Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice

As a quality improvement tool, clinical audit has been extensively described in the medical literature. There is scant literature on the use of clinical audit in the farm animal veterinary setting. This study describes the process and feasibility of prospective and retrospective data collection for...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Katie Waine [verfasserIn] Constance White [verfasserIn] Rachel S. Dean [verfasserIn] Chris Hudson [verfasserIn] Jonathan N. Huxley [verfasserIn] Marnie L. Brennan [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	clinical audit farm animal practice farm animal veterinary medicine quality improvement retrospective clinical audit prospective clinical audit

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Veterinary Sciences - MDPI AG, 2014, 8(2021), 4, p 62
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:8 ; year:2021 ; number:4, p 62

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/vetsci8040062

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ069371105

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ069371105
003	DE-627
005	20240412184306.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/vetsci8040062 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ069371105
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a SF600-1100
100	0		\|a Katie Waine \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a As a quality improvement tool, clinical audit has been extensively described in the medical literature. There is scant literature on the use of clinical audit in the farm animal veterinary setting. This study describes the process and feasibility of prospective and retrospective data collection for farm animal clinical audit performed at three different farm animal practices in the United Kingdom. Retrospective clinical audit was difficult in all three practices due to barriers in establishing diagnosis and patient identity from clinical records. Prospective data collection proved feasible but depended on adequate case accrual and practitioner engagement. The decision to conduct clinical audit retrospectively or prospectively will depend on the topic to audit, the availability of data and the wishes of the team members involved. Further work is required looking at the use of clinical coding and alternatives to using practice management software to improve retrospective data availability for clinical audit.
650		4	\|a clinical audit
650		4	\|a farm animal practice
650		4	\|a farm animal veterinary medicine
650		4	\|a quality improvement
650		4	\|a retrospective clinical audit
650		4	\|a prospective clinical audit
653		0	\|a Veterinary medicine
700	0		\|a Constance White \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Rachel S. Dean \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Chris Hudson \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Jonathan N. Huxley \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Marnie L. Brennan \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Veterinary Sciences \|d MDPI AG, 2014 \|g 8(2021), 4, p 62 \|w (DE-627)785698477 \|w (DE-600)2768971-2 \|x 23067381 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:8 \|g year:2021 \|g number:4, p 62
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8040062 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/4/62 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2306-7381 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2446
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 8 \|j 2021 \|e 4, p 62

