Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Behavior Assessment for Children (BAC) in a community of school-aged children in Taiwan. Method: A school-based sample comprising third grade and fourth grade students was recruited from Taichung City in Taiwan. The p...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS [verfasserIn] Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD [verfasserIn] Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc [verfasserIn] Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Asian Nursing Research - Elsevier, 2017, 10(2016), 1, Seite 39-44 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:10 ; year:2016 ; number:1 ; pages:39-44 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ074958593 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ074958593 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230309131322.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ074958593 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJdb8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a RT1-120 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Behavior Assessment for Children (BAC) in a community of school-aged children in Taiwan. Method: A school-based sample comprising third grade and fourth grade students was recruited from Taichung City in Taiwan. The parents (n = 248) and teachers (n = 15) of these students completed structured questionnaires, including the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the proposed BAC. Content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability of the BAC were assessed. Results: The BAC comprised three subscales (attention, emotion, and self-control) that included 17 items. The content validity index (CVI) score was 0.98. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis (goodness of fit = .90, root mean square of residual = .03, root mean square error of approximation = .06, and comparative fit index = .94) supported the construct validity of the three BAC subscales. The concurrent validity of the BAC subscales significantly correlated with the compatible CBCL subscales (r = .59–.78, p < .001). Cronbach α of the subscales of the BAC ranged from .78 to .92. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the parents and teachers ranged from .31 to .44, and the joint probability of agreement ranged from 31.4% to 92.2%. Conclusions: The BAC is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating behavioral problems in school-aged children. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a behavioral problem | |
| 650 | 4 | |a child behavior | |
| 650 | 4 | |a psychometrics | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Nursing | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Asian Nursing Research |d Elsevier, 2017 |g 10(2016), 1, Seite 39-44 |w (DE-627)1760631604 |x 19761317 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2016 |g number:1 |g pages:39-44 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/db8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131716000116 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1976-1317 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 10 |j 2016 |e 1 |h 39-44 | ||
| author_variant |
c r m h l crmh crmhl k r p c p krpc krpcp l r b c y lrbc lrbcy l r p w c lrpw lrpwc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:19761317:2016----::scoercetnobhvoassm |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2016 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
RT |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| allfields |
10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ074958593 (DE-599)DOAJdb8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RT1-120 Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS verfasserin aut Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Behavior Assessment for Children (BAC) in a community of school-aged children in Taiwan. Method: A school-based sample comprising third grade and fourth grade students was recruited from Taichung City in Taiwan. The parents (n = 248) and teachers (n = 15) of these students completed structured questionnaires, including the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the proposed BAC. Content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability of the BAC were assessed. Results: The BAC comprised three subscales (attention, emotion, and self-control) that included 17 items. The content validity index (CVI) score was 0.98. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis (goodness of fit = .90, root mean square of residual = .03, root mean square error of approximation = .06, and comparative fit index = .94) supported the construct validity of the three BAC subscales. The concurrent validity of the BAC subscales significantly correlated with the compatible CBCL subscales (r = .59–.78, p < .001). Cronbach α of the subscales of the BAC ranged from .78 to .92. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the parents and teachers ranged from .31 to .44, and the joint probability of agreement ranged from 31.4% to 92.2%. Conclusions: The BAC is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating behavioral problems in school-aged children. behavioral problem child behavior psychometrics Nursing Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD verfasserin aut Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc verfasserin aut Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD verfasserin aut In Asian Nursing Research Elsevier, 2017 10(2016), 1, Seite 39-44 (DE-627)1760631604 19761317 nnns volume:10 year:2016 number:1 pages:39-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/db8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131716000116 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1976-1317 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 10 2016 1 39-44 |
| spelling |
10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ074958593 (DE-599)DOAJdb8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RT1-120 Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS verfasserin aut Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Behavior Assessment for Children (BAC) in a community of school-aged children in Taiwan. Method: A school-based sample comprising third grade and fourth grade students was recruited from Taichung City in Taiwan. The parents (n = 248) and teachers (n = 15) of these students completed structured questionnaires, including the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the proposed BAC. Content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability of the BAC were assessed. Results: The BAC comprised three subscales (attention, emotion, and self-control) that included 17 items. The content validity index (CVI) score was 0.98. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis (goodness of fit = .90, root mean square of residual = .03, root mean square error of approximation = .06, and comparative fit index = .94) supported the construct validity of the three BAC subscales. The concurrent validity of the BAC subscales significantly correlated with the compatible CBCL subscales (r = .59–.78, p < .001). Cronbach α of the subscales of the BAC ranged from .78 to .92. