A contemporary vision of project success criteria
Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success. Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Marcela Souto Castro [verfasserIn] Bouchaib Bahli [verfasserIn] José Rodrigues Farias Filho [verfasserIn] Andre Barcaui [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2019 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO), 2019, 16(2019), 1 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:16 ; year:2019 ; number:1 |
| Links: |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ075412241 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ075412241 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230309133851.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ075412241 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a TS155-194 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Marcela Souto Castro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A contemporary vision of project success criteria |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success. Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives of 264 Brazilian project managers and provides a ranking of the most widely used measures in practice in Brazilian organizations. Results: The study analyzes contemporary literature on project success criteria and discusses overlaps and trends. One of the important findings of this research is the identification of mismatches between academic perspectives and those of project managers in regard to project success as well as real success criteria used in organizations. Limitations of the investigation: As the sample covered was comprised exclusively of Brazilian project managers, cross-cultural success criteria research is, therefore, encouraged. Practical implications: The proposed performance criteria can be used in future research and for professional proposes in success criteria assessment. Originality/Value: Given the diversity of success criteria measures, authors can have difficulty in finding the one that better fits their needs; alternatively, they can create their own scale. The reliability of several studies can be questioned due to their subjectivity and, in some cases, weakly defined measures. The present study can therefore provide project professionals with guidelines for success assessment that make measuring and comparing different projects possible. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Project management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a project success | |
| 650 | 4 | |a success criteria | |
| 650 | 4 | |a success measure | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Production management. Operations management | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Bouchaib Bahli |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a José Rodrigues Farias Filho |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Andre Barcaui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management |d Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO), 2019 |g 16(2019), 1 |w (DE-627)1760628972 |x 22378960 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://bjopm.emnuvens.com.br/bjopm/article/view/723 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2237-8960 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_69 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_152 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2009 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2034 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2055 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2108 | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_ILN_2111 | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 2019 |e 1 | ||
| author_variant |
m s c msc b b bb j r f f jrff a b ab |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:22378960:2019----::cneprrvsoopoetu |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2019 |
| callnumber-subject-code |
TS |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| allfields |
10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 doi (DE-627)DOAJ075412241 (DE-599)DOAJ0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TS155-194 Marcela Souto Castro verfasserin aut A contemporary vision of project success criteria 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success. Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives of 264 Brazilian project managers and provides a ranking of the most widely used measures in practice in Brazilian organizations. Results: The study analyzes contemporary literature on project success criteria and discusses overlaps and trends. One of the important findings of this research is the identification of mismatches between academic perspectives and those of project managers in regard to project success as well as real success criteria used in organizations. Limitations of the investigation: As the sample covered was comprised exclusively of Brazilian project managers, cross-cultural success criteria research is, therefore, encouraged. Practical implications: The proposed performance criteria can be used in future research and for professional proposes in success criteria assessment. Originality/Value: Given the diversity of success criteria measures, authors can have difficulty in finding the one that better fits their needs; alternatively, they can create their own scale. The reliability of several studies can be questioned due to their subjectivity and, in some cases, weakly defined measures. The present study can therefore provide project professionals with guidelines for success assessment that make measuring and comparing different projects possible. Project management project success success criteria success measure Production management. Operations management Bouchaib Bahli verfasserin aut José Rodrigues Farias Filho verfasserin aut Andre Barcaui verfasserin aut In Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO), 2019 16(2019), 1 (DE-627)1760628972 22378960 nnns volume:16 year:2019 number:1 https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 kostenfrei https://bjopm.emnuvens.com.br/bjopm/article/view/723 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2237-8960 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 AR 16 2019 1 |
| spelling |
10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 doi (DE-627)DOAJ075412241 (DE-599)DOAJ0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TS155-194 Marcela Souto Castro verfasserin aut A contemporary vision of project success criteria 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success. Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives of 264 Brazilian project managers and provides a ranking of the most widely used measures in practice in Brazilian organizations. Results: The study analyzes contemporary literature on project success criteria and discusses overlaps and trends. One of the important findings of this research is the identification of mismatches between academic perspectives and those of project managers in regard to project success as well as real success criteria used in organizations. Limitations of the investigation: As the sample covered was comprised exclusively of Brazilian project managers, cross-cultural success criteria research is, therefore, encouraged. Practical implications: The proposed performance criteria can be used in future research and for professional proposes in success criteria assessment. Originality/Value: Given the diversity of success criteria measures, authors can have difficulty in finding the one that better fits their needs; alternatively, they can create their own scale. The reliability of several studies can be questioned due to their subjectivity and, in some cases, weakly defined measures. The present study can therefore provide project professionals with guidelines for success assessment that make measuring and comparing different projects possible. Project management project success success criteria success measure Production management. Operations management Bouchaib Bahli verfasserin aut José Rodrigues Farias Filho verfasserin aut Andre Barcaui verfasserin aut In Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO), 2019 16(2019), 1 (DE-627)1760628972 22378960 nnns volume:16 year:2019 number:1 https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 kostenfrei https://bjopm.emnuvens.com.br/bjopm/article/view/723 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2237-8960 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 AR 16 2019 1 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 doi (DE-627)DOAJ075412241 (DE-599)DOAJ0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TS155-194 Marcela Souto Castro verfasserin aut A contemporary vision of project success criteria 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success. Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives of 264 Brazilian project managers and provides a ranking of the most widely used measures in practice in Brazilian organizations. Results: The study analyzes contemporary literature on project success criteria and discusses overlaps and trends. One of the important findings of this research is the identification of mismatches between academic perspectives and those of project managers in regard to project success as well as real success criteria used in organizations. Limitations of the investigation: As the sample covered was comprised exclusively of Brazilian project managers, cross-cultural success criteria research is, therefore, encouraged. Practical implications: The proposed performance criteria can be used in future research and for professional proposes in success criteria assessment. Originality/Value: Given the diversity of success criteria measures, authors can have difficulty in finding the one that better fits their needs; alternatively, they can create their own scale. The reliability of several studies can be questioned due to their subjectivity and, in some cases, weakly defined measures. The present study can therefore provide project professionals with guidelines for success assessment that make measuring and comparing different projects possible. Project management project success success criteria success measure Production management. Operations management Bouchaib Bahli verfasserin aut José Rodrigues Farias Filho verfasserin aut Andre Barcaui verfasserin aut In Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO), 2019 16(2019), 1 (DE-627)1760628972 22378960 nnns volume:16 year:2019 number:1 https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 kostenfrei https://bjopm.emnuvens.com.br/bjopm/article/view/723 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2237-8960 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 AR 16 2019 1 |
| allfieldsGer |
10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 doi (DE-627)DOAJ075412241 (DE-599)DOAJ0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TS155-194 Marcela Souto Castro verfasserin aut A contemporary vision of project success criteria 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success. Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives of 264 Brazilian project managers and provides a ranking of the most widely used measures in practice in Brazilian organizations. Results: The study analyzes contemporary literature on project success criteria and discusses overlaps and trends. One of the important findings of this research is the identification of mismatches between academic perspectives and those of project managers in regard to project success as well as real success criteria used in organizations. Limitations of the investigation: As the sample covered was comprised exclusively of Brazilian project managers, cross-cultural success criteria research is, therefore, encouraged. Practical implications: The proposed performance criteria can be used in future research and for professional proposes in success criteria assessment. Originality/Value: Given the diversity of success criteria measures, authors can have difficulty in finding the one that better fits their needs; alternatively, they can create their own scale. The reliability of several studies can be questioned due to their subjectivity and, in some cases, weakly defined measures. The present study can therefore provide project professionals with guidelines for success assessment that make measuring and comparing different projects possible. Project management project success success criteria success measure Production management. Operations management Bouchaib Bahli verfasserin aut José Rodrigues Farias Filho verfasserin aut Andre Barcaui verfasserin aut In Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO), 2019 16(2019), 1 (DE-627)1760628972 22378960 nnns volume:16 year:2019 number:1 https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 kostenfrei https://bjopm.emnuvens.com.br/bjopm/article/view/723 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2237-8960 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 AR 16 2019 1 |
| allfieldsSound |
10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 doi (DE-627)DOAJ075412241 (DE-599)DOAJ0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng TS155-194 Marcela Souto Castro verfasserin aut A contemporary vision of project success criteria 2019 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success. Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives of 264 Brazilian project managers and provides a ranking of the most widely used measures in practice in Brazilian organizations. Results: The study analyzes contemporary literature on project success criteria and discusses overlaps and trends. One of the important findings of this research is the identification of mismatches between academic perspectives and those of project managers in regard to project success as well as real success criteria used in organizations. Limitations of the investigation: As the sample covered was comprised exclusively of Brazilian project managers, cross-cultural success criteria research is, therefore, encouraged. Practical implications: The proposed performance criteria can be used in future research and for professional proposes in success criteria assessment. Originality/Value: Given the diversity of success criteria measures, authors can have difficulty in finding the one that better fits their needs; alternatively, they can create their own scale. The reliability of several studies can be questioned due to their subjectivity and, in some cases, weakly defined measures. The present study can therefore provide project professionals with guidelines for success assessment that make measuring and comparing different projects possible. Project management project success success criteria success measure Production management. Operations management Bouchaib Bahli verfasserin aut José Rodrigues Farias Filho verfasserin aut Andre Barcaui verfasserin aut In Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO), 2019 16(2019), 1 (DE-627)1760628972 22378960 nnns volume:16 year:2019 number:1 https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 kostenfrei https://bjopm.emnuvens.com.br/bjopm/article/view/723 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2237-8960 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 AR 16 2019 1 |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 16(2019), 1 volume:16 year:2019 number:1 |
