Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology
The paper emphasizes an important role of personality assessment in clinical psychology, leading theoretical and methodological perspectives, as well as the need for integrating different concepts and methods in personality assessment. Personality assessment in clinical psychology represents methodo...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Autor*in: |
Emil Benedik [verfasserIn] |
---|
Format: |
E-Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache: |
Englisch ; Slowenisch |
Erschienen: |
2010 |
---|
Schlagwörter: |
---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Psihološka Obzorja - Slovenian Psychologists' Association, 2016, 19(2010), 2, Seite 107-128 |
---|---|
Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:19 ; year:2010 ; number:2 ; pages:107-128 |
Links: |
---|
Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ074133470 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ074133470 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230502141111.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230228s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ074133470 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJbeeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng |a slv | ||
050 | 0 | |a BF1-990 | |
100 | 0 | |a Emil Benedik |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology |
264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The paper emphasizes an important role of personality assessment in clinical psychology, leading theoretical and methodological perspectives, as well as the need for integrating different concepts and methods in personality assessment. Personality assessment in clinical psychology represents methodological frame for better understanding and treatment of psychological (mental) disorders. Two principles for personality assessment prevail: one is based on psychological concepts of personality and statistical methodology, and the other relies on findings from clinical practice (clinical psychology, psychiatry and related fields). Since we do not yet have a generally accepted paradigm of personality assessment, clinical psychology needs unified concepts and methodology for personality assessment. Several authors have attempted to integrate and unify psychological concepts and methodology of assessment in the last decade. This is the path to development of clinical psychology and psychological science in general. | ||
650 | 4 | |a clinical psychology | |
650 | 4 | |a clinical psychological testing | |
650 | 4 | |a personality assessment | |
653 | 0 | |a Psychology | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Psihološka Obzorja |d Slovenian Psychologists' Association, 2016 |g 19(2010), 2, Seite 107-128 |w (DE-627)1760615781 |x 23505141 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2010 |g number:2 |g pages:107-128 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/beeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://psiholoska-obzorja.si/arhiv_clanki/2010_2/benedik.pdf |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2350-5141 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 19 |j 2010 |e 2 |h 107-128 |
author_variant |
e b eb |
---|---|
matchkey_str |
article:23505141:2010----::hoeiafudtosfesnltassmnic |
hierarchy_sort_str |
2010 |
callnumber-subject-code |
BF |
publishDate |
2010 |
allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ074133470 (DE-599)DOAJbeeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng slv BF1-990 Emil Benedik verfasserin aut Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper emphasizes an important role of personality assessment in clinical psychology, leading theoretical and methodological perspectives, as well as the need for integrating different concepts and methods in personality assessment. Personality assessment in clinical psychology represents methodological frame for better understanding and treatment of psychological (mental) disorders. Two principles for personality assessment prevail: one is based on psychological concepts of personality and statistical methodology, and the other relies on findings from clinical practice (clinical psychology, psychiatry and related fields). Since we do not yet have a generally accepted paradigm of personality assessment, clinical psychology needs unified concepts and methodology for personality assessment. Several authors have attempted to integrate and unify psychological concepts and methodology of assessment in the last decade. This is the path to development of clinical psychology and psychological science in general. clinical psychology clinical psychological testing personality assessment Psychology In Psihološka Obzorja Slovenian Psychologists' Association, 2016 19(2010), 2, Seite 107-128 (DE-627)1760615781 23505141 nnns volume:19 year:2010 number:2 pages:107-128 https://doaj.org/article/beeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b kostenfrei http://psiholoska-obzorja.si/arhiv_clanki/2010_2/benedik.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2350-5141 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 19 2010 2 107-128 |
spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ074133470 (DE-599)DOAJbeeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng slv BF1-990 Emil Benedik verfasserin aut Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper emphasizes an important role of personality assessment in clinical psychology, leading theoretical and methodological perspectives, as well as the need for integrating different concepts and methods in personality assessment. Personality assessment in clinical psychology represents methodological frame for better understanding and treatment of psychological (mental) disorders. Two principles for personality assessment prevail: one is based on psychological concepts of personality and statistical methodology, and the other relies on findings from clinical practice (clinical psychology, psychiatry and related fields). Since we do not yet have a generally accepted paradigm of personality assessment, clinical psychology needs unified concepts and methodology for personality assessment. Several authors have attempted to integrate and unify psychological concepts and methodology of assessment in the last decade. This is the path to development of clinical psychology and psychological science in general. clinical psychology clinical psychological testing personality assessment Psychology In Psihološka Obzorja Slovenian Psychologists' Association, 2016 19(2010), 2, Seite 107-128 (DE-627)1760615781 23505141 nnns volume:19 year:2010 number:2 pages:107-128 https://doaj.org/article/beeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b kostenfrei http://psiholoska-obzorja.si/arhiv_clanki/2010_2/benedik.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2350-5141 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 19 2010 2 107-128 |
allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ074133470 (DE-599)DOAJbeeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng slv BF1-990 Emil Benedik verfasserin aut Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper emphasizes an important role of personality assessment in clinical psychology, leading theoretical and methodological perspectives, as well as the need for integrating different concepts and methods in personality assessment. Personality assessment in clinical psychology represents methodological frame for better understanding and treatment of psychological (mental) disorders. Two principles for personality assessment prevail: one is based on psychological concepts of personality and statistical methodology, and the other relies on findings from clinical practice (clinical psychology, psychiatry and related fields). Since we do not yet have a generally accepted paradigm of personality assessment, clinical psychology needs unified concepts and methodology for personality assessment. Several authors have attempted to integrate and unify psychological concepts and methodology of assessment in the last decade. This is the path to development of clinical psychology and psychological science in general. clinical psychology clinical psychological testing personality assessment Psychology In Psihološka Obzorja Slovenian Psychologists' Association, 2016 19(2010), 2, Seite 107-128 (DE-627)1760615781 23505141 nnns volume:19 year:2010 number:2 pages:107-128 https://doaj.org/article/beeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b kostenfrei http://psiholoska-obzorja.si/arhiv_clanki/2010_2/benedik.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2350-5141 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 19 2010 2 107-128 |
allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ074133470 (DE-599)DOAJbeeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng slv BF1-990 Emil Benedik verfasserin aut Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper emphasizes an important role of personality assessment in clinical psychology, leading theoretical and methodological perspectives, as well as the need for integrating different concepts and methods in personality assessment. Personality assessment in clinical psychology represents methodological frame for better understanding and treatment of psychological (mental) disorders. Two principles for personality assessment prevail: one is based on psychological concepts of personality and statistical methodology, and the other relies on findings from clinical practice (clinical psychology, psychiatry and related fields). Since we do not yet have a generally accepted paradigm of personality assessment, clinical psychology needs unified concepts and methodology for personality assessment. Several authors have attempted to integrate and unify psychological concepts and methodology of assessment in the last decade. This is the path to development of clinical psychology and psychological science in general. clinical psychology clinical psychological testing personality assessment Psychology In Psihološka Obzorja Slovenian Psychologists' Association, 2016 19(2010), 2, Seite 107-128 (DE-627)1760615781 23505141 nnns volume:19 year:2010 number:2 pages:107-128 https://doaj.org/article/beeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b kostenfrei http://psiholoska-obzorja.si/arhiv_clanki/2010_2/benedik.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2350-5141 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 19 2010 2 107-128 |
allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ074133470 (DE-599)DOAJbeeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng slv BF1-990 Emil Benedik verfasserin aut Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology 2010 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The paper emphasizes an important role of personality assessment in clinical psychology, leading theoretical and methodological perspectives, as well as the need for integrating different concepts and methods in personality assessment. Personality assessment in clinical psychology represents methodological frame for better understanding and treatment of psychological (mental) disorders. Two principles for personality assessment prevail: one is based on psychological concepts of personality and statistical methodology, and the other relies on findings from clinical practice (clinical psychology, psychiatry and related fields). Since we do not yet have a generally accepted paradigm of personality assessment, clinical psychology needs unified concepts and methodology for personality assessment. Several authors have attempted to integrate and unify psychological concepts and methodology of assessment in the last decade. This is the path to development of clinical psychology and psychological science in general. clinical psychology clinical psychological testing personality assessment Psychology In Psihološka Obzorja Slovenian Psychologists' Association, 2016 19(2010), 2, Seite 107-128 (DE-627)1760615781 23505141 nnns volume:19 year:2010 number:2 pages:107-128 https://doaj.org/article/beeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b kostenfrei http://psiholoska-obzorja.si/arhiv_clanki/2010_2/benedik.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2350-5141 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA AR 19 2010 2 107-128 |
