EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM

Objective: To compare mean pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM)-delivery time, hospital stay, frequency of caesarean section and fetal distress associated with immediate induction versus expectant management with delayed induction in women presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term....
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Sehrish Gul [verfasserIn] Mahwash Jamil [verfasserIn] Ayesha Basharat [verfasserIn] Muhammad Aleem Khan [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	expectant management feto-maternal outcomes labor induction pre-labour rupture of membranes

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal - Army Medical College Rawalpindi, 2016, 71(2021), 2, Seite 545-48
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:71 ; year:2021 ; number:2 ; pages:545-48

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ067868983

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ067868983
003	DE-627
005	20230309072653.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ067868983
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a R5-920
100	0		\|a Sehrish Gul \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Objective: To compare mean pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM)-delivery time, hospital stay, frequency of caesarean section and fetal distress associated with immediate induction versus expectant management with delayed induction in women presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynae/Obs. Unit of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from Sep 2013 to Mar 2014. Methodology: A total of 294 pregnant females with gestational age between 37-41 weeks with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes were enrolled and equally distributed to two groups. Group A females were immediately induced with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally and group B was managed expectantly for 12 hours followed by labor induction with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally if labor did not ensue spontaneously in 12 hours. Results: Mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery time was significantly shorter in immediate induction group when compared to the expectant group with delayed induction (6.93 ± 2.43 versus 19.25 ± 5.38 hours, p=0.001). Frequency of hospital stay of <3 days was also significantly lower in immediate induced group (29.9% n=44/147 versus 40.1% n=59/147, p=0.036). Higher percent-age of caesarean section (53.7% n=79/147 versus 44.9% n=66/147, p=0.129) and fetal distress (46.3% n=68/147 versus 38.8% n=57/147, p=0.129) were observed in immediate induction group. Conclusion: The mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery interval and hospital stay was significantly less in immediate induction when compared to expectant management with delayed induction group. Rates of caesarean sections and...................
650		4	\|a expectant management
650		4	\|a feto-maternal outcomes
650		4	\|a labor induction
650		4	\|a pre-labour rupture of membranes
653		0	\|a Medicine
653		0	\|a R
653		0	\|a Medicine (General)
700	0		\|a Mahwash Jamil \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Ayesha Basharat \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Muhammad Aleem Khan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal \|d Army Medical College Rawalpindi, 2016 \|g 71(2021), 2, Seite 545-48 \|w (DE-627)1016057962 \|x 24118842 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:71 \|g year:2021 \|g number:2 \|g pages:545-48
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6666 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 71 \|j 2021 \|e 2 \|h 545-48

Indexfelder

author_variant	s g sg m j mj a b ab m a k mak
matchkey_str	article:24118842:2021----::alpanditaetratmngpeaorpu
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
callnumber-subject-code	R
publishDate	2021
allfields	(DE-627)DOAJ067868983 (DE-599)DOAJ5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Sehrish Gul verfasserin aut EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective: To compare mean pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM)-delivery time, hospital stay, frequency of caesarean section and fetal distress associated with immediate induction versus expectant management with delayed induction in women presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynae/Obs. Unit of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from Sep 2013 to Mar 2014. Methodology: A total of 294 pregnant females with gestational age between 37-41 weeks with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes were enrolled and equally distributed to two groups. Group A females were immediately induced with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally and group B was managed expectantly for 12 hours followed by labor induction with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally if labor did not ensue spontaneously in 12 hours. Results: Mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery time was significantly shorter in immediate induction group when compared to the expectant group with delayed induction (6.93 ± 2.43 versus 19.25 ± 5.38 hours, p=0.001). Frequency of hospital stay of <3 days was also significantly lower in immediate induced group (29.9% n=44/147 versus 40.1% n=59/147, p=0.036). Higher percent-age of caesarean section (53.7% n=79/147 versus 44.9% n=66/147, p=0.129) and fetal distress (46.3% n=68/147 versus 38.8% n=57/147, p=0.129) were observed in immediate induction group. Conclusion: The mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery interval and hospital stay was significantly less in immediate induction when compared to expectant management with delayed induction group. Rates of caesarean sections and................... expectant management feto-maternal outcomes labor induction pre-labour rupture of membranes Medicine R Medicine (General) Mahwash Jamil verfasserin aut Ayesha Basharat verfasserin aut Muhammad Aleem Khan verfasserin aut In Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Army Medical College Rawalpindi, 2016 71(2021), 2, Seite 545-48 (DE-627)1016057962 24118842 nnns volume:71 year:2021 number:2 pages:545-48 https://doaj.org/article/5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42 kostenfrei https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6666 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 71 2021 2 545-48
