Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping

The effect of intercropping on plant water status, gas exchange and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. Centralmex, and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) cv. Pitiuba were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at the Embrapa-Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido (CPATSA) at Petr...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch ; Spanisch ; Portugiesisch

Erschienen:	2000

Schlagwörter:	plant soil relations plant water relations gas exchange cropping systems

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira - Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004, 35(2000), 5, Seite 915-921
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:35 ; year:2000 ; number:5 ; pages:915-921

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc

DOI / URN:	10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ074508865

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ074508865
003	DE-627
005	20230503094337.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2000 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
024	7		\|a 10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 \|2 doi
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ074508865
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng \|a spa \|a por
050		0	\|a S1-972
100	0		\|a JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping
264		1	\|c 2000
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The effect of intercropping on plant water status, gas exchange and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. Centralmex, and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) cv. Pitiuba were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at the Embrapa-Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido (CPATSA) at Petrolina, PE, Brazil. The treatments were: maize and cowpea as sole crops, at a population of 40,000 plants ha-1, and intercropped at a population of 20,000 plants ha-1. The results obtained in this paper appear to be related to the degree of competition experienced by the components, mainly for water and light. Maize intercropped had higher values of leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than as sole crop. Intercropped cowpea had higher values of leaf water potential but lower stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than sole cowpea. Maize productivity increased 18% in relation to sole crop whereas a 5% decrease was observed with cowpea. Despite these facts the Land Equivalent Ratio obtained was 1.13 indicating intercropping advantage over the sole system. The higher partial Land Equivalent Ratio observed for maize suggests that this specie was the main component influencing the final productivity of the intercropping system studied.
650		4	\|a plant soil relations
650		4	\|a plant water relations
650		4	\|a gas exchange
650		4	\|a cropping systems
653		0	\|a Agriculture (General)
773	0	8	\|i In \|t Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira \|d Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 \|g 35(2000), 5, Seite 915-921 \|w (DE-627)331758326 \|w (DE-600)2053197-7 \|x 16783921 \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:35 \|g year:2000 \|g number:5 \|g pages:915-921
856	4	0	\|u https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2000000500008&tlng=en \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v35n5/4712.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 35 \|j 2000 \|e 5 \|h 915-921