| sourceStr |
In Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 16(2019), 1 volume:16 year:2019 number:1 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Project management project success success criteria success measure Production management. Operations management |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Marcela Souto Castro @@aut@@ Bouchaib Bahli @@aut@@ José Rodrigues Farias Filho @@aut@@ Andre Barcaui @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2019-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
1760628972 |
| id |
DOAJ075412241 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ075412241</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309133851.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ075412241</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TS155-194</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marcela Souto Castro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A contemporary vision of project success criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success. Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives of 264 Brazilian project managers and provides a ranking of the most widely used measures in practice in Brazilian organizations. Results: The study analyzes contemporary literature on project success criteria and discusses overlaps and trends. One of the important findings of this research is the identification of mismatches between academic perspectives and those of project managers in regard to project success as well as real success criteria used in organizations. Limitations of the investigation: As the sample covered was comprised exclusively of Brazilian project managers, cross-cultural success criteria research is, therefore, encouraged. Practical implications: The proposed performance criteria can be used in future research and for professional proposes in success criteria assessment. Originality/Value: Given the diversity of success criteria measures, authors can have difficulty in finding the one that better fits their needs; alternatively, they can create their own scale. The reliability of several studies can be questioned due to their subjectivity and, in some cases, weakly defined measures. The present study can therefore provide project professionals with guidelines for success assessment that make measuring and comparing different projects possible.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Project management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">project success</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">success criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">success measure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Production management. Operations management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bouchaib Bahli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">José Rodrigues Farias Filho</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Andre Barcaui</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management</subfield><subfield code="d">Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO), 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2019), 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760628972</subfield><subfield code="x">22378960</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://bjopm.emnuvens.com.br/bjopm/article/view/723</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2237-8960</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
T - Technology |
| author |
Marcela Souto Castro |
| spellingShingle |
Marcela Souto Castro misc TS155-194 misc Project management misc project success misc success criteria misc success measure misc Production management. Operations management A contemporary vision of project success criteria |
| authorStr |
Marcela Souto Castro |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)1760628972 |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
TS155-194 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
22378960 |
| topic_title |
TS155-194 A contemporary vision of project success criteria Project management project success success criteria success measure |
| topic |
misc TS155-194 misc Project management misc project success misc success criteria misc success measure misc Production management. Operations management |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc TS155-194 misc Project management misc project success misc success criteria misc success measure misc Production management. Operations management |
| topic_browse |
misc TS155-194 misc Project management misc project success misc success criteria misc success measure misc Production management. Operations management |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
1760628972 |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)1760628972 |
| title |
A contemporary vision of project success criteria |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ075412241 (DE-599)DOAJ0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 |
| title_full |
A contemporary vision of project success criteria |
| author_sort |
Marcela Souto Castro |
| journal |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management |
| journalStr |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management |
| callnumber-first-code |
T |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2019 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
Marcela Souto Castro Bouchaib Bahli José Rodrigues Farias Filho Andre Barcaui |
| container_volume |
16 |
| class |
TS155-194 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Marcela Souto Castro |
| doi_str_mv |
10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
contemporary vision of project success criteria |
| callnumber |
TS155-194 |
| title_auth |
A contemporary vision of project success criteria |
| abstract |
Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success. Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives of 264 Brazilian project managers and provides a ranking of the most widely used measures in practice in Brazilian organizations. Results: The study analyzes contemporary literature on project success criteria and discusses overlaps and trends. One of the important findings of this research is the identification of mismatches between academic perspectives and those of project managers in regard to project success as well as real success criteria used in organizations. Limitations of the investigation: As the sample covered was comprised exclusively of Brazilian project managers, cross-cultural success criteria research is, therefore, encouraged. Practical implications: The proposed performance criteria can be used in future research and for professional proposes in success criteria assessment. Originality/Value: Given the diversity of success criteria measures, authors can have difficulty in finding the one that better fits their needs; alternatively, they can create their own scale. The reliability of several studies can be questioned due to their subjectivity and, in some cases, weakly defined measures. The present study can therefore provide project professionals with guidelines for success assessment that make measuring and comparing different projects possible. |