language |
English Slovenian |
source |
In Psihološka Obzorja 19(2010), 2, Seite 107-128 volume:19 year:2010 number:2 pages:107-128 |
sourceStr |
In Psihološka Obzorja 19(2010), 2, Seite 107-128 volume:19 year:2010 number:2 pages:107-128 |
format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
institution |
findex.gbv.de |
topic_facet |
clinical psychology clinical psychological testing personality assessment Psychology |
isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
container_title |
Psihološka Obzorja |
authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Emil Benedik @@aut@@ |
publishDateDaySort_date |
2010-01-01T00:00:00Z |
hierarchy_top_id |
1760615781 |
id |
DOAJ074133470 |
language_de |
englisch slowenisch |
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ074133470</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502141111.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ074133470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbeeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">slv</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BF1-990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emil Benedik</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The paper emphasizes an important role of personality assessment in clinical psychology, leading theoretical and methodological perspectives, as well as the need for integrating different concepts and methods in personality assessment. Personality assessment in clinical psychology represents methodological frame for better understanding and treatment of psychological (mental) disorders. Two principles for personality assessment prevail: one is based on psychological concepts of personality and statistical methodology, and the other relies on findings from clinical practice (clinical psychology, psychiatry and related fields). Since we do not yet have a generally accepted paradigm of personality assessment, clinical psychology needs unified concepts and methodology for personality assessment. Several authors have attempted to integrate and unify psychological concepts and methodology of assessment in the last decade. This is the path to development of clinical psychology and psychological science in general.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical psychological testing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">personality assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Psihološka Obzorja</subfield><subfield code="d">Slovenian Psychologists' Association, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2010), 2, Seite 107-128</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760615781</subfield><subfield code="x">23505141</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:107-128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/beeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://psiholoska-obzorja.si/arhiv_clanki/2010_2/benedik.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2350-5141</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">107-128</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
callnumber-first |
B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
author |
Emil Benedik |
spellingShingle |
Emil Benedik misc BF1-990 misc clinical psychology misc clinical psychological testing misc personality assessment misc Psychology Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology |
authorStr |
Emil Benedik |
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760615781 |
format |
electronic Article |
delete_txt_mv |
keep |
author_role |
aut |
collection |
DOAJ |
remote_str |
true |
callnumber-label |
BF1-990 |
illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
issn |
23505141 |
topic_title |
BF1-990 Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology clinical psychology clinical psychological testing personality assessment |
topic |
misc BF1-990 misc clinical psychology misc clinical psychological testing misc personality assessment misc Psychology |
topic_unstemmed |
misc BF1-990 misc clinical psychology misc clinical psychological testing misc personality assessment misc Psychology |
topic_browse |
misc BF1-990 misc clinical psychology misc clinical psychological testing misc personality assessment misc Psychology |
format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
hierarchy_parent_title |
Psihološka Obzorja |
hierarchy_parent_id |
1760615781 |
hierarchy_top_title |
Psihološka Obzorja |
isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760615781 |
title |
Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology |
ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ074133470 (DE-599)DOAJbeeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b |
title_full |
Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology |
author_sort |
Emil Benedik |
journal |
Psihološka Obzorja |
journalStr |
Psihološka Obzorja |
callnumber-first-code |
B |
lang_code |
eng slv |
isOA_bool |
true |
recordtype |
marc |
publishDateSort |
2010 |
contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
container_start_page |
107 |
author_browse |
Emil Benedik |
container_volume |
19 |
class |
BF1-990 |
format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
author-letter |
Emil Benedik |
title_sort |
theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology |
callnumber |
BF1-990 |
title_auth |
Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology |
abstract |