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the parents and teachers ranged from .31 to .44, and the joint probability of agreement ranged from 31.4% to 92.2%. Conclusions: The BAC is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating behavioral problems in school-aged children. behavioral problem child behavior psychometrics Nursing Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD verfasserin aut Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc verfasserin aut Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD verfasserin aut In Asian Nursing Research Elsevier, 2017 10(2016), 1, Seite 39-44 (DE-627)1760631604 19761317 nnns volume:10 year:2016 number:1 pages:39-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/db8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131716000116 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1976-1317 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 10 2016 1 39-44 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ074958593 (DE-599)DOAJdb8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RT1-120 Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS verfasserin aut Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Behavior Assessment for Children (BAC) in a community of school-aged children in Taiwan. Method: A school-based sample comprising third grade and fourth grade students was recruited from Taichung City in Taiwan. The parents (n = 248) and teachers (n = 15) of these students completed structured questionnaires, including the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the proposed BAC. Content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability of the BAC were assessed. Results: The BAC comprised three subscales (attention, emotion, and self-control) that included 17 items. The content validity index (CVI) score was 0.98. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis (goodness of fit = .90, root mean square of residual = .03, root mean square error of approximation = .06, and comparative fit index = .94) supported the construct validity of the three BAC subscales. The concurrent validity of the BAC subscales significantly correlated with the compatible CBCL subscales (r = .59–.78, p < .001). Cronbach α of the subscales of the BAC ranged from .78 to .92. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the parents and teachers ranged from .31 to .44, and the joint probability of agreement ranged from 31.4% to 92.2%. Conclusions: The BAC is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating behavioral problems in school-aged children. behavioral problem child behavior psychometrics Nursing Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD verfasserin aut Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc verfasserin aut Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD verfasserin aut In Asian Nursing Research Elsevier, 2017 10(2016), 1, Seite 39-44 (DE-627)1760631604 19761317 nnns volume:10 year:2016 number:1 pages:39-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/db8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131716000116 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1976-1317 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 10 2016 1 39-44 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ074958593 (DE-599)DOAJdb8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RT1-120 Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS verfasserin aut Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Behavior Assessment for Children (BAC) in a community of school-aged children in Taiwan. Method: A school-based sample comprising third grade and fourth grade students was recruited from Taichung City in Taiwan. The parents (n = 248) and teachers (n = 15) of these students completed structured questionnaires, including the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the proposed BAC. Content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability of the BAC were assessed. Results: The BAC comprised three subscales (attention, emotion, and self-control) that included 17 items. The content validity index (CVI) score was 0.98. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis (goodness of fit = .90, root mean square of residual = .03, root mean square error of approximation = .06, and comparative fit index = .94) supported the construct validity of the three BAC subscales. The concurrent validity of the BAC subscales significantly correlated with the compatible CBCL subscales (r = .59–.78, p < .001). Cronbach α of the subscales of the BAC ranged from .78 to .92. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the parents and teachers ranged from .31 to .44, and the joint probability of agreement ranged from 31.4% to 92.2%. Conclusions: The BAC is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating behavioral problems in school-aged children. behavioral problem child behavior psychometrics Nursing Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD verfasserin aut Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc verfasserin aut Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD verfasserin aut In Asian Nursing Research Elsevier, 2017 10(2016), 1, Seite 39-44 (DE-627)1760631604 19761317 nnns volume:10 year:2016 number:1 pages:39-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/db8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131716000116 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1976-1317 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 10 2016 1 39-44 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 doi (DE-627)DOAJ074958593 (DE-599)DOAJdb8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng RT1-120 Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS verfasserin aut Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children 2016 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Behavior Assessment for Children (BAC) in a community of school-aged children in Taiwan. Method: A school-based sample comprising third grade and fourth grade students was recruited from Taichung City in Taiwan. The parents (n = 248) and teachers (n = 15) of these students completed structured questionnaires, including the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the proposed BAC. Content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability of the BAC were assessed. Results: The BAC comprised three subscales (attention, emotion, and self-control) that included 17 items. The content validity index (CVI) score was 0.98. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis (goodness of fit = .90, root mean square of residual = .03, root mean square error of approximation = .06, and comparative fit index = .94) supported the construct validity of the three BAC subscales. The concurrent validity of the BAC subscales significantly correlated with the compatible CBCL subscales (r = .59–.78, p < .001). Cronbach α of the subscales of the BAC ranged from .78 to .92. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the parents and teachers ranged from .31 to .44, and the joint probability of agreement ranged from 31.4% to 92.2%. Conclusions: The BAC is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating behavioral problems in school-aged children. behavioral problem child behavior psychometrics Nursing Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD verfasserin aut Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc verfasserin aut Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD verfasserin aut In Asian Nursing Research Elsevier, 2017 10(2016), 1, Seite 39-44 (DE-627)1760631604 19761317 nnns volume:10 year:2016 number:1 pages:39-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/db8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 kostenfrei http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131716000116 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1976-1317 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 10 2016 1 39-44 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Asian Nursing Research 10(2016), 1, Seite 39-44 volume:10 year:2016 number:1 pages:39-44 |
