Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods

Retaining walls are geostructures providing permanent lateral support to vertical slopes of soil, and it is essential to analyze the failure probability of such a structure. To keep the importance of geotechnics on par with the advancement in technology, the implementation of artificial intelligence...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Pratishtha Mishra [verfasserIn] Pijush Samui [verfasserIn] Elham Mahmoudi [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	retaining wall neural network reliability analysis

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Applied Sciences - MDPI AG, 2012, 11(2021), 12, p 5411
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:11 ; year:2021 ; number:12, p 5411

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.3390/app11125411

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ071980032

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ071980032
003	DE-627
005	20240412174631.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.3390/app11125411 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ071980032
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJb83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
050		0	\|a TA1-2040
050		0	\|a QH301-705.5
050		0	\|a QC1-999
050		0	\|a QD1-999
100	0		\|a Pratishtha Mishra \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Retaining walls are geostructures providing permanent lateral support to vertical slopes of soil, and it is essential to analyze the failure probability of such a structure. To keep the importance of geotechnics on par with the advancement in technology, the implementation of artificial intelligence techniques is done for the reliability analysis of the structure. Designing the structure based on the probability of failure leads to an economical design. Machine learning models used for predicting the factor of safety of the wall are Emotional Neural Network, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, and SOS–LSSVM. The First-Order Second Moment Method is used for calculating the reliability index of the wall. In addition, these models are assessed based on the results they produce, and the best model among these is concluded for extensive field study in the future. The overall performance evaluation through various accuracy quantification determined SOS–LSSVM as the best model. The obtained results show that the reliability index calculated by the AI methods differs from the reference values by less than 2%. These methodologies have made the problems facile by increasing the precision of the result. Artificial intelligence has removed the cumbersome calculations in almost all the acquainted fields and disciplines. The techniques used in this study are evolved versions of some older algorithms. This work aims to clarify the probabilistic approach toward designing the structures, using the artificial intelligence to simplify the practical evaluations.
650		4	\|a retaining wall
650		4	\|a neural network
650		4	\|a reliability analysis
653		0	\|a Technology
653		0	\|a T
653		0	\|a Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
653		0	\|a Biology (General)
653		0	\|a Physics
653		0	\|a Chemistry
700	0		\|a Pijush Samui \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Elham Mahmoudi \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Applied Sciences \|d MDPI AG, 2012 \|g 11(2021), 12, p 5411 \|w (DE-627)737287640 \|w (DE-600)2704225-X \|x 20763417 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:11 \|g year:2021 \|g number:12, p 5411
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125411 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/b83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/12/5411 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 11 \|j 2021 \|e 12, p 5411

