Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice

Moral and political philosophers are increasingly using empirical data to inform their normative theories. This has sparked renewed interest into questions concerning the relationship between facts and principles. A recent attempt to frame these questions within a broader approach to normative theor...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Michael Buckley [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2012

Schlagwörter:	justice contextualism global distributive justice justification John Rawls David Miller

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Ethics & Global Politics - Taylor & Francis Group, 2008, 5(2012), 2, Seite 71-94
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:5 ; year:2012 ; number:2 ; pages:71-94

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ067858600

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ067858600
003	DE-627
005	20230502064517.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ067858600
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a JA1-92
050		0	\|a BJ1-1725
100	0		\|a Michael Buckley \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice
264		1	\|c 2012
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Moral and political philosophers are increasingly using empirical data to inform their normative theories. This has sparked renewed interest into questions concerning the relationship between facts and principles. A recent attempt to frame these questions within a broader approach to normative theory comes from David Miller, who has on several occasions defended ‘contextualism’ as the best approach to justice. Miller argues that the context of distribution itself brings one or another political principle into play. This paper examines this claim. It considers several plausible strategies for carrying out Miller's general project and argues that each strategy fails. Nevertheless, the author maintains that an investigation into why they fail paves the way for a philosophically plausible account of the relationship between facts and principles.
650		4	\|a justice
650		4	\|a contextualism
650		4	\|a global distributive justice
650		4	\|a justification
650		4	\|a John Rawls
650		4	\|a David Miller
653		0	\|a Political science (General)
653		0	\|a Ethics
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Ethics & Global Politics \|d Taylor & Francis Group, 2008 \|g 5(2012), 2, Seite 71-94 \|w (DE-627)571170293 \|w (DE-600)2434292-0 \|x 16546369 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:5 \|g year:2012 \|g number:2 \|g pages:71-94
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/8970/22289 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1654-4951 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1654-6369 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 5 \|j 2012 \|e 2 \|h 71-94

