Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an
This research examines statements made by Ibn-Abbass regarding the writing of the Quranic script; the statements may be misunderstood as doubting the script writing process. It attempts to survey Ibn-Abbaass's statements in question, to establish how sound or weak they are, to investigate the...
Ausführliche Beschreibung
Gespeichert in:
| Autor*in: |
Mansour Hamad Eidi [verfasserIn] |
|---|
| Format: |
E-Artikel |
|---|---|
| Sprache: |
Arabisch ; Englisch |
| Erschienen: |
2017 |
|---|
| Schlagwörter: |
|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
In: Journal of Islamic Studies - King Saud University, 2018, 29(2017), 1, Seite 151-184 |
|---|---|
| Übergeordnetes Werk: |
volume:29 ; year:2017 ; number:1 ; pages:151-184 |
| Links: |
|---|
| Katalog-ID: |
DOAJ076221709 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ076221709 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230309142203.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230228s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||ara c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ076221709 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a ara |a eng | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Mansour Hamad Eidi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This research examines statements made by Ibn-Abbass regarding the writing of the Quranic script; the statements may be misunderstood as doubting the script writing process. It attempts to survey Ibn-Abbaass's statements in question, to establish how sound or weak they are, to investigate the problematic statements, to affirm the credibility of the Qur'anic script with respect to the soundness of the Islamic faith, and to identify and discuss the ulama's related views, highlighting the most potential view. Methodologically, the research follows an inductive analytical approach. This surveys, documents and validates Ibn-Abbaass's statements in terms of text and chain of narrators. It also surveys ulama's varied views in that respect. The research has reached the following conclusions: 1- Ibn-Abbaass's explicit statements questioning the writing the Qur'anic script are limited in number, only four; 2- only two statements are nearer to the truth; Ibn-Abbaass is not reported to have mentioned "Zaid Ibn-Thaabit" by name, but "the script writer", and hence the possibility of varied meanings; even if Ibn-Abbaass's query is acceptable, the Qur'anic script remains unaffected; and Ibn-Abbaass has been influenced by the Qur'anic reading style of his teacher Ubayy Ibn-Ka'b, as obvious in a number of strange recitations. The research makes the following recommendations: further studies should be conducted on related statements made by other sahaabah (Prophet's companions) and the taabi'een (sahaabah's successors); there should be a revision of all comments made on such problematic statements; related research should not aim at defending the Qur'anic script against doubters; and research should concentrate on the validity and significance of statements. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers. | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Philosophy. Psychology. Religion | |
| 653 | 0 | |a B | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Islamic Studies |d King Saud University, 2018 |g 29(2017), 1, Seite 151-184 |w (DE-627)176063204X |x 16586301 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:151-184 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://jis.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jis.ksu.edu.sa/files/029-01-05_0.pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a SYSFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 29 |j 2017 |e 1 |h 151-184 | ||
| author_variant |
m h e mhe |
|---|---|
| matchkey_str |
article:16586301:2017----::babassaeetmsnepeeariigob |
| hierarchy_sort_str |
2017 |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| allfields |
(DE-627)DOAJ076221709 (DE-599)DOAJ6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng Mansour Hamad Eidi verfasserin aut Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This research examines statements made by Ibn-Abbass regarding the writing of the Quranic script; the statements may be misunderstood as doubting the script writing process. It attempts to survey Ibn-Abbaass's statements in question, to establish how sound or weak they are, to investigate the problematic statements, to affirm the credibility of the Qur'anic script with respect to the soundness of the Islamic faith, and to identify and discuss the ulama's related views, highlighting the most potential view. Methodologically, the research follows an inductive analytical approach. This surveys, documents and validates Ibn-Abbaass's statements in terms of text and chain of narrators. It also surveys ulama's varied views in that respect. The research has reached the following conclusions: 1- Ibn-Abbaass's explicit statements questioning the writing the Qur'anic script are limited in number, only four; 2- only two statements are nearer to the truth; Ibn-Abbaass is not reported to have mentioned "Zaid Ibn-Thaabit" by name, but "the script writer", and hence the possibility of varied meanings; even if Ibn-Abbaass's query is acceptable, the Qur'anic script remains unaffected; and Ibn-Abbaass has been influenced by the Qur'anic reading style of his teacher Ubayy Ibn-Ka'b, as obvious in a number of strange recitations. The research makes the following recommendations: further studies should be conducted on related statements made by other sahaabah (Prophet's companions) and the taabi'een (sahaabah's successors); there should be a revision of all comments made on such problematic statements; related research should not aim at defending the Qur'anic script against doubters; and research should concentrate on the validity and significance of statements. Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers. Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Journal of Islamic Studies King Saud University, 2018 29(2017), 1, Seite 151-184 (DE-627)176063204X 16586301 nnns volume:29 year:2017 number:1 pages:151-184 https://doaj.org/article/6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 kostenfrei https://jis.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jis.ksu.edu.sa/files/029-01-05_0.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 29 2017 1 151-184 |
| spelling |
(DE-627)DOAJ076221709 (DE-599)DOAJ6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng Mansour Hamad Eidi verfasserin aut Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This research examines statements made by Ibn-Abbass regarding the writing of the Quranic script; the statements may be misunderstood as doubting the script writing process. It attempts to survey Ibn-Abbaass's statements in question, to establish how sound or weak they are, to investigate the problematic statements, to affirm the credibility of the Qur'anic script with respect to the soundness of the Islamic faith, and to identify and discuss the ulama's related views, highlighting the most potential view. Methodologically, the research follows an inductive analytical approach. This surveys, documents and validates Ibn-Abbaass's statements in terms of text and chain of narrators. It also surveys ulama's varied views in that respect. The research has reached the following conclusions: 1- Ibn-Abbaass's explicit statements questioning the writing the Qur'anic script are limited in number, only four; 2- only two statements are nearer to the truth; Ibn-Abbaass is not reported to have mentioned "Zaid Ibn-Thaabit" by name, but "the script writer", and hence the possibility of varied meanings; even if Ibn-Abbaass's query is acceptable, the Qur'anic script remains unaffected; and Ibn-Abbaass has been influenced by the Qur'anic reading style of his teacher Ubayy Ibn-Ka'b, as obvious in a number of strange recitations. The research makes the following recommendations: further studies should be conducted on related statements made by other sahaabah (Prophet's companions) and the taabi'een (sahaabah's successors); there should be a revision of all comments made on such problematic statements; related research should not aim at defending the Qur'anic script against doubters; and research should concentrate on the validity and significance of statements. Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers. Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Journal of Islamic Studies King Saud University, 2018 29(2017), 1, Seite 151-184 (DE-627)176063204X 16586301 nnns volume:29 year:2017 number:1 pages:151-184 https://doaj.org/article/6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 kostenfrei https://jis.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jis.ksu.edu.sa/files/029-01-05_0.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 29 2017 1 151-184 |
| allfields_unstemmed |
(DE-627)DOAJ076221709 (DE-599)DOAJ6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng Mansour Hamad Eidi verfasserin aut Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This research examines statements made by Ibn-Abbass regarding the writing of the Quranic script; the statements may be misunderstood as doubting the script writing process. It attempts to survey Ibn-Abbaass's statements in question, to establish how sound or weak they are, to investigate the problematic statements, to affirm the credibility of the Qur'anic script with respect to the soundness of the Islamic faith, and to identify and discuss the ulama's related views, highlighting the most potential view. Methodologically, the research follows an inductive analytical approach. This surveys, documents and validates Ibn-Abbaass's statements in terms of text and chain of narrators. It also surveys ulama's varied views in that respect. The research has reached the following conclusions: 1- Ibn-Abbaass's explicit statements questioning the writing the Qur'anic script are limited in number, only four; 2- only two statements are nearer to the truth; Ibn-Abbaass is not reported to have mentioned "Zaid Ibn-Thaabit" by name, but "the script writer", and hence the possibility of varied meanings; even if Ibn-Abbaass's query is acceptable, the Qur'anic script remains unaffected; and Ibn-Abbaass has been influenced by the Qur'anic reading style of his teacher Ubayy Ibn-Ka'b, as obvious in a number of strange recitations. The research makes the following recommendations: further studies should be conducted on related statements made by other sahaabah (Prophet's companions) and the taabi'een (sahaabah's successors); there should be a revision of all comments made on such problematic statements; related research should not aim at defending the Qur'anic script against doubters; and research should concentrate on the validity and significance of statements. Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers. Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Journal of Islamic Studies King Saud University, 2018 29(2017), 1, Seite 151-184 (DE-627)176063204X 16586301 nnns volume:29 year:2017 number:1 pages:151-184 https://doaj.org/article/6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 kostenfrei https://jis.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jis.ksu.edu.sa/files/029-01-05_0.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 29 2017 1 151-184 |