Indexfelder

author_variant	k w kw c w cw r s d rsd c h ch j n h jnh m l b mlb
matchkey_str	article:23067381:2021----::sesnteesbltortopcienpopcielncluiif
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
callnumber-subject-code	SF
publishDate	2021
allfields	10.3390/vetsci8040062 doi (DE-627)DOAJ069371105 (DE-599)DOAJ5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF600-1100 Katie Waine verfasserin aut Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier As a quality improvement tool, clinical audit has been extensively described in the medical literature. There is scant literature on the use of clinical audit in the farm animal veterinary setting. This study describes the process and feasibility of prospective and retrospective data collection for farm animal clinical audit performed at three different farm animal practices in the United Kingdom. Retrospective clinical audit was difficult in all three practices due to barriers in establishing diagnosis and patient identity from clinical records. Prospective data collection proved feasible but depended on adequate case accrual and practitioner engagement. The decision to conduct clinical audit retrospectively or prospectively will depend on the topic to audit, the availability of data and the wishes of the team members involved. Further work is required looking at the use of clinical coding and alternatives to using practice management software to improve retrospective data availability for clinical audit. clinical audit farm animal practice farm animal veterinary medicine quality improvement retrospective clinical audit prospective clinical audit Veterinary medicine Constance White verfasserin aut Rachel S. Dean verfasserin aut Chris Hudson verfasserin aut Jonathan N. Huxley verfasserin aut Marnie L. Brennan verfasserin aut In Veterinary Sciences MDPI AG, 2014 8(2021), 4, p 62 (DE-627)785698477 (DE-600)2768971-2 23067381 nnns volume:8 year:2021 number:4, p 62 https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8040062 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/4/62 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2306-7381 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2021 4, p 62
spelling	10.3390/vetsci8040062 doi (DE-627)DOAJ069371105 (DE-599)DOAJ5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF600-1100 Katie Waine verfasserin aut Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier As a quality improvement tool, clinical audit has been extensively described in the medical literature. There is scant literature on the use of clinical audit in the farm animal veterinary setting. This study describes the process and feasibility of prospective and retrospective data collection for farm animal clinical audit performed at three different farm animal practices in the United Kingdom. Retrospective clinical audit was difficult in all three practices due to barriers in establishing diagnosis and patient identity from clinical records. Prospective data collection proved feasible but depended on adequate case accrual and practitioner engagement. The decision to conduct clinical audit retrospectively or prospectively will depend on the topic to audit, the availability of data and the wishes of the team members involved. Further work is required looking at the use of clinical coding and alternatives to using practice management software to improve retrospective data availability for clinical audit. clinical audit farm animal practice farm animal veterinary medicine quality improvement retrospective clinical audit prospective clinical audit Veterinary medicine Constance White verfasserin aut Rachel S. Dean verfasserin aut Chris Hudson verfasserin aut Jonathan N. Huxley verfasserin aut Marnie L. Brennan verfasserin aut In Veterinary Sciences MDPI AG, 2014 8(2021), 4, p 62 (DE-627)785698477 (DE-600)2768971-2 23067381 nnns volume:8 year:2021 number:4, p 62 https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8040062 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/4/62 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2306-7381 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2021 4, p 62
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/vetsci8040062 doi (DE-627)DOAJ069371105 (DE-599)DOAJ5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF600-1100 Katie Waine verfasserin aut Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier As a quality improvement tool, clinical audit has been extensively described in the medical literature. There is scant literature on the use of clinical audit in the farm animal veterinary setting. This study describes the process and feasibility of prospective and retrospective data collection for farm animal clinical audit performed at three different farm animal practices in the United Kingdom. Retrospective clinical audit was difficult in all three practices due to barriers in establishing diagnosis and patient identity from clinical records. Prospective data collection proved feasible but depended on adequate case accrual and practitioner engagement. The decision to conduct clinical audit retrospectively or prospectively will depend on the topic to audit, the availability of data and the wishes of the team members involved. Further work is required looking at the use of clinical coding and alternatives to using practice management software to improve retrospective data availability for clinical audit. clinical audit farm animal practice farm animal veterinary medicine quality improvement retrospective clinical audit prospective clinical audit Veterinary medicine Constance White verfasserin aut Rachel S. Dean verfasserin aut Chris Hudson verfasserin aut Jonathan N. Huxley verfasserin aut Marnie L. Brennan verfasserin aut In Veterinary Sciences MDPI AG, 2014 8(2021), 4, p 62 (DE-627)785698477 (DE-600)2768971-2 23067381 nnns volume:8 year:2021 number:4, p 62 https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8040062 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/4/62 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2306-7381 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2021 4, p 62
allfieldsGer	10.3390/vetsci8040062 doi (DE-627)DOAJ069371105 (DE-599)DOAJ5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF600-1100 Katie Waine verfasserin aut Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier As a quality improvement tool, clinical audit has been extensively described in the medical literature. There is scant literature on the use of clinical audit in the farm animal veterinary setting. This study describes the process and feasibility of prospective and retrospective data collection for farm animal clinical audit performed at three different farm animal practices in the United Kingdom. Retrospective clinical audit was difficult in all three practices due to barriers in establishing diagnosis and patient identity from clinical records. Prospective data collection proved feasible but depended on adequate case accrual and practitioner engagement. The decision to conduct clinical audit retrospectively or prospectively will depend on the topic to audit, the availability of data and the wishes of the team members involved. Further work is required looking at the use of clinical coding and alternatives to using practice management software to improve retrospective data availability for clinical audit. clinical audit farm animal practice farm animal veterinary medicine quality improvement retrospective clinical audit prospective clinical audit Veterinary medicine Constance White verfasserin aut Rachel S. Dean verfasserin aut Chris Hudson verfasserin aut Jonathan N. Huxley verfasserin aut Marnie L. Brennan verfasserin aut In Veterinary Sciences MDPI AG, 2014 8(2021), 4, p 62 (DE-627)785698477 (DE-600)2768971-2 23067381 nnns volume:8 year:2021 number:4, p 62 https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8040062 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/4/62 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2306-7381 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2021 4, p 62
