Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system

O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, para avaliar a produção e a renda bruta da rúcula 'Cultivada'-R e do almeirão 'Amarelo'-A, cultivados solteiros sob três linhas (R3 e A3) e quatro linhas (R4 e A4), e nos consórcios R4A3 e R3A4, arranjados no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. Foram realizadas colheitas aos 52 dias após o semeio e aos 35 dias após a primeira colheita. Na rúcula e no almeirão, respectivamente, a altura de plantas (26,54 e 24,99 cm), o número de folhas por planta (23,4 e 16,40), o comprimento (18,62 e 24,68 cm) e a área de uma folha (66,73 e 177,0 cm²) não foram influenciados significativamente pelo número de linhas nem pelo consórcio, mas foram maiores na primeira, em relação à segunda colheita. O comprimento da folha de almeirão foi influenciado significativamente pela interação tipo de cultivo e número de linhas por canteiro, com variação de 22,74 cm no R4 até 26,78 cm no R3A4. A produção de massa fresca (15,66 e 11,62 t ha-1) e seca (1,33 e 1,00 t ha-1) de rúcula foram significativamente diferentes sob quatro e três linhas de plantas, respectivamente. No almeirão, as matérias fresca e seca foram, respectivamente, de 12,55 e 0,85 t ha-1 no A3; 15,60 e 1,13 t ha-1 no A4; 17,44 e 1,26 t ha-1 no cultivo solteiro e 10,72 e 0,72 t ha-1 no consórcio. A razão de área equivalente (RAE), para a primeira e segunda colheita, foi de 1,87 e 1,76 para R3A4 e 1,56 e 1,58 para R4A3, respectivamente. O arranjo R4A3 poderia ter gerado incrementos monetários por hectare de R$ 28.279,80 e de R$ 20.065,95 na primeira colheita e R$ 18.703,35 e de R$ 17.283,60 na segunda colheita, em relação ao almeirão e a rúcula solteira. A melhor renda bruta na segunda colheita foi no tratamento R4A3, correspondendo a 84,27% da melhor renda bruta obtida na primeira colheita, no mesmo tratamento, em ciclo vegetativo 17 dias menor.<br<The work was carried out in Dourados MS, with the objective of evaluating yield and gross income in mono-cropping and inter-cropping system. Mono-croppings of 'Cultivada' roquette-R and 'Amarelo' chicory-A, in three rows (A3) and four (A4) rows and R3A4 and R4A3 intercropping systems were studied in randomized block design, with five replications. Harvests were done at 52 days after sowing and at 35 days after the first harvest. For roquette and chicory, respectively, plant heights (26.54 and 24.99 cm), number of leaves per plant (23.4 and 16.40), length (18.62 and 24.68 cm) and area of one leaf (66.73 and 177.0 cm²) were not influenced by number of rows, neither by intercropping system, but results were greater for the first harvest than the second. Length of chicory leaf was significantly influenced by intercropped system and number of rows interaction, which ranged from 22.74 (R4) up to 26.78 cm (R3A4). Yield of fresh (15.66 and 11.62 t ha-1) and dried (1.33 and 1.00 t ha-1) mass of roquette under four and three rows were significantly different, respectively. Fresh and dried matter of chicory treatments were, respectively, 12.55 and 0.85 t ha-1 for A3, 15.60 and 1.13 t ha-1 for A4, 17.44 and 1.26 t ha-1 under mono-cropping system and 10.72 and 0.72 t ha-1 under intercropping system. LER for the first and the second harvests were 1.87 and 1.76 for R3A4 and 1.56 and 1.58 for R4A3, respectively. R4A3 arrangement could have produced monetary increases of R$ 28,279.80 and R$ 20,065.60 for the second harvest, regarding to roquette and chicory. The best gross income for the second harvest was in R4A3 treatment, with corresponded to 87% of the best gross income of the first harvest for the same treatment, with a shorter 17-day vegetative cycle. Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Wilmara Corrêa Harder [verfasserIn] Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate [verfasserIn] Maria do Carmo Vieira [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Spanisch ; Portugiesisch

Erschienen:	2005

Schlagwörter:	Cichorium intybus L. Eruca sativa Mill. associação de culturas produtividade renda bruta Eruca sativa Mill intercropping productivity income

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Ciência e Agrotecnologia - Universidade Federal de Lavras, 2007, 29(2005), 4, Seite 775-785
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:29 ; year:2005 ; number:4 ; pages:775-785

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ070813507

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ070813507
003	DE-627
005	20230503063622.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2005 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ070813507
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a spa \|a por
050		0	\|a S1-972
100	0		\|a Wilmara Corrêa Harder \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system
264		1	\|c 2005
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, para avaliar a produção e a renda bruta da rúcula 'Cultivada'-R e do almeirão 'Amarelo'-A, cultivados solteiros sob três linhas (R3 e A3) e quatro linhas (R4 e A4), e nos consórcios R4A3 e R3A4, arranjados no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. Foram realizadas colheitas aos 52 dias após o semeio e aos 35 dias após a primeira colheita. Na rúcula e no almeirão, respectivamente, a altura de plantas (26,54 e 24,99 cm), o número de folhas por planta (23,4 e 16,40), o comprimento (18,62 e 24,68 cm) e a área de uma folha (66,73 e 177,0 cm²) não foram influenciados significativamente pelo número de linhas nem pelo consórcio, mas foram maiores na primeira, em relação à segunda colheita. O comprimento da folha de almeirão foi influenciado significativamente pela interação tipo de cultivo e número de linhas por canteiro, com variação de 22,74 cm no R4 até 26,78 cm no R3A4. A produção de massa fresca (15,66 e 11,62 t ha-1) e seca (1,33 e 1,00 t ha-1) de rúcula foram significativamente diferentes sob quatro e três linhas de plantas, respectivamente. No almeirão, as matérias fresca e seca foram, respectivamente, de 12,55 e 0,85 t ha-1 no A3; 15,60 e 1,13 t ha-1 no A4; 17,44 e 1,26 t ha-1 no cultivo solteiro e 10,72 e 0,72 t ha-1 no consórcio. A razão de área equivalente (RAE), para a primeira e segunda colheita, foi de 1,87 e 1,76 para R3A4 e 1,56 e 1,58 para R4A3, respectivamente. O arranjo R4A3 poderia ter gerado incrementos monetários por hectare de R$ 28.279,80 e de R$ 20.065,95 na primeira colheita e R$ 18.703,35 e de R$ 17.283,60 na segunda colheita, em relação ao almeirão e a rúcula solteira. A melhor renda bruta na segunda colheita foi no tratamento R4A3, correspondendo a 84,27% da melhor renda bruta obtida na primeira colheita, no mesmo tratamento, em ciclo vegetativo 17 dias menor.<br<The work was carried out in Dourados MS, with the objective of evaluating yield and gross income in mono-cropping and inter-cropping system. Mono-croppings of 'Cultivada' roquette-R and 'Amarelo' chicory-A, in three rows (A3) and four (A4) rows and R3A4 and R4A3 intercropping systems were studied in randomized block design, with five replications. Harvests were done at 52 days after sowing and at 35 days after the first harvest. For roquette and chicory, respectively, plant heights (26.54 and 24.99 cm), number of leaves per plant (23.4 and 16.40), length (18.62 and 24.68 cm) and area of one leaf (66.73 and 177.0 cm²) were not influenced by number of rows, neither by intercropping system, but results were greater for the first harvest than the second. Length of chicory leaf was significantly influenced by intercropped system and number of rows interaction, which ranged from 22.74 (R4) up to 26.78 cm (R3A4). Yield of fresh (15.66 and 11.62 t ha-1) and dried (1.33 and 1.00 t ha-1) mass of roquette under four and three rows were significantly different, respectively. Fresh and dried matter of chicory treatments were, respectively, 12.55 and 0.85 t ha-1 for A3, 15.60 and 1.13 t ha-1 for A4, 17.44 and 1.26 t ha-1 under mono-cropping system and 10.72 and 0.72 t ha-1 under intercropping system. LER for the first and the second harvests were 1.87 and 1.76 for R3A4 and 1.56 and 1.58 for R4A3, respectively. R4A3 arrangement could have produced monetary increases of R$ 28,279.80 and R$ 20,065.60 for the second harvest, regarding to roquette and chicory. The best gross income for the second harvest was in R4A3 treatment, with corresponded to 87% of the best gross income of the first harvest for the same treatment, with a shorter 17-day vegetative cycle.