Indexfelder

author_variant	j m p l f jmplf
matchkey_str	article:16783921:2000----::hsooiarsossfazadopa
hierarchy_sort_str	2000
callnumber-subject-code	S
publishDate	2000
allfields	10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 doi (DE-627)DOAJ074508865 (DE-599)DOAJ94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO verfasserin aut Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping 2000 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The effect of intercropping on plant water status, gas exchange and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. Centralmex, and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) cv. Pitiuba were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at the Embrapa-Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido (CPATSA) at Petrolina, PE, Brazil. The treatments were: maize and cowpea as sole crops, at a population of 40,000 plants ha-1, and intercropped at a population of 20,000 plants ha-1. The results obtained in this paper appear to be related to the degree of competition experienced by the components, mainly for water and light. Maize intercropped had higher values of leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than as sole crop. Intercropped cowpea had higher values of leaf water potential but lower stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than sole cowpea. Maize productivity increased 18% in relation to sole crop whereas a 5% decrease was observed with cowpea. Despite these facts the Land Equivalent Ratio obtained was 1.13 indicating intercropping advantage over the sole system. The higher partial Land Equivalent Ratio observed for maize suggests that this specie was the main component influencing the final productivity of the intercropping system studied. plant soil relations plant water relations gas exchange cropping systems Agriculture (General) In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 35(2000), 5, Seite 915-921 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:35 year:2000 number:5 pages:915-921 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2000000500008&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v35n5/4712.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 35 2000 5 915-921
spelling	10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 doi (DE-627)DOAJ074508865 (DE-599)DOAJ94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO verfasserin aut Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping 2000 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The effect of intercropping on plant water status, gas exchange and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. Centralmex, and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) cv. Pitiuba were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at the Embrapa-Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido (CPATSA) at Petrolina, PE, Brazil. The treatments were: maize and cowpea as sole crops, at a population of 40,000 plants ha-1, and intercropped at a population of 20,000 plants ha-1. The results obtained in this paper appear to be related to the degree of competition experienced by the components, mainly for water and light. Maize intercropped had higher values of leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than as sole crop. Intercropped cowpea had higher values of leaf water potential but lower stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than sole cowpea. Maize productivity increased 18% in relation to sole crop whereas a 5% decrease was observed with cowpea. Despite these facts the Land Equivalent Ratio obtained was 1.13 indicating intercropping advantage over the sole system. The higher partial Land Equivalent Ratio observed for maize suggests that this specie was the main component influencing the final productivity of the intercropping system studied. plant soil relations plant water relations gas exchange cropping systems Agriculture (General) In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 35(2000), 5, Seite 915-921 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:35 year:2000 number:5 pages:915-921 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2000000500008&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v35n5/4712.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 35 2000 5 915-921
allfields_unstemmed	10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 doi (DE-627)DOAJ074508865 (DE-599)DOAJ94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO verfasserin aut Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping 2000 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The effect of intercropping on plant water status, gas exchange and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. Centralmex, and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) cv. Pitiuba were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at the Embrapa-Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido (CPATSA) at Petrolina, PE, Brazil. The treatments were: maize and cowpea as sole crops, at a population of 40,000 plants ha-1, and intercropped at a population of 20,000 plants ha-1. The results obtained in this paper appear to be related to the degree of competition experienced by the components, mainly for water and light. Maize intercropped had higher values of leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than as sole crop. Intercropped cowpea had higher values of leaf water potential but lower stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than sole cowpea. Maize productivity increased 18% in relation to sole crop whereas a 5% decrease was observed with cowpea. Despite these facts the Land Equivalent Ratio obtained was 1.13 indicating intercropping advantage over the sole system. The higher partial Land Equivalent Ratio observed for maize suggests that this specie was the main component influencing the final productivity of the intercropping system studied. plant soil relations plant water relations gas exchange cropping systems Agriculture (General) In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 35(2000), 5, Seite 915-921 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:35 year:2000 number:5 pages:915-921 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2000000500008&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v35n5/4712.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 35 2000 5 915-921
allfieldsGer	10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 doi (DE-627)DOAJ074508865 (DE-599)DOAJ94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO verfasserin aut Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping 2000 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The effect of intercropping on plant water status, gas exchange and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. Centralmex, and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) cv. Pitiuba were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at the Embrapa-Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido (CPATSA) at Petrolina, PE, Brazil. The treatments were: maize and cowpea as sole crops, at a population of 40,000 plants ha-1, and intercropped at a population of 20,000 plants ha-1. The results obtained in this paper appear to be related to the degree of competition experienced by the components, mainly for water and light. Maize intercropped had higher values of leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than as sole crop. Intercropped cowpea had higher values of leaf water potential but lower stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than sole cowpea. Maize productivity increased 18% in relation to sole crop whereas a 5% decrease was observed with cowpea. Despite these facts the Land Equivalent Ratio obtained was 1.13 indicating intercropping advantage over the sole system. The higher partial Land Equivalent Ratio observed for maize suggests that this specie was the main component influencing the final productivity of the intercropping system studied. plant soil relations plant water relations gas exchange cropping systems Agriculture (General) In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 35(2000), 5, Seite 915-921 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:35 year:2000 number:5 pages:915-921 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2000000500008&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v35n5/4712.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 35 2000 5 915-921
