A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry

The Trump Administration declared China a strategic competitor and a revisionist power. It escalated a trade war to a fullfrontal clash with China. Some experts qualified it as a new Cold War between the US and China. Both countries are undergoing dramatic transformation. Their destinations will det...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Zhao Suisheng [verfasserIn] Dan Guo [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Russisch

Erschienen:	2019

Schlagwörter:	US China relations trade war reciprocity international order competition engagement interdependence

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Vestnik RUDN. International Relations - Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 2017, 19(2019), 1, Seite 9-21
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:19 ; year:2019 ; number:1 ; pages:9-21

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ068413483

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ068413483
003	DE-627
005	20230310202054.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ068413483
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a rus
050		0	\|a JZ2-6530
050		0	\|a JA1-92
100	0		\|a Zhao Suisheng \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	2	\|a A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The Trump Administration declared China a strategic competitor and a revisionist power. It escalated a trade war to a fullfrontal clash with China. Some experts qualified it as a new Cold War between the US and China. Both countries are undergoing dramatic transformation. Their destinations will determine the course and outcome of the emerging US-China rivalry. This article argues that while engagement is now defined by competitive interests, the profound interdependence continues underpinning the bilateral relationship. Although there is no precedent to guide economic and geostrategic competition between the two largest and deeply intertwined economies and heavily militarized superpowers, the US and China must find some balance of interests with each other and avoid violent confrontation that serves neither’s interest. This level of engagement requires vision and flexibility. With strong economic interdependence, the existence of an international institutional order, limited ideological confrontation, and nuclear second-strike capability, leaders of two countries have no choice but find ways to manage their competition and continue futher engagement with each other. Authors conclude that the stronger China grows, the harder it gets for Washington to force it back down. Driving PRC into a corner is the way to make China even tougher. So it could cause more severe consequences for both countries.
650		4	\|a US
650		4	\|a China relations
650		4	\|a trade war
650		4	\|a reciprocity
650		4	\|a international order
650		4	\|a competition
650		4	\|a engagement
650		4	\|a interdependence
653		0	\|a International relations
653		0	\|a Political science (General)
700	0		\|a Dan Guo \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Vestnik RUDN. International Relations \|d Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 2017 \|g 19(2019), 1, Seite 9-21 \|w (DE-627)866913076 \|w (DE-600)2867253-7 \|x 23130679 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:19 \|g year:2019 \|g number:1 \|g pages:9-21
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/viewFile/20848/16812 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0660 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0679 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4326
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 19 \|j 2019 \|e 1 \|h 9-21

