affected and dead birds (P > 0.05). Hence, PCR can be used to screen MDV in apparently healthy birds and AGID can be used to screen MDV in clinically affected and dead birds keeping feasibility and economic consideration. [Vet. World 2010; 3(5.000): 212-214] Marek’s disease Herpesvirus of turkey Polymerase chain reaction Agar gel immunodiffusion test Animal culture Veterinary medicine G. Selvaraju verfasserin aut K. Jayalakshmi verfasserin aut T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy verfasserin aut M. Geetha and S. Saravanan verfasserin aut In Veterinary World Veterinary World, 2011 3(2010), 5.000, Seite 212-214 (DE-627)582020751 (DE-600)2456277-4 22310916 nnns volume:3 year:2010 number:5.000 pages:212-214 https://doaj.org/article/55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b kostenfrei http://www.scopemed.org/mnstemps/2/2-1296640457.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0972-8988 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2010 5.000 212-214 |
allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ067331467 (DE-599)DOAJ55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF1-1100 SF600-1100 A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran verfasserin aut Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A study was undertaken to identify Marek’s disease virus (MDV) antigen by PCR and AGID and to test the significance of PCR and AGID by McNemar’s test in detection of MDV antigen in outbreak in layer flocks. A total of twelve different MD outbreak flocks with varying flock size were selected in this study. Feather follicles were collected from 10 apparently healthy birds, 10 clinically affected birds and 10 dead birds separately in each outbreak. All the samples were subjected to PCR and AGID. In PCR, 42 (35.00%), 68 (56.67%) and 106 (88.33%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively and in AGID 28 (23.33%), 56 (46.67%) and 98 (81.67%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively. In testing the significance of PCR and AGID in detecting MDV, significant difference existed between the two tests in feather tips of apparently healthy birds (P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between PCR and AGID in detection of MDV in feather tips of clinically affected and dead birds (P > 0.05). Hence, PCR can be used to screen MDV in apparently healthy birds and AGID can be used to screen MDV in clinically affected and dead birds keeping feasibility and economic consideration. [Vet. World 2010; 3(5.000): 212-214] Marek’s disease Herpesvirus of turkey Polymerase chain reaction Agar gel immunodiffusion test Animal culture Veterinary medicine G. Selvaraju verfasserin aut K. Jayalakshmi verfasserin aut T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy verfasserin aut M. Geetha and S. Saravanan verfasserin aut In Veterinary World Veterinary World, 2011 3(2010), 5.000, Seite 212-214 (DE-627)582020751 (DE-600)2456277-4 22310916 nnns volume:3 year:2010 number:5.000 pages:212-214 https://doaj.org/article/55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b kostenfrei http://www.scopemed.org/mnstemps/2/2-1296640457.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0972-8988 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2010 5.000 212-214 |
allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ067331467 (DE-599)DOAJ55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF1-1100 SF600-1100 A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran verfasserin aut Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A study was undertaken to identify Marek’s disease virus (MDV) antigen by PCR and AGID and to test the significance of PCR and AGID by McNemar’s test in detection of MDV antigen in outbreak in layer flocks. A total of twelve different MD outbreak flocks with varying flock size were selected in this study. Feather follicles were collected from 10 apparently healthy birds, 10 clinically affected birds and 10 dead birds separately in each outbreak. All the samples were subjected to PCR and AGID. In PCR, 42 (35.00%), 68 (56.67%) and 106 (88.33%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively and in AGID 28 (23.33%), 56 (46.67%) and 98 (81.67%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively. In testing the significance of PCR and AGID in detecting MDV, significant difference existed between the two tests in feather tips of apparently healthy birds (P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between PCR and AGID in detection of MDV in feather tips of clinically affected and dead birds (P > 0.05). Hence, PCR can be used to screen MDV in apparently healthy birds and AGID can be used to screen MDV in clinically affected and dead birds keeping feasibility and economic consideration. [Vet. World 2010; 3(5.000): 212-214] Marek’s disease Herpesvirus of turkey Polymerase chain reaction Agar gel immunodiffusion test Animal culture Veterinary medicine G. Selvaraju verfasserin aut K. Jayalakshmi verfasserin aut T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy verfasserin aut M. Geetha and S. Saravanan verfasserin aut In Veterinary World Veterinary World, 2011 3(2010), 5.000, Seite 212-214 (DE-627)582020751 (DE-600)2456277-4 22310916 nnns volume:3 year:2010 number:5.000 pages:212-214 https://doaj.org/article/55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b kostenfrei http://www.scopemed.org/mnstemps/2/2-1296640457.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0972-8988 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2010 5.000 212-214 |
allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ067331467 (DE-599)DOAJ55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF1-1100 SF600-1100 A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran verfasserin aut Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier A study was undertaken to identify Marek’s disease virus (MDV) antigen by PCR and AGID and to test the significance of PCR and AGID by McNemar’s test in detection of MDV antigen in outbreak in layer flocks. A total of twelve different MD outbreak flocks with varying flock size were selected in this study. Feather follicles were collected from 10 apparently healthy birds, 10 clinically affected birds and 10 dead birds separately in each outbreak. All the samples were subjected to PCR and AGID. In PCR, 42 (35.00%), 68 (56.67%) and 106 (88.33%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively and in AGID 28 (23.33%), 56 (46.67%) and 98 (81.67%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively. In testing the significance of PCR and AGID in detecting MDV, significant difference existed between the two tests in feather tips of apparently healthy birds (P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between PCR and AGID in detection of MDV in feather tips of clinically affected and dead birds (P > 0.05). Hence, PCR can be used to screen MDV in apparently healthy birds and AGID can be used to screen MDV in clinically affected and dead birds keeping feasibility and economic consideration. [Vet. World 2010; 3(5.000): 212-214] Marek’s disease Herpesvirus of turkey Polymerase chain reaction Agar gel immunodiffusion test Animal culture Veterinary medicine G. Selvaraju verfasserin aut K. Jayalakshmi verfasserin aut T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy verfasserin aut M. Geetha and S. Saravanan verfasserin aut In Veterinary World Veterinary World, 2011 3(2010), 5.000, Seite 212-214 (DE-627)582020751 (DE-600)2456277-4 22310916 nnns volume:3 year:2010 number:5.000 pages:212-214 https://doaj.org/article/55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b kostenfrei http://www.scopemed.org/mnstemps/2/2-1296640457.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0972-8988 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 3 2010 5.000 212-214 |
language |
English |
source |
In Veterinary World 3(2010), 5.000, Seite 212-214 volume:3 year:2010 number:5.000 pages:212-214 |
sourceStr |
In Veterinary World 3(2010), 5.000, Seite 212-214 volume:3 year:2010 number:5.000 pages:212-214 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
Marek’s disease Herpesvirus of turkey Polymerase chain reaction Agar gel immunodiffusion test Animal culture Veterinary medicine |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Veterinary World |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran @@aut@@ G. Selvaraju @@aut@@ K. Jayalakshmi @@aut@@ T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy @@aut@@ M. Geetha and S. Saravanan @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
582020751 |
id |
DOAJ067331467 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ067331467</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309070210.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ067331467</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SF1-1100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SF600-1100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A study was undertaken to identify Marek’s disease virus (MDV) antigen by PCR and AGID and to test the significance of PCR and AGID by McNemar’s test in detection of MDV antigen in outbreak in layer flocks. A total of twelve different MD outbreak flocks with varying flock size were selected in this study. Feather follicles were collected from 10 apparently healthy birds, 10 clinically affected birds and 10 dead birds separately in each outbreak. All the samples were subjected to PCR and AGID. In PCR, 42 (35.00%), 68 (56.67%) and 106 (88.33%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively and in AGID 28 (23.33%), 56 (46.67%) and 98 (81.67%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively. In testing the significance of PCR and AGID in detecting MDV, significant difference existed between the two tests in feather tips of apparently healthy birds (P &lt; 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between PCR and AGID in detection of MDV in feather tips of clinically affected and dead birds (P &gt; 0.05). Hence, PCR can be used to screen MDV in apparently healthy birds and AGID can be used to screen MDV in clinically affected and dead birds keeping feasibility and economic consideration. [Vet. World 2010; 3(5.000): 212-214]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Marek’s disease</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Herpesvirus of turkey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Polymerase chain reaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agar gel immunodiffusion test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Animal culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Veterinary medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">G. Selvaraju</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K. Jayalakshmi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M. Geetha and S. Saravanan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Veterinary World</subfield><subfield code="d">Veterinary World, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2010), 5.000, Seite 212-214</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)582020751</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2456277-4</subfield><subfield code="x">22310916</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5.000</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:212-214</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scopemed.org/mnstemps/2/2-1296640457.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0972-8988</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_252</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">5.000</subfield><subfield code="h">212-214</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
