Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics
The problems of defining the criteria for determining judicial investigation situations are studied. Situations occurring during the prejudicial inquiry and legal proceedings have same epistemological nature, which allows to successfully apply the existing classification base to systematize and orde...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Voronin S.E. [verfasserIn] Kuznetsova S.M. [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Russisch |
| Erschienen: |
2014 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika - Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation, 2015, (2014), 4(30), Seite 156-162 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
year:2014 ; number:4(30) ; pages:156-162 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ073516813 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ073516813 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230309115426.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ073516813 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a rus | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K7000-7720 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Voronin S.E. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The problems of defining the criteria for determining judicial investigation situations are studied. Situations occurring during the prejudicial inquiry and legal proceedings have same epistemological nature, which allows to successfully apply the existing classification base to systematize and order the situations of judicial investigation. The author distinguishes the judicial problem-searching situations, occurring in the courts of original jurisdiction, of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority, differing in the character of problem raised and solved by the court. The typical situation in the courts of original jurisdiction is collecting evidence sufficient for making judicial decision. The typical situation in the courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority is validating decisions made by the court of original jurisdiction. The difference in the line of development of typical judicial investigation situations and search and cognitive activity’s character is shown. The author distinguishes typical problem-searching judicial situations, occurring in the court of original jurisdiction, connected with: 1) saving the evidence seized during prejudicial inquiry; 2) filling the gaps in prejudicial inquiry materials; 3) providing judicial assessment of evidence; 4) making judicial decision. The court of original jurisdiction adjudicates in a case, courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority review the judicial decision (their revision activity is provided with search and cognitive means to a lesser extent). The most widespread problem-searching judicial situations in the court of appellate jurisdiction are distinguished. The information uncertainty in mentioned situations cannot be overcome by cognitive means of such courts. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a classification criteria | |
| 650 | 4 | |a judicial investigation situation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a problem-searching judicial investigation situation | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Private international law. Conflict of laws | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Kuznetsova S.M. |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika |d Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation, 2015 |g (2014), 4(30), Seite 156-162 |w (DE-627)1760623334 |x 19986963 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2014 |g number:4(30) |g pages:156-162 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/voronin_kuznetsova.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1998-6963 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |j 2014 |e 4(30) |h 156-162 | ||
| author_variant |
v s vs k s ks |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:19986963:2014----::lsiiainfuiilnetgtostainadtiprac |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2014 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
K |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ073516813 (DE-599)DOAJ868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus K7000-7720 Voronin S.E. verfasserin aut Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The problems of defining the criteria for determining judicial investigation situations are studied. Situations occurring during the prejudicial inquiry and legal proceedings have same epistemological nature, which allows to successfully apply the existing classification base to systematize and order the situations of judicial investigation. The author distinguishes the judicial problem-searching situations, occurring in the courts of original jurisdiction, of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority, differing in the character of problem raised and solved by the court. The typical situation in the courts of original jurisdiction is collecting evidence sufficient for making judicial decision. The typical situation in the courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority is validating decisions made by the court of original jurisdiction. The difference in the line of development of typical judicial investigation situations and search and cognitive activity’s character is shown. The author distinguishes typical problem-searching judicial situations, occurring in the court of original jurisdiction, connected with: 1) saving the evidence seized during prejudicial inquiry; 2) filling the gaps in prejudicial inquiry materials; 3) providing judicial assessment of evidence; 4) making judicial decision. The court of original jurisdiction adjudicates in a case, courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority review the judicial decision (their revision activity is provided with search and cognitive means to a lesser extent). The most widespread problem-searching judicial situations in the court of appellate jurisdiction are distinguished. The information uncertainty in mentioned situations cannot be overcome by cognitive means of such courts. classification criteria judicial investigation situation problem-searching judicial investigation situation Private international law. Conflict of laws Kuznetsova S.M. verfasserin aut In Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation, 2015 (2014), 4(30), Seite 156-162 (DE-627)1760623334 19986963 nnns year:2014 number:4(30) pages:156-162 https://doaj.org/article/868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 kostenfrei http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/voronin_kuznetsova.