650		4	\|a Cichorium intybus L.
650		4	\|a Eruca sativa Mill.
650		4	\|a associação de culturas
650		4	\|a produtividade
650		4	\|a renda bruta
650		4	\|a Eruca sativa Mill
650		4	\|a intercropping
650		4	\|a productivity
650		4	\|a income
653		0	\|a Agriculture (General)
700	0		\|a Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Maria do Carmo Vieira \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Ciência e Agrotecnologia \|d Universidade Federal de Lavras, 2007 \|g 29(2005), 4, Seite 775-785 \|w (DE-627)320608247 \|w (DE-600)2021028-0 \|x 19811829 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:29 \|g year:2005 \|g number:4 \|g pages:775-785
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542005000400009 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1413-7054 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1981-1829 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 29 \|j 2005 \|e 4 \|h 775-785

Indexfelder

author_variant	w c h wch n a h z nahz m d c v mdcv
matchkey_str	article:19811829:2005----::rdornartdruarcstvmlcliaadamioihruitbsaaeomutvslereosridyedngosnoefutvdrqeteuaaiailnaaeo
hierarchy_sort_str	2005
callnumber-subject-code	S
publishDate	2005
allfields	10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 doi (DE-627)DOAJ070813507 (DE-599)DOAJ8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Wilmara Corrêa Harder verfasserin aut Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system 2005 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, para avaliar a produção e a renda bruta da rúcula 'Cultivada'-R e do almeirão 'Amarelo'-A, cultivados solteiros sob três linhas (R3 e A3) e quatro linhas (R4 e A4), e nos consórcios R4A3 e R3A4, arranjados no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. Foram realizadas colheitas aos 52 dias após o semeio e aos 35 dias após a primeira colheita. Na rúcula e no almeirão, respectivamente, a altura de plantas (26,54 e 24,99 cm), o número de folhas por planta (23,4 e 16,40), o comprimento (18,62 e 24,68 cm) e a área de uma folha (66,73 e 177,0 cm²) não foram influenciados significativamente pelo número de linhas nem pelo consórcio, mas foram maiores na primeira, em relação à segunda colheita. O comprimento da folha de almeirão foi influenciado significativamente pela interação tipo de cultivo e número de linhas por canteiro, com variação de 22,74 cm no R4 até 26,78 cm no R3A4. A produção de massa fresca (15,66 e 11,62 t ha-1) e seca (1,33 e 1,00 t ha-1) de rúcula foram significativamente diferentes sob quatro e três linhas de plantas, respectivamente. No almeirão, as matérias fresca e seca foram, respectivamente, de 12,55 e 0,85 t ha-1 no A3; 15,60 e 1,13 t ha-1 no A4; 17,44 e 1,26 t ha-1 no cultivo solteiro e 10,72 e 0,72 t ha-1 no consórcio. A razão de área equivalente (RAE), para a primeira e segunda colheita, foi de 1,87 e 1,76 para R3A4 e 1,56 e 1,58 para R4A3, respectivamente. O arranjo R4A3 poderia ter gerado incrementos monetários por hectare de R$ 28.279,80 e de R$ 20.065,95 na primeira colheita e R$ 18.703,35 e de R$ 17.283,60 na segunda colheita, em relação ao almeirão e a rúcula solteira. A melhor renda bruta na segunda colheita foi no tratamento R4A3, correspondendo a 84,27% da melhor renda bruta obtida na primeira colheita, no mesmo tratamento, em ciclo vegetativo 17 dias menor.<br<The work was carried out in Dourados MS, with the objective of evaluating yield and gross income in mono-cropping and inter-cropping system. Mono-croppings of 'Cultivada' roquette-R and 'Amarelo' chicory-A, in three rows (A3) and four (A4) rows and R3A4 and R4A3 intercropping systems were studied in randomized block design, with five replications. Harvests were done at 52 days after sowing and at 35 days after the first harvest. For roquette and chicory, respectively, plant heights (26.54 and 24.99 cm), number of leaves per plant (23.4 and 16.40), length (18.62 and 24.68 cm) and area of one leaf (66.73 and 177.0 cm²) were not influenced by number of rows, neither by intercropping system, but results were greater for the first harvest than the second. Length of chicory leaf was significantly influenced by intercropped system and number of rows interaction, which ranged from 22.74 (R4) up to 26.78 cm (R3A4). Yield of fresh (15.66 and 11.62 t ha-1) and dried (1.33 and 1.00 t ha-1) mass of roquette under four and three rows were significantly different, respectively. Fresh and dried matter of chicory treatments were, respectively, 12.55 and 0.85 t ha-1 for A3, 15.60 and 1.13 t ha-1 for A4, 17.44 and 1.26 t ha-1 under mono-cropping system and 10.72 and 0.72 t ha-1 under intercropping system. LER for the first and the second harvests were 1.87 and 1.76 for R3A4 and 1.56 and 1.58 for R4A3, respectively. R4A3 arrangement could have produced monetary increases of R$ 28,279.80 and R$ 20,065.60 for the second harvest, regarding to roquette and chicory. The best gross income for the second harvest was in R4A3 treatment, with corresponded to 87% of the best gross income of the first harvest for the same treatment, with a shorter 17-day vegetative cycle. Cichorium intybus L. Eruca sativa Mill. associação de culturas produtividade renda bruta Eruca sativa Mill intercropping productivity income Agriculture (General) Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate verfasserin aut Maria do Carmo Vieira verfasserin aut In Ciência e Agrotecnologia Universidade Federal de Lavras, 2007 29(2005), 4, Seite 775-785 (DE-627)320608247 (DE-600)2021028-0 19811829 nnns volume:29 year:2005 number:4 pages:775-785 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542005000400009 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1413-7054 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1981-1829 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 29 2005 4 775-785
spelling	10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 doi (DE-627)DOAJ070813507 (DE-599)DOAJ8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Wilmara Corrêa Harder verfasserin aut Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system 2005 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, para avaliar a produção e a renda bruta da rúcula 'Cultivada'-R e do almeirão 'Amarelo'-A, cultivados solteiros sob três linhas (R3 e A3) e quatro linhas (R4 e A4), e nos consórcios R4A3 e R3A4, arranjados no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. Foram realizadas colheitas aos 52 dias após o semeio e aos 35 dias após a primeira colheita. Na rúcula e no almeirão, respectivamente, a altura de plantas (26,54 e 24,99 cm), o número de folhas por planta (23,4 e 16,40), o comprimento (18,62 e 24,68 cm) e a área de uma folha (66,73 e 177,0 cm²) não foram influenciados significativamente pelo número de linhas nem pelo consórcio, mas foram maiores na primeira, em relação à segunda colheita. O comprimento da folha de almeirão foi influenciado significativamente pela interação tipo de cultivo e número de linhas por canteiro, com variação de 22,74 cm no R4 até 26,78 cm no R3A4. A produção de massa fresca (15,66 e 11,62 t ha-1) e seca (1,33 e 1,00 t ha-1) de rúcula foram significativamente diferentes sob quatro e três linhas de plantas, respectivamente. No almeirão, as matérias fresca e seca foram, respectivamente, de 12,55 e 0,85 t ha-1 no A3; 15,60 e 1,13 t ha-1 no A4; 17,44 e 1,26 t ha-1 no cultivo solteiro e 10,72 e 0,72 t ha-1 no consórcio. A razão de área equivalente (RAE), para a primeira e segunda colheita, foi de 1,87 e 1,76 para R3A4 e 1,56 e 1,58 para R4A3, respectivamente. O arranjo R4A3 poderia ter gerado incrementos monetários por hectare de R$ 28.279,80 e de R$ 20.065,95 na primeira colheita e R$ 18.703,35 e de R$ 17.283,60 na segunda colheita, em relação ao almeirão e a rúcula solteira. A melhor renda bruta na segunda colheita foi no tratamento R4A3, correspondendo a 84,27% da melhor renda bruta obtida na primeira colheita, no mesmo tratamento, em ciclo vegetativo 17 dias menor.