| allfieldsGer |
(DE-627)DOAJ076221709 (DE-599)DOAJ6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng Mansour Hamad Eidi verfasserin aut Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This research examines statements made by Ibn-Abbass regarding the writing of the Quranic script; the statements may be misunderstood as doubting the script writing process. It attempts to survey Ibn-Abbaass's statements in question, to establish how sound or weak they are, to investigate the problematic statements, to affirm the credibility of the Qur'anic script with respect to the soundness of the Islamic faith, and to identify and discuss the ulama's related views, highlighting the most potential view. Methodologically, the research follows an inductive analytical approach. This surveys, documents and validates Ibn-Abbaass's statements in terms of text and chain of narrators. It also surveys ulama's varied views in that respect. The research has reached the following conclusions: 1- Ibn-Abbaass's explicit statements questioning the writing the Qur'anic script are limited in number, only four; 2- only two statements are nearer to the truth; Ibn-Abbaass is not reported to have mentioned "Zaid Ibn-Thaabit" by name, but "the script writer", and hence the possibility of varied meanings; even if Ibn-Abbaass's query is acceptable, the Qur'anic script remains unaffected; and Ibn-Abbaass has been influenced by the Qur'anic reading style of his teacher Ubayy Ibn-Ka'b, as obvious in a number of strange recitations. The research makes the following recommendations: further studies should be conducted on related statements made by other sahaabah (Prophet's companions) and the taabi'een (sahaabah's successors); there should be a revision of all comments made on such problematic statements; related research should not aim at defending the Qur'anic script against doubters; and research should concentrate on the validity and significance of statements. Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers. Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Journal of Islamic Studies King Saud University, 2018 29(2017), 1, Seite 151-184 (DE-627)176063204X 16586301 nnns volume:29 year:2017 number:1 pages:151-184 https://doaj.org/article/6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 kostenfrei https://jis.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jis.ksu.edu.sa/files/029-01-05_0.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 29 2017 1 151-184 |
| allfieldsSound |
(DE-627)DOAJ076221709 (DE-599)DOAJ6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 DE-627 ger DE-627 rakwb ara eng Mansour Hamad Eidi verfasserin aut Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an 2017 Text txt rdacontent Computermedien c rdamedia Online-Ressource cr rdacarrier This research examines statements made by Ibn-Abbass regarding the writing of the Quranic script; the statements may be misunderstood as doubting the script writing process. It attempts to survey Ibn-Abbaass's statements in question, to establish how sound or weak they are, to investigate the problematic statements, to affirm the credibility of the Qur'anic script with respect to the soundness of the Islamic faith, and to identify and discuss the ulama's related views, highlighting the most potential view. Methodologically, the research follows an inductive analytical approach. This surveys, documents and validates Ibn-Abbaass's statements in terms of text and chain of narrators. It also surveys ulama's varied views in that respect. The research has reached the following conclusions: 1- Ibn-Abbaass's explicit statements questioning the writing the Qur'anic script are limited in number, only four; 2- only two statements are nearer to the truth; Ibn-Abbaass is not reported to have mentioned "Zaid Ibn-Thaabit" by name, but "the script writer", and hence the possibility of varied meanings; even if Ibn-Abbaass's query is acceptable, the Qur'anic script remains unaffected; and Ibn-Abbaass has been influenced by the Qur'anic reading style of his teacher Ubayy Ibn-Ka'b, as obvious in a number of strange recitations. The research makes the following recommendations: further studies should be conducted on related statements made by other sahaabah (Prophet's companions) and the taabi'een (sahaabah's successors); there should be a revision of all comments made on such problematic statements; related research should not aim at defending the Qur'anic script against doubters; and research should concentrate on the validity and significance of statements. Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers. Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B In Journal of Islamic Studies King Saud University, 2018 29(2017), 1, Seite 151-184 (DE-627)176063204X 16586301 nnns volume:29 year:2017 number:1 pages:151-184 https://doaj.org/article/6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 kostenfrei https://jis.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jis.ksu.edu.sa/files/029-01-05_0.pdf kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 Journal toc kostenfrei https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 Journal toc kostenfrei GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ AR 29 2017 1 151-184 |