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1998-6963 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2014 4(30) 156-162 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ073516813 (DE-599)DOAJ868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus K7000-7720 Voronin S.E. verfasserin aut Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The problems of defining the criteria for determining judicial investigation situations are studied. Situations occurring during the prejudicial inquiry and legal proceedings have same epistemological nature, which allows to successfully apply the existing classification base to systematize and order the situations of judicial investigation. The author distinguishes the judicial problem-searching situations, occurring in the courts of original jurisdiction, of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority, differing in the character of problem raised and solved by the court. The typical situation in the courts of original jurisdiction is collecting evidence sufficient for making judicial decision. The typical situation in the courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority is validating decisions made by the court of original jurisdiction. The difference in the line of development of typical judicial investigation situations and search and cognitive activity’s character is shown. The author distinguishes typical problem-searching judicial situations, occurring in the court of original jurisdiction, connected with: 1) saving the evidence seized during prejudicial inquiry; 2) filling the gaps in prejudicial inquiry materials; 3) providing judicial assessment of evidence; 4) making judicial decision. The court of original jurisdiction adjudicates in a case, courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority review the judicial decision (their revision activity is provided with search and cognitive means to a lesser extent). The most widespread problem-searching judicial situations in the court of appellate jurisdiction are distinguished. The information uncertainty in mentioned situations cannot be overcome by cognitive means of such courts. classification criteria judicial investigation situation problem-searching judicial investigation situation Private international law. Conflict of laws Kuznetsova S.M. verfasserin aut In Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation, 2015 (2014), 4(30), Seite 156-162 (DE-627)1760623334 19986963 nnns year:2014 number:4(30) pages:156-162 https://doaj.org/article/868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 kostenfrei http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/voronin_kuznetsova.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1998-6963 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2014 4(30) 156-162 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ073516813 (DE-599)DOAJ868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus K7000-7720 Voronin S.E. verfasserin aut Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The problems of defining the criteria for determining judicial investigation situations are studied. Situations occurring during the prejudicial inquiry and legal proceedings have same epistemological nature, which allows to successfully apply the existing classification base to systematize and order the situations of judicial investigation. The author distinguishes the judicial problem-searching situations, occurring in the courts of original jurisdiction, of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority, differing in the character of problem raised and solved by the court. The typical situation in the courts of original jurisdiction is collecting evidence sufficient for making judicial decision. The typical situation in the courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority is validating decisions made by the court of original jurisdiction. The difference in the line of development of typical judicial investigation situations and search and cognitive activity’s character is shown. The author distinguishes typical problem-searching judicial situations, occurring in the court of original jurisdiction, connected with: 1) saving the evidence seized during prejudicial inquiry; 2) filling the gaps in prejudicial inquiry materials; 3) providing judicial assessment of evidence; 4) making judicial decision. The court of original jurisdiction adjudicates in a case, courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority review the judicial decision (their revision activity is provided with search and cognitive means to a lesser extent). The most widespread problem-searching judicial situations in the court of appellate jurisdiction are distinguished. The information uncertainty in mentioned situations cannot be overcome by cognitive means of such courts. classification criteria judicial investigation situation problem-searching judicial investigation situation Private international law. Conflict of laws Kuznetsova S.M. verfasserin aut In Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation, 2015 (2014), 4(30), Seite 156-162 (DE-627)1760623334 19986963 nnns year:2014 number:4(30) pages:156-162 https://doaj.org/article/868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 kostenfrei http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/voronin_kuznetsova.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1998-6963 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2014 4(30) 156-162 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ073516813 (DE-599)DOAJ868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus K7000-7720 Voronin S.E. verfasserin aut Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The problems of defining the criteria for determining judicial investigation situations are studied. Situations occurring during the prejudicial inquiry and legal proceedings have same epistemological nature, which allows to successfully apply the existing classification base to systematize and order the situations of judicial investigation. The author distinguishes the judicial problem-searching situations, occurring in the courts of original jurisdiction, of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority, differing in the character of problem raised and solved by the court. The typical situation in the courts of original jurisdiction is collecting evidence sufficient for making judicial decision. The typical situation in the courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority is validating decisions made by the court of original jurisdiction. The difference in the line of development of typical judicial investigation situations and search and cognitive activity’s character is shown. The author distinguishes typical