<br<The work was carried out in Dourados MS, with the objective of evaluating yield and gross income in mono-cropping and inter-cropping system. Mono-croppings of 'Cultivada' roquette-R and 'Amarelo' chicory-A, in three rows (A3) and four (A4) rows and R3A4 and R4A3 intercropping systems were studied in randomized block design, with five replications. Harvests were done at 52 days after sowing and at 35 days after the first harvest. For roquette and chicory, respectively, plant heights (26.54 and 24.99 cm), number of leaves per plant (23.4 and 16.40), length (18.62 and 24.68 cm) and area of one leaf (66.73 and 177.0 cm²) were not influenced by number of rows, neither by intercropping system, but results were greater for the first harvest than the second. Length of chicory leaf was significantly influenced by intercropped system and number of rows interaction, which ranged from 22.74 (R4) up to 26.78 cm (R3A4). Yield of fresh (15.66 and 11.62 t ha-1) and dried (1.33 and 1.00 t ha-1) mass of roquette under four and three rows were significantly different, respectively. Fresh and dried matter of chicory treatments were, respectively, 12.55 and 0.85 t ha-1 for A3, 15.60 and 1.13 t ha-1 for A4, 17.44 and 1.26 t ha-1 under mono-cropping system and 10.72 and 0.72 t ha-1 under intercropping system. LER for the first and the second harvests were 1.87 and 1.76 for R3A4 and 1.56 and 1.58 for R4A3, respectively. R4A3 arrangement could have produced monetary increases of R$ 28,279.80 and R$ 20,065.60 for the second harvest, regarding to roquette and chicory. The best gross income for the second harvest was in R4A3 treatment, with corresponded to 87% of the best gross income of the first harvest for the same treatment, with a shorter 17-day vegetative cycle. Cichorium intybus L. Eruca sativa Mill. associação de culturas produtividade renda bruta Eruca sativa Mill intercropping productivity income Agriculture (General) Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate verfasserin aut Maria do Carmo Vieira verfasserin aut In Ciência e Agrotecnologia Universidade Federal de Lavras, 2007 29(2005), 4, Seite 775-785 (DE-627)320608247 (DE-600)2021028-0 19811829 nnns volume:29 year:2005 number:4 pages:775-785 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542005000400009 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1413-7054 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1981-1829 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 29 2005 4 775-785
allfields_unstemmed	10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 doi (DE-627)DOAJ070813507 (DE-599)DOAJ8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Wilmara Corrêa Harder verfasserin aut Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system 2005 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, para avaliar a produção e a renda bruta da rúcula 'Cultivada'-R e do almeirão 'Amarelo'-A, cultivados solteiros sob três linhas (R3 e A3) e quatro linhas (R4 e A4), e nos consórcios R4A3 e R3A4, arranjados no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. Foram realizadas colheitas aos 52 dias após o semeio e aos 35 dias após a primeira colheita. Na rúcula e no almeirão, respectivamente, a altura de plantas (26,54 e 24,99 cm), o número de folhas por planta (23,4 e 16,40), o comprimento (18,62 e 24,68 cm) e a área de uma folha (66,73 e 177,0 cm²) não foram influenciados significativamente pelo número de linhas nem pelo consórcio, mas foram maiores na primeira, em relação à segunda colheita. O comprimento da folha de almeirão foi influenciado significativamente pela interação tipo de cultivo e número de linhas por canteiro, com variação de 22,74 cm no R4 até 26,78 cm no R3A4. A produção de massa fresca (15,66 e 11,62 t ha-1) e seca (1,33 e 1,00 t ha-1) de rúcula foram significativamente diferentes sob quatro e três linhas de plantas, respectivamente. No almeirão, as matérias fresca e seca foram, respectivamente, de 12,55 e 0,85 t ha-1 no A3; 15,60 e 1,13 t ha-1 no A4; 17,44 e 1,26 t ha-1 no cultivo solteiro e 10,72 e 0,72 t ha-1 no consórcio. A razão de área equivalente (RAE), para a primeira e segunda colheita, foi de 1,87 e 1,76 para R3A4 e 1,56 e 1,58 para R4A3, respectivamente. O arranjo R4A3 poderia ter gerado incrementos monetários por hectare de R$ 28.279,80 e de R$ 20.065,95 na primeira colheita e R$ 18.703,35 e de R$ 17.283,60 na segunda colheita, em relação ao almeirão e a rúcula solteira. A melhor renda bruta na segunda colheita foi no tratamento R4A3, correspondendo a 84,27% da melhor renda bruta obtida na primeira colheita, no mesmo tratamento, em ciclo vegetativo 17 dias menor.<br<The work was carried out in Dourados MS, with the objective of evaluating yield and gross income in mono-cropping and inter-cropping system. Mono-croppings of 'Cultivada' roquette-R and 'Amarelo' chicory-A, in three rows (A3) and four (A4) rows and R3A4 and R4A3 intercropping systems were studied in randomized block design, with five replications. Harvests were done at 52 days after sowing and at 35 days after the first harvest. For roquette and chicory, respectively, plant heights (26.54 and 24.99 cm), number of leaves per plant (23.4 and 16.40), length (18.62 and 24.68 cm) and area of one leaf (66.73 and 177.0 cm²) were not influenced by number of rows, neither by intercropping system, but results were greater for the first harvest than the second. Length of chicory leaf was significantly influenced by intercropped system and number of rows interaction, which ranged from 22.74 (R4) up to 26.78 cm (R3A4). Yield of fresh (15.66 and 11.62 t ha-1) and dried (1.33 and 1.00 t ha-1) mass of roquette under four and three rows were significantly different, respectively. Fresh and dried matter of chicory treatments were, respectively, 12.55 and 0.85 t ha-1 for A3, 15.60 and 1.13 t ha-1 for A4, 17.44 and 1.26 t ha-1 under mono-cropping system and 10.72 and 0.72 t ha-1 under intercropping system. LER for the first and the second harvests were 1.87 and 1.76 for R3A4 and 1.56 and 1.58 for R4A3, respectively. R4A3 arrangement could have produced monetary increases of R$ 28,279.80 and R$ 20,065.60 for the second harvest, regarding to roquette and chicory. The best gross income for the second harvest was in R4A3 treatment, with corresponded to 87% of the best gross income of the first harvest for the same treatment, with a shorter 17-day vegetative cycle. Cichorium intybus L. Eruca sativa Mill. associação de culturas produtividade renda bruta Eruca sativa Mill intercropping productivity income Agriculture (General) Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate verfasserin aut Maria do Carmo Vieira verfasserin aut In Ciência e Agrotecnologia Universidade Federal de Lavras, 2007 29(2005), 4, Seite 775-785 (DE-627)320608247 (DE-600)2021028-0 19811829 nnns volume:29 year:2005 number:4 pages:775-785 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542005000400009 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1413-7054 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1981-1829 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 29 2005 4 775-785