spelling	(DE-627)DOAJ067868983 (DE-599)DOAJ5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Sehrish Gul verfasserin aut EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective: To compare mean pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM)-delivery time, hospital stay, frequency of caesarean section and fetal distress associated with immediate induction versus expectant management with delayed induction in women presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynae/Obs. Unit of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from Sep 2013 to Mar 2014. Methodology: A total of 294 pregnant females with gestational age between 37-41 weeks with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes were enrolled and equally distributed to two groups. Group A females were immediately induced with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally and group B was managed expectantly for 12 hours followed by labor induction with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally if labor did not ensue spontaneously in 12 hours. Results: Mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery time was significantly shorter in immediate induction group when compared to the expectant group with delayed induction (6.93 ± 2.43 versus 19.25 ± 5.38 hours, p=0.001). Frequency of hospital stay of <3 days was also significantly lower in immediate induced group (29.9% n=44/147 versus 40.1% n=59/147, p=0.036). Higher percent-age of caesarean section (53.7% n=79/147 versus 44.9% n=66/147, p=0.129) and fetal distress (46.3% n=68/147 versus 38.8% n=57/147, p=0.129) were observed in immediate induction group. Conclusion: The mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery interval and hospital stay was significantly less in immediate induction when compared to expectant management with delayed induction group. Rates of caesarean sections and................... expectant management feto-maternal outcomes labor induction pre-labour rupture of membranes Medicine R Medicine (General) Mahwash Jamil verfasserin aut Ayesha Basharat verfasserin aut Muhammad Aleem Khan verfasserin aut In Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Army Medical College Rawalpindi, 2016 71(2021), 2, Seite 545-48 (DE-627)1016057962 24118842 nnns volume:71 year:2021 number:2 pages:545-48 https://doaj.org/article/5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42 kostenfrei https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6666 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 71 2021 2 545-48
allfields_unstemmed	(DE-627)DOAJ067868983 (DE-599)DOAJ5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Sehrish Gul verfasserin aut EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective: To compare mean pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM)-delivery time, hospital stay, frequency of caesarean section and fetal distress associated with immediate induction versus expectant management with delayed induction in women presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynae/Obs. Unit of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from Sep 2013 to Mar 2014. Methodology: A total of 294 pregnant females with gestational age between 37-41 weeks with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes were enrolled and equally distributed to two groups. Group A females were immediately induced with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally and group B was managed expectantly for 12 hours followed by labor induction with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally if labor did not ensue spontaneously in 12 hours. Results: Mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery time was significantly shorter in immediate induction group when compared to the expectant group with delayed induction (6.93 ± 2.43 versus 19.25 ± 5.38 hours, p=0.001). Frequency of hospital stay of <3 days was also significantly lower in immediate induced group (29.9% n=44/147 versus 40.1% n=59/147, p=0.036). Higher percent-age of caesarean section (53.7% n=79/147 versus 44.9% n=66/147, p=0.129) and fetal distress (46.3% n=68/147 versus 38.8% n=57/147, p=0.129) were observed in immediate induction group. Conclusion: The mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery interval and hospital stay was significantly less in immediate induction when compared to expectant management with delayed induction group. Rates of caesarean sections and................... expectant management feto-maternal outcomes labor induction pre-labour rupture of membranes Medicine R Medicine (General) Mahwash Jamil verfasserin aut Ayesha Basharat verfasserin aut Muhammad Aleem Khan verfasserin aut In Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Army Medical College Rawalpindi, 2016 71(2021), 2, Seite 545-48 (DE-627)1016057962 24118842 nnns volume:71 year:2021 number:2 pages:545-48 https://doaj.org/article/5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42 kostenfrei https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6666 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 71 2021 2 545-48
allfieldsGer	(DE-627)DOAJ067868983 (DE-599)DOAJ5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Sehrish Gul verfasserin aut EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective: To compare mean pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM)-delivery time, hospital stay, frequency of caesarean section and fetal distress associated with immediate induction versus expectant management with delayed induction in women presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynae/Obs. Unit of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from Sep 2013 to Mar 2014. Methodology: A total of 294 pregnant females with gestational age between 37-41 weeks with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes were enrolled and equally distributed to two groups. Group A females were immediately induced with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally and group B was managed expectantly for 12 hours followed by labor induction with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally if labor did not ensue spontaneously in 12 hours. Results: Mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery time was significantly shorter in immediate induction group when compared to the expectant group with delayed induction (6.93 ± 2.43 versus 19.25 ± 5.38 hours, p=0.001). Frequency of hospital stay of <3 days was also significantly lower in immediate induced group (29.9% n=44/147 versus 40.1% n=59/147, p=0.036). Higher percent-age of caesarean section (53.7% n=79/147 