allfieldsSound	10.3390/vetsci8040062 doi (DE-627)DOAJ069371105 (DE-599)DOAJ5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF600-1100 Katie Waine verfasserin aut Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier As a quality improvement tool, clinical audit has been extensively described in the medical literature. There is scant literature on the use of clinical audit in the farm animal veterinary setting. This study describes the process and feasibility of prospective and retrospective data collection for farm animal clinical audit performed at three different farm animal practices in the United Kingdom. Retrospective clinical audit was difficult in all three practices due to barriers in establishing diagnosis and patient identity from clinical records. Prospective data collection proved feasible but depended on adequate case accrual and practitioner engagement. The decision to conduct clinical audit retrospectively or prospectively will depend on the topic to audit, the availability of data and the wishes of the team members involved. Further work is required looking at the use of clinical coding and alternatives to using practice management software to improve retrospective data availability for clinical audit. clinical audit farm animal practice farm animal veterinary medicine quality improvement retrospective clinical audit prospective clinical audit Veterinary medicine Constance White verfasserin aut Rachel S. Dean verfasserin aut Chris Hudson verfasserin aut Jonathan N. Huxley verfasserin aut Marnie L. Brennan verfasserin aut In Veterinary Sciences MDPI AG, 2014 8(2021), 4, p 62 (DE-627)785698477 (DE-600)2768971-2 23067381 nnns volume:8 year:2021 number:4, p 62 https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8040062 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/4/62 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2306-7381 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 8 2021 4, p 62
language	English
source	In Veterinary Sciences 8(2021), 4, p 62 volume:8 year:2021 number:4, p 62
sourceStr	In Veterinary Sciences 8(2021), 4, p 62 volume:8 year:2021 number:4, p 62
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	clinical audit farm animal practice farm animal veterinary medicine quality improvement retrospective clinical audit prospective clinical audit Veterinary medicine
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Veterinary Sciences
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Katie Waine @@aut@@ Constance White @@aut@@ Rachel S. Dean @@aut@@ Chris Hudson @@aut@@ Jonathan N. Huxley @@aut@@ Marnie L. Brennan @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	785698477
id	DOAJ069371105
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ069371105</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240412184306.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/vetsci8040062</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ069371105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SF600-1100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Katie Waine</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">As a quality improvement tool, clinical audit has been extensively described in the medical literature. There is scant literature on the use of clinical audit in the farm animal veterinary setting. This study describes the process and feasibility of prospective and retrospective data collection for farm animal clinical audit performed at three different farm animal practices in the United Kingdom. Retrospective clinical audit was difficult in all three practices due to barriers in establishing diagnosis and patient identity from clinical records. Prospective data collection proved feasible but depended on adequate case accrual and practitioner engagement. The decision to conduct clinical audit retrospectively or prospectively will depend on the topic to audit, the availability of data and the wishes of the team members involved. Further work is required looking at the use of clinical coding and alternatives to using practice management software to improve retrospective data availability for clinical audit.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical audit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">farm animal practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">farm animal veterinary medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality improvement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">retrospective clinical audit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prospective clinical audit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Veterinary medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Constance White</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rachel S. Dean</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chris Hudson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jonathan N. Huxley</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marnie L. Brennan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Veterinary Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2021), 4, p 62</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)785698477</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2768971-2</subfield><subfield code="x">23067381</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4, p 62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8040062</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/4/62</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2306-7381</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">4, p 62</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	S - Agriculture
author	Katie Waine
spellingShingle	Katie Waine misc SF600-1100 misc clinical audit misc farm animal practice misc farm animal veterinary medicine misc quality improvement misc retrospective clinical audit misc prospective clinical audit misc Veterinary medicine Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice
authorStr	Katie Waine
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)785698477
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	SF600-1100
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	23067381
topic_title	SF600-1100 Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice clinical audit farm animal practice farm animal veterinary medicine quality improvement retrospective clinical audit prospective clinical audit
topic	misc SF600-1100 misc clinical audit misc farm animal practice misc farm animal veterinary medicine misc quality improvement misc retrospective clinical audit misc prospective clinical audit misc Veterinary medicine
topic_unstemmed	misc SF600-1100 misc clinical audit misc farm animal practice misc farm animal veterinary medicine misc quality improvement misc retrospective clinical audit misc prospective clinical audit misc Veterinary medicine
topic_browse	misc SF600-1100 misc clinical audit misc farm animal practice misc farm animal veterinary medicine misc quality improvement misc retrospective clinical audit misc prospective clinical audit misc Veterinary medicine
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Veterinary Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id	785698477
hierarchy_top_title	Veterinary Sciences
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)785698477 (DE-600)2768971-2
title	Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ069371105 (DE-599)DOAJ5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6
title_full	Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice
author_sort	Katie Waine
journal	Veterinary Sciences
journalStr	Veterinary Sciences
callnumber-first-code	S