Indexfelder

author_variant	z s zs d g dg
matchkey_str	article:23130679:2019----::nwodacueaduuefheegn
hierarchy_sort_str	2019
callnumber-subject-code	JZ
publishDate	2019
allfields	10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 doi (DE-627)DOAJ068413483 (DE-599)DOAJ2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JZ2-6530 JA1-92 Zhao Suisheng verfasserin aut A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The Trump Administration declared China a strategic competitor and a revisionist power. It escalated a trade war to a fullfrontal clash with China. Some experts qualified it as a new Cold War between the US and China. Both countries are undergoing dramatic transformation. Their destinations will determine the course and outcome of the emerging US-China rivalry. This article argues that while engagement is now defined by competitive interests, the profound interdependence continues underpinning the bilateral relationship. Although there is no precedent to guide economic and geostrategic competition between the two largest and deeply intertwined economies and heavily militarized superpowers, the US and China must find some balance of interests with each other and avoid violent confrontation that serves neither’s interest. This level of engagement requires vision and flexibility. With strong economic interdependence, the existence of an international institutional order, limited ideological confrontation, and nuclear second-strike capability, leaders of two countries have no choice but find ways to manage their competition and continue futher engagement with each other. Authors conclude that the stronger China grows, the harder it gets for Washington to force it back down. Driving PRC into a corner is the way to make China even tougher. So it could cause more severe consequences for both countries. US China relations trade war reciprocity international order competition engagement interdependence International relations Political science (General) Dan Guo verfasserin aut In Vestnik RUDN. International Relations Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 2017 19(2019), 1, Seite 9-21 (DE-627)866913076 (DE-600)2867253-7 23130679 nnns volume:19 year:2019 number:1 pages:9-21 https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0 kostenfrei http://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/viewFile/20848/16812 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0660 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0679 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2019 1 9-21
spelling	10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 doi (DE-627)DOAJ068413483 (DE-599)DOAJ2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JZ2-6530 JA1-92 Zhao Suisheng verfasserin aut A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The Trump Administration declared China a strategic competitor and a revisionist power. It escalated a trade war to a fullfrontal clash with China. Some experts qualified it as a new Cold War between the US and China. Both countries are undergoing dramatic transformation. Their destinations will determine the course and outcome of the emerging US-China rivalry. This article argues that while engagement is now defined by competitive interests, the profound interdependence continues underpinning the bilateral relationship. Although there is no precedent to guide economic and geostrategic competition between the two largest and deeply intertwined economies and heavily militarized superpowers, the US and China must find some balance of interests with each other and avoid violent confrontation that serves neither’s interest. This level of engagement requires vision and flexibility. With strong economic interdependence, the existence of an international institutional order, limited ideological confrontation, and nuclear second-strike capability, leaders of two countries have no choice but find ways to manage their competition and continue futher engagement with each other. Authors conclude that the stronger China grows, the harder it gets for Washington to force it back down. Driving PRC into a corner is the way to make China even tougher. So it could cause more severe consequences for both countries. US China relations trade war reciprocity international order competition engagement interdependence International relations Political science (General) Dan Guo verfasserin aut In Vestnik RUDN. International Relations Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 2017 19(2019), 1, Seite 9-21 (DE-627)866913076 (DE-600)2867253-7 23130679 nnns volume:19 year:2019 number:1 pages:9-21 https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0 kostenfrei http://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/viewFile/20848/16812 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0660 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0679 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2019 1 9-21
allfields_unstemmed	10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 doi (DE-627)DOAJ068413483 (DE-599)DOAJ2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JZ2-6530 JA1-92 Zhao Suisheng verfasserin aut A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The Trump Administration declared China a strategic competitor and a revisionist power. It escalated a trade war to a fullfrontal clash with China. Some experts qualified it as a new Cold War between the US and China. Both countries are undergoing dramatic transformation. Their destinations will determine the course and outcome of the emerging US-China rivalry. This article argues that while engagement is now defined by competitive interests, the profound interdependence continues underpinning the bilateral relationship. Although there is no precedent to guide economic and geostrategic competition between the two largest and deeply intertwined economies and heavily militarized superpowers, the US and China must find some balance of interests with each other and avoid violent confrontation that serves neither’s interest. This level of engagement requires vision and flexibility. With strong economic interdependence, the existence of an international institutional order, limited ideological confrontation, and nuclear second-strike capability, leaders of two countries have no choice but find ways to manage their competition and continue futher engagement with each other. Authors conclude that the stronger China grows, the harder it gets for Washington to force it back down. Driving PRC into a corner is the way to make China even tougher. So it could cause more severe consequences for both countries. US China relations trade war reciprocity international order competition engagement interdependence International relations Political science (General) Dan Guo verfasserin aut In Vestnik RUDN. International Relations Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 2017 19(2019), 1, Seite 9-21 (DE-627)866913076 (DE-600)2867253-7 23130679 nnns volume:19 year:2019 number:1 pages:9-21 https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0 kostenfrei http://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/viewFile/20848/16812 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0660 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0679 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2019 1 9-21
