Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals.
Aim: To evaluate, using the Scopus database, the input and output citation pattern in the year 2015 for documents published in the five main oral and maxillofacial (OMS) journals. Methods: All document types published over the 2013–2015 period by the five main OMS journals: BJOMS, JOMS, IJOMS, JCMFS...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Javier Moraga [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch |
Erschienen: |
2017 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of Oral Research - Universidad de Concepción., 2013, 6(2017), 6, Seite 160-164 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:6 ; year:2017 ; number:6 ; pages:160-164 |
Links: |
Link aufrufen |
---|
DOI / URN: |
10.17126/joralres.2017.046 |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ070706867 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ070706867 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230309094158.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230228s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.17126/joralres.2017.046 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ070706867 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a RK1-715 | |
100 | 0 | |a Javier Moraga |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals. |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Aim: To evaluate, using the Scopus database, the input and output citation pattern in the year 2015 for documents published in the five main oral and maxillofacial (OMS) journals. Methods: All document types published over the 2013–2015 period by the five main OMS journals: BJOMS, JOMS, IJOMS, JCMFS and JCFS were included. Citation and referencing data were extracted from the advanced search of Scopus. Results: A total of 2303 documents were published by the journals in 2015, and 3253 documents published in 2015 cited documents published by the journals in 2013 and 2014. Self-citation was 13.19% for the five journals as a whole, and 1024 (31.49%) documents cited journals from within the group. A total of 36,972 references were included in documents published in 2015 in the journals. Self-referencing was 6.56% for all journals as a group, and 7524 (20.35%) documents were from the group itself. From the top-20 referenced and citing journals, the presence of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and head and neck (otolaryngology) surgery journals is clear. This pattern was not the same across all the journals under study. Conclusion: There appears to be a “medical versus dental” fragmentation of research in the specialty, over a fragmentation by regions or countries. | ||
650 | 4 | |a oral and maxillofacial surgeons | |
650 | 4 | |a research | |
650 | 4 | |a education | |
650 | 4 | |a bibliometrics. | |
653 | 0 | |a Dentistry | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Oral Research |d Universidad de Concepción., 2013 |g 6(2017), 6, Seite 160-164 |w (DE-627)176062005X |x 07192479 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2017 |g number:6 |g pages:160-164 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2017.046 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/ee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/335/320 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2460 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2479 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 6 |j 2017 |e 6 |h 160-164 |
author_variant |
j m jm |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:07192479:2017----::shrargettoiterlnmxloailugrrsacacetmtibif |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
callnumber-subject-code |
RK |
publishDate |
2017 |
allfields |
10.17126/joralres.2017.046 doi (DE-627)DOAJ070706867 (DE-599)DOAJee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Javier Moraga verfasserin aut Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals. 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: To evaluate, using the Scopus database, the input and output citation pattern in the year 2015 for documents published in the five main oral and maxillofacial (OMS) journals. Methods: All document types published over the 2013–2015 period by the five main OMS journals: BJOMS, JOMS, IJOMS, JCMFS and JCFS were included. Citation and referencing data were extracted from the advanced search of Scopus. Results: A total of 2303 documents were published by the journals in 2015, and 3253 documents published in 2015 cited documents published by the journals in 2013 and 2014. Self-citation was 13.19% for the five journals as a whole, and 1024 (31.49%) documents cited journals from within the group. A total of 36,972 references were included in documents published in 2015 in the journals. Self-referencing was 6.56% for all journals as a group, and 7524 (20.35%) documents were from the group itself. From the top-20 referenced and citing journals, the presence of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and head and neck (otolaryngology) surgery journals is clear. This pattern was not the same across all the journals under study. Conclusion: There appears to be a “medical versus dental” fragmentation of research in the specialty, over a fragmentation by regions or countries. oral and maxillofacial surgeons research education bibliometrics. Dentistry In Journal of Oral Research Universidad de Concepción., 2013 6(2017), 6, Seite 160-164 (DE-627)176062005X 07192479 nnns volume:6 year:2017 number:6 pages:160-164 https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2017.046 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 kostenfrei http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/335/320 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2460 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2479 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 6 2017 6 160-164 |
spelling |
10.17126/joralres.2017.046 doi (DE-627)DOAJ070706867 (DE-599)DOAJee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Javier Moraga verfasserin aut Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals. 