Indexfelder

author_variant	m b mb
matchkey_str	article:16546369:2012----::utcicnetsesncnetaimsn
hierarchy_sort_str	2012
callnumber-subject-code	JA
publishDate	2012
allfields	10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 doi (DE-627)DOAJ067858600 (DE-599)DOAJ66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng JA1-92 BJ1-1725 Michael Buckley verfasserin aut Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Moral and political philosophers are increasingly using empirical data to inform their normative theories. This has sparked renewed interest into questions concerning the relationship between facts and principles. A recent attempt to frame these questions within a broader approach to normative theory comes from David Miller, who has on several occasions defended ‘contextualism’ as the best approach to justice. Miller argues that the context of distribution itself brings one or another political principle into play. This paper examines this claim. It considers several plausible strategies for carrying out Miller's general project and argues that each strategy fails. Nevertheless, the author maintains that an investigation into why they fail paves the way for a philosophically plausible account of the relationship between facts and principles. justice contextualism global distributive justice justification John Rawls David Miller Political science (General) Ethics In Ethics & Global Politics Taylor & Francis Group, 2008 5(2012), 2, Seite 71-94 (DE-627)571170293 (DE-600)2434292-0 16546369 nnns volume:5 year:2012 number:2 pages:71-94 https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01 kostenfrei http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/8970/22289 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1654-4951 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1654-6369 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2012 2 71-94
spelling	10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 doi (DE-627)DOAJ067858600 (DE-599)DOAJ66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng JA1-92 BJ1-1725 Michael Buckley verfasserin aut Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Moral and political philosophers are increasingly using empirical data to inform their normative theories. This has sparked renewed interest into questions concerning the relationship between facts and principles. A recent attempt to frame these questions within a broader approach to normative theory comes from David Miller, who has on several occasions defended ‘contextualism’ as the best approach to justice. Miller argues that the context of distribution itself brings one or another political principle into play. This paper examines this claim. It considers several plausible strategies for carrying out Miller's general project and argues that each strategy fails. Nevertheless, the author maintains that an investigation into why they fail paves the way for a philosophically plausible account of the relationship between facts and principles. justice contextualism global distributive justice justification John Rawls David Miller Political science (General) Ethics In Ethics & Global Politics Taylor & Francis Group, 2008 5(2012), 2, Seite 71-94 (DE-627)571170293 (DE-600)2434292-0 16546369 nnns volume:5 year:2012 number:2 pages:71-94 https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01 kostenfrei http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/8970/22289 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1654-4951 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1654-6369 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2012 2 71-94
allfields_unstemmed	10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 doi (DE-627)DOAJ067858600 (DE-599)DOAJ66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng JA1-92 BJ1-1725 Michael Buckley verfasserin aut Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Moral and political philosophers are increasingly using empirical data to inform their normative theories. This has sparked renewed interest into questions concerning the relationship between facts and principles. A recent attempt to frame these questions within a broader approach to normative theory comes from David Miller, who has on several occasions defended ‘contextualism’ as the best approach to justice. Miller argues that the context of distribution itself brings one or another political principle into play. This paper examines this claim. It considers several plausible strategies for carrying out Miller's general project and argues that each strategy fails. Nevertheless, the author maintains that an investigation into why they fail paves the way for a philosophically plausible account of the relationship between facts and principles. justice contextualism global distributive justice justification John Rawls David Miller Political science (General) Ethics In Ethics & Global Politics Taylor & Francis Group, 2008 5(2012), 2, Seite 71-94 (DE-627)571170293 (DE-600)2434292-0 16546369 nnns volume:5 year:2012 number:2 pages:71-94 https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01 kostenfrei http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/8970/22289 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1654-4951 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1654-6369 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2012 2 71-94
allfieldsGer	10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 doi (DE-627)DOAJ067858600 (DE-599)DOAJ66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng JA1-92 BJ1-1725 Michael Buckley verfasserin aut Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Moral and political philosophers are increasingly using empirical data to inform their normative theories. This has sparked renewed interest into questions concerning the relationship between facts and principles. A recent attempt to frame these questions within a broader approach to normative theory comes from David Miller, who has on several occasions defended ‘contextualism’ as the best approach to justice. Miller argues that the context of distribution itself brings one or another political principle into play. This paper examines this claim. It considers several plausible strategies for carrying out Miller's general project and argues that each strategy fails. Nevertheless, the author maintains that an investigation into why they fail paves the way for a philosophically plausible account of the relationship between facts and principles. justice contextualism global distributive justice justification John Rawls David Miller Political science (General) Ethics In Ethics & Global Politics Taylor & Francis Group, 2008 5(2012), 2, Seite 71-94 (DE-627)571170293 (DE-600)2434292-0 16546369 nnns volume:5 year:2012 number:2 pages:71-94 https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01 kostenfrei http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/8970/22289 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1654-4951 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1654-6369 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2012 2 71-94
allfieldsSound	10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 doi (DE-627)DOAJ067858600 (DE-599)DOAJ66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng JA1-92 BJ1-1725 Michael Buckley verfasserin aut Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice 2012 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Moral and political philosophers are increasingly using empirical data to inform their normative theories. This has sparked renewed interest into questions concerning the relationship between facts and principles. A recent attempt to frame these questions within a broader approach to normative theory comes from David Miller, who has on several occasions defended ‘contextualism’ as the best approach to justice. Miller argues that the context of distribution itself brings one or another political principle into play. This paper examines this claim. It considers several plausible strategies for carrying out Miller's general project and argues that each strategy fails. Nevertheless, the author maintains that an investigation into why they fail paves the way for a philosophically plausible account of the relationship between facts and principles. justice contextualism global distributive justice justification John Rawls David Miller Political science (General) Ethics In Ethics & Global Politics Taylor & Francis Group, 2008 5(2012), 2, Seite 71-94 (DE-627)571170293 (DE-600)2434292-0 16546369 nnns volume:5 year:2012 number:2 pages:71-94 https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01 kostenfrei http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/8970/22289 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1654-4951 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1654-6369 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 5 2012 2 71-94
language	English
source	In Ethics & Global Politics 5(2012), 2, Seite 71-94 volume:5 year:2012 number:2 pages:71-94
sourceStr	In Ethics & Global Politics 5(2012), 2, Seite 71-94 volume:5 year:2012 number:2 pages:71-94
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	justice contextualism global distributive justice justification John Rawls David Miller Political science (General) Ethics
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Ethics & Global Politics
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Michael Buckley @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	571170293
id	DOAJ067858600