S - Agriculture |
author |
A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran |
spellingShingle |
A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran misc SF1-1100 misc SF600-1100 misc Marek’s disease misc Herpesvirus of turkey misc Polymerase chain reaction misc Agar gel immunodiffusion test misc Animal culture misc Veterinary medicine Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus |
authorStr |
A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)582020751 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
SF1-1100 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
22310916 |
topic_title |
SF1-1100 SF600-1100 Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus Marek’s disease Herpesvirus of turkey Polymerase chain reaction Agar gel immunodiffusion test |
topic |
misc SF1-1100 misc SF600-1100 misc Marek’s disease misc Herpesvirus of turkey misc Polymerase chain reaction misc Agar gel immunodiffusion test misc Animal culture misc Veterinary medicine |
topic_unstemmed |
misc SF1-1100 misc SF600-1100 misc Marek’s disease misc Herpesvirus of turkey misc Polymerase chain reaction misc Agar gel immunodiffusion test misc Animal culture misc Veterinary medicine |
topic_browse |
misc SF1-1100 misc SF600-1100 misc Marek’s disease misc Herpesvirus of turkey misc Polymerase chain reaction misc Agar gel immunodiffusion test misc Animal culture misc Veterinary medicine |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Veterinary World |
hierarchy_parent_id |
582020751 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Veterinary World |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)582020751 (DE-600)2456277-4 |
title |
Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ067331467 (DE-599)DOAJ55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b |
title_full |
Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus |
author_sort |
A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran |
journal |
Veterinary World |
journalStr |
Veterinary World |
callnumber-first-code |
S |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2010 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
212 |
author_browse |
A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran G. Selvaraju K. Jayalakshmi T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy M. Geetha and S. Saravanan |
container_volume |
3 |
class |
SF1-1100 SF600-1100 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran |
author2-role |
verfasserin |
title_sort |
comparision of polymerase chain reaction and agar gel immunodiffusion test in detection of marekand#8217;s disease virus |
callnumber |
SF1-1100 |
title_auth |
Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus |
abstract |
A study was undertaken to identify Marek’s disease virus (MDV) antigen by PCR and AGID and to test the significance of PCR and AGID by McNemar’s test in detection of MDV antigen in outbreak in layer flocks. A total of twelve different MD outbreak flocks with varying flock size were selected in this study. Feather follicles were collected from 10 apparently healthy birds, 10 clinically affected birds and 10 dead birds separately in each outbreak. All the samples were subjected to PCR and AGID. In PCR, 42 (35.00%), 68 (56.67%) and 106 (88.33%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively and in AGID 28 (23.33%), 56 (46.67%) and 98 (81.67%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively. In testing the significance of PCR and AGID in detecting MDV, significant difference existed between the two tests in feather tips of apparently healthy birds (P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between PCR and AGID in detection of MDV in feather tips of clinically affected and dead birds (P > 0.05). Hence, PCR can be used to screen MDV in apparently healthy birds and AGID can be used to screen MDV in clinically affected and dead birds keeping feasibility and economic consideration. [Vet. World 2010; 3(5.000): 212-214] |
abstractGer |
A study was undertaken to identify Marek’s disease virus (MDV) antigen by PCR and AGID and to test the significance of PCR and AGID by McNemar’s test in detection of MDV antigen in outbreak in layer flocks. A total of twelve different MD outbreak flocks with varying flock size were selected in this study. Feather follicles were collected from 10 apparently healthy birds, 10 clinically affected birds and 10 dead birds separately in each outbreak. All the samples were subjected to PCR and AGID. In PCR, 42 (35.00%), 68 (56.67%) and 106 (88.33%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively and in AGID 28 (23.33%), 56 (46.67%) and 98 (81.67%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively. In testing the significance of PCR and AGID in detecting MDV, significant difference existed between the two tests in feather tips of apparently healthy birds (P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between PCR and AGID in detection of MDV in feather tips of clinically affected and dead birds (P > 0.05). Hence, PCR can be used to screen MDV in apparently healthy birds and AGID can be used to screen MDV in clinically affected and dead birds keeping feasibility and economic consideration. [Vet. World 2010; 3(5.000): 212-214] |
abstract_unstemmed |
