Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter
ABSTRACT To study the antimicrobial and uric acid-preserving activity of pine bark tannin on poultry litter composting, antibiotic-free wood chip-based poultry litter was distributed (11 g) to 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes and immediately amended with 1.3 mL0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer (control) o...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
C Arzola-Alavarez [verfasserIn] Y Castillo-Castillo [verfasserIn] RC Anderson [verfasserIn] ME Hume [verfasserIn] O Ruiz-Barrera [verfasserIn] BR Min [verfasserIn] A Arzola-Rubio [verfasserIn] RC Beier [verfasserIn] J Salinas-Chavira [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science - Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, 2004 |
|---|
| Links: |
Link aufrufen |
|---|
| DOI / URN: |
10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ075567725 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ075567725 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230309134619.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228nuuuuuuuuxx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ075567725 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a SF1-1100 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a SF600-1100 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a QL1-991 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a C Arzola-Alavarez |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a ABSTRACT To study the antimicrobial and uric acid-preserving activity of pine bark tannin on poultry litter composting, antibiotic-free wood chip-based poultry litter was distributed (11 g) to 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes and immediately amended with 1.3 mL0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer (control) or with 1.3 mL condensed tannins from pine bark (Pinus palustris; 9 % tannin wt/vol in water). All tubes (n = 3 tubes/treatment) were inoculated with a novobiocin and naladixic acid-resistant Salmo-nella typhimurium (STNN) to achieve 3.0 log10 CFU/g and incubated at 37oC for 3 days to simulate an initial compost period. Wildtype E. coli and the challenge STNN strain as well as concentrations of ammonia, uric acid and urea were measured on days 0 and 3. Pine bark tannin treatment decreased (p<0.01) STNN populations in the litter by 0.6 log units compared to the controls. Wildtype E. coli populations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Ammonia accumulation decreased (p<0.01) 23% in tannin-treated litter compared to the control (2.8 ± 0.1 µmol/g). Conversely, the residual uric acid concentration was 1.6-fold higher (p=0.02) in litter treated with the pine bark tannin than in the control litter. Urea concentrations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Results suggest that pine bark tannin treatment may preserve uric acid and reduce ammonia volatilization in composted litter while aiding Salmonella control. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a poultry litter | |
| 650 | 4 | |a condensed tannins | |
| 650 | 4 | |a uric acid | |
| 650 | 4 | |a bacterial pathogens | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Animal culture | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Veterinary medicine | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Zoology | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Y Castillo-Castillo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a RC Anderson |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a ME Hume |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a O Ruiz-Barrera |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a BR Min |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a A Arzola-Rubio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a RC Beier |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a J Salinas-Chavira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science |d Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, 2004 |w (DE-627)38748017X |w (DE-600)2145587-9 |x 18069061 |7 nnns |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000100305&lng=en&tlng=en |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1516-635X |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1806-9061 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| author_variant |
c a a caa y c c ycc r a ra m h mh o r b orb b m bm a a r aar r b rb j s c jsc |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:18069061:uuuuuuuu::nlecopnbrtniobceilahgngotadirgnopudocag |
| callnumber-subject-code |
SF |
| allfields |
10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 doi (DE-627)DOAJ075567725 (DE-599)DOAJ4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF1-1100 SF600-1100 QL1-991 C Arzola-Alavarez verfasserin aut Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ABSTRACT To study the antimicrobial and uric acid-preserving activity of pine bark tannin on poultry litter composting, antibiotic-free wood chip-based poultry litter was distributed (11 g) to 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes and immediately amended with 1.3 mL0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer (control) or with 1.3 mL condensed tannins from pine bark (Pinus palustris; 9 % tannin wt/vol in water). All tubes (n = 3 tubes/treatment) were inoculated with a novobiocin and naladixic acid-resistant Salmo-nella typhimurium (STNN) to achieve 3.0 log10 CFU/g and incubated at 37oC for 3 days to simulate an initial compost period. Wildtype E. coli and the challenge