allfieldsGer	10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 doi (DE-627)DOAJ068413483 (DE-599)DOAJ2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JZ2-6530 JA1-92 Zhao Suisheng verfasserin aut A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The Trump Administration declared China a strategic competitor and a revisionist power. It escalated a trade war to a fullfrontal clash with China. Some experts qualified it as a new Cold War between the US and China. Both countries are undergoing dramatic transformation. Their destinations will determine the course and outcome of the emerging US-China rivalry. This article argues that while engagement is now defined by competitive interests, the profound interdependence continues underpinning the bilateral relationship. Although there is no precedent to guide economic and geostrategic competition between the two largest and deeply intertwined economies and heavily militarized superpowers, the US and China must find some balance of interests with each other and avoid violent confrontation that serves neither’s interest. This level of engagement requires vision and flexibility. With strong economic interdependence, the existence of an international institutional order, limited ideological confrontation, and nuclear second-strike capability, leaders of two countries have no choice but find ways to manage their competition and continue futher engagement with each other. Authors conclude that the stronger China grows, the harder it gets for Washington to force it back down. Driving PRC into a corner is the way to make China even tougher. So it could cause more severe consequences for both countries. US China relations trade war reciprocity international order competition engagement interdependence International relations Political science (General) Dan Guo verfasserin aut In Vestnik RUDN. International Relations Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 2017 19(2019), 1, Seite 9-21 (DE-627)866913076 (DE-600)2867253-7 23130679 nnns volume:19 year:2019 number:1 pages:9-21 https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0 kostenfrei http://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/viewFile/20848/16812 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0660 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0679 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2019 1 9-21
allfieldsSound	10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 doi (DE-627)DOAJ068413483 (DE-599)DOAJ2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus JZ2-6530 JA1-92 Zhao Suisheng verfasserin aut A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The Trump Administration declared China a strategic competitor and a revisionist power. It escalated a trade war to a fullfrontal clash with China. Some experts qualified it as a new Cold War between the US and China. Both countries are undergoing dramatic transformation. Their destinations will determine the course and outcome of the emerging US-China rivalry. This article argues that while engagement is now defined by competitive interests, the profound interdependence continues underpinning the bilateral relationship. Although there is no precedent to guide economic and geostrategic competition between the two largest and deeply intertwined economies and heavily militarized superpowers, the US and China must find some balance of interests with each other and avoid violent confrontation that serves neither’s interest. This level of engagement requires vision and flexibility. With strong economic interdependence, the existence of an international institutional order, limited ideological confrontation, and nuclear second-strike capability, leaders of two countries have no choice but find ways to manage their competition and continue futher engagement with each other. Authors conclude that the stronger China grows, the harder it gets for Washington to force it back down. Driving PRC into a corner is the way to make China even tougher. So it could cause more severe consequences for both countries. US China relations trade war reciprocity international order competition engagement interdependence International relations Political science (General) Dan Guo verfasserin aut In Vestnik RUDN. International Relations Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 2017 19(2019), 1, Seite 9-21 (DE-627)866913076 (DE-600)2867253-7 23130679 nnns volume:19 year:2019 number:1 pages:9-21 https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0 kostenfrei http://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/viewFile/20848/16812 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0660 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0679 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 19 2019 1 9-21
language	English Russian
source	In Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 19(2019), 1, Seite 9-21 volume:19 year:2019 number:1 pages:9-21
sourceStr	In Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 19(2019), 1, Seite 9-21 volume:19 year:2019 number:1 pages:9-21
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	US China relations trade war reciprocity international order competition engagement interdependence International relations Political science (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Vestnik RUDN. International Relations
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Zhao Suisheng @@aut@@ Dan Guo @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2019-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	866913076
id	DOAJ068413483