allfieldsGer	10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 doi (DE-627)DOAJ070813507 (DE-599)DOAJ8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Wilmara Corrêa Harder verfasserin aut Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system 2005 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, para avaliar a produção e a renda bruta da rúcula 'Cultivada'-R e do almeirão 'Amarelo'-A, cultivados solteiros sob três linhas (R3 e A3) e quatro linhas (R4 e A4), e nos consórcios R4A3 e R3A4, arranjados no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. Foram realizadas colheitas aos 52 dias após o semeio e aos 35 dias após a primeira colheita. Na rúcula e no almeirão, respectivamente, a altura de plantas (26,54 e 24,99 cm), o número de folhas por planta (23,4 e 16,40), o comprimento (18,62 e 24,68 cm) e a área de uma folha (66,73 e 177,0 cm²) não foram influenciados significativamente pelo número de linhas nem pelo consórcio, mas foram maiores na primeira, em relação à segunda colheita. O comprimento da folha de almeirão foi influenciado significativamente pela interação tipo de cultivo e número de linhas por canteiro, com variação de 22,74 cm no R4 até 26,78 cm no R3A4. A produção de massa fresca (15,66 e 11,62 t ha-1) e seca (1,33 e 1,00 t ha-1) de rúcula foram significativamente diferentes sob quatro e três linhas de plantas, respectivamente. No almeirão, as matérias fresca e seca foram, respectivamente, de 12,55 e 0,85 t ha-1 no A3; 15,60 e 1,13 t ha-1 no A4; 17,44 e 1,26 t ha-1 no cultivo solteiro e 10,72 e 0,72 t ha-1 no consórcio. A razão de área equivalente (RAE), para a primeira e segunda colheita, foi de 1,87 e 1,76 para R3A4 e 1,56 e 1,58 para R4A3, respectivamente. O arranjo R4A3 poderia ter gerado incrementos monetários por hectare de R$ 28.279,80 e de R$ 20.065,95 na primeira colheita e R$ 18.703,35 e de R$ 17.283,60 na segunda colheita, em relação ao almeirão e a rúcula solteira. A melhor renda bruta na segunda colheita foi no tratamento R4A3, correspondendo a 84,27% da melhor renda bruta obtida na primeira colheita, no mesmo tratamento, em ciclo vegetativo 17 dias menor.<br<The work was carried out in Dourados MS, with the objective of evaluating yield and gross income in mono-cropping and inter-cropping system. Mono-croppings of 'Cultivada' roquette-R and 'Amarelo' chicory-A, in three rows (A3) and four (A4) rows and R3A4 and R4A3 intercropping systems were studied in randomized block design, with five replications. Harvests were done at 52 days after sowing and at 35 days after the first harvest. For roquette and chicory, respectively, plant heights (26.54 and 24.99 cm), number of leaves per plant (23.4 and 16.40), length (18.62 and 24.68 cm) and area of one leaf (66.73 and 177.0 cm²) were not influenced by number of rows, neither by intercropping system, but results were greater for the first harvest than the second. Length of chicory leaf was significantly influenced by intercropped system and number of rows interaction, which ranged from 22.74 (R4) up to 26.78 cm (R3A4). Yield of fresh (15.66 and 11.62 t ha-1) and dried (1.33 and 1.00 t ha-1) mass of roquette under four and three rows were significantly different, respectively. Fresh and dried matter of chicory treatments were, respectively, 12.55 and 0.85 t ha-1 for A3, 15.60 and 1.13 t ha-1 for A4, 17.44 and 1.26 t ha-1 under mono-cropping system and 10.72 and 0.72 t ha-1 under intercropping system. LER for the first and the second harvests were 1.87 and 1.76 for R3A4 and 1.56 and 1.58 for R4A3, respectively. R4A3 arrangement could have produced monetary increases of R$ 28,279.80 and R$ 20,065.60 for the second harvest, regarding to roquette and chicory. The best gross income for the second harvest was in R4A3 treatment, with corresponded to 87% of the best gross income of the first harvest for the same treatment, with a shorter 17-day vegetative cycle. Cichorium intybus L. Eruca sativa Mill. associação de culturas produtividade renda bruta Eruca sativa Mill intercropping productivity income Agriculture (General) Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate verfasserin aut Maria do Carmo Vieira verfasserin aut In Ciência e Agrotecnologia Universidade Federal de Lavras, 2007 29(2005), 4, Seite 775-785 (DE-627)320608247 (DE-600)2021028-0 19811829 nnns volume:29 year:2005 number:4 pages:775-785 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542005000400009 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1413-7054 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1981-1829 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 29 2005 4 775-785
allfieldsSound	10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 doi (DE-627)DOAJ070813507 (DE-599)DOAJ8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 Wilmara Corrêa Harder verfasserin aut Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system 2005 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, para avaliar a produção e a renda bruta da rúcula 'Cultivada'-R e do almeirão 'Amarelo'-A, cultivados solteiros sob três linhas (R3 e A3) e quatro linhas (R4 e A4), e nos consórcios R4A3 e R3A4, arranjados no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. Foram realizadas colheitas aos 52 dias após o semeio e aos 35 dias após a primeira colheita. Na rúcula e no almeirão, respectivamente, a altura de plantas (26,54 e 24,99 cm), o número de folhas por planta (23,4 e 16,40), o comprimento (18,62 e 24,68 cm) e a área de uma folha (66,73 e 177,0 cm²) não foram influenciados significativamente pelo número de linhas nem pelo consórcio, mas foram maiores na primeira, em relação à segunda colheita. O comprimento da folha de almeirão foi influenciado significativamente pela interação tipo de cultivo e número de linhas por canteiro, com variação de 22,74 cm no R4 até 26,78 cm no R3A4. A produção de massa fresca (15,66 e 11,62 t ha-1) e seca (1,33 e 1,00 t ha-1) de rúcula foram significativamente diferentes sob quatro e três linhas de plantas, respectivamente. No almeirão, as matérias fresca e seca foram, respectivamente, de 12,55 e 0,85 t ha-1 no A3; 15,60 e 1,13 t ha-1 no A4; 17,44 e 1,26 t ha-1 no cultivo solteiro e 10,72 e 0,72 t ha-1 no consórcio. A razão de área equivalente (RAE), para a primeira e segunda colheita, foi de 1,87 e 1,76 para R3A4 e 1,56 e 1,58 para R4A3, respectivamente. O arranjo R4A3 poderia ter gerado incrementos monetários por hectare de R$ 28.279,80 e de R$ 20.065,95 na primeira colheita e R$ 18.703,35 e de R$ 17.283,60 na segunda colheita, em relação ao almeirão e a rúcula solteira. A melhor renda bruta na segunda colheita foi no tratamento R4A3, correspondendo a 84,27% da melhor renda bruta obtida na primeira colheita, no mesmo tratamento, em ciclo vegetativo 17 dias menor.