Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital

Introduction: Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed in obstetrics. It has evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mothers and foetus during a difficult delivery. There has been a steady increase in the rate of the caesarean section this study was done to analyze the rate and...
Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Autor*in:	Geethashree H C [verfasserIn] Venkata Sushma B [verfasserIn] Pradeep S. [verfasserIn]

Format:	E-Artikel
Sprache:	Englisch

Erschienen:	2021

Schlagwörter:	cesarean section indications elective emergency

Übergeordnetes Werk:	In: International Journal of Surgery and Medicine - Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons, 2015, 7(2021), 4, Seite 19-24
Übergeordnetes Werk:	volume:7 ; year:2021 ; number:4 ; pages:19-24

Links:	Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Link aufrufen Journal toc Journal toc

Katalog-ID:	DOAJ075753391

Internformat


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	DOAJ075753391
003	DE-627
005	20230503055437.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)DOAJ075753391
035			\|a (DE-599)DOAJ05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	0		\|a Geethashree H C \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital
264		1	\|c 2021
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a Introduction: Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed in obstetrics. It has evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mothers and foetus during a difficult delivery. There has been a steady increase in the rate of the caesarean section this study was done to analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of the present study. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted for a period of 1year from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PES institute of medical sciences and research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the study period were recorded and statistical analysis of various parameters such as caesarean section rates, type, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done. Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 3218, out of which C-Sections were 1422. The overall CS rate was 44.18%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (42.61%) followed by CPD (24.82%), NRFS (7.31%), Maternal demand (5.13%), breech presentation (4.43%), oligohydramnios (3.72%) and failed induction of labour (4.21%). 12.26% of patients had various complications mainly infection (5.76%) and haemorrhage (4.31%). There was no mortality during this period. Conclusions: A high priority should be given to a healthy baby and the mother rather than striving to achieve a specific rate. Institutional protocols for conditions like fetal distress, non-progress of labour and failed induction should be doctored. Inductions should be done only when necessary. A regular audit should be done to rationalize the C- Section rates.
650		4	\|a cesarean section
650		4	\|a indications
650		4	\|a elective
650		4	\|a emergency
653		0	\|a Medicine
653		0	\|a R
700	0		\|a Venkata Sushma B \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
700	0		\|a Pradeep S. \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
773	0	8	\|i In \|t International Journal of Surgery and Medicine \|d Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons, 2015 \|g 7(2021), 4, Seite 19-24 \|w (DE-627)828163707 \|w (DE-600)2825196-9 \|x 2367699X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:7 \|g year:2021 \|g number:4 \|g pages:19-24
856	4	0	\|u http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijsm.CAESAREAN-SECTION-INDICATION \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u https://doaj.org/article/05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471 \|z kostenfrei
856	4	0	\|u http://www.ejos.org/index.php?fulltxt=63115&fulltxtj=136&fulltxtp=136-1615466972.pdf \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2367-7414 \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
856	4	2	\|u https://doaj.org/toc/2367-699X \|y Journal toc \|z kostenfrei
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_DOAJ
912			\|a SSG-OLC-PHA
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_74
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 7 \|j 2021 \|e 4 \|h 19-24