STNN strain as well as concentrations of ammonia, uric acid and urea were measured on days 0 and 3. Pine bark tannin treatment decreased (p<0.01) STNN populations in the litter by 0.6 log units compared to the controls. Wildtype E. coli populations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Ammonia accumulation decreased (p<0.01) 23% in tannin-treated litter compared to the control (2.8 ± 0.1 µmol/g). Conversely, the residual uric acid concentration was 1.6-fold higher (p=0.02) in litter treated with the pine bark tannin than in the control litter. Urea concentrations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Results suggest that pine bark tannin treatment may preserve uric acid and reduce ammonia volatilization in composted litter while aiding Salmonella control. poultry litter condensed tannins uric acid bacterial pathogens Animal culture Veterinary medicine Zoology Y Castillo-Castillo verfasserin aut RC Anderson verfasserin aut ME Hume verfasserin aut O Ruiz-Barrera verfasserin aut BR Min verfasserin aut A Arzola-Rubio verfasserin aut RC Beier verfasserin aut J Salinas-Chavira verfasserin aut In Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, 2004 (DE-627)38748017X (DE-600)2145587-9 18069061 nnns https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000100305&lng=en&tlng=en kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1516-635X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1806-9061 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR |
| spelling |
10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 doi (DE-627)DOAJ075567725 (DE-599)DOAJ4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF1-1100 SF600-1100 QL1-991 C Arzola-Alavarez verfasserin aut Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ABSTRACT To study the antimicrobial and uric acid-preserving activity of pine bark tannin on poultry litter composting, antibiotic-free wood chip-based poultry litter was distributed (11 g) to 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes and immediately amended with 1.3 mL0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer (control) or with 1.3 mL condensed tannins from pine bark (Pinus palustris; 9 % tannin wt/vol in water). All tubes (n = 3 tubes/treatment) were inoculated with a novobiocin and naladixic acid-resistant Salmo-nella typhimurium (STNN) to achieve 3.0 log10 CFU/g and incubated at 37oC for 3 days to simulate an initial compost period. Wildtype E. coli and the challenge STNN strain as well as concentrations of ammonia, uric acid and urea were measured on days 0 and 3. Pine bark tannin treatment decreased (p<0.01) STNN populations in the litter by 0.6 log units compared to the controls. Wildtype E. coli populations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Ammonia accumulation decreased (p<0.01) 23% in tannin-treated litter compared to the control (2.8 ± 0.1 µmol/g). Conversely, the residual uric acid concentration was 1.6-fold higher (p=0.02) in litter treated with the pine bark tannin than in the control litter. Urea concentrations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Results suggest that pine bark tannin treatment may preserve uric acid and reduce ammonia volatilization in composted litter while aiding Salmonella control. poultry litter condensed tannins uric acid bacterial pathogens Animal culture Veterinary medicine Zoology Y Castillo-Castillo verfasserin aut RC Anderson verfasserin aut ME Hume verfasserin aut O Ruiz-Barrera verfasserin aut BR Min verfasserin aut A Arzola-Rubio verfasserin aut RC Beier verfasserin aut J Salinas-Chavira verfasserin aut In Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, 2004 (DE-627)38748017X (DE-600)2145587-9 18069061 nnns https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000100305&lng=en&tlng=en kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1516-635X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1806-9061 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR |
| allfields_unstemmed |
10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 doi (DE-627)DOAJ075567725 (DE-599)DOAJ4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF1-1100 SF600-1100 QL1-991 C Arzola-Alavarez verfasserin aut Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ABSTRACT To study the antimicrobial and uric acid-preserving activity of pine bark tannin on poultry litter composting, antibiotic-free wood chip-based poultry litter was distributed (11 g) to 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes and immediately amended with 1.3 mL0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer (control) or with 1.3 mL condensed tannins from pine bark (Pinus palustris; 9 % tannin wt/vol in water). All tubes (n = 3 tubes/treatment) were inoculated with a novobiocin and naladixic acid-resistant Salmo-nella typhimurium (STNN) to achieve 3.0 log10 CFU/g and incubated at 37oC for 3 days to simulate an initial compost period. Wildtype E. coli and the challenge STNN strain as well as concentrations of ammonia, uric acid and urea were measured on days 0 and 3. Pine bark tannin treatment decreased (p<0.01) STNN populations in the litter by 0.6 log units compared to the controls. Wildtype E. coli populations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Ammonia accumulation decreased (p<0.01) 23% in tannin-treated litter compared to the control (2.8 ± 0.1 µmol/g). Conversely, the residual uric acid concentration was 1.6-fold higher (p=0.02) in litter treated with the pine bark tannin than in the control litter. Urea concentrations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Results