<br<The work was carried out in Dourados MS, with the objective of evaluating yield and gross income in mono-cropping and inter-cropping system. Mono-croppings of 'Cultivada' roquette-R and 'Amarelo' chicory-A, in three rows (A3) and four (A4) rows and R3A4 and R4A3 intercropping systems were studied in randomized block design, with five replications. Harvests were done at 52 days after sowing and at 35 days after the first harvest. For roquette and chicory, respectively, plant heights (26.54 and 24.99 cm), number of leaves per plant (23.4 and 16.40), length (18.62 and 24.68 cm) and area of one leaf (66.73 and 177.0 cm²) were not influenced by number of rows, neither by intercropping system, but results were greater for the first harvest than the second. Length of chicory leaf was significantly influenced by intercropped system and number of rows interaction, which ranged from 22.74 (R4) up to 26.78 cm (R3A4). Yield of fresh (15.66 and 11.62 t ha-1) and dried (1.33 and 1.00 t ha-1) mass of roquette under four and three rows were significantly different, respectively. Fresh and dried matter of chicory treatments were, respectively, 12.55 and 0.85 t ha-1 for A3, 15.60 and 1.13 t ha-1 for A4, 17.44 and 1.26 t ha-1 under mono-cropping system and 10.72 and 0.72 t ha-1 under intercropping system. LER for the first and the second harvests were 1.87 and 1.76 for R3A4 and 1.56 and 1.58 for R4A3, respectively. R4A3 arrangement could have produced monetary increases of R$ 28,279.80 and R$ 20,065.60 for the second harvest, regarding to roquette and chicory. The best gross income for the second harvest was in R4A3 treatment, with corresponded to 87% of the best gross income of the first harvest for the same treatment, with a shorter 17-day vegetative cycle. Cichorium intybus L. Eruca sativa Mill. associação de culturas produtividade renda bruta Eruca sativa Mill intercropping productivity income Agriculture (General) Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate verfasserin aut Maria do Carmo Vieira verfasserin aut In Ciência e Agrotecnologia Universidade Federal de Lavras, 2007 29(2005), 4, Seite 775-785 (DE-627)320608247 (DE-600)2021028-0 19811829 nnns volume:29 year:2005 number:4 pages:775-785 https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542005000400009 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1413-7054 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1981-1829 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 29 2005 4 775-785
language	English Spanish Portuguese
source	In Ciência e Agrotecnologia 29(2005), 4, Seite 775-785 volume:29 year:2005 number:4 pages:775-785
sourceStr	In Ciência e Agrotecnologia 29(2005), 4, Seite 775-785 volume:29 year:2005 number:4 pages:775-785
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	Cichorium intybus L. Eruca sativa Mill. associação de culturas produtividade renda bruta Eruca sativa Mill intercropping productivity income Agriculture (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Ciência e Agrotecnologia
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Wilmara Corrêa Harder @@aut@@ Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate @@aut@@ Maria do Carmo Vieira @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2005-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	320608247
id	DOAJ070813507
language_de	englisch spanisch portugiesisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ070813507</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503063622.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2005 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ070813507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S1-972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilmara Corrêa Harder</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, para avaliar a produção e a renda bruta da rúcula 'Cultivada'-R e do almeirão 'Amarelo'-A, cultivados solteiros sob três linhas (R3 e A3) e quatro linhas (R4 e A4), e nos consórcios R4A3 e R3A4, arranjados no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. Foram realizadas colheitas aos 52 dias após o semeio e aos 35 dias após a primeira colheita. Na rúcula e no almeirão, respectivamente, a altura de plantas (26,54 e 24,99 cm), o número de folhas por planta (23,4 e 16,40), o comprimento (18,62 e 24,68 cm) e a área de uma folha (66,73 e 177,0 cm²) não foram influenciados significativamente pelo número de linhas nem pelo consórcio, mas foram maiores na primeira, em relação à segunda colheita. O comprimento da folha de almeirão foi influenciado significativamente pela interação tipo de cultivo e número de linhas por canteiro, com variação de 22,74 cm no R4 até 26,78 cm no R3A4. A produção de massa fresca (15,66 e 11,62 t ha-1) e seca (1,33 e 1,00 t ha-1) de rúcula foram significativamente diferentes sob quatro e três linhas de plantas, respectivamente. No almeirão, as matérias fresca e seca foram, respectivamente, de 12,55 e 0,85 t ha-1 no A3; 15,60 e 1,13 t ha-1 no A4; 17,44 e 1,26 t ha-1 no cultivo solteiro e 10,72 e 0,72 t ha-1 no consórcio. A razão de área equivalente (RAE), para a primeira e segunda colheita, foi de 1,87 e 1,76 para R3A4 e 1,56 e 1,58 para R4A3, respectivamente. O arranjo R4A3 poderia ter gerado incrementos monetários por hectare de R$ 28.279,80 e de R$ 20.065,95 na primeira colheita e R$ 18.703,35 e de R$ 17.283,60 na segunda colheita, em relação ao almeirão e a rúcula solteira. A melhor renda bruta na segunda colheita foi no tratamento R4A3, correspondendo a 84,27% da melhor renda bruta obtida na primeira colheita, no mesmo tratamento, em ciclo vegetativo 17 dias menor.<br<The work was carried out in Dourados MS, with the objective of evaluating yield and gross income in mono-cropping and inter-cropping system. Mono-croppings of 'Cultivada' roquette-R and 'Amarelo' chicory-A, in three rows (A3) and four (A4) rows and R3A4 and R4A3 intercropping systems were studied in randomized block design, with five replications. Harvests were done at 52 days after sowing and at 35 days after the first harvest. For roquette and chicory, respectively, plant heights (26.54 and 24.99 cm), number of leaves per plant (23.4 and 16.40), length (18.62 and 24.68 cm) and area of one leaf (66.73 and 177.0 cm²) were not influenced by number of rows, neither by intercropping system, but results were greater for the first harvest than the second. Length of chicory leaf was significantly influenced by intercropped system and number of rows interaction, which ranged from 22.74 (R4) up to 26.78 cm (R3A4). Yield of fresh (15.66 and 11.62 t ha-1) and dried (1.33 and 1.00 t ha-1) mass of roquette under four and three rows were significantly different, respectively. Fresh and dried matter of chicory treatments were, respectively, 12.55 and 0.85 t ha-1 for A3, 15.60 and 1.13 t ha-1 for A4, 17.44 and 1.26 t ha-1 under mono-cropping system and 10.72 and 0.72 t ha-1 under intercropping system. LER for the first and the second harvests were 1.87 and 1.76 for R3A4 and 1.56 and 1.58 for R4A3, respectively. R4A3 arrangement could have produced monetary increases of R$ 28,279.80 and R$ 20,065.60 for the second harvest, regarding to roquette and chicory. The best gross income for the second harvest was in R4A3 treatment, with corresponded to 87% of the best gross income of the first harvest for the same treatment, with a shorter 17-day vegetative cycle.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cichorium intybus L.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eruca sativa Mill.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">associação de culturas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">produtividade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">renda bruta</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eruca sativa Mill</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">intercropping</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">productivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">income</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maria do Carmo Vieira</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ciência e Agrotecnologia</subfield><subfield code="d">Universidade Federal de Lavras, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2005), 4, Seite 775-785</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320608247</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2021028-0</subfield><subfield code="x">19811829</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:775-785</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542005000400009</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1413-7054</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1981-1829</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">775-785</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	S - Agriculture