Indexfelder

author_variant	g h c ghc v s b vsb p s ps
matchkey_str	article:2367699X:2021----::niainoceaenetoiaetaya
hierarchy_sort_str	2021
publishDate	2021
allfields	(DE-627)DOAJ075753391 (DE-599)DOAJ05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Geethashree H C verfasserin aut Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed in obstetrics. It has evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mothers and foetus during a difficult delivery. There has been a steady increase in the rate of the caesarean section this study was done to analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of the present study. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted for a period of 1year from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PES institute of medical sciences and research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the study period were recorded and statistical analysis of various parameters such as caesarean section rates, type, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done. Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 3218, out of which C-Sections were 1422. The overall CS rate was 44.18%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (42.61%) followed by CPD (24.82%), NRFS (7.31%), Maternal demand (5.13%), breech presentation (4.43%), oligohydramnios (3.72%) and failed induction of labour (4.21%). 12.26% of patients had various complications mainly infection (5.76%) and haemorrhage (4.31%). There was no mortality during this period. Conclusions: A high priority should be given to a healthy baby and the mother rather than striving to achieve a specific rate. Institutional protocols for conditions like fetal distress, non-progress of labour and failed induction should be doctored. Inductions should be done only when necessary. A regular audit should be done to rationalize the C- Section rates. cesarean section indications elective emergency Medicine R Venkata Sushma B verfasserin aut Pradeep S. verfasserin aut In International Journal of Surgery and Medicine Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons, 2015 7(2021), 4, Seite 19-24 (DE-627)828163707 (DE-600)2825196-9 2367699X nnns volume:7 year:2021 number:4 pages:19-24 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijsm.CAESAREAN-SECTION-INDICATION kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471 kostenfrei http://www.ejos.org/index.php?fulltxt=63115&fulltxtj=136&fulltxtp=136-1615466972.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2367-7414 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2367-699X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2021 4 19-24
spelling	(DE-627)DOAJ075753391 (DE-599)DOAJ05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Geethashree H C verfasserin aut Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed in obstetrics. It has evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mothers and foetus during a difficult delivery. There has been a steady increase in the rate of the caesarean section this study was done to analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of the present study. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted for a period of 1year from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PES institute of medical sciences and research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the study period were recorded and statistical analysis of various parameters such as caesarean section rates, type, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done. Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 3218, out of which C-Sections were 1422. The overall CS rate was 44.18%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (42.61%) followed by CPD (24.82%), NRFS (7.31%), Maternal demand (5.13%), breech presentation (4.43%), oligohydramnios (3.72%) and failed induction of labour (4.21%). 12.26% of patients had various complications mainly infection (5.76%) and haemorrhage (4.31%). There was no mortality during this period. Conclusions: A high priority should be given to a healthy baby and the mother rather than striving to achieve a specific rate. Institutional protocols for conditions like fetal distress, non-progress of labour and failed induction should be doctored. Inductions should be done only when necessary. A regular audit should be done to rationalize the C- Section rates. cesarean section indications elective emergency Medicine R Venkata Sushma B verfasserin aut Pradeep S. verfasserin aut In International Journal of Surgery and Medicine Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons, 2015 7(2021), 4, Seite 19-24 (DE-627)828163707 (DE-600)2825196-9 2367699X nnns volume:7 year:2021 number:4 pages:19-24 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijsm.CAESAREAN-SECTION-INDICATION kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471 kostenfrei http://www.ejos.org/index.php?fulltxt=63115&fulltxtj=136&fulltxtp=136-1615466972.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2367-7414 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2367-699X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2021 4 19-24
allfields_unstemmed	(DE-627)DOAJ075753391 (DE-599)DOAJ05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Geethashree H C verfasserin aut Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed in obstetrics. It has evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mothers and foetus during a difficult delivery. There has been a steady increase in the rate of the caesarean section this study was done to analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of the present study. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted for a period of 1year from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PES institute of medical sciences and research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the study period were recorded and statistical analysis of various parameters such as caesarean section rates, type, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done. Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 3218, out of which C-Sections were 1422. The overall CS rate was 44.18%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (42.61%) followed by CPD (24.82%), NRFS (7.31%), Maternal demand (5.13%), breech presentation (4.43%), oligohydramnios (3.72%) and failed induction of labour (4.21%). 12.26% of patients had various complications mainly infection (5.76%) and haemorrhage (4.31%). There was no mortality during this period. Conclusions: A high priority should be given to a healthy baby and the mother rather than striving to achieve a specific rate. Institutional protocols for conditions like fetal distress, non-progress of labour and failed induction should be doctored. Inductions should be done only when necessary. A regular audit should be done to rationalize the C- Section rates. cesarean section indications elective emergency Medicine R Venkata Sushma B verfasserin aut Pradeep S. verfasserin aut In International Journal of Surgery and Medicine Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons, 2015 7(2021), 4, Seite 19-24 (DE-627)828163707 (DE-600)2825196-9 2367699X nnns volume:7 year:2021 number:4 pages:19-24 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijsm.CAESAREAN-SECTION-INDICATION kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471 kostenfrei http://www.ejos.org/index.php?fulltxt=63115&fulltxtj=136&fulltxtp=136-1615466972.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2367-7414 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2367-699X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2021 4 19-24
allfieldsGer	(DE-627)DOAJ075753391 (DE-599)DOAJ05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Geethashree H C verfasserin aut Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed in obstetrics. It has evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mothers and foetus during a difficult delivery. There has been a steady increase in the rate of the caesarean section this study was done to analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of the present study. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted for a period of 1year from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PES institute of medical sciences and research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the study period were recorded and statistical analysis of various parameters such as caesarean section rates, type, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done. Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 3218, out of which C-Sections were 1422. The overall CS rate was 44.18%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (42.61%) followed by CPD (24.82%), NRFS (7.31%), Maternal demand (5.13%), breech presentation (4.43%), oligohydramnios (3.72%) and failed induction of labour (4.21%). 12.26% of patients had various complications mainly infection (5.76%) and haemorrhage (4.31%). There was no mortality during this period. Conclusions: A high priority should be given to a healthy baby and the mother rather than striving to achieve a specific rate. Institutional protocols for conditions like fetal distress, non-progress of labour and failed induction should be doctored. Inductions should be done only when necessary. A regular audit should be done to rationalize the C- Section rates. cesarean section indications elective emergency Medicine R Venkata Sushma B verfasserin aut Pradeep S. verfasserin aut In International Journal of Surgery and Medicine Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons, 2015 7(2021), 4, Seite 19-24 (DE-627)828163707 (DE-600)2825196-9 2367699X nnns volume:7 year:2021 number:4 pages:19-24 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijsm.CAESAREAN-SECTION-INDICATION kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471 kostenfrei http://www.ejos.org/index.php?fulltxt=63115&fulltxtj=136&fulltxtp=136-1615466972.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2367-7414 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2367-699X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2021 4 19-24
allfieldsSound	(DE-627)DOAJ075753391 (DE-599)DOAJ05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb eng Geethashree H C verfasserin aut Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital 2021 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier Introduction: Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed in obstetrics. It has evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mothers and foetus during a difficult delivery. There has been a steady increase in the rate of the caesarean section this study was done to analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of the present study. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted for a period of 1year from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PES institute of medical sciences and research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the study period were recorded and statistical analysis of various parameters such as caesarean section rates, type, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done. Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 3218, out of which C-Sections were 1422. The overall CS rate was 44.18%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (42.61%) followed by CPD (24.82%), NRFS (7.31%), Maternal demand (5.13%), breech presentation (4.43%), oligohydramnios (3.72%) and failed induction of labour (4.21%). 12.26% of patients had various complications mainly infection (5.76%) and haemorrhage (4.31%). There was no mortality during this period. Conclusions: A high priority should be given to a healthy baby and the mother rather than striving to achieve a specific rate. Institutional protocols for conditions like fetal distress, non-progress of labour and failed induction should be doctored. Inductions should be done only when necessary. A regular audit should be done to rationalize the C- Section rates. cesarean section indications elective emergency Medicine R Venkata Sushma B verfasserin aut Pradeep S. verfasserin aut In International Journal of Surgery and Medicine Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons, 2015 7(2021), 4, Seite 19-24 (DE-627)828163707 (DE-600)2825196-9 2367699X nnns volume:7 year:2021 number:4 pages:19-24 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijsm.CAESAREAN-SECTION-INDICATION kostenfrei https://doaj.org/article/05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471 kostenfrei http://www.ejos.org/index.php?fulltxt=63115&fulltxtj=136&fulltxtp=136-1615466972.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2367-7414 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/2367-699X Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700 AR 7 2021 4 19-24