allfieldsSound	10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 doi (DE-627)DOAJ074508865 (DE-599)DOAJ94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng spa por S1-972 JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO verfasserin aut Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping 2000 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier The effect of intercropping on plant water status, gas exchange and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. Centralmex, and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) cv. Pitiuba were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at the Embrapa-Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido (CPATSA) at Petrolina, PE, Brazil. The treatments were: maize and cowpea as sole crops, at a population of 40,000 plants ha-1, and intercropped at a population of 20,000 plants ha-1. The results obtained in this paper appear to be related to the degree of competition experienced by the components, mainly for water and light. Maize intercropped had higher values of leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than as sole crop. Intercropped cowpea had higher values of leaf water potential but lower stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than sole cowpea. Maize productivity increased 18% in relation to sole crop whereas a 5% decrease was observed with cowpea. Despite these facts the Land Equivalent Ratio obtained was 1.13 indicating intercropping advantage over the sole system. The higher partial Land Equivalent Ratio observed for maize suggests that this specie was the main component influencing the final productivity of the intercropping system studied. plant soil relations plant water relations gas exchange cropping systems Agriculture (General) In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004 35(2000), 5, Seite 915-921 (DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7 16783921 nnns volume:35 year:2000 number:5 pages:915-921 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2000000500008&tlng=en kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v35n5/4712.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 35 2000 5 915-921
language	English Spanish Portuguese
source	In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 35(2000), 5, Seite 915-921 volume:35 year:2000 number:5 pages:915-921
sourceStr	In Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 35(2000), 5, Seite 915-921 volume:35 year:2000 number:5 pages:915-921
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	plant soil relations plant water relations gas exchange cropping systems Agriculture (General)
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
authorswithroles_txt_mv	JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2000-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	331758326
id	DOAJ074508865
language_de	englisch spanisch portugiesisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ074508865</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503094337.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2000 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ074508865</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S1-972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The effect of intercropping on plant water status, gas exchange and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. Centralmex, and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) cv. Pitiuba were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at the Embrapa-Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido (CPATSA) at Petrolina, PE, Brazil. The treatments were: maize and cowpea as sole crops, at a population of 40,000 plants ha-1, and intercropped at a population of 20,000 plants ha-1. The results obtained in this paper appear to be related to the degree of competition experienced by the components, mainly for water and light. Maize intercropped had higher values of leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than as sole crop. Intercropped cowpea had higher values of leaf water potential but lower stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than sole cowpea. Maize productivity increased 18% in relation to sole crop whereas a 5% decrease was observed with cowpea. Despite these facts the Land Equivalent Ratio obtained was 1.13 indicating intercropping advantage over the sole system. The higher partial Land Equivalent Ratio observed for maize suggests that this specie was the main component influencing the final productivity of the intercropping system studied.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">plant soil relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">plant water relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">gas exchange</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cropping systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira</subfield><subfield code="d">Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">35(2000), 5, Seite 915-921</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)331758326</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2053197-7</subfield><subfield code="x">16783921</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:35</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2000</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:915-921</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2000000500008&tlng=en</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v35n5/4712.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">35</subfield><subfield code="j">2000</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">915-921</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
callnumber-first	S - Agriculture
author	JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO
spellingShingle	JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO misc S1-972 misc plant soil relations misc plant water relations misc gas exchange misc cropping systems misc Agriculture (General) Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping
authorStr	JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)331758326
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
callnumber-label	S1-972
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	16783921
topic_title	S1-972 Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping plant soil relations plant water relations gas exchange cropping systems
topic	misc S1-972 misc plant soil relations misc plant water relations misc gas exchange misc cropping systems misc Agriculture (General)
topic_unstemmed	misc S1-972 misc plant soil relations misc plant water relations misc gas exchange misc cropping systems misc Agriculture (General)
topic_browse	misc S1-972 misc plant soil relations misc plant water relations misc gas exchange misc cropping systems misc Agriculture (General)
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
hierarchy_parent_id	331758326
hierarchy_top_title	Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)331758326 (DE-600)2053197-7
title	Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ074508865 (DE-599)DOAJ94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0
title_full	Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping
author_sort	JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO
journal	Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
journalStr	Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
callnumber-first-code	S
lang_code	eng spa por
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2000
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	915
author_browse	JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO
container_volume	35
class	S1-972
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO
doi_str_mv	10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008
title_sort	physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping
callnumber	S1-972
title_auth	Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping
abstract	The effect of intercropping on plant water status, gas exchange and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. Centralmex, and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) cv. Pitiuba were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at the Embrapa-Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido (CPATSA) at Petrolina, PE, Brazil. The treatments were: maize and cowpea as sole crops, at a population of 40,000 plants ha-1, and intercropped at a population of 20,000 plants ha-1. The results obtained in this paper appear to be related to the degree of competition experienced by the components, mainly for water and light. Maize intercropped had higher values of leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than as sole crop. Intercropped cowpea had higher values of leaf water potential but lower stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than sole cowpea. Maize productivity increased 18% in relation to sole crop whereas a 5% decrease was observed with cowpea. Despite these facts the Land Equivalent Ratio obtained was 1.13 indicating intercropping advantage over the sole system. The higher partial Land Equivalent Ratio observed for maize suggests that this specie was the main component influencing the final productivity of the intercropping system studied.
abstractGer	The effect of intercropping on plant water status, gas exchange and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. Centralmex, and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) cv. Pitiuba were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at the Embrapa-Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido (CPATSA) at Petrolina, PE, Brazil. The treatments were: maize and cowpea as sole crops, at a population of 40,000 plants ha-1, and intercropped at a population of 20,000 plants ha-1. The results obtained in this paper appear to be related to the degree of competition experienced by the components, mainly for water and light. Maize intercropped had higher values of leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than as sole crop. Intercropped cowpea had higher values of leaf water potential but lower stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than sole cowpea. Maize productivity increased 18% in relation to sole crop whereas a 5% decrease was observed with cowpea. Despite these facts the Land Equivalent Ratio obtained was 1.13 indicating intercropping advantage over the sole system. The higher partial Land Equivalent Ratio observed for maize suggests that this specie was the main component influencing the final productivity of the intercropping system studied.
abstract_unstemmed	The effect of intercropping on plant water status, gas exchange and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. Centralmex, and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) cv. Pitiuba were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at the Embrapa-Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido (CPATSA) at Petrolina, PE, Brazil. The treatments were: maize and cowpea as sole crops, at a population of 40,000 plants ha-1, and intercropped at a population of 20,000 plants ha-1. The results obtained in this paper appear to be related to the degree of competition experienced by the components, mainly for water and light. Maize intercropped had higher values of leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than as sole crop. Intercropped cowpea had higher values of leaf water potential but lower stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than sole cowpea. Maize productivity increased 18% in relation to sole crop whereas a 5% decrease was observed with cowpea. Despite these facts the Land Equivalent Ratio obtained was 1.13 indicating intercropping advantage over the sole system. The higher partial Land Equivalent Ratio observed for maize suggests that this specie was the main component influencing the final productivity of the intercropping system studied.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_31 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_70 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	5
title_short	Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping
url	https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008 https://doaj.org/article/94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0 http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2000000500008&tlng=en http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v35n5/4712.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921
remote_bool	true
ppnlink	331758326
callnumber-subject	S - General Agriculture
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
doi_str	10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008
callnumber-a	S1-972
up_date	2024-07-03T23:26:41.710Z
_version_	1803602311747993600
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ074508865</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503094337.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2000 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ074508865</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">spa</subfield><subfield code="a">por</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">S1-972</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">JOSÉ MOACIR PINHEIRO LIMA FILHO</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2000</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The effect of intercropping on plant water status, gas exchange and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) cv. Centralmex, and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp)) cv. Pitiuba were evaluated under semi-arid conditions at the Embrapa-Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Semi-Árido (CPATSA) at Petrolina, PE, Brazil. The treatments were: maize and cowpea as sole crops, at a population of 40,000 plants ha-1, and intercropped at a population of 20,000 plants ha-1. The results obtained in this paper appear to be related to the degree of competition experienced by the components, mainly for water and light. Maize intercropped had higher values of leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than as sole crop. Intercropped cowpea had higher values of leaf water potential but lower stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthesis than sole cowpea. Maize productivity increased 18% in relation to sole crop whereas a 5% decrease was observed with cowpea. Despite these facts the Land Equivalent Ratio obtained was 1.13 indicating intercropping advantage over the sole system. The higher partial Land Equivalent Ratio observed for maize suggests that this specie was the main component influencing the final productivity of the intercropping system studied.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">plant soil relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">plant water relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">gas exchange</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cropping systems</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Agriculture (General)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira</subfield><subfield code="d">Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2004</subfield><subfield code="g">35(2000), 5, Seite 915-921</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)331758326</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2053197-7</subfield><subfield code="x">16783921</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:35</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2000</subfield><subfield code="g">number:5</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:915-921</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2000000500008</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/94a49509dc1449a19cdd7cfa83a2e3f0</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-204X2000000500008&tlng=en</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v35n5/4712.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1678-3921</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_31</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_70</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">35</subfield><subfield code="j">2000</subfield><subfield code="e">5</subfield><subfield code="h">915-921</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.399641

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Physiological responses of maize and cowpea to intercropping

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?