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: To evaluate, using the Scopus database, the input and output citation pattern in the year 2015 for documents published in the five main oral and maxillofacial (OMS) journals. Methods: All document types published over the 2013–2015 period by the five main OMS journals: BJOMS, JOMS, IJOMS, JCMFS and JCFS were included. Citation and referencing data were extracted from the advanced search of Scopus. Results: A total of 2303 documents were published by the journals in 2015, and 3253 documents published in 2015 cited documents published by the journals in 2013 and 2014. Self-citation was 13.19% for the five journals as a whole, and 1024 (31.49%) documents cited journals from within the group. A total of 36,972 references were included in documents published in 2015 in the journals. Self-referencing was 6.56% for all journals as a group, and 7524 (20.35%) documents were from the group itself. From the top-20 referenced and citing journals, the presence of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and head and neck (otolaryngology) surgery journals is clear. This pattern was not the same across all the journals under study. Conclusion: There appears to be a “medical versus dental” fragmentation of research in the specialty, over a fragmentation by regions or countries. oral and maxillofacial surgeons research education bibliometrics. Dentistry In Journal of Oral Research Universidad de Concepción., 2013 6(2017), 6, Seite 160-164 (DE-627)176062005X 07192479 nnns volume:6 year:2017 number:6 pages:160-164 https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2017.046 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 kostenfrei http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/335/320 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2460 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2479 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 6 2017 6 160-164 |
allfields_unstemmed |
10.17126/joralres.2017.046 doi (DE-627)DOAJ070706867 (DE-599)DOAJee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Javier Moraga verfasserin aut Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals. 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: To evaluate, using the Scopus database, the input and output citation pattern in the year 2015 for documents published in the five main oral and maxillofacial (OMS) journals. Methods: All document types published over the 2013–2015 period by the five main OMS journals: BJOMS, JOMS, IJOMS, JCMFS and JCFS were included. Citation and referencing data were extracted from the advanced search of Scopus. Results: A total of 2303 documents were published by the journals in 2015, and 3253 documents published in 2015 cited documents published by the journals in 2013 and 2014. Self-citation was 13.19% for the five journals as a whole, and 1024 (31.49%) documents cited journals from within the group. A total of 36,972 references were included in documents published in 2015 in the journals. Self-referencing was 6.56% for all journals as a group, and 7524 (20.35%) documents were from the group itself. From the top-20 referenced and citing journals, the presence of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and head and neck (otolaryngology) surgery journals is clear. This pattern was not the same across all the journals under study. Conclusion: There appears to be a “medical versus dental” fragmentation of research in the specialty, over a fragmentation by regions or countries. oral and maxillofacial surgeons research education bibliometrics. Dentistry In Journal of Oral Research Universidad de Concepción., 2013 6(2017), 6, Seite 160-164 (DE-627)176062005X 07192479 nnns volume:6 year:2017 number:6 pages:160-164 https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2017.046 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 kostenfrei http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/335/320 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2460 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2479 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 6 2017 6 160-164 |
allfieldsGer |
10.17126/joralres.2017.046 doi (DE-627)DOAJ070706867 (DE-599)DOAJee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Javier Moraga verfasserin aut Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals. 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: To evaluate, using the Scopus database, the input and output citation pattern in the year 2015 for documents published in the five main oral and maxillofacial (OMS) journals. Methods: All document types published over the 2013–2015 period by the five main OMS journals: BJOMS, JOMS, IJOMS, JCMFS and JCFS were included. Citation and referencing data were extracted from the advanced search of Scopus. Results: A total of 2303 documents were published by the journals in 2015, and 3253 documents published in 2015 cited documents published by the journals in 2013 and 2014. Self-citation was 13.19% for the five journals as a whole, and 1024 (31.49%) documents cited journals from within the group. A total of 36,972 references were included in documents published in 2015 in the journals. Self-referencing was 6.56% for all journals as a group, and 7524 (20.35%) documents were from the group itself. From the top-20 referenced and citing journals, the presence of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and head and neck (otolaryngology) surgery journals is clear. This pattern was not the same across all the journals under study. Conclusion: There appears to be a “medical versus dental” fragmentation of research in the specialty, over a fragmentation by regions or countries. oral and maxillofacial surgeons research education bibliometrics. Dentistry In Journal of Oral Research Universidad de Concepción., 2013 6(2017), 6, Seite 160-164 (DE-627)176062005X 07192479 nnns volume:6 year:2017 number:6 pages:160-164 https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2017.046 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 kostenfrei http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/335/320 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2460 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2479 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 6 2017 6 160-164 |
allfieldsSound |
10.17126/joralres.2017.046 doi (DE-627)DOAJ070706867 (DE-599)DOAJee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RK1-715 Javier Moraga verfasserin aut Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals. 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Aim: To evaluate, using the Scopus database, the input and output citation pattern in the year 2015 for documents published in the five main oral and maxillofacial (OMS) journals. Methods: All document types published over the 2013–2015 period by the five main OMS journals: BJOMS, JOMS, IJOMS, JCMFS and JCFS were included. Citation and referencing data were extracted from the advanced search of Scopus. Results: A total of 2303 documents were published by the journals in 2015, and 3253 documents published in 2015 cited documents published by the journals in 2013 and 2014. Self-citation was 13.19% for the five journals as a whole, and 1024 (31.49%) documents cited journals from within the group. A total of 36,972 references were included in documents published in 2015 in the journals. Self-referencing was 6.56% for all journals as a group, and 7524 (20.35%) documents were from the group itself. From the top-20 referenced and citing journals, the presence of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and head and neck (otolaryngology) surgery journals is clear. This pattern was not the same across all the journals under study. Conclusion: There appears to be a “medical versus dental” fragmentation of research in the specialty, over a fragmentation by regions or countries. oral and maxillofacial surgeons research education bibliometrics. Dentistry In Journal of Oral Research Universidad de Concepción., 2013 6(2017), 6, Seite 160-164 (DE-627)176062005X 07192479 nnns volume:6 year:2017 number:6 pages:160-164 https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2017.046 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/ee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 kostenfrei http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/335/320 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2460 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2479 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 6 2017 6 160-164 |