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ067858600</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502064517.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ067858600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JA1-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BJ1-1725</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michael Buckley</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moral and political philosophers are increasingly using empirical data to inform their normative theories. This has sparked renewed interest into questions concerning the relationship between facts and principles. A recent attempt to frame these questions within a broader approach to normative theory comes from David Miller, who has on several occasions defended ‘contextualism’ as the best approach to justice. Miller argues that the context of distribution itself brings one or another political principle into play. This paper examines this claim. It considers several plausible strategies for carrying out Miller's general project and argues that each strategy fails. Nevertheless, the author maintains that an investigation into why they fail paves the way for a philosophically plausible account of the relationship between facts and principles.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">contextualism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">global distributive justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">justification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">John Rawls</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">David Miller</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political science (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ethics & Global Politics</subfield><subfield code="d">Taylor & Francis Group, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2012), 2, Seite 71-94</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)571170293</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2434292-0</subfield><subfield code="x">16546369</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:71-94</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/8970/22289</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1654-4951</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1654-6369</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">71-94</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	J - Political Science
author	Michael Buckley
spellingShingle	Michael Buckley misc JA1-92 misc BJ1-1725 misc justice misc contextualism misc global distributive justice misc justification misc John Rawls misc David Miller misc Political science (General) misc Ethics Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice
authorStr	Michael Buckley
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)571170293
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	JA1-92
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	16546369
topic_title	JA1-92 BJ1-1725 Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice justice contextualism global distributive justice justification John Rawls David Miller
topic	misc JA1-92 misc BJ1-1725 misc justice misc contextualism misc global distributive justice misc justification misc John Rawls misc David Miller misc Political science (General) misc Ethics
topic_unstemmed	misc JA1-92 misc BJ1-1725 misc justice misc contextualism misc global distributive justice misc justification misc John Rawls misc David Miller misc Political science (General) misc Ethics
topic_browse	misc JA1-92 misc BJ1-1725 misc justice misc contextualism misc global distributive justice misc justification misc John Rawls misc David Miller misc Political science (General) misc Ethics
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Ethics & Global Politics
hierarchy_parent_id	571170293
hierarchy_top_title	Ethics & Global Politics
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)571170293 (DE-600)2434292-0
title	Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ067858600 (DE-599)DOAJ66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01
title_full	Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice
author_sort	Michael Buckley
journal	Ethics & Global Politics
journalStr	Ethics & Global Politics
callnumber-first-code	J
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2012
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	71
author_browse	Michael Buckley
container_volume	5
class	JA1-92 BJ1-1725
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Michael Buckley
doi_str_mv	10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970
title_sort	justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice
callnumber	JA1-92
title_auth	Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice
abstract	Moral and political philosophers are increasingly using empirical data to inform their normative theories. This has sparked renewed interest into questions concerning the relationship between facts and principles. A recent attempt to frame these questions within a broader approach to normative theory comes from David Miller, who has on several occasions defended ‘contextualism’ as the best approach to justice. Miller argues that the context of distribution itself brings one or another political principle into play. This paper examines this claim. It considers several plausible strategies for carrying out Miller's general project and argues that each strategy fails. Nevertheless, the author maintains that an investigation into why they fail paves the way for a philosophically plausible account of the relationship between facts and principles.
abstractGer	Moral and political philosophers are increasingly using empirical data to inform their normative theories. This has sparked renewed interest into questions concerning the relationship between facts and principles. A recent attempt to frame these questions within a broader approach to normative theory comes from David Miller, who has on several occasions defended ‘contextualism’ as the best approach to justice. Miller argues that the context of distribution itself brings one or another political principle into play. This paper examines this claim. It considers several plausible strategies for carrying out Miller's general project and argues that each strategy fails. Nevertheless, the author maintains that an investigation into why they fail paves the way for a philosophically plausible account of the relationship between facts and principles.
abstract_unstemmed	Moral and political philosophers are increasingly using empirical data to inform their normative theories. This has sparked renewed interest into questions concerning the relationship between facts and principles. A recent attempt to frame these questions within a broader approach to normative theory comes from David Miller, who has on several occasions defended ‘contextualism’ as the best approach to justice. Miller argues that the context of distribution itself brings one or another political principle into play. This paper examines this claim. It considers several plausible strategies for carrying out Miller's general project and argues that each strategy fails. Nevertheless, the author maintains that an investigation into why they fail paves the way for a philosophically plausible account of the relationship between facts and principles.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2010 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2
title_short	Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice
url	https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970 https://doaj.org/article/66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01 http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/8970/22289 https://doaj.org/toc/1654-4951 https://doaj.org/toc/1654-6369
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	571170293
callnumber-subject	JA - Political Science
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970
callnumber-a	JA1-92
up_date	2024-07-03T14:29:09.198Z
_version_	1803568492523290625
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ067858600</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502064517.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2012 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ067858600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JA1-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BJ1-1725</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Michael Buckley</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moral and political philosophers are increasingly using empirical data to inform their normative theories. This has sparked renewed interest into questions concerning the relationship between facts and principles. A recent attempt to frame these questions within a broader approach to normative theory comes from David Miller, who has on several occasions defended ‘contextualism’ as the best approach to justice. Miller argues that the context of distribution itself brings one or another political principle into play. This paper examines this claim. It considers several plausible strategies for carrying out Miller's general project and argues that each strategy fails. Nevertheless, the author maintains that an investigation into why they fail paves the way for a philosophically plausible account of the relationship between facts and principles.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">contextualism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">global distributive justice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">justification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">John Rawls</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">David Miller</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political science (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ethics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ethics & Global Politics</subfield><subfield code="d">Taylor & Francis Group, 2008</subfield><subfield code="g">5(2012), 2, Seite 71-94</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)571170293</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2434292-0</subfield><subfield code="x">16546369</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:5</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2012</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:71-94</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i2.8970</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/66d5a41ea73e4d3abbeb3a0f499d6d01</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.ethicsandglobalpolitics.net/index.php/egp/article/view/8970/22289</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1654-4951</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1654-6369</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">5</subfield><subfield code="j">2012</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">71-94</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.39818

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Justice in context: assessing contextualism as an approach to justice

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?