language	English
source	In International Journal of Surgery and Medicine 7(2021), 4, Seite 19-24 volume:7 year:2021 number:4 pages:19-24
sourceStr	In International Journal of Surgery and Medicine 7(2021), 4, Seite 19-24 volume:7 year:2021 number:4 pages:19-24
format_phy_str_mv	Article
institution	findex.gbv.de
topic_facet	cesarean section indications elective emergency Medicine R
isfreeaccess_bool	true
container_title	International Journal of Surgery and Medicine
authorswithroles_txt_mv	Geethashree H C @@aut@@ Venkata Sushma B @@aut@@ Pradeep S. @@aut@@
publishDateDaySort_date	2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
hierarchy_top_id	828163707
id	DOAJ075753391
language_de	englisch
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ075753391</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503055437.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ075753391</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Geethashree H C</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed in obstetrics. It has evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mothers and foetus during a difficult delivery. There has been a steady increase in the rate of the caesarean section this study was done to analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of the present study. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted for a period of 1year from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PES institute of medical sciences and research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the study period were recorded and statistical analysis of various parameters such as caesarean section rates, type, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done. Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 3218, out of which C-Sections were 1422. The overall CS rate was 44.18%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (42.61%) followed by CPD (24.82%), NRFS (7.31%), Maternal demand (5.13%), breech presentation (4.43%), oligohydramnios (3.72%) and failed induction of labour (4.21%). 12.26% of patients had various complications mainly infection (5.76%) and haemorrhage (4.31%). There was no mortality during this period. Conclusions: A high priority should be given to a healthy baby and the mother rather than striving to achieve a specific rate. Institutional protocols for conditions like fetal distress, non-progress of labour and failed induction should be doctored. Inductions should be done only when necessary. A regular audit should be done to rationalize the C- Section rates.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cesarean section</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">indications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">elective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">emergency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Venkata Sushma B</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pradeep S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of Surgery and Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2021), 4, Seite 19-24</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)828163707</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2825196-9</subfield><subfield code="x">2367699X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:19-24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijsm.CAESAREAN-SECTION-INDICATION</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.ejos.org/index.php?fulltxt=63115&fulltxtj=136&fulltxtp=136-1615466972.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2367-7414</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2367-699X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">19-24</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
author	Geethashree H C
spellingShingle	Geethashree H C misc cesarean section misc indications misc elective misc emergency misc Medicine misc R Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital
authorStr	Geethashree H C
ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv	@@773@@(DE-627)828163707
format	electronic Article
delete_txt_mv	keep
author_role	aut aut aut
collection	DOAJ
remote_str	true
illustrated	Not Illustrated
issn	2367699X
topic_title	Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital cesarean section indications elective emergency
topic	misc cesarean section misc indications misc elective misc emergency misc Medicine misc R
topic_unstemmed	misc cesarean section misc indications misc elective misc emergency misc Medicine misc R
topic_browse	misc cesarean section misc indications misc elective misc emergency misc Medicine misc R
format_facet	Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource
format_main_str_mv	Text Zeitschrift/Artikel
carriertype_str_mv	cr
hierarchy_parent_title	International Journal of Surgery and Medicine
hierarchy_parent_id	828163707
hierarchy_top_title	International Journal of Surgery and Medicine
isfreeaccess_txt	true
familylinks_str_mv	(DE-627)828163707 (DE-600)2825196-9
title	Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital
ctrlnum	(DE-627)DOAJ075753391 (DE-599)DOAJ05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471
title_full	Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital
author_sort	Geethashree H C
journal	International Journal of Surgery and Medicine
journalStr	International Journal of Surgery and Medicine
lang_code	eng
isOA_bool	true
recordtype	marc
publishDateSort	2021
contenttype_str_mv	txt
container_start_page	19
author_browse	Geethashree H C Venkata Sushma B Pradeep S.