suggest that pine bark tannin treatment may preserve uric acid and reduce ammonia volatilization in composted litter while aiding Salmonella control. poultry litter condensed tannins uric acid bacterial pathogens Animal culture Veterinary medicine Zoology Y Castillo-Castillo verfasserin aut RC Anderson verfasserin aut ME Hume verfasserin aut O Ruiz-Barrera verfasserin aut BR Min verfasserin aut A Arzola-Rubio verfasserin aut RC Beier verfasserin aut J Salinas-Chavira verfasserin aut In Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, 2004 (DE-627)38748017X (DE-600)2145587-9 18069061 nnns https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000100305&lng=en&tlng=en kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1516-635X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1806-9061 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR |
| allfieldsGer |
10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 doi (DE-627)DOAJ075567725 (DE-599)DOAJ4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF1-1100 SF600-1100 QL1-991 C Arzola-Alavarez verfasserin aut Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ABSTRACT To study the antimicrobial and uric acid-preserving activity of pine bark tannin on poultry litter composting, antibiotic-free wood chip-based poultry litter was distributed (11 g) to 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes and immediately amended with 1.3 mL0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer (control) or with 1.3 mL condensed tannins from pine bark (Pinus palustris; 9 % tannin wt/vol in water). All tubes (n = 3 tubes/treatment) were inoculated with a novobiocin and naladixic acid-resistant Salmo-nella typhimurium (STNN) to achieve 3.0 log10 CFU/g and incubated at 37oC for 3 days to simulate an initial compost period. Wildtype E. coli and the challenge STNN strain as well as concentrations of ammonia, uric acid and urea were measured on days 0 and 3. Pine bark tannin treatment decreased (p<0.01) STNN populations in the litter by 0.6 log units compared to the controls. Wildtype E. coli populations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Ammonia accumulation decreased (p<0.01) 23% in tannin-treated litter compared to the control (2.8 ± 0.1 µmol/g). Conversely, the residual uric acid concentration was 1.6-fold higher (p=0.02) in litter treated with the pine bark tannin than in the control litter. Urea concentrations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Results suggest that pine bark tannin treatment may preserve uric acid and reduce ammonia volatilization in composted litter while aiding Salmonella control. poultry litter condensed tannins uric acid bacterial pathogens Animal culture Veterinary medicine Zoology Y Castillo-Castillo verfasserin aut RC Anderson verfasserin aut ME Hume verfasserin aut O Ruiz-Barrera verfasserin aut BR Min verfasserin aut A Arzola-Rubio verfasserin aut RC Beier verfasserin aut J Salinas-Chavira verfasserin aut In Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, 2004 (DE-627)38748017X (DE-600)2145587-9 18069061 nnns https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000100305&lng=en&tlng=en kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1516-635X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1806-9061 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR |
| allfieldsSound |
10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 doi (DE-627)DOAJ075567725 (DE-599)DOAJ4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng SF1-1100 SF600-1100 QL1-991 C Arzola-Alavarez verfasserin aut Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier ABSTRACT To study the antimicrobial and uric acid-preserving activity of pine bark tannin on poultry litter composting, antibiotic-free wood chip-based poultry litter was distributed (11 g) to 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes and immediately amended with 1.3 mL0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer (control) or with 1.3 mL condensed tannins from pine bark (Pinus palustris; 9 % tannin wt/vol in water). All tubes (n = 3 tubes/treatment) were inoculated with a novobiocin and naladixic acid-resistant Salmo-nella typhimurium (STNN) to achieve 3.0 log10 CFU/g and incubated at 37oC for 3 days to simulate an initial compost period. Wildtype E. coli and the challenge STNN strain as well as concentrations of ammonia, uric acid and urea were measured on days 0 and 3. Pine bark tannin treatment decreased (p<0.01) STNN populations in the litter by 0.6 log units compared to the controls. Wildtype E. coli populations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Ammonia accumulation decreased (p<0.01) 23% in tannin-treated litter compared to the control (2.8 ± 0.1 µmol/g). Conversely, the residual uric acid concentration was 1.6-fold higher (p=0.02) in litter treated with the pine bark tannin than in the control litter. Urea concentrations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Results suggest that pine bark tannin treatment may preserve uric acid and reduce ammonia volatilization in composted litter while aiding Salmonella control. poultry litter condensed tannins uric acid bacterial pathogens Animal culture Veterinary medicine Zoology Y Castillo-Castillo verfasserin aut RC Anderson verfasserin aut ME Hume verfasserin aut O Ruiz-Barrera verfasserin aut BR Min verfasserin aut A Arzola-Rubio verfasserin aut RC Beier verfasserin aut J Salinas-Chavira verfasserin aut In Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, 2004 (DE-627)38748017X (DE-600)2145587-9 18069061 nnns https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 kostenfrei http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000100305&lng=en&tlng=en kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1516-635X Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1806-9061 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR |
| language |
English |
| source |
In Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science |
| sourceStr |
In Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
poultry litter condensed tannins uric acid bacterial pathogens Animal culture Veterinary medicine Zoology |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
C Arzola-Alavarez @@aut@@ Y Castillo-Castillo @@aut@@ RC Anderson @@aut@@ ME Hume @@aut@@ O Ruiz-Barrera @@aut@@ BR Min @@aut@@ A Arzola-Rubio @@aut@@ RC Beier @@aut@@ J Salinas-Chavira @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2024-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
38748017X |
| id |
DOAJ075567725 |
| language_de |
englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ075567725</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309134619.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228nuuuuuuuuxx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ075567725</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SF1-1100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SF600-1100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QL1-991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">C Arzola-Alavarez</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ABSTRACT To study the antimicrobial and uric acid-preserving activity of pine bark tannin on poultry litter composting, antibiotic-free wood chip-based poultry litter was distributed (11 g) to 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes and immediately amended with 1.3 mL0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer (control) or with 1.3 mL condensed tannins from pine bark (Pinus palustris; 9 % tannin wt/vol in water). All tubes (n = 3 tubes/treatment) were inoculated with a novobiocin and naladixic acid-resistant Salmo-nella typhimurium (STNN) to achieve 3.0 log10 CFU/g and incubated at 37oC for 3 days to simulate an initial compost period. Wildtype E. coli and the challenge STNN strain as well as concentrations of ammonia, uric acid and urea were measured on days 0 and 3. Pine bark tannin treatment decreased (p<0.01) STNN populations in the litter by 0.6 log units compared to the controls. Wildtype E. coli populations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Ammonia accumulation decreased (p<0.01) 23% in tannin-treated litter compared to the control (2.8 ± 0.1 µmol/g). Conversely, the residual uric acid concentration was 1.6-fold higher (p=0.02) in litter treated with the pine bark tannin than in the control litter. Urea concentrations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Results suggest that pine bark tannin treatment may preserve uric acid and reduce ammonia volatilization in composted litter while aiding Salmonella control.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">poultry litter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">condensed tannins</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">uric acid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bacterial pathogens</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Animal culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Veterinary medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Zoology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Y Castillo-Castillo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RC Anderson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ME Hume</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O Ruiz-Barrera</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BR Min</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A Arzola-Rubio</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RC Beier</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">J Salinas-Chavira</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</subfield><subfield code="d">Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, 2004</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)38748017X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2145587-9</subfield><subfield code="x">18069061</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000100305&lng=en&tlng=en</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1516-635X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1806-9061</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| callnumber-first |
S - Agriculture |
| author |
C Arzola-Alavarez |
| spellingShingle |
C Arzola-Alavarez misc SF1-1100 misc SF600-1100 misc QL1-991 misc poultry litter misc condensed tannins misc uric acid misc bacterial pathogens misc Animal culture misc Veterinary medicine misc Zoology Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter |
| authorStr |
C Arzola-Alavarez |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)38748017X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| callnumber-label |
SF1-1100 |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
18069061 |
| topic_title |
SF1-1100 SF600-1100 QL1-991 Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter poultry litter condensed tannins uric acid bacterial pathogens |
| topic |