author	Wilmara Corrêa Harder
spellingShingle	Wilmara Corrêa Harder misc S1-972 misc Cichorium intybus L. misc Eruca sativa Mill. misc associação de culturas misc produtividade misc renda bruta misc Eruca sativa Mill misc intercropping misc productivity misc income misc Agriculture (General) Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system
authorStr	Wilmara Corrêa Harder
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)320608247
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	S1-972
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	19811829
topic_title	S1-972 Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system Cichorium intybus L. Eruca sativa Mill associação de culturas produtividade renda bruta intercropping productivity income
topic	misc S1-972 misc Cichorium intybus L. misc Eruca sativa Mill. misc associação de culturas misc produtividade misc renda bruta misc Eruca sativa Mill misc intercropping misc productivity misc income misc Agriculture (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc S1-972 misc Cichorium intybus L. misc Eruca sativa Mill. misc associação de culturas misc produtividade misc renda bruta misc Eruca sativa Mill misc intercropping misc productivity misc income misc Agriculture (General)
topic_browse	misc S1-972 misc Cichorium intybus L. misc Eruca sativa Mill. misc associação de culturas misc produtividade misc renda bruta misc Eruca sativa Mill misc intercropping misc productivity misc income misc Agriculture (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Ciência e Agrotecnologia
hierarchy_parent_id	320608247
hierarchy_top_title	Ciência e Agrotecnologia
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)320608247 (DE-600)2021028-0
title	Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ070813507 (DE-599)DOAJ8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1
title_full	Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system
author_sort	Wilmara Corrêa Harder
journal	Ciência e Agrotecnologia
journalStr	Ciência e Agrotecnologia
callnumber-first-code	S
lang_code	eng spa por
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2005
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	775
author_browse	Wilmara Corrêa Harder Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate Maria do Carmo Vieira
container_volume	29
class	S1-972
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Wilmara Corrêa Harder
doi_str_mv	10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	produção e renda bruta de rúcula (eruca sativa mill.) 'cultivada' e de almeirão (cichorium intybus l.) 'amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado yield and gross income of 'cultivada' roquette (eruca sativa mill) and 'amarelo' chicory (cichorium intybus l.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system
callnumber	S1-972
title_auth	Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system
abstract	O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, para avaliar a produção e a renda bruta da rúcula 'Cultivada'-R e do almeirão 'Amarelo'-A, cultivados solteiros sob três linhas (R3 e A3) e quatro linhas (R4 e A4), e nos consórcios R4A3 e R3A4, arranjados no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. Foram realizadas colheitas aos 52 dias após o semeio e aos 35 dias após a primeira colheita. Na rúcula e no almeirão, respectivamente, a altura de plantas (26,54 e 24,99 cm), o número de folhas por planta (23,4 e 16,40), o comprimento (18,62 e 24,68 cm) e a área de uma folha (66,73 e 177,0 cm²) não foram influenciados significativamente pelo número de linhas nem pelo consórcio, mas foram maiores na primeira, em relação à segunda colheita. O comprimento da folha de almeirão foi influenciado significativamente pela interação tipo de cultivo e número de linhas por canteiro, com variação de 22,74 cm no R4 até 26,78 cm no R3A4. A produção de massa fresca (15,66 e 11,62 t ha-1) e seca (1,33 e 1,00 t ha-1) de rúcula foram significativamente diferentes sob quatro e três linhas de plantas, respectivamente. No almeirão, as matérias fresca e seca foram, respectivamente, de 12,55 e 0,85 t ha-1 no A3; 15,60 e 1,13 t ha-1 no A4; 17,44 e 1,26 t ha-1 no cultivo solteiro e 10,72 e 0,72 t ha-1 no consórcio. A razão de área equivalente (RAE), para a primeira e segunda colheita, foi de 1,87 e 1,76 para R3A4 e 1,56 e 1,58 para R4A3, respectivamente. O arranjo R4A3 poderia ter gerado incrementos monetários por hectare de R$ 28.279,80 e de R$ 20.065,95 na primeira colheita e R$ 18.703,35 e de R$ 17.283,60 na segunda colheita, em relação ao almeirão e a rúcula solteira. A melhor renda bruta na segunda colheita foi no tratamento R4A3, correspondendo a 84,27% da melhor renda bruta obtida na primeira colheita, no mesmo tratamento, em ciclo vegetativo 17 dias menor.<br<The work was carried out in Dourados MS, with the objective of evaluating yield and gross income in mono-cropping and inter-cropping system. Mono-croppings of 'Cultivada' roquette-R and 'Amarelo' chicory-A, in three rows (A3) and four (A4) rows and R3A4 and R4A3 intercropping systems were studied in randomized block design, with five replications. Harvests were done at 52 days after sowing and at 35 days after the first harvest. For roquette and chicory, respectively, plant heights (26.54 and 24.99 cm), number of leaves per plant (23.4 and 16.40), length (18.62 and 24.68 cm) and area of one leaf (66.73 and 177.0 cm²) were not influenced by number of rows, neither by intercropping system, but results were greater for the first harvest than the second. Length of chicory leaf was significantly influenced by intercropped system and number of rows interaction, which ranged from 22.74 (R4) up to 26.78 cm (R3A4). Yield of fresh (15.66 and 11.62 t ha-1) and dried (1.33 and 1.00 t ha-1) mass of roquette under four and three rows were significantly different, respectively. Fresh and dried matter of chicory treatments were, respectively, 12.55 and 0.85 t ha-1 for A3, 15.60 and 1.13 t ha-1 for A4, 17.44 and 1.26 t ha-1 under mono-cropping system and 10.72 and 0.72 t ha-1 under intercropping system. LER for the first and the second harvests were 1.87 and 1.76 for R3A4 and 1.56 and 1.58 for R4A3, respectively. R4A3 arrangement could have produced monetary increases of R$ 28,279.80 and R$ 20,065.60 for the second harvest, regarding to roquette and chicory. The best gross income for the second harvest was in R4A3 treatment, with corresponded to 87% of the best gross income of the first harvest for the same treatment, with a shorter 17-day vegetative cycle.