Indexfelder

author_variant	p m pm p s ps e m em
matchkey_str	article:20763417:2021----::rbblsidsgortiigalsnmci
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
callnumber-subject-code	TA
publishDate	2021
allfields	10.3390/app11125411 doi (DE-627)DOAJ071980032 (DE-599)DOAJb83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 QH301-705.5 QC1-999 QD1-999 Pratishtha Mishra verfasserin aut Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Retaining walls are geostructures providing permanent lateral support to vertical slopes of soil, and it is essential to analyze the failure probability of such a structure. To keep the importance of geotechnics on par with the advancement in technology, the implementation of artificial intelligence techniques is done for the reliability analysis of the structure. Designing the structure based on the probability of failure leads to an economical design. Machine learning models used for predicting the factor of safety of the wall are Emotional Neural Network, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, and SOS–LSSVM. The First-Order Second Moment Method is used for calculating the reliability index of the wall. In addition, these models are assessed based on the results they produce, and the best model among these is concluded for extensive field study in the future. The overall performance evaluation through various accuracy quantification determined SOS–LSSVM as the best model. The obtained results show that the reliability index calculated by the AI methods differs from the reference values by less than 2%. These methodologies have made the problems facile by increasing the precision of the result. Artificial intelligence has removed the cumbersome calculations in almost all the acquainted fields and disciplines. The techniques used in this study are evolved versions of some older algorithms. This work aims to clarify the probabilistic approach toward designing the structures, using the artificial intelligence to simplify the practical evaluations. retaining wall neural network reliability analysis Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Biology (General) Physics Chemistry Pijush Samui verfasserin aut Elham Mahmoudi verfasserin aut In Applied Sciences MDPI AG, 2012 11(2021), 12, p 5411 (DE-627)737287640 (DE-600)2704225-X 20763417 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:12, p 5411 https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125411 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/12/5411 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 12, p 5411
spelling	10.3390/app11125411 doi (DE-627)DOAJ071980032 (DE-599)DOAJb83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 QH301-705.5 QC1-999 QD1-999 Pratishtha Mishra verfasserin aut Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Retaining walls are geostructures providing permanent lateral support to vertical slopes of soil, and it is essential to analyze the failure probability of such a structure. To keep the importance of geotechnics on par with the advancement in technology, the implementation of artificial intelligence techniques is done for the reliability analysis of the structure. Designing the structure based on the probability of failure leads to an economical design. Machine learning models used for predicting the factor of safety of the wall are Emotional Neural Network, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, and SOS–LSSVM. The First-Order Second Moment Method is used for calculating the reliability index of the wall. In addition, these models are assessed based on the results they produce, and the best model among these is concluded for extensive field study in the future. The overall performance evaluation through various accuracy quantification determined SOS–LSSVM as the best model. The obtained results show that the reliability index calculated by the AI methods differs from the reference values by less than 2%. These methodologies have made the problems facile by increasing the precision of the result. Artificial intelligence has removed the cumbersome calculations in almost all the acquainted fields and disciplines. The techniques used in this study are evolved versions of some older algorithms. This work aims to clarify the probabilistic approach toward designing the structures, using the artificial intelligence to simplify the practical evaluations. retaining wall neural network reliability analysis Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Biology (General) Physics Chemistry Pijush Samui verfasserin aut Elham Mahmoudi verfasserin aut In Applied Sciences MDPI AG, 2012 11(2021), 12, p 5411 (DE-627)737287640 (DE-600)2704225-X 20763417 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:12, p 5411 https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125411 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/12/5411 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 12, p 5411
allfields_unstemmed	10.3390/app11125411 doi (DE-627)DOAJ071980032 (DE-599)DOAJb83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 QH301-705.5 QC1-999 QD1-999 Pratishtha Mishra verfasserin aut Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Retaining walls are geostructures providing permanent lateral support to vertical slopes of soil, and it is essential to analyze the failure probability of such a structure. To keep the importance of geotechnics on par with the advancement in technology, the implementation of artificial intelligence techniques is done for the reliability analysis of the structure. Designing the structure based on the probability of failure leads to an economical design. Machine learning models used for predicting the factor of safety of the wall are Emotional Neural Network, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, and SOS–LSSVM. The First-Order Second Moment Method is used for calculating the reliability index of the wall. In addition, these models are assessed based on the results they produce, and the best model among these is concluded for extensive field study in the future. The overall performance evaluation through various accuracy quantification determined SOS–LSSVM as the best model. The obtained results show that the reliability index calculated by the AI methods differs from the reference values by less than 2%. These methodologies have made the problems facile by increasing the precision of the result. Artificial intelligence has removed the cumbersome calculations in almost all the acquainted fields and disciplines. The techniques used in this study are evolved versions of some older algorithms. This work aims to clarify the probabilistic approach toward designing the structures, using the artificial intelligence to simplify the practical evaluations. retaining wall neural network reliability analysis Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Biology (General) Physics Chemistry Pijush Samui verfasserin aut Elham Mahmoudi verfasserin aut In Applied Sciences MDPI AG, 2012 11(2021), 12, p 5411 (DE-627)737287640 (DE-600)2704225-X 20763417 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:12, p 5411 https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125411 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/12/5411 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 12, p 5411