| language |
Arabic English |
| source |
In Journal of Islamic Studies 29(2017), 1, Seite 151-184 volume:29 year:2017 number:1 pages:151-184 |
| sourceStr |
In Journal of Islamic Studies 29(2017), 1, Seite 151-184 volume:29 year:2017 number:1 pages:151-184 |
| format_phy_str_mv |
Article |
| institution |
findex.gbv.de |
| topic_facet |
Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers. Philosophy. Psychology. Religion B |
| isfreeaccess_bool |
true |
| container_title |
Journal of Islamic Studies |
| authorswithroles_txt_mv |
Mansour Hamad Eidi @@aut@@ |
| publishDateDaySort_date |
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z |
| hierarchy_top_id |
176063204X |
| id |
DOAJ076221709 |
| language_de |
arabisch englisch |
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ076221709</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309142203.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||ara c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ076221709</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ara</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mansour Hamad Eidi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This research examines statements made by Ibn-Abbass regarding the writing of the Quranic script; the statements may be misunderstood as doubting the script writing process. It attempts to survey Ibn-Abbaass's statements in question, to establish how sound or weak they are, to investigate the problematic statements, to affirm the credibility of the Qur'anic script with respect to the soundness of the Islamic faith, and to identify and discuss the ulama's related views, highlighting the most potential view. Methodologically, the research follows an inductive analytical approach. This surveys, documents and validates Ibn-Abbaass's statements in terms of text and chain of narrators. It also surveys ulama's varied views in that respect. The research has reached the following conclusions: 1- Ibn-Abbaass's explicit statements questioning the writing the Qur'anic script are limited in number, only four; 2- only two statements are nearer to the truth; Ibn-Abbaass is not reported to have mentioned "Zaid Ibn-Thaabit" by name, but "the script writer", and hence the possibility of varied meanings; even if Ibn-Abbaass's query is acceptable, the Qur'anic script remains unaffected; and Ibn-Abbaass has been influenced by the Qur'anic reading style of his teacher Ubayy Ibn-Ka'b, as obvious in a number of strange recitations. The research makes the following recommendations: further studies should be conducted on related statements made by other sahaabah (Prophet's companions) and the taabi'een (sahaabah's successors); there should be a revision of all comments made on such problematic statements; related research should not aim at defending the Qur'anic script against doubters; and research should concentrate on the validity and significance of statements.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy. Psychology. Religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Islamic Studies</subfield><subfield code="d">King Saud University, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2017), 1, Seite 151-184</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176063204X</subfield><subfield code="x">16586301</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:151-184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://jis.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jis.ksu.edu.sa/files/029-01-05_0.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">151-184</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| author |
Mansour Hamad Eidi |
| spellingShingle |
Mansour Hamad Eidi misc Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers. misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an |
| authorStr |
Mansour Hamad Eidi |
| ppnlink_with_tag_str_mv |
@@773@@(DE-627)176063204X |
| format |
electronic Article |
| delete_txt_mv |
keep |
| author_role |
aut |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| remote_str |
true |
| illustrated |
Not Illustrated |
| issn |
16586301 |
| topic_title |
Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers |
| topic |
misc Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers. misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B |
| topic_unstemmed |
misc Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers. misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B |
| topic_browse |
misc Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers. misc Philosophy. Psychology. Religion misc B |
| format_facet |
Elektronische Aufsätze Aufsätze Elektronische Ressource |
| format_main_str_mv |
Text Zeitschrift/Artikel |
| carriertype_str_mv |
cr |
| hierarchy_parent_title |
Journal of Islamic Studies |
| hierarchy_parent_id |
176063204X |
| hierarchy_top_title |
Journal of Islamic Studies |
| isfreeaccess_txt |
true |
| familylinks_str_mv |
(DE-627)176063204X |
| title |
Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an |
| ctrlnum |
(DE-627)DOAJ076221709 (DE-599)DOAJ6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 |
| title_full |
Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an |
| author_sort |
Mansour Hamad Eidi |
| journal |