abstractGer	O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, para avaliar a produção e a renda bruta da rúcula 'Cultivada'-R e do almeirão 'Amarelo'-A, cultivados solteiros sob três linhas (R3 e A3) e quatro linhas (R4 e A4), e nos consórcios R4A3 e R3A4, arranjados no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. Foram realizadas colheitas aos 52 dias após o semeio e aos 35 dias após a primeira colheita. Na rúcula e no almeirão, respectivamente, a altura de plantas (26,54 e 24,99 cm), o número de folhas por planta (23,4 e 16,40), o comprimento (18,62 e 24,68 cm) e a área de uma folha (66,73 e 177,0 cm²) não foram influenciados significativamente pelo número de linhas nem pelo consórcio, mas foram maiores na primeira, em relação à segunda colheita. O comprimento da folha de almeirão foi influenciado significativamente pela interação tipo de cultivo e número de linhas por canteiro, com variação de 22,74 cm no R4 até 26,78 cm no R3A4. A produção de massa fresca (15,66 e 11,62 t ha-1) e seca (1,33 e 1,00 t ha-1) de rúcula foram significativamente diferentes sob quatro e três linhas de plantas, respectivamente. No almeirão, as matérias fresca e seca foram, respectivamente, de 12,55 e 0,85 t ha-1 no A3; 15,60 e 1,13 t ha-1 no A4; 17,44 e 1,26 t ha-1 no cultivo solteiro e 10,72 e 0,72 t ha-1 no consórcio. A razão de área equivalente (RAE), para a primeira e segunda colheita, foi de 1,87 e 1,76 para R3A4 e 1,56 e 1,58 para R4A3, respectivamente. O arranjo R4A3 poderia ter gerado incrementos monetários por hectare de R$ 28.279,80 e de R$ 20.065,95 na primeira colheita e R$ 18.703,35 e de R$ 17.283,60 na segunda colheita, em relação ao almeirão e a rúcula solteira. A melhor renda bruta na segunda colheita foi no tratamento R4A3, correspondendo a 84,27% da melhor renda bruta obtida na primeira colheita, no mesmo tratamento, em ciclo vegetativo 17 dias menor.<br<The work was carried out in Dourados MS, with the objective of evaluating yield and gross income in mono-cropping and inter-cropping system. Mono-croppings of 'Cultivada' roquette-R and 'Amarelo' chicory-A, in three rows (A3) and four (A4) rows and R3A4 and R4A3 intercropping systems were studied in randomized block design, with five replications. Harvests were done at 52 days after sowing and at 35 days after the first harvest. For roquette and chicory, respectively, plant heights (26.54 and 24.99 cm), number of leaves per plant (23.4 and 16.40), length (18.62 and 24.68 cm) and area of one leaf (66.73 and 177.0 cm²) were not influenced by number of rows, neither by intercropping system, but results were greater for the first harvest than the second. Length of chicory leaf was significantly influenced by intercropped system and number of rows interaction, which ranged from 22.74 (R4) up to 26.78 cm (R3A4). Yield of fresh (15.66 and 11.62 t ha-1) and dried (1.33 and 1.00 t ha-1) mass of roquette under four and three rows were significantly different, respectively. Fresh and dried matter of chicory treatments were, respectively, 12.55 and 0.85 t ha-1 for A3, 15.60 and 1.13 t ha-1 for A4, 17.44 and 1.26 t ha-1 under mono-cropping system and 10.72 and 0.72 t ha-1 under intercropping system. LER for the first and the second harvests were 1.87 and 1.76 for R3A4 and 1.56 and 1.58 for R4A3, respectively. R4A3 arrangement could have produced monetary increases of R$ 28,279.80 and R$ 20,065.60 for the second harvest, regarding to roquette and chicory. The best gross income for the second harvest was in R4A3 treatment, with corresponded to 87% of the best gross income of the first harvest for the same treatment, with a shorter 17-day vegetative cycle.
abstract_unstemmed	O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, para avaliar a produção e a renda bruta da rúcula 'Cultivada'-R e do almeirão 'Amarelo'-A, cultivados solteiros sob três linhas (R3 e A3) e quatro linhas (R4 e A4), e nos consórcios R4A3 e R3A4, arranjados no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. Foram realizadas colheitas aos 52 dias após o semeio e aos 35 dias após a primeira colheita. Na rúcula e no almeirão, respectivamente, a altura de plantas (26,54 e 24,99 cm), o número de folhas por planta (23,4 e 16,40), o comprimento (18,62 e 24,68 cm) e a área de uma folha (66,73 e 177,0 cm²) não foram influenciados significativamente pelo número de linhas nem pelo consórcio, mas foram maiores na primeira, em relação à segunda colheita. O comprimento da folha de almeirão foi influenciado significativamente pela interação tipo de cultivo e número de linhas por canteiro, com variação de 22,74 cm no R4 até 26,78 cm no R3A4. A produção de massa fresca (15,66 e 11,62 t ha-1) e seca (1,33 e 1,00 t ha-1) de rúcula foram significativamente diferentes sob quatro e três linhas de plantas, respectivamente. No almeirão, as matérias fresca e seca foram, respectivamente, de 12,55 e 0,85 t ha-1 no A3; 15,60 e 1,13 t ha-1 no A4; 17,44 e 1,26 t ha-1 no cultivo solteiro e 10,72 e 0,72 t ha-1 no consórcio. A razão de área equivalente (RAE), para a primeira e segunda colheita, foi de 1,87 e 1,76 para R3A4 e 1,56 e 1,58 para R4A3, respectivamente. O arranjo R4A3 poderia ter gerado incrementos monetários por hectare de R$ 28.279,80 e de R$ 20.065,95 na primeira colheita e R$ 18.703,35 e de R$ 17.283,60 na segunda colheita, em relação ao almeirão e a rúcula solteira. A melhor renda bruta na segunda colheita foi no tratamento R4A3, correspondendo a 84,27% da melhor renda bruta obtida na primeira colheita, no mesmo tratamento, em ciclo vegetativo 17 dias menor.<br<The work was carried out in Dourados MS, with the objective of evaluating yield and gross income in mono-cropping and inter-cropping system. Mono-croppings of 'Cultivada' roquette-R and 'Amarelo' chicory-A, in three rows (A3) and four (A4) rows and R3A4 and R4A3 intercropping systems were studied in randomized block design, with five replications. Harvests were done at 52 days after sowing and at 35 days after the first harvest. For roquette and chicory, respectively, plant heights (26.54 and 24.99 cm), number of leaves per plant (23.4 and 16.40), length (18.62 and 24.68 cm) and area of one leaf (66.73 and 177.0 cm²) were not influenced by number of rows, neither by intercropping system, but results were greater for the first harvest than the second. Length of chicory leaf was significantly influenced by intercropped system and number of rows interaction, which ranged from 22.74 (R4) up to 26.78 cm (R3A4). Yield of fresh (15.66 and 11.62 t ha-1) and dried (1.33 and 1.00 t ha-1) mass of roquette under four and three rows were significantly different, respectively. Fresh and dried matter of chicory treatments were, respectively, 12.55 and 0.85 t ha-1 for A3, 15.60 and 1.13 t ha-1 for A4, 17.44 and 1.26 t ha-1 under mono-cropping system and 10.72 and 0.72 t ha-1 under intercropping system. LER for the first and the second harvests were 1.87 and 1.76 for R3A4 and 1.56 and 1.58 for R4A3, respectively. R4A3 arrangement could have produced monetary increases of R$ 28,279.80 and R$ 20,065.60 for the second harvest, regarding to roquette and chicory. The best gross income for the second harvest was in R4A3 treatment, with corresponded to 87% of the best gross income of the first harvest for the same treatment, with a shorter 17-day vegetative cycle.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	4