language |
English |
source |
In Journal of Oral Research 6(2017), 6, Seite 160-164 volume:6 year:2017 number:6 pages:160-164 |
sourceStr |
In Journal of Oral Research 6(2017), 6, Seite 160-164 volume:6 year:2017 number:6 pages:160-164 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
oral and maxillofacial surgeons research education bibliometrics. Dentistry |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Journal of Oral Research |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Javier Moraga @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
176062005X |
id |
DOAJ070706867 |
language_de |
englisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ070706867</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309094158.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.17126/joralres.2017.046</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ070706867</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RK1-715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Javier Moraga</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aim: To evaluate, using the Scopus database, the input and output citation pattern in the year 2015 for documents published in the five main oral and maxillofacial (OMS) journals. Methods: All document types published over the 2013–2015 period by the five main OMS journals: BJOMS, JOMS, IJOMS, JCMFS and JCFS were included. Citation and referencing data were extracted from the advanced search of Scopus. Results: A total of 2303 documents were published by the journals in 2015, and 3253 documents published in 2015 cited documents published by the journals in 2013 and 2014. Self-citation was 13.19% for the five journals as a whole, and 1024 (31.49%) documents cited journals from within the group. A total of 36,972 references were included in documents published in 2015 in the journals. Self-referencing was 6.56% for all journals as a group, and 7524 (20.35%) documents were from the group itself. From the top-20 referenced and citing journals, the presence of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and head and neck (otolaryngology) surgery journals is clear. This pattern was not the same across all the journals under study. Conclusion: There appears to be a “medical versus dental” fragmentation of research in the specialty, over a fragmentation by regions or countries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oral and maxillofacial surgeons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bibliometrics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Oral Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Universidad de Concepción., 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2017), 6, Seite 160-164</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176062005X</subfield><subfield code="x">07192479</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:160-164</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2017.046</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/335/320</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2460</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2479</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">160-164</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
author |
Javier Moraga |
spellingShingle |
Javier Moraga misc RK1-715 misc oral and maxillofacial surgeons misc research misc education misc bibliometrics. misc Dentistry Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals. |
authorStr |
Javier Moraga |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)176062005X |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
RK1-715 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
07192479 |
topic_title |
RK1-715 Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals oral and maxillofacial surgeons research education bibliometrics |
topic |
misc RK1-715 misc oral and maxillofacial surgeons misc research misc education misc bibliometrics. misc Dentistry |
topic_unstemmed |
misc RK1-715 misc oral and maxillofacial surgeons misc research misc education misc bibliometrics. misc Dentistry |
topic_browse |
misc RK1-715 misc oral and maxillofacial surgeons misc research misc education misc bibliometrics. misc Dentistry |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Oral Research |
hierarchy_parent_id |
176062005X |
hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Oral Research |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)176062005X |
title |
Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals. |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ070706867 (DE-599)DOAJee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 |
title_full |
Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals |
author_sort |
Javier Moraga |
journal |
Journal of Oral Research |
journalStr |
Journal of Oral Research |
callnumber-first-code |
R |
lang_code |
eng |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2017 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
160 |
author_browse |
Javier Moraga |
container_volume |
6 |
class |
RK1-715 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Javier Moraga |
doi_str_mv |
10.17126/joralres.2017.046 |
title_sort |
is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? a scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals |
callnumber |
RK1-715 |
title_auth |
Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals. |
abstract |
Aim: To evaluate, using the Scopus database, the input and output citation pattern in the year 2015 for documents published in the five main oral and maxillofacial (OMS) journals. Methods: All document types published over the 2013–2015 period by the five main OMS journals: BJOMS, JOMS, IJOMS, JCMFS and JCFS were included. Citation and referencing data were extracted from the advanced search of Scopus. Results: A total of 2303 documents were published by the journals in 2015, and 3253 documents published in 2015 cited documents published by the journals in 2013 and 2014. Self-citation was 13.19% for the five journals as a whole, and 1024 (31.49%) documents cited journals from within the group. A total of 36,972 references were included in documents published in 2015 in the journals. Self-referencing was 6.56% for all journals as a group, and 7524 (20.35%) documents were from the group itself. From the top-20 referenced and citing journals, the presence of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and head and neck (otolaryngology) surgery journals is clear. This pattern was not the same across all the journals under study. Conclusion: There appears to be a “medical versus dental” fragmentation of research in the specialty, over a fragmentation by regions or countries. |