versus 44.9% n=66/147, p=0.129) and fetal distress (46.3% n=68/147 versus 38.8% n=57/147, p=0.129) were observed in immediate induction group. Conclusion: The mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery interval and hospital stay was significantly less in immediate induction when compared to expectant management with delayed induction group. Rates of caesarean sections and................... expectant management feto-maternal outcomes labor induction pre-labour rupture of membranes Medicine R Medicine (General) Mahwash Jamil verfasserin aut Ayesha Basharat verfasserin aut Muhammad Aleem Khan verfasserin aut In Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Army Medical College Rawalpindi, 2016 71(2021), 2, Seite 545-48 (DE-627)1016057962 24118842 nnns volume:71 year:2021 number:2 pages:545-48 https://doaj.org/article/5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42 kostenfrei https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6666 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 71 2021 2 545-48
allfieldsSound	(DE-627)DOAJ067868983 (DE-599)DOAJ5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng R5-920 Sehrish Gul verfasserin aut EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Objective: To compare mean pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM)-delivery time, hospital stay, frequency of caesarean section and fetal distress associated with immediate induction versus expectant management with delayed induction in women presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynae/Obs. Unit of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from Sep 2013 to Mar 2014. Methodology: A total of 294 pregnant females with gestational age between 37-41 weeks with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes were enrolled and equally distributed to two groups. Group A females were immediately induced with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally and group B was managed expectantly for 12 hours followed by labor induction with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally if labor did not ensue spontaneously in 12 hours. Results: Mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery time was significantly shorter in immediate induction group when compared to the expectant group with delayed induction (6.93 ± 2.43 versus 19.25 ± 5.38 hours, p=0.001). Frequency of hospital stay of <3 days was also significantly lower in immediate induced group (29.9% n=44/147 versus 40.1% n=59/147, p=0.036). Higher percent-age of caesarean section (53.7% n=79/147 versus 44.9% n=66/147, p=0.129) and fetal distress (46.3% n=68/147 versus 38.8% n=57/147, p=0.129) were observed in immediate induction group. Conclusion: The mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery interval and hospital stay was significantly less in immediate induction when compared to expectant management with delayed induction group. Rates of caesarean sections and................... expectant management feto-maternal outcomes labor induction pre-labour rupture of membranes Medicine R Medicine (General) Mahwash Jamil verfasserin aut Ayesha Basharat verfasserin aut Muhammad Aleem Khan verfasserin aut In Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Army Medical College Rawalpindi, 2016 71(2021), 2, Seite 545-48 (DE-627)1016057962 24118842 nnns volume:71 year:2021 number:2 pages:545-48 https://doaj.org/article/5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42 kostenfrei https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6666 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 71 2021 2 545-48
language	English
source	In Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal 71(2021), 2, Seite 545-48 volume:71 year:2021 number:2 pages:545-48
sourceStr	In Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal 71(2021), 2, Seite 545-48 volume:71 year:2021 number:2 pages:545-48
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	expectant management feto-maternal outcomes labor induction pre-labour rupture of membranes Medicine R Medicine (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Sehrish Gul @@aut@@ Mahwash Jamil @@aut@@ Ayesha Basharat @@aut@@ Muhammad Aleem Khan @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	1016057962
id	DOAJ067868983
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ067868983</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309072653.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ067868983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sehrish Gul</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective: To compare mean pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM)-delivery time, hospital stay, frequency of caesarean section and fetal distress associated with immediate induction versus expectant management with delayed induction in women presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynae/Obs. Unit of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from Sep 2013 to Mar 2014. Methodology: A total of 294 pregnant females with gestational age between 37-41 weeks with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes were enrolled and equally distributed to two groups. Group A females were immediately induced with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally and group B was managed expectantly for 12 hours followed by labor induction with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally if labor did not ensue spontaneously in 12 hours. Results: Mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery time was significantly shorter in immediate induction group when compared to the expectant group with delayed induction (6.93 ± 2.43 versus 19.25 ± 5.38 hours, p=0.001). Frequency of hospital stay of <3 days was also significantly lower in immediate induced group (29.9% n=44/147 versus 40.1% n=59/147, p=0.036). Higher percent-age of caesarean section (53.7% n=79/147 versus 44.9% n=66/147, p=0.129) and fetal distress (46.3% n=68/147 versus 38.8% n=57/147, p=0.129) were observed in immediate induction group. Conclusion: The mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery interval and hospital stay was significantly less in immediate induction when compared to expectant management with delayed induction group. Rates of caesarean sections and...................</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">expectant management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">feto-maternal outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">labor induction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pre-labour rupture of membranes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahwash Jamil</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ayesha Basharat</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muhammad Aleem Khan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Army Medical College Rawalpindi, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">71(2021), 2, Seite 545-48</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1016057962</subfield><subfield code="x">24118842</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:71</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:545-48</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6666</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">71</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">545-48</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	R - Medicine