title_short	Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system
url	https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009 https://doaj.org/article/8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1 http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542005000400009 https://doaj.org/toc/1413-7054 https://doaj.org/toc/1981-1829
remote_bool	true
author2	Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate Maria do Carmo Vieira
author2Str	Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate Maria do Carmo Vieira
ppnlink	320608247
callnumber-subject	S - General Agriculture
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009
callnumber-a	S1-972
up_date	2024-07-03T16:51:23.064Z
_version_	1803577440935608321
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ070813507</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503063622.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2005 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ070813507</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S1-972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wilmara Corrêa Harder</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Produção e renda bruta de rúcula (Eruca sativa Mill.) 'Cultivada' e de almeirão (Cichorium intybus L.) 'Amarelo' em cultivo solteiro e consorciado Yield and gross income of 'Cultivada' roquette (Eruca sativa Mill) and 'Amarelo' chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) in mono-cropping and intercropping system</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O trabalho foi desenvolvido em Dourados-MS, para avaliar a produção e a renda bruta da rúcula 'Cultivada'-R e do almeirão 'Amarelo'-A, cultivados solteiros sob três linhas (R3 e A3) e quatro linhas (R4 e A4), e nos consórcios R4A3 e R3A4, arranjados no delineamento experimental de blocos casualizados, com cinco repetições. Foram realizadas colheitas aos 52 dias após o semeio e aos 35 dias após a primeira colheita. Na rúcula e no almeirão, respectivamente, a altura de plantas (26,54 e 24,99 cm), o número de folhas por planta (23,4 e 16,40), o comprimento (18,62 e 24,68 cm) e a área de uma folha (66,73 e 177,0 cm²) não foram influenciados significativamente pelo número de linhas nem pelo consórcio, mas foram maiores na primeira, em relação à segunda colheita. O comprimento da folha de almeirão foi influenciado significativamente pela interação tipo de cultivo e número de linhas por canteiro, com variação de 22,74 cm no R4 até 26,78 cm no R3A4. A produção de massa fresca (15,66 e 11,62 t ha-1) e seca (1,33 e 1,00 t ha-1) de rúcula foram significativamente diferentes sob quatro e três linhas de plantas, respectivamente. No almeirão, as matérias fresca e seca foram, respectivamente, de 12,55 e 0,85 t ha-1 no A3; 15,60 e 1,13 t ha-1 no A4; 17,44 e 1,26 t ha-1 no cultivo solteiro e 10,72 e 0,72 t ha-1 no consórcio. A razão de área equivalente (RAE), para a primeira e segunda colheita, foi de 1,87 e 1,76 para R3A4 e 1,56 e 1,58 para R4A3, respectivamente. O arranjo R4A3 poderia ter gerado incrementos monetários por hectare de R$ 28.279,80 e de R$ 20.065,95 na primeira colheita e R$ 18.703,35 e de R$ 17.283,60 na segunda colheita, em relação ao almeirão e a rúcula solteira. A melhor renda bruta na segunda colheita foi no tratamento R4A3, correspondendo a 84,27% da melhor renda bruta obtida na primeira colheita, no mesmo tratamento, em ciclo vegetativo 17 dias menor.<br<The work was carried out in Dourados MS, with the objective of evaluating yield and gross income in mono-cropping and inter-cropping system. Mono-croppings of 'Cultivada' roquette-R and 'Amarelo' chicory-A, in three rows (A3) and four (A4) rows and R3A4 and R4A3 intercropping systems were studied in randomized block design, with five replications. Harvests were done at 52 days after sowing and at 35 days after the first harvest. For roquette and chicory, respectively, plant heights (26.54 and 24.99 cm), number of leaves per plant (23.4 and 16.40), length (18.62 and 24.68 cm) and area of one leaf (66.73 and 177.0 cm²) were not influenced by number of rows, neither by intercropping system, but results were greater for the first harvest than the second. Length of chicory leaf was significantly influenced by intercropped system and number of rows interaction, which ranged from 22.74 (R4) up to 26.78 cm (R3A4). Yield of fresh (15.66 and 11.62 t ha-1) and dried (1.33 and 1.00 t ha-1) mass of roquette under four and three rows were significantly different, respectively. Fresh and dried matter of chicory treatments were, respectively, 12.55 and 0.85 t ha-1 for A3, 15.60 and 1.13 t ha-1 for A4, 17.44 and 1.26 t ha-1 under mono-cropping system and 10.72 and 0.72 t ha-1 under intercropping system. LER for the first and the second harvests were 1.87 and 1.76 for R3A4 and 1.56 and 1.58 for R4A3, respectively. R4A3 arrangement could have produced monetary increases of R$ 28,279.80 and R$ 20,065.60 for the second harvest, regarding to roquette and chicory. The best gross income for the second harvest was in R4A3 treatment, with corresponded to 87% of the best gross income of the first harvest for the same treatment, with a shorter 17-day vegetative cycle.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cichorium intybus L.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eruca sativa Mill.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">associação de culturas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">produtividade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">renda bruta</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Eruca sativa Mill</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">intercropping</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">productivity</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">income</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Néstor Antonio Heredia Zárate</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Maria do Carmo Vieira</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Ciência e Agrotecnologia</subfield><subfield code="d">Universidade Federal de Lavras, 2007</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2005), 4, Seite 775-785</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)320608247</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2021028-0</subfield><subfield code="x">19811829</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2005</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:775-785</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542005000400009</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/8a2a21439e944b998e23a8cd18b6d5b1</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-70542005000400009</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1413-7054</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1981-1829</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2005</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">775-785</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.402135

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?