abstractGer |
Aim: To evaluate, using the Scopus database, the input and output citation pattern in the year 2015 for documents published in the five main oral and maxillofacial (OMS) journals. Methods: All document types published over the 2013–2015 period by the five main OMS journals: BJOMS, JOMS, IJOMS, JCMFS and JCFS were included. Citation and referencing data were extracted from the advanced search of Scopus. Results: A total of 2303 documents were published by the journals in 2015, and 3253 documents published in 2015 cited documents published by the journals in 2013 and 2014. Self-citation was 13.19% for the five journals as a whole, and 1024 (31.49%) documents cited journals from within the group. A total of 36,972 references were included in documents published in 2015 in the journals. Self-referencing was 6.56% for all journals as a group, and 7524 (20.35%) documents were from the group itself. From the top-20 referenced and citing journals, the presence of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and head and neck (otolaryngology) surgery journals is clear. This pattern was not the same across all the journals under study. Conclusion: There appears to be a “medical versus dental” fragmentation of research in the specialty, over a fragmentation by regions or countries. |
abstract_unstemmed |
Aim: To evaluate, using the Scopus database, the input and output citation pattern in the year 2015 for documents published in the five main oral and maxillofacial (OMS) journals. Methods: All document types published over the 2013–2015 period by the five main OMS journals: BJOMS, JOMS, IJOMS, JCMFS and JCFS were included. Citation and referencing data were extracted from the advanced search of Scopus. Results: A total of 2303 documents were published by the journals in 2015, and 3253 documents published in 2015 cited documents published by the journals in 2013 and 2014. Self-citation was 13.19% for the five journals as a whole, and 1024 (31.49%) documents cited journals from within the group. A total of 36,972 references were included in documents published in 2015 in the journals. Self-referencing was 6.56% for all journals as a group, and 7524 (20.35%) documents were from the group itself. From the top-20 referenced and citing journals, the presence of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and head and neck (otolaryngology) surgery journals is clear. This pattern was not the same across all the journals under study. Conclusion: There appears to be a “medical versus dental” fragmentation of research in the specialty, over a fragmentation by regions or countries. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
container_issue |
6 |
title_short |
Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2017.046 https://doaj.org/article/ee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8 http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/335/320 https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2460 https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2479 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
176062005X |
callnumber-subject |
RK - Dentistry |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
doi_str |
10.17126/joralres.2017.046 |
callnumber-a |
RK1-715 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T16:14:50.386Z |
_version_ |
1803575141740838912 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ070706867</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309094158.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.17126/joralres.2017.046</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ070706867</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RK1-715</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Javier Moraga</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Is there a fragmentation in the oral and maxillofacial surgery research? A scientometric brief analysis of specialty’s journals.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Aim: To evaluate, using the Scopus database, the input and output citation pattern in the year 2015 for documents published in the five main oral and maxillofacial (OMS) journals. Methods: All document types published over the 2013–2015 period by the five main OMS journals: BJOMS, JOMS, IJOMS, JCMFS and JCFS were included. Citation and referencing data were extracted from the advanced search of Scopus. Results: A total of 2303 documents were published by the journals in 2015, and 3253 documents published in 2015 cited documents published by the journals in 2013 and 2014. Self-citation was 13.19% for the five journals as a whole, and 1024 (31.49%) documents cited journals from within the group. A total of 36,972 references were included in documents published in 2015 in the journals. Self-referencing was 6.56% for all journals as a group, and 7524 (20.35%) documents were from the group itself. From the top-20 referenced and citing journals, the presence of plastic and reconstructive surgery, and head and neck (otolaryngology) surgery journals is clear. This pattern was not the same across all the journals under study. Conclusion: There appears to be a “medical versus dental” fragmentation of research in the specialty, over a fragmentation by regions or countries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">oral and maxillofacial surgeons</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bibliometrics.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dentistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Oral Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Universidad de Concepción., 2013</subfield><subfield code="g">6(2017), 6, Seite 160-164</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176062005X</subfield><subfield code="x">07192479</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:6</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:6</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:160-164</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2017.046</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/ee082f8e1ac34a3aa599a3ff12ace1e8</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/335/320</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2460</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/0719-2479</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">6</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">6</subfield><subfield code="h">160-164</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.4017696 |