misc SF1-1100 misc SF600-1100 misc QL1-991 misc poultry litter misc condensed tannins misc uric acid misc bacterial pathogens misc Animal culture misc Veterinary medicine misc Zoology |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc SF1-1100 misc SF600-1100 misc QL1-991 misc poultry litter misc condensed tannins misc uric acid misc bacterial pathogens misc Animal culture misc Veterinary medicine misc Zoology |
| topic_browse |
misc SF1-1100 misc SF600-1100 misc QL1-991 misc poultry litter misc condensed tannins misc uric acid misc bacterial pathogens misc Animal culture misc Veterinary medicine misc Zoology |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
38748017X |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)38748017X (DE-600)2145587-9 |
| title |
Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ075567725 (DE-599)DOAJ4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 |
| title_full |
Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter |
| author_sort |
C Arzola-Alavarez |
| journal |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science |
| journalStr |
Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science |
| callnumber-first-code |
S |
| lang_code |
eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| author_browse |
C Arzola-Alavarez Y Castillo-Castillo RC Anderson ME Hume O Ruiz-Barrera BR Min A Arzola-Rubio RC Beier J Salinas-Chavira |
| class |
SF1-1100 SF600-1100 QL1-991 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
C Arzola-Alavarez |
| doi_str_mv |
10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 |
| author2-role |
verfasserin |
| title_sort |
influence of pine bark tannin on bacterial pathogens growth and nitrogen compounds on changes in composted poultry litter |
| callnumber |
SF1-1100 |
| title_auth |
Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter |
| abstract |
ABSTRACT To study the antimicrobial and uric acid-preserving activity of pine bark tannin on poultry litter composting, antibiotic-free wood chip-based poultry litter was distributed (11 g) to 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes and immediately amended with 1.3 mL0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer (control) or with 1.3 mL condensed tannins from pine bark (Pinus palustris; 9 % tannin wt/vol in water). All tubes (n = 3 tubes/treatment) were inoculated with a novobiocin and naladixic acid-resistant Salmo-nella typhimurium (STNN) to achieve 3.0 log10 CFU/g and incubated at 37oC for 3 days to simulate an initial compost period. Wildtype E. coli and the challenge STNN strain as well as concentrations of ammonia, uric acid and urea were measured on days 0 and 3. Pine bark tannin treatment decreased (p<0.01) STNN populations in the litter by 0.6 log units compared to the controls. Wildtype E. coli populations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Ammonia accumulation decreased (p<0.01) 23% in tannin-treated litter compared to the control (2.8 ± 0.1 µmol/g). Conversely, the residual uric acid concentration was 1.6-fold higher (p=0.02) in litter treated with the pine bark tannin than in the control litter. Urea concentrations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Results suggest that pine bark tannin treatment may preserve uric acid and reduce ammonia volatilization in composted litter while aiding Salmonella control. |
| abstractGer |
ABSTRACT To study the antimicrobial and uric acid-preserving activity of pine bark tannin on poultry litter composting, antibiotic-free wood chip-based poultry litter was distributed (11 g) to 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes and immediately amended with 1.3 mL0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer (control) or with 1.3 mL condensed tannins from pine bark (Pinus palustris; 9 % tannin wt/vol in water). All tubes (n = 3 tubes/treatment) were inoculated with a novobiocin and naladixic acid-resistant Salmo-nella typhimurium (STNN) to achieve 3.0 log10 CFU/g and incubated at 37oC for 3 days to simulate an initial compost period. Wildtype E. coli and the challenge STNN strain as well as concentrations of ammonia, uric acid and urea were measured on days 0 and 3. Pine bark tannin treatment decreased (p<0.01) STNN populations in the litter by 0.6 log units compared to the controls. Wildtype E. coli populations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Ammonia accumulation decreased (p<0.01) 23% in tannin-treated litter compared to the control (2.8 ± 0.1 µmol/g). Conversely, the residual uric acid concentration was 1.6-fold higher (p=0.02) in litter treated with the pine bark tannin than in the control litter. Urea concentrations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Results suggest that pine bark tannin treatment may preserve uric acid and reduce ammonia volatilization in composted litter while aiding Salmonella control. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
ABSTRACT To study the antimicrobial and uric acid-preserving activity of pine bark tannin on poultry litter composting, antibiotic-free wood chip-based poultry litter was distributed (11 g) to 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes and immediately amended with 1.3 mL0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer (control) or with 1.3 mL condensed tannins from pine bark (Pinus palustris; 9 % tannin wt/vol in water). All tubes (n = 3 tubes/treatment) were inoculated with a novobiocin and naladixic acid-resistant Salmo-nella typhimurium (STNN) to achieve 3.0 log10 CFU/g and incubated at 37oC for 3 days to simulate an initial compost period. Wildtype E. coli and the challenge STNN strain as well as concentrations of ammonia, uric acid and urea were measured on days 0 and 3. Pine bark tannin treatment decreased (p<0.01) STNN populations in the litter by 0.6 log units compared to the controls. Wildtype E. coli populations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Ammonia accumulation decreased (p<0.01) 23% in tannin-treated litter compared to the control (2.8 ± 0.1 µmol/g). Conversely, the residual uric acid concentration was 1.6-fold higher (p=0.02) in litter treated with the pine bark tannin than in the control litter. Urea concentrations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Results suggest that pine bark tannin treatment may preserve uric acid and reduce ammonia volatilization in composted litter while aiding Salmonella control. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| title_short |
Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 https://doaj.org/article/4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3 http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000100305&lng=en&tlng=en https://doaj.org/toc/1516-635X https://doaj.org/toc/1806-9061 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| author2 |
Y Castillo-Castillo RC Anderson ME Hume O Ruiz-Barrera BR Min A Arzola-Rubio RC Beier J Salinas-Chavira |
| author2Str |
Y Castillo-Castillo RC Anderson ME Hume O Ruiz-Barrera BR Min A Arzola-Rubio RC Beier J Salinas-Chavira |
| ppnlink |
38748017X |
| callnumber-subject |
SF - Animal Culture |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| doi_str |
10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911 |
| callnumber-a |
SF1-1100 |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T15:38:34.101Z |
| _version_ |
1803572859741667328 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ075567725</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309134619.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228nuuuuuuuuxx |||||o 00| ||eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ075567725</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SF1-1100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">SF600-1100</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">QL1-991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">C Arzola-Alavarez</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Influence of Pine Bark Tannin on Bacterial Pathogens Growth and Nitrogen Compounds on Changes in Composted Poultry Litter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ABSTRACT To study the antimicrobial and uric acid-preserving activity of pine bark tannin on poultry litter composting, antibiotic-free wood chip-based poultry litter was distributed (11 g) to 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes and immediately amended with 1.3 mL0.4 M sodium phosphate buffer (control) or with 1.3 mL condensed tannins from pine bark (Pinus palustris; 9 % tannin wt/vol in water). All tubes (n = 3 tubes/treatment) were inoculated with a novobiocin and naladixic acid-resistant Salmo-nella typhimurium (STNN) to achieve 3.0 log10 CFU/g and incubated at 37oC for 3 days to simulate an initial compost period. Wildtype E. coli and the challenge STNN strain as well as concentrations of ammonia, uric acid and urea were measured on days 0 and 3. Pine bark tannin treatment decreased (p<0.01) STNN populations in the litter by 0.6 log units compared to the controls. Wildtype E. coli populations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Ammonia accumulation decreased (p<0.01) 23% in tannin-treated litter compared to the control (2.8 ± 0.1 µmol/g). Conversely, the residual uric acid concentration was 1.6-fold higher (p=0.02) in litter treated with the pine bark tannin than in the control litter. Urea concentrations were unaffected by tannin treatment (p<0.05). Results suggest that pine bark tannin treatment may preserve uric acid and reduce ammonia volatilization in composted litter while aiding Salmonella control.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">poultry litter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">condensed tannins</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">uric acid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">bacterial pathogens</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Animal culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Veterinary medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Zoology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Y Castillo-Castillo</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RC Anderson</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ME Hume</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">O Ruiz-Barrera</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">BR Min</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A Arzola-Rubio</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RC Beier</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">J Salinas-Chavira</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</subfield><subfield code="d">Fundação APINCO de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícolas, 2004</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)38748017X</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2145587-9</subfield><subfield code="x">18069061</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0911</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/4e5caedf997b4eeca6d113c1d611edc3</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-635X2020000100305&lng=en&tlng=en</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1516-635X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1806-9061</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4004774 |