problem-searching judicial situations, occurring in the court of original jurisdiction, connected with: 1) saving the evidence seized during prejudicial inquiry; 2) filling the gaps in prejudicial inquiry materials; 3) providing judicial assessment of evidence; 4) making judicial decision. The court of original jurisdiction adjudicates in a case, courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority review the judicial decision (their revision activity is provided with search and cognitive means to a lesser extent). The most widespread problem-searching judicial situations in the court of appellate jurisdiction are distinguished. The information uncertainty in mentioned situations cannot be overcome by cognitive means of such courts. classification criteria judicial investigation situation problem-searching judicial investigation situation Private international law. Conflict of laws Kuznetsova S.M. verfasserin aut In Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation, 2015 (2014), 4(30), Seite 156-162 (DE-627)1760623334 19986963 nnns year:2014 number:4(30) pages:156-162 https://doaj.org/article/868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 kostenfrei http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/voronin_kuznetsova.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1998-6963 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2014 4(30) 156-162 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ073516813 (DE-599)DOAJ868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng rus K7000-7720 Voronin S.E. verfasserin aut Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics 2014 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The problems of defining the criteria for determining judicial investigation situations are studied. Situations occurring during the prejudicial inquiry and legal proceedings have same epistemological nature, which allows to successfully apply the existing classification base to systematize and order the situations of judicial investigation. The author distinguishes the judicial problem-searching situations, occurring in the courts of original jurisdiction, of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority, differing in the character of problem raised and solved by the court. The typical situation in the courts of original jurisdiction is collecting evidence sufficient for making judicial decision. The typical situation in the courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority is validating decisions made by the court of original jurisdiction. The difference in the line of development of typical judicial investigation situations and search and cognitive activity’s character is shown. The author distinguishes typical problem-searching judicial situations, occurring in the court of original jurisdiction, connected with: 1) saving the evidence seized during prejudicial inquiry; 2) filling the gaps in prejudicial inquiry materials; 3) providing judicial assessment of evidence; 4) making judicial decision. The court of original jurisdiction adjudicates in a case, courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority review the judicial decision (their revision activity is provided with search and cognitive means to a lesser extent). The most widespread problem-searching judicial situations in the court of appellate jurisdiction are distinguished. The information uncertainty in mentioned situations cannot be overcome by cognitive means of such courts. classification criteria judicial investigation situation problem-searching judicial investigation situation Private international law. Conflict of laws Kuznetsova S.M. verfasserin aut In Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation, 2015 (2014), 4(30), Seite 156-162 (DE-627)1760623334 19986963 nnns year:2014 number:4(30) pages:156-162 https://doaj.org/article/868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 kostenfrei http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/voronin_kuznetsova.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1998-6963 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 2014 4(30) 156-162 |
| language |
English Russian |
| source |
In Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika (2014), 4(30), Seite 156-162 year:2014 number:4(30) pages:156-162 |
| sourceStr |
In Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika (2014), 4(30), Seite 156-162 year:2014 number:4(30) pages:156-162 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
classification criteria judicial investigation situation problem-searching judicial investigation situation Private international law. Conflict of laws |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Voronin S.E. @@aut@@ Kuznetsova S.M. @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760623334 |
| id |
DOAJ073516813 |
| language_de |
englisch russisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ073516813</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309115426.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ073516813</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K7000-7720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Voronin S.E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The problems of defining the criteria for determining judicial investigation situations are studied. Situations occurring during the prejudicial inquiry and legal proceedings have same epistemological nature, which allows to successfully apply the existing classification base to systematize and order the situations of judicial investigation. The author distinguishes the judicial problem-searching situations, occurring in the courts of original jurisdiction, of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority, differing in the character of problem raised and solved by the court. The typical situation in the courts of original jurisdiction is collecting evidence sufficient for making judicial decision. The typical situation in the courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority is validating decisions made by the court of original jurisdiction. The difference in the line of development of typical judicial investigation situations and search and cognitive activity’s character is shown. The author distinguishes typical problem-searching judicial situations, occurring in the court of original jurisdiction, connected with: 1) saving the evidence seized during prejudicial inquiry; 2) filling the gaps in prejudicial inquiry materials; 3) providing judicial assessment of evidence; 4) making judicial decision. The court of original jurisdiction adjudicates in a case, courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority review the judicial decision (their revision activity is provided with search