language_de	englisch russisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ068413483</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310202054.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ068413483</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JZ2-6530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JA1-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao Suisheng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Trump Administration declared China a strategic competitor and a revisionist power. It escalated a trade war to a fullfrontal clash with China. Some experts qualified it as a new Cold War between the US and China. Both countries are undergoing dramatic transformation. Their destinations will determine the course and outcome of the emerging US-China rivalry. This article argues that while engagement is now defined by competitive interests, the profound interdependence continues underpinning the bilateral relationship. Although there is no precedent to guide economic and geostrategic competition between the two largest and deeply intertwined economies and heavily militarized superpowers, the US and China must find some balance of interests with each other and avoid violent confrontation that serves neither’s interest. This level of engagement requires vision and flexibility. With strong economic interdependence, the existence of an international institutional order, limited ideological confrontation, and nuclear second-strike capability, leaders of two countries have no choice but find ways to manage their competition and continue futher engagement with each other. Authors conclude that the stronger China grows, the harder it gets for Washington to force it back down. Driving PRC into a corner is the way to make China even tougher. So it could cause more severe consequences for both countries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">China relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">trade war</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reciprocity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">international order</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">competition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">engagement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">interdependence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political science (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dan Guo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Vestnik RUDN. International Relations</subfield><subfield code="d">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2019), 1, Seite 9-21</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)866913076</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2867253-7</subfield><subfield code="x">23130679</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:9-21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/viewFile/20848/16812</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0660</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0679</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">9-21</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	J - Political Science
author	Zhao Suisheng
spellingShingle	Zhao Suisheng misc JZ2-6530 misc JA1-92 misc US misc China relations misc trade war misc reciprocity misc international order misc competition misc engagement misc interdependence misc International relations misc Political science (General) A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry
authorStr	Zhao Suisheng
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)866913076
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	JZ2-6530
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	23130679
topic_title	JZ2-6530 JA1-92 A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry US China relations trade war reciprocity international order competition engagement interdependence
topic	misc JZ2-6530 misc JA1-92 misc US misc China relations misc trade war misc reciprocity misc international order misc competition misc engagement misc interdependence misc International relations misc Political science (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc JZ2-6530 misc JA1-92 misc US misc China relations misc trade war misc reciprocity misc international order misc competition misc engagement misc interdependence misc International relations misc Political science (General)
topic_browse	misc JZ2-6530 misc JA1-92 misc US misc China relations misc trade war misc reciprocity misc international order misc competition misc engagement misc interdependence misc International relations misc Political science (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Vestnik RUDN. International Relations
hierarchy_parent_id	866913076
hierarchy_top_title	Vestnik RUDN. International Relations
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)866913076 (DE-600)2867253-7
title	A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ068413483 (DE-599)DOAJ2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0
title_full	A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry
author_sort	Zhao Suisheng
journal	Vestnik RUDN. International Relations
journalStr	Vestnik RUDN. International Relations
callnumber-first-code	J
lang_code	eng rus
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2019
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	9
author_browse	Zhao Suisheng Dan Guo
container_volume	19
class	JZ2-6530 JA1-92
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Zhao Suisheng
doi_str_mv	10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	new cold war? causes and future of the emerging us-china rivalry
callnumber	JZ2-6530
title_auth	A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry
abstract	The Trump Administration declared China a strategic competitor and a revisionist power. It escalated a trade war to a fullfrontal clash with China. Some experts qualified it as a new Cold War between the US and China. Both countries are undergoing dramatic transformation. Their destinations will determine the course and outcome of the emerging US-China rivalry. This article argues that while engagement is now defined by competitive interests, the profound interdependence continues underpinning the bilateral relationship. Although there is no precedent to guide economic and geostrategic competition between the two largest and deeply intertwined economies and heavily militarized superpowers, the US and China must find some balance of interests with each other and avoid violent confrontation that serves neither’s interest. This level of engagement requires vision and flexibility. With strong economic interdependence, the existence of an international institutional order, limited ideological confrontation, and nuclear second-strike capability, leaders of two countries have no choice but find ways to manage their competition and continue futher engagement with each other. Authors conclude that the stronger China grows, the harder it gets for Washington to force it back down. Driving PRC into a corner is the way to make China even tougher. So it could cause more severe consequences for both countries.