container_volume	7
format_se	Elektronische Aufsätze
author-letter	Geethashree H C
author2-role	verfasserin
title_sort	indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital
title_auth	Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital
abstract	Introduction: Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed in obstetrics. It has evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mothers and foetus during a difficult delivery. There has been a steady increase in the rate of the caesarean section this study was done to analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of the present study. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted for a period of 1year from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PES institute of medical sciences and research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the study period were recorded and statistical analysis of various parameters such as caesarean section rates, type, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done. Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 3218, out of which C-Sections were 1422. The overall CS rate was 44.18%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (42.61%) followed by CPD (24.82%), NRFS (7.31%), Maternal demand (5.13%), breech presentation (4.43%), oligohydramnios (3.72%) and failed induction of labour (4.21%). 12.26% of patients had various complications mainly infection (5.76%) and haemorrhage (4.31%). There was no mortality during this period. Conclusions: A high priority should be given to a healthy baby and the mother rather than striving to achieve a specific rate. Institutional protocols for conditions like fetal distress, non-progress of labour and failed induction should be doctored. Inductions should be done only when necessary. A regular audit should be done to rationalize the C- Section rates.
abstractGer	Introduction: Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed in obstetrics. It has evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mothers and foetus during a difficult delivery. There has been a steady increase in the rate of the caesarean section this study was done to analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of the present study. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted for a period of 1year from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PES institute of medical sciences and research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the study period were recorded and statistical analysis of various parameters such as caesarean section rates, type, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done. Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 3218, out of which C-Sections were 1422. The overall CS rate was 44.18%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (42.61%) followed by CPD (24.82%), NRFS (7.31%), Maternal demand (5.13%), breech presentation (4.43%), oligohydramnios (3.72%) and failed induction of labour (4.21%). 12.26% of patients had various complications mainly infection (5.76%) and haemorrhage (4.31%). There was no mortality during this period. Conclusions: A high priority should be given to a healthy baby and the mother rather than striving to achieve a specific rate. Institutional protocols for conditions like fetal distress, non-progress of labour and failed induction should be doctored. Inductions should be done only when necessary. A regular audit should be done to rationalize the C- Section rates.
abstract_unstemmed	Introduction: Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed in obstetrics. It has evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mothers and foetus during a difficult delivery. There has been a steady increase in the rate of the caesarean section this study was done to analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of the present study. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted for a period of 1year from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PES institute of medical sciences and research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the study period were recorded and statistical analysis of various parameters such as caesarean section rates, type, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done. Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 3218, out of which C-Sections were 1422. The overall CS rate was 44.18%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (42.61%) followed by CPD (24.82%), NRFS (7.31%), Maternal demand (5.13%), breech presentation (4.43%), oligohydramnios (3.72%) and failed induction of labour (4.21%). 12.26% of patients had various complications mainly infection (5.76%) and haemorrhage (4.31%). There was no mortality during this period. Conclusions: A high priority should be given to a healthy baby and the mother rather than striving to achieve a specific rate. Institutional protocols for conditions like fetal distress, non-progress of labour and failed induction should be doctored. Inductions should be done only when necessary. A regular audit should be done to rationalize the C- Section rates.
collection_details	GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ SSG-OLC-PHA GBV_ILN_20 GBV_ILN_22 GBV_ILN_23 GBV_ILN_24 GBV_ILN_39 GBV_ILN_40 GBV_ILN_60 GBV_ILN_62 GBV_ILN_63 GBV_ILN_65 GBV_ILN_69 GBV_ILN_73 GBV_ILN_74 GBV_ILN_95 GBV_ILN_105 GBV_ILN_110 GBV_ILN_151 GBV_ILN_161 GBV_ILN_170 GBV_ILN_206 GBV_ILN_213 GBV_ILN_230 GBV_ILN_285 GBV_ILN_293 GBV_ILN_602 GBV_ILN_2014 GBV_ILN_4012 GBV_ILN_4037 GBV_ILN_4112 GBV_ILN_4125 GBV_ILN_4126 GBV_ILN_4249 GBV_ILN_4305 GBV_ILN_4306 GBV_ILN_4307 GBV_ILN_4313 GBV_ILN_4322 GBV_ILN_4323 GBV_ILN_4324 GBV_ILN_4325 GBV_ILN_4338 GBV_ILN_4367 GBV_ILN_4700
container_issue	4
title_short	Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital
url	http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijsm.CAESAREAN-SECTION-INDICATION https://doaj.org/article/05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471 http://www.ejos.org/index.php?fulltxt=63115&fulltxtj=136&fulltxtp=136-1615466972.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/2367-7414 https://doaj.org/toc/2367-699X