allfieldsGer	10.3390/app11125411 doi (DE-627)DOAJ071980032 (DE-599)DOAJb83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 QH301-705.5 QC1-999 QD1-999 Pratishtha Mishra verfasserin aut Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Retaining walls are geostructures providing permanent lateral support to vertical slopes of soil, and it is essential to analyze the failure probability of such a structure. To keep the importance of geotechnics on par with the advancement in technology, the implementation of artificial intelligence techniques is done for the reliability analysis of the structure. Designing the structure based on the probability of failure leads to an economical design. Machine learning models used for predicting the factor of safety of the wall are Emotional Neural Network, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, and SOS–LSSVM. The First-Order Second Moment Method is used for calculating the reliability index of the wall. In addition, these models are assessed based on the results they produce, and the best model among these is concluded for extensive field study in the future. The overall performance evaluation through various accuracy quantification determined SOS–LSSVM as the best model. The obtained results show that the reliability index calculated by the AI methods differs from the reference values by less than 2%. These methodologies have made the problems facile by increasing the precision of the result. Artificial intelligence has removed the cumbersome calculations in almost all the acquainted fields and disciplines. The techniques used in this study are evolved versions of some older algorithms. This work aims to clarify the probabilistic approach toward designing the structures, using the artificial intelligence to simplify the practical evaluations. retaining wall neural network reliability analysis Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Biology (General) Physics Chemistry Pijush Samui verfasserin aut Elham Mahmoudi verfasserin aut In Applied Sciences MDPI AG, 2012 11(2021), 12, p 5411 (DE-627)737287640 (DE-600)2704225-X 20763417 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:12, p 5411 https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125411 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/12/5411 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 12, p 5411
allfieldsSound	10.3390/app11125411 doi (DE-627)DOAJ071980032 (DE-599)DOAJb83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TA1-2040 QH301-705.5 QC1-999 QD1-999 Pratishtha Mishra verfasserin aut Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Retaining walls are geostructures providing permanent lateral support to vertical slopes of soil, and it is essential to analyze the failure probability of such a structure. To keep the importance of geotechnics on par with the advancement in technology, the implementation of artificial intelligence techniques is done for the reliability analysis of the structure. Designing the structure based on the probability of failure leads to an economical design. Machine learning models used for predicting the factor of safety of the wall are Emotional Neural Network, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, and SOS–LSSVM. The First-Order Second Moment Method is used for calculating the reliability index of the wall. In addition, these models are assessed based on the results they produce, and the best model among these is concluded for extensive field study in the future. The overall performance evaluation through various accuracy quantification determined SOS–LSSVM as the best model. The obtained results show that the reliability index calculated by the AI methods differs from the reference values by less than 2%. These methodologies have made the problems facile by increasing the precision of the result. Artificial intelligence has removed the cumbersome calculations in almost all the acquainted fields and disciplines. The techniques used in this study are evolved versions of some older algorithms. This work aims to clarify the probabilistic approach toward designing the structures, using the artificial intelligence to simplify the practical evaluations. retaining wall neural network reliability analysis Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Biology (General) Physics Chemistry Pijush Samui verfasserin aut Elham Mahmoudi verfasserin aut In Applied Sciences MDPI AG, 2012 11(2021), 12, p 5411 (DE-627)737287640 (DE-600)2704225-X 20763417 nnns volume:11 year:2021 number:12, p 5411 https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125411 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/b83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6 kostenfrei https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/12/5411 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 11 2021 12, p 5411
language	English
source	In Applied Sciences 11(2021), 12, p 5411 volume:11 year:2021 number:12, p 5411
sourceStr	In Applied Sciences 11(2021), 12, p 5411 volume:11 year:2021 number:12, p 5411
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	retaining wall neural network reliability analysis Technology T Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Biology (General) Physics Chemistry
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Applied Sciences
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Pratishtha Mishra @@aut@@ Pijush Samui @@aut@@ Elham Mahmoudi @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	737287640
id	DOAJ071980032
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ071980032</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240412174631.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/app11125411</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ071980032</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TA1-2040</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH301-705.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QC1-999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QD1-999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pratishtha Mishra</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Retaining walls are geostructures providing permanent lateral support to vertical slopes of soil, and it is essential to analyze the failure probability of such a structure. To keep the importance of geotechnics on par with the advancement in technology, the implementation of artificial intelligence techniques is done for the reliability analysis of the structure. Designing the structure based on the probability of failure leads to an economical design. Machine learning models used for predicting the factor of safety of the wall are Emotional Neural Network, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, and SOS–LSSVM. The First-Order Second Moment Method is used for calculating the reliability index of the wall. In addition, these models are assessed based on the results they produce, and the best model among these is concluded for extensive field study in the future. The overall performance evaluation through various accuracy quantification determined SOS–LSSVM as the best model. The obtained results show that the reliability index calculated by the AI methods differs from the reference values by less than 2%. These methodologies have made the problems facile by increasing the precision of the result. Artificial intelligence has removed the cumbersome calculations in almost all the acquainted fields and disciplines. The techniques used in this study are evolved versions of some older algorithms. This work aims to clarify the probabilistic approach toward designing the structures, using the artificial intelligence to simplify the practical evaluations.