abstractGer	The Trump Administration declared China a strategic competitor and a revisionist power. It escalated a trade war to a fullfrontal clash with China. Some experts qualified it as a new Cold War between the US and China. Both countries are undergoing dramatic transformation. Their destinations will determine the course and outcome of the emerging US-China rivalry. This article argues that while engagement is now defined by competitive interests, the profound interdependence continues underpinning the bilateral relationship. Although there is no precedent to guide economic and geostrategic competition between the two largest and deeply intertwined economies and heavily militarized superpowers, the US and China must find some balance of interests with each other and avoid violent confrontation that serves neither’s interest. This level of engagement requires vision and flexibility. With strong economic interdependence, the existence of an international institutional order, limited ideological confrontation, and nuclear second-strike capability, leaders of two countries have no choice but find ways to manage their competition and continue futher engagement with each other. Authors conclude that the stronger China grows, the harder it gets for Washington to force it back down. Driving PRC into a corner is the way to make China even tougher. So it could cause more severe consequences for both countries.
abstract_unstemmed	The Trump Administration declared China a strategic competitor and a revisionist power. It escalated a trade war to a fullfrontal clash with China. Some experts qualified it as a new Cold War between the US and China. Both countries are undergoing dramatic transformation. Their destinations will determine the course and outcome of the emerging US-China rivalry. This article argues that while engagement is now defined by competitive interests, the profound interdependence continues underpinning the bilateral relationship. Although there is no precedent to guide economic and geostrategic competition between the two largest and deeply intertwined economies and heavily militarized superpowers, the US and China must find some balance of interests with each other and avoid violent confrontation that serves neither’s interest. This level of engagement requires vision and flexibility. With strong economic interdependence, the existence of an international institutional order, limited ideological confrontation, and nuclear second-strike capability, leaders of two countries have no choice but find ways to manage their competition and continue futher engagement with each other. Authors conclude that the stronger China grows, the harder it gets for Washington to force it back down. Driving PRC into a corner is the way to make China even tougher. So it could cause more severe consequences for both countries.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4326 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	1
title_short	A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry
url	https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21 https://doaj.org/article/2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0 http://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/viewFile/20848/16812 https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0660 https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0679
remote_bool	true
author2	Dan Guo
author2Str	Dan Guo
ppnlink	866913076
callnumber-subject	JZ - International Relations
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21
callnumber-a	JZ2-6530
up_date	2024-07-03T17:38:52.835Z
_version_	1803580429139181568
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ068413483</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230310202054.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ068413483</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JZ2-6530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">JA1-92</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zhao Suisheng</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Trump Administration declared China a strategic competitor and a revisionist power. It escalated a trade war to a fullfrontal clash with China. Some experts qualified it as a new Cold War between the US and China. Both countries are undergoing dramatic transformation. Their destinations will determine the course and outcome of the emerging US-China rivalry. This article argues that while engagement is now defined by competitive interests, the profound interdependence continues underpinning the bilateral relationship. Although there is no precedent to guide economic and geostrategic competition between the two largest and deeply intertwined economies and heavily militarized superpowers, the US and China must find some balance of interests with each other and avoid violent confrontation that serves neither’s interest. This level of engagement requires vision and flexibility. With strong economic interdependence, the existence of an international institutional order, limited ideological confrontation, and nuclear second-strike capability, leaders of two countries have no choice but find ways to manage their competition and continue futher engagement with each other. Authors conclude that the stronger China grows, the harder it gets for Washington to force it back down. Driving PRC into a corner is the way to make China even tougher. So it could cause more severe consequences for both countries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">China relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">trade war</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reciprocity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">international order</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">competition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">engagement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">interdependence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Political science (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dan Guo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Vestnik RUDN. International Relations</subfield><subfield code="d">Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2019), 1, Seite 9-21</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)866913076</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2867253-7</subfield><subfield code="x">23130679</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:9-21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-9-21</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/2cc2a476a8174592884c22e1796b21f0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://journals.rudn.ru/international-relations/article/viewFile/20848/16812</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0660</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2313-0679</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">9-21</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.401038

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

A New Cold War? Causes and Future of the Emerging US-China Rivalry

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?