and cognitive means to a lesser extent). The most widespread problem-searching judicial situations in the court of appellate jurisdiction are distinguished. The information uncertainty in mentioned situations cannot be overcome by cognitive means of such courts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">classification criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">judicial investigation situation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">problem-searching judicial investigation situation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Private international law. Conflict of laws</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kuznetsova S.M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika</subfield><subfield code="d">Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">(2014), 4(30), Seite 156-162</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760623334</subfield><subfield code="x">19986963</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4(30)</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:156-162</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/voronin_kuznetsova.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1998-6963</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">4(30)</subfield><subfield code="h">156-162</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
K - Law |
| author |
Voronin S.E. |
| spellingShingle |
Voronin S.E. misc K7000-7720 misc classification criteria misc judicial investigation situation misc problem-searching judicial investigation situation misc Private international law. Conflict of laws Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics |
| authorStr |
Voronin S.E. |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760623334 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
K7000-7720 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
19986963 |
| topic_title |
K7000-7720 Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics classification criteria judicial investigation situation problem-searching judicial investigation situation |
| topic |
misc K7000-7720 misc classification criteria misc judicial investigation situation misc problem-searching judicial investigation situation misc Private international law. Conflict of laws |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc K7000-7720 misc classification criteria misc judicial investigation situation misc problem-searching judicial investigation situation misc Private international law. Conflict of laws |
| topic_browse |
misc K7000-7720 misc classification criteria misc judicial investigation situation misc problem-searching judicial investigation situation misc Private international law. Conflict of laws |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760623334 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760623334 |
| title |
Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ073516813 (DE-599)DOAJ868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 |
| title_full |
Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics |
| author_sort |
Voronin S.E. |
| journal |
Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika |
| journalStr |
Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika |
| callnumber-first-code |
K |
| lang_code |
eng rus |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2014 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
156 |
| author_browse |
Voronin S.E. Kuznetsova S.M. |
| class |
K7000-7720 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Voronin S.E. |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics |
| callnumber |
K7000-7720 |
| title_auth |
Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics |
| abstract |
The problems of defining the criteria for determining judicial investigation situations are studied. Situations occurring during the prejudicial inquiry and legal proceedings have same epistemological nature, which allows to successfully apply the existing classification base to systematize and order the situations of judicial investigation. The author distinguishes the judicial problem-searching situations, occurring in the courts of original jurisdiction, of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority, differing in the character of problem raised and solved by the court. The typical situation in the courts of original jurisdiction is collecting evidence sufficient for making judicial decision. The typical situation in the courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority is validating decisions made by the court of original jurisdiction. The difference in the line of development of typical judicial investigation situations and search and cognitive activity’s character is shown. The author distinguishes typical problem-searching judicial situations, occurring in the court of original jurisdiction, connected with: 1) saving the evidence seized during prejudicial inquiry; 2) filling the gaps in prejudicial inquiry materials; 3) providing judicial assessment of evidence; 4) making judicial decision. The court of original jurisdiction adjudicates in a case, courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority review the judicial decision (their revision activity is provided with search and cognitive means to a lesser extent). The most widespread problem-searching judicial situations in the court of appellate jurisdiction are distinguished. The information uncertainty in mentioned situations cannot be overcome by cognitive means of such courts. |
| abstractGer |
The problems of defining the criteria for determining judicial investigation situations are studied. Situations occurring during the prejudicial inquiry and legal proceedings have same epistemological nature, which allows to successfully apply the existing classification base to systematize and order the situations of judicial investigation. The author distinguishes the judicial problem-searching situations, occurring in the courts of original jurisdiction, of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority, differing in the character of problem raised and solved by the court. The typical situation in the courts of original jurisdiction is collecting evidence sufficient for making judicial decision. The typical situation in the courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority is validating decisions made by the court of original jurisdiction. The difference in the line of development of typical judicial investigation situations and search and cognitive activity’s character is shown. The author distinguishes typical problem-searching judicial situations, occurring in the court of original jurisdiction, connected with: 1) saving the evidence seized during prejudicial inquiry; 2) filling the gaps in prejudicial inquiry materials; 3) providing judicial assessment of evidence; 4) making judicial decision. The court of original jurisdiction adjudicates in a case, courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority review the judicial decision (their revision activity is provided with search and cognitive means to a lesser extent). The most widespread problem-searching judicial situations in the court of appellate jurisdiction are distinguished. The information uncertainty in mentioned situations cannot be overcome by cognitive means of such courts. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