author	Sehrish Gul
spellingShingle	Sehrish Gul misc R5-920 misc expectant management misc feto-maternal outcomes misc labor induction misc pre-labour rupture of membranes misc Medicine misc R misc Medicine (General) EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM
authorStr	Sehrish Gul
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)1016057962
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	R5-920
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	24118842
topic_title	R5-920 EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM expectant management feto-maternal outcomes labor induction pre-labour rupture of membranes
topic	misc R5-920 misc expectant management misc feto-maternal outcomes misc labor induction misc pre-labour rupture of membranes misc Medicine misc R misc Medicine (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc R5-920 misc expectant management misc feto-maternal outcomes misc labor induction misc pre-labour rupture of membranes misc Medicine misc R misc Medicine (General)
topic_browse	misc R5-920 misc expectant management misc feto-maternal outcomes misc labor induction misc pre-labour rupture of membranes misc Medicine misc R misc Medicine (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
hierarchy_parent_id	1016057962
hierarchy_top_title	Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)1016057962
title	EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ067868983 (DE-599)DOAJ5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42
title_full	EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM
author_sort	Sehrish Gul
journal	Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
journalStr	Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
callnumber-first-code	R
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	545
author_browse	Sehrish Gul Mahwash Jamil Ayesha Basharat Muhammad Aleem Khan
container_volume	71
class	R5-920
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Sehrish Gul
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	early planned birth: a better way to manage pre-labor rupture of membranes at term
callnumber	R5-920
title_auth	EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM
abstract	Objective: To compare mean pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM)-delivery time, hospital stay, frequency of caesarean section and fetal distress associated with immediate induction versus expectant management with delayed induction in women presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynae/Obs. Unit of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from Sep 2013 to Mar 2014. Methodology: A total of 294 pregnant females with gestational age between 37-41 weeks with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes were enrolled and equally distributed to two groups. Group A females were immediately induced with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally and group B was managed expectantly for 12 hours followed by labor induction with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally if labor did not ensue spontaneously in 12 hours. Results: Mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery time was significantly shorter in immediate induction group when compared to the expectant group with delayed induction (6.93 ± 2.43 versus 19.25 ± 5.38 hours, p=0.001). Frequency of hospital stay of <3 days was also significantly lower in immediate induced group (29.9% n=44/147 versus 40.1% n=59/147, p=0.036). Higher percent-age of caesarean section (53.7% n=79/147 versus 44.9% n=66/147, p=0.129) and fetal distress (46.3% n=68/147 versus 38.8% n=57/147, p=0.129) were observed in immediate induction group. Conclusion: The mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery interval and hospital stay was significantly less in immediate induction when compared to expectant management with delayed induction group. Rates of caesarean sections and...................
abstractGer	Objective: To compare mean pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM)-delivery time, hospital stay, frequency of caesarean section and fetal distress associated with immediate induction versus expectant management with delayed induction in women presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynae/Obs. Unit of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from Sep 2013 to Mar 2014. Methodology: A total of 294 pregnant females with gestational age between 37-41 weeks with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes were enrolled and equally distributed to two groups. Group A females were immediately induced with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally and group B was managed expectantly for 12 hours followed by labor induction with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally if labor did not ensue spontaneously in 12 hours. Results: Mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery time was significantly shorter in immediate induction group when compared to the expectant group with delayed induction (6.93 ± 2.43 versus 19.25 ± 5.38 hours, p=0.001). Frequency of hospital stay of <3 days was also significantly lower in immediate induced group (29.9% n=44/147 versus 40.1% n=59/147, p=0.036). Higher percent-age of caesarean section (53.7% n=79/147 versus 44.9% n=66/147, p=0.129) and fetal distress (46.3% n=68/147 versus 38.8% n=57/147, p=0.129) were observed in immediate induction group. Conclusion: The mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery interval and hospital stay was significantly less in immediate induction when compared to expectant management with delayed induction group. Rates of caesarean sections and...................