Journal of Islamic Studies |
| journalStr |
Journal of Islamic Studies |
| lang_code |
ara eng |
| isOA_bool |
true |
| recordtype |
marc |
| publishDateSort |
2017 |
| contenttype_str_mv |
txt |
| container_start_page |
151 |
| author_browse |
Mansour Hamad Eidi |
| container_volume |
29 |
| format_se |
Elektronische Aufsätze |
| author-letter |
Mansour Hamad Eidi |
| title_sort |
ibn-abbaass's statements misinterpreted as raising doubts on writing the qur'an |
| title_auth |
Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an |
| abstract |
This research examines statements made by Ibn-Abbass regarding the writing of the Quranic script; the statements may be misunderstood as doubting the script writing process. It attempts to survey Ibn-Abbaass's statements in question, to establish how sound or weak they are, to investigate the problematic statements, to affirm the credibility of the Qur'anic script with respect to the soundness of the Islamic faith, and to identify and discuss the ulama's related views, highlighting the most potential view. Methodologically, the research follows an inductive analytical approach. This surveys, documents and validates Ibn-Abbaass's statements in terms of text and chain of narrators. It also surveys ulama's varied views in that respect. The research has reached the following conclusions: 1- Ibn-Abbaass's explicit statements questioning the writing the Qur'anic script are limited in number, only four; 2- only two statements are nearer to the truth; Ibn-Abbaass is not reported to have mentioned "Zaid Ibn-Thaabit" by name, but "the script writer", and hence the possibility of varied meanings; even if Ibn-Abbaass's query is acceptable, the Qur'anic script remains unaffected; and Ibn-Abbaass has been influenced by the Qur'anic reading style of his teacher Ubayy Ibn-Ka'b, as obvious in a number of strange recitations. The research makes the following recommendations: further studies should be conducted on related statements made by other sahaabah (Prophet's companions) and the taabi'een (sahaabah's successors); there should be a revision of all comments made on such problematic statements; related research should not aim at defending the Qur'anic script against doubters; and research should concentrate on the validity and significance of statements. |
| abstractGer |
This research examines statements made by Ibn-Abbass regarding the writing of the Quranic script; the statements may be misunderstood as doubting the script writing process. It attempts to survey Ibn-Abbaass's statements in question, to establish how sound or weak they are, to investigate the problematic statements, to affirm the credibility of the Qur'anic script with respect to the soundness of the Islamic faith, and to identify and discuss the ulama's related views, highlighting the most potential view. Methodologically, the research follows an inductive analytical approach. This surveys, documents and validates Ibn-Abbaass's statements in terms of text and chain of narrators. It also surveys ulama's varied views in that respect. The research has reached the following conclusions: 1- Ibn-Abbaass's explicit statements questioning the writing the Qur'anic script are limited in number, only four; 2- only two statements are nearer to the truth; Ibn-Abbaass is not reported to have mentioned "Zaid Ibn-Thaabit" by name, but "the script writer", and hence the possibility of varied meanings; even if Ibn-Abbaass's query is acceptable, the Qur'anic script remains unaffected; and Ibn-Abbaass has been influenced by the Qur'anic reading style of his teacher Ubayy Ibn-Ka'b, as obvious in a number of strange recitations. The research makes the following recommendations: further studies should be conducted on related statements made by other sahaabah (Prophet's companions) and the taabi'een (sahaabah's successors); there should be a revision of all comments made on such problematic statements; related research should not aim at defending the Qur'anic script against doubters; and research should concentrate on the validity and significance of statements. |
| abstract_unstemmed |
This research examines statements made by Ibn-Abbass regarding the writing of the Quranic script; the statements may be misunderstood as doubting the script writing process. It attempts to survey Ibn-Abbaass's statements in question, to establish how sound or weak they are, to investigate the problematic statements, to affirm the credibility of the Qur'anic script with respect to the soundness of the Islamic faith, and to identify and discuss the ulama's related views, highlighting the most potential view. Methodologically, the research follows an inductive analytical approach. This surveys, documents and validates Ibn-Abbaass's statements in terms of text and chain of narrators. It also surveys ulama's varied views in that respect. The research has reached the following conclusions: 1- Ibn-Abbaass's explicit statements questioning the writing the Qur'anic script are limited in number, only four; 2- only two statements are nearer to the truth; Ibn-Abbaass is not reported to have mentioned "Zaid Ibn-Thaabit" by name, but "the script writer", and hence the possibility of varied meanings; even if Ibn-Abbaass's query is acceptable, the Qur'anic script remains unaffected; and Ibn-Abbaass has been influenced by the Qur'anic reading style of his teacher Ubayy Ibn-Ka'b, as obvious in a number of strange recitations. The research makes the following recommendations: further studies should be conducted on related statements made by other sahaabah (Prophet's companions) and the taabi'een (sahaabah's successors); there should be a revision of all comments made on such problematic statements; related research should not aim at defending the Qur'anic script against doubters; and research should concentrate on the validity and significance of statements. |