The problems of defining the criteria for determining judicial investigation situations are studied. Situations occurring during the prejudicial inquiry and legal proceedings have same epistemological nature, which allows to successfully apply the existing classification base to systematize and order the situations of judicial investigation. The author distinguishes the judicial problem-searching situations, occurring in the courts of original jurisdiction, of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority, differing in the character of problem raised and solved by the court. The typical situation in the courts of original jurisdiction is collecting evidence sufficient for making judicial decision. The typical situation in the courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority is validating decisions made by the court of original jurisdiction. The difference in the line of development of typical judicial investigation situations and search and cognitive activity’s character is shown. The author distinguishes typical problem-searching judicial situations, occurring in the court of original jurisdiction, connected with: 1) saving the evidence seized during prejudicial inquiry; 2) filling the gaps in prejudicial inquiry materials; 3) providing judicial assessment of evidence; 4) making judicial decision. The court of original jurisdiction adjudicates in a case, courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority review the judicial decision (their revision activity is provided with search and cognitive means to a lesser extent). The most widespread problem-searching judicial situations in the court of appellate jurisdiction are distinguished. The information uncertainty in mentioned situations cannot be overcome by cognitive means of such courts. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
4(30) |
| title_short |
Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2 http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/voronin_kuznetsova.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1998-6963 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Kuznetsova S.M. |
| author2Str |
Kuznetsova S.M. |
| ppnlink |
1760623334 |
| callnumber-subject |
K - General Law |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| callnumber-a |
K7000-7720 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T18:07:41.972Z |
| _version_ |
1803582242265497600 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ073516813</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309115426.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ073516813</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K7000-7720</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Voronin S.E.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Classification of judicial investigation situations and its importance for criminalistic tactics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The problems of defining the criteria for determining judicial investigation situations are studied. Situations occurring during the prejudicial inquiry and legal proceedings have same epistemological nature, which allows to successfully apply the existing classification base to systematize and order the situations of judicial investigation. The author distinguishes the judicial problem-searching situations, occurring in the courts of original jurisdiction, of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority, differing in the character of problem raised and solved by the court. The typical situation in the courts of original jurisdiction is collecting evidence sufficient for making judicial decision. The typical situation in the courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority is validating decisions made by the court of original jurisdiction. The difference in the line of development of typical judicial investigation situations and search and cognitive activity’s character is shown. The author distinguishes typical problem-searching judicial situations, occurring in the court of original jurisdiction, connected with: 1) saving the evidence seized during prejudicial inquiry; 2) filling the gaps in prejudicial inquiry materials; 3) providing judicial assessment of evidence; 4) making judicial decision. The court of original jurisdiction adjudicates in a case, courts of appellate jurisdiction, of review and of reviewing authority review the judicial decision (their revision activity is provided with search and cognitive means to a lesser extent). The most widespread problem-searching judicial situations in the court of appellate jurisdiction are distinguished. The information uncertainty in mentioned situations cannot be overcome by cognitive means of such courts.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">classification criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">judicial investigation situation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">problem-searching judicial investigation situation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Private international law. Conflict of laws</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kuznetsova S.M.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Uridičeskaâ Nauka i Pravoohranitelʹnaâ Praktika</subfield><subfield code="d">Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">(2014), 4(30), Seite 156-162</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760623334</subfield><subfield code="x">19986963</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">year:2014</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4(30)</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:156-162</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/868978069f1740439527c5e142dac6a2</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://naukatipk.ru/images/2014/4/voronin_kuznetsova.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1998-6963</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="j">2014</subfield><subfield code="e">4(30)</subfield><subfield code="h">156-162</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4000835 |