| abstractGer |
Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success. Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives of 264 Brazilian project managers and provides a ranking of the most widely used measures in practice in Brazilian organizations. Results: The study analyzes contemporary literature on project success criteria and discusses overlaps and trends. One of the important findings of this research is the identification of mismatches between academic perspectives and those of project managers in regard to project success as well as real success criteria used in organizations. Limitations of the investigation: As the sample covered was comprised exclusively of Brazilian project managers, cross-cultural success criteria research is, therefore, encouraged. Practical implications: The proposed performance criteria can be used in future research and for professional proposes in success criteria assessment. Originality/Value: Given the diversity of success criteria measures, authors can have difficulty in finding the one that better fits their needs; alternatively, they can create their own scale. The reliability of several studies can be questioned due to their subjectivity and, in some cases, weakly defined measures. The present study can therefore provide project professionals with guidelines for success assessment that make measuring and comparing different projects possible. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success. Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives of 264 Brazilian project managers and provides a ranking of the most widely used measures in practice in Brazilian organizations. Results: The study analyzes contemporary literature on project success criteria and discusses overlaps and trends. One of the important findings of this research is the identification of mismatches between academic perspectives and those of project managers in regard to project success as well as real success criteria used in organizations. Limitations of the investigation: As the sample covered was comprised exclusively of Brazilian project managers, cross-cultural success criteria research is, therefore, encouraged. Practical implications: The proposed performance criteria can be used in future research and for professional proposes in success criteria assessment. Originality/Value: Given the diversity of success criteria measures, authors can have difficulty in finding the one that better fits their needs; alternatively, they can create their own scale. The reliability of several studies can be questioned due to their subjectivity and, in some cases, weakly defined measures. The present study can therefore provide project professionals with guidelines for success assessment that make measuring and comparing different projects possible. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_152 GBV_ILN_2009 GBV_ILN_2034 GBV_ILN_2055 GBV_ILN_2108 GBV_ILN_2111 |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
A contemporary vision of project success criteria |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 https://doaj.org/article/0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969 https://bjopm.emnuvens.com.br/bjopm/article/view/723 https://doaj.org/toc/2237-8960 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Bouchaib Bahli José Rodrigues Farias Filho Andre Barcaui |
| author2Str |
Bouchaib Bahli José Rodrigues Farias Filho Andre Barcaui |
| ppnlink |
1760628972 |
| callnumber-subject |
TS - Manufactures |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6 |
| callnumber-a |
TS155-194 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T14:46:02.397Z |
| _version_ |
1803569554938396672 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ075412241</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309133851.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ075412241</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TS155-194</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Marcela Souto Castro</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">A contemporary vision of project success criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goal: The objective of this research is to provide researchers and project management professionals with a contemporary view of the measurement of project success. Design/Methodology/Approach: After a dense literature review, a research-based study analyzes the project success criteria perspectives of 264 Brazilian project managers and provides a ranking of the most widely used measures in practice in Brazilian organizations. Results: The study analyzes contemporary literature on project success criteria and discusses overlaps and trends. One of the important findings of this research is the identification of mismatches between academic perspectives and those of project managers in regard to project success as well as real success criteria used in organizations. Limitations of the investigation: As the sample covered was comprised exclusively of Brazilian project managers, cross-cultural success criteria research is, therefore, encouraged. Practical implications: The proposed performance criteria can be used in future research and for professional proposes in success criteria assessment. Originality/Value: Given the diversity of success criteria measures, authors can have difficulty in finding the one that better fits their needs; alternatively, they can create their own scale. The reliability of several studies can be questioned due to their subjectivity and, in some cases, weakly defined measures. The present study can therefore provide project professionals with guidelines for success assessment that make measuring and comparing different projects possible.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Project management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">project success</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">success criteria</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">success measure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Production management. Operations management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bouchaib Bahli</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">José Rodrigues Farias Filho</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Andre Barcaui</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management</subfield><subfield code="d">Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO), 2019</subfield><subfield code="g">16(2019), 1</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)1760628972</subfield><subfield code="x">22378960</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:16</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2019</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n1.a6</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/0f99623d8fe141d78ac0d53fb1235969</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://bjopm.emnuvens.com.br/bjopm/article/view/723</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2237-8960</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_152</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2034</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2108</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2111</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">16</subfield><subfield code="j">2019</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.3983126 |