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Katie Waine Constance White Rachel S. Dean Chris Hudson Jonathan N. Huxley Marnie L. Brennan
container_volume	8
class	SF600-1100
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Katie Waine
doi_str_mv	10.3390/vetsci8040062
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	assessing the feasibility of retrospective and prospective clinical audit in farm animal veterinary practice
callnumber	SF600-1100
title_auth	Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice
abstract	As a quality improvement tool, clinical audit has been extensively described in the medical literature. There is scant literature on the use of clinical audit in the farm animal veterinary setting. This study describes the process and feasibility of prospective and retrospective data collection for farm animal clinical audit performed at three different farm animal practices in the United Kingdom. Retrospective clinical audit was difficult in all three practices due to barriers in establishing diagnosis and patient identity from clinical records. Prospective data collection proved feasible but depended on adequate case accrual and practitioner engagement. The decision to conduct clinical audit retrospectively or prospectively will depend on the topic to audit, the availability of data and the wishes of the team members involved. Further work is required looking at the use of clinical coding and alternatives to using practice management software to improve retrospective data availability for clinical audit.
abstractGer	As a quality improvement tool, clinical audit has been extensively described in the medical literature. There is scant literature on the use of clinical audit in the farm animal veterinary setting. This study describes the process and feasibility of prospective and retrospective data collection for farm animal clinical audit performed at three different farm animal practices in the United Kingdom. Retrospective clinical audit was difficult in all three practices due to barriers in establishing diagnosis and patient identity from clinical records. Prospective data collection proved feasible but depended on adequate case accrual and practitioner engagement. The decision to conduct clinical audit retrospectively or prospectively will depend on the topic to audit, the availability of data and the wishes of the team members involved. Further work is required looking at the use of clinical coding and alternatives to using practice management software to improve retrospective data availability for clinical audit.
abstract_unstemmed	As a quality improvement tool, clinical audit has been extensively described in the medical literature. There is scant literature on the use of clinical audit in the farm animal veterinary setting. This study describes the process and feasibility of prospective and retrospective data collection for farm animal clinical audit performed at three different farm animal practices in the United Kingdom. Retrospective clinical audit was difficult in all three practices due to barriers in establishing diagnosis and patient identity from clinical records. Prospective data collection proved feasible but depended on adequate case accrual and practitioner engagement. The decision to conduct clinical audit retrospectively or prospectively will depend on the topic to audit, the availability of data and the wishes of the team members involved. Further work is required looking at the use of clinical coding and alternatives to using practice management software to improve retrospective data availability for clinical audit.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2446 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	4, p 62
title_short	Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8040062 https://doaj.org/article/5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6 https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/4/62 https://doaj.org/toc/2306-7381
remote_bool	true
author2	Constance White Rachel S. Dean Chris Hudson Jonathan N. Huxley Marnie L. Brennan
author2Str	Constance White Rachel S. Dean Chris Hudson Jonathan N. Huxley Marnie L. Brennan
ppnlink	785698477
callnumber-subject	SF - Animal Culture
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/vetsci8040062
callnumber-a	SF600-1100
up_date	2024-07-03T22:55:50Z
_version_	1803600370074648576
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ069371105</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240412184306.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/vetsci8040062</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ069371105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SF600-1100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Katie Waine</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">As a quality improvement tool, clinical audit has been extensively described in the medical literature. There is scant literature on the use of clinical audit in the farm animal veterinary setting. This study describes the process and feasibility of prospective and retrospective data collection for farm animal clinical audit performed at three different farm animal practices in the United Kingdom. Retrospective clinical audit was difficult in all three practices due to barriers in establishing diagnosis and patient identity from clinical records. Prospective data collection proved feasible but depended on adequate case accrual and practitioner engagement. The decision to conduct clinical audit retrospectively or prospectively will depend on the topic to audit, the availability of data and the wishes of the team members involved. Further work is required looking at the use of clinical coding and alternatives to using practice management software to improve retrospective data availability for clinical audit.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical audit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">farm animal practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">farm animal veterinary medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">quality improvement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">retrospective clinical audit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">prospective clinical audit</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Veterinary medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Constance White</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rachel S. Dean</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chris Hudson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jonathan N. Huxley</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marnie L. Brennan</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Veterinary Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2014</subfield><subfield code="g">8(2021), 4, p 62</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)785698477</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2768971-2</subfield><subfield code="x">23067381</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:8</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4, p 62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8040062</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/5f6c21a953a540048851d650784480f6</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/4/62</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2306-7381</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2446</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">8</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">4, p 62</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399255

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Assessing the Feasibility of Retrospective and Prospective Clinical Audit in Farm Animal Veterinary Practice

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?