| collection_details |
GBV_USEFLAG_A SYSFLAG_A GBV_DOAJ |
| container_issue |
1 |
| title_short |
Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9 https://jis.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jis.ksu.edu.sa/files/029-01-05_0.pdf https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301 |
| remote_bool |
true |
| ppnlink |
176063204X |
| mediatype_str_mv |
c |
| isOA_txt |
true |
| hochschulschrift_bool |
false |
| up_date |
2024-07-03T19:16:23.575Z |
| _version_ |
1803586564078436352 |
| fullrecord_marcxml |
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01000caa a22002652 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">DOAJ076221709</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-627</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230309142203.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">230228s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||ara c</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-627)DOAJ076221709</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)DOAJ6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="c">DE-627</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ara</subfield><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mansour Hamad Eidi</subfield><subfield code="e">verfasserin</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ibn-Abbaass's Statements Misinterpreted as Raising Doubts on Writing the Qur'an</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Text</subfield><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Computermedien</subfield><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This research examines statements made by Ibn-Abbass regarding the writing of the Quranic script; the statements may be misunderstood as doubting the script writing process. It attempts to survey Ibn-Abbaass's statements in question, to establish how sound or weak they are, to investigate the problematic statements, to affirm the credibility of the Qur'anic script with respect to the soundness of the Islamic faith, and to identify and discuss the ulama's related views, highlighting the most potential view. Methodologically, the research follows an inductive analytical approach. This surveys, documents and validates Ibn-Abbaass's statements in terms of text and chain of narrators. It also surveys ulama's varied views in that respect. The research has reached the following conclusions: 1- Ibn-Abbaass's explicit statements questioning the writing the Qur'anic script are limited in number, only four; 2- only two statements are nearer to the truth; Ibn-Abbaass is not reported to have mentioned "Zaid Ibn-Thaabit" by name, but "the script writer", and hence the possibility of varied meanings; even if Ibn-Abbaass's query is acceptable, the Qur'anic script remains unaffected; and Ibn-Abbaass has been influenced by the Qur'anic reading style of his teacher Ubayy Ibn-Ka'b, as obvious in a number of strange recitations. The research makes the following recommendations: further studies should be conducted on related statements made by other sahaabah (Prophet's companions) and the taabi'een (sahaabah's successors); there should be a revision of all comments made on such problematic statements; related research should not aim at defending the Qur'anic script against doubters; and research should concentrate on the validity and significance of statements.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Qur'an script – writing the Qur'an – Ibn-Abbaass – documenting the Qur'an - script validity – early Qur'an script writers.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Philosophy. Psychology. Religion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">In</subfield><subfield code="t">Journal of Islamic Studies</subfield><subfield code="d">King Saud University, 2018</subfield><subfield code="g">29(2017), 1, Seite 151-184</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-627)176063204X</subfield><subfield code="x">16586301</subfield><subfield code="7">nnns</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:29</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2017</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">pages:151-184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/article/6bacc80ba6df4ca3bbf389e5eecfd1e9</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://jis.ksu.edu.sa/sites/jis.ksu.edu.sa/files/029-01-05_0.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="u">https://doaj.org/toc/1658-6301</subfield><subfield code="y">Journal toc</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_USEFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">SYSFLAG_A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">GBV_DOAJ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="951" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">AR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="d">29</subfield><subfield code="j">2017</subfield><subfield code="e">1</subfield><subfield code="h">151-184</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
|
| score |
7.4011087 |