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">retaining wall</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">neural network</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reliability analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biology (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Physics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Chemistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pijush Samui</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elham Mahmoudi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Applied Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2021), 12, p 5411</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)737287640</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2704225-X</subfield><subfield code="x">20763417</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12, p 5411</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125411</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/12/5411</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">12, p 5411</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	T - Technology
author	Pratishtha Mishra
spellingShingle	Pratishtha Mishra misc TA1-2040 misc QH301-705.5 misc QC1-999 misc QD1-999 misc retaining wall misc neural network misc reliability analysis misc Technology misc T misc Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) misc Biology (General) misc Physics misc Chemistry Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods
authorStr	Pratishtha Mishra
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)737287640
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	TA1-2040
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	20763417
topic_title	TA1-2040 QH301-705.5 QC1-999 QD1-999 Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods retaining wall neural network reliability analysis
topic	misc TA1-2040 misc QH301-705.5 misc QC1-999 misc QD1-999 misc retaining wall misc neural network misc reliability analysis misc Technology misc T misc Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) misc Biology (General) misc Physics misc Chemistry
topic_unstemmed	misc TA1-2040 misc QH301-705.5 misc QC1-999 misc QD1-999 misc retaining wall misc neural network misc reliability analysis misc Technology misc T misc Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) misc Biology (General) misc Physics misc Chemistry
topic_browse	misc TA1-2040 misc QH301-705.5 misc QC1-999 misc QD1-999 misc retaining wall misc neural network misc reliability analysis misc Technology misc T misc Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) misc Biology (General) misc Physics misc Chemistry
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Applied Sciences
hierarchy_parent_id	737287640
hierarchy_top_title	Applied Sciences
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)737287640 (DE-600)2704225-X
title	Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ071980032 (DE-599)DOAJb83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6
title_full	Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods
author_sort	Pratishtha Mishra
journal	Applied Sciences
journalStr	Applied Sciences
callnumber-first-code	T
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
author_browse	Pratishtha Mishra Pijush Samui Elham Mahmoudi
container_volume	11
class	TA1-2040 QH301-705.5 QC1-999 QD1-999
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Pratishtha Mishra
doi_str_mv	10.3390/app11125411
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	probabilistic design of retaining wall using machine learning methods
callnumber	TA1-2040
title_auth	Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods
abstract	Retaining walls are geostructures providing permanent lateral support to vertical slopes of soil, and it is essential to analyze the failure probability of such a structure. To keep the importance of geotechnics on par with the advancement in technology, the implementation of artificial intelligence techniques is done for the reliability analysis of the structure. Designing the structure based on the probability of failure leads to an economical design. Machine learning models used for predicting the factor of safety of the wall are Emotional Neural Network, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, and SOS–LSSVM. The First-Order Second Moment Method is used for calculating the reliability index of the wall. In addition, these models are assessed based on the results they produce, and the best model among these is concluded for extensive field study in the future. The overall performance evaluation through various accuracy quantification determined SOS–LSSVM as the best model. The obtained results show that the reliability index calculated by the AI methods differs from the reference values by less than 2%. These methodologies have made the problems facile by increasing the precision of the result. Artificial intelligence has removed the cumbersome calculations in almost all the acquainted fields and disciplines. The techniques used in this study are evolved versions of some older algorithms. This work aims to clarify the probabilistic approach toward designing the structures, using the artificial intelligence to simplify the practical evaluations.
abstractGer	Retaining walls are geostructures providing permanent lateral support to vertical slopes of soil, and it is essential to analyze the failure probability of such a structure. To keep the importance of geotechnics on par with the advancement in technology, the implementation of artificial intelligence techniques is done for the reliability analysis of the structure. Designing the structure based on the probability of failure leads to an economical design. Machine learning models used for predicting the factor of safety of the wall are Emotional Neural Network, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, and SOS–LSSVM. The First-Order Second Moment Method is used for calculating the reliability index of the wall. In addition, these models are assessed based on the results they produce, and the best model among these is concluded for extensive field study in the future. The overall performance evaluation through various accuracy quantification determined SOS–LSSVM as the best model. The obtained results show that the reliability index calculated by the AI methods differs from the reference values by less than 2%. These methodologies have made the problems facile by increasing the precision of the result. Artificial intelligence has removed the cumbersome calculations in almost all the acquainted fields and disciplines. The techniques used in this study are evolved versions of some older algorithms. This work aims to clarify the probabilistic approach toward designing the structures, using the artificial intelligence to simplify the practical evaluations.