| sourceStr |
In Asian Nursing Research 10(2016), 1, Seite 39-44 volume:10 year:2016 number:1 pages:39-44 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
behavioral problem child behavior psychometrics Nursing |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Asian Nursing Research |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS @@aut@@ Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD @@aut@@ Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc @@aut@@ Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760631604 |
| id |
DOAJ074958593 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ074958593</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309131322.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ074958593</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdb8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RT1-120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Behavior Assessment for Children (BAC) in a community of school-aged children in Taiwan. Method: A school-based sample comprising third grade and fourth grade students was recruited from Taichung City in Taiwan. The parents (n = 248) and teachers (n = 15) of these students completed structured questionnaires, including the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the proposed BAC. Content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability of the BAC were assessed. Results: The BAC comprised three subscales (attention, emotion, and self-control) that included 17 items. The content validity index (CVI) score was 0.98. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis (goodness of fit = .90, root mean square of residual = .03, root mean square error of approximation = .06, and comparative fit index = .94) supported the construct validity of the three BAC subscales. The concurrent validity of the BAC subscales significantly correlated with the compatible CBCL subscales (r = .59–.78, p < .001). Cronbach α of the subscales of the BAC ranged from .78 to .92. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the parents and teachers ranged from .31 to .44, and the joint probability of agreement ranged from 31.4% to 92.2%. Conclusions: The BAC is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating behavioral problems in school-aged children.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">behavioral problem</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">child behavior</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">psychometrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nursing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Asian Nursing Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2016), 1, Seite 39-44</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760631604</subfield><subfield code="x">19761317</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:39-44</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/db8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131716000116</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1976-1317</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">39-44</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
R - Medicine |
| author |
Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS |
| spellingShingle |
Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS misc RT1-120 misc behavioral problem misc child behavior misc psychometrics misc Nursing Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children |
| authorStr |
Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760631604 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
RT1-120 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
19761317 |
| topic_title |
RT1-120 Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children behavioral problem child behavior psychometrics |
| topic |
misc RT1-120 misc behavioral problem misc child behavior misc psychometrics misc Nursing |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc RT1-120 misc behavioral problem misc child behavior misc psychometrics misc Nursing |
| topic_browse |
misc RT1-120 misc behavioral problem misc child behavior misc psychometrics misc Nursing |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Asian Nursing Research |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760631604 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Asian Nursing Research |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760631604 |
| title |
Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ074958593 (DE-599)DOAJdb8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 |
| title_full |
Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children |
| author_sort |
Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS |
| journal |
Asian Nursing Research |
| journalStr |
Asian Nursing Research |
| callnumber-first-code |
R |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2016 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
39 |
| author_browse |
Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD |
| container_volume |
10 |
| class |
RT1-120 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
psychometric testing of behavior assessment for children |
| callnumber |
RT1-120 |
| title_auth |
Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children |
| abstract |
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Behavior Assessment for Children (BAC) in a community of school-aged children in Taiwan. Method: A school-based sample comprising third grade and fourth grade students was recruited from Taichung City in Taiwan. The parents (n = 248) and teachers (n = 15) of these students completed structured questionnaires, including the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the proposed BAC. Content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability of the BAC were assessed. Results: The BAC comprised three subscales (attention, emotion, and self-control) that included 17 items. The content validity index (CVI) score was 0.98. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis (goodness of fit = .90, root mean square of residual = .03, root mean square error of approximation = .06, and comparative fit index = .94) supported the construct validity of the three BAC subscales. The concurrent validity of the BAC subscales significantly correlated with the compatible CBCL subscales (r = .59–.78, p < .001). Cronbach α of the subscales of the BAC ranged from .78 to .92. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the parents and teachers ranged from .31 to .44, and the joint probability of agreement ranged from 31.4% to 92.2%. Conclusions: The BAC is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating behavioral problems in school-aged children. |