A study was undertaken to identify Marek’s disease virus (MDV) antigen by PCR and AGID and to test the significance of PCR and AGID by McNemar’s test in detection of MDV antigen in outbreak in layer flocks. A total of twelve different MD outbreak flocks with varying flock size were selected in this study. Feather follicles were collected from 10 apparently healthy birds, 10 clinically affected birds and 10 dead birds separately in each outbreak. All the samples were subjected to PCR and AGID. In PCR, 42 (35.00%), 68 (56.67%) and 106 (88.33%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively and in AGID 28 (23.33%), 56 (46.67%) and 98 (81.67%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively. In testing the significance of PCR and AGID in detecting MDV, significant difference existed between the two tests in feather tips of apparently healthy birds (P < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between PCR and AGID in detection of MDV in feather tips of clinically affected and dead birds (P > 0.05). Hence, PCR can be used to screen MDV in apparently healthy birds and AGID can be used to screen MDV in clinically affected and dead birds keeping feasibility and economic consideration. [Vet. World 2010; 3(5.000): 212-214] |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_252 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 |
container_issue |
5.000 |
title_short |
Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b http://www.scopemed.org/mnstemps/2/2-1296640457.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/0972-8988 |
remote_bool |
true |
author2 |
G. Selvaraju K. Jayalakshmi T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy M. Geetha and S. Saravanan |
author2Str |
G. Selvaraju K. Jayalakshmi T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy M. Geetha and S. Saravanan |
ppnlink |
582020751 |
callnumber-subject |
SF - Animal Culture |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
callnumber-a |
SF1-1100 |
up_date |
2024-07-04T00:28:38.639Z |
_version_ |
1803606209215856640 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ067331467</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309070210.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ067331467</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SF1-1100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SF600-1100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A. Manicavasaka Dinakaran</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparision of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Agar Gel Immunodiffusion test in Detection of MarekAND#8217;s Disease Virus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A study was undertaken to identify Marek’s disease virus (MDV) antigen by PCR and AGID and to test the significance of PCR and AGID by McNemar’s test in detection of MDV antigen in outbreak in layer flocks. A total of twelve different MD outbreak flocks with varying flock size were selected in this study. Feather follicles were collected from 10 apparently healthy birds, 10 clinically affected birds and 10 dead birds separately in each outbreak. All the samples were subjected to PCR and AGID. In PCR, 42 (35.00%), 68 (56.67%) and 106 (88.33%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively and in AGID 28 (23.33%), 56 (46.67%) and 98 (81.67%) samples were positive to MDV in apparently healthy birds, clinically affected birds and dead birds respectively. In testing the significance of PCR and AGID in detecting MDV, significant difference existed between the two tests in feather tips of apparently healthy birds (P &lt; 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between PCR and AGID in detection of MDV in feather tips of clinically affected and dead birds (P &gt; 0.05). Hence, PCR can be used to screen MDV in apparently healthy birds and AGID can be used to screen MDV in clinically affected and dead birds keeping feasibility and economic consideration. [Vet. World 2010; 3(5.000): 212-214]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Marek’s disease</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Herpesvirus of turkey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Polymerase chain reaction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agar gel immunodiffusion test</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Animal culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Veterinary medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">G. Selvaraju</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">K. Jayalakshmi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">T.R. Gopalakrishna Murthy</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">M. Geetha and S. Saravanan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Veterinary World</subfield><subfield code="d">Veterinary World, 2011</subfield><subfield code="g">3(2010), 5.000, Seite 212-214</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)582020751</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2456277-4</subfield><subfield code="x">22310916</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:3</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5.000</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:212-214</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/55d8bb49533f48489f1e81c4aadb443b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scopemed.org/mnstemps/2/2-1296640457.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0972-8988</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_252</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">3</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">5.000</subfield><subfield code="h">212-214</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.400757 |