remote_bool	true
author2	Venkata Sushma B Pradeep S.
author2Str	Venkata Sushma B Pradeep S.
ppnlink	828163707
mediatype_str_mv	c
isOA_txt	true
hochschulschrift_bool	false
up_date	2024-07-03T16:38:35.067Z
_version_	1803576635628191744
fullrecord_marcxml	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ075753391</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230503055437.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2021 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ075753391</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Geethashree H C</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction: Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed in obstetrics. It has evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mothers and foetus during a difficult delivery. There has been a steady increase in the rate of the caesarean section this study was done to analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of the present study. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted for a period of 1year from 1st Jan 2019 to 31st Dec 2019 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PES institute of medical sciences and research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the study period were recorded and statistical analysis of various parameters such as caesarean section rates, type, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done. Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 3218, out of which C-Sections were 1422. The overall CS rate was 44.18%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (42.61%) followed by CPD (24.82%), NRFS (7.31%), Maternal demand (5.13%), breech presentation (4.43%), oligohydramnios (3.72%) and failed induction of labour (4.21%). 12.26% of patients had various complications mainly infection (5.76%) and haemorrhage (4.31%). There was no mortality during this period. Conclusions: A high priority should be given to a healthy baby and the mother rather than striving to achieve a specific rate. Institutional protocols for conditions like fetal distress, non-progress of labour and failed induction should be doctored. Inductions should be done only when necessary. A regular audit should be done to rationalize the C- Section rates.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">cesarean section</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">indications</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">elective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">emergency</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Medicine</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">R</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Venkata Sushma B</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pradeep S.</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">International Journal of Surgery and Medicine</subfield><subfield code="d">Bulgarian Association of Young Surgeons, 2015</subfield><subfield code="g">7(2021), 4, Seite 19-24</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)828163707</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-600)2825196-9</subfield><subfield code="x">2367699X</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:7</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield><subfield code="g">number:4</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:19-24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ijsm.CAESAREAN-SECTION-INDICATION</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/05f315adec174dd1a62bb2adfdf96471</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://www.ejos.org/index.php?fulltxt=63115&fulltxtj=136&fulltxtp=136-1615466972.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2367-7414</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/2367-699X</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SSG-OLC-PHA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_24</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_39</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_40</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_60</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_62</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_63</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_65</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_69</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_74</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_95</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_110</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_151</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_170</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_206</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_213</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_285</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_293</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4112</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4125</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4126</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4249</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4307</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4313</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4322</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4323</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4324</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4325</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4367</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_ILN_4700</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">7</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield><subfield code="e">4</subfield><subfield code="h">19-24</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
score	7.4011593

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Schreiben Sie uns!

Indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care rural hospital

Nicht das Richtige dabei?

Zugang & Verfügbarkeit

Vorhandene Bände

Nicht das Richtige dabei?