| abstractGer |
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Behavior Assessment for Children (BAC) in a community of school-aged children in Taiwan. Method: A school-based sample comprising third grade and fourth grade students was recruited from Taichung City in Taiwan. The parents (n = 248) and teachers (n = 15) of these students completed structured questionnaires, including the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the proposed BAC. Content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability of the BAC were assessed. Results: The BAC comprised three subscales (attention, emotion, and self-control) that included 17 items. The content validity index (CVI) score was 0.98. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis (goodness of fit = .90, root mean square of residual = .03, root mean square error of approximation = .06, and comparative fit index = .94) supported the construct validity of the three BAC subscales. The concurrent validity of the BAC subscales significantly correlated with the compatible CBCL subscales (r = .59–.78, p < .001). Cronbach α of the subscales of the BAC ranged from .78 to .92. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the parents and teachers ranged from .31 to .44, and the joint probability of agreement ranged from 31.4% to 92.2%. Conclusions: The BAC is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating behavioral problems in school-aged children. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Behavior Assessment for Children (BAC) in a community of school-aged children in Taiwan. Method: A school-based sample comprising third grade and fourth grade students was recruited from Taichung City in Taiwan. The parents (n = 248) and teachers (n = 15) of these students completed structured questionnaires, including the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the proposed BAC. Content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability of the BAC were assessed. Results: The BAC comprised three subscales (attention, emotion, and self-control) that included 17 items. The content validity index (CVI) score was 0.98. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis (goodness of fit = .90, root mean square of residual = .03, root mean square error of approximation = .06, and comparative fit index = .94) supported the construct validity of the three BAC subscales. The concurrent validity of the BAC subscales significantly correlated with the compatible CBCL subscales (r = .59–.78, p < .001). Cronbach α of the subscales of the BAC ranged from .78 to .92. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the parents and teachers ranged from .31 to .44, and the joint probability of agreement ranged from 31.4% to 92.2%. Conclusions: The BAC is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating behavioral problems in school-aged children. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 https://doaj.org/article/db8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131716000116 https://doaj.org/toc/1976-1317 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD |
| author2Str |
Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD |
| ppnlink |
1760631604 |
| callnumber-subject |
RT - Nursing |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010 |
| callnumber-a |
RT1-120 |
| up_date |
2024-07-04T01:16:41.113Z |
| _version_ |
1803609231709962240 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ074958593</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309131322.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ074958593</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJdb8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RT1-120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hsiao-Ling Chuang, RN, MS</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Psychometric Testing of Behavior Assessment for Children</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Behavior Assessment for Children (BAC) in a community of school-aged children in Taiwan. Method: A school-based sample comprising third grade and fourth grade students was recruited from Taichung City in Taiwan. The parents (n = 248) and teachers (n = 15) of these students completed structured questionnaires, including the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the proposed BAC. Content validity, concurrent validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability of the BAC were assessed. Results: The BAC comprised three subscales (attention, emotion, and self-control) that included 17 items. The content validity index (CVI) score was 0.98. The result of the confirmatory factor analysis (goodness of fit = .90, root mean square of residual = .03, root mean square error of approximation = .06, and comparative fit index = .94) supported the construct validity of the three BAC subscales. The concurrent validity of the BAC subscales significantly correlated with the compatible CBCL subscales (r = .59–.78, p < .001). Cronbach α of the subscales of the BAC ranged from .78 to .92. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the parents and teachers ranged from .31 to .44, and the joint probability of agreement ranged from 31.4% to 92.2%. Conclusions: The BAC is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating behavioral problems in school-aged children.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">behavioral problem</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">child behavior</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">psychometrics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nursing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ching-Pyng Kuo, RN, PhD</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Chia-Ying Li, RN, BSc</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wen-Chun Liao, RN, PhD</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Asian Nursing Research</subfield><subfield code="d">Elsevier, 2017</subfield><subfield code="g">10(2016), 1, Seite 39-44</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760631604</subfield><subfield code="x">19761317</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:10</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2016</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:39-44</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.010</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/db8d673c96bb4d5a923be5bb4de8b7b3</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131716000116</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1976-1317</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">10</subfield><subfield code="j">2016</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">39-44</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4000597 |