abstract_unstemmed	Objective: To compare mean pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM)-delivery time, hospital stay, frequency of caesarean section and fetal distress associated with immediate induction versus expectant management with delayed induction in women presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynae/Obs. Unit of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from Sep 2013 to Mar 2014. Methodology: A total of 294 pregnant females with gestational age between 37-41 weeks with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes were enrolled and equally distributed to two groups. Group A females were immediately induced with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally and group B was managed expectantly for 12 hours followed by labor induction with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally if labor did not ensue spontaneously in 12 hours. Results: Mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery time was significantly shorter in immediate induction group when compared to the expectant group with delayed induction (6.93 ± 2.43 versus 19.25 ± 5.38 hours, p=0.001). Frequency of hospital stay of <3 days was also significantly lower in immediate induced group (29.9% n=44/147 versus 40.1% n=59/147, p=0.036). Higher percent-age of caesarean section (53.7% n=79/147 versus 44.9% n=66/147, p=0.129) and fetal distress (46.3% n=68/147 versus 38.8% n=57/147, p=0.129) were observed in immediate induction group. Conclusion: The mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery interval and hospital stay was significantly less in immediate induction when compared to expectant management with delayed induction group. Rates of caesarean sections and...................
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2003 GBV_ILN_2005 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2011 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2111 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	2
title_short	EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM
url	https://doaj.org/article/5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42 https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6666 https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648 https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842
remote_bool	true
author2	Mahwash Jamil Ayesha Basharat Muhammad Aleem Khan
author2Str	Mahwash Jamil Ayesha Basharat Muhammad Aleem Khan
ppnlink	1016057962
callnumber-subject	R - General Medicine
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
callnumber-a	R5-920
up_date	2024-07-03T14:32:52.822Z
_version_	1803568727012147200
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ067868983</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309072653.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ067868983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R5-920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sehrish Gul</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Objective: To compare mean pre-labour rupture of membranes (PROM)-delivery time, hospital stay, frequency of caesarean section and fetal distress associated with immediate induction versus expectant management with delayed induction in women presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes at term. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of Study: Gynae/Obs. Unit of Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from Sep 2013 to Mar 2014. Methodology: A total of 294 pregnant females with gestational age between 37-41 weeks with singleton pregnancies and cephalic presentation presenting with pre-labour rupture of membranes were enrolled and equally distributed to two groups. Group A females were immediately induced with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally and group B was managed expectantly for 12 hours followed by labor induction with 50 micrograms of misoprostol per vaginally if labor did not ensue spontaneously in 12 hours. Results: Mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery time was significantly shorter in immediate induction group when compared to the expectant group with delayed induction (6.93 ± 2.43 versus 19.25 ± 5.38 hours, p=0.001). Frequency of hospital stay of <3 days was also significantly lower in immediate induced group (29.9% n=44/147 versus 40.1% n=59/147, p=0.036). Higher percent-age of caesarean section (53.7% n=79/147 versus 44.9% n=66/147, p=0.129) and fetal distress (46.3% n=68/147 versus 38.8% n=57/147, p=0.129) were observed in immediate induction group. Conclusion: The mean pre-labour rupture of membranes to delivery interval and hospital stay was significantly less in immediate induction when compared to expectant management with delayed induction group. Rates of caesarean sections and...................</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">expectant management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">feto-maternal outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">labor induction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">pre-labour rupture of membranes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mahwash Jamil</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ayesha Basharat</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Muhammad Aleem Khan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal</subfield><subfield code="d">Army Medical College Rawalpindi, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">71(2021), 2, Seite 545-48</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1016057962</subfield><subfield code="x">24118842</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:71</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:545-48</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/5dfb58f9181e49f4b05470e5bac71a42</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6666</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2003</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">71</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">545-48</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4002314

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

EARLY PLANNED BIRTH: A BETTER WAY TO MANAGE PRE-LABOR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?