abstract_unstemmed	Retaining walls are geostructures providing permanent lateral support to vertical slopes of soil, and it is essential to analyze the failure probability of such a structure. To keep the importance of geotechnics on par with the advancement in technology, the implementation of artificial intelligence techniques is done for the reliability analysis of the structure. Designing the structure based on the probability of failure leads to an economical design. Machine learning models used for predicting the factor of safety of the wall are Emotional Neural Network, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, and SOS–LSSVM. The First-Order Second Moment Method is used for calculating the reliability index of the wall. In addition, these models are assessed based on the results they produce, and the best model among these is concluded for extensive field study in the future. The overall performance evaluation through various accuracy quantification determined SOS–LSSVM as the best model. The obtained results show that the reliability index calculated by the AI methods differs from the reference values by less than 2%. These methodologies have made the problems facile by increasing the precision of the result. Artificial intelligence has removed the cumbersome calculations in almost all the acquainted fields and disciplines. The techniques used in this study are evolved versions of some older algorithms. This work aims to clarify the probabilistic approach toward designing the structures, using the artificial intelligence to simplify the practical evaluations.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_11 GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_171 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_370 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4335 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	12, p 5411
title_short	Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods
url	https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125411 https://doaj.org/article/b83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/12/5411 https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417
remote_bool	true
author2	Pijush Samui Elham Mahmoudi
author2Str	Pijush Samui Elham Mahmoudi
ppnlink	737287640
callnumber-subject	TA - General and Civil Engineering
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.3390/app11125411
callnumber-a	TA1-2040
up_date	2024-07-03T23:10:18.129Z
_version_	1803601280377028609
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ071980032</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240412174631.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.3390/app11125411</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ071980032</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJb83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TA1-2040</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QH301-705.5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QC1-999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QD1-999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pratishtha Mishra</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Retaining walls are geostructures providing permanent lateral support to vertical slopes of soil, and it is essential to analyze the failure probability of such a structure. To keep the importance of geotechnics on par with the advancement in technology, the implementation of artificial intelligence techniques is done for the reliability analysis of the structure. Designing the structure based on the probability of failure leads to an economical design. Machine learning models used for predicting the factor of safety of the wall are Emotional Neural Network, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, and SOS–LSSVM. The First-Order Second Moment Method is used for calculating the reliability index of the wall. In addition, these models are assessed based on the results they produce, and the best model among these is concluded for extensive field study in the future. The overall performance evaluation through various accuracy quantification determined SOS–LSSVM as the best model. The obtained results show that the reliability index calculated by the AI methods differs from the reference values by less than 2%. These methodologies have made the problems facile by increasing the precision of the result. Artificial intelligence has removed the cumbersome calculations in almost all the acquainted fields and disciplines. The techniques used in this study are evolved versions of some older algorithms. This work aims to clarify the probabilistic approach toward designing the structures, using the artificial intelligence to simplify the practical evaluations.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">retaining wall</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">neural network</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">reliability analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Technology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">T</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Biology (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Physics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Chemistry</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pijush Samui</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elham Mahmoudi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Applied Sciences</subfield><subfield code="d">MDPI AG, 2012</subfield><subfield code="g">11(2021), 12, p 5411</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)737287640</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2704225-X</subfield><subfield code="x">20763417</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:11</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:12, p 5411</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125411</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/b83e95bb4f4d43398dec3cc2ea9d4ac6</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/12/5411</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3417</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">11</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">12, p 5411</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.3995876

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Probabilistic Design of Retaining Wall Using Machine Learning Methods

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?