The paper emphasizes an important role of personality assessment in clinical psychology, leading theoretical and methodological perspectives, as well as the need for integrating different concepts and methods in personality assessment. Personality assessment in clinical psychology represents methodological frame for better understanding and treatment of psychological (mental) disorders. Two principles for personality assessment prevail: one is based on psychological concepts of personality and statistical methodology, and the other relies on findings from clinical practice (clinical psychology, psychiatry and related fields). Since we do not yet have a generally accepted paradigm of personality assessment, clinical psychology needs unified concepts and methodology for personality assessment. Several authors have attempted to integrate and unify psychological concepts and methodology of assessment in the last decade. This is the path to development of clinical psychology and psychological science in general. |
abstractGer |
The paper emphasizes an important role of personality assessment in clinical psychology, leading theoretical and methodological perspectives, as well as the need for integrating different concepts and methods in personality assessment. Personality assessment in clinical psychology represents methodological frame for better understanding and treatment of psychological (mental) disorders. Two principles for personality assessment prevail: one is based on psychological concepts of personality and statistical methodology, and the other relies on findings from clinical practice (clinical psychology, psychiatry and related fields). Since we do not yet have a generally accepted paradigm of personality assessment, clinical psychology needs unified concepts and methodology for personality assessment. Several authors have attempted to integrate and unify psychological concepts and methodology of assessment in the last decade. This is the path to development of clinical psychology and psychological science in general. |
abstract_unstemmed |
The paper emphasizes an important role of personality assessment in clinical psychology, leading theoretical and methodological perspectives, as well as the need for integrating different concepts and methods in personality assessment. Personality assessment in clinical psychology represents methodological frame for better understanding and treatment of psychological (mental) disorders. Two principles for personality assessment prevail: one is based on psychological concepts of personality and statistical methodology, and the other relies on findings from clinical practice (clinical psychology, psychiatry and related fields). Since we do not yet have a generally accepted paradigm of personality assessment, clinical psychology needs unified concepts and methodology for personality assessment. Several authors have attempted to integrate and unify psychological concepts and methodology of assessment in the last decade. This is the path to development of clinical psychology and psychological science in general. |
collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA |
container_issue |
2 |
title_short |
Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/beeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b http://psiholoska-obzorja.si/arhiv_clanki/2010_2/benedik.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2350-5141 |
remote_bool |
true |
ppnlink |
1760615781 |
callnumber-subject |
BF - Psychology |
mediatype_str_mv |
c |
isOA_txt |
true |
hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
callnumber-a |
BF1-990 |
up_date |
2024-07-03T21:30:59.062Z |
_version_ |
1803595031838195713 |
fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ074133470</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230502141111.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ074133470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJbeeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">slv</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BF1-990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emil Benedik</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Theoretical foundations of personality assessment in clinical psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The paper emphasizes an important role of personality assessment in clinical psychology, leading theoretical and methodological perspectives, as well as the need for integrating different concepts and methods in personality assessment. Personality assessment in clinical psychology represents methodological frame for better understanding and treatment of psychological (mental) disorders. Two principles for personality assessment prevail: one is based on psychological concepts of personality and statistical methodology, and the other relies on findings from clinical practice (clinical psychology, psychiatry and related fields). Since we do not yet have a generally accepted paradigm of personality assessment, clinical psychology needs unified concepts and methodology for personality assessment. Several authors have attempted to integrate and unify psychological concepts and methodology of assessment in the last decade. This is the path to development of clinical psychology and psychological science in general.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">clinical psychological testing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">personality assessment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Psihološka Obzorja</subfield><subfield code="d">Slovenian Psychologists' Association, 2016</subfield><subfield code="g">19(2010), 2, Seite 107-128</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760615781</subfield><subfield code="x">23505141</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:19</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2010</subfield><subfield code="g">number:2</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:107-128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/beeff3b04a374571937ec10638b7de7b</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://psiholoska-obzorja.si/arhiv_clanki/2010_2/benedik.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2350-5141</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">19</subfield><subfield code="j">2010</subfield><subfield code="e">2</subfield